Abstract
Objective
We aimed to compare the rates of “surfactant treated respiratory disease” and other neonatal morbidities among moderately preterm (MPT) infants exposed to no, partial, or a complete course of antenatal corticosteroids (ANS).
Study Design
This observational cohort study evaluated MPT infants (290/7–336/7 weeks’ gestational age), born between January 2012 and November 2013 and enrolled in the “MPT Registry” of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.
Results
Data were available for 5,886 infants, including 676 with no exposure, 1225 with partial, and 3,985 with a complete course of ANS. Among no, partial, and complete ANS groups, respectively, there were significant differences in rates of delivery room resuscitation (4.1, 1.4, and 1.2%), surfactant-treated respiratory disease (26.5, 26.3, and 20%), and severe intracranial hemorrhage (3, 2, and 0.8%). Complete ANS course was associated with lower surfactant-treated respiratory disease, compared with partial ANS (odds ratio [OR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.74), and no ANS groups (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.41–0.66) on adjusted analysis.
Conclusion
In MPT infants, ANS exposure is associated with lower delivery room resuscitation, surfactant-treated respiratory disease, and severe intracranial hemorrhage; with the lowest frequency of morbidities associated with a complete course.
Keywords: antenatal steroids, surfactant, gestational age, intracranial hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis
Moderately preterm (MPT) neonates (born between 290/7 and 336/7 weeks’ gestational age [GA]) represented approximately 2% of all births and 20% of all preterm births in the United States in 2014, and remain a relatively understudied group of high-risk infants.1 MPT infants are at higher risk of adverse neonatal morbidities and long-term behavioral problems and disabilities including cerebral palsy, learning difficulties, and autism, compared with infants born at 37 weeks’ GA or later.2–6
The National Institute of Health consensus conference in 1994 supported the administration of antenatal corticosteroids (ANS) to women who are likely to deliver prior to 34 weeks’ GA.7 ANS administration has been noted to improve survival and to reduce rates of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and intra-cranial hemorrhage (ICH) among preterm neonates.8–10
Previous studies have evaluated outcomes of collective cohorts of extremely preterm neonates as well as MPT neonates ranging from 24 to 34 weeks’ GA.9,11,12 At present, there is a scarcity of data on morbidities among MPT neonates born after exposure to a complete or a partial course of ANS in comparison to those born without any ANS exposure. Despite recommendation for administration of ANS to women at risk of preterm delivery (< 34 weeks’ GA), there is limited evidence to guide ANS use among women at risk of delivering MPT infants. As the risk of mortality and morbidities among MPT infants is different from infants born at extreme prematurity, benefits and risks associated with exposure to ANS among MPT infants may be different from those noted in extreme premature infants.
The primary aim of the current study was to compare the rates of surfactant-treated respiratory disease and other neonatal morbidities among a cohort of recently born MPT neonates exposed to no, partial, and a complete course of ANS. The secondary aims were to evaluate the risk factors associated with surfactant-treated respiratory disease in MPT infants, and to evaluate the association between no, partial, or complete ANS and neonatal morbidities at GAs from 29 to 33 weeks.
Methods
Study Design
This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a cohort of MPT infants born between January 2012 and November 2013 who were part of the Moderate Preterm Registry of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Neonatal Research Network (NRN).13 The Moderate Preterm Registry included infants born at GA 290/7 to 336/7 weeks and admitted prior to 72 hours of age at NRN centers.13 All participating sites obtained approval from their Institutional Review Board prior to data collection. All sites, except three, received waiver of consent for collection of data.
Study Population
All neonates born at GA 290/7 to 336/7 weeks and enrolled in the Moderate Preterm Registry were included. Outborn infants and infants with major congenital anomalies were excluded from the analysis. Patients were classified into three groups: no ANS, partial ANS (1 dose of betamethasone, or < 4 doses of dexamethasone), and complete course of ANS (2 doses of betamethasone, or 4 doses of dexamethasone).
Maternal data including race, marital status, medical insurance, maternal hypertension, clinical chorioamnionitis, histologic chorioamnionitis (based on placental pathology), prolonged rupture of membranes (> 18 hours), mode of delivery, multiple births, and ANS administration were collected. Maternal hypertension was defined as either systolic blood pressure above 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure above 90 mm Hg on at least two occasions, either before or during pregnancy. Major congenital anomalies were defined as either the anomalies that were incompatible with life or incompatible with life without drastic surgical or other measures.
Neonatal data were collected from birth until death, discharge, or 40 weeks’ postmenstrual age, whichever occurred first, and included GA in completed weeks and days, birth weight, gender, resuscitation in the delivery room (DR), Apgar score, severity of ICH, presence of cystic periventricular leukomalacia (cPVL), endotracheal intubation, surfactant administration, respiratory support at 28 days of life, sepsis, dates of first oral feeding and full oral feedings, and NEC. Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) was defined as clinical evidence of PDA or confirmed by an echocardiogram.
We evaluated advanced level of resuscitation in the DR, defined as receipt of chest compression, and/or epinephrine. Severe ICH was defined as grade 3 or 4 ICH based on the head ultrasound (HUS) with the most severe grade of hemorrhage within first 28 days of age recorded.14 cPVL was defined as the presence of cystic echolucencies in the periventricular white matter on HUS closest to 28 days or closest to 36 weeks. NEC was defined by modified Bell’s stage ≥ IIA.15 Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as birth weight less than the tenth percentile based on the Alexander growth curve.16 Early and late-onset sepsis was defined by positive blood cultures taken before or after 72 hours of postnatal age, respectively.
Outcomes
The primary outcome was surfactant-treated respiratory disease.
Secondary outcomes were resuscitation and endotracheal intubation in the DR, in-hospital mortality, severe ICH, oxygen use at 28 days, and length of hospital stay.
Statistical Analysis
Distributions and proportions of baseline demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes were tabulated for the no ANS, partial ANS, and complete ANS groups. Continuous variables were expressed as mean values ± standard deviation and categorical variables as counts and percentages. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared among the three groups using chi square test, t-test, and analysis of variance as appropriate.
Multiple logistic regression or general linear regression models were constructed for primaryand secondaryoutcomes to evaluate the association of ANS use after adjusting for GA, SGA, histologic chorioamnionitis, gender, race, health insurance, and center selected a priori. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) or regression coefficient estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each covariate in the models.
We evaluated the association between ANS and neonatal morbidities for each week of gestation between 29 and 33 weeks using multiple logistic regression models for the primary outcome and for the secondary outcomes that showed significant statistical interaction between GA and ANS. All reported p values are two-sided and p values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS/STAT software, Version 9.4, Cary, NC.
Results
Of the 7,157 infants enrolled in the Moderate Preterm Registry, 6,419 (91%) were inborn and 638 (9%) were out-born. Among inborn infants, 5,916 infants did not have congenital anomalies. Of these 5,916 infants, data on ANS exposure were available for 5,886 infants categorized as no ANS (n = 676), partial ANS (n = 1,225), and complete ANS (n = 3,985) groups. Betamethasone was the primary ANS in the study cohort, with only 55 participants receiving dexamethasone prior to delivery.
Maternal and infant characteristics of subjects exposed to no, partial, and complete ANS are described in Table 1. The no and partial ANS groups had higher GA (31.8 ± 1.4 and 31.6 ± 1.4 vs. 31.4 ± 1.4 weeks, p < 0.001) and lower rates of SGA (13.6 and 13.2% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.0001) and histological chorioamnionitis (19.9 and 21.2% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.0001) compared with the complete ANS group. Significant differences were also noted among no, partial, and complete ANS groups for maternal marital status, education, Medicaid insurance, hypertension, clinical chorioamnionitis, delivery mode, birth weight, and incidence of singleton versus multiple births.
Table 1.
Maternal and neonatal characteristics by exposure to antenatal steroids
| Variablea mean ± SD or n (%)a | No ANS, n = 676 | Partial ANS, n = 1225 | Complete ANS, n = 3985 | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Married maternal status | 292/676 (43.2) | 548/1224 (44.8) | 1914/3983 (48.1%) | 0.0177 |
| Maternal education (>high school) | 362/509 (71.1) | 683/900 (75.9) | 2409/2938 (82.0) | <0.0001 |
| Maternal hypertension | 123/675 (18.2) | 260/1225 (21.2) | 1028/3983 (25.8) | <0.0001 |
| Clinical chorioamnionitis | 27/676 (4.0) | 60/1225 (4.9) | 357/3983 (9.0) | <0.0001 |
| Histologic chorioamnionitisb | 115/579 (19.9) | 230/1086 (21.2) | 1002/3572 (28.1) | <0.0001 |
| Rupture of membrane > 18 hours | 74/646 (11.5) | 118/1173 (10.1) | 936/3765 (24.9) | <0.0001 |
| Mode of delivery (cesarean section) | 427/676 (63.2) | 727/1225 (59.3) | 2551/3981 (64.1) | 0.0111 |
| Multiple births | 165/676 (24.4) | 351/1225 (28.7) | 1301/3985 (32.6) | <0.0001 |
| Race | ||||
| White | 348/640 (54.4) | 663/1166 (56.9) | 2228/3810 (58.5) | 0.1239 |
| Black | 244/640 (38.1) | 426/1166 (36.5) | 1313/3810 (34.5) | 0.1233 |
| Others | 48/640 (7.5) | 77/1166 (6.6) | 269/3810 (7.1) | 0.7615 |
| Males | 373/676 (55.2) | 620/1225 (50.6) | 2038/3982 (51.2) | 0.1219 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 31.8 1.4 | 31.6 1.4 | 31.4 1.4 | <0.0001 |
| Birth weight (grams) | 1790.1 408.5 | 1739.0 402.3 | 1661.5 411.2 | <0.0001 |
| SGA | 92/676 (13.6) | 162/1225 (13.2) | 707/3980 (17.8) | 0.0001 |
| Medicaid insurance | 432/672 (64.3) | 700/1222 (57.3) | 2139/3982 (53.7) | <0.0001 |
Denominator for each variable is based on availability of data.
Among infants for whom data are available.
Neonatal morbidities and mortality among the three groups of infants are shown in Table 2. Among the no, partial, and complete ANS groups, respectively, there were significant differences in DR resuscitation (4.1, 1.4, and 1.2%), surfactant-treated respiratory disease (26.5, 26.3, and 20%), severe ICH (3, 2, and 0.8%), and PDA (9.3, 8.2, and 6.6%). Infants exposed to a complete ANS course had lowest rates of DR resuscitation, surfactant-treated respiratory disease, severe ICH, and PDA. Multivariable analysis revealed that a complete ANS course was associated with lower surfactant-treated respiratory disease, compared with a partial ANS course (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.52–0.74), and no ANS (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.41–0.66). Male gender was associated with an increase in surfactant-treated respiratory disease (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.21–1.62), whereas SGA status (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63–0.96), histologic chorioamnionitis (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.41–0.59), Medicaid insurance (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.72–0.99), and an increase of 1 week of gestation (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.52–0.58) were associated with a lower risk of surfactant-treated respiratory disease (Fig. 1). Even a partial course of ANS was associated with lower DR resuscitation, mortality, and any ICH, but no difference in surfactant-treated respiratory disease, when compared with no ANS exposure.
Table 2.
Neonatal morbidities among moderately preterm infants by exposure to antenatal steroids
| Variable, mean ± SD, or n (%) | No ANS, n = 676 | Partial ANS, n = 1,225 | Complete ANS, n = 3,985 | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) or estimate (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partial versus no | Complete versus no | Complete versus partial | ||||
| DR intubationc | 131/676 (19.4) | 200/1225 (16.3) | 446/3983 (11.2) | 0.74 (0.55–1.01) | 0.46 (0.35–0.60) | 0.62 (0.50–0.76) |
| Advanced DR Resuscitationa,c | 28/676 (4.1) | 17/1225 (1.4) | 47/3982 (1.2) | 0.40 (0.20–0.77) | 0.27 (0.16–0.48) | 0.69 (0.38–1.25) |
| Mortalityc | 11/676 (1.6) | 7/1225 (0.6) | 43/3985 (1.1) | 0.25 (0.08–0.73) | 0.58 (0.28–1.18) | 2.32 (0.91–5.92) |
| Surfactant-treated respiratory diseasec | 179/675 (26.5) | 322/1225 (26.3) | 795/3984 (20.0) | 0.84 (0.64–1.1) | 0.52 (0.41–0.66) | 0.62 (0.52–0.74) |
| Severe ICHb,c | 10/328 (3.0) | 13/652 (2.0) | 18/2268 (0.8) | 0.74 (0.28–1.95) | 0.33 (0.13–0.81) | 0.44 (0.21–0.95) |
| Any ICHc | 55/328 (16.8) | 76/652 (11.7) | 295/2268 (13.0) | 0.60 (0.38–0.93) | 0.64 (0.44–0.94) | 1.07 (0.80–1.44) |
| Oxygen use at 28 daysc | 39/643 (6.1) | 77/1180 (6.5) | 310/3816 (8.1) | 0.96 (0.58–1.60) | 1.21 (0.77–1.91) | 1.26 (0.92–1.73) |
| Patent ductus arteriosusb,c | 63/675 (9.3) | 100/1224 (8.2) | 262/3984 (6.6) | 0.82 (0.56–1.21) | 0.60 (0.43–0.85) | 0.73 (0.56–0.96) |
| Necrotizing enterocolitisb,c | 16/674 (2.4) | 24/1225 (2.0) | 92/3983 (2.3) | 0.81 (0.40–1.64) | 0.87 (0.47–1.59) | 1.07 (0.66–1.73) |
| Early onset sepsisb,d | 3/675 (0.4) | 6/1225 (0.5) | 25/3984 (0.6) | |||
| Late onset sepsisb,c | 14/675 (2.1) | 36/1222 (2.9) | 105/3975 (2.6) | 1.44 (0.71–2.93) | 1.16 (0.61–2.22) | 0.81 (0.53–1.23) |
| Hospital length of staye | 30.7 ± 21.0 Median 27.0 | 31.6 ± 19.1 Median 29.0 | 32.9 ± 17.6 Median 31.0 | 0.50 (–0.90,1.90) | −0.03 (−1.06,1.01) | −0.53 (−2.09,1.04) |
| Postmenstrual age at hospital discharge (weeks)e | 36.7 ± 2.6 Median 36.4 | 36.6 ± 2.2 Median 36.3 | 36.6 ± 1.9 Median 36.3 | 0.07 (−0.12,0.27) | 0.00 (−0.15,0.15) | −0.07 (−0.30,0.15) |
Abbreviations: ANS, antenatal corticosteroids; CI, confidence interval; DR, delivery room; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; SD, standard deviation.
Chest compression and/or epinephrine.
Not controlled for center due to small numbers.
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI).
Adjusted analysis not performed due to small sample size.
Adjusted estimate (95% CI).
Fig. 1.

Factors associated with surfactant-treated respiratory disease.
We evaluated the association between ANS and neonatal morbidities for each week of GA (29–33 weeks) using multiple logistic regression models for the primary outcome (surfactant-treated respiratory disease). Although the interaction between GA and ANS was not statistically significant for the overall model for the primary outcome ([surfactant-treated respiratory disease]; p = 0.2017, we performed the per week analysis because it was preplanned. We also performed the per week analysis for DR intubation, because this outcome was noted to have significant interaction between GA and ANS (p = 0.0095). We noted persistence of this beneficial association from 29 to 33 weeks’ GA; the lowest rates of surfactant-treated respiratory disease and DR intubation were associated with exposure to a complete course of ANS (Table 3).
Table 3.
Surfactant-treated RD and DR intubation with exposure to antenatal steroids per week of gestation
| Gestational age (weeks) | No ANS, n (%) | Partial ANS, n (%) | Complete ANS, n (%) | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partial versus no | Complete versus no | Complete versus partial | ||||
| 29 weeks: Surfactant for RD | 31/60 (51.7) | 79/144 (54.9) | 195/458 (42.6) | 1.37 (0.63–2.98) | 0.74 (0.35–1.57) | 0.54 (0.34–0.86) |
| 29 weeks: DR intubation | 28/60 (46.7) | 54/144 (37.5) | 119/458 (26.0) | 1.28 (0.56–2.91) | 0.61 (0.28–1.34) | 0.48 (0.29–0.78) |
| 30 weeks: Surfactant for RD | 37/70 (52.9) | 66/159 (41.5) | 193/651 (29.6) | 0.77 (0.39–1.51) | 0.39 (0.21–0.72) | 0.51 (0.33–0.77) |
| 30 weeks: DR intubation | 26/70 (37.1) | 54/159 (34) | 100/650 (15.4) | 1.00 (0.49–2.03) | 0.30 (0.16–0.58) | 0.30 (0.19–0.47) |
| 31 weeks: Surfactant for RD | 26/89 (29.2) | 76/216 (35.2%) | 172/744 (23.1) | 1.15 (0.62–2.14) | 0.75 (0.43–1.31) | 0.65 (0.44–0.95) |
| 31 weeks: DR intubation | 18/90 (20.0) | 35/216 (16.2) | 100/744 (13.4) | 0.56 (0.26–1.20) | 0.62 (0.32–1.21) | 1.11 (0.66–1.85) |
| 32 weeks: Surfactant for RD | 34/168 (20.2) | 50/270 (18.5) | 152/983 (15.5) | 0.78 (0.43–1.40) | 0.61 (0.37–1.02) | 0.78 (0.52–1.18) |
| 32 weeks: DR intubation | 30/168 (17.9) | 33/270 (12.2) | 75/983 (7.6) | 0.55 (0.29–1.08) | 0.37 (0.21–0.64) | 0.66 (0.39–1.11) |
| 33 weeks: Surfactant for RD | 50/287 (17.4) | 51/436 (11.7) | 82/1147 (7.1) | 0.61 (0.36–1.04) | 0.35 (0.21–0.58) | 0.57 (0.38–0.88) |
| 33 weeks: DR intubation | 29/287 (10.1) | 24/436 (5.5) | 52/1147 (4.5) | 0.47 (0.25–0.91) | 0.46 (0.27–0.79) | 0.97 (0.55–1.70) |
Abbreviations: ANS, antenatal corticosteroids; CI, confidence interval; DR, delivery room; RD, respiratory disease.
Discussion
In this large multicenter cohort study of MPT infants, complete, partial, and no ANS were associated with significant differences in rates of neonatal morbidities. Among MPT infants, any ANS exposure was associated with lower DR resuscitation, DR endotracheal intubation, surfactant-treated respiratory disease, any ICH, severe ICH, and PDA. Infants exposed to a complete ANS course had the lowest risk of these morbidities. However, even a partial course of ANS was associated with lower DR resuscitation, mortality, and any ICH, compared with no ANS exposure. ANS exposure was not associated with oxygen use at 28 days.
Previous studies of ANS have evaluated outcomes of preterm infants with a wide range of maturity ranging from 24 to 34 weeks’ GA as a collective cohort. Outcomes of MPT infants born with differential exposure to ANS have not been reported previously. Pattinson et al performed a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (dexamethasone or placebo) in South Africa, which included women with preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28 to 34 weeks’ GA, 102 of whom (105 neonates) were in the dexamethasone group and 102 (103 neonates) in the placebo group. A trend toward fewer perinatal deaths was noted for the dexamethasone group (4 vs. 10 deaths in the dexamethasone and placebo group; p = 0.16, OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.09–1.34). A significant reduction in perinatal death was noted in a subgroup analysis of mothers who delivered beyond 24 hours of admission (1 vs. 7 deaths in dexamethasone and placebo group; p = 0.047).17 Travers and colleagues evaluated outcomes of preterm infants born with and without exposure to ANS by GA at birth in a large, prospective, multicenter study (n = 117,941, GA 230/7–346/7 weeks).18 They noted a lower rate of early mechanical ventilation among infants born after exposure to any ANS, compared with those born without any exposure to ANS at each GA from 25 to 34 weeks. Data on whether the course of ANS was complete or incomplete was not available in this study.
MPT infants have been noted to be at risk of a range of respiratory problems, including transient tachypnea of newborn, apnea, respiratory distress, and hypoxemic respiratory failure.6,19 There has been variation in the definition for RDS in previous studies. We chose an objective and clinically meaningful criterion (surfactant-treated respiratory disease) as a criterion for lung maturity. Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation may be associated with many complications in preterm infants including pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia.20,21 The primary outcome of surfactant-treated respiratory disease was significantly lower in the complete ANS group, compared with no and partial ANS groups. Recent studies have noted lower incidence and severity of RDS with histologic chorioamnionitis.22 We noted a higher rate of histologic chorioamnionitis in the complete ANS group, compared with the no and partial ANS groups. However, exposure to a complete course of ANS remained independently associated with a lower rate of surfactant-treated respiratory disease, even after controlling for histologic chorioamnionitis.
We noted significant reductions in several neonatal morbidities (endotracheal intubation and resuscitation in the DR, ICH, and PDA) after ANS exposure. We found a significantly lower rate of severe ICH in the complete ANS group, compared with no and partial ANS group, although the proportions of infants undergoing imaging ranged from 49 to 57% in the three groups. Using data from the same NICHD NRN Moderate Preterm Registry, ANS administration has been previously shown to be associated with a reduction in abnormal cranial imaging.23 Lack of a significant difference in the administration of oxygen at 28 days in the three groups could possibly be due to lack of power to assess this outcome, which is relatively uncommon among MPT infants.
A recent randomized controlled trial by Gyamfi-Bannerman et al conducted at 17 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network evaluated the role of ANS administration to pregnant womenat risk of “late preterm delivery (340/7–365/7 weeks’ gestation) on neonatal respiratory morbidities.”24 The primary outcome was a composite of treatment in the first 72 hours of age (use of continuous positive airway pressure or high flow nasal cannula for at least 2 hours, supplemental oxygen with a fraction of inspired oxygen of at least 0.30 for at least 4 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mechanical ventilation). The primary outcome occurred in 165 of 1427 neonates (11.6%) in the ANS group and 202 of 1400 (14.4%) neonates in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.80; 95% CI 0.66–0.97; p = 0.02). This study did not provide details on the differential exposure to ANS (no, partial, and complete course of ANS) on neonatal outcomes. Hypoglycemia in neonates was more common in the ANS group than in the placebo group (24 vs. 15%; p < 0.001).24 We noted a persistence of the association between a complete course of ANS and lower surfactant-treated respiratory disease and lower DR intubation across nearly all weeks of gestation (29–33 weeks), with notrend for the reduction in thebeneficial effect of ANS with an increasing GA. The current study reports the effects of ANS exposure for neonates that delivered at MPT gestation. Some neonates exposed to ANS during MPT gestation may be born at a later GA. It is possible that the beneficial and adverse effects of ANS exposure may be different for neonates delivering at more mature GA, as compared to neonates born at MPT gestation.
MPT infants represent a significant proportion of preterm infants. Moreover, these infants incur significant short- and long-term morbidities and have considerable societal and financial impact on the health care system.25 Several large population-based cohort studies from Sweden and Norway have noted that MPT infants (29–32 weeks’ GA) have a significantly higher risk of disability and need for long-term assistance as compared with infants born at term gestation, and these studies found that most children and adults with special needs were born MPT.26,27 Our data suggest that a complete course of ANS is associated with lower neonatal morbidities including surfactant-treated respiratory disease, DR resuscitation, and ICH. Preventing these complications may, in turn, result in fewer childhood and adult disabilities.
The limitations of our study include its observational design, which permits only the identification of associations between neonatal morbidities and differential exposure to ANS and does not demonstrate causal relationships. Patients were born at the participating academic centers of the NRN, and may not be representative of the entire population. Infants born prior to receipt of a complete course of ANS might have different baseline characteristics, which could potentially be confounding factors for the differences in their outcomes. Significant differences were noted among no, partial, and complete ANS groups in GA, SGA status, histologic chorioamnionitis, maternal marital status, education, Medicaid insurance, hypertension, delivery mode, birth weight, and singleton versus multiple births. We controlled for many potential factors, however, that have been previously reported to influence neonatal morbidities, including GA, SGA status, chorioamnionitis, gender, race, health insurance, and center. We also included all eligible inborn MPT infants, born at 290/7–336/7 weeks’ GA delivered at participating NRN centers in a defined time frame. We were not able to evaluate the impact of the duration between administration of the first dose of ANS and delivery due to lack of data regarding timing of administration of ANS. Another drawback is that cranial imaging in the MPT population was not consistent and was performed in only 60% of infants. The primary outcome (surfactant-treated respiratory disease) was pragmatic and may be clinician and center dependent. Adjustment was made for the center of birth.
The strengths of our study include (1) recent, large multicenter cohort of infants; (2) use of prespecified definitions for all outcomes; and (3) prospective collection of data by trained and experienced research staff. In addition, the size of our cohort allowed us to evaluate the association of ANS with neonatal morbidities by week of GA. The study participants were from centers across the United States, with different race and socioeconomic strata, which increases the generalizability of this study. We evaluated the association of ANS exposure (no, partial, complete course) as a trichotomized variable and noted maximum benefits associated with a complete course of ANS among this MPT cohort. A dose-dependent association of ANS exposure on the outcome provides strong evidence for the benefits of ANS for MPT infants. Our group recently noted differential benefits of ANS as a trichotomized variable (no/partial/complete course of ANS) on survival, neonatal morbidities, as well as neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months of age among extremely preterm infants, with maximum benefits noted for the complete ANS group.28 The findings of the current study may have implications for the design of trials to evaluate outcomes of MPT infants, which should take into account the differential associations of neonatal morbidities with no, partial, and complete courses of ANS. Lower neonatal morbidities associated even with a partial course of ANS in this study support the prompt administration of ANS even in situations when likelihood of receiving a complete ANS course appears low due to insufficient time.
Conclusion
In this large multicenter prospective data registry of MPT infants, ANS were associated with lower resuscitation and endotracheal intubation in the DR, surfactant-treated respiratory disease, and severe ICH with the lowest frequency of morbidities associated with a complete course. The associations between ANS and lower surfactant-treated respiratory disease, as well as intubation in the DR, persist from 29 to 33 weeks’ GA. These results support recommendations to administer ANS prior to MPT birth.
Acknowledgments
The National Institutes of Health, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences provided grant support for the Neonatal Research Network’s Moderate Preterm Registry through cooperative agreements. While NICHD staff did have input into the study design, conduct, analysis, and manuscript drafting, the content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Participating NRN sites collected data and transmitted it to RTI International, the data coordinating center (DCC) for the network, which stored, managed, and analyzed the data for this study. One behalf of the NRN, Dr. Abhik Das (DCC Principal Investigator) and Mr. Dhuly Chowdhury (DCC Statistician) had full access to all of the data in the study, and with the NRN Center Principal Investigators, take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.
We are indebted to our medical and nursing colleagues and the infants and their parents who agreed to take part in this study. The following investigators, in addition to those listed as authors, participated in this study:
NRN Steering Committee Chair: Richard A. Polin, MD, Division of Neonatology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, (2011-present).
Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (U10 HD27904)— Martin Keszler, MD; Betty R. Vohr, MD; Angelita M. Hensman, MS RNC-NIC BSN; Elisa Vieira, RN BSN.
Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies & Children’s Hospital (U10HD21364, M01RR80)—Anna Marie Hibbs, MD; Nancy S. Newman, RN; Bonnie S. Siner, RN.
Children’s Mercy Hospital (U10 HD68284)—William E. Truog, MD; Eugenia K. Pallotto, MD MSCE; Howard W. Kilbride MD; Cheri Gauldin, RN MSN CCRC; Anne Holmes RN MSN MBA-HCM CCRC; Kathy Johnson RN, CCRC.
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, and Good Samaritan Hospital (U10 HD27853, UL1 TR77)—Brenda B. Poindexter, MD MS; Kurt Schibler, MD; Suhas G. Kallapur, MD; Cathy Grisby, BSN CCRC; Barbara Alexander, RN; Estelle E. Fischer, MHSA MBA; Lenora Jackson, CRC; Kristin Kirker, CRC ; Jennifer Jennings, RN BSN; Sandra Wuertz, RN BSN CLC; Greg Muthig, BA.
Duke University School of Medicine, University Hospital, University of North Carolina, and Duke Regional Hospital (U10 HD40492, UL1 TR1117, UL1 TR1111)—C. Michael Cotten, MD MHS; Ronald N. Goldberg, MD; Joanne Finkle, RN JD; Kimberley A. Fisher, PhD FNP-BC IBCLC; Matthew M. Laughon, MD MPH; Carl L. Bose, MD; Janice Bernhardt, MS RN; Cindy Clark, RN.
Emory University, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Grady Memorial Hospital, and Emory University Hospital Midtown (U10 HD27851, UL1 TR454)—David P. Carlton, MD; Ellen C. Hale, BS RN CCRC; Yvonne Loggins, RN; Diane I. Bottcher, RN MSN.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development—Rosemary D. Higgins, MD; Stephanie Wilson Archer, MA.
Indiana University, University Hospital, Methodist Hospital, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, and Eskenazi Health (U10 HD27856, UL1 TR6)— Greg Sokol, MD; Dianne E. Herron, RN.
Nationwide Children’s Hospital and the Ohio State University Medical Center (U10 HD68278)—Pablo J. Sanchez, MD; Leif D. Nelin, MD; Sudarshan R. Jadcherla, MD; Patricia Luzader, RN; Nehal A. Parikh, DO MS; Marliese Dion Nist, BSN; Jennifer Fuller, MS RNC; Julie Gutentag, BSN; Marissa E. Jones, RN MBA; Sarah McGregor, BSN RNC; Elizabeth Rodgers, BSN; Jodi A. Ulloa, MSN APRN NNP-BC; Tara Wolfe, BSN.
RTI International (U10 HD36790)—Dennis Wallace, PhD; Kristin M. Zaterka-Baxter, RN BSN CCRP; Margaret Crawford, BS CCRP; Jenna Gabrio, BS CCRP; Jeanette O’Donnell Auman, BS.
Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital (U10 HD27880, UL1 TR93)—David K. Stevenson, MD; M. Bethany Ball, BS CCRC; Melinda S. Proud, RCP.
University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System and Children’s Hospital of Alabama (U10 HD34216)— Waldemar A. Carlo, MD; Namasivayam Ambalavanan, MD; Monica V. Collins, RN BSN MaEd; Shirley S. Cosby, RN BSN.
University of California—Los Angeles, Mattel Children’s Hospital, Santa Monica Hospital, Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center, and Olive View Medical Center (U10 HD68270)—Uday Devaskar, MD; Meena Garg, MD; Teresa Chanlaw, MPH; Rachel Geller, RN BSN.
University of Iowa and Mercy Medical Center (U10 HD53109, UL1 TR442)—Tarah T. Colaizy, MD MPH; Dan L. Ellsbury, MD; Jane E. Brumbaugh, MD; Karen J. Johnson, RN BSN; Donia B. Campbell, RNC-NIC; Jacky R. Walker, RN.
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (U10 HD53089, UL1 TR41)—Kristi L. Watterberg, MD; Robin K. Ohls, MD; Conra Backstrom Lacy, RN; Sandy Sundquist Beauman, MSN,RNC-NIC; Carol Hartenberger, MPH, RN CCRC.
University of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (U10 HD68244)—Barbara Schmidt, MD; Haresh Kirpalani, MB MSc; Noah Cook, MD; Sara B. DeMauro, MD MSCE; Aasma S. Chaudhary, BS RRT; Soraya Abbasi, MD; Toni Mancini, RN BSN CCRC; Dara Cucinotta.
University of Rochester Medical Center, Golisano Children’s Hospital, and the University of Buffalo Women’s and Children’s Hospital of Buffalo (U10 HD68263, UL1 TR42)—Satyan Lakshminrusimha, MD; Ronnie Guillet, MD PhD; Ann Marie Scorsone, MS; Julianne Hunn, BS; Rosemary Jensen; Holly I.M. Wadkins, MA; Stephanie Guilford, BS; Ashley Williams, M.S. Ed.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Parkland Health & Hospital System, and Children’s Medical Center Dallas (U10 HD40689)—Myra Wyckoff, MD; Luc P. Brion, MD; Diana M. Vasil, RNC-NIC; Lijun Chen, PhD RN; Lizette E. Torres, RN.
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School and Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital (U10 HD21373)—Kathleen A. Kennedy, MD MPH; Jon E. Tyson, MD MPH; Barbara J. Stoll, MD; Julie Arldt-McAlister, RN BSN; Carmen Garcia, RN CCRP; Karen Martin, RN; Georgia E. McDavid, RN; Sharon L. Wright, MT (ASCP).
Wayne State University, University of Michigan, Hutzel Women’s Hospital, and Children’s Hospital of Michigan (U10 HD21385)—Athina Pappas, MD; John Barks, MD; Rebecca Bara, RN BSN; Shelley Handel, AD; Diane F White, RT; Mary Christensen, RT; Stephanie A. Wiggins, MS.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions
Sanjay Chawla: Conceptualized the study, developed the protocol, created data collection form, reviewed analysis, and drafted first version of the manuscript.
Girija Natarajan: Contributed significantly in the development of the study protocol, participated in analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Dhuly Chowdhury: Critically reviewed the protocol, participated in the development of data collection tools, conducted the initial data analysis, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Abhik Das: Critically reviewed the protocol, supervised the analysis, reviewed, and revised the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript
Michele Walsh: Contributed significantly in the development of the study protocol, participated in the development of data collection tools, participated in analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Edward F. Bell: Contributed significantly in the development of the study protocol, participated in the development of data collection tools, participated in analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Abbot R. Laptook: Contributed significantly in the development of the study protocol, participated in the development of data collection tools, participated in analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Krisa Van Meurs: Contributed significantly in the development of the study protocol, participated in the development of data collection tools, participated in analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Carl T. D’Angio: Contributed significantly in development of the study protocol, participated in development of data collection tools, participated in analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Barbara J. Stoll: Contributed significantly in the development of the study protocol, participated in the development of data collection tools, participated in analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Sara B. DeMauro: Contributed significantly in the development of the study protocol, participated in the development of data collection tools, participated in analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Seetha Shankaran: Contributed significantly in the development of the study protocol, participated in the development of data collection tools, participated in analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- 1.Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final data for 2014. National vital statistics reports: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics System. 2015;64(12):1–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guy A, Seaton SE, Boyle EM, et al. Infants born late/moderately preterm are at increased risk for a positive autism screen at 2 years of age. J Pediatr. 2015;166(02):269–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.10.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Johnson S, Evans TA, Draper ES, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following late and moderate prematurity: a population-based cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(04):F301–F308. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McGowan JE, Alderdice FA, Holmes VA, Johnston L. Early childhood development of late-preterm infants: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2011;127(06):1111–1124. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Natarajan G, Shankaran S. Short- and long-term outcomes of moderate and late preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(03):305–317. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1571150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boyle EM, Johnson S, Manktelow B, et al. Neonatal outcomes and delivery of care for infants born late preterm or moderately preterm: a prospective population-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(06):F479–F485. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Effect of corticosteroids for fetal maturation on perinatal outcomes. NIH Consens Statement. 1994;12(02):1–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crowley P, Chalmers I, Keirse MJ. The effects of corticosteroid administration before preterm delivery: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(01):11–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb01711.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liggins GC, Howie RN. A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics. 1972;50(04):515–525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Roberts D, Dalziel S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3(03):CD004454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kari MA, Hallman M, Eronen M, et al. Prenatal dexamethasone treatment in conjunction with rescue therapy of human surfactant: a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study. Pediatrics. 1994;93(05):730–736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Doran TA, Swyer P, MacMurray B, et al. Results of a double-blind controlled study on the use of betamethasone in the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136(03):313–320. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90855-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Walsh MC, Bell EF, Kandefer S, et al. Neonatal outcomes of moderately preterm infants compared to extremely preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2017;82(02):297–304. doi: 10.1038/pr.2017.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978;92(04):529–534. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg. 1978;187(01):1–7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197801000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(02):163–168. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pattinson RC, Makin JD, Funk M, et al. Dexiprom Study Group The use of dexamethasone in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes–a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. S Afr Med J. 1999;89(08):865–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Travers CP, Clark RH, Spitzer AR, et al. Exposure to any antenatal corticosteroids and outcomes in preterm infants by gestational age: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2017;356:j1039. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Altman M, Vanpée M, Cnattingius S, Norman M. Neonatal morbidity in moderately preterm infants: a Swedish national population-based study. J Pediatr. 2011;158(02):239–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.07.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bancalari E, Gerhardt T. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986;33(01):1–23. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)34967-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Strong RM, Passy V. Endotracheal intubation. Complications in neonates. Arch Otolaryngol. 1977;103(06):329–335. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1977.00780230051006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rocha G. Chorioamnionitis and lung injury in preterm newborns. Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:890987. doi: 10.1155/2013/890987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Natarajan G, Shankaran S, Saha S, Laptook A, Walsh M, Das A, Higgins R. Abnormal cranial imaging in moderately preterm infants in NICU. Pediatric Academic Society; 2015. p. 268. (San Diego Publication 4141.301). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Thom EA, Blackwell SC, et al. NICHD Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk for late preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1311–1320. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1516783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Khan KA, Petrou S, Dritsaki M, et al. Economic costs associated with moderate and late preterm birth: a prospective population-based study. BJOG. 2015;122(11):1495–1505. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lindström K, Winbladh B, Haglund B, Hjern A. Preterm infants as young adults: a Swedish national cohort study. Pediatrics. 2007;120(01):70–77. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moster D, Lie RT, Markestad T. Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(03):262–273. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chawla S, Natarajan G, Shankaran S, et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network Association of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes and Neonatal Morbidities of Extremely Premature Infants With Differential Exposure to Antenatal Steroids. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(12):1164–1172. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
