Abstract
Small-molecule fluorescent probes play a myriad of important roles in chemical sensing. Many such systems incorporating a receptor component designed to recognise and bind a specific analyte, and a reporter or transducer component which signals the binding event with a change in fluorescence output have been developed. Fluorescent probes use a variety of mechanisms to transmit the binding event to the reporter unit, including photoinduced electron transfer (PET), charge transfer (CT), Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), excimer formation, and aggregation induced emission (AIE) or aggregation caused quenching (ACQ). These systems respond to a wide array of potential analytes including protons, metal cations, anions, carbohydrates, and other biomolecules. This review surveys important new fluorescence-based probes for these and other analytes that have been reported over the past five years, focusing on the most widely exploited macrocyclic recognition components, those based on cyclam, calixarenes, cyclodextrins and crown ethers; other macrocyclic and non-macrocyclic receptors are also discussed.
Keywords: chemosensor, fluorescence sensing, fluoroionophore, spectroscopy, molecular probes
1. Introduction
A chemical sensor provides analytical data about species present in a chemical system and consists of two essential components—a receptor, which binds the substrate/analyte, and a transducer, which reports this binding event [1]. For a chemosensor, defined as a molecule of abiotic origin that signals the presence of matter or energy [2], the receptor interacts with the species of interest to trigger a detectable signal from the transducer, which reports useful information (Figure 1, central panel) [3,4]. Molecular chemosensors offer the key advantage that they may be constructed using the tools of synthetic chemistry, and thus readily modified to alter either the selectivity of the receptor or the sensitivity and output of the transducer. A diverse range of chemosensor probes has been developed based on a variety of structures ranging from small molecules, metal complexes and macrocycles through to polymers, carbon nanotubes, quantum dots and nanoparticles. These systems have been developed for the sensing and detection of substrates of varying size and charge, ranging from cations and anions, to small molecules such as explosives, and biologically important motifs [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
Upon substrate-receptor binding, the interaction is most commonly transduced as an optical or electrochemical signal [7,8,15,16]. An optical change may manifest as either a change to the absorbance profile of the probe, allowing colorimetric determination using UV/Vis spectroscopy, or an enhancement or quenching of the probe’s emission profile, enabling measurement of emission wavelength and intensity by fluorescence spectroscopy. An electrochemical change resulting from a change in current or redox potential may be measured by voltammetry.
The detection of chemical species has great importance in a variety of fields including environmental, medicinal and biological contexts, and security. For example, it is well established that mercury is a highly toxic heavy metal to humans and other organisms, and thus to ensure drinking water does not exceed the World Health Organization’s guideline value of 6 µg/L of inorganic mercury, continuous monitoring of water quality is required to maintain public health and safety [17,18]. Copper species have been implicated in a variety of neurodegenerative diseases including Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases via the generation of hydrogen peroxide and other reactive oxygen species, and thus sensors that allow biological imaging of copper in specific intracellular components or processes allow further insight to be gained for medical research into related diseases and disorders [19,20,21,22]. Conversely, as an essential trace element, the monitoring of copper in biological systems is important as copper deficiency leads to a variety of diseases in humans including anaemia and leukopenia [23]. From a security standpoint, the proliferation of explosive devices and the risk of terrorist organisations or rogue states obtaining chemical warfare agents mean that probes which can detect such residues quickly, accurately and safely are of greatly increased value [24,25,26,27].
Numerous classes of fluorescent probes have been developed for the detection of a wide variety of analytes via a variety of emission mechanisms. Many excellent reviews have been published in the area, focusing on particular classes of analyte [28,29,30,31,32,33], receptor or transducer architecture [12,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41], and other aspects of fluorescence sensing [5,42,43,44,45]. This review will focus on selected interesting structural classes of fluorescence-based chemosensors for a variety of analytes reported over the past five years.
2. Fluorescence Sensing Mechanisms
Fluorescence spectroscopy may be used for sensing if a fluorophore is employed as the transducer (reporter) component of a chemosensor. Fluorescence methods offer high sensitivity and fast response times and are relatively inexpensive compared to other analytical techniques such as inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) or ICP atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). A variety of photophysical mechanisms for fluorescence sensing of analytes are known (Figure 1) [44,46], including photoinduced electron transfer (PET), charge transfer (CT), Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), excimer formation, and the more recently developed aggregation induced emission (AIE) or aggregation caused quenching (ACQ).
PET-based chemosensors consist of a receptor-linker-fluorophore system and operate as ‘off-on’ or intensity-based probes [44,47,48,49]. Upon excitation of the fluorophore, PET occurs from the receptor HOMO to the HOMO of the excited fluorophore (vacated by the irradiation). The previously excited electron is then unable to return to its original ground state; it is instead back-donated to the receptor and fluorescence is quenched (the ‘off’ state) (Figure 1a). When a cation binds, the redox potential of the receptor is raised as electrons are donated from the receptor to the cation. This lowers the energy of the receptor HOMO to below that of the fluorophore HOMO. As a result the PET process is no longer active and the excited electron in the LUMO of the fluorophore can return to its original ground state with fluorescence emission (the ‘on’ state).
Many chemosensors exploit internal (or intramolecular) charge transfer (ICT) pathways [44,48,49], for which fluorescence effects hinge on the combination of electron donating and electron accepting groups within a conjugated π system that incorporates both the fluorophore (transducer) and receptor. Upon excitation, redistribution of electron density (i.e., CT) from the electron donating moiety to the electron acceptor creates a dipole moment within the molecule. When an analyte binds, this dipole may be enhanced or reduced, depending on the nature of the analyte and the electronic relationship between the receptor and the fluorophore. A reduced dipole moment will result in decreased molar absorptivity and blue-shifted absorbance and fluorescence emission (reflecting reduced conjugation of the ICT system which leads to greater destabilisation of the excited state relative to the ground state upon analyte binding). Conversely, an enhanced dipole will result in an increase in molar absorptivity and red-shifted absorbance and fluorescence (on account of enhanced conjugation that stabilises the excited state more than the ground state when the analyte is bound) (Figure 1b). Other charge transfer processes include twisted internal charge transfer (TICT) [50,51] and metal-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) [46,52]. CT pathways are highly dependent on solvent polarity as the arrangement of solvent molecules around the dipole can provide added stabilisation. As changes are commonly observed to the intensity of more than one emission band, CT sensors enable ratiometric detection of analytes (whereby changes in the ratio of fluorescence emission at different wavelengths—i.e., changes in emission colour—are monitored, meaning the response is independent of probe concentration) [31,49].
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a non-radiative transfer of energy from an excited energy donor fluorophore to an energy acceptor via long range dipole-dipole interactions [44,46,53,54]. When FRET operates, fluorescence emission from the original excited fluorophore is not observed; instead the acceptor is excited. If a suitable fluorophore is chosen, the wavelength of the emitted light is far red-shifted from the original excitation wavelength of the donor (Figure 1c). The effectiveness of a FRET process is determined by the spectral overlap between the emission profile of the donor and the absorption profile of the acceptor, the distance between the donor and acceptor units (which is ideally in the range 10–100 Å), and the orientation of the dipole moments of donor and acceptor. Thus ratiometric probes can be obtained by using analyte binding to disrupt a FRET process, while using FRET to a non-emissive energy acceptor results in probes with an effective ‘on-off’ response to analyte binding.
Excimers (‘excited state dimers’) are dimers of fluorophores and are formed upon excitation with light, when half-filled orbitals of the excited fluorophore interact with another fluorophore in its ground state via π–π stacking [42,44,48]. Exciplexes (‘excited state complexes’) operate on a similar principle, but are heterodimeric or involve more than two species [55,56]. The emission profiles of excimer-forming systems consist of bands corresponding to the fluorophore monomer and a broad excimer emission band which is red-shifted relative to the original fluorophore emission. Either stacking or dissociation of fluorophore excimers may be perturbed by analyte binding, enabling the use of such systems as ratiometric probes.
Fluorophore aggregation commonly leads to a decrease in fluorescence intensity (i.e., ACQ), due to the formation of species with poorer fluorescence properties [57]. The contrasting phenomenon AIE was first reported by Tang et al. in 2001 [58], working with molecules that incorporate ‘rotors’ such as phenyl groups. These groups undergo movement or rotation in dilute solutions or in the non-aggregated form, enabling non-radiative decay pathways for excited electrons of AIE fluorophores [46,57,59,60,61]. When such molecules aggregate, fluorescence enhancement is observed, triggered by the restriction of motion (RIM) or rotation (RIR) which inhibit non-radiative pathways due to steric interactions, enable radiative decay, and turn on fluorescence (Figure 1d).
3. Cyclam-Based Sensors
The azamacrocyclic tetramine cyclam is a versatile ligand that can be easily functionalised and exhibits strong binding to a variety of cations as a result of the macrocyclic effect, which arises from combination of enthalpic and entropic factors [62]. A variety of cyclam-based compounds have found uses and applications in sensing and other fields [63,64,65,66,67].
The anthracene-substituted Cu2+-cyclam complex 1 has been reported as an ‘off-on’ sensor for HS− (Figure 2) [68]. Screening the fluorescence response upon the addition of a variety of different anions, biothiols and oxidants to the weakly fluorescent 1 revealed that the complex is sensitive to HS− in aqueous media with an observed 5.5-fold fluorescence increase upon the addition of up to 100 equivalents of HS−. The resulting emission spectrum after the addition of HS− was nearly identical to that of the parent cyclam ligand, suggesting the fluorescence increase is due to the demetallation of 1 by HS−. Fluorescence imaging of HS−-spiked HeLa cells pre-incubated with 1 also demonstrated a significant response to increasing HS− concentration.
The detection of the similar anion S2− through the use of another Cu2+-cyclam complex has been developed based on a surface-functionalised carbon dot system 2 [69]. The metal-free sensor 2 displayed good selectivity and sensitivity to the coordination of Cu2+ in water with effective fluorescence quenching observed over a variety of competing cations tested, with the exception of Fe3+. A screen of the resulting 2·Cu2+ complex with a range of anions revealed that S2− alone led to a fluorescence increase and restoration of the original emission profile of the sensor 2, thought to occur via demetallation and formation of CuS. This ‘on-off-on’ fluorescence change in response to Cu2+ and S2− is attributed to a FRET process which takes place from the carbon dot to the Cu2+-cyclam complex. As the Cu2+-cyclam complex is non-emissive, the original fluorescence from the carbon dot would be supressed by FRET and consequently regeneration of the free cyclam ligand upon S2− binding revives the carbon dot fluorescence. The utility of this system was demonstrated in the detection of Cu2+ in blood serum and tap water, while its low cytotoxicity has been exploited for the successful fluorescence confocal imaging of Cu2+ and S2− in spiked HeLa cells.
The Cu2+-cyclam complex 3 which bears a near-infrared fluorophore dihydroxanthene (Figure 2) has been reported as a selective sensor for nitroxyl (HNO), the one-electron reduced form of nitric oxide (NO), for applications in near-infrared fluorescence biological sensing [70]. The sensor 3 was shown to be selective for Angeli’s salt, an HNO donor, over a variety of analytes including NO and thiols with a 5-fold fluorescence enhancement of the emission at 715 nm after addition of excess (100 equivalents) Angeli’s salt. Mechanistic studies by cyclic voltammetry, EPR and MS suggested that when 3 binds HNO, the Cu2+ is reduced to Cu+ leading to demetallation and a consequent increase in fluorescence emission. The near-infrared emission profile of the sensor 3 allowed it to be used in multicolour live cell imaging in conjunction with the green fluorescent sensor ZP1 for the simultaneous sensing of HNO and downstream increases in Zn2+ concentration in response to the presence of HNO. The Cu2+-cyclam complex 4 has also been used for the sensing of HNO, and reported by the same group [71]. The lysine backbone was assembled on a solid phase resin, coupled with rhodamine and cyclam, cleaved from the resin using TFA and finally complexed with Cu2+ to afford 4. The sensor was selective for HNO and demonstrated a 4-fold fluorescence enhancement of the tetramethylrhodamine emission at 580 nm after the addition of an excess (200 equiv.) of Angeli’s salt. However, in contrast to 3, mechanistic studies revealed that upon binding and reduction of Cu2+ to Cu+ by HNO, a fast re-oxidation process occurred with retention of Cu2+ in the cyclam. Sensor 4 was also shown to be non-cytotoxic and has been applied to the intracellular sensing of HNO levels in HeLa cells.
The cation binding affinity of cyclam has been exploited in a polymeric nanoparticle for Cu2+ sensing [72]. Sensor 5 was synthesised by a one-pot mini-emulsion polymerisation to include the naphthalimide fluorophore covalently bound inside the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) nanoparticle, with vinylbenzylcyclam attached to the PMMA surface as the receptor for Cu2+ (Figure 3). Sensor 5 was shown to tolerate a reasonably wide pH range (4 to 7) with good photostability after storage for >45 days. It is selective for Cu2+ in competition experiments with other cations which are known to form complexes with cyclam in aqueous solution (Zn2+, Ni2+, Co2+, Hg2+, Mn2+) and produced a decrease in fluorescence output at 505 nm with a 500 nM detection limit. The fluorescence quenching response is due to the establishment of FRET between the donor PMMA and the acceptor Cu2+-cyclam which is not emissive.
A number of cyclam-based chemosensors have been developed for metal ions using the copper-catalysed azide alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction to install triazoles as both a linker (between the cyclam and the fluorophore components) and as part of the metal-binding receptor unit (Figure 4). Tamanini et al. developed the first such system, mono-naphthalimide 6 as a turn-on probe for Zn2+ [73,74]. Sensor 6 demonstrated excellent selectivity of Zn2+ in competition experiments with other cations in aqueous solvent (pH 7), with a 6-fold enhancement of the emission band at 407 nm upon zinc binding; this probe is effective over a wide range of pH (>4.5). It was postulated that PET from the cyclam/triazole unit to the fluorophore in the free ligand quenches naphthalimide fluorescence, and then Zn2+ binding interferes with this PET process and the fluorescence output is enhanced. Moderate fluorescence quenching was also observed in response to Cu2+ or Hg2+. The utility of this fluorescent sensor has been demonstrated in the detection of increasing free Zn2+ concentrations in apoptotic thymocytes.
Replacing the naphthalimide with a coumarin fluorophore enabled detection of and differentiation between Cu2+ and Hg2+ with the ‘on-off’ cyclam sensor 7, reported by Lau et al. [75]. This probe contains the ‘reversed’ triazole connectivity, in which the pendant fluorophore is connected to the triazole C4 (rather than N1, as in 6), synthesised by combining the fluorophore-alkyne with an azido-cyclam building block. Sensor 7 was selective for Cu2+ and Hg2+ in competition experiments with other cations tested, and responded to these ions with quenching of the fluorescence emission at 389 nm. The observed quenching of fluorescence was rationalised as arising from paramagnetic and heavy metal effects. Zn2+ also bound to this probe, and when present in significant excess (50 fold) interfered slightly with the quenching response to Cu2+ and Hg2+. Differentiation between Cu2+ and Hg2+ was achieved by the addition of S2O32− which to led to the revival of the fluorescence for 7·Hg2+ but not 7·Cu2+. 1H-NMR and MS experiments revealed the demetallation of the 7·Hg2+ complex under these conditions, which reactivates the fluorescence output of 7.
Further work by Ast et al. demonstrated that the triazole connectivity has a marked influence on the fluorescence properties of this class of probes [76,77]. Mononaphthalimide derivative 8 has the ‘reversed’ C4 connectivity to the fluorophore and was found to respond strongly to zinc, like the analogous N1-linked probe 6, showing a 5-fold enhancement of the fluorescence emission at 458 nm in response to Zn2+ in aqueous solvent (pH 7.4). However, fluorescence quantum yield and lifetime measurements revealed that the change in triazole connectivity gave rise to a quantum yield 10 times higher and a fluorescence lifetime 6 times longer for probe 8 than probe 6 (which has the ‘original’ triazole connectivity). Differences in the solvatochromaticity of probes 6 and 8 (in particular, differences in the solvent dependence of their emission wavelengths) indicated that while PET suppression upon Zn2+ binding underpins the turn-on response of 6, the response of probe 8 to Zn2+ arises from interruption of a TICT process by Zn2+ coordination [76]. Additional fluorescence experiments were undertaken at low temperatures with the Zn2+ and Cu2+ complexes of the mono-naphthalimide and coumarin sensors, demonstrating that PET is predominately responsible for the fluorescence response to Zn2+ while quenching due to Cu2+ is due to energy transfer [77].
When a second triazolylnaphthalimide unit was built into the structure, the symmetrical bis-naphthalimide 9 was as selective as the original probe 6 for Zn2+ over a variety of cations tested in 7:3 water/MeCN buffered with HEPES at pH 7; moderate quenching was again observed in response to Cu2+ or Hg2+. The inclusion of a second triazolylnaphthalimide unit in 9 lent this probe twice the fluorescence output of the mononaphthalimide 6: a 12.7-fold fluorescence increase of the emission at 416 nm was observed in response to Zn2+ binding, providing acetonitrile was present in the analyte solution. Wong et al. recently described the synthesis and characterisation of a second bis-naphthalimide 10, the reversed triazole analogue of 9 [78]. In contrast to the previously reported naphthalimide sensors 6, 8 and 9, probe 10 demonstrated poor response to Zn2+ in aqueous solvent (pH 7.4). However, a 22-fold fluorescence enhancement at 420 nm in response to Zn2+ was observed in acetonitrile. Investigation of the photophysical behaviour of bis- and mononaphthalimide systems revealed that both the reversal of triazole connectivity (naphthalimide connected via triazole C4 vs. N1) and incorporation of the second triazolylnaphthalimide unit influence the properties of these probes. With the aid of single crystal X-ray structures, it was postulated that the contrasting photophysical behaviour of these bisnaphthalimide systems arises due to differences in the coordination pattern of the pendant triazoles to Zn2+: while both triazoles coordinate to the metal in the zinc complex of ligand 10, only one of the pendants is bound to zinc in the complex formed by 9.
Yu et al. reported the incorporation of a piperidinyl group at the 4-position of 1,8-naphthalimides in sensors such as 11 and 12 (Figure 5) [79]. These and related probes with reversed triazole connectivity were selective for Cu2+ with significant quenching of the fluorescence emissions around 545–558 nm in aqueous solvent (pH 7.4). Surveying the response of these probes in a range of solvents revealed a high degree of solvatochromaticity, with significant blue-shifts in emission maxima (>50 nm difference) and smaller Stokes shifts (>1300 cm−1 difference) when switching from polar (e.g., water) to non-polar (e.g., toluene) solvents. The potential of these systems for application to biological imaging was investigated with no significant cytotoxicity observed. Attempts to include F-BODIPY fluorophores in systems of this type have hitherto proved unsuccessful, with the conditions required to deprotect the cyclam nitrogen atoms also stripping boron from the fluorophore in the final step of the synthesis [80].
Extending this approach one step further, Yu et al. used the Zn2+ complex 13 of a biotinylated cyclam-naphthalimide ligand to characterise the biotin/avidin binding interaction using fluorescence, i.e., to create a fluorescent probe that responds to the protein avidin [81]. When the complex 13 was introduced to a buffered avidin solution, significant quenching of the fluorescence emission was observed relative to control solutions, but only up to a 4:1 ratio of 13:avidin. This quenching is quantitatively associated with the biotin-avidin binding event, which occurs with a 4:1 stoichiometry [82]. It was proposed that the fluoresence response of 13 to avidin arises from changes in Zn2+-coordination by the biotinylated triazole upon protein binding, which affects the fluorescence mechanisms in operation.
4. Calixarene-Based Sensors
Calixarenes are cyclic phenol oligomers that are characterised by a structurally rigid 3-dimensional scaffold containing an interior cavity; they may adopt different conformations depending on size (the number of repeating units in the macrocycle) and substituents on the upper and lower (OH side) rims of the chalice-like structure. For example calix[4]arenes are comprised of four phenol monomers and can exist as cone, partial-cone, 1,2-alternate or 1,3-alternate conformations (Figure 6); for simple calix[4]arenes the cone conformation is preferred at room temperature, but conformationally mobile [83]. Thus calixarenes may be functionalised to generate molecular probes with various orientations of receptor and/or reporter motifs, and fluorescent chemosensors based on a calixarene core have been developed as robust receptors for a range of different analytes [84,85,86].
The benzothiazole-substituted calix[4]arene 14 bearing a 1,3-alternate conformation (Figure 7) was investigated as a sensor for Cu2+, S2− and HSO4− by Erdemir et al. [87], and found to be an ‘on-off-on’ fluorescence sensor for Cu2+ and S2−. Selective binding of Cu2+ was achieved over an assortment of cations tested and led to the formation of a 1:2 14:Cu2+ complex with a 90-fold decrease in the 542 nm fluorescence emission band upon the addition of 20 equivalents of Cu2+. Addition of a variety of anions to the 14·Cu2+ complex revealed that only S2− led to the revival of fluorescence to the initial level of 14. Additionally, 14 was shown to be an ‘off-on’ sensor for HSO4− over a variety of anions (including OH−, vide infra) in competitive binding experiments with a 10-fold fluorescence enhancement after the addition of up to 50 equivalents of HSO4−. 1H-NMR and FTIR experiments revealed that after the addition of HSO4−, the imine is hydrolysed and the benzothiazole fluorophore cleaved off to generate the benzothiazole aldehyde, which is highly emissive.
The same group have reported a calix-aza-crown based sensor 15 for the detection of Hg2+ in biological imaging, in which a perylene fluorophore is appended to two calix[4]arene moieties via an aza-crown bridge (Figure 8) [88]. The sensor 15 demonstrated high selectivity towards Hg2+ over a variety of different cations tested in competition experiments and fluorescence titrations revealed a 14-fold fluorescence enhancement of emission at 536 and 576 nm upon the addition of 100 equivalents of Hg2+, via the formation of a 2:1 Hg2+:15 complex. Each Hg2+ ion was complexed to 15 via three aza-crown nitrogens and a perylene nitrogen, and this binding disrupts the PET process from the aza-crown nitrogens to the perylene fluorophore, leading to a fluorescence increase. The sensor 15 was successfully used to image Hg2+ in spiked SW-620 cells.
The incorporation of a 1,2,3-triazole as both the linker and part of the receptor in the bis-nitrobenzoxadiazole (NBD) substituted calix[4]arene structure 16 (Figure 9) has been reported to afford a sensor for Ag+ and formaldehyde (HCHO) [89]. Alkylation of the precursor calixarene phenols with propargyl bromide followed by CuAAC to attach the NBD azide afforded sensor 16, which was selective for Ag+ over a variety of cations tested. Upon binding with Ag+, a fluorescence decrease of the 527 nm emission was observed, along with the emergence of a new emission band at 576 nm with a 14-fold fluorescence increase at this wavelength. Furthermore, the silver complex 16·Ag+ was able to act as a sensor for HCHO via reduction of the Ag+ to regenerate the original emission profile of free ligand 16, with no loss of sensitivity over five iterations of the Ag+/HCHO detection cycle. Titration experiments followed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy suggested that binding of Ag+ to sensor 16 occurs via the N3 nitrogens of the two triazoles and this consequently brings together the triazole-NBD fluorophore chains, resulting in the new excimer emission band at 576 nm.
The anthraquinone/calix[4]arene derivative 17 incorporating a similar bis-triazole moiety has been reported by Zhan et al. [90]. Selective binding of sensor 17 to Ca2+ was achieved over a variety of other cations and yielded a significant increase in the fluorescence emission at 510 nm. Job’s plot, 1H-NMR and MS experiments confirmed the formation of a 1:1 complex, with Ca2+ coordinating to the triazole nitrogens, an interaction facilitated by the flexible ether linkers. This coordination results in disruption of PET from the triazole to the anthraquinone fluorophore, leading to the observed fluorescence increase after Ca2+ binding. Furthermore, the 17·Ca2+ complex was found to be a selective sensor for F− over other halides, with the addition of F− leading to fluorescence quenching and revival of the original emission profile of 17 via displacement of the bound Ca2+ to form CaF2.
Calix[4]arene probe 18 (Figure 9), functionalised with anthracene fluorophores via triazole linkers, has been reported by Mummidivarapu et al. for sensing Co2+ [91]. This probe was found to be selective for Co2+ over a variety of cations tested and gave a 5-fold decrease of the 417 nm emission band with a calculated detection limit of 0.92 µM. Complexation of 18 with Co2+ formed a 1:1 complex, confirmed by Job’s plot and MS analysis. The binding mode was determined by 1H-NMR titration and DFT calculations which revealed that the triazole plays an important role in coordination of the Co2+, which binds to the triazole N3 nitrogen and the four oxygens of the calix[4]arene.
The Rao group reported benzimidazole-triazole substituted calix[4]arene 19 (Figure 9) which functions as an ‘off-on-off’ probe dependent on the concentration of Cu2+ [92]. This system was shown to be selective for Cu2+ via the formation of 1:1 and 2:1 Cu2+:19 complexes and displayed no significant change in competition experiments with the other cations tested. DFT calculations suggested that in both complexes, a Cu2+ ion is coordinated to the triazole N1 nitrogens and benzimidazole nitrogens, while in the 2:1 complex, the second Cu2+ binds to the triazole and calix[4]arene oxygens in an analogous manner to that seen in the 18·Co2+ complex. Probe 19 gives a ratiometric fluorescence response to Cu2+, with the addition of up to three equivalents leading to quenching of the original emission maximum at 311 nm along with the appearance of an excimer emission band at 380 nm. Further addition of Cu2+ leads to formation of the 2:1 complex with quenching of the 380 nm excimer band in addition to further decreases to the 311 nm emission.
More recently, Maity et al. reported a ruthenium(II)-bipyridine-substituted calix[4]arene sensor 20 for the detection of CN− (Figure 10) [93]. Of a range of sodium salts tested, NaCN alone led to fluorescence quenching and a blue-shift of the emission band at 624 nm (in 95:5 H2O:MeCN). However, when tetrabutylammonium (TBA) salts of the same anions were tested, TBACN gave a similar fluorescence quenching response, while a fluorescence enhancement was observed upon addition of TBAOAc. The binding was studied using MS and 1H-NMR and it was found that two CN− ions or a single AcO− ion coordinate to the amides of the sensor 20 as 2:1 and 1:1 complexes respectively. The differences in selectivity between the Na+ and TBA+ salts arise due to the steric environment around the lower rim of the calixarene structure and the amides of 20. The smaller Na+ can bind to the lower rim calixarene phenols, thus presenting a sterically challenging environment which hampers coordination of the larger anion AcO− to the amides. Conversely, the larger TBA+ cation is not bound to the lower rim and thus coordination of AcO− to the amides can occur. The sensor 20 has been successfully applied in more complex systems with the sensing of CN− in spiked drinking water and saliva, achieved with excellent recovery of the doped analyte.
D’Urso et al. have reported the synthesis of a water soluble octa-anionic calix[4]arene 21 as a sensor for the tetramine spermine 22 (Figure 10) which is responsible for the regulation of cell growth [94]. The binding of 21 with tetra-protonated spermine [22·H4]4+ was investigated by fluorescence titration which revealed the formation of 2:1 and 1:1 21:[22·H4]4+ complexes and displayed quenching of the fluorescence emission at 310 nm. Further investigation by single crystal X-ray crystallography revealed that the 1:1 binding mode involves the spermine partially hosted inside the cavity of 21 via salt-bridge interactions with the sulfate groups of the upper rim. In contrast, the 2:1 binding mode involves hydrogen bonding and electrostatic attractions with the carboxylate groups on the lower rim.
Using the larger calix[8]arene, Carrillo-Carrión et al. have determined C60 fullerene concentrations using fluorescent quantum dots (QDs) [95]. CdSe/ZnS QDs bearing trioctylphosphine oxide chains on the surface were reacted with p-tert-butylcalix[8]arene to give a CdSe/ZnS-calix[8]arene coated sensor, with the optimal calix/QD ratio determined to be 12.5:1. Significant quenching of the QD fluorescence is observed when C60-fullerene is encapsulated inside the calixarene cavity to form the complex 23 (Figure 10). This probe has been applied to environmental studies with the successful detection of C60 from a doped river water sample achieved with excellent percentage recovery of the doped analyte and a low detection limit of 5 µg/L.
5. Cyclodextrin Based Sensors
Cyclodextrins (CDs) are cyclic oligosaccharides composed of α-glucopyranose monomers linked at the 1 and 4 positions, with the three major cyclodextrins bearing 6 (α-CD), 7 (β-CD), or 8 (γ-CD) glucopyranose units [96,97]. The glucopyranose units are arranged to form a cone shape (Figure 11) in which the secondary hydroxyl groups are located on the wider opening and primary hydroxyl groups on the narrower aperture. The interior of a CD is hydrophobic, while the exterior is hydrophilic. As a result CDs are water soluble, but also able to form inclusion complexes with hydrophobic entities inside the cavity; both of these properties are central to their role in molecular probes [98]. With fluorophores covalently linked to the CD or complexed within the cavity, chemosensors with affinity for a variety of analytes can be developed.
An inclusion complex of a coumarin derivative in β-CD was reported for the sensing of Cu2+ by Khan et al. (Figure 11) [99]. Molecular modelling suggested that the structure of the water soluble 24·β-CD complex contains the benzothiazole group encapsulated inside the β-CD cavity while the coumarin component of 24 protrudes outside. This 24·β-CD complex is selective for Cu2+ over a variety of cations in competition experiments and undergoes quenching of the 465 nm emission band after the addition of Cu2+. The 24·β-CD complex was confirmed to bind to Cu2+ as a 1:1 complex by construction of a Job’s plot. Computational studies suggested that the Cu2+ ion is coordinated to one primary hydroxyl group of the β-CD, the benzothiazole nitrogen, the sulfur linker and the 5-hydroxyl group of the coumarin. The 24·β-CD complex was shown to be an effective ‘on-off’ sensor for use in fluorescence confocal microscopy, visualising intracellular Cu2+ in doped HeLa cells.
The triazole-tetraphenylethylene (TPE) substituted β-CD 25 has been reported as a highly sensitive sensor for Cd2+ exhibiting selectivity for Cd2+ in 1:1 water/DMSO solution and returning a significant fluorescence increase at 476 nm over a variety of other competing cations tested [100]. The exception in the competition assay was Ag+, which significantly dampened the fluorescence emission in response to Cd2+. The sensing mechanism of 25 was proposed to hinge on an aggregation induced emission (AIE) process, a proposal supported by fluorescence emission changes when the water content of the solvent system was varied. As the free ligand 25 is poorly soluble in water, it aggregates and is inherently fluorescent in ≥80% water/DMSO solutions, while the 25·Cd2+ complex afforded no fluorescence output in ≤20% water/DMSO solution; thus the 50% water/DMSO system was used as it provided maximal fluorescence change upon Cd2+ binding. Metal binding yields a 2:1 complex, confirmed by a Job’s plot analysis, and was proposed to involve coordination of Cd2+ to two molecules of 25, via the triazole N2 nitrogen and a primary hydroxyl group of the β-CD from two different ligand molecules.
A water soluble β-CD for fluorescence sensing of Zn2+ in biological systems was developed by Liu et al. (Figure 12) [101]. Probe 26 was proposed to bind Zn2+ selectively through coordination to the 5 amines and the hydroxyl group derived from the diethylamino salicylaldehyde moiety, giving a significant fluorescence enhancement and blue shift from 460 nm to 410 nm in water; the addition of other cations gave no significant fluorescence changes. This sensor was able to penetrate the cell membrane of onion epidermal cells in fluorescence microscopy studies and significant changes to its emission profile as per the in vitro fluorescence studies were evident upon treatment of these cells with Zn2+.
A bis-β-CD with coordinating triazoles bridged with a phenanthroline fluorophore has been reported as a highly sensitive sensor for Zn2+ (Figure 12) [102]. The sensor 27 demonstrated significant fluorescence enhancement and a red-shift from 368 to 377 nm in response to Zn2+, with a calculated detection limit of 0.49 µM. Furthermore, the addition of adamantane carboxylic acid (AdCA) resulted in formation of an inclusion complex 27·AdCA which displayed even greater binding affinity for Zn2+ and a lowered limit of detection of 0.34 µM. This increased affinity was proposed to arise from the extra coordination of the carboxylate groups of the 27·AdCA inclusion complex, in addition to coordination of the phenanthroline nitrogens and the two triazole N3 nitrogens to Zn2+. Consequently, PET from the triazole nitrogens to the phenanthroline was inhibited, leading to the observed fluorescence changes.
The high affinity of adamantyl groups for β-CD has also been used for sensing H2PO4− ions, by combining sensor 28 (Figure 13) with β-CD [103]. Probe 28 gave rise to a strong fluorescence signal at 500 nm in response to H2PO4−, showing good selectivity over a variety of other anions (halides, OH−, NO3− and AcO−). This signal is consistent with the general excimer emission of anthracene fluorophores. These fluorescence results and supporting 1H-NMR spectroscopic data suggested formation of a 28·H2PO4− exciplex via stacking of anthracene fluorophores between 28 units. When β-CD was added to the 28·H2PO4− complex, stacking of anthracene units was disrupted, leading to quenching of the exciplex band and a blue shift of the emission wavelength (to 440 nm, which corresponds to the monomer emission of the anthracene fluorophore). No significant fluorescence enhancement was observed when the order of addition was reversed (β-CD, then H2PO4−), suggesting that the 28·β-CD inclusion complex inhibits assembly of the 28·H2PO4− exciplex.
Several heavy metal sensors have been developed using substituted β-CDs. Anthracene-substituted β-CD sensor 29 has been reported to be a sensor for Pb2+ by Antony et al. [104]. Fluorescence quenching was observed upon the addition of a large variety of cations to 29, but a fluorescence enhancement of the 537 nm emission band was observed only after the addition of Pb2+. This is likely due to CT from the nitrogen atoms to the anthracene fluorophore. Competitive binding experiments with other quenching cations revealed no significant decrease in the fluorescence response to Pb2+, but a small enhancement from Fe2+. This suggests that only Pb2+ binds strongly to 29, via coordination to the two nitrogen atoms in the linker to form a 1:1 complex; this was confirmed by a Job’s plot analysis.
Kanagaraj et al. reported the sensing of Hg2+ using a naphthamide β-CD inclusion complex 30 (Figure 13) via colorimetric detection and fluorescence [105]. Sensor 30 consists of a 3-hydroxy-N-phenyl-2-naphthamide encapsulated inside the hexaamino derivative per-6-amino-6-β-CD; this system demonstrated high selectivity for Hg2+ over a variety of cations. Binding of Hg2+ led to absorption profile changes along with a blue shift in fluorescence emission from 577 to 509 nm and quenching of emission intensity, with a low detection limit of 1 pM. The fluorescence quenching effect was attributed to the disruption of excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT). The original fluorescence shown by 30 is due to photoinduced tautomerism of the naphthamide from its enol form ground state to the keto form excited state by proton transfer and subsequent radiative decay to afford fluorescence emission. As Hg2+ is coordinated to 30 through the phenoxide oxygen and amide NH of the naphthamide, ESIPT is disrupted and fluorescence quenching occurs. Environmental applications of the sensor 30 were also demonstrated with doped Hg2+ in real world water samples.
CD-based chemosensors have also been developed for the detection of explosives in environmental samples. Feng et al. reported the synthesis of a per-6-amino-6-β-CD analogue functionalised with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) to form the thiourea-linked fluorescein/β-CD derivative 31, and evaluated its potential as a probe for 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) in water (Figure 13) [106]. The addition of TNT to 31 gives rise to quenching of the 519 nm emission, to a calculated detection limit of 20 nM. The high selectivity of 31 for TNT over a variety of cations found in the environment and the structurally similar dinitrotoluene (DNT) is due to coordination of the amines of 31 to TNT via formation of a Meisenheimer complex. The observed fluorescence changes arise due to FRET with effective overlap of the fluorescein fluorophore’s emission profile with the absorption profile of the 31·TNT complex, which is non-fluorescent.
6. Crown Ether-Based Sensors
Crown ethers are cyclic polyethers which were first reported in 1967 by Pedersen, who subsequently shared the Nobel Prize in 1987 for work in this area [107]. They are oligomers of ethylene glycol which bind strongly to a variety of alkali metal or transition metal cations depending on the size of the macrocyclic ‘crown’ and its central cavity, and have found many applications as sensors, molecular switches and ion chromatographic media [108].
Diao et al. recently reported a rhodamine-crown ether derivative 32 as a fluorescent sensor for Cr3+ (Figure 14) [109]. The high selectivity of this sensor was demonstrated in a screen of environmentally relevant cations, in which only Cr3+ produced a strong fluorescence enhancement at 556 nm, while a weak enhancement was observed from Fe3+. Additionally, the absorption spectra for the Cr3+·32 mixtures showed an increase of a typical rhodamine absorption band at 532 nm. The observed changes to the absorption and emission profiles result from the formation of a 2:1 Cr3+:32 complex by the coordination of two Cr3+ ions to the crown ethers, imine and amide groups, which triggers spirolactam ring opening of the rhodamine. Application of the sensor 32 to the detection of Cr3+ in drinking water was demonstrated with spiked Cr3+ samples to a detection limit of 1.5 µM. This sensor was extended to fluorescence imaging in biological samples where the sensor 32 was shown to penetrate cell membranes and fluoresce in response to incubation with Cr3+.
The coumarin-substituted phenylaza-crown ether 33 (Figure 14), which is constructed around a coordinating triazole by a CuAAC reaction, was reported to be a selective sensor for Hg2+, Fe3+ and Cr3+ [110]. The selectivity of sensor 33 for cations was contingent on the solvent, with a strong fluorescence enhancement at 475 nm in response to Fe3+ in water, but a weaker response to Hg2+ and Cr3+; in contrast in ethanol strong fluorescence enhancement to Hg2+ and weaker response to Fe3+ and Cr3+ was observed. 1H-NMR spectroscopic experiments on the 33·Hg2+ complex demonstrated significant downfield movement of the triazole, phenyl and crown ether protons compared with the parent ligand 33. Molecular energy minimisation calculations revealed that the triazole-coumarin bond is twisted at ca. 30° and this was proposed to act as a ‘virtual’ spacer which enables the PET mechanism. Consequently, coordination of the crown ether and triazole to Hg2+ via formation of a 1:1 complex decreases the electron density of the aniline-crown unit and subsequently hinders PET, leading to the observed fluorescence enhancement.
A fluorene-substituted crown-ether 34 has been reported by Chen et al. as a fluorescence ‘off-on’ sensor for Cu2+ (Figure 14) [111]. This imine-connected sensor was found to be highly selective for Cu2+ in competitive binding experiments with a variety of other cations, and was highly sensitive with a ca. 54-fold fluorescence enhancement upon Cu2+ binding and a small blue-shift of the emission from 371 to 380 nm. Fluorescence pH titration, Job’s plot and MS experiments revealed 1:1 binding stoichiometry with Cu2+ coordinated in a sandwich complex with the crown ether oxygens and the imine nitrogen of another molecule of 34. The exceptional fluorescence response of 34 to Cu2+ was proposed to occur via the inhibition of both PET and C=N isomerisation quenching processes after complexation.
Wang et al. have reported the tetra-crown ether/ TPE probe 35 which responds to K+ (Figure 15) [112]. Sensor 35 was synthesised by a thiol-ene reaction between a thiol-substituted TPE and a maleimide-substituted benzo-15-crown-5. This probe was found to be selective for K+ over different potentially interfering cations (Li+, Na+, NH4+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Pb2+), with up to 9.5-fold fluorescence enhancement at 460 nm. The binding of K+ to the crown ether receptors of 35 was confirmed by a Job’s plot to involve formation of a 1:2 complex of K+ with the crown ether moieties. This leads to sandwich complexes of K+ with the different crown ethers, cross-linking the individual units of 35 in solution. Subsequent fluorescence quenching and restoration of the original emission spectrum of 35 upon addition of the unfunctionalised receptor, benzo-15-crown-5 to the 35·K+ complex was observed; this supports an AIE mechanism, arising via the restriction of intramolecular rotation of the individual sensor units 35.
Depauw et al. have investigated the sensing of Cs+ using BODIPY-substituted calixarene-crown ether probes 36 and 37 (Figure 15) [113]. Upon the binding of Cs+ into the crown ether moiety of 36, only very small increases to the fluorescence emission and quantum yield were observed, along with a red shift of the emission. In contrast, the less substituted BODIPY probe 37 gave a more pronounced fluorescence enhancement, red-shifted to 581 nm, and an increase in quantum yield. Theoretical calculations have attributed these differences to the position at which the BODIPY fluorophores are linked to the phenyl-crown ether receptor. In sensor 36, the phenyl group is connected to the BODIPY via the meso position, and the aromatic systems are not coplanar with each other; this results in disrupted conjugation. In contrast, connection at the α-position as in 37 allows the phenyl-crown system to be conjugated with the BODIPY fluorophore.
Crown ether-based sensors have also been used for the detection of anions. Yang et al. reported a triazole-linked anthracene substituted sugar-aza-crown ether sensor 38 for the detection of HSO4− in methanol (Figure 16) [114]. The sensor 38 was highly selective for HSO4−, giving a significant fluorescence increase of the anthracene emission compared to the other competing anions tested (F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, NO3−, H2PO4−, AcO−) upon the formation of a 1:1 complex. 1H-NMR spectroscopic experiments demonstrated large downfield movements of the anthracene and triazole protons, suggesting coordination of HSO4− to the triazole CH; this was confirmed by DFT calculations which revealed a lengthened triazole CH bond, supporting the proposal that the triazole CH functions as a hydrogen bond donor, an effect made possible due to the polarisation of the CH bond by the three triazole nitrogen atoms [115].
Liu et al. have reported a crown-based silver complex for sensing I− [116]. The sensor 39 is an N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complex, with Ag+ coordinated to a bis-benzimidazolium system linked with an ether bridge. Fluorescence competition and titration experiments revealed the high selectivity of sensor 39 for the TBA+ salt of I−, with significant fluorescence quenching of the 362 nm peak upon the addition of up to 20 equivalents of I−, while no significant change to fluorescence emission was evident upon the addition of other anions (other halides, H2PO4−, HSO4−, AcO− and NO3−) and counter-cations (K+, Na+, NH4+, Cu+ and Hg2+). Based on 1H-NMR, MS and FTIR experiments, I− was proposed to coordinate to the Ag+ of 39 as a 1:1 complex leading to fluorescence quenching by an MLCT process.
7. Other Macrocyclic Sensors
Sugar-based macrocycles containing a BODIPY fluorophore (40 and 41) have been reported as fluorescent sensors for both cations and anions (Figure 17), and were made utilising a CuAAC for the final macrocyclisation step [117]. Both probes demonstrated fluorescence quenching of the BODIPY emission peak at 515 nm in response to anions F− and CN− over a variety of other anions, and to Cu2+ and Fe3+ over other cations. The fluorescence quenching was investigated by 11B- and 19F-NMR spectroscopic experiments which revealed the disappearance of the BF2 signal upon the addition of F− and CN−, suggesting quenching was due to the stripping of the BF2 moiety from BODIPY. Additional photophysical experiments with open-chain click precursors to sensors 40 and 41 revealed that triazole coordination is responsible for Cu2+ binding while the carbonyl groups were likely to be responsible for the coordination to Fe3+ [117].
Two macrocyclic systems (Figure 18) have been developed as the basis of new selective sensors for pyrophosphate (PPi) anions. By itself, TPE-based imidazolium macrocycle 42 did not respond to any of the anions tested, including PPi, in a solution of 0.5% DMSO in water. However, the inclusion of one equivalent of Zn(OAc)2 in the solution led to a large fluorescence enhancement at 472 nm in the presence of PPi [118]. Competition experiments with other anions revealed no significant changes to emission. Other divalent cations (Cu2+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Co2+ and Cd2+) were tested but none approached the efficacy of Zn2+ at eliciting a fluorescence response to PPi. The size of the cavity in 42 is able to accommodate PPi as a 1:1 complex, a binding event that is driven by electrostatic attraction between the two positively charged imidazoliums and two of the negative charges on the pyrophosphate. The Zn2+ ion binds between the PPi components of up to four different 42·PPi complexes to form aggregates of [42·PPi]4–Zn complexes which fluoresce by AIE.
Mesquita et al. recently reported PPi sensing with the zinc complex of methylquinoline-substituted azamacrocycle 43 (Figure 18) [119]. This system demonstrated exceptional selectivity and sensitivity for PPi over a variety of competing anions including other phosphorous-based anions, with a 21-fold fluorescence increase and small (10 nm) blue shift to 370 nm upon the addition of one equivalent of PPi. Binding takes place by coordination of two oxygens of the phosphoryl groups to the two Zn2+ ions bound inside the azamacrocycle, resulting in fluorescence enhancement due to changes to ICT in the quinolone ring.
The penta-azamacrocycles 44 and 45, which are appended with a BOIDPY fluorophore, been reported as ‘off-on’ sensors for Mn2+ (Figure 19) [120]. Selectivity for Mn2+ was observed, but some interactions with Zn2+ and Cu2+ were also evident. Binding of Mn2+ afforded 52- and 28-fold fluorescence enhancement of the BODIPY emission band at 508 nm for sensors 44 and 45 respectively which is significantly higher than the increase due to Zn2+ and Cu2+ binding. Mn2+ was shown to form 1:1 44·Mn2+ and 1:2 45·Mn2+ complexes, with Mn2+ binding inside the azamacrocycle and coordinating to two or four methyl esters. Consequently, these sensors fluoresce because PET from the azamacrocycle to the BODIPY unit is disrupted. The two sensors were applied to fluorescence confocal microscopy, and used to visualise Mn2+ localisation in doped HEK 293T cells.
8. Non-Macrocyclic Sensors
The diphenylimidazole substituted BINOL compound 46 has been reported as a sensor for Zn2+ (Figure 19) [121]. A variety of cations were tested and it was demonstrated that while Zn2+, Cu2+ and Hg2+ led to the quenching of the fluorescence emission at 549 nm, only Zn2+ gave rise to a new emission band at 427 nm. Fluorescence titrations with Zn2+ demonstrated the sensor 46 is a good ratiometric sensor, with linear relationships between the emissions at 427 and 549 nm and Zn2+ concentrations below 10 µM, via formation of a 1:1 complex. These ratiometric changes to the emission profile were proposed to result from inhibition of ESIPT upon Zn2+ binding to the phenol oxygen atoms and imidazole nitrogen atoms of 46.
Adachi et al. reported the sensing of vitamin K4 47 using a dendrimer-based sensor 48 which incorporates a fluorene fluorophore (Figure 20) [122]. A 13-fold fluorescence increase at 340 nm was observed in response to the addition of vitamin K4, along with a small fluorescence decrease in the excimer emission band at 440 nm. This fluorescence enhancement was rationalised by intermolecular energy transfer from the naphthalene branches of sensor 48 to target 47, which is bound within the naphthalene branches of 48 by π–π interactions. This encapsulation of 47 also results in disruption of the original naphthalene-naphthalene stacked excimer emission of 48.
Li et al. have reported the sensing of CN− with a benzothiazole-based sensor incorporating a pyrene fluorophore (Figure 21) [123]. Sensor 49 was highly selective for CN− over a variety of competing anions and demonstrated a significant fluorescence enhancement and blue shift from 604 nm to 470 nm, along with colorimetric changes to its absorption profile. The mechanism of action was investigated by 1H-NMR spectroscopy and MS, revealing that CN− reacts with sensor 49 by nucleophilic addition to the benzothiazole C=N bond to form 50. This results in the suppression of ICT leading to the ratiometric change in emission. Sensor 49 was effective between pH 5 and 9 and its application was successfully demonstrated using test strips of filter paper soaked with 49 which, upon exposure to CN− solutions, produced colour changes detectable by eye and when visualised under 365 nm illumination.
The BODIPY-substituted boranate ester 51 has been reported to differentiate between CN− and F− anions (Figure 21) [124]. Significant colorimetric and fluorescence emission changes were seen upon the addition of CN− or F−, changes unaffected by the presence of other species including competing anions (halides, AcO−, HSO4−, H2SO4−, NO3−, ClO4−). Fluorescence titrations revealed that F− induced quenching and blue shift of the emission band of 51 from 599 nm to 579 nm, along with the appearance of two new emission bands centred at 509 nm and 639 nm. In contrast, CN− induced quenching and blue shift to 575 nm while a single new emission band appeared at 478 nm. The difference in photophysical response was proposed to arise from differences between the boron Lewis acidic binding sites on 51. 1H-NMR spectroscopic experiments suggested that CN− binds at the BODIPY moiety, leading to the displacement of BF2 while F− binds at both the BF2 and the pinacol boron atom to generate an sp3 hybridised boronate ion.
Quantum dot (QD)/aminonaphthalimide (ANI) conjugates have been studied by Ast et al. and evaluated as pH probes (Figure 22) [125,126]. The QD-ANI conjugate 52 was assembled by a mass-driven ligand exchange process which attached the ANI dyes onto the surface of the QD via the displacement of capping ligands on the QD, with the naphthalimide-thiols generated in situ from their disulfide dimers. It was found that the fluorescence output of the Cd-SeS-ZnS QD at 571 nm was enhanced by the attachment of ANI fluorophores, via FRET from the dye to the dot. The QD-ANI 52 functioned as a pH probe, with a sigmoidal relationship between its integrated emission intensity and pH, and increasing fluorescence intensity at lower pH. The increase in fluorescence intensity at lower pH was rationalised by the interruption of PET from the dimethylamino group into the naphthalimide in ANI due to protonation, which modulates FRET from the dye to the QD.
9. Conclusions and Outlook
Over the past few years, the already large and diverse collection of synthetic fluorescent sensors has continued to expand rapidly, with many new probes developed by combining a range of binding moieties with various fluorescent reporters. These sensors operate via a variety binding modes and different mechanisms of fluorescence response, allowing the selective detection of numerous analytes from cations and anions to small molecules and biomolecules. However, many challenges remain to improve substrate scope and selectivity, tolerance to pH, temperature and solvent, and other subtle nuances of probe behaviour to enable their broad application in complex, real-world systems.
Of the more than 60 sensor systems discussed in this review, 60% are probes for cations, 27% respond to anions, and the remaining 13% signal the presence of other species. There is a relative abundance of probes for Zn2+, Cu2+ and Hg2+, with 21 (35%) of the systems discussed responding to one or more of these three metal ions; in comparison, we have discussed two probes each for Cr3+, Mn2+ and Fe3+, and one for each of H+, K+, Ca2+, Co2+, Ag+, Cd2+, Cs+ and Pb2+. Amongst the anion probes four respond to CN−, three to F−, two each to HSO4−, S2− and PPi, and one each to HS−, H2PO4− and I−. The probes for ‘other species’ comprise three for small molecules (nitroxyl (2) and formaldehyde) and one for each of the larger entities biotin, spermine, buckminsterfullerene, TNT and vitamin K4. Clearly there is an uneven distribution of capacity here, and a great many important potential substrates—both biomedically and environmentally relevant species—are not represented at all. This unevenness reflects in part the relative difficulty of designing receptors that specifically bind neutral molecules or anions compared to systems that bind positively charged species, versus the relative abundance of readily accessible macrocyclic receptors with high affinity for first-row transition metal cations. However, this situation also arises in part from a tendency towards synthesis-driven ‘retrofitting’ of probes to targets, whereby probes are made using established synthetic methods that allow the modular combination of receptor and transducer components, then the optimal substrate determined via a screening process. The alternative ‘bottom up’ design and synthesis of probes for specific substrates is more challenging—particularly when it comes to substrates for which high affinity binding motifs must first be established—but ultimately more sensors of this ilk are required to expand the range of substrates that can be monitored with fluorescent probes.
The wider uptake and application of these systems into general usage is another key unmet challenge. As recently discussed in more detail elsewhere, very few of the fluorescent probes reported in the literature ever find broad application [5]. Indeed the majority are never discussed again beyond the initial publication reporting their synthesis and evaluation. In addition to expanding the range of substrates that can be followed, meeting the challenge of genuine utility in biological contexts requires a greater focus on probes that emit in the infrared or near-infrared region of the spectrum and are thus ‘visible’ in vivo [127], plus greater emphasis on ratiometric systems (vide supra), which mitigate against variations in probe concentration that are difficult to avoid in complex biological systems. Greater attention to solubility in aqueous systems is also necessary, towards development of a broad suite of water-compatible probes; while some of the systems detailed in this review do indeed function under genuinely aqueous and physiologically relevant conditions, others use ‘aqueous conditions’ that in fact contain as little as 20% v/v H2O. Lastly, a broader and more subtle array of methods for targeting probes to specific cell types, extracellular and subcellular locations is also needed to extend the usefulness of these systems in biological experiments [5,128,129].
Other exciting developments are unfolding apace, including the use of multiple fluorescent reporters in sensing arrays, and combining small-molecule chemosensors with smartphone detectors as portable spectrophotometers for remote measurement. By using an array of sensors and then analysing their fluorescence responses statistically, it becomes possible to identify distinctive response patterns for each analyte and thus circumvent selectivity limitations of the individual chemosensors when used in isolation [130]. Combining this approach with the development of multi-channel sensors capable of detecting more than one analyte at a time [131], highly robust sensor arrays can be envisaged.
Meanwhile rapid developments in smartphone technologies, particularly improvements in processing power and the quality of camera CMOS sensors, are enabling the application of these ubiquitous devices as highly portable spectrometers for real-time fluorescence-based monitoring and analysis of analytes on-site [132,133,134]. While a performance gap remains between smartphone systems and laboratory spectrometers with regards to sensitivity and detection limits, continued hardware improvements, coupled with advances in 3D printing and other enabling technologies, will alleviate this. Smartphone based systems offer real promise for affordable, portable fluorescence-based sensing applications in the near future.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Australian Research Council (DP120104035) and the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1084266) for funding our research in this area. Joseph K.-H. Wong was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award (APA) from the Australian Government. Peter J. Rutledge thanks David R. Spring, The Department of Chemistry, and Trinity College Cambridge for supporting a sabbatical visit to the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, July 2016–January 2017.
Author Contributions
Joseph K.-H. Wong, Peter J. Rutledge and Matthew H. Todd wrote and edited the manuscript from an original draft by Joseph K.-H. Wong.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding agencies who supported this work had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.
References
- 1.Hulanicki A., Glab S., Ingman F. Chemical sensors: Definitions and classification. Pure Appl. Chem. 1991;63:1247. doi: 10.1351/pac199163091247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Czarnik A.W. Fluorescent Chemosensors for Ion and Molecule Recognition. Volume 538. American Chemical Society; Washington, DC, USA: 1993. p. 252. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Janata J. Principles of Chemical Sensors. Springer; Boston, MA, USA: 2009. Introduction to Sensors; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Basabe-Desmonts L., Reinhoudt D.N., Crego-Calama M. Design of fluorescent materials for chemical sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:993–1017. doi: 10.1039/b609548h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.New E.J. Harnessing the Potential of Small Molecule Intracellular Fluorescent Sensors. ACS Sens. 2016;1:328–333. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.6b00148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ng S.M., Koneswaran M., Narayanaswamy R. A review on fluorescent inorganic nanoparticles for optical sensing applications. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2016;6:21624–21661. doi: 10.1039/C5RA24987B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chang C.J., Gunnlaugsson T., James T.D. Imaging agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:4484–4486. doi: 10.1039/C5CS90065D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chang C.J., Gunnlaugsson T., James T.D. Sensor targets. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:4176–4178. doi: 10.1039/C5CS90058A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li C., Shi G. Carbon nanotube-based fluorescence sensors. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C. 2014;19:20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ma D.-L., Ma V.P.-Y., Chan D.S.-H., Leung K.-H., He H.-Z., Leung C.-H. Recent advances in luminescent heavy metal complexes for sensing. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012;256:3087–3113. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Resch-Genger U., Grabolle M., Cavaliere-Jaricot S., Nitschke R., Nann T. Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nat. Methods. 2008;5:763–775. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lau Y.H., Rutledge P.J., Watkinson M., Todd M.H. Chemical sensors that incorporate click-derived triazoles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:2848–2866. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00143k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fabbrizzi L., Licchelli M., Mancin F., Pizzeghello M., Rabaioli G., Taglietti A., Tecilla P., Tonellato U. Fluorescence Sensing of Ionic Analytes in Water: From Transition Metal Ions to Vitamin B13. Chem. Eur. J. 2002;8:94–101. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20020104)8:1<94::AID-CHEM94>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fabbrizzi L., Poggi A. Sensors and switches from supramolecular chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995;24:197–202. doi: 10.1039/cs9952400197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Snowden T.S., Anslyn E.V. Anion recognition: Synthetic receptors for anions and their application in sensors. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999;3:740–746. doi: 10.1016/S1367-5931(99)00034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wiskur S.L., Ait-Haddou H., Lavigne J.J., Anslyn E.V. Teaching Old Indicators New Tricks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001;34:963–972. doi: 10.1021/ar9600796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.World Health Organisation . Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. 4th ed. World Health Organisation; Geneva, Switzerland: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Järup L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br. Med. Bull. 2003;68:167–182. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Montes S., Rivera-Mancia S., Diaz-Ruiz A., Tristan-Lopez L., Rios C. Copper and Copper Proteins in Parkinson’s Disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2014;2014:147251. doi: 10.1155/2014/147251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jomova K., Vondrakova D., Lawson M., Valko M. Metals, oxidative stress and neurodegenerative disorders. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2010;345:91–104. doi: 10.1007/s11010-010-0563-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhao Y., Zhang X.-B., Han Z.-X., Qiao L., Li C.-Y., Jian L.-X., Shen G.-L., Yu R.-Q. Highly Sensitive and Selective Colorimetric and Off–On Fluorescent Chemosensor for Cu2+ in Aqueous Solution and Living Cells. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:7022–7030. doi: 10.1021/ac901127n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shen C., Kolanowski J.L., Tran C.M.N., Kaur A., Akerfeldt M.C., Rahme M.S., Hambley T.W., New E.J. A ratiometric fluorescent sensor for the mitochondrial copper pool. Metallomics. 2016;8:915–919. doi: 10.1039/C6MT00083E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cakic M., Mitic Z., Nikolic G., Savic I., Savic I.M. Design and optimization of drugs used to treat copper deficiency. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2013;8:1253–1263. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2013.825245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Meaney M.S., McGuffin V.L. Luminescence-based methods for sensing and detection of explosives. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008;391:2557–2576. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2194-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Salinas Y., Martinez-Manez R., Marcos M.D., Sancenon F., Costero A.M., Parra M., Gil S. Optical chemosensors and reagents to detect explosives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:1261–1296. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15173H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sun X., Wang Y., Lei Y. Fluorescence based explosive detection: From mechanisms to sensory materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:8019–8061. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00496A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yue G., Su S., Li N., Shuai M., Lai X., Astruc D., Zhao P. Gold nanoparticles as sensors in the colorimetric and fluorescence detection of chemical warfare agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016;311:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Beer P.D., Gale P.A. Anion Recognition and Sensing: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:486–516. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010202)40:3<486::AID-ANIE486>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cametti M., Rissanen K. Recognition and sensing of fluoride anion. Chem. Commun. 2009:2809–2829. doi: 10.1039/b902069a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Duke R.M., Veale E.B., Pfeffer F.M., Kruger P.E., Gunnlaugsson T. Colorimetric and fluorescent anion sensors: An overview of recent developments in the use of 1,8-naphthalimide-based chemosensors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:3936–3953. doi: 10.1039/b910560n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu Z., Yoon J., Spring D.R. Fluorescent chemosensors for Zn2+ Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:1996–2006. doi: 10.1039/b916287a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Evans N.H., Beer P.D. Advances in Anion Supramolecular Chemistry: From Recognition to Chemical Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:11716–11754. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaur A., Kolanowski J.L., New E.J. Reversible Fluorescent Probes for Biological Redox States. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:1602–1613. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li X., Gao X., Shi W., Ma H. Design Strategies for Water-Soluble Small Molecular Chromogenic and Fluorogenic Probes. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:590–659. doi: 10.1021/cr300508p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Alreja P., Kaur N. Recent advances in 1,10-phenanthroline ligands for chemosensing of cations and anions. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2016;6:23169–23217. doi: 10.1039/C6RA00150E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen X., Pradhan T., Wang F., Kim J.S., Yoon J. Fluorescent Chemosensors Based on Spiroring-Opening of Xanthenes and Related Derivatives. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:1910–1956. doi: 10.1021/cr200201z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ni Y., Wu J. Far-red and near infrared BODIPY dyes: Synthesis and applications for fluorescent pH probes and bio-imaging. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014;12:3774–3791. doi: 10.1039/c3ob42554a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Langton M.J., Beer P.D. Rotaxane and Catenane Host Structures for Sensing Charged Guest Species. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014;47:1935–1949. doi: 10.1021/ar500012a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Han C., Li H. Host-molecule-coated quantum dots as fluorescent sensors. Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 2010;397:1437–1444. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-3361-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhu L., Zhang L., Younes A.H. Mini review: Fluorescent heteroditopic ligands of metal ions. Supramol. Chem. 2009;21:268–283. doi: 10.1080/10610270802538298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ding Y., Tang Y., Zhu W., Xie Y. Fluorescent and colorimetric ion probes based on conjugated oligopyrroles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:1101–1112. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00436A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Callan J.F., de Silva A.P., Magri D.C. Luminescent sensors and switches in the early 21st century. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:8551–8588. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2005.05.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Eun Jun M., Roy B., Han Ahn K. “Turn-on” fluorescent sensing with “reactive” probes. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:7583–7601. doi: 10.1039/c1cc00014d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Formica M., Fusi V., Giorgi L., Micheloni M. New fluorescent chemosensors for metal ions in solution. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012;256:170–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schäferling M. The Art of Fluorescence Imaging with Chemical Sensors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:3532–3554. doi: 10.1002/anie.201105459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wu J., Liu W., Ge J., Zhang H., Wang P. New sensing mechanisms for design of fluorescent chemosensors emerging in recent years. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:3483–3495. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00224k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bissell R.A., de Silva A.P., Gunaratne H.Q.N., Lynch P.L.M., Maguire G.E.M., Sandanayake K.R.A.S. Molecular fluorescent signalling with ‘fluor-spacer-receptor’ systems: Approaches to sensing and switching devices via supramolecular photophysics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1992;21:187–195. doi: 10.1039/CS9922100187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.De Silva A.P., Gunaratne H.Q.N., Gunnlaugsson T., Huxley A.J.M., McCoy C.P., Rademacher J.T., Rice T.E. Signaling Recognition Events with Fluorescent Sensors and Switches. Chem. Rev. 1997;97:1515–1566. doi: 10.1021/cr960386p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Valeur B., Leray I. Design principles of fluorescent molecular sensors for cation recognition. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000;205:3–40. doi: 10.1016/S0010-8545(00)00246-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Grabowski Z.R., Dobkowski J. Twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) excited states: Energy and molecular structure. Pure Appl. Chem. 1983;55:245–252. doi: 10.1351/pac198855020245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Grabowski Z.R., Rotkiewicz K., Siemiarczuk A., Cowley D.J., Baumann W. Twisted intramolecular charge transfer states (TICT). A new class of excited states with a full charge separation. Nouv. J. Chim. 1979;3:443–454. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hush N.S., Reimers J.R. Solvent effects on metal to ligand charge transfer excitations. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998;177:37–60. doi: 10.1016/S0010-8545(98)00100-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yuan L., Lin W., Zheng K., Zhu S. FRET-Based Small-Molecule Fluorescent Probes: Rational Design and Bioimaging Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013;46:1462–1473. doi: 10.1021/ar300273v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sapsford K.E., Berti L., Medintz I.L. Materials for Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Analysis: Beyond Traditional Donor–Acceptor Combinations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006;45:4562–4589. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bencini A., Bianchi A., Lodeiro C., Masotti A., Parola A.J., Pina F., de Melo J.S., Valtancoli B. A novel fluorescent chemosensor exhibiting exciplex emission. An example of an elementary molecular machine driven by pH and by light. Chem. Commun. 2000:1639–1640. doi: 10.1039/b004506n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wu J.-S., Zhou J.-H., Wang P.-F., Zhang X.-H., Wu S.-K. New Fluorescent Chemosensor Based on Exciplex Signaling Mechanism. Org. Lett. 2005;7:2133–2136. doi: 10.1021/ol0504648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hong Y., Lam J.W.Y., Tang B.Z. Aggregation-induced emission: Phenomenon, mechanism and applications. Chem. Commun. 2009 doi: 10.1039/b904665h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Luo J., Xie Z., Lam J.W.Y., Cheng L., Chen H., Qiu C., Kwok H.S., Zhan X., Liu Y., Zhu D., et al. Aggregation-induced emission of 1-methyl-1,2,3,4,5-pentaphenylsilole. Chem. Commun. 2001:1740–1741. doi: 10.1039/b105159h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ding D., Li K., Liu B., Tang B.Z. Bioprobes Based on AIE Fluorogens. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013;46:2441–2453. doi: 10.1021/ar3003464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang H., Zhao E., Lam J.W.Y., Tang B.Z. AIE luminogens: Emission brightened by aggregation. Mater. Today. 2015;18:365–377. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hu R., Leung N.L.C., Tang B.Z. AIE macromolecules: Syntheses, structures and functionalities. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:4494–4562. doi: 10.1039/c4cs00044g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hancock R.D., McDougall G.J. The macrocyclic effect in tetraaza-macrocyclic ligands. Adv. Mol. Relax. Interact. Process. 1980;18:99–108. doi: 10.1016/0378-4487(80)80030-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bergamini G., Marchi E., Ceroni P. Metal ion complexes of cyclam-cored dendrimers for molecular photonics. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011;255:2458–2468. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Barefield E.K. Coordination chemistry of N-tetraalkylated cyclam ligands—A status report. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010;254:1607–1627. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Liang X., Sadler P.J. Cyclam complexes and their applications in medicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004;33:246–266. doi: 10.1039/b313659k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Anderson C.J., Ferdani R. Copper-64 Radiopharmaceuticals for PET Imaging of Cancer: Advances in Preclinical and Clinical Research. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2009;24:379–393. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2009.0674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jens G., Thomas W., Burkhard K. Transition Metal Complexes of Some Azamacrocycles and Their Use in Molecular Recognition. Curr. Org. Synth. 2007;4:390–412. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Santos-Figueroa L.E., de la Torre C., El Sayed S., Sancenón F., Martínez-Máñez R., Costero A.M., Gil S., Parra M. Highly Selective Fluorescence Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide by Using an Anthracene-Functionalized Cyclam–CuII Complex. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014;2014:41–45. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201301306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chen J., Li Y., Lv K., Zhong W., Wang H., Wu Z., Yi P., Jiang J. Cyclam-functionalized carbon dots sensor for sensitive and selective detection of copper(II) ion and sulfide anion in aqueous media and its imaging in live cells. Sens. Actuators B. 2016;224:298–306. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.10.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wrobel A.T., Johnstone T.C., Deliz Liang A., Lippard S.J., Rivera-Fuentes P. A Fast and Selective Near-Infrared Fluorescent Sensor for Multicolor Imaging of Biological Nitroxyl (HNO) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:4697–4705. doi: 10.1021/ja500315x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Loas A., Radford R.J., Deliz Liang A., Lippard S.J. Solid-phase synthesis provides a modular, lysine-based platform for fluorescent discrimination of nitroxyl and biological thiols. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:4131–4140. doi: 10.1039/C5SC00880H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhang P., Chen J., Huang F., Zeng Z., Hu J., Yi P., Zeng F., Wu S. One-pot fabrication of polymer nanoparticle-based chemosensors for Cu2+ detection in aqueous media. Polym. Chem. 2013;4:2325–2332. doi: 10.1039/c3py21131b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tamanini E., Katewa A., Sedger L.M., Todd M.H., Watkinson M. A Synthetically Simple, Click-Generated Cyclam-Based Zinc(II) Sensor. Inorg. Chem. 2009;48:319–324. doi: 10.1021/ic8017634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tamanini E., Flavin K., Motevalli M., Piperno S., Gheber L.A., Todd M.H., Watkinson M. Cyclam-Based “Clickates”: Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Fluorescent Sensors for Zn(II) Inorg. Chem. 2010;49:3789–3800. doi: 10.1021/ic901939x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lau Y.H., Price J.R., Todd M.H., Rutledge P.J. A Click Fluorophore Sensor that Can Distinguish CuII and HgII via Selective Anion-Induced Demetallation. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:2850–2858. doi: 10.1002/chem.201002477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ast S., Rutledge P.J., Todd M.H. Reversing the Triazole Topology in a Cyclam-Triazole-Dye Ligand Gives a 10-Fold Brighter Signal Response to Zn2+ in Aqueous Solution. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012;2012:5611–5615. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201201072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ast S., Kuke S., Rutledge P.J., Todd M.H. Using Click Chemistry to Tune the Properties and the Fluorescence Response Mechanism of Structurally Similar Probes for Metal Ions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015;2015:58–66. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201402811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wong J.K.-H., Ast S., Yu M., Flehr R., Counsell A.J., Turner P., Crisologo P., Todd M.H., Rutledge P.J. Synthesis and evaluation of 1,8-disubstituted-cyclam/naphthalimide conjugates as probes for metal ions. Chem. Open. 2016 doi: 10.1002/open.201600010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yu M., Ast S., Yu Q., Lo A.T.S., Flehr R., Todd M.H., Rutledge P.J. Incorporating a Piperidinyl Group in the Fluorophore Extends the Fluorescence Lifetime of Click-Derived Cyclam-Naphthalimide Conjugates. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Yu M., Wong J.K.-H., Tang C., Turner P., Todd M.H., Rutledge P.J. Efficient deprotection of F-BODIPY derivatives: Removal of BF2 using Brønsted acids. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015;11:37–41. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.11.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yu M., Yu Q., Rutledge P.J., Todd M.H. A Fluorescent “Allosteric Scorpionand” Complex Visualizes a Biological Recognition Event. ChemBioChem. 2013;14:224–229. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201200637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Green N.M. A spectrophotometric assay for avidin and biotin based on binding of dyes by avidin. Biochem. J. 1965;94:23C–24C. doi: 10.1042/bj0940023C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Gutsche C.D., Dhawan B., Levine J.A., Hyun No K., Bauer L.J. Calixarenes 9: Conformational isomers of the ethers and esters of calix[4]arenes. Tetrahedron. 1983;39:409–426. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)88541-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ma J., Song M., Boussouar I., Tian D., Li H. Recent progress of calixarene-based fluorescent chemosensors towards mercury ions. Supramol. Chem. 2015;27:444–452. doi: 10.1080/10610278.2014.988627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Song M., Sun Z., Han C., Tian D., Li H., Kim J.S. Calixarene-Based Chemosensors by Means of Click Chemistry. Chem. Asian J. 2014;9:2344–2357. doi: 10.1002/asia.201400024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kim J.S., Quang D.T. Calixarene-Derived Fluorescent Probes. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:3780–3799. doi: 10.1021/cr068046j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Erdemir S., Tabakci B., Tabakci M. A highly selective fluorescent sensor based on calix[4]arene appended benzothiazole units for Cu2+, S2− and HSO4− ions in aqueous solution. Sens. Actuators B. 2016;228:109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.01.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Erdemir S., Kocyigit O., Karakurt S. A new perylene bisimide-armed calix[4]-aza-crown as “turn on” fluorescent sensor for Hg2+ ion and its application to living cells. Sens. Actuators B. 2015;220:381–388. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.05.103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zhang S., Yang H., Ma Y., Fang Y. A fluorescent bis-NBD derivative of calix[4]arene: Switchable response to Ag+ and HCHO in solution phase. Sens. Actuators B. 2016;227:271–276. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zhan J., Fang F., Tian D., Li H. Anthraquinone-modified calix[4]arene: Click synthesis, selective calcium ion fluorescent chemosensor and INHIBIT logic gate. Supramol. Chem. 2012;24:272–278. doi: 10.1080/10610278.2012.656124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Mummidivarapu V.V.S., Hinge V.K., Tabbasum K., Gonnade R.G., Rao C.P. Triazole-Linked Anthracenyl-Appended Calix[4]arene Conjugate As Receptor for Co(II): Synthesis, Spectroscopy, Microscopy, and Computational Studies. J. Org. Chem. 2013;78:3570–3576. doi: 10.1021/jo400038x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Pathak R.K., Hinge V.K., Mondal P., Rao C.P. Ratiometric fluorescence off-on-off sensor for Cu2+ in aqueous buffer by a lower rim triazole linked benzimidazole conjugate of calix[4]arene. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:10652–10660. doi: 10.1039/c2dt30432e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Maity D., Vyas G., Bhatt M., Paul P. Detection of NaCN in aqueous media using a calixarene-based fluoroionophore containing ruthenium(II)-bipyridine as the fluorogenic unit. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2015;5:6151–6159. doi: 10.1039/C4RA12075B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.D’Urso A., Brancatelli G., Hickey N., Farnetti E., De Zorzi R., Bonaccorso C., Purrello R., Geremia S. Interactions of a water-soluble calix[4]arene with spermine: Solution and solid-state characterisation. Supramol. Chem. 2016;28:499–505. doi: 10.1080/10610278.2015.1125900. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Carrillo-Carrión C., Lendl B., Simonet B.M., Valcárcel M. Calix[8]arene Coated CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots as C60-Nanosensor. Anal. Chem. 2011;83:8093–8100. doi: 10.1021/ac201134d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Szejtli J. Introduction and General Overview of Cyclodextrin Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 1998;98:1743–1754. doi: 10.1021/cr970022c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ogoshi T., Harada A. Chemical Sensors Based on Cyclodextrin Derivatives. Sensors. 2008;8:4961. doi: 10.3390/s8084961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Saenger W. Cyclodextrin Inclusion Compounds in Research and Industry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1980;19:344–362. doi: 10.1002/anie.198003441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Khan R.I., Pitchumani K. B-Cyclodextrin included coumarin derivatives as selective fluorescent sensors for Cu2+ ions in HeLa cells. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2016;6:20269–20275. doi: 10.1039/C6RA01522K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zhang L., Hu W., Yu L., Wang Y. Click synthesis of a novel triazole bridged AIE active cyclodextrin probe for specific detection of Cd2+ Chem. Commun. 2015;51:4298–4301. doi: 10.1039/C4CC09769F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Liu Z., Yang W., Li Y., Tian F., Zhu W. A facile synthesis of a highly water-soluble and selective fluorescent sensor towards zinc ions derived from b-cyclodextrin based on an unexpected sensing process. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2015;5:100482–100487. doi: 10.1039/C5RA21038K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zhang Y.-H., Zhang Y.-M., Chen Y., Yang Y., Liu Y. Phenanthroline bridged bis(b-cyclodextrin)s/adamantane-carboxylic acid supramolecular complex as an efficient fluorescence sensor to Zn2+ Org. Chem. Front. 2014;1:355–360. doi: 10.1039/c3qo00054k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zhang L., He Y., Zhang N., Liu D., Han J., Gong W. Construction of a novel INHIBIT logic gate through a fine-tuned assembly of anthryl fluorophores via selective anion recognition and host-guest interactions. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2016;6:805–809. doi: 10.1039/C5RA20120A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Antony E.J., Raj M., Paulpandi R.Q., Paulraj M.S., Enoch I.V.M.V. A Highly Selective Fluorescent Sensor for Pb2+ Based on a Modified β-Cyclodextrin. J. Fluoresc. 2015;25:1031–1036. doi: 10.1007/s10895-015-1588-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kanagaraj K., Bavanidevi K., Chow T.J., Pitchumani K. Selective “turn-off” fluorescent sensing of mercury ions using aminocyclodextrin:3-hydroxy-N-phenyl-2-naphthamide complex in aqueous solution. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2014;4:11714–11722. doi: 10.1039/c3ra45837g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Feng L., Tong C., He Y., Liu B., Wang C., Sha J., Lü C. A novel FRET-based fluorescent chemosensor of β-cyclodextrin derivative for TNT detection in aqueous solution. J. Lumin. 2014;146:502–507. doi: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.10.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Pedersen C.J. Cyclic polyethers and their complexes with metal salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967;89:2495–2496. doi: 10.1021/ja00986a052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Gokel G.W., Leevy W.M., Weber M.E. Crown Ethers: Sensors for Ions and Molecular Scaffolds for Materials and Biological Models. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:2723–2750. doi: 10.1021/cr020080k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Diao Q., Ma P., Lv L., Li T., Wang X., Song D. A novel fluorescent probe for Cr3+ based on rhodamine–crown ether conjugate and its application to drinking water examination and bioimaging. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2016;156:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Zhang Z., Wang H., Zhang H., Liu Y. Selectively Fluorescent Sensing Behavior of Phenylaza-15-crown-5-triazolyl Coumarin for Hg2+ and Fe3+ in Alcohol and Aqueous Media Respectively. Chin. J. Chem. 2013;31:598–602. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201300216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Chen Y., Wang X., Wang K., Zhang X. A benzo-15-crown-5-modifying ratiometric-absorption and fluorescent OFF–ON chemosensor for Cu2+ Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2016;161:144–149. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2016.02.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wang X., Hu J., Liu T., Zhang G., Liu S. Highly sensitive and selective fluorometric off–on K+ probe constructed via host-guest molecular recognition and aggregation-induced emission. J. Mater. Chem. 2012;22:8622–8628. doi: 10.1039/c2jm16510d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Depauw A., Kumar N., Ha-Thi M.-H., Leray I. Calixarene-Based Fluorescent Sensors for Cesium Cations Containing BODIPY Fluorophore. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2015;119:6065–6073. doi: 10.1021/jp5120288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Yang S.-T., Liao D.-J., Chen S.-J., Hu C.-H., Wu A.-T. A fluorescence enhancement-based sensor for hydrogen sulfate ion. Analyst. 2012;137:1553–1555. doi: 10.1039/c2an16315b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Hua Y., Flood A.H. Click chemistry generates privileged CH hydrogen-bonding triazoles: The latest addition to anion supramolecular chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:1262–1271. doi: 10.1039/b818033b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Liu Q.-X., Chen J.-R., Sun X.-F., Zhao X.-J., Zhao Z.-X., Cai K.-Q. An NHC silver(I) macrometallocycle: Synthesis, structure and selective recognition of iodide anions. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2016;6:12256–12262. doi: 10.1039/C5RA23814E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Yu Y., Bogliotti N., Tang J., Xie J. Synthesis and Properties of Carbohydrate-Based BODIPY-Functionalised Fluorescent Macrocycles. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013;2013:7749–7760. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201300953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wang J.-H., Xiong J.-B., Zhang X., Song S., Zhu Z.-H., Zheng Y.-S. Tetraphenylethylene imidazolium macrocycle: Synthesis and selective fluorescence turn-on sensing of pyrophosphate anions. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2015;5:60096–60100. doi: 10.1039/C5RA09721E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Mesquita L.M., André V., Esteves C.V., Palmeira T., Berberan-Santos M.N., Mateus P., Delgado R. Dinuclear Zinc(II) Macrocyclic Complex as Receptor for Selective Fluorescence Sensing of Pyrophosphate. Inorg. Chem. 2016;55:2212–2219. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Bakthavatsalam S., Sarkar A., Rakshit A., Jain S., Kumar A., Datta A. Tuning macrocycles to design ‘turn-on’ fluorescence probes for manganese(II) sensing in live cells. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:2605–2608. doi: 10.1039/C4CC09542A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Zhang K., Wu S., Qu D., Wang L. ESIPT-based ratiometric probe for Zn2+ detection based on BINOL framework. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016;57:1133–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.01.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Adachi N., Sugiyama H., Arai M., Ogawa H. Turn-on Type Chemical Sensing of Vitamin K4 by Fluorene Dendrimers with Naphthalene Segments. Molecules. 2014;19:4135. doi: 10.3390/molecules19044135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Li J., Wei W., Qi X., Zuo G., Fang J., Dong W. Highly selective colorimetric/fluorometric dual-channel sensor for cyanide based on ICT off in aqueous solution. Sens. Actuators B. 2016;228:330–334. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.01.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Wang L., Li L., Cao D. Dual binding site assisted chromogenic and fluorogenic discrimination of fluoride and cyanide by boryl functionalized BODIPY. Sens. Actuators B. 2016;228:347–359. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.01.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Ast S., Rutledge P.J., Todd M.H. pH-Responsive quantum dots (RQDs) that combine a fluorescent nanoparticle with a pH-sensitive dye. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16:25255–25257. doi: 10.1039/C4CP03914A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Ast S., Rutledge P.J., Todd M.H. The properties and performance of a pH-responsive functionalised nanoparticle. Faraday Discuss. 2014;175:171–187. doi: 10.1039/C4FD00110A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Pansare V.J., Hejazi S., Faenza W.J., Prud’homme R.K. Review of Long-Wavelength Optical and NIR Imaging Materials: Contrast Agents, Fluorophores, and Multifunctional Nano Carriers. Chem. Mater. 2012;24:812–827. doi: 10.1021/cm2028367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Weissleder R., Kelly K., Sun E.Y., Shtatland T., Josephson L. Cell-specific targeting of nanoparticles by multivalent attachment of small molecules. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005;23:1418–1423. doi: 10.1038/nbt1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Zorov D.B., Kobrinsky E., Juhaszova M., Sollott S.J. Examining Intracellular Organelle Function Using Fluorescent Probes. Circ. Res. 2004;95:239–252. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000137875.42385.8e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Smith D.G., Sajid N., Rehn S., Chandramohan R., Carney I.J., Khan M.A., New E.J. A library-screening approach for developing a fluorescence sensing array for the detection of metal ions. Analyst. 2016;141:4608–4613. doi: 10.1039/C6AN00510A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Chhatwal M., Kumar A., Singh V., Gupta R.D., Awasthi S.K. Addressing of multiple-metal ions on a single platform. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015;292:30–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hossain A., Canning J., Ast S., Rutledge P.J., Yen T.L., Jamalipour A. Lab-in-a-Phone: Smartphone-Based Portable Fluorometer for pH Measurements of Environmental Water. IEEE Sens. J. 2015;15:5095–5102. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2014.2361651. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Hossain M.A., Canning J., Ast S., Cook K., Rutledge P.J., Jamalipour A. Combined “dual” absorption and fluorescence smartphone spectrometers. Opt. Lett. 2015;40:1737–1740. doi: 10.1364/OL.40.001737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Hossain M.A., Canning J., Ast S., Rutledge P.J., Jamalipour A. Early warning smartphone diagnostics for water security and analysis using real-time pH mapping. Photonic Sens. 2015;5:289–297. doi: 10.1007/s13320-015-0256-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]