Abstract
Background.
Rett syndrome (RTT) is caused by mutations in methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2), but defects in a handful of other genes (e.g., CDKL5, FOXG1, MEF2C) can lead to presentations that resemble, but do not completely mirror, classical RTT. In this study, we attempted to identify other monogenic disorders that share features with RTT.
Methods.
We performed a retrospective chart review on n=319 patients who had undergone clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) for further etiological evaluation of neurodevelopmental diagnoses that remained unexplained despite extensive prior workup. From this group, we characterized those who (1) possessed features that were compatible with RTT based on clinical judgment (2) subsequently underwent MECP2 sequencing and/or MECP2 deletion/duplication analysis with negative results (3) ultimately arrived at a diagnosis other than RTT with WES.
Results.
n=7 patients had clinical features overlapping RTT with negative MECP2 analysis but positive WES providing a diagnosis. These 7 patients collectively possessed pathogenic variants in 6 different genes: two in KCNB1 and one each in FOXG1, IQSEC2, MEIS2, TCF4, and WDR45. n=2 (both with KCNB1 variants) fulfilled criteria for atypical RTT. RTT associated features included the following: loss of hand or language skills (n=3; IQSEC2, KCNB1 × 2); disrupted sleep (n=4; KNCB1, MEIS2, TCF4, WDR45); stereotyped hand movements (n=5; FOXG1, KNCB1 × 2, MEIS2, TCF4); bruxism (n=3; KCNB1 × 2; TCF4); and hypotonia (n=7).
Conclusion.
Clinically-based diagnoses can be misleading, evident by the increasing number of genetic conditions associated with features of RTT with negative MECP2 mutations.
Keywords: Rett syndrome, Mendelian disorders, mimics
INTRODUCTION
Rett syndrome (RTT) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a wide range of neurological impairments. Affected patients often present with acquired microcephaly, epilepsy, regression in language and hand use, motor stereotypies, and apraxic gait [1]. Other features include intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), anxiety, Parkinsonism, sleep disturbance, respiratory abnormalities, gastrointestinal issues, scoliosis, and autonomic dysfunction [2].
The first descriptions of RTT were clinical and delineated classic and atypical/variant forms of the disease. In 2010, a panel convened and revised these descriptions, establishing a unified set of diagnostic standards based on the presence or absence of certain main, exclusion, and supportive criteria. According to these consensus guidelines, both classic and atypical forms of the disease must involve regression followed by a period of recovery/stability. While classic RTT has to fulfill all of the main criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, atypical RTT needs to satisfy at least two out of four main criteria as well as five out of 11 supportive criteria [3].
Despite uniformity established by clinical criteria, a number of genes are implicated in the presentations of classic or atypical RTT. The most common cause of classic RTT is a de novo mutation in the X-linked gene MECP2 (methyl-CpG-binding protein 2) [4]. MECP2 encodes a transcription factor implicated in a number of regulatory processes in the brain important for neuronal development and growth [5]. Over time, researchers have identified other causes of RTT besides MECP2 mutations, including defects in CDKL5 (cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5), FOXG1 (forkhead box protein G1), and MEF2C (myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2C) [6].
The advent of next-generation sequencing has ushered in the discovery of other causes of Rett-like presentations in patients without MECP2 defects [6]. In one study that evaluated 21 females with features of RTT, two-thirds of the patients had pathogenic variants in genes other than MECP2, CDKL5, and FOXG1 [7]. In another study of 19 patients with features of RTT, two had pathogenic genomic imbalances, six had variants in genes already associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, and five had variants in candidate disease genes [8].
In this study, our goal was to continue to expand the genetic landscape of Mendelian disorders that share features with RTT. To this end, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients in the Kennedy Krieger Institute Neurogenetics Clinic whose features of RTT prompted MECP2 sequencing followed by whole-exome sequencing (WES) when MECP2 sequencing was non-diagnostic. We characterized the clinical and molecular findings of these patients with features of RTT but a genetic diagnosis other than an MECP2 defect.
METHODS
Overview
We performed a retrospective chart review on n = 319 patients who had clinical WES for etiological evaluation of neurodevelopmental diagnoses that remained unexplained despite extensive prior workup. These disorders included intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy-like motor encephalopathy, and epilepsy. We characterized those who (1) possessed features consistent with RTT based on clinician judgment (2) subsequently underwent MECP2 sequencing with or without deletion/duplication analysis which was negative (3) ultimately arrived at a diagnosis other than RTT with WES.
Specifically, we identified every patient at our institution who underwent clinical WES for explained neurodevelopmental diagnoses, between the years 2012 and 2015, based on our internal tracking of this data. For each patient who had undergone WES, with a result that was deemed to be causative of the patient’s presentation (i.e., possessing a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a gene that would explain the patient’s phenotype), we evaluated all clinical documentation (clinic notes as well as biochemical, molecular, and cytogenetic testing) related to etiological evaluation. We then selected out those individuals who not only had a positive result on WES but who, prior to WES, had undergone MECP2 sequencing (with or without deletion/duplication analysis) which was negative. We further reviewed clinical notes to determine the rationale of the clinician in sending MECP2 sequencing. We have summarized the constellation of clinical features for each patient that led to MECP2 sequencing (see Table 3).
Table 3.
Patient | Features |
---|---|
1 | Male, ID, intractable epilepsy, stereotyped hand movements, loss of purposeful hand use, hypotonia |
2 | Female, ID, epilepsy, microcephaly, hypotonia, spasticity |
3 | Male, ID, epilepsy, postnatal microcephaly, hand-wringing |
4 | Female, ID, intractable epilepsy, hand wringing, bruxism |
5 | Female, ID, autism, epilepsy, hypotonia. |
6 | Male, ID, autism, hyperventilation, bruxism, hand to mouth stereotypies, hand wringing |
7 | Female, ID, language regression, hypotonia |
The Institution Review Board of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine approved this study under an IRB exemption protocol (IRB00098913).
Whole Exome Sequencing
Each patient had clinical WES performed through Ambry Genetics Laboratory (Aliso Viejo, California) or GeneDx Laboratory (Gaithersburg, Maryland). We obtained samples from the patient, parents, and any affected siblings, if applicable/available. Each laboratory performed exome sequencing and data analysis using its own bioinformatics pipeline and confirmed results with Sanger sequencing. Full details are available in a prior report [9].
RESULTS
Molecular findings
There were 7 patients with clinical features overlapping RTT who had negative MECP2 sequencing but diagnostic findings on WES (Table 1). These 7 patients collectively possessed pathogenic variants in 6 different genes. Two individuals had pathogenic variants in KCNB1; the remaining 5 individuals possessed pathogenic variants in the following genes: FOXG1, IQSEC2, MEIS2, TCF4, and WDR45.
Table 1.
Patient 1 (Male) |
Patient 2 (Female) |
Patient 3 (Male) |
Patient 4 (Female) |
Patient 5 (Female) |
Patient 6 (Male) |
Patient 7 (Female) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene | KCNB1 | WDR45 | FOXG1 | KCNB1 | MEIS2 | TCF4 | IQSEC2 |
cDNA change | c.1135G>A | c.551delC | c.460dupG | c.1121C>T | c.955A>G | c.759C>G | c.2983C>T |
Protein change | p.G379R | p.S184LfsX13 | p.E154GfsX301 | p.T374I | p.R319G | p.S253R | p.R995W |
Zygosity | Heterozygous | Heterozygous | Heterozygous | Heterozygous | Heterozygous | Heterozygous | Heterozygous |
Inheritance | De novo | De Novo | Presumed germline mosaicisma | De novo | De novo | De novo | De novo |
Disease inheritance pattern | Autosomal dominant | X-linked | Autosomal dominant | Autosomal dominant | Autosomal dominant | Autosomal dominant | X-linked |
a Patient has a sister with a similar phenotype who possesses the same variant
Clinical findings
Of the 7 patients, two (Patients 1 and 4) who met diagnostic criteria for atypical RTT, and both had KCNB1 variants (Table 2). These two patients presented with regression affecting language or hand use, stereotyped hand movements, bruxism, intense eye communication, and abnormal muscle tone.
Table 2.
Feature | Patient Number |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Affected Gene |
KCNB1 | WDR45 | FOXG1 | KCNB1 | MEIS2 | TCF4 | IQSEC2 | |
RTT Clinical Criteria | ||||||||
Classification | Atypical RTT |
Some RTT features |
Some RTT features |
Atypical RTT |
Some RTT features |
Some RTT features |
Some RTT features |
|
Number of major criteria | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Number of supportive criteria | 5 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 1 | |
Growth | ||||||||
>Growth retardation | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | |
Microcephaly | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | |
Cognitive | ||||||||
*Loss of acquired purposeful hand skills | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
*Loss of acquired spoken language | − | − | − | + | − | − | + | |
Intellectual disability | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
Seizures/Sleep | ||||||||
Seizures | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | |
>Impaired sleep pattern | − | + | − | + | + | + | − | |
Behavioral | ||||||||
*Stereotyped hand movements | + | − | + | + | + | + | − | |
Autism diagnosis | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | |
>Bruxism when awake | + | − | − | + | − | + | − | |
>Inappropriate laughing/screaming spells | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | |
>Breathing disturbances when awake | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | |
>Intense eye communication | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | |
Motor/Sensory | ||||||||
>Abnormal muscle tone | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
>Diminished response to pain | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | |
*Dyspraxic or absent gait | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | |
Autonomic | ||||||||
>Peripheral vasomotor disturbances | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | |
>Small cold hands/feet | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | |
GI | ||||||||
Constipation | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | |
Skeletal | ||||||||
>Scoliosis/kyphosis | − | − | + | − | − | − | − |
With respect to major RTT criteria, stereotyped hand movements were present in 5/7 patients (FOXG1, KCNB1 × 2, MEIS2, TCF4), and dyspraxic/absent gait was present in 3/7 patients (FOXG1, KCNB1, WDR45). With respect to minor RTT criteria, the four most common features were: abnormal muscle tone (7/7 patients), impaired sleep pattern (4/7 patients; KCNB1, MEIS2, TCF4, WDR45), bruxism while awake (3/7 patients; KCNB1 × 2, TCF4), and intense eye communication (3/7 patients; KCNB1 × 2, MEIS2).
DISCUSSION
In this report, we presented seven patients with clinical features of RTT, whose MECP2 testing was negative and who were eventually diagnosis by WES. Two of the patients met diagnostic criteria for atypical RTT, and all but one of the patients had four or more major or minor diagnostic features.
Our work adds to the growing body of literature implicating a number of different genes in RTT-like presentations, especially with the advance of next-generation sequencing. In one study of 21 girls with features of RTT, WES was able to identify pathogenic variants in different genes in two-thirds of the cohort. Some of these variants affected genes previously associated with neurodevelopmental phenotypes, such as HCN1, SCN1A, TCF4, GRIN2B, SLC6A1, while others were in candidate genes not previously associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as SEMA6B [7]. In another study of 22 patients with RTT, who had prior negative clinical testing for mutations in MECP2, CDKL5, and FOXG1, WES revealed likely pathogenic variants in the majority of cases, including in IQSEC2, TCF4, and WDR45 [10], three of the genes identified in our cohort. In addition to these cohort studies, there have been numerous WES-based case reports implicating a variety of genes in RTT-like phenotypes, such as SATB2 [11], ST3GAL5 [12], and TBL1XR1 [13].
Collectively, the molecular abnormalities in our cohort were present in genes with differing roles. These genes encode transcription factors (FOXG1, MEIS2, TCF4), nucleotide exchange factors (IQSEC2), ion channel subunits (KCNB1), and scaffolding proteins (WDR45). The diverse functioning of these genes underscores the point that different gene defects can converge onto final common pathways, leading to similar clinical phenotypes.
FOXG1
FOXG1 (forkhead box G1) belongs to a family of transcription factors containing a DNA binding domain known as the forkhead box [14]. In humans, FOXG1 mutations are associated with structural brain defects and severe neurological abnormalities. Affected patients have evidence of microcephaly, cerebral atrophy, gyral simplification, hypomyelination, and a thin corpus callosum [15]. Clinical features include severe ID with poor language development, epilepsy, autistic features, and mixed movement disorders [16].Many of these clinical characteristics are also seen in RTT. In fact, researchers identified pathogenic FOXG1 variants in patients with early onset (atypical) RTT [17] and these variants have been increasingly identified in patients with RTT [18]. Correspondingly, patient 3 in our cohort with a FOXG1 mutation presented with postnatal microcephaly, profound ID, tonic-clonic seizures, choreoathetoid movements, hand-wringing, and scoliosis, prompting search for an MECP2 mutation.
IQSEC2
There are multiple reports of patients with variants in IQSEC2 (IQ motif And Sec7 domain 2), encoding a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the ADP ribosylation factor (ARF) family, that present with clinical features of RTT. One such report describes a female with delayed myelination, developmental regression not affecting hand use, and hand stereotypies. She had a likely pathogenic de novo IQSEC2 frameshift deletion (c.273_282del; p.Asn91Lysfs*112). Though she did not fulfill requirements for a clinical diagnosis of typical or atypical RTT, she met 3/4 of the main criteria and 3/11 of the supportive criteria [19]. Another report mentions an IQSEC2 nonsense mutation in a female with severe ID, developmental regression with loss of acquired language, stereotyped hand movements, and inappropriate laughing/screaming spells [20]. Patient 7 in our cohort has a relatively non-specific profile characterized by global developmental delay and hypotonia. However, consistent with other presentations of IQSEC2 related disorders as noted above, she did experience language regression, which was one of the features that prompted MECP2 sequencing.
KCNB1
Mutations in KCNB1 (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily B member 1) result in a presentation of epileptic encephalopathy characterized by multiple seizure types, ID, motor delay, and hypotonia [21]. Developmental regression can occur in early childhood [21, 22]. In some cases, patients demonstrate behavioral abnormalities, like autistic features [23], stereotyped hand-wringing [24], hyperactivity, irritability, agitation, and aggression [25]. There are no previous reports linking KCNB1 variants to a RTT-like presentation. Both patients in our cohort with KCBN1 mutations (Patients 1 and 4) fulfilled criteria for atypical RTT. Common RTT-like features shared between them included stereotyped hand movements, bruxism when awake, intense eye communication, and abnormal muscle tone. Their presentations should raise awareness of the possibility of KCNB1 defects as an additional cause of atypical RTT.
MEIS2
Patient 5 in our cohort has a MEIS2 (Meis homeobox 2) and several clinical features consistent with MEIS2 related disorders. Specifically, her presentation is notable for ID, ASD, minor dysmorphisms, atrial septal defect, VSD, and bifid uvula, which are features seen in MEIS2 disruptions [26–28]. Some of her RTT-like features, including stereotyped hand movements and impaired sleep pattern, could be explained by the diagnosis of ASD. Moreover, the presence of abnormal muscle tone, which is one of the supportive criteria for atypical RTT, is relatively non-specific, and is seen in a multitude of neurodevelopmental disorders.
TCF4
Haploinsufficiency of TCF4 (transcription factor 4) results in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome (PHS) [29]. PHS is characterized by ID, epilepsy, microcephaly, facial dysmorphisms, postnatal growth restriction, and intermittent hyperventilation. Episodic hyperventilation/apnea, microcephaly, and ASD-related stereotyped hand movements [30] may steer clinicians toward a diagnosis of RTT rather than PHS. In fact, patient 6 in our cohort with a TCF4 mutation exhibited severe ID, ASD, and facial dysmorphisms. The presence of distinct facial features is more consistent with PHS and helps to distinguish PHS from RTT.
WDR45
WDR45 (WD repeat domain 45) mutations result in a syndrome called beta-propeller protein-associated neurodegeneration (BPAN) characterized by a spectrum of neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Global developmental delay is prominent in infancy or childhood and transforms into moderate-severe ID. Various seizure types can occur. Neurodegeneration starts during adolescence or early adulthood with the emergence of cognitive deterioration and motor abnormalities, such as dystonia, bradykinesia, and rigidity. Other characteristics of the disorder include sleep difficulties and hand stereotypies [31]. Affected patients may have features overlapping those of RTT, including developmental regression, hand-wringing, and seizures. Some may even have a diagnosis of typical or atypical RTT [31–33]. Patient 2 in our cohort (with a WDR45 mutation) presented with epilepsy, ID, microcephaly, truncal hypotonia, appendicular spasticity, and gastrointestinal problems. The presence of microcephaly in conjunction with her other features led to MECP2 sequencing.
Moving Towards Molecular Definitions of Disease
It may be reasonable to move away from clinical definitions of genetic disorders toward molecular or biological definitions of disorders, especially for RTT [34]. Certainly, there are benefits of defining patients by clinical descriptions, such as grouping patients with similar features for the purpose of clinical management. However, such an approach does not fare well when it comes to clinical trials for therapeutics that target disease mechanisms centered around the core genetic defect. For example, a treatment which targets neuronal maturational defects seen in MECP2 mutations may not be effective for an ion channelopathy due to KCNB1 alterations. Furthermore, careful neurological and behavioral phenotyping may reveal overt and subtle distinctions that confer specificities to each genetic disorder associated with RTT.
Limitations
Our work has some limitations. Notably, the patients were part of this case series because prior to pursuing WES, a clinician sent testing for MECP2 due to some suspicion for RTT, and not necessarily because the patient fulfilled diagnostic criteria for RTT. However, this approach mirrors the practice of neurologists and geneticists, and acknowledges that clinical criteria exist with certain amount of leeway.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank the families for their participation. Dr. Srivastava is supported by an NIH grant, 4T32GM007748–38.
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
JC is paid consultant for Invitae, and AF is a paid consultant for Ambry Genetics and Aevi Genomic Medicine.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hagberg B, Aicardi J, Dias K, Ramos O. A progressive syndrome of autism, dementia, ataxia, and loss of purposeful hand use in girls: Rett’s syndrome: report of 35 cases. Ann Neurol 1983;14:471–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Christodoulou J, Ho G. MECP2-Related Disorders In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, Bean LJ, Bird TD, Fong C-T, Mefford HC, Smith RJ, Stephens K, eds. GeneReviews(®). Seattle (WA): : University of Washington, Seattle; 1993. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1497/ (accessed 23 Mar2016). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neul JL, Kaufmann WE, Glaze DG, Christodoulou J, Clarke AJ, Bahi-Buisson N, Leonard H, Bailey MES, Schanen NC, Zappella M, Renieri A, Huppke P, Percy AK, RettSearch Consortium. Rett syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature. Ann Neurol 2010;68:944–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Neul JL, Fang P, Barrish J, Lane J, Caeg EB, Smith EO, Zoghbi H, Percy A, Glaze DG. Specific mutations in methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 confer different severity in Rett syndrome. Neurology 2008;70:1313–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nguyen MVC, Du F, Felice CA, Shan X, Nigam A, Mandel G, Robinson JK, Ballas N. MeCP2 Is Critical for Maintaining Mature Neuronal Networks and Global Brain Anatomy during Late Stages of Postnatal Brain Development and in the Mature Adult Brain. J Neurosci 2012;32:10021–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gold WA, Christodoulou J. The Utility of Next-Generation Sequencing in Gene Discovery for Mutation-Negative Patients with Rett Syndrome. Front Cell Neurosci 2015;9. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lucariello M, Vidal E, Vidal S, Saez M, Roa L, Huertas D, Pineda M, Dalfó E, Dopazo J, Jurado P, Armstrong J, Esteller M. Whole exome sequencing of Rett syndrome-like patients reveals the mutational diversity of the clinical phenotype. Hum Genet 2016;135:1343–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lopes F, Barbosa M, Ameur A, Soares G, de Sá J, Dias AI, Oliveira G, Cabral P, Temudo T, Calado E, Cruz IF, Vieira JP, Oliveira R, Esteves S, Sauer S, Jonasson I, Syvänen A-C, Gyllensten U, Pinto D, Maciel P. Identification of novel genetic causes of Rett syndrome-like phenotypes. J Med Genet Published Online First: 6 January 2016. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Srivastava S, Cohen JS, Vernon H, Barañano K, McClellan R, Jamal L, Naidu S, Fatemi A. Clinical whole exome sequencing in child neurology practice. Ann Neurol 2014;76:473–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sajan SA, Jhangiani SN, Muzny DM, Gibbs RA, Lupski JR, Glaze DG, Kaufmann WE, Skinner SA, Anese F, Friez MJ, Jane L, Percy AK, Neul JL. Enrichment of mutations in chromatin regulators in people with Rett Syndrome lacking mutations in MECP2. Genet Med 2017;19:13–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lee JS, Yoo Y, Lim BC, Kim KJ, Choi M, Chae J-H. SATB2-associated syndrome presenting with Rett-like phenotypes. Clin Genet 2016;89:728–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee JS, Yoo Y, Lim BC, Kim KJ, Song J, Choi M, Chae J-H. GM3 synthase deficiency due to ST3GAL5 variants in two Korean female siblings: Masquerading as Rett syndrome-like phenotype. Am J Med Genet A 2016;170:2200–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Saitsu H, Tohyama J, Walsh T, Kato M, Kobayashi Y, Lee M, Tsurusaki Y, Miyake N, Goto Y-I, Nishino I, Ohtake A, King M-C, Matsumoto N. A girl with West syndrome and autistic features harboring a de novo TBL1XR1 mutation. J Hum Genet 2014;59:581–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lehmann OJ, Sowden JC, Carlsson P, Jordan T, Bhattacharya SS. Fox’s in development and disease. Trends Genet 2003;19:339–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Florian C, Bahi-Buisson N, Bienvenu T. FOXG1-Related Disorders: From Clinical Description to Molecular Genetics. Mol Syndromol 2012;2:153–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kortüm F, Das S, Flindt M, Morris-Rosendahl DJ, Stefanova I, Goldstein A, Horn D, Klopocki E, Kluger G, Martin P, Rauch A, Roumer A, Saitta S, Walsh LE, Wieczorek D, Uyanik G, Kutsche K, Dobyns WB. The core FOXG1 syndrome phenotype consists of postnatal microcephaly, severe mental retardation, absent language, dyskinesia, and corpus callosum hypogenesis. J Med Genet 2011;48:396–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ariani F, Hayek G, Rondinella D, Artuso R, Mencarelli MA, Spanhol-Rosseto A, Pollazzon M, Buoni S, Spiga O, Ricciardi S, Meloni I, Longo I, Mari F, Broccoli V, Zappella M, Renieri A. FOXG1 is responsible for the congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2008;83:89–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Van der Aa N, Van den Bergh M, Ponomarenko N, Verstraete L, Ceulemans B, Storm K. Analysis of FOXG1 Is Highly Recommended in Male and Female Patients with Rett Syndrome. Mol Syndromol 2011;1:290–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Olson HE, Tambunan D, LaCoursiere C, Goldenberg M, Pinsky R, Martin E, Ho E, Khwaja O, Kaufmann WE, Poduri A. Mutations in epilepsy and intellectual disability genes in patients with features of Rett syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2015;167A:2017–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Allou L, Julia S, Amsallem D, El Chehadeh S, Lambert L, Thevenon J, Duffourd Y, Saunier A, Bouquet P, Pere S, Moustaïne A, Ruaud L, Roth V, Jonveaux P, Philippe C. Rett-like phenotypes: expanding the genetic heterogeneity to the KCNA2 gene and first familial case of CDKL5-related disease. Clin Genet Published Online First: 7 April 2016. doi: 10.1111/cge.12784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Torkamani A, Bersell K, Jorge BS, Bjork RL, Friedman JR, Bloss CS, Cohen J, Gupta S, Naidu S, Vanoye CG, George AL, Kearney JA. De novo KCNB1 mutations in epileptic encephalopathy. Ann Neurol 2014;76:529–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thiffault I, Speca DJ, Austin DC, Cobb MM, Eum KS, Safina NP, Grote L, Farrow EG, Miller N, Soden S, Kingsmore SF, Trimmer JS, Saunders CJ, Sack JT. A novel epileptic encephalopathy mutation in KCNB1 disrupts Kv2.1 ion selectivity, expression, and localization. J Gen Physiol 2015;146:399–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saitsu H, Akita T, Tohyama J, Goldberg-Stern H, Kobayashi Y, Cohen R, Kato M, Ohba C, Miyatake S, Tsurusaki Y, Nakashima M, Miyake N, Fukuda A, Matsumoto N. De novo KCNB1 mutations in infantile epilepsy inhibit repetitive neuronal firing. Sci Rep 2015;5:15199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Allen NM, Conroy J, Shahwan A, Lynch B, Correa RG, Pena SDJ, McCreary D, Magalhães TR, Ennis S, Lynch SA, King MD. Unexplained early onset epileptic encephalopathy: Exome screening and phenotype expansion. Epilepsia 2016;57:e12–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Latypova X, Matsumoto N, Vinceslas-Muller C, Bézieau S, Isidor B, Miyake N. Novel KCNB1 mutation associated with non-syndromic intellectual disability. J Hum Genet Published Online First: 8 December 2016. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2016.154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Johansson S, Berland S, Gradek GA, Bongers E, de Leeuw N, Pfundt R, Fannemel M, Rødningen O, Brendehaug A, Haukanes BI, Hovland R, Helland G, Houge G. Haploinsufficiency of MEIS2 is associated with orofacial clefting and learning disability. Am J Med Genet A 2014;164A:1622–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Louw JJ, Corveleyn A, Jia Y, Hens G, Gewillig M, Devriendt K. MEIS2 involvement in cardiac development, cleft palate, and intellectual disability. Am J Med Genet 2015;167:1142–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fujita A, Isidor B, Piloquet H, Corre P, Okamoto N, Nakashima M, Tsurusaki Y, Saitsu H, Miyake N, Matsumoto N. De novo MEIS2 mutation causes syndromic developmental delay with persistent gastro-esophageal reflux. J Hum Genet 2016;61:835–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Amiel J, Rio M, de Pontual L, Redon R, Malan V, Boddaert N, Plouin P, Carter NP, Lyonnet S, Munnich A, Colleaux L. Mutations in TCF4, Encoding a Class I Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor, Are Responsible for Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome, a Severe Epileptic Encephalopathy Associated with Autonomic Dysfunction. Am J Hum Genet 2007;80:988–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Van Balkom IDC, Vuijk PJ, Franssens M, Hoek HW, Hennekam RCM. Development, cognition, and behaviour in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012;54:925–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hayflick SJ, Kruer MC, Gregory A, Haack TB, Kurian MA, Houlden HH, Anderson J, Boddaert N, Sanford L, Harik SI, Dandu VH, Nardocci N, Zorzi G, Dunaway T, Tarnopolsky M, Skinner S, Holden KR, Frucht S, Hanspal E, Schrander-Stumpel C, Mignot C, Héron D, Saunders DE, Kaminska M, Lin J-P, Lascelles K, Cuno SM, Meyer E, Garavaglia B, Bhatia K, de Silva R, Crisp S, Lunt P, Carey M, Hardy J, Meitinger T, Prokisch H, Hogarth P. β-Propeller protein-associated neurodegeneration: a new X-linked dominant disorder with brain iron accumulation. Brain 2013;136:1708–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Okamoto N, Ikeda T, Hasegawa T, Yamamoto Y, Kawato K, Komoto T, Imoto I. Early manifestations of BPAN in a pediatric patient. Am J Med Genet A 2014;164A:3095–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ohba C, Nabatame S, Iijima Y, Nishiyama K, Tsurusaki Y, Nakashima M, Miyake N, Tanaka F, Ozono K, Saitsu H, Matsumoto N. De novo WDR45 mutation in a patient showing clinically Rett syndrome with childhood iron deposition in brain. J Hum Genet 2014;59:292–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Naidu S, Johnston MV. Neurodevelopmental disorders: Clinical criteria for Rett syndrome. Nat Rev Neurol 2011;7:312–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]