Abstract
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a bone marrow failure (BMF) syndrome that arises from mutations in a network of FA genes essential for DNA interstrand crosslink (ICL) repair and replication stress tolerance. While allogeneic stem cell transplantation can replace defective HSCs, interventions to mitigate HSC defects in FA do not exist. Remarkably, we reveal here that Lnk (Sh2b3) deficiency restores HSC function in Fancd2−/− mice. Lnk deficiency does not impact ICL repair, but instead stabilizes stalled replication forks in a manner, in part, dependent upon alleviating blocks to cytokine−mediated JAK2 signaling. Lnk deficiency restores proliferation and survival of Fancd2−/− HSCs, while reducing replication stress and genomic instability. Furthermore, deletion of LNK in human FA-like HSCs promotes clonogenic growth. These findings highlight a new role for cytokine/JAK signaling in promoting replication fork stability, illuminate replication stress as a major underlying origin of BMF in FA, and have strong therapeutic implications.
Loss of Fancd2 leads to replication stress intolerance and Fanconi Anemia, where haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) function is compromised. Here, the authors show that Lnk/Sh2b3 loss restores HSC proliferation and survival in Fancd2 knockout mice and ameliorates replication stress in a cytokine/JAK2 signaling dependent manner.
Introduction
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are characterized by their ability to self-renew and differentiate into multilineage blood cells1,2. They are the source of all circulating blood cells throughout life, and disruption of HSC homeostasis is associated with a variety of human disorders1,2. Faithful maintenance of genome integrity in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) populations is crucial to hematopoiesis and suppression of blood-derived cancers. DNA repair deficiency, prominently illustrated by Fanconi anemia (FA) syndromes, results in progressive bone marrow failure (BMF) and cancer susceptibility3,4. Mutations within 22 genes have been identified as causative factors for FA. These genes cooperate in a genome stability network that is essential for repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) and relief of replication stress5. Cells derived from FA patients are hypersensitive to ICL-inducing agents mitomycin C (MMC) and cisplatin, and exhibit DNA damage checkpoint and mitosis defects5. Unrepaired DNA damage in HSPCs increases genome instability and leukemia/cancer in FA patients. The loss of HSPCs in FA is thought to be a consequence of multiple mechanisms, including impaired HSPC function, genotoxicity from the endogenous ICL agent, aldehyde6,7, physiological proliferative stress8, elevated p53 levels9, hypersensitivity to inflammatory cytokines10,11, oxidative stress12, and a hyperactive TGFbeta pathway13. However, how cellular signaling pathways converge on HSPC function to modify phenotypic outcomes in the context of FA mutations remains enigmatic. Importantly, other than allogeneic transplantation, therapeutic interventions that mitigate the HSPC defects in FA do not exist.
The FA pathway involves mono-ubiquitination of FANCD2-FANCI proteins by the FA core complex in addition to a parallel or downstream function of homologous recombination (HR) proteins, including the breast cancer suppressors BRCA1/214-17. In addition to their established roles in repair of ICLs, the FA/BRCA protein network is activated by replication stress. This DNA repair-independent requirement for FA proteins, including FANCD2 and BRCA1/2, protects stalled replication forks from degradation18,19. These additional functions of the FA/BRCA proteins play a critical role in preventing genomic instability and suppressing tumorigenesis18–20. However, it remains to be determined how they are regulated by extracellular signals during physiologic hematopoiesis and whether stalled replication fork stability contributes to HSC attrition and BMF in vivo.
HSPC homeostasis is under the control of cytokine signaling pathways. One such important signaling axis is initiated by thrombopoietin (TPO) engagement of its cognate receptor, MPL to activate JAK2 tyrosine kinase signaling21. Tpo−/− and Mpl−/− mice exhibit marked reduction in HSC activity and HSC self-renewal22,23. MPL loss-of-function mutations are found in congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (CAMT) patients, many of whom progress into BMF during childhood24. A critical negative regulator of the TPO/MPL pathway in HSCs is the adaptor protein LNK (or SH2B3)25–27. Lnk deficiency leads to a >10-fold increase in HSC numbers owing to superior HSC self-renewal26,28. Furthermore, Lnk deficiency strongly mitigates HSC aging and delays HSC exhaustion in serial transplants29. LNK directly interacts with phosphorylated JAK2 in a TPO-dependent manner, and Lnk deficiency potentiates JAK2 activation and signaling in HSPCs25.
In this study, we tested the hypothesis that Lnk deficiency would ameliorate HSC defects associated with FA. Remarkably, concomitant Lnk deficiency restored HSC function in Fancd2−/− mice to wild-type levels without accelerating neoplastic transformation. Surprisingly, LNK did not overtly affect ICL repair in Fancd2−/− cells but reduced spontaneous DNA damage and genome instability. This correlated with Lnk deficiency alleviating replication stress by stabilizing stalled replication forks in a manner dependent upon cytokine-mediated JAK2 signaling. Hence, these findings shed light on the underlying origin of BMF in FA patients and have implications for new therapeutic strategies.
Results
Lnk deficiency restores phenotypic HSCs in Fancd2−/− mice
Mouse models of FA recapitulate cellular DNA repair defects and impaired HSPC function. To study if concomitant deletion of a negative regulator of cytokine signaling in HSCs, LNK, would restore HSPCs in mice deficient for Fancd2, a central component of the FA signaling pathway, we generated double nullizygous mice for Fancd2 and Lnk. Complete blood counts revealed significantly elevated white blood cell and platelet numbers in Lnk−/− mice, as previously reported31,35. Fancd2−/− mice exhibited normal blood counts despite HSPC defects, consistent with previous reports30. Importantly, Fancd2−/−;Lnk−/− mice showed similar blood counts to that of Lnk−/− mice (Fig. 1a).
Fancd2−/− mice are reported to have an ~50% reduction in HSPCs as indicated by Lineage-Kit+Sca1+ (LSK) cells30,36. However, the long-term (LT-) HSCs are only about 5% of the LSK fraction. To further pinpoint the defects in various HSPC compartments, we utilized a panel of cell surface markers to differentiate HSCs from multipotent progenitors (MPPs). Fancd2−/− mice on a pure C57/B6J background exhibited a 50% reduction in MPPs while the phenotypic HSCs trended lower than wild type (WT) but this did not reach significance (Fig. 1b, c). Notably, loss of Lnk fully restored phenotypic HSCs in Fancd2−/− mice as defined by SLAM markers (CD150+CD48-LSK)37 or CD34−Flk2−LSK38 markers, or the most stringent and current markers for LT-HSCs (CD150+CD48−CD34−Flk2−LSK)39,40 (Fig. 1d, e). In fact, Fancd2−/−;Lnk−/− double mutant mice had more phenotypic HSCs than WT animals (Fig. 1b-e). We next analyzed subpopulations within the MPP compartments as defined previously41,42. Lnk deficiency markedly increased HSCs and primitive MPP (MPP1, CD34+Flk2-CD150−CD48− LSK), but not MPP2 (Flk2−CD150+CD48+ LSK, megakaryocyte/erythroid-biased MPP) or MPP3 (Flk2−CD150−CD48+ LSK, myeloid-biased MPP), and slightly increased MPP4 (Flk2+CD150− LSK, lymphoid-biased MPP) (Fig. 1f). Fancd2−/−;Lnk−/− double mutant mice had more phenotypic HSC and MPP1 than WT animals, but no statistically significant difference in MPP2-4 (Fig. 1f). Thus, Lnk deficiency fully restores phenotypic HSCs and primitive MPP1 in Fancd2−/− mice, but does not significantly alter lineage-biased MPPs.
Lnk deficiency rescues Fancd2−/− BM reconstitution ability
To assess if Lnk deficiency rescues the functional defects in Fancd2−/− BM cells, we transplanted a graded number of unfractionated BM cells into lethally irradiated recipients. Fancd2−/− BM cells showed markedly compromised reconstitution in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) assays (Fig. 2a) consistent with previous reports. Notably, the phenotypes we observed on the pure C57/B6 background were more severe than previous reports on mixed background30,36. Strikingly, the reconstituting ability of Fancd2−/−;Lnk−/− BM cells was restored to WT levels (Fig. 2a). To test the self-renewal ability of HSCs, we performed serial BMTs. Although the donor percentage in the BM and various progenitor/MPP populations in Fancd2−/−;Lnk−/− transplanted mice were inferior to WT transplanted mice at the end of primary transplant, donor percentage in the HSC compartment were on par with WT transplanted mice (Fig. 2b). Notably, there were more LSKs and HSCs in Fancd2−/−;Lnk−/− transplanted mice than WT transplanted mice (Suppl. Figure 1), suggesting an overall increase in HSC reconstitution upon concomitant deletion of Lnk and Fancd2. As a result, Lnk deficiency largely restored HSC self-renewal in Fancd2−/− BM cells in secondary and tertiary transplants, albeit slightly less than WT cells (Fig. 2c, d). Fancd2−/− BM cells had near zero reconstitution in the transplants, underscoring the profound functional defects of FA cells as well as the significance of the rescue by Lnk deficiency. Of note, none of the serially transplanted mice developed leukemia.
Lnk deficiency restores HSC functions in Fancd2−/− mice
Since Fancd2−/−;Lnk−/− double mutant mice have an increased number of phenotypic HSCs as assessed by cell surface markers, total BM transplants might reflect the number rather than the functionality of HSCs. Thus, we purified HSCs through Fluorescence-activated cytometric sorting (FACS) and injected equal numbers of HSCs into irradiated host animals. Our data showed that Fancd2−/− HSCs also had a cell-intrinsic defect in reconstituting the hematopoietic system, while Lnk deficiency rescued the HSC functional defects associated with FA (Fig. 2e).
Lnk deficiency does not restore Fancd2−/− HSC quiescence
We reported previously that Lnk−/− HSCs are more quiescent25, which protects them from regenerative stress. In contrast, FA-deficient HSCs show decreased quiescence and compromised self-renewal30,36. It is plausible that the rescued HSC compartment in double knockout (DKO) mice simply reflects an accumulating quiescent HSC population. To address this possibility, we quantified in vivo cell cycle kinetics in HSPC subsets. We found that Fancd2−/−Lnk−/− HSCs were less quiescent than WT HSCs and showed a similar cell cycle profile to that of Fancd2−/− HSCs (Fig. 2f, g). Lnk−/− MPPs were significantly more quiescent than WT MPPs; however, Fancd2−/−Lnk−/− MPPs showed a similar cell cycle profile to that of Fancd2−/− MPPs (Fig. 2f, g). These data suggest that the restoration of Fancd2−/− HSC activity to WT levels by Lnk deficiency is not be due to a restoration of HSC quiescence.
Lnk deficiency does not rescue HSPC MMC hypersensitivity
The hallmark of FA in humans is the hypersensitivity to ICL-inducing agents. This feature is recapitulated in all FA mouse models. To explore the mechanisms by which Lnk deficiency ameliorates HSPC defects associated with FA, we first examined the MMC sensitivity of BM progenitor cells. Using both liquid culture growth assays and clonogenic survival assays, we found that both Fancd2−/−Lnk−/− and Fancd2−/− BM progenitors are strongly sensitive to MMC in comparison to WT progenitors (Fig. 3). Lnk−/− single KO BM cells show similar MMC sensitivity to that of WT (Fig. 6b). Thus, Lnk deficiency does not appear to play an overt role in ICL repair.
Lnk deficiency restores HSPC growth and genome stability
BM progenitors from BMF syndromes show growth retardation even in the absence of DNA damage-inducing reagents43. Thus, we subjected BM progenitor cells from Fancd2−/− mice to liquid cultures in the presence of cytokines. Indeed, Fancd2−/− HSPCs showed progressive loss of growth in comparison to that of WT or Lnk−/− HSPCs (Fig. 4a). Importantly, Lnk deficiency rescued the growth disadvantage of Fancd2−/− BM cells (Fig. 4a) as well as colony forming-unit (CFU) progenitors (Fig. 4b). FA cells are observed to have a higher rate of apoptosis44, consistent with our observations of a doubling in the percentage of apoptotic cells in Fancd2−/− culture relative to WT (Fig. 4c). Despite these changes, the cell cycle progression remained essentially unperturbed in short-term cultures (Fig. 4d). Importantly, the percentage of apoptotic cells in DKO was markedly reduced in comparison to Fancd2−/− cells (Fig. 4e), indicating that Lnk deficiency ameliorates the survival defect of FA.
The increased apoptosis in Fancd2−/− cells may be attributable to a higher level of genome instability. Thus, we examined chromosomal abnormalities in ex vivo cultured progenitors from all genotypes. Metaphase spreads from nocodazole arrested BM HSPCs were prepared45. At least 30 metaphases from each sample were scored for the presence of sister chromatid breaks, gaps, and radial chromosome aberrations, which are hallmarks of ICL repair deficiency in FA. Chromosomal abnormalities were elevated in Fancd2−/− cells as expected, which was partially suppressed by Lnk loss (Fig. 4e, f). Primary splenic B cells have been widely used to study molecular and cellular defects in FA mouse models20. To assess if Lnk deficiency restores genome instability in cell types other than BM HSPCs, we examined chromosomal aberrations in B cells, a cell type known to express Lnk. In agreement with genetic interactions in BM, genome instability in Fancd2−/− B cells was also significantly elevated, while Lnk deficiency restored it to near WT levels (Fig. 4g). Together, these results reveal that Lnk deficiency suppresses proliferative and apoptotic abnormalities, while reducing genome instability in the Fancd2-deficient cells. Collectively, these data reveal genetic suppression of FA-mutation-associated hematopoietic phenotypes and genome instability by Lnk deficiency.
Lnk deficiency restores HSPCs upon forced proliferation
FA cells are impaired by accumulated DNA damage from physiological stress during forced proliferation induced by transplantation or by administration of polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (pI:pC)8. To determine whether Lnk deficiency rescues Fancd2−/− HSPC function in context of endogenous replication stress, we induced HSPC proliferation in vivo by repeated treatment with pI:pC. We then examined phenotypic HSCs by FACS and HSC functions by BMT (Fig. 5a). Phenotypic HSCs were reduced in Fancd2−/− mice relative to WT after pIpC stress, while HSCs remained expanded in Lnk−/− mice (Fig. 5b, c). Importantly, Lnk deficiency restored HSC numbers in Fancd2−/− mice (Fig. 5b, c). Functionally, Fancd2−/− BM cells repopulated to a very limited extent upon stress (Fig. 5d, e). Remarkably, BMs from double nullizygous mice repopulated on par with WT in two independent experiments (Fig. 5d, e), indicating robust LT-HSC activity. Taken together, these data show that Lnk deficiency preserves HSC function in Fancd2−/− mice upon physiological replication stress.
Lnk deficiency stabilizes stalled replication forks in FA
Cells deficient in FA/BRCA are sensitive to replication poisons, such as hydroxyurea (HU). To investigate a potential role of LNK in replication stress, we examined HU sensitivity of BM progenitor cells using clonogenic survival assays. Fancd2−/− HSPCs showed a reduction in CFU progenitors upon HU treatment, and Lnk deficiency rescued progenitor clonogenic ability in Fancd2−/− mice (Fig. 6a). In contrast, Lnk deficiency failed to rescue clonogenic ability of Fancd2−/− HSPCs upon a number of ICL-inducing agents, including MMC, cisplatin, and formaldehyde (Fig. 6b). Thus, our data suggest that Lnk deficiency alleviates replication stress but not ICL-induced genotoxic stress associated with FA.
To examine the mechanisms by which Lnk loss ameliorates replication stress associated with FA, we treated BM progenitors with HU and examined the stabilization of stalled replication forks by single-molecule DNA fiber analysis as described34. Replication tracts of log-phase cultured HSPCs were sequentially pulse labeled with IdU and CldU before replication fork stalling by HU (Fig. 6c, d). Single DNA fibers were spread onto microscope slides before immunofluorescence staining with antibodies against IdU and CldU to measure relative fork length (CldU/IdU ratio). The relative shortening of the CIdU tract after HU treatment serves as a measure of replication fork degradation. WT and Lnk−/− HSPCs cultured in cytokines showed a mean CIdU/IdU tract ratio close to 1 (Fig. 6c, d), indicating minimal replication fork degradation. However, Fancd2-deficient cells exhibited a significant reduction in the relative CIdU tract length as previously reported18,19 (Fig. 6c, d). Importantly, we discovered that loss of Lnk protected stalled replication fork from degradation upon replication stress in Fancd2−/− progenitors as well as Fancd2−/− B cells (Fig. 6c, d). This is in agreement with our result showing that Lnk deficiency conferred resistance to HU in clonogenic survival of HSPCs (Fig. 6a).
Cytokine–JAK2 signaling stabilizes stalled replication fork
Since LNK negatively regulates the cytokine receptor-associated JAK2 kinase, we next asked whether its role in fork protection was cytokine signaling dependent. Since BM HSPCs depend upon cytokines for their survival in culture, we were unable to withdraw cytokines from BM culture. However, by removing IL-4 from the splenic B cell culture, it is possible to evaluate the role of cytokine-JAK signaling in isolation while still providing mitogenic stimuli to proliferating B cells through Toll-like receptor signaling. In these conditions, we found that Lnk deficiency restored replication fork protection in the presence of IL-4, but failed to rescue Fancd2- null B cells from replication fork degradation in the absence of IL-4 (Fig. 6e), suggesting that cytokine/JAK signaling plays a role in replication fork stabilization.
We next attempt to decipher the signaling pathways that contribute to replication fork stability in Lnk null HSPCs. LNK is a cytoplasmic adaptor protein that is not known to associate with chromatin. We previously reported that Lnk deficiency potentiates JAK2 activation in HSPCs, which in part accounts for its role in HSC self-renewal25–27,31. To define the role of JAK2 in replication fork stability, we subjected WT and Lnk−/− HSPCs to JAK inhibitors (Ruxolitinib) and examined its effects on replication fork stability. We found that WT, Lnk−/−, and Fancd2−/−Lnk−/− HSPCs were all sensitive to JAKi in stabilizing stalled replication fork (Fig. 6f). Fancd2−/− HSPCs exhibited markedly reduced forks as previously reported but were not further shortened by JAKi (Fig. 6f). Importantly, the inhibitor Mirin prevented forks from degrading in all conditions, suggesting both JAKi conferred and FA-associated fork degradation were mediated by the nuclease MRE11 (Fig. 6f). Our data suggest that JAK signaling contributes to stalled replication fork stabilization in HSPCs through inhibiting MRE11-mediated nuclease activity.
It has been shown that the p53/p21 pathway is activated in FA cells and loss of p53 is able to partially restore the HSC defect in FA deficiency9. We thus examined p53 activation in the context of Fancd2 and Lnk deficiency. By examining the expression of p53 target gene p21, we showed that p53 activation at steady-state in vivo was very low in Fancd2−/− mice, in comparison to irradiation-induced acute p53 activation (Suppl. Figure 1), consistent with a recent report46. In this context, Lnk deficiency did not significantly reduce the modest p53 activation in Fancd2−/− HSPCs (Suppl. Figure 1).
LNK depletion restores FA-like human progenitor cell growth
Our mouse genetic studies suggest Lnk as a potential target for increasing HSC number/function in the context of FA. Thus, we tested the effects of LNK deficiency in FA-like HSPCs, generated by knocking down FANCD2 as previously reported in normal umbilical cord blood (UCB) HSPCs (Fig. 7)9,33. We showed that miR30-based shRNA knockdown of LNK exhibited high efficiency in depleting LNK proteins similarly to CRISPR/Cas9 (Fig. 7c)47. We then performed a proof-of-concept experiment in FA-like HSPCs generated by knocking down FANCD2, followed by LNK in human HSPCs. Our data showed that LNK depletion restored the growth and colony-formation ability of FA-like HSPCs (Fig. 7b).
Discussion
This report demonstrates that loss of Lnk restores FA HSPC functions in part by alleviating replication stress. These findings represent a rare in vivo example of genetic suppression of FA-associated HSC defects commensurate with restoration of genome stability. In contrast to p53 loss, which restores hematopoietic function in FA mice concomitant with elevated genome instability and cancer, Lnk loss suppresses FA-associated HSC defects and increases genome integrity. Moreover, our results reveal a previously-unappreciated role for the JAK signaling pathway in promoting replication and genome stability. They are also suggestive that extracellular signals could be important modifiers of intrinsic deficits present in HSC from FA patients and other syndromes stemming from replication stress. To our knowledge, such a phenotypic reversal has not been reported for the canonical FA pathway. These results have several parallels to suppression of BRCA1 null phenotypes by concomitant loss of 53BP148–50, which restored in vivo viability while reducing genomic instability and cancer. Very few animal models exhibit elevated HSC numbers and function51. Understanding how Lnk deficiency imparts this remarkable enhancement in HSC fitness will likely advance our understanding of stem cell biology and offer insights into strategies for the treatment of FA and other BMF diseases in general.
Lnk deficiency increased phenotypic and functional HSCs in Fancd2−/− mice as assessed by numerous independent parameters. HSC activity in reconstituting lethally irradiated recipient mice was largely restored to WT level in the absence of Lnk and Fancd2. Moreover, Lnk deficiency mitigated HSC exhaustion upon physiological stress caused by repeated pIpC treatment. The ex vivo results were also consistent with the in vivo BMT data, as reconstitution of myelo-ablated animals is a form of “forced” proliferation. Lnk deficiency did not protect HSC quiescence in FA, rather it allowed Fancd2−/− HSCs to proliferate and self-renew as a consequence of reducing replication stress. Previous work demonstrated that p53/p21 activation contributes to the HSPC decline and BMF in FA99. However, p53/p21 upregulation observed in freshly- isolated Fancd2−/− HSPCs were not changed in cells with concomitant loss of Lnk, suggesting that the rescue of FA stem cells by Lnk deficiency at the steady-state in vivo cannot be attributed to p53 inhibition. Nonetheless, it is possible that Lnk deficiency reduces p53/p21 induction and/or other p53 regulated genes in the stress conditions. While it has been previously demonstrated that the survival of Fancd2−/− cells can be improved by inactivation of apoptotic signaling with deletion of p539 or inflammatory signaling with inactivation of TNFα signaling52, the genomic instability in Fancd2−/− cells was not demonstrably suppressed in these scenarios. In contrast to the aforementioned modifying pathways, Lnk deficiency mitigates replication stress-incurred chromosomal aberrations in FA mice and prevents HSPCs attrition without further accelerating leukemic transformation.
Our study raises the question of what causes the underlying stem cell attrition and BMF in FA patients. It has been suggested that endogenous aldehydes, in the forms of acetaldehydes from cellular lipid peroxidation and formaldehydes from histone, and nucleic acid demethylation, lead to ICL DNA damage6,53. Indeed, FA patients and mice are more sensitive to deficiencies in the aldehyde detoxification enzymes Aldh2 and Adh56,53. Our findings show that Lnk deficiency protects stalled replication forks from degradation and stabilizes genome integrity of Fancd2−/− HSPCs without restoring ICL-induced DNA repair. Therefore, replication stress may also be an important mechanism for HSC attrition and BMF in FA. Lnk deficiency increases stem cell fitness and alleviates HU-incurred replication stress. This translates to a superior HSC self-renewal and serial transplantability upon forced proliferation in vivo or in vitro. We speculate this DNA repair-independent mechanism is an important cause of HSC exhaustion in FA, which is illustrated by the rescue of Lnk deficiency in mitigating replication stress. Interestingly, relief of replication stress rather than restoration of DNA repair has also been invoked as the basis for genetic suppression of BRCA null phenotypes20,54. Although our data suggest that LNK does not have an overt role in ICL repair, it does not exclude a role for LNK in alternate DNA repair pathways. The downstream effectors of FA proteins, BRCA1,2 and RAD51, play critical roles in HR, which contributes to FA pathogenesis and genome stability. Lnk deficiency could increase replication-associated HR, as HR plays a crucial role in the survival of BRCA2 deficient mammary epithelial cells55. Moreover, TPO was shown to increase DNA repair efficiency in HSCs through an enhanced non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) mechanism upon irradiation56. Thus, increased NHEJ and/or HR in the absence of Lnk may help Fancd2−/− HSC survival. Future efforts are warranted to formally test if LNK plays a role in other types of DNA repair in physiologically relevant cells. How cytokine receptor signaling affects DNA repair is not understood and this has implications for genome integrity in cancer and response to chemotherapy for FA.
LNK is a cytoplasmic adaptor protein, which is not known to associate with chromatin. A recent large-scale proteome effort identified hundreds of proteins enriched in nascent chromatin57. However, LNK was not among them and has not been implicated in functioning within the nucleus. Given its role in limiting cytokine signaling, we hypothesize that LNK regulates the activity of kinase cascades that transmit their signals to the nucleus to affect the expression or activity of DNA replication and repair proteins. Indeed, a role for JAK2 in replication and HR has been suggested. Overexpression and activation of WT JAK2 increases both RAD51 foci formation and HR activity without affecting NHEJ58. The oncogenic JAK2 mutant (V617F) found in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPNs) is associated with increased DNA damage and replication stress58,59; however, JAK2V617F+ MPN patients typically remain clinically and cytogenetically stable over decades60, perhaps through upregulation of RECQL561. Lnk deficiency potentiates JAK2 activation; however, it does not result in constitutive activation of JAK2 or cytokine-independent growth in HSPCs25. This important distinction between Lnk deficiency and the JAK2V617F oncogenic mutant provides a probable explanation for their distinct consequences on replication stress. Our results highlight the importance of cytokine-mediated JAK2 signaling in ameliorating replication stress in primary HSPCs. This highlights a new role for cytokine/JAK signaling in promoting replication fork stability, along with its established role in signaling transcription. Future efforts are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms by which LNK-regulated JAK signaling functions in replication stress alleviation. Taken together, our data suggest that replication stress mitigation, but not ICL repair, contributes to this remarkable rescue of FA stem cells by Lnk deficiency. It is appreciated that LNK-regulated signaling pathways may play pleiotropic roles in FA stem cells, including stalled replication fork protection, oxidative stress mitigation, and reduction of replication-associated DNA damage as well as p53 induction, all of which could contribute to the impact of LNK in HSC fitness and suppression of FA.
Notably, TPO agonist Eltrombopag showed encouraging clinical results in treating aplastic anemia and restores trilineage hematopoiesis in refractory severe aplastic anemia62,63. Our data on the TPO/JAK2 regulator LNK suggest that Eltrombopag might be an effective therapeutic for FA patients. However, we caution that TPO alone may not be sufficient to restore hematopoiesis or prevent HSC attrition in human FA. It is noted that TPO was included in our ex vivo HSPC culture, but it was not sufficient to mitigate genome instability, protect stalled replication fork, or prevent apoptosis in Fancd2−/− murine HSPCs. Thus, we propose in a model (Fig. 8) that LNK exerts its function in a TPO/MPL/JAK2-dependent and independent manner. Of great clinical relevance, we provide a proof-of-concept experiment showing that deletion of LNK in human FA-like HSPCs promoted clonogenic growth. Thus, our results suggest a future therapeutic use of LNK inactivation to expand human HSPCs from FA patients.
Methods
Mice
Fancd2−/− mice were generously provided by Dr. Alan D’Andrea (Dana Farber Cancer Institute) 30 and Lnk−/− mice by Dr. Tony Pawson 31 (Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Canada), respectively. All mice were on C57/B6J background (CD45.2). Transplant competitor cells were from SJL (CD45.1) mice and transplant recipients were progenies of SJL and C57/B6J (F1). Mice 2–6 months old of both sexes were used in the studies. The protocol (#2016–7–781) for this work is approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use committee (IACUC) of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP).
Constructs
The miR30-based shRNA targeting human LNK (CAAAGATGATGTCTGTCCG) was constructed into the lentiviral vector (pCL20.MSCV.mir30.PGK.mCherry) generously provided by Dr. Shannon McKinney-Freeman32. The pTRIP-MND-GFP lentiviral vector containing shRNA to FANCD2 was generously provided by Drs. Ceccaldi and Soulier9,33. ShRNAs targeting Luciferase were used as controls in both vectors.
Western blot analysis
For western blot (WB) analysis, cells were directly lysed in in LDS reagent (Invitrogen), lysates resolved on Tris-Glycine polyacrylamide gels (National Diagnostics) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Protran). The WBs were carried out with the following antibodies: LNK (rabbit anti human LNK peptide antibody, 1:1000), FANCD2 (rabbit anti- human FNACD2, Novus Biologicals #NB100–182, 1:1000) and Actin (goat anti- Actin Santa Cruz #sc-1616, clone I-19, 1:1000). Secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase against rabbit or goat IgG were used (Jackson Immunoresearch, #711–035–152 and #305–035–045, respectively, 1:20,000) followed by detection with Western Lightning chemiluminescent reagent (Perkin Elmer). Uncropped scans are shown in Supplemental Fig. 2.
Primary human CD34 + HSPC cell isolation/ transduction
De-identified UCB was obtained from New York Blood Center. CD34 + HSPCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation (Lymphoprep, SepMate-50 tubes, Stemcell Tech), followed by magnetic separation on an AutoMACS Pro using microbeads conjugated with anti-CD34 antibodies (Miltenyi). CD34 + cells were cultured overnight in StemSpan SFEM II (Stemcell Tech.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin, L-glutamine, 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 μM SR-1 (Stemcell Tech.), 100 ng/mL SCF, 40 ng/mL FLT3L, 50 ng/mL TPO, 20 ng/mL IL3, 20 ng/mL IL6, and 15 ng/mL GM-CSF (Peprotech Inc). Subsequently, cells were sequentially transduced by spinoculation at 1500 RPM at 37 C for 90 min on retronectin-coated plates loaded with pTRIP-MND-GFP (first transduction) or pCL20.MSCV.mir30.PGK.mCherry (second transduction) lentiviral particles in culture media in the presence of 10 μg/mL polybrene. Subsequently, mCherry + GFP + cells were sorted and plated onto semi-solid methylcellulose media (Methocult H4230, Stemcell Tech) supplemented with 5 U/mL EPO, 10 ng/mL IL-3, 5 ng/mL SCF, 5 ng/mL GM-CSF. Colonies were enumerated 12–14 days after plating.
Antibodies
Antibodies used for HSC FACS and sorting were: Lineage (biotin-conjugated anti-Gr-1 (RB6–8C5), -Mac1 (M1/70), -B220 (RA3–6B2), -CD19 (eBio1D3), -Ter119 (TER-119), -CD5 (53–7.3), -CD4 (GK1.5), -CD8 (53–6.7) at 1:40 dilution), along with APC-Cy7-c-Kit (2B8), PerCP-cy5.5-Sca1 (E13–161.7 or D7), FITC -CD48 (HM48–1), PE-Cy7-CD150 (TC15–12F12.2), APC -CD34 (RAM34), and PE–Flk2 (A2F10.1), at 1:200–1:400 dilutions. Peripheral blood was analyzed using 1:200 dilution of anti PE-Cy7-CD45.1 (A20), APC-Cy7-CD45.2 (104), APC -CD19 (eBio1D3), PE -CD3e (145–2C11), or APC -Gr-1 (RB6–8C5), and PE–Mac1 (M1/70). FACS antibodies were purchased from eBioscience, BD Biosciences or BioLegend. BrdU analog CldU was detected by anti-BrdU (Abcam BU1/75, ab6326, 1:100 dilution) and AF488 anti rat antibodies (Invitrogen A-11006, 1:200), and IdU by anti-BrdU (BD B44, 347580, 1:100) and AF568 anti mouse antibodies (Invitrogen, A-11031, 1:200).
Hematology, flow cytometry and cell sorting
Complete blood count was measured using a Hemavet 950 (Drew Scientific). For flow analysis of peripheral blood, red blood cells were first lysed then stained for donor reconstitution (CD45.1, CD45.2) in myeloid (Gr-1, Mac1) or lymphoid (CD19, CD3) lineages (all used as 1:200 dilution). All peripheral blood data was acquired using the BD Canto flow cytometer. For bone marrow analysis of transplanted mice, cells were stained with APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD45.1, Lineage (biotin-Ter-119, -Mac-1, -Gr-1, -CD4, -CD8α, -CD5, -CD19 and -B220) followed by staining with streptavidin-PE-TexasRed (Invitrogen SA1017, 1:50), and the HSPC panel: -c-Kit-APC, -Sca1-PE, -CD150-PE-Cy7, -CD48-FITC (1:200 dilution). Data for bone marrow analysis was collected on the BD Fortessa flow cytometer. For HSPC subset analysis, kit-APC-Cy7, Sca1-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD150-PE-Cy7, -CD48-FITC, CD34-APC, and Flk2-PE antibodies (1:200) were added to the FACS panel. All flow cytometry data was analyzed using FlowJo v8.7 for MAC.
For sorting, HSPCs were pre-enriched using a lineage depletion kit with magnetic separation (Miltenyi). Lin- cells were stained with the HSPC panel. One hundred LT-HSCs (SLAM LSK) were sorted using a drop envelope of 1.25 using a BD Aria sorter into individual wells of a 96-well plate containing 100 µL of StemSpan SFEM (STEMCELL) with 2% fetal bovine serum (SAFC Biosciences). Competitor cells were added directly to each well in 50 µL of PBS with 2% fetal bovine serum, then transplanted. HSPCs (LSK) for in vitro assays were Lin-depleted and sorted on the MoFlo Astrios EQ using the “purify” setting.
Bone marrow transplant
Total bone marrow or sorted LT-HSCs (CD150 + CD48-c-kit + Sca1 + Lin-) from donor mice were mixed with 3 × 105 freshly isolated competitor (B6.SJL) cells and injected retro-orbitally into lethally irradiated (10 Gy, split dose, Orthovoltage Precision X-Ray) F1 recipient mice. At 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks post transplantation, peripheral blood of recipients was analyzed for donor reconstitution in myeloid, T- and B- lineages by flow cytometry. At 16 weeks post transplant, recipients were sacrificed and donor reconstitution in various HPSC compartments was analyzed using flow cytometry. BM cells from primary transplants were harvested and 2 million cells were injected into each secondary recipient. Tertiary transplants were similarly performed.
pI:pC
Mice were injected with 5 mg/kg pI:pC (InvivoGen) i.p. twice weekly for 4 weeks. On day 28, BM cells were isolated and HSCs were quantified by FACS. One or two million total bone marrow cells from pI:pC-treated mice were transplanted into each lethally irradiated recipients.
Colony forming assay
Total BM or sorted LSK cells were plated onto M3434 semi-solid methylcellulose media (STEMCELL Technologies). Plates were seeded in triplicate in the absence or presence of different drugs. Colonies were enumerated 7–12 days after plating.
Liquid culture of primary HSPCs and splenic B cells
Sorted LSK were cultured in 96-well plates containing 100 µL StemSpan supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% L-glutamine, 100 µM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 10 ng/mL TPO, and 50 ng/mL SCF (Peprotech Inc), with or without MMC. Cells were seeded at a density of 100,000/mL in triplicate and maintained at less than 1 million/mL throughout culture by subculture into fresh media. Viable cells were counted using a Hemacytometer (Hausser Scientific) using Trypan Blue (STEMCELL technologies).
Splenic B cells were cultured in 6-well plates containing 2.5 mL RPMI (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies), 1% sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies), 50 µM β-mercaptoethanol, 5 ng/mL murine IL-4 (Life Technologies), 0.5 µg/mL RP105 (BD Pharmingen, 552128, 1:100), and 25 µg/mL LPS (Sigma).
Cell cycle and apoptosis assays
Cell cycle analysis was performed using a BrdU kit (BD Biosciences, 552598). Cells were exposed to BrdU for 30 min and BrdU incorporation was assessed according to manufacturer’s instructions. For analysis of apoptosis, cells were incubated with anti-Annexin V antibody (Biolegend, 556420, 1:100) in Annexin V binding buffer (BD Biosciences) for 15 min. Cells were then stained with 7-AAD (BD Biosciences). Both BrdU and Annexin V staining data were acquired using a BD Canto flow cytometer.
Cell cycle analysis on HSPCs from BM was performed with freshly isolated HSPCs. Lin-depleted BM cells were stained for HSPC markers, then fixed and permeabilized followed by staining with anti-Ki-67-APC antibodies (eBio 50–5698–80). Cell cycle analysis is performed along with DAPI staining for DNA content and assessed on a BD Fortessa flow cytometer.
Metaphase spreads
Splenic B cells or LSKs were cultured for 3 or 7 days, respectively, and then treated with 0.5 µM Nocodazole (Calbiochem) for 3 h to arrest in metaphase. Cells were incubated in 75 mM potassium chloride (Sigma) at 37 °C for 20 min to swell cell volume, and subsequently fixed with 3:1 methanol: acetic acid for 10 min on ice. Metaphase spreads were then prepared by dropping cells onto methanol-washed positively charged slides. Slides were stained with Giemsa stain and sealed. Images of 100–150 metaphase spreads from 4–6 individual animals were captured using ×100 objective and chromosomal breaks and radial chromosomes were visually counted using FIJI software.
Fork protection assay
Fork protection assay of single-molecule DNA fibers was performed similarly as in published protocols20,34. Briefly, splenic B cells or sorted LSKs were cultured for 3 days then replicating DNA was labeled by a 30 minute pulse with 50 µM IdU (Sigma) followed by a 30 minute pulse with 250 µM CldU (Sigma). Cells were washed then treated with HU (Sigma) (4 mM for spleenic B cells or 2 mM for BM HSPCs) for 3 h. Cells were lysed directly on positively charged microscope slides and then tipped to 30° to spread single DNA fibers. Slides were subsequently fixed and DNA denatured and neutralized. Slides were incubated with anti-CIdU (rat, abcam) and IdU (mouse, BD Biosciences) primary followed by goat anti-rat AF488 and goat anti-mouse AF568 (Invitrogen) secondary antibodies. DNA fibers were captured using ×100 or ×60 objective on a Nikon Eclipse 80i fluorescent microscope and quantified using FIJI software.
Statistical analysis
For all cell culture, CFC assay and BMT assays, two-tailed Student’s t-tests were performed. Graphs are presented as mean ± SEM. For metaphase analysis, statistical comparisons were made using one-tailed ANOVA and Tukey’s post test in PRISM software. For DNA fiber ratios in the DNA fiber fork protection assays, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance test was used for nonparametric data, and comparisons between individual groups were calculated using Dunn’s multiple comparison post test in PRISM software. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
W.T. is supported by NIH grants R01HL095675 and R01HL133828, awards from Fanconi Anemia Research Fund, Department of Defense, the Basser Center for BRCA Team Science Grant, and a Leukemia Lymphoma Society (LLS) Scholar Award. R.A.G. is supported by NIH grants R01CA174904 and R01 CA138835, and by the Basser Center for BRCA. J.B. is supported by a NRSA F31CA180604–01 and the Patel Family Award. N.H. is supported by a NRSA F31HL139091.
Author contributions
J.B., J.J., Q.J., W.T., and R.A.G. designed experiments and interpreted results. J.B., W.T., and R.A.G. wrote and edited the manuscript. J.B., J.J., Q.J., K.R., Y.L., K.L., B.S., V.C., N.H., J-G.R., and W.L. performed experiments.
Data availability
All relevant data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These author contribute equaly: Joanna Balcerek, Jing Jiang
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-06380-1.
References
- 1.Jordan CT, McKearn JP, Lemischka IR. Cellular and developmental properties of fetal hematopoietic stem cells. Cell. 1990;61:953–963. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90061-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morrison SJ, Uchida N, Weissman IL. The biology of hematopoietic stem cells. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 1995;11:35–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.11.110195.000343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parmar K, D’Andrea A, Niedernhofer LJ. Mouse models of Fanconi anemia. Mutat. Res. 2009;668:133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kee Y, D’Andrea AD. Molecular pathogenesis and clinical management of Fanconi anemia. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:3799–3806. doi: 10.1172/JCI58321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kennedy RD, D’Andrea AD. The Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway: new faces in the crowd. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2925–2940. doi: 10.1101/gad.1370505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Garaycoechea JI, et al. Genotoxic consequences of endogenous aldehydes on mouse haematopoietic stem cell function. Nature. 2012;489:571–575. doi: 10.1038/nature11368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Langevin F, Crossan GP, Rosado IV, Arends MJ, Patel KJ. Fancd2 counteracts the toxic effects of naturally produced aldehydes in mice. Nature. 2011;475:53–58. doi: 10.1038/nature10192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Walter D, et al. Exit from dormancy provokes DNA-damage-induced attrition in haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2015;520:549–552. doi: 10.1038/nature14131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ceccaldi R, et al. Bone marrow failure in fanconi anemia is triggered by an exacerbated p53/p21 DNA damage response that impairs hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:36–49. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Haneline LS, et al. Multiple inhibitory cytokines induce deregulated progenitor growth and apoptosis in hematopoietic cells from Fac−/− mice. Blood. 1998;91:4092–4098. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li J, et al. TNF-alpha induces leukemic clonal evolution ex vivo in Fanconi anemia group C murine stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:3283–3295. doi: 10.1172/JCI31772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Du W, Adam Z, Rani R, Zhang X, Pang Q. Oxidative stress in Fanconi anemia hematopoiesis and disease progression. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2008;10:1909–1921. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang H, et al. TGF-b inhibition rescues hematopoietic stem cell defects and bone marrow failure in Fanconi anemia. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:668–681. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moldovan GL, D’Andrea AD. How the fanconi anemia pathway guards the genome. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009;43:223–249. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Howlett NG, et al. Biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 in Fanconi anemia. Science. 2002;297:606–609. doi: 10.1126/science.1073834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kottemann MC, Smogorzewska A. Fanconi anaemia and the repair of Watson and Crick DNA crosslinks. Nature. 2013;493:356–363. doi: 10.1038/nature11863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sawyer SL, et al. Biallelic mutations in BRCA1 cause a new Fanconi anemia subtype. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:135–142. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schlacher K, Wu H, Jasin M. A distinct replication fork protection pathway connects Fanconi anemia tumor suppressors to RAD51-BRCA1/2. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schlacher K, et al. Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell. 2011;145:529–542. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ray Chaudhuri A, et al. Replication fork stability confers chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient cells. Nature. 2016;535:382–387. doi: 10.1038/nature18325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kaushansky K. Thrombopoietin: a tool for understanding thrombopoiesis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2003;1:1587–1592. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kimura S, Roberts AW, Metcalf D, Alexander WS. Hematopoietic stem cell deficiencies in mice lacking c-Mpl, the receptor for thrombopoietin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:1195–1200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Solar GP, et al. Role of c-mpl in early hematopoiesis. Blood. 1998;92:4–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ballmaier M, et al. c-mpl mutations are the cause of congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2001;97:139–146. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.1.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bersenev A, Wu C, Balcerek J, Tong W. Lnk controls mouse hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and quiescence through direct interactions with JAK2. J. Clin. Invest. 2008;118:2832–28448. doi: 10.1172/JCI35808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Seita J, et al. Lnk negatively regulates self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells by modifying thrombopoietin-mediated signal transduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:2349–2354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606238104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Buza-Vidas N, et al. Cytokines regulate postnatal hematopoietic stem cell expansion: opposing roles of thrombopoietin and LNK. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2018–2023. doi: 10.1101/gad.385606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ema H, et al. Quantification of self-renewal capacity in single hematopoietic stem cells from normal and Lnk-deficient mice. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:907–914. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bersenev A, et al. Lnk deficiency partially mitigates hematopoietic stem cell aging. Aging Cell. 2012;11:949–959. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00862.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Parmar K, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell defects in mice with deficiency of Fancd2 or Usp1. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1186–1195. doi: 10.1002/stem.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Velazquez L, et al. Cytokine signaling and hematopoietic homeostasis are disrupted in Lnk-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:1599–1611. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holmfeldt P, et al. Functional screen identifies regulators of murine hematopoietic stem cell repopulation. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:433–449. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ceccaldi R, et al. Spontaneous abrogation of the G(2)DNA damage checkpoint has clinical benefits but promotes leukemogenesis in Fanconi anemia patients. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:184–194. doi: 10.1172/JCI43836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jiang Q, et al. MERIT40 cooperates with BRCA2 to resolve DNA interstrand cross-links. Genes Dev. 2015;29:1955–1968. doi: 10.1101/gad.264192.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Takaki S, et al. Control of B cell production by the adaptor protein lnk. Definition of a conserved family of signal-modulating proteins. Immunity. 2000;13:599–609. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00060-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang QS, et al. Fancd2−/− mice have hematopoietic defects that can be partially corrected by resveratrol. Blood. 2010;116:5140–5148. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-278226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kiel MJ, Yilmaz OH, Iwashita T, Terhorst C, Morrison SJ. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell. 2005;121:1109–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Osawa M, Hanada K, Hamada H, Nakauchi H. Long-term lymphohematopoietic reconstitution by a single CD34-low/negative hematopoietic stem cell. Science. 1996;273:242–245. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5272.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wilson A, et al. Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell. 2008;135:1118–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Foudi A, et al. Analysis of histone 2B-GFP retention reveals slowly cycling hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;27:84–90. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pietras EM, et al. Functionally distinct subsets of lineage-biased multipotent progenitors control blood production in normal and regenerative conditions. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cabezas-Wallscheid N, et al. Identification of regulatory networks in HSCs and their immediate progeny via integrated proteome, transcriptome, and DNA methylome analysis. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15:507–522. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rio P, et al. In vivo proliferation advantage of genetically corrected hematopoietic stem cells in a mouse model of Fanconi anemia FA-D1. Blood. 2008;112:4853–4861. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-156356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ridet A, et al. Deregulated apoptosis is a hallmark of the Fanconi anemia syndrome. Cancer Res. 1997;57:1722–1730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tang J, et al. Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013;20:317–325. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Garaycoechea JI, et al. Alcohol and endogenous aldehydes damage chromosomes and mutate stem cells. Nature. 2018;553:171–177. doi: 10.1038/nature25154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lv K, et al. CBL family E3 ubiquitin ligases control JAK2 ubiquitination and stability in hematopoietic stem cells and myeloid malignancies. Genes Dev. 2017;31:1007–1023. doi: 10.1101/gad.297135.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cao L, et al. A selective requirement for 53BP1 in the biological response to genomic instability induced by Brca1 deficiency. Mol. Cell. 2009;35:534–541. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bunting SF, et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell. 2010;141:243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bouwman P, et al. 53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010;17:688–695. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rossi L, et al. Less is more: unveiling the functional core of hematopoietic stem cells through knockout mice. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:302–317. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang H, et al. TGF-beta inhibition rescues hematopoietic stem cell defects and bone marrow failure in Fanconi anemia. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:668–681. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pontel LB, et al. Endogenous formaldehyde is a hematopoietic stem cell genotoxin and metabolic carcinogen. Mol. Cell. 2015;60:177–188. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Guillemette S, et al. Resistance to therapy in BRCA2 mutant cells due to loss of the nucleosome remodeling factor CHD4. Genes Dev. 2015;29:489–494. doi: 10.1101/gad.256214.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Feng W, Jasin M. BRCA2 suppresses replication stress-induced mitotic and G1 abnormalities through homologous recombination. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:525. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00634-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.de Laval B, et al. Thrombopoietin-increased DNA-PK-dependent DNA repair limits hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell mutagenesis in response to DNA damage. Cell. Stem. Cell. 2013;12:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Alabert C, et al. Nascent chromatin capture proteomics determines chromatin dynamics during DNA replication and identifies unknown fork components. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014;16:281–293. doi: 10.1038/ncb2918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Plo I, et al. JAK2 stimulates homologous recombination and genetic instability: potential implication in the heterogeneity of myeloproliferative disorders. Blood. 2008;112:1402–1412. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chen E, et al. JAK2V617F promotes replication fork stalling with disease-restricted impairment of the intra-S checkpoint response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:15190–15195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401873111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tefferi A, et al. Long-term survival and blast transformation in molecularly annotated essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014;124:2507–2513. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-579136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chen E, et al. RECQL5 suppresses oncogenic JAK2-induced replication stress and genomic instability. Cell Rep. 2015;13:2345–2352. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Townsley DM, et al. Eltrombopag added to standard immunosuppression for aplastic anemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:1540–1550. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Desmond R, et al. Eltrombopag restores trilineage hematopoiesis in refractory severe aplastic anemia that can be sustained on discontinuation of drug. Blood. 2014;123:1818–1825. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-534743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.