Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2018 Sep 19;9:1314. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01314

FasL Modulates Expression of Mmp2 in Osteoblasts

Eva Svandova 1,2,*,†, Barbora Vesela 1,2,†, Hervé Lesot 2, Jeremy Sadoine 3, Anne Poliard 3, Eva Matalova 1,2
PMCID: PMC6157335  PMID: 30283358

Abstract

FasL is a well-known actor in the apoptotic pathways but recent reports have pointed to its important novel roles beyond cell death, as observed also for bone cells. This is supported by non-apoptotic appearance of FasL during osteogenesis and by significant bone alterations unrelated to apoptosis in FasL deficient (gld) mice. The molecular mechanism behind this novel role has not yet been revealed. In this report, intramembranous bone, where osteoblasts differentiate directly from mesenchymal precursors without intermediary chondrogenic step, was investigated. Mouse mandibular bone surrounding the first lower molar was used as a model. The stage where a complex set of bone cells (osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoclasts) is first present during development was selected for an initial examination. Immunohistochemical staining detected FasL in non-apoptotic cells at this stage. Further, FasL deficient vs. wild type samples subjected to osteogenic PCR Array analysis displayed a significantly decreased expression of Mmp2 in gld bone. To examine the possibility of this novel FasL–Mmp2 relationship, intramembranous bone-derived osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1) were treated with anti-FasL antibody or rmFasL. Indeed, the FasL neutralization caused a decreased expression of Mmp2 and rmFasL added to the cells resulted in the opposite effect. Since Mmp2-/- mice display age-dependent alterations in the intramembranous bone, early stages of gld mandibular bone were examined and age-dependent phenotype was confirmed also in gld mice. Taken together, the present in vivo and in vitro findings point to a new non-apoptotic function of FasL in bone development associated with Mmp2 expression.

Keywords: osteogenesis, intramembranous bone, Fas ligand, non-apoptotic, Mmp2

Introduction

FasL (CD178; CD95L; APO1L and TNF ligand superfamily member 6) belongs to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family and interacts with Fas (CD95; APO-1; TNFRSF6) receptor (Suda et al., 1993). The Fas/FasL pathway is a well-known regulator of apoptotic cell death, particularly in the immune system (Suda et al., 1993; Griffith et al., 1995; Tsutsui et al., 1996). However, recent evidences have also suggested important non-apoptotic functions of FasL, beyond the immune system, such as in cell proliferation, differentiation or survival, as for instance in bones (Josefsen et al., 1999; Kovacic et al., 2007; Rippo et al., 2013).

Bone development proceeds through an intramembranous or endochondral ossification process. Ossification in the former is direct, while, in the latter, a step of cartilaginous differentiation takes place (Franz-Odendaal, 2011). The involvement of FasL in osteogenesis was suggested from the knock-out bone phenotype in FasL deficient (gld) adult mice, which display an increased bone mineral density (BMD) in endochondral (long) bones (Katavic et al., 2003). This has made of FasL a potential target for the treatment of osteoporosis (Park et al., 2005; Nakamura et al., 2007; Kovacic et al., 2010).

In the context of bone formation and homeostasis, Fas/FasL system has been so far connected with osteoblast apoptosis of human biopsies (Kawakami et al., 1997), osteoblasts-induced osteoclast apoptosis in cells derived from long bones (Wang et al., 2015) and was reported along with other apoptosis-associated factors in the human mandible (Hatakeyama et al., 2000). Regarding non-apoptotic functions of FasL in osteogenesis, the Fas/FasL system was shown to influence in vitro differentiation of murine endochondral bone derived cells but the mechanism remains unclear (Kovacic et al., 2007).

This work aimed to investigate molecular mechanism(s) behind non-apoptotic osteogenic functions of FasL during intramembranous osteogenesis, where data are lacking. For this purpose, the mandibular bone adjacent to the first molar was selected as a model. Immunohistochemistry, PCR Array-based screening and FasL deficient vs. wild type mouse bone examination were performed in vivo. These analytical approaches were completed by in vitro functional tests using a cell line to demonstrate a new relation between FasL and Mmp2 in osteoblasts.

Materials and Methods

Biological Material

Mice (Mus musculus) of the ICR strain were studied at embryonic (E) stages (E13, E15). The FasL-deficient mice (gld) strain: B6Smn.C3-Faslgld/J and the corresponding controls (C57BL/6J) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Maine, United States) and staged (E15 and P24). Mice were kept in the animal facilities of the Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Czech Republic and Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université Paris Descartes, France. The experimental protocol is part of the project GACR 16-18430S and runs under Animal Care Ethics Committee of Université Paris Descartes in France. A cell line of osteoblastic precursors, MC3T3-E1, was purchased from the European Collection of Cell Culture (c.n. 99072810).

Histological Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Immunofluorescence

Mouse heads were fixed in 4% PFA 24 h. Further, samples were dehydrated in alcohol series, treated with xylene and embedded in paraffin. Histological sections of mandibles (5 μm) were then prepared. Morphological criteria were analyzed by trichrome, haematoxylin-eosin staining or TRAP analysis as was used in Svandova et al. (2018).

For immunohistochemical detection, antigen retrieval was carried out in citrate buffer (pH = 6.0) for 5 min at 98°C in case of osteocalcin. The following primary antibodies were applied: FasL (FasL/N-20, sc-834, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, United States), osteocalcin (Rb pAb to Osteocalcin, ab93876, Abcam, United Kingdom). The primary antibodies were diluted 1:50 (FasL) and 1:100 (Osteocalcin) and applied overnight at 4°C. Peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin-biotin system (Vectastain, United States) and chromogen substrate diaminobenzidine (DAB, K3466; Dako, United States) reactions were used to visualize the positive cells as brown. Slides were counterstained with haematoxylin.

Immunofluorescent analysis of Sost, Mmp2 and FasL expression was applied for mandibles and MC3T3-E1. For Sost and Mmp2, retrieval of antigens was performed. The following primary antibodies were applied: Sost (Mouse Sost/Sclerostin Antibody, AF1589, R&D Systems, United States), Mmp2 (Mmp2/H-76, sc-10736, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, United States) and FasL (described above). Antibodies were diluted 1:50 (Mmp2 and FasL) or 1:100 (Sost) and applied overnight at 4°C. Then Alexa Fluor® 488 (Thermo Fischer Scientific, United States) or Alexa Fluor® 594 (Abcam, United Kingdom) were used (1:200) for 40 min at RT.

Cytoskeleton was visualized by ActinGreenTM 488 ReadyProbesTM Reagent (Thermo Fischer Scientific, United States), nuclei were detected by ProLong® Gold Antifade reagent with DAPI (Thermo Fischer Scientific, United States).

TUNEL Assay

Histological sections were rehydrated. Samples were pre-treated with 20 mg/ml proteinase K for 15 min at RT. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubating with 3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS for 5 min at RT. The reaction mixture (TUNEL, S7100; Millipore, United States) consisting of 1 μl TdT enzyme: 14 μl distilled water: 35 μl reaction buffer, was prepared and samples were incubated for 45 min at 37°C. Anti-digoxigenin-peroxidase reaction was applied for 30 min at RT. Positive cells were finally visualized by DAB. Samples were counterstained with haematoxylin.

Analysis of Osteoclast Number and Bone Area

Six samples (three gld mice and three wild-type mice, prenatal stage 15) were used for the analysis. The bone surrounding the first molar was investigated to preserve homogeneity of the selected bone region. Five series of four slides (four histological sections per one slide) were prepared for each sample. The first slide of each series was used for morphological observation (haematoxylin-eosin staining), the second for detection of osteoclasts (TRAP), the third for bone matrix visualization (trichrome staining) and the fourth for apoptosis detection (TUNEL). One section per slide was evaluated to avoid multiple counting.

For the osteoclasts analysis, TRAP-positive cells were counted using Fiji application (ImageJ)1 in the left and right quadrants of the mandibular bone. Ten values were obtained for each animal to determine the total number of osteoclasts in the region.

The bone matrix area was measured in the trichrome-stained slides. Again 10 values were used to calculate the total area for each specimen. The region of the mandibular bone was expressed in pixels using Adobe Photoshop 6 (Adobe Systems) and recalculated into square micrometers. The average (avg) and standard deviation (SD) was counted for both groups (gld and wild type) and statistical significance was determined (Student’s t-test, p ≤ 0.05).

Micro Computed Tomography (MicroCT)

Specimens were scanned using a Quantum FX Caliper device (Life Sciences, Perkin Elmer, United States). The skeleton was acquired using an X-ray tube voltage of 90 kV and a tube current of 160 μA with a field of view 10 × 10 mm. Full 3D high-resolution raw data were obtained by rotating both the X-ray source and the at panel detector 360° around the sample (scanning time of 3 min). Projections were reconstructed by Rigaku software in image blocks of 512 × 512 × 512 voxels with an anisotropic voxel size of 20 μm. Data were stored in Dicom frame. Quantification of the jaw bone microarchitecture below the first molar was made by a CTscan Analyzer (Skyscan, release 1.13.5.1, Belgium). The region of interest (ROI) was drawn in the axial sections along the cortical zone between the first and second mesial roots. The bone was segmented in the ROI, and the following parameters were calculated using the CTAnalyzer: bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Trab.Th), trabecular number (Trab.N), trabecular pattern factor (Trab.Pf), and BMD. An internal density phantom, calibrated as in mg/cm3 of hydroxyapatite, was used to scale the bone density. Selected nomenclature was described in Bouxsein et al. (2010).

Twelve animals at stage P24 were used, six gld and six wild-type mice, with both groups consisting of animals of mixed gender. The size of the group was arranged to reach the statistical significance (at least for p ≤ 0.05). The averages and standard deviations were determined for all data sets. Normality of the data was tested by Shapiro-Wilks test. Data with a normal distribution (BV/TV, Trab.Th and BMD) were tested by Studen’s t-test (two-tailed), and other data (Trab.N and Trab.Pf) were tested by Mann–Whitney test.

FasL/Anti-FasL Application in MC3T3-E1 Cells

MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured in MEM Alpha medium (Gibco, United States) containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and penicillin/streptomycin (1,000 U/ml, 100 μg/ml). Recombinant Mouse (rm) FasL/TNFSF6 protein (526-SA, R&D Systems, United States) was diluted in a solution of 0.1% FCS in PBS at a final concentration 1 μg/ml. Mouse FasL/TNFSF6 antibody (anti-FasL) (MAB5262, R&D Systems, United States) was diluted in PBS and used in final dilution 20 μg/ml. The dose was determined according to producer recommendation and previously published experiments by Kovacic et al. (2007). Cells were seeded at 5,000 cells/cm2 and cultured with rmFasL/anti-FasL for 3 or 6 days simultaneously with control cultures. Cells were harvested using RLT buffer (Qiagen, United States) for further RNA isolation by RNeasy Mini Kit (74106, Qiagen, United States).

PCR Array

The heads of gld mice and wild-type mice (E15) collected into RNAlater (Ambion, United States) were washed in PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and histologically processed in paraffin. Sections (5 μm) were prepared, the mandibular bone was separated and RNA was extracted using RNeasy FFPE Kit (73504, Qiagen, United States) as described by Svandova et al. (2014).

Expression of osteogenic genes was assessed by a PCR Array. RNA was transcribed into cDNA and used for the PCR Array (Mouse Osteogenesis, PAMM-026Z; Qiagen, United States). Data (n = 6) were evaluated by Qiagen Data Analysis Center available at https://www.qiagen.com/kr/shop/genes-and-pathways/data-analysis-center-overview-page/. The software provides fold regulation values and statistical significance of the results (p ≤ 0.05). The threshold of fold regulation was established as ±2, representing a decrease/increase of 100% in the investigated sample.

The panel of genes in osteogenic PCR Array includes: Acvr1 (Activin A receptor, type I), Ahsg (Alpha 2-HS Glycoprotein), Alpl (Alkaline Phosphatase, Liver/Bone/Kidney), Anxa5 (Annexin A5), Bglap (Osteocalcin), Bgn (Biglycan), Bmp1 (Bone Morphogenetic Protein 1), Bmp2, Bmp3, Bmp3b/Gdf10 (Growth Differentiation Factor 10), Bmp4, Bmp5, Bmp6, Bmp7, Bmpr1a (Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor Type 1A), Bmpr1b, Bmpr2, Cd36 (Thrombospondin Receptor), Cdh11 (Cadherin 11), Chrd (Chordin), Col1a1 (Collagen Type I Alpha 1 Chain), Col1a2, Col2a1, Col3a1, Col4a1, Col5a1, Col10a1, Col14a1, Comp (Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein), Csf1/Mcsf (Colony Stimulating Factor 1/Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor 1), Csf2/GM-CSF (Colony Stimulating Factor 2), Csf3/GCSF (Colony Stimulating Factor 3), Ctsk (Cathepsin K), Dlx5 (Distal-Less Homeobox 5), Egf (Epidermal Growth Factor), Fgf1 (Fibroblast Growth Factor 1), Fgf2/bFGF, Fgfr1 (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1), Fgfr2, Flt1 (Fms Related Tyrosine Kinase 1), Fn1 (Fibronectin 1), Gli1 (GLI Family Zinc Finger 1), Igf1 (Insulin Like Growth Factor 1), Igf1r (Insulin Like Growth Factor 1 Receptor), Ihh (Indian Hedgehog), Icam1 (Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1), Itga2 (Integrin Subunit Alpha 2), Itga2b (Integrin Subunit Alpha 2b), Itga3, Itgam (Integrin Subunit Alpha M), Itgav (Integrin Subunit Alpha V), Itgb1 (Integrin Subunit Beta 1), Mmp2 (Matrix Metallopeptidase 2), Mmp8, Mmp9, Mmp10, Nfkb1 (Nuclear Factor Kappa B Subunit 1), Nog (Noggin), Pdgfa (Platelet Derived Growth Factor Subunit A), Phex (Phosphate Regulating Endopeptidase Homolog X-Linked), Runx2 (Runt Related Transcription Factor2), Serpinh1 (Serpin Family H Member 1), Smad1 (SMAD Family Member 1), Smad2, Smad3, Smad4, Smad5, Sost (Sclerostin), Sox9 (SRY-Box 9), Sp7 (Osterix), Spp1 (Osteopontin), Tgfb1 (Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1), Tgfb2, Tgfb3, Tgfbr1 (Transforming Growth Factor Beta Receptor 1), Tgfbr2, Tgfbr3, Tnf (Tumor Necrosis Factor), Tnfsf11 (TNF Superfamily Member 11), Twist1 (Twist Family BHLH Transcription Factor 1), Vcam1 (Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1), Vdr (Vitamin D Receptor), Vegfa (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A), Vegfb.

qPCR

qPCR was performed in 10 μl final reaction volumes containing the one-step master mix gb Ideal PCR Master Mix (Generi Biotech, Czech Republic) using LightCycler 96 (Roche, Switzerland) with preheating at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C/15 s and 62°C/1 min. Mmp2 expression levels (Mouse Mmp2, Mm00439498_m1, TaqMan Gene Expression Assay, Thermo Fischer Scientific, United States) were calculated using the ΔΔCT method, with normalization against actin levels (Mouse Actb, Mm02619580_g1, TaqMan Gene Expression Assay, Thermo Fischer Scientific, United States), which was used as the internal control. For both groups, analysis was performed in three biological replicates, reactions were performed in triplicates for each sample for statistical analysis (Student’s t-test, p ≤ 0.05).

Results

FasL Is Expressed by Non-apoptotic Osteoblasts in Prenatal Mandibular Bone

FasL (Figures 1B,C) was present already at stage (E13) of the mandibular bone formation (Figure 1A) committed to produce osteoblasts. At this stage, only random apoptotic cells can be observed within the mandible (Figures 1D,E). At E15, the stage when the first complex set of bone cells (osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoclasts) appears in the mouse mandibular bone related to the first molar development (Figure 1F), FasL displayed a much broader distribution (Figures 1G,H) than apoptosis (Figures 1I,J).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Temporo-spatial analysis of FasL expression and apoptosis. Morphology of the mandible visualized by haematoxylin-eosin staining at E13 (A) and E15 (F), immunohistochemical detection of FasL expression in the mandibular bone at E13 (B,C) and E15 (G,H), localization of apoptotic cells (TUNEL) in the mandibular bone at E13 (D,E) and E15 (I,J). Arrows point to the positive cells (immunohistochemistry-brown). Mandibular bone (MB), Meckel’s cartilage (MC), tooth germ (TG), oral cavity (OC). Scale bar = 100 μm (A,B,D,F,G,I), scale bar = 50 μm (C,E,H,J).

Taken together, at the early stage of the mandibular bone formation, FasL expression (Figures 2B,E) did not overlap with apoptosis pattern but strongly correlated with osteocalcin expressing cells/osteoblasts (Figures 2A,D). FasL expression also corresponded with some TRAP positive cells/osteoclasts (Figures 2C,F).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Correlation of FasL expression with markers of bone cells in prenatal (E15) mandibular bone. Distribution of osteocalcin-positive cells/osteoblasts (A,D), localization of FasL expression (B,E), localization of TRAP-positive cells/osteoclast (C,F). Positive cells (immunohistochemistry-brown, TRAP-purple), white arrows point to the osteoclasts, yellow arrows point to the osteoblasts. Scale bar = 50 μm.

FasL Deficiency Impacts Osteogenic Markers in the Mandibular Bone

In order to find out if FasL deficiency can impact osteogenic pathways in the forming mandibular bone, a PCR Array analysis allowing screening of 84 osteogenic genes was performed. Samples from the mandibular bone obtained from gld and wild type mice at E15 were used for comparison. In gld mice, the results revealed a statistically significant decrease of the expression of two genes (Figure 3A): matrix metalloproteinase 2 (Mmp2, fold regulation = -2.262, p = 0.0205) and sclerostin (Sost, fold regulation = -2.105, p = 0.0235).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Influence of FasL in expression of osteogenic markers at E15. Decrease in mRNA level of two osteogenic factors (Mmp2, Sost) in gld mice (n = 3 animals) compared to wild types (n = 3 animals), Mmp2 fold regulation -2.262, p = 0.0205, Sost fold regulation = -2.105, p = 0.0235, Student’s t-test, two-tailed (A), immunofluorescent detection of Mmp2 in gld mouse (B) and wild type (F), immunofluorescent detection of Sost in gld mouse (C) and wild type (G). Correlation of FasL (D,H) and Mmp2 (E,I) expression. Arrows point to cells expressing simultanously FasL and Mmp2. Mmp2 positive cells are green, Sost positive cells are red, nuclei are blue. Autofluorescence of blood cells is marked by asterisk. Bone matrix (BM). Scale bar = 100 μm (B–G), scale bar = 50 μm (H,I).

These results were further validated at the protein level by an immunofluorescence analysis also showing a decreasing trend in the mutant vs. the wild type mice for the Mmp2 (Figures 3B,F) and Sost proteins (Figures 3C,G). Besides, immunohistochemical staining performed on serial sections of E15 wild type mandibular bone allowed visualization of individual bone cells expressing both FasL (Figures 3D,H) and Mmp2 proteins (Figures 3E,I).

Experimental Modulation of FasL Impacts the Expression of Mmp2 in Osteoblastic Cells in vitro

MC3T3-E1 cell line derived from murine calvaria (intramembranous) bone (Figure 4A) that naturally produces FasL (Ozeki et al., 2002; Figure 4B) as well as Mmp2 (Mizutani et al., 2001; Figure 4C) were used for the functional experiments where alterations of Mmp2 expression (mRNA levels) after FasL stimulation or inhibition were followed. Sost is not expressed by MC3T3-E1 (Figure 4D).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

Regulation of Mmp2 expression in osteoblastic precursors (MC3T3-E1) using rmFasL/anti-FasL. Immunoflourescent detection of actin filaments (A), FasL (B), Mmp2 (C), and Sost (D) in MC3T3-E1 cells. Actin filaments, FasL, and Mmp2 positive cells are green, nuclei are blue. Expression of Mmp2 (mRNA) after: 3 days of rmFasL application compared to untreated cells resulted in 15% increase, p = 0.0295 (E), 6 days of rmFasL application compared to untreated cells resulted in 30% increase, p = 0.0210 (F), 3 days of anti-FasL application compared to untreated cells resulted in 14% decrease, p = 0.0024 (G), 6 days of anti-FasL application compared to untreated cells resulted in 20%, p = 0.0048 (H), 3 days of anti-FasL application/3 days of rmFasL treatment compared to untreated cells resulted in 27% increase, p = 0.0303 (I), 3 days of anti-FasL application/3 days of rmFasL treatment compared to 3 days of anti-FasL application/3 days of untreated culture resulted in 23% increase, p = 0.0262 (J). For each group n = 3. Scale bar = 100 μm. ∗p ≤ 0.05 and ∗∗p ≤ 0.01.

Mmp2 expression was evaluated after addition of recombinant FasL (rmFasL) to the culture medium, or endogenous FasL inhibition by anti FasL antibodies. Addition of rmFasL to MC3T3-E1 resulted in up to a 15% (p = 0.0295) increase in Mmp2 expression in comparison to control samples as soon as after 3 days of culture (Figure 4E). This increase was even higher after 6 days (30%, p = 0.0210) (Figure 4F). Conversely, cell treatment with anti-FasL antibodies caused up to a 14% decrease in Mmp2 expression (p = 0.0024) after 3 days of culture (Figure 4G), and a 20% decrease (p = 0.0048) after 6 days (Figure 4H).

Additionally, combinatory experiments were performed to evaluate a possible rescue effect of the treatments: 3 days anti-FasL + 3 days rmFasL led to a 27% increase in Mmp2 expression when compared to 6 days untreated (p = 0.0303) (Figure 4I); 3 days anti-FasL + 3 days rmFasL led to a 23% increase in Mmp2 expression when compared to 3 days anti-FasL + 3 days untreated (p = 0.0262) (Figure 4J).

These additional in vitro experiments further confirmed the modulatory effect of FasL on Mmp2 expression as identified by PCR Arrays from in vivo dissected bone samples.

Gld Jaw Bones Show Age Dependent Alterations in Bone Phenotype

In order to search for similarities in FasL and Mmp2 deficient mice, published data (Inoue et al., 2006) reporting an age-dependent phenotype in Mmp2-/- intramembranous bones were supplemented by analysis of jaw bones in the gld mice in prenatal and young adults. At E15, the stage subjected to PCR Array analysis, the mandibular bone of the gld mice showed an abnormal bone microarchitecture, which appeared to be underdeveloped as compared to the bones of wild-type mice (Figures 5A,B). Indeed, the area of mandibular bone matrix was decreased by 38%, p = 0.0392 (Figures 5C1,C2) in gld mice (avggld = 184.125 μm2, sdgld = 35.484) compared to the wild-type mice (avgwt = 296.026 μm2, sdwt = 53.478). This decrease in bone area did not appear to result from an increase in the osteoclast population (Figures 5E,F) since the osteoclast number, in the mandibular bone adjacent to the first molar region (Figures 5D1,D2), was not increased in the gld mice (avggld = 159, sdgld = 14) when compared to the wild types (avgwt = 296, sdwt = 47, p = 0.0079). The relative decrease of osteoclast number in gld mice may result from the reduced bone matrix area in gld. In addition, no apparent change in the distribution of apoptotic cells could be detected by the TUNEL assay when comparing mandibular bone of gld and wild type mice (Figures 5G,H).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

Analysis of prenatal (E15) jaw bone of gld mice. The mandibular bone visualized by trichrome staining in gld mouse (A) and wild-type mice (B), decrease of bone matrix in gld mice (n = 3 animals) compared to wild-type animals (n = 3 animals), avggld = 184.125 μm2, sdgld = 35.484, avgwt = 296.026 μm2, sdwt = 53.478, p = 0.0392 (C1,C2), decrease of osteoclasts detected by TRAP-staining in gld mice (n = 3 animals) compared to wild-type mice (n = 3 animals), avggld = 159, sdgld = 14, avgwt = 296, sdwt = 47, p = 0.0079 (D1,D2), TRAP-staining in gld (E) and wild-type mice (F) detection of apoptotic cells (TUNEL) in the mandibular bone of gld (G) and wild-type mice (H). Arrows point to the positive cells (immunohistochemistry-brown, TRAP-purple). Scale bar = 100 μm. ∗p ≤ 0.05 and ∗∗p ≤ 0.01.

MicroCT visualization in postnatal (P24) gld mice showed a slightly increased mineralization of the skull bones of gld mice compared to wild type animals, including the mandibular region (Figures 6A,B). Accordingly, the quantitative analysis showed a statistically significant increase (p = 0.0008, avggld = 0.3763 mm3, sdgld = 0.0301 vs. avgwt = 0.2978 mm3, sdwt = 0.0268) in bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) (Figure 6E), which was also observed in the frontal sections of the mandibles (Figures 6C,D). Further, analysis showed a statistically significant (p = 0.0007) increase in trabecular thickness (Trab.Th) in gld mice (avggld = 0.1020 mm, sdgld = 0.0046) when compared to wild type (avgwt = 0.0896 mm, sdwt = 0.0043) (Figure 6F). Statistically significant (p = 0.0152) increase in trabecular number (Trab.N) was observed in gld mice (avggld = 3.6872 1/mm, sdgld = 0.1874) in contrast to wild type animals (avgwt = 3.3277 1/mm, sdwt = 0.2954) (Figure 6G). The trabecular pattern factor (Trab.Pf) was significantly decreased (p = 0.0087) in gld mice (avggld = 6.0641 1/mm, sdgld = 1.0851), when compared to wild type mice (avgwt = 8.1548 1/mm, sdwt = 1.5312) (Figure 6H). The BMD of gld mice showed an increasing trend (avggld = 590.779 mg/cm3, sdgld = 85.619) vs. wild type mice (avgwt = 529.221 mg/cm3, sdwt = 23.988), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.1208, data not shown).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

Analysis of postnatal (P24) jaw bone of gld mice. Increased mineralization in gld (A) compared to wild-type mouse (B) where bright color shows increased mineralization, frontal section of the mandible of gld (C) and wild-type mice (D), increased BV/TV ratio in gld mice (n = 6 animals) compared to wild-type mice (n = 6 animals), avggld = 0.3763 mm3, sdgld = 0.0301 vs. avgwt = 0.2978 mm3, sdwt = 0.0268, p = 0.0008, Student’s t-test, two-tailed (E), increased Trab.Th in gld mice (n = 6 animals) compared to wild-type mice (n = 6 animals), avggld = 0.1020 mm, sdgld = 0.0046 vs. avgwt = 0.0896 mm, sdwt = 0.0043, p = 0.0007, Student’s t-test, two-tailed (F), increased Trab.N in gld mice (n = 6 animals) compared to wild-type mice (n = 6 animals), avggld = 3.6872 1/mm, sdgld = 0.1874 vs. avgwt = 3.3277 1/mm, sdwt = 0.2954, p = 0.0152, Mann–Whitney test (G), decreased Trab.Pf in gld mice (n = 6 animals) compared to wild-type mice (n = 6 animals), avggld = 6.0641 1/mm, sdgld = 1.0851 vs. avgwt = 8.1548 1/mm, sdwt = 1.5312, p = 0.0087, Mann–Whitney test (H). ∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, and ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001.

The data indicated specific age-dependent intramembranous mandibular bone phenotype in the gld mice.

Discussion

This report provides data pointing to novel functions of FasL in osteogenesis via modulation of Mmp2 expression in osteoblasts.

When looking at the expression pattern of FasL in the mandibular bone, FasL was already present in the bone forming mesenchymal cells at E13, when the extracellular matrix just became apparent. Expression of FasL was further apparent two days later, when the first complete set of bone cells became established in the mandibular bone (Alfaqeeh et al., 2013). As previously reported (Kawakami et al., 1997; Hatakeyama et al., 2000; Kovacic et al., 2007; Krum et al., 2008), FasL can be found in both, osteoblast and osteoclast cell populations (Park et al., 2005; Kovacic et al., 2007), widely communicating, e.g., via the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway (Udagawa et al., 1999; Glass et al., 2005).

In order to demonstrate that FasL is not necessarily associated with apoptosis, its tissue distribution was compared to that of TUNEL-positive cells within the forming mandibular bone. The results clearly showed distinct patterns, with FasL being mostly detected in non-apoptotic cells. These in vivo results are in agreement with earlier in vitro finding, where addition of FasL only weakly increased the proportion of apoptotic cells in both osteoclastogenic and osteoblastogenic cultures (Kovacic et al., 2007).

To further develop the thesis of a non-apoptotic FasL-triggered pathway in osteogenesis, FasL knock-out (gld) mice were analyzed. As expected, FasL deficiency did not significantly affect the apoptotic pattern within the early mandibular bone.

To find out if FasL deficiency might impact common osteogenic pathways, the expression screening of major osteogenic markers was performed in the mandibular bone using PCR Arrays. When comparing the data from gld vs. wild type mice the most significant decrease was observed for matrix metalloproteinase 2 (Mmp2).

Mmp2 is a membrane-associated protein involved in bone remodeling (Kusano et al., 1998), osteoclasts recruitment (Blavier and Delaisse, 1995; Kusano et al., 1998) and angiogenesis (Stetler-Stevenson, 1999). Mmp2 is mostly localized in osteoblasts (Gack et al., 1995). Based on the immunolocalization following the PCR Array analysis, Mmp2, as also FasL, is abundant from the earliest stages of the mandibular formation and is associated with osteoblasts. Interaction of FasL signalization with Mmp2 has been already documented in other system via NFkappaB–TIMP-2 pathway (Wisniewski et al., 2010).

In order to further support the evidence for a FasL effect on Mmp2, an osteoblastic cell line (MC3T3-E1) naturally expressing FasL and Mmp2 (Mizutani et al., 2001; Ozeki et al., 2002) was used to perform a set of functional experiments. Results of the in vitro analyses confirmed the engagement of FasL in regulation of Mmp2 expression as neutralization of FasL by anti-FasL resulted in a significant decrease of Mmp2 expression and conversely treatment by rmFasL resulted in an increased expression of Mmp2. In both cases, the effect of treatment on Mmp2 expression deepened with time of cultivation. Furthermore, several subsequent rescue experiments validated the mechanism.

The Mmp2 deficient mice showed a decreased BMD in the endochondral bones of limbs but an increased bone volume in the intramembranous calvaria causing calvarian sclerosis (Inoue et al., 2006). Notably, the phenotype was reported as age-dependent: the bone formation was significantly enhanced in the calvaria bone of the adults but not yet in 7 weeks animals (Inoue et al., 2006).

To search for matching data at the phenotype level in Mmp2 and FasL deficient bones, the investigation was supplemented by histological (prenatal) and microCT (postnatal) analysis of the gld mandibular bones, not investigated from earlier research focused on adult endochondral bones (Katavic et al., 2003). Notably, as in Mmp2 deficient mice, also the gld intramembranous bone phenotype displayed age dependent alterations. A mechanism was suggested to explain such phenomenon related to in vivo specific osteocyte-osteoblast networks, where the role of sclerostin was also emphasized (Zhao et al., 2000; Inoue et al., 2006). The number of osteocytes increases with age and the sclerotin they secreted inhibits osteoblast proliferation and differentiation (Delgado-Calle et al., 2017). The synergic impact of Sost on the phenotype would be in agreement with our data where FasL deficiency in vivo affected not only Mmp2 but also Sost expression.

In summary, these data provide new evidence for non-apoptotic functions of FasL during bone formation. For the first time, FasL expression at early stages of intramembranous ossification was reported and presence of FasL in non-apoptotic cells in the forming mandibular bone was shown. Additionally, it was demonstrated that FasL deficiency impacts the expression of important osteogenic genes including Mmp2 and jaw bone architecture. And finally, functional experiments proved that FasL regulates Mmp2 expression in osteoblastic cells. Altogether, since Mmp2 elevated levels were detected in sera of osteoporotic patients (Feng et al., 2016), the present study further strengthens a previously suggested engagement of Fas/FasL system in osteoporosis (Kovacic et al., 2010).

Author Contributions

ES prepared immunohistochemistry, morphological staining, apoptotic cells and TRAP-positive cells detection, tissue separation, RNA isolation, statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. BV performed immunofluorescent detection of markers, PCR Arrays, in vitro experiments, qPCR, and manuscript preparation. HL carried out 3D reconstructions and was engaged in manuscript preparation. AP analyzed microCT outcomes, ensured gld mice breeding and staging, and manuscript preparation. JS prepared microCT scans and reconstructions. EM was head of the project, responsible for design of study, experimental design, and manuscript preparation.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

E

embryonic day

P

postnatal day

Funding. This project was supported by Czech Science Foundation (GACR), project 16-18430S. The French team was supported by Université Paris Descartes, Fondation de la Recherche Médicale (FRM DGE20111123012).

References

  1. Alfaqeeh S. A., Gaete M., Tucker A. S. (2013). Interactions of the tooth and bone during development. J. Dent. Res. 92 1129–1135. 10.1177/0022034513510321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blavier L., Delaisse J. M. (1995). Matrix metalloproteinases are obligatory for the migration of preosteoclasts to the developing marrow cavity of primitive long bones. J. Cell Sci. 108 3649–3659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouxsein M. L., Boyd S. K., Christiansen B. A., Guldberg R. E., Jepsen K. J., Müller R. (2010). Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25 1468–1486. 10.1002/jbmr.141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Delgado-Calle J., Amy Y., Bellido T. (2017). Role and mechanism of action of sclerostin in bone. Bone 96 29–37. 10.1016/j.bone.2016.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Feng P., Zhang H., Zhang Z., Dai X., Mao T., Fan Y., et al. (2016). The interaction of MMP-2/B7-H3 in human osteoporosis. Clin. Immunol. 162 118–124. 10.1016/j.clim.2015.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Franz-Odendaal T. A. (2011). Induction and patterning of intramembranous bone. Front. Biosci. 16 2734–2746. 10.2741/3882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gack S., Vallon R., Schmidt J., Grigoriadis A., Tuckermann J., Schenkel J., et al. (1995). Expression of interstitial collagenase during skeletal development of the mouse is restricted to osteoblast-like cells and hypertrophic chondrocytes. Cell Growth Differ. 6 759–767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Glass D. A., Bialek P., Ahn J. D., Starbuck M., Patel M. S., Clevers H., et al. (2005). Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev. Cell 8 751–764. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Griffith T. S., Brunner T., Fletcher S. M., Green D. R., Ferguson T. A. (1995). Fas ligand-induced apoptosis as a mechanism of immune privilege. Science 270 1189–1192. 10.1126/science.270.5239.1189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hatakeyama S., Tomichi N., Ohara-Nemoto Y., Satoh M. (2000). The immunohistochemical localization of Fas and Fas ligand in jaw bone and tooth germ of human fetuses. Calcif. Tissue Int. 66 330–337. 10.1007/s002230010069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Inoue K., Mikuni-Takagaki Y., Oikawa K., Itoh T., Inada M., Noguchi T., et al. (2006). Crucial role for matrix metalloproteinase 2 in osteocytic canalicular formation and bone metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 281 33814–33824. 10.1074/jbc.M607290200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Josefsen D., Myklebust J. H., Lynch D. H., Stokke T., Blomhoff H. K., Smeland E. B. (1999). Fas ligand promotes cell survival of immature human bone marrow CD34 + CD38- hematopoietic progenitor cells by suppressing apoptosis. Exp. Hematol. 27 1451–1459. 10.1016/S0301-472X(99)00073-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katavic V., Lukic I. K., Kovacic N., Grcevic D., Lorenzo J. A., Marusic A. (2003). Increased bone mass is a part of the generalized lymphoproliferative disorder phenotype in the mouse. J. Immunol. 170 1540–1547. 10.4049/jimmunol.170.3.1540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kawakami A., Eguchi K., Matsuoka N., Tsuboi M., Koji T., Urayama S., et al. (1997). Fas and Fas ligand interaction is necessary for human osteoblast apoptosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12 1637–1646. 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kovacic N., Grcevic D., Katavic V., Lukic I. K., Marusic A. (2010). Targeting Fas in osteoresorptive disorders. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 14 1121–1134. 10.1517/14728222.2010.522347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kovacic N., Lukic I. K., Grcevic D., Katavic V., Croucher P., Marusic A. (2007). The Fas/Fas ligand system inhibits differentiation of murine osteoblasts but has a limited role in osteoblast and osteoclast apoptosis. J. Immunol. 178 3379–3389. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.6.3379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Krum S. A., Miranda-Carboni G. A., Hauschka P. V., Carroll J. S., Lane T. F., Freedman L. P., et al. (2008). Estrogen protects bone by inducing Fas ligand in osteoblasts to regulate osteoclast survival. EMBO J. 27 535–545. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kusano K., Miyaura C., Inada M., Tamura T., Ito A., Nagase H., et al. (1998). Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2, -3, -9, and -13) by interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 in mouse calvaria: association of MMP induction with bone resorption. Endocrinology 139 1338–1345. 10.1210/endo.139.3.5818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mizutani A., Sugiyama I., Kuno E., Matsunaga S., Tsukagoshi N. (2001). Expression of matrix metalloproteinases during ascorbate-induced differentiation of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 162043–2049. 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.11.2043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nakamura T., Imai Y., Matsumoto T., Sato S., Takeuchi K., Igarashi K., et al. (2007). Estrogen prevents bone loss via estrogen receptor alpha and induction of Fas ligand in osteoclasts. Cell 130 811–823. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ozeki N., Mogi M., Nakamura H., Togari A. (2002). Differential expression of the Fas-Fas ligand system on cytokine-induced apoptotic cell death in mouse osteoblastic cells. Arch. Oral Biol. 47 511–517. 10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00035-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Park H., Jung Y. K., Park O. J., Lee Y. J., Choi J. Y., Choi Y. (2005). Interaction of Fas ligand and Fas expressed on osteoclast precursors increases osteoclastogenesis. J. Immunol. 175 7193–7201. 10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rippo M. R., Babini L., Prattichizzo F., Graciotti L., Fulgenzi G., Tomassoni Ardori F., et al. (2013). Low FasL levels promote proliferation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, higher levels inhibit their differentiation into adipocytes. Cell Death Dis. 4:e594. 10.1038/cddis.2013.115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stetler-Stevenson W. G. (1999). Matrix metalloproteinases in angiogenesis: a moving target for therapeutic intervention. J. Clin. Invest. 103 1237–1241. 10.1172/JCI6870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Suda T., Takahashi T., Golstein P., Nagata S. (1993). Molecular cloning and expression of the Fas ligand, a novel member of the tumor necrosis factor family. Cell 75 1169–1178. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90326-L [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Svandova E., Lesot H., Vanden Berghe T., Tucker A. S., Sharpe P. T., Vandenabeele P., et al. (2014). Non-apoptotic functions of caspase-7 during osteogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 5:e1366. 10.1038/cddis.2014.330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Svandova E., Vesela B., Tucker A. S., Matalova E. (2018). Activation of pro-apoptotic caspases in non-apoptotic cells during odontogenesis and related osteogenesis. Front. Physiol. 9:174. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tsutsui H., Nakanishi K., Matsui K., Higashino K., Okamura H., Miyazawa Y., et al. (1996). IFN-gamma-inducing factor up-regulates Fas ligand-mediated cytotoxic activity of murine natural killer cell clones. J. Immunol. 1573967–3973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Udagawa N., Takahashi N., Jimi E., Matsuzaki K., Tsurukai T., Itoh K., et al. (1999). Osteoblasts/stromal cells stimulate osteoclast activation through expression of osteoclast differentiation factor/RANKL but not macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Bone 25 517–523. 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00210-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang L., Liu S., Zhao Y., Liu D., Liu Y., Chen C., et al. (2015). Osteoblast-induced osteoclast apoptosis by FAS ligand/FAS pathway is required for maintenance of bone mass. Cell Death Differ. 22 1654–1664. 10.1038/cdd.2015.14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wisniewski P., Ellert-Miklaszewska A., Kwiatkowska A., Kaminska B. (2010). Non-apoptotic Fas signaling regulates invasiveness of glioma cells and modulates MMP-2 activity via NFkappaB-TIMP-2 pathway. Cell. Signal. 22 212–220. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhao W., Byrne M. H., Wang Y., Krane S. M. (2000). Osteocyte and osteoblast apoptosis and excessive bone deposition accompany failure of collagenase cleavage of collagen. J. Clin. Investig. 106 941–949. 10.1172/JCI10158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES