Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2018 Sep 25;56(10):e00330-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00330-18

Lower Airway Bacterial Colonization Patterns and Species-Specific Interactions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

David M Jacobs a,, Heather M Ochs-Balcom b, Jiwei Zhao c, Timothy F Murphy d, Sanjay Sethi d
Editor: Betty A Forbese
PMCID: PMC6156310  PMID: 30045868

Little is known about interactions between nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the lower respiratory tract in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. We characterized colonization by these four bacterial species, determined species-specific interactions, and estimated the effects of host factors on bacterial colonization among COPD patients.

KEYWORDS: bacterial colonization, COPD, interactions, exacerbations

ABSTRACT

Little is known about interactions between nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the lower respiratory tract in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. We characterized colonization by these four bacterial species, determined species-specific interactions, and estimated the effects of host factors on bacterial colonization among COPD patients. We conducted a prospective cohort study in veterans with COPD that involved monthly clinical assessment and sputum cultures with an average duration of follow-up of 4.5 years. Cultures were used for bacterial identification. We analyzed bacterial interactions using generalized linear mixed models after controlling for clinical and demographic variables. The outcomes of interest were the relationships between bacteria based on clinical status (stable or exacerbation). One hundred eighty-one participants completed a total of 8,843 clinic visits, 30.8% of which had at least one of the four bacteria isolated. H. influenzae was the most common bacterium isolated (14.4%), followed by P. aeruginosa (8.1%). In adjusted models, S. pneumoniae colonization was positively associated with H. influenzae colonization (odds ratio [OR], 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03 to 3.73). We identified negative associations between P. aeruginosa and H. influenzae (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.22) and P. aeruginosa and M. catarrhalis (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.75). Associations were similar during stable and exacerbation visits. Recent antimicrobial therapy was associated with a lower prevalence of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis, but not P. aeruginosa. Our findings support the presence of specific interspecies interactions between common bacteria in the lower respiratory tracts of COPD patients. Further work is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms of these complex interactions that shift bacterial species.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) incurs a substantial public health burden and has high morbidity and mortality in the United States and worldwide (1, 2). The progressive course of COPD is accelerated by acute exacerbations that are associated with more frequent hospitalizations and death (35). It is recognized that most exacerbations are caused by bacterial infections; Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the four most common pathogens (6). Bacterial colonization and infection by H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and S. pneumoniae typically occur earlier in the course of COPD, while acquisition of P. aeruginosa is more prevalent in advanced disease (6). Overall, acquisition of a new strain of any of these four pathogens is associated with an exacerbation (7, 8). Chronic colonization of the lower airway by these pathogens in COPD is proinflammatory and is a likely contributor to COPD pathogenesis. Understanding determinants of bacterial acquisition and persistence in the lower airways in COPD is therefore important and as yet poorly understood.

Bacterial colonization patterns in COPD could be influenced by therapeutic interventions, especially antimicrobials, or by host factors, such as age, smoking history, and disease severity (912). In addition, interspecies bacterial interactions can influence which species become established and persist in a given environment, altering the composition of a microbial community and potentially influencing disease incidence and severity (1216). Bacterial species can interact synergistically to promote persistent colonization; alternatively, bacteria can compete for the same environmental niche and reduce colonization. To date, literature on respiratory bacterial interactions is limited to the nasopharynx in young children and has not yet been extended to studies of lower respiratory tract colonization or to adults with COPD.

We characterized bacterial colonization patterns and interactions among the four primary bacterial pathogens in COPD patients during both stable and exacerbation clinical states. The goals of our study were to (i) describe the prevalence of bacterial colonization with H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, S. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa; (ii) determine species-specific interactions; and (iii) estimate the influence of host factors on colonization with the four selected species. We hypothesized that interspecies interactions are an important independent determinant of bacterial colonization patterns in COPD and that this interaction is different in stable disease versus exacerbation. The interactions described in our study represent bacterial cocolonization; however, we use the term “interactions” here in order to maintain consistency with previously published work (11, 12, 1719).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and participants.

We analyzed data from the Bacterial Infection in COPD study, a prospective study of individuals with COPD recruited through an outpatient clinic in the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, between April 1994 and June 2014 (7). Participants were evaluated monthly and whenever they had symptoms suggestive of an exacerbation. The Human Studies Subcommittee of the Veterans Affairs New York Healthcare System approved the study protocol, and all participants gave written informed consent.

A total of 183 adults enrolled in the study. We excluded two adults who did not have any follow-up visits. Of the total number of clinic visits (n = 8,953), 8,843 (99%) visits had sputum culture data available for 7,464 (83%) stable and 1,379 (15%) exacerbation visits. Sputum samples were not available for 110 (1.2%) clinic visits (27 exacerbation and 83 stable visits).

Data collection.

Participants completed an in-depth interview conducted by trained personnel at enrollment, which collected information on demographics, baseline respiratory health history, occupational exposures, smoking history, medical history, current medications, and baseline pulmonary function tests. Subsequently, at each monthly visit, sputum and serum samples were collected, and the participants were also questioned about their chronic respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, cough, sputum production, viscosity, and purulence), and responses were graded 1 (at the usual level), 2 (somewhat worse than usual), or 3 (much worse than usual). Clinical assessment of the cause was prompted by minor worsening of two or more symptoms or major worsening of one or more symptoms. If the patient had a fever (a temperature of ≥38.3°C), appeared ill, or had signs of consolidation on lung examination, a chest film was obtained to rule out pneumonia. If other causes of symptom worsening, such as pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection, and congestive heart failure, were ruled out clinically, the participant was considered to have a COPD exacerbation at that visit. The determination of whether the patient had stable disease or an exacerbation was made by one of two physicians (T.F.M. or S.S.) prior to receipt of sputum culture results.

Sputum samples.

Sputum samples were spontaneously expectorated morning samples homogenized by incubation at 37°C for 15 min with an equal volume of 0.1% dithiothreitol. All the individuals enrolled in the study were patients with chronic bronchitis who received extensive, repeated instruction in providing adequate sputum samples. The samples were assessed macroscopically for adequacy prior to processing (20). Serial dilutions of homogenized sputum in phosphate-buffered saline were placed on blood, chocolate, and MacConkey agar plates. Bacteria were identified using standard techniques. A P6-specific monoclonal antibody was used to distinguish H. influenzae from Haemophilus haemolyticus. Sputum supernatants and pellets were stored at −70°C. Study personnel processing the samples were blinded to the participant's clinical status.

The dynamics of bacterial colonization of the respiratory tract in adults with COPD include patterns that involve the isolation of identical strains from sputum with intervening negative cultures. This phenomenon is known as “gaps” and is defined as a period of negative sputum cultures preceded and followed by clinic visits at which apparently identical strains were isolated. Previous findings have shown that persistent colonization occurs between these gaps and that sputum cultures underestimate the frequency of colonization of the respiratory tract in COPD (8, 20). Therefore, we presumed that colonization was present between clinic visits where identical strains were isolated.

Statistical analyses.

The rates of lower airway colonization by the four potential bacterial pathogens at monthly visits over the course of the study were characterized using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate. The main outcomes of interest were the relationships between bacteria overall and based on clinical status (stable and exacerbation).

Colonization by H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, S. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa was examined using a generalized linear mixed model with random intercept to account for repeat visits. We used the logit link in the model, along with an unstructured covariance structure (SAS version 9.4; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Since each participant contributed multiple sputum samples, we used a repeated-measures design to take into account variability of multiple samples from each participant. P. aeruginosa colonization was examined as a separate covariate in each model to reduce multiple comparisons between organisms. Further, in chronic airway diseases, including cystic fibrosis (CF) and bronchiectasis, P. aeruginosa is the predominant organism in the lower respiratory tract. We hypothesized that P. aeruginosa colonization was associated with a decrease in colonization by the other three organisms, which was another a priori reason for it to be treated as a separate covariate.

Each model included the presence or absence of other bacterial pathogens and additional host factors—age, race, Charlson comorbidity index (21), duration in primary study, pack-years of smoking, smoking status (current versus former), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (percent predicted), and recent antimicrobial therapy (between the last and current visits)–since these factors have been shown to influence colonization patterns (912). For each model, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) for the response pathogen given the presence of each predictor pathogen alone and then jointly, including the additional host factors. To examine the effects of covariates on each of the pathogens of interest based on clinical status, we first modeled colonization of each pathogen individually before separately examining whether bacterial interactions differed according to stable and exacerbation visits.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1. The mean age of participants at study entry was 67 ± 9.2 years, and most were white (88%). The mean baseline Charlson comorbidity index was 4.2 ± 1.5, and the mean FEV1 percent predicted was 49% ± 18%. Participants were followed up for a mean of 4.5 years (median, 3.5 years). Antibiotic use between clinic visits occurred for 1,765 visits (20%), yielding 1,949 total antibiotic courses. The most common antibiotics were azithromycin (20.6%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (10.9%), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (10.5%) (Table 2).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of participants enrolled in the COPD study, Buffalo, NY, April 1994 to June 2014

Characteristica No. (%) or mean ± SD (n = 181)
Age (yr) 67 ± 9.2
Race
    White 159 (88)
    Black 22 (12)
Smoking status
    Former smoker 121 (67)
    Current smoker 60 (33)
Pack-yr of smoking 79 ± 36
FEV1 (liters) 1.64 ± 0.68
FEV1 (% predicted) 49 ± 18
Charlson comorbidity index 4.2 ± 1.5
Duration in study (yr) 4.5 ± 4.0
    Median (IQR) 3.5 (1.5, 5.8)
Antibiotic use between clinic visits
    None 7,078 (80)
    Any 1,765 (20)
a

IQR, interquartile range.

TABLE 2.

Antibiotic utilization between clinic visits among participants enrolled in the COPD study, Buffalo, NY, April 1994 to June 2014

Antibiotic group Antibiotic No. (%) on antibiotic (n = 1,949)a
Penicillins Amoxicillin 171 (8.8)
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 205 (10.5)
Other 46 (2.4)
Cephalosporins Cephalexin 50 (2.6)
Ceftriaxone 46 (2.4)
Other 66 (3.4)
Macrolides Azithromycin 401 (20.6)
Clarithromycin 21 (1.1)
Fluoroquinolones Ciprofloxacin 118 (6.1)
Levofloxacin 164 (8.4)
Moxifloxacin 151 (7.7)
Other 119 (6.1)
Folate antagonists Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 213 (10.9)
Lincosamide Clindamycin 52 (2.7)
Tetracycline Doxycycline 39 (2.0)
a

Antibiotic records were unavailable for 41 subject visits. The following antibiotics used in <20 visits are not included in the table: erythromycin (14 uses), vancomycin (12 uses), metronidazole (10 uses), tetracycline (8 uses), and gentamicin (2 uses).

Bacterial colonization during stable and exacerbation visits.

The distribution and colonization patterns of the four potential bacterial pathogens during stable and exacerbation visits are presented by duration in the study (Table 3). Overall, at least one species was isolated from 30.8% (2,722 of 8,843) of the total visits. Of the 8,843 visits, H. influenzae was the most common bacterial species identified, in 14.4% (n = 1,277) of visits, M. catarrhalis was present in 6.9% (n = 606), and S. pneumoniae was present in 5.7% (n = 500). P. aeruginosa was present in 8.1% (n = 716) of visits. Polymicrobial colonization, defined as two or more of the four pathogens detected at a visit, was observed in 5% of visits.

TABLE 3.

Distribution of 4 major respiratory pathogens collected from adults with COPD, Buffalo Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, USA, 1994 to 2014

Parameter Value [no. (%)] for participants in study for:
Total <1 yr
1–3 yr
>3–5 yr
>5–10 yr
>10 yr
Stable Exacb Stable Exac Stable Exac Stable Exac Stable Exac
Participants 181 32 (18) 50 (28) 34 (19) 49 (27) 16 (9)
Visitsa 8,843 155 37 819 184 1,252 220 3,171 540 2,150 425
Bacteria present
    0 pathogens 6,231 (70) 130 (84) 33 (89) 673 (82) 121 (66) 884 (71) 117 (53) 2,236 (71) 308 (57) 1,490 (69) 239 (56)
    1 pathogen
        S. pneumoniae 247 (2.8) 4 (2.6) 2 (5.4) 27 (3.3) 11 (6.0) 7 (0.56) 3 (1.4) 55 (1.7) 20 (3.7) 101 (4.7) 17 (4.0)
        M. catarrhalis 380 (4.3) 3 (1.9) 1 (2.7) 26 (3.2) 16 (8.7) 36 (2.9) 20 (0.1) 76 (2.4) 35 (6.5) 114 (5.3) 53 (13)
        P. aeruginosa 579 (6.5) 5 (3.2) 1 (2.7) 10 (1.2) 2 (1.1) 98 (7.8) 26 (12) 246 (7.8) 40 (7.4) 116 (5.4) 35 (8.2)
        H. influenzae 957 (11) 7 (4.5) 0 52 (6.4) 22 (12) 185 (15) 32 (15) 373 (12) 78 (14) 157 (7.3) 51 (12)
    2 pathogens
        S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae 128 (1.4) 0 0 1 (0.12) 2 (1.1) 10 (0.8) 0 50 (1.6) 9 (1.7) 49 (2.3) 7 (1.7)
        S. pneumoniae, M. catarrhalis 37 (0.4) 0 0 17 (2.1) 3 (1.6) 5 (0.4) 1 (0.45) 4 (0.13) 1 (0.19) 5 (0.23) 1 (0.24)
        S. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa 51 (0.6) 0 0 1 (0.12) 0 0 0 8 (0.25) 3 (0.56) 35 (1.6) 4 (0.94)
        H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis 115 (1.3) 0 0 2 (0.24) 1 (0.54) 14 (1.1) 7 (3.2) 54 (1.7) 20 (3.7) 13 (0.60) 4 (0.94)
        H. influenzae, P. aeruginosa 41 (0.5) 0 0 1 (0.12) 0 1 (0.08) 2 (0.91) 26 (0.82) 7 (1.3) 3 (0.14) 1 (0.24)
        M. catarrhalis, P. aeruginosa 39 (0.4) 0 0 2 (0.24) 0 4 (0.32) 4 (1.8) 8 (0.25) 8 (1.5) 8 (0.37) 5 (1.2)
    3 pathogens
        S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis 32 (0.4) 0 0 2 (0.24) 0 2 (0.16) 1 (0.45) 6 (0.19) 0 19 (0.88) 2 (0.47)
        S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, P. aeruginosa 3 (0.03) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (0.03) 1 (0.19) 1 (0.05) 0
        S. pneumoniae, M. catarrhalis, P. aeruginosa 2 (0.02) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (0.03) 0 0 1 (0.24)
        H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, P. aeruginosa 1 (0.01) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (0.19) 0 0
a

Bacterial cultures were missing for 110 subject visits.

b

Exac, exacerbation.

When the bacteria were examined individually, the rate of H. influenzae colonization when no other cocolonizing bacteria were present was higher at exacerbation than at stable visits (13.3% versus 10.4%; P = 0.003). Similarly, M. catarrhalis colonization was significantly more frequent at exacerbation than at stable visits (9.1% versus 3.4%; P = 0.0001).

S. pneumoniae colonization alone at stable visits, when no other pathogens were present, was 2.8% (211/7,464) compared to 2.6% (36/1,379) during exacerbation visits (P = 0.72). Colonization by P. aeruginosa alone was slightly higher at exacerbation visits than at stable visits, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (7.5% versus 6.4%; P = 0.12). Visits characterized by colonization by two or more pathogens were significantly more common at exacerbation than at stable visits (7.3% versus 4.6%; P = 0.0001).

Interspecies interactions between H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, S. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa.

The outcomes of colonization with H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and S. pneumoniae are presented in separate models in Table 4. In the model examining H. influenzae colonization as the outcome, H. influenzae was positively associated with S. pneumoniae colonization (OR, 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.09 to 3.73), but not M. catarrhalis (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.32). S. pneumoniae and M. catarrhalis cocolonization was positively associated with H. influenzae colonization (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.91 to 4.17). Colonization by P. aeruginosa resulted in 85% reduction in the odds of H. influenzae colonization (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.22).

TABLE 4.

Determinants and interactions of colonization with the four major bacterial pathogens in COPD patients, Buffalo, NY, USA, April 1994 to June 2014

Characteristic No. (%) of samples (n = 8,843) Adjusted OR (95% CI)a
H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae
Bacteria present
    S. pneumoniae, M. catarrhalis
        Neither 7,808 (88) 1.0 (reference)
        S. pneumoniae only 429 (4.9) 2.79 (2.09–3.73)
        M. catarrhalis only 535 (6.0) 1.01 (0.78–1.32)
        Both 71 (0.8) 2.82 (1.91–4.17)
    H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae
        Neither 7,229 (82) 1.0 (reference)
        H. influenzae only 1,114 (13) 1.11 (0.86–1.44)
        S. pneumoniae only 337 (3.8) 0.86 (0.61–1.20)
        Both 163 (1.8) 0.95 (0.63–1.44)
    H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis
        Neither 7,108 (80) 1.0 (reference)
        H. influenzae only 1,129 (13) 2.81 (2.10–3.77)
        M. catarrhalis only 458 (5.2) 0.82 (0.57–1.18)
        Both 148 (1.7) 2.30 (1.44–3.67)
    P. aeruginosa
        Absent 8,124 (92) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
        Present 719 (8) 0.15 (0.10–0.22) 0.51 (0.35–0.75) 1.34 (0.89–2.02)
Age (yr) (10-yr increase) 0.79 (0.43–1.46) 1.19 (0.77–1.83) 1.49 (0.75–2.96)
Antibiotic therapy between visits
    No 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
    Yes 0.81 (0.67–0.98) 0.62 (0.48–0.79) 0.62 (0.45–0.84)
Race
    White 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
    Nonwhite 1.14 (0.37–3.55) 1.01 (0.45–2.27) 0.24 (0.05–1.14)
Charlson comorbidity index (1-point increase) 1.02 (0.73–1.44) 1.06 (0.83–1.35) 0.75 (0.49–1.13)
Duration in study (1-yr increase) 1.04 (0.95–1.14) 1.05 (0.99–1.12) 1.03 (0.94–1.13)
Smoking status
    Former smoker 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
    Current smoker 0.82 (0.35–1.93) 0.81 (0.45–2.27) 1.54 (0.62–3.84)
Pack-yrs of smoking (10-pack increase) 1.10 (0.99–1.23) 1.06 (0.98–1.14) 0.98 (0.87–1.11)
FEV1 % predicted (10% increase) 1.02 (0.82–1.25) 0.96 (0.82–1.11) 0.94 (0.74–1.20)
a

Significant ORs and 95% CIs are shown in boldface. Each model included variables representing presence of absence of other bacteria, as well as all other variables used.

When stratified based on clinical status (stable versus exacerbation), similar relationships between H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, and M. catarrhalis were apparent during stable visits (Table 5). However, colonization by S. pneumoniae or the combination of S. pneumoniae and M. catarrhalis was not associated with H. influenzae colonization during exacerbation visits. Colonization by P. aeruginosa was negatively associated with H. influenzae colonization during both stable and exacerbation visits.

TABLE 5.

Outcomes of colonization with H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and S. pneumoniae in COPD patients during stable and acute exacerbation visits

Characteristic No. (%) of samples
Adjusted OR (95% CI)a
H. influenzae
M. catarrhalis
S. pneumoniae
Stable (n = 7,464) Exacb (n = 1,379) Stable Exac Stable Exac Stable Exac
Bacteria present
    S. pneumoniae, M. catarrhalis
        Neither 6,693 (90) 1,115 (81) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
        S. pneumoniae only 350 (4.7) 79 (5.7) 3.75 (2.69–5.24) 1.21 (0.64–2.28)
        M. catarrhalis only 360 (4.8) 175 (13) 1.06 (0.76–1.46) 0.90 (0.57–1.43)
        Both 61 (0.8) 10 (0.7) 3.96 (2.50–6.28) 1.09 (0.49–2.42)
    H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae
        Neither 6,165 (83) 1,064 (77) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
        H. influenzae only 888 (12) 226 (16) 1.15 (0.84–1.58) 1.11 (0.73–1.69)
        S. pneumoniae only 270 (3.6) 67 (4.9) 0.83 (0.56–1.24) 0.67 (0.33–1.38)
        Both 141 (1.9) 22 (1.6) 0.96 (0.60–1.53) 0.74 (0.33–1.69)
    H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis
        Neither 6,126 (82) 982 (71) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
        H. influenzae only 917 (12) 212 (15) 3.86 (2.76–5.39) 1.18 (0.64–2.19)
        M. catarrhalis only 309 (4.1) 149 (11) 0.80 (0.53–1.22) 0.60 (0.28–1.28)
        Both 112 (1.5) 36 (2.6) 3.09 (1.81–5.28) 0.71 (0.26–1.89)
    P. aeruginosa
        Absent 6,886 (92) 1,238 (90) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
        Present 578 (7.7) 141 (10) 0.13 (0.08–0.22) 0.26 (0.12–0.56) 0.37 (0.22–0.62) 0.92 (0.53–1.61) 1.67 (1.04–2.68) 0.78 (0.34–1.81)
Age (yr) (10-yr increase) 0.74 (0.38–1.41) 0.83 (0.47–1.44) 1.38 (0.78–2.42) 0.97 (0.67–1.39) 1.62 (0.79–3.32) 0.87 (0.43–1.79)
Antibiotic therapy between visits
    No 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
    Yes 0.77 (0.62–0.97) 0.73 (0.50–1.05) 0.69 (0.50–0.93) 0.44 (0.29–0.66) 0.59 (0.41–0.85) 0.70 (0.40–1.22)
Race
    White 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
    Nonwhite 1.39 (0.41–4.68) 0.77 (0.28–2.10) 0.89 (0.30–2.64) 1.04 (0.55–1.94) 0.17 (0.03–1.00) 0.14 (0.02–1.28)
Charlson comorbidity index (1-point increase) 1.01 (0.70–1.45) 1.08 (0.79–1.49) 1.01 (0.73–1.39) 1.08 (0.86–1.35) 0.71 (0.45–1.11) 1.08 (0.69–1.68)
Duration in study (1-yr increase) 1.02 (0.93–1.12) 1.01 (0.94–1.09) 1.03 (0.95–1.12) 1.05 (1.00–1.10) 1.04 (0.94–1.15) 1.02 (0.92–1.11)
Smoking status
    Former smoker 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
    Current smoker 0.78 (0.31–1.94) 0.92 (0.43–1.94) 1.15 (0.53–2.49) 0.40 (0.24–0.67) 1.75 (0.68–4.55) 0.79 (0.31–2.04)
Pack-yrs of smoking (10-pack increase) 1.12 (1.00–1.26) 1.02 (0.93–1.12) 1.05 (0.95–1.17) 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 0.98 (0.86–1.12) 0.98 (0.88–1.11)
FEV1 % predicted (10% increase) 1.03 (0.83–1.29) 1.04 (0.86–1.25) 0.96 (0.78–1.17) 0.97 (0.85–1.10) 0.94 (0.73–1.20) 0.98 (0.75–1.28)
a

Significant ORs and 95% CIs are shown in boldface. Each model included variables representing presence or absence of other bacteria, as well as all other variables used.

b

Exac, exacerbation.

Neither S. pneumoniae nor H. influenzae was significantly associated with M. catarrhalis colonization individually or when they cocolonized; this did not differ for stable and exacerbation visits. Colonization by P. aeruginosa was associated with a 49% reduction in the odds of M. catarrhalis colonization (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.75). The relationship between M. catarrhalis and P. aeruginosa persisted during stable visits only.

An increase in S. pneumoniae colonization was seen with H. influenzae (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.10 to 3.77) and when H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis were both present (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.44 to 3.67). These relationships were statistically significant only during stable visits (Table 5). P. aeruginosa colonization was positively associated with S. pneumoniae (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.68) during stable visits but not at exacerbation visits (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.81).

Effects of host factors on bacterial colonization.

Table 3 shows that antibiotic therapy between visits was negatively associated with colonization by H. influenzae (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.98), M. catarrhalis (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.79), and S. pneumoniae (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.84). Similar relationships were found when the data were stratified by clinical status (Table 4). Colonization by P. aeruginosa was not significantly associated with antibiotic utilization.

Smoking was positively associated with H. influenzae colonization during stable visits (each 10-pack-year increase, OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.26) and negatively associated with M. catarrhalis colonization during exacerbation visits (current smoker, OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.67). Additional host factors, including age, race, Charlson comorbidity index, and FEV1 percent, were not significantly associated with bacterial colonization.

DISCUSSION

We examined lower respiratory tract colonization with S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and P. aeruginosa in a COPD cohort, and our models indicate significant interspecies interactions. During stable COPD, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae appear to have a positive relationship, while colonization with M. catarrhalis does not appear to interact with these two pathogens. P. aeruginosa has a negative impact on H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis colonization, but not on S. pneumoniae, where actual enhancement of colonization was seen. In exacerbations, the relationship between S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae was no longer seen; however, the negative interaction of P. aeruginosa with H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis persisted. Reduction of interspecies interactions at exacerbation could represent the dominance of a newly acquired bacterial strain and the associated host immune-inflammatory response. Not surprisingly, recent antibiotic therapy was negatively associated with colonization by S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis but not colonization by P. aeruginosa.

Ours is the first clinical study of bacterial interactions in COPD within a prospective study design. The literature regarding interactions between these organisms is limited to studies of nasopharyngeal colonization in children. Madhi et al. (14) investigated nasopharyngeal interactions between S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae in healthy children in South Africa. They reported a synergistic association in which children colonized by S. pneumoniae were more likely to be colonized by H. influenzae than children not colonized by S. pneumoniae (73.9% versus 29.3%; P < 0.0001). Jacoby et al. (13) investigated nasopharyngeal microbial interactions among children in Western Australia and found synergistic associations between S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis. Chien et al. investigated nasopharyngeal bacterial interactions in healthy young Peruvian children and reported a positive association between S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae by both culture and quantitative PCR (qPCR) (17). Our results are similar, having identified positive interactions between S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Conversely, Pettigrew et al. investigated nasopharyngeal bacterial interactions in children with upper respiratory tract infections; the authors found competitive interactions between S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, as well as H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis (12). Interestingly, the competitive balance between S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae was altered by the addition of M. catarrhalis. Cocolonization with H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis was associated with a positive interaction with S. pneumoniae. Similar negative interactions were found by Xu et al. in their analysis of nasopharyngeal colonization in children at the onset of acute otitis media (11). Our results extend the positive associations between S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae seen in most studies of the upper airway to the lower airway in COPD.

The presence of P. aeruginosa in COPD is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function, more frequent exacerbations, and a greater requirement for antibiotic therapy (8, 2225). Our results provide support for the hypothesis that negative interactions exist between P. aeruginosa, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis in COPD. Colonization with P. aeruginosa is better characterized in other chronic lung diseases, including CF and bronchiectasis. In CF, the most commonly isolated bacterium in young patients is Staphylococcus aureus. In older adults with CF, however, P. aeruginosa is the predominant organism, eventually representing over 80% of bacteria in the lung (26, 27). Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the competitive interactions associated with P. aeruginosa in CF. Pernet et al. showed that colonizing P. aeruginosa triggers host cells to produce type IIA secreted phospholipase A2, a host enzyme with bactericidal activity capable of inhibiting S. aureus (28). Filkins et al. found that P. aeruginosa drives S. aureus from aerobic respiration to fermentative metabolism, which reduces S. aureus viability and eventually results in the predominance of P. aeruginosa in the community (29). In bronchiectasis, competitive interactions associated with P. aeruginosa are further supported by Rogers et al., who demonstrated interspecies competition between H. influenzae and P. aeruginosa (30). When H. influenzae or P. aeruginosa was present in the opposite dominant group, the two species were found to be in very low abundance, i.e., patients in the P. aeruginosa-dominant group competitively excluded H. influenzae (P. aeruginosa mean abundance ± standard deviation [SD], 87.3% ± 13.4%; H. influenzae, 0.56% ± 0.77%). These findings are consistent with strong competitive effects between P. aeruginosa and H. influenzae, moving toward competitive exclusion. Given the poor prognosis associated with P. aeruginosa colonization in COPD and other lung diseases, it is important to further understand the mechanistic and clinical implications of these interactions. Interventions that rationally alter the lung microbiota could be envisaged, or novel drug targets could be selected to enable or inhibit these interactions, which may competitively suppress P. aeruginosa colonization and subsequent infection.

The mechanisms of bacterial interaction between S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae have previously been explored. Weimer et al. showed that β-lactamase-producing nontypeable H. influenzae was able to protect biofilm-resident S. pneumoniae from amoxicillin treatment in the chinchilla middle ear (31). Interestingly, the study also showed that a β-lactamase-deficient H. influenzae strain was able to protect biofilm S. pneumoniae from amoxicillin, indicating that β-lactamase plays a role in interspecies synergy but that other factors may also lead to bacterial protection. A study by Cope et al. demonstrated synergy in vitro between H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae, with both species reaching higher cell densities in coculture than in monoculture (32). In the coculture biofilm setting, H. influenzae contact with S. pneumoniae resulted in upregulation of pilA expression, which is known to encode the major subunit of Tfp, by H. influenzae (33). Conversely, some studies have demonstrated competitive interactions between S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. In vitro experiments have shown that S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae coculture leads to a rapid decrease in H. influenzae through the action of hydrogen peroxide (34). However, pneumococcal strains modified not to produce hydrogen peroxide lost their ability to kill H. influenzae. An in vivo mouse model showed that when H. influenzae colonized with S. pneumoniae in the nasopharynx, S. pneumoniae was rapidly cleared (35). The competitive interactions between H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae were dependent on cellular components of H. influenzae activating host complement and neutrophils. Multiple disruptions in innate defense mechanisms are prevalent in COPD, which may explain why pathogen persistence is seen in spite of abundant inflammation in the lower airways in the disease. We believe this could also explain the synergism between the two pathogens that dominates in this study.

Recent antibiotic exposure was associated with a lower prevalence of colonization with S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis. Chronic microbial colonization contributes to chronic inflammation and progressive loss of lung function (7, 9, 36, 37). The potential role of long-term antibiotic use in COPD has previously been investigated, primarily with respect to long-term macrolide therapy (38). Albert et al. (39) investigated the use of 12 months of daily azithromycin in COPD patients at increased risk of exacerbations and reported a reduction in the frequency of acute exacerbations among patients who received azithromycin. Interestingly, a recent study by Pettigrew et al. showed that macrolides were ineffective at eradicating H. influenzae and that fluoroquinolones were a more effective antibiotic in eradicating H. influenzae in individuals with COPD (40). For P. aeruginosa, we did not observe any association between antibiotic therapy and colonization. A previous analysis of the same cohort reported that antibiotics did not fully account for P. aeruginosa clearance, with only 32% of P. aeruginosa cases cleared in the presence of any antibiotic therapy (8). Our results reinforce the finding that antibiotics may play only a minor role in P. aeruginosa clearance and that factors other than antibiotics may facilitate P. aeruginosa clearance from the respiratory tract in COPD patients. Further studies on the effect of bacterium-host-antimicrobial interactions in the lower respiratory tracts of COPD patients are necessary to better understand the observed shifts in bacterial species. Our findings could guide therapeutic choices in stable COPD and at exacerbation. We confirm that recent antibiotic therapy can render sputum culture results unreliable. Most exacerbations are caused by a dominant pathogen, likely driven by new strain acquisition, supporting targeted antibiotic therapy based on sputum cultures. Propensity for a chronic infected phenotype could be driven by bacterial synergism in stable COPD. Though Pseudomonas emergence reduces other Gram-negative bacteria, S. pneumoniae is not diminished. Further, current smokers are more likely to be infected with H. influenzae than with M. catarrhalis.

This study had several strengths, including the prospective study design, the large number of repeated samples, and careful documentation and diagnosis of COPD exacerbations. We examined lower respiratory tract bacterial carriage during exacerbations, a time when patients are at risk of further complications. A limitation of our study is that we did not evaluate bacterium-virus interactions, as viruses were not examined within the primary study. Viruses are known to cause COPD exacerbations and have been detected in up to 15% of sputum samples during stable COPD (6). The mechanisms by which viruses influence bacterial colonization are diverse, and it is possible that these interactions may have influenced those observed (41). Further, the lung microbiota includes multiple bacterial taxa and bacterial families, and the interrelationship between these bacteria most likely influences which species are dominant within the lower airways of COPD patients (4244). Colonization patterns may also be interrelated with the host immune response and the presence of exacerbation symptoms. A longitudinal study using culture-independent techniques is necessary to further evaluate these bacterial interactions in the lung microbiome, as well as the influence of host factors on microbial composition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate relationships between bacteria over time, not to explore the mechanisms by which the bacteria interact. Further work is necessary to better understand the mechanisms of interaction and clinical significance between bacteria in the lower respiratory tract in COPD patients. The COPD patients in our sample were older and predominantly male, with moderate to severe COPD at baseline. Further study of mild disease in young patients with female gender representation is required to determine if the identified bacterial relationships are applicable across the spectrum of COPD. Finally, based on previous findings, we presumed that colonization was present between clinical visits when an identical strain was isolated (8, 20). These bacteria are present far more often than is revealed by sputum cultures, and by not including gaps, we would underestimate the true frequency of bacterial colonization of the lower respiratory tract in adults with COPD.

In summary, our work presents novel insight into interspecies interactions, including both positive and negative, between common pathogenic bacteria in patients with COPD. A greater understanding of how bacteria interact with each other in the lower respiratory tract may have important implications for the treatment of COPD. Vaccines may also play a role in the microbial ecology of the lower respiratory tract, and whether this is beneficial or detrimental to interspecies interaction is unknown. These interactions may offer novel therapeutic opportunities to alter the characteristics of the airway microbiota. Optimal treatment of COPD may be enhanced through personalized strategies for strain-specific therapy by screening microbial communities and analyzing the probability of strain replacement and subsequently reducing bacterial infection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

D.M.J. is supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes Loan Repayment Program (1 L30 HL138791-01). The COPD study was supported by VA Merit Review grants to T.F.M. and S.S. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number ULTR001412.

The content is solely our responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH.

We have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mannino DM, Buist AS. 2007. Global burden of COPD: risk factors, prevalence, and future trends. Lancet 370:765–773. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61380-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rabe KF, Watz H. 2017. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet 389:1931–1940. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31222-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A, Locantore N, Mullerova H, Tal-Singer R, Miller B, Lomas DA, Agusti A, Macnee W, Calverley P, Rennard S, Wouters EF, Wedzicha JA, ECLIPSE. 2010. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 363:1128–1138. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Suissa S, Dell'Aniello S, Ernst P. 2012. Long-term natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: severe exacerbations and mortality. Thorax 67:957–963. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Soler-Cataluna JJ, Martinez-Garcia MA, Roman Sanchez P, Salcedo E, Navarro M, Ochando R. 2005. Severe acute exacerbations and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 60:925–931. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.040527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sethi S, Murphy TF. 2008. Infection in the pathogenesis and course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 359:2355–2365. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0800353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sethi S, Evans N, Grant BJ, Murphy TF. 2002. New strains of bacteria and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 347:465–471. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murphy TF, Brauer AL, Eschberger K, Lobbins P, Grove L, Cai X, Sethi S. 2008. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:853–860. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200709-1413OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Patel IS, Seemungal TA, Wilks M, Lloyd-Owen SJ, Donaldson GC, Wedzicha JA. 2002. Relationship between bacterial colonisation and the frequency, character, and severity of COPD exacerbations. Thorax 57:759–764. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.9.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zalacain R, Sobradillo V, Amilibia J, Barron J, Achotegui V, Pijoan JI, Llorente JL. 1999. Predisposing factors to bacterial colonization in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 13:343–348. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13b21.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu Q, Almudervar A, Casey JR, Pichichero ME. 2012. Nasopharyngeal bacterial interactions in children. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1738–1745. doi: 10.3201/eid1811.111904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pettigrew MM, Gent JF, Revai K, Patel JA, Chonmaitree T. 2008. Microbial interactions during upper respiratory tract infections. Emerg Infect Dis 14:1584–1591. doi: 10.3201/eid1410.080119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jacoby P, Watson K, Bowman J, Taylor A, Riley TV, Smith DW, Lehmann D, Kalgoorlie Otitis Media Research Project Team. 2007. Modelling the co-occurrence of Streptococcus pneumoniae with other bacterial and viral pathogens in the upper respiratory tract. Vaccine 25:2458–2464. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Madhi SA, Adrian P, Kuwanda L, Cutland C, Albrich WC, Klugman KP. 2007. Long-term effect of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on nasopharyngeal colonization by Streptococcus pneumoniae–and associated interactions with Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae colonization–in HIV-Infected and HIV-uninfected children. J Infect Dis 196:1662–1666. doi: 10.1086/522164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Regev-Yochay G, Dagan R, Raz M, Carmeli Y, Shainberg B, Derazne E, Rahav G, Rubinstein E. 2004. Association between carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in children. JAMA 292:716–720. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.6.716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Laufer AS, Metlay JP, Gent JF, Fennie KP, Kong Y, Pettigrew MM. 2011. Microbial communities of the upper respiratory tract and otitis media in children. mBio 2:e00245-. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00245-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chien YW, Vidal JE, Grijalva CG, Bozio C, Edwards KM, Williams JV, Griffin MR, Verastegui H, Hartinger SM, Gil AI, Lanata CF, Klugman KP. 2013. Density interactions among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus in the nasopharynx of young Peruvian children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32:72–77. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318270d850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pettigrew MM, Gent JF, Pyles RB, Miller AL, Nokso-Koivisto J, Chonmaitree T. 2011. Viral-bacterial interactions and risk of acute otitis media complicating upper respiratory tract infection. J Clin Microbiol 49:3750–3755. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01186-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dunne EM, Murad C, Sudigdoadi S, Fadlyana E, Tarigan R, Indriyani SAK, Pell CL, Watts E, Satzke C, Hinds J, Dewi NE, Yani FF, Rusmil K, Mulholland EK, Kartasasmita C. 2018. Carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Staphylococcus aureus in Indonesian children: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 13:e0195098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Murphy TF, Brauer AL, Schiffmacher AT, Sethi S. 2004. Persistent colonization by Haemophilus influenzae in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170:266–272. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200403-354OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. 1987. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lode H, Allewelt M, Balk S, De Roux A, Mauch H, Niederman M, Schmidt-Ioanas M. 2007. A prediction model for bacterial etiology in acute exacerbations of COPD. Infection 35:143–149. doi: 10.1007/s15010-007-6078-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Miravitlles M, Espinosa C, Fernandez-Laso E, Martos JA, Maldonado JA, Gallego M. 1999. Relationship between bacterial flora in sputum and functional impairment in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Study Group of Bacterial Infection in COPD. Chest 116:40–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eller J, Ede A, Schaberg T, Niederman MS, Mauch H, Lode H. 1998. Infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: relation between bacteriologic etiology and lung function. Chest 113:1542–1548. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.6.1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murphy TF. 2009. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med 15:138–142. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328321861a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Razvi S, Quittell L, Sewall A, Quinton H, Marshall B, Saiman L. 2009. Respiratory microbiology of patients with cystic fibrosis in the United States, 1995 to 2005. Chest 136:1554–1560. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Folkesson A, Jelsbak L, Yang L, Johansen HK, Ciofu O, Hoiby N, Molin S. 2012. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: an evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:841–851. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pernet E, Guillemot L, Burgel PR, Martin C, Lambeau G, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Sands D, Leduc D, Morand PC, Jeammet L, Chignard M, Wu Y, Touqui L. 2014. Pseudomonas aeruginosa eradicates Staphylococcus aureus by manipulating the host immunity. Nat Commun 5:5105. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Filkins LM, Graber JA, Olson DG, Dolben EL, Lynd LR, Bhuju S, O'Toole GA. 2015. Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa drives S. aureus towards fermentative metabolism and reduced viability in a cystic fibrosis model. J Bacteriol 197:2252–2264. doi: 10.1128/JB.00059-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rogers GB, van der Gast CJ, Serisier DJ. 2015. Predominant pathogen competition and core microbiota divergence in chronic airway infection. ISME J 9:217–225. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Weimer KE, Juneau RA, Murrah KA, Pang B, Armbruster CE, Richardson SH, Swords WE. 2011. Divergent mechanisms for passive pneumococcal resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in the presence of Haemophilus influenzae. J Infect Dis 203:549–555. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiq087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cope EK, Goldstein-Daruech N, Kofonow JM, Christensen L, McDermott B, Monroy F, Palmer JN, Chiu AG, Shirtliff ME, Cohen NA, Leid JG. 2011. Regulation of virulence gene expression resulting from Streptococcus pneumoniae and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae interactions in chronic disease. PLoS One 6:e28523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bakaletz LO, Baker BD, Jurcisek JA, Harrison A, Novotny LA, Bookwalter JE, Mungur R, Munson RS Jr. 2005. Demonstration of type IV pilus expression and a twitching phenotype by Haemophilus influenzae. Infect Immun 73:1635–1643. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1635-1643.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pericone CD, Overweg K, Hermans PW, Weiser JN. 2000. Inhibitory and bactericidal effects of hydrogen peroxide production by Streptococcus pneumoniae on other inhabitants of the upper respiratory tract. Infect Immun 68:3990–3997. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.7.3990-3997.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lysenko ES, Ratner AJ, Nelson AL, Weiser JN. 2005. The role of innate immune responses in the outcome of interspecies competition for colonization of mucosal surfaces. PLoS Pathog 1:e1. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Banerjee D, Khair OA, Honeybourne D. 2004. Impact of sputum bacteria on airway inflammation and health status in clinical stable COPD. Eur Respir J 23:685–691. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00056804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sethi S, Maloney J, Grove L, Wrona C, Berenson CS. 2006. Airway inflammation and bronchial bacterial colonization in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173:991–998. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200509-1525OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wilson R, Sethi S, Anzueto A, Miravitlles M. 2013. Antibiotics for treatment and prevention of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Infect 67:497–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Albert RK, Connett J, Bailey WC, Casaburi R, Cooper JA Jr, Criner GJ, Curtis JL, Dransfield MT, Han MK, Lazarus SC, Make B, Marchetti N, Martinez FJ, Madinger NE, McEvoy C, Niewoehner DE, Porsasz J, Price CS, Reilly J, Scanlon PD, Sciurba FC, Scharf SM, Washko GR, Woodruff PG, Anthonisen NR, COPD Clinical Research Network. 2011. Azithromycin for prevention of exacerbations of COPD. N Engl J Med 365:689–698. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pettigrew MM, Tsuji BT, Gent JF, Kong Y, Holden PN, Sethi S, Murphy TF. 2016. Effect of fluoroquinolones and macrolides on eradication and resistance of Haemophilus influenzae in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:4151–4158. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00301-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bosch AA, Biesbroek G, Trzcinski K, Sanders EA, Bogaert D. 2013. Viral and bacterial interactions in the upper respiratory tract. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003057. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cabrera-Rubio R, Garcia-Nunez M, Seto L, Anto JM, Moya A, Monso E, Mira A. 2012. Microbiome diversity in the bronchial tracts of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Microbiol 50:3562–3568. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00767-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pragman AA, Kim HB, Reilly CS, Wendt C, Isaacson RE. 2012. The lung microbiome in moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS One 7:e47305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Huang YJ, Kim E, Cox MJ, Brodie EL, Brown R, Wiener-Kronish JP, Lynch SV. 2010. A persistent and diverse airway microbiota present during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Omics 14:9–59. doi: 10.1089/omi.2009.0100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES