Abstract
A novel dual-cytokine antibody fusion protein, consisting of an antibody directed against CD38 [a tumor-associated antigen mainly expressed on the surface of multiple myeloma (MM) cells], simultaneously fused to both tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 10 (TRAIL) and interleukin-2 (IL2), was designed, expressed and purified to homogeneity. The novel fusion protein, termed IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL, was able to selectively recognize its cognate antigen expressed on the surface of MM and lymphoma cell lines, as evidenced by flow cytometry analysis. Moreover, the targeted version of TRAIL was able to induce cancer cell death in vitro, both with MM cell lines and with fresh isolates from the bone marrow of MM patients. The experiments provide a rationale for possible future applications of IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL for the treatment of patients with MM or other CD38-positive malignancies.
Keywords: CD38, IL2, TRAIL, Immunocytokines, Multiple Myeloma
Introduction
Haematological malignancies are cancer disorders of the blood and lymphatic organs, which can be subdivided into myeloid and lymphoid neoplasm [1–4]. Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematological malignancy derived from the B cell lineage, characterized by a monoclonal proliferation and accumulation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. The disease typically presents with hypercalcaemia, renal insufficiency, anemia and bone lesions and may ultimately lead to death as a result of infections, bleeding, fracture complications, kidney failure or blood clots in the lung [1, 2, 5–8]. MM represents about 10% of haematological malignancies and, in most cases, is still an incurable disease [9, 10].
Conventional anticancer therapy for the treatment of MM relies on chemotherapy. In recent years, the use of drugs targeting proteasome function or acting as immunomodulatory agents (e.g., bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and pomalidomide alone or in combination) have gained in importance [11–14]. MM cells are more sensitive to proteasome inhibition than non-transformed lymphocytes, due to an increased cellular stress related to high-level protein production. However, usually only a small portion of patients benefit from pharmacological treatment [2, 10, 15]. High dose chemotherapy with Melphalan combined with autologous stem cell transplantation represents a treatment option for eligible patients (fit and usually not older than 70 years) [16]. This approach resulted in prolonged survival rates, with a small proportion of patients reaching long-term remissions lasting for many years. [2, 15]. However, elderly patients, which represent the majority of MM patients, are not eligible for this treatment option because of associated morbidities and for this reason, alternative therapeutic strategies are urgently required.
Immune check point inhibitors are revolutionizing the field of cancer therapy and have been considered also for the treatment of haematological diseases [17]. In the clinic, pembrolizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) has been used in combination with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs in patients with relapsed/refractory MM, showing encouraging results [18, 19]. However, relevant toxicities were observed, which included neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and other non-hematologic side effects.
Targeted cancer immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies represents an attractive biomedical strategy, particularly in the field of haematological malignancies. The efficacy of therapeutic antibodies relies on the ability of the product to (i) selectively bind to their cognate antigen, (ii) induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and/or complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) or (iii) block signalling by binding to certain receptors/growth factors. For example, treatment with rituximab (an anti-CD20 antibody) was found to be efficacious in patients with various types of B cell-derived malignancies [20]. However, B cells lose CD20 expression upon differentiation into plasma cells [21], therefore limiting the use and the efficacy of rituximab in patients with MM [22].
Recently, more specific cell surface proteins (which are preferentially expressed on MM cells) have been considered as targets for the development of therapeutic antibodies. Two membrane proteins, SLAMF7 and CD38, have been extensively investigated and validated for the generation of therapeutic antibodies against MM. Indeed, two antibody products (elotuzumab and daratumumab, directed against SLAMF7 and CD38, respectively) [21, 23] have been investigated in clinical trials for the treatment of MM (alone or in combination with chemotherapy) [23–25] and have received marketing authorization. Moreover, daratumumab has shown encouraging in vitro antitumor activities in patient-derived chronic lymphocytic leukemia samples [26], therefore expanding the potential application of this product to other CD38-positive malignancies.
The combination of daratumumab with (i) lenalidomide and dexamethasone, (ii) bortezomib and dexamethasone or (iii) bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone showed marked increase in progression free survival and overall response rates compared to lenalidomid dexamethasone, bortezomib dexamethasone or bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone alone. [25, 27, 28]. These results show the potential of CD38 antibodies. However, the efficacy might be further increased.
Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins (“immunocytokines”) may represent an alternative to conventional immunological treatments. IL2-based immunocytokines, in combination with rituximab, were found to induce complete responses in rodent models of haematological diseases [29], providing a rationale for the development of novel antibody-cytokine fusions for the treatment of MM. Our group described that the simultaneous delivery of two cytokine payloads (IL2 and TNF) to neoplastic lesions was able to induce complete responses in patients with stage IIIB/C melanoma [30]. More recently, we have also described a novel class of biopharmaceutical products, named “potency-matched dual cytokine-antibody fusions”, in which two cytokine payloads of comparable potency are fused with a tumor-homing antibody moiety [31]. This novel class of biopharmaceutical products is able to induce complete responses in several immunocompetent mouse models of cancer.
Members of the TNF superfamily (including TNF, FasL, Light and TRAIL) can induce apoptosis of malignant cells by interacting with cognate cell surface receptors [32, 33]. However, only a modest anti-cancer activity has been observed so far (both in vitro with MM cells and in vivo in xenograft models) when using recombinant TRAIL as therapeutic agent [34]. It has recently become apparent that the unstable non-covalent homotrimeric structure of TRAIL may limit pharmaceutical applications, as a result of suboptimal pharmacokinetic [32] and pharmacodynamic properties. For this reason, the group of Roland Kontermann engineered TRAIL mutants, connecting three TRAIL monomeric units into a single polypeptide [35]. These novel proteins showed improved thermal stability and potent anti-cancer activity, thus providing the basis for the development of novel tumor-homing antibody-TRAIL fusions. In addition, Apogenix and AbbVie are developing hexameric TRAIL derivatives, consisting of single-chain trimeric TRAIL units fused to a human Fc fragment, serving as homodimerization and serum half-life extension moiety [36].
In this article, we describe the generation, the characterization and the in vitro anti-cancer properties of a novel “dual-cytokine antibody fusion protein” based on an anti-CD38 antibody [21] fragment simultaneously fused to IL2 and to TRAIL [35]. The resulting product, termed IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL, was able to selectively bind to multiple myeloma and lymphoma cell lines in vitro, inducing a selective cancer cell death and providing a rationale for future therapeutic applications.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines and patient samples
CHO cells, RAMOS lymphoma cells and RPMI8226 myeloma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATTC) between 2015 and 2017, expanded and stored as cryopreserved aliquots in liquid nitrogen. Cells were grown according to the supplier’s protocol and kept in culture for no longer than 14 passages. Authentication of the cell lines also including check of post-freeze viability, growth properties and morphology, test for mycoplasma contamination, isoenzyme assay and sterility test were performed by the cell bank before shipment. Clinical bone marrow biopsies were obtained from pretreated MM patients upon written informed consent. Ethical approval was granted by the Zurich cantonal ethics committee. Mononuclear cells were isolated by density centrifugation.
Cloning, expression and protein characterization
The fusion protein IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL contains an anti-CD38 antibody variable regions [21], in homodimeric tandem ScFv arrangement [37, 38], fused to human IL2 [39] at the N-terminus by a 12-amino-acid linker and to human TRAIL in single chain format (scTRAIL) at the C-terminus, as described before [35]. The gene encoding for the anti-CD38 antibody, human IL2 and scTRAIL were PCR amplified, PCR assembled and cloned into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1(+) (Invitrogen) using a strategy similar to the one described before by our laboratory [40]. A fusion protein in which the gene encoding for human IL2 is not present (αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL) was cloned similarly. The fusion protein αCD38 in SIP format was cloned into the vector pcDNA3.1(+) as described before [41].
The fusion proteins were expressed using transient gene expression in CHO cells as described previously [40, 42] and purified from the cell culture medium to homogeneity by protein L (GenScript) chromatography. Purified proteins were analysed by size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 10/300 GL, GE Healthcare), SDS-PAGE and ESI-MS. The biological activity of TRAIL was determined on RAMOS cells. In 96-well plates, cells (25’000 per well) were incubated in medium supplemented with varying concentrations of the fusion proteins. After 24 hours at 37°C, cell viability was determined with Cell Titer Aqueous One Solution (Promega). Results were expressed as the percentage of cell viability compared to untreated cells.
Flow cytometry
Antigen expression on RAMOS and RPMI8226 cells was confirmed by flow cytometry. Cells were centrifuged and washed in cold FACS buffer (0.5% BSA, 2mM EDTA in PBS) and stained with IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL (final concentration 10μg/mL) and detected with rat anti-IL2 (eBioscience 14-7029-85) and anti rat-AlexaFluor488 (Invitrogen A21208). Omission of the primary antibody was used as negative control.
The ability of IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL to selectively kill multiple myeloma was confirmed by flow cytometry on the RPMI8226 cell line. In 96-well plates, cells (25’000 per well) were incubated in medium supplemented with varying concentrations of the fusion protein. After 24 hours at 37°C, cells were washed with FACS buffer and stained with anti-CD138-APC (Biolegend 352308). Cell viability was determined with 7-AAD staining (Biolegend 420403). All samples were analysed on a 2-L Cytoflex Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter).
Isolated mononuclear cells from patients with MM were incubated with IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL at varying concentrations in RPMI medium (supplemented with Fetal Bovine Serum and antibiotics/antimitotic solution) and incubated 16 hours at 37°C. Cells were washed with FACS buffer and stained with anti-CD138-APC (Biolegend 352308). Cell viability was determined with 7-AAD staining (Biolegend 420403). All samples were analysed on a 2-L Cytoflex Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter).
Immunofluorescence studies
Antigen expression was confirmed on ice-cold acetone fixed 8-μm cryostat sections of RAMOS stained with anti-CD38 (SIP) (final concentration 5μg/mL) and detected with rabbit anti-IgE (Dako A0094) and anti-rabbit AlexaFluor488 (Invitrogen A11008). For vascular staining rat anti-CD31 (BD 553370) and anti-rat AlexaFluor594 (Invitrogen A21209) antibodies were used. Slides were mounted with fluorescent mounting medium and analysed with Axioskop2 mot plus microscope (Zeiss).
Results
Production and characterization of a IL2/TRAIL based dual-cytokine antibody fusion protein
A fusion protein, consisting of an anti-CD38 antibody [21] in tandem diabody format [37] simultaneously fused by short peptide linkers to human IL2 and TRAIL (in single chain format [35]), was cloned for expression in mammalian cells [Figure 1a]. The resulting product, termed IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL, was expressed in CHO cells and purified to homogeneity by affinity chromatography on a Protein L resin. The fusion protein was stable and well-behaved in conventional biochemical assays, as evidenced by gel filtration, SDS-PAGE and ESI-MS analysis [Figure 1b-d]. Figure 1e reports the amino acid sequence of IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL.
Figure 1. Cloning, expression and characterization of IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL.
(a) Schematic representation of the cloning strategy and of the domain assembly. (b) Size exclusion chromatography profile of IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL (120 kDa, black line), IgG (150 kDa, blue line) and SIP (80 kDa, green line) were used as controls for the column’s calibration. (c) SDS-PAGE analysis: MW, molecular weight; NR, nonreducing conditions; R, reducing conditions. (d) ESI-MS profile. (e) Amino acid sequence of IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL. Starting from the N-terminus: human IL2, the αCD38 antibody in tandem diabody format and TRAIL in single chain format.
In vitro characterization on RAMOS cells
Binding of IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL to its cognate antigen (CD38) was assessed by flow cytometry on RAMOS (CD38+) cells [Figure 2a]. A microscopic fluorescence analysis of RAMOS xenograft tumor sections, confirmed CD38 expression in vivo [Figure 2b]. An in vitro-based killing assay on RAMOS cells [Figure 2c] confirmed the ability of TRAIL-based fusion proteins to selectively kill CD38+ lymphoma cells in vitro at ultra-low concentrations [IC50 ~ 1 pM for both IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL and αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL, a fusion protein produced with similar methodologies but devoid of the IL2 moiety]. In this assay, the IL2 moiety did not appear to contribute to cancer cell toxicity in vitro, but the payload may be important in vivo, contributing to a pro-inflammatory environment at the site of disease by direct activation of NK cells and T cells [39, 43].
Figure 2. In vitro characterization on RAMOS cells.
(a) Flow cytometric evaluation of CD38 expression by RAMOS, detected with IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL. (b) Microscopic fluorescence analysis of CD38 expression on RAMOS tumor section detected with αCD38 (SIP) (green for anti-human IgE, AlexaFluor 488) and anti CD31 (red, AlexaFluor 594), 20x magnification, scale bar = 100μm. (c) TRAIL bioactivity assay, based on the killing of RAMOS cell.
In vitro characterization on RPMI8226 cells and on patient-derived MM specimens
Binding of IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL to a CD38+ multiple myeloma cell line (RPMI8226) was confirmed by flow cytometry [Figure 3a]. The ability of the fusion protein to selectively kill multiple myeloma cells (CD138+) in vitro was further confirmed by flow cytometry using the RPMI8226 cell line, with almost complete cell killing at 25 nM concentration of fusion protein and 24h incubation [Figure 3b]. Similarly, incubation of patient-derived MM cells with IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL, resulted in a selective killing of CD138+ cells [Figure 3c].
Figure 3. Activity against MM cells.
(a) Flow cytometric evaluation of the binding of IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL to RPMI8226 cells, detected with an anti-IL2 reagent. (b) Selective killing of RPMI8226 cells 24 hours after incubation with 25 nM IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL. Dual-color flow cytometry analysis for CD138-APC and 7-AAD indicates that the fusion protein induced cell death (revealed by 7-AAD staining) in CD138-positive cells. Quadrants were set in order to differentiate CD138+ cells from unstained cells. (c) Selective killing of freshly isolated MM patient cells, upon 16 h incubation with the fusion protein.
Discussion
In this work we have shown that the integration of IL2 and TRAIL (used as a single-chain polypeptide) into a novel antibody-based fusion proteins specific to CD38 (a marker of MM) resulted in a novel product (IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL) with excellent biochemical characteristics. The immunocytokine could be expressed in mammalian cells and purified to homogeneity, as revealed by SDS-PAGE, mass spectrometry and size exclusion chromatography. The two payloads have biological activity at comparable molar concentrations and, for this reason, a tuning of the potency of the individual cytokines by mutagenesis was not required. The use of non-mutated immunostimulatory payloads may decrease the risk of immunogenicity for in vivo applications of the product.
The novel fusion protein retained the binding properties of the parental antibody [21], as evidenced by flow cytometry analysis on CD38 positive human cell lines. Moreover, the targeted delivery of TRAIL induced a selective cell death in vitro against both multiple myeloma and lymphoma cell lines, as well as against bone marrow-derived MM isolates from patients. The incorporation of IL2 into the same product was not found to interfere with the activity of TRAIL in vitro. In vivo, the payload may help recruit and activate immune effector cells (e.g. T cells and NK cells), thus potentiating anticancer activity at the site of disease [29, 31].
The fully human nature of the novel IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL fusion protein hinders a characterization of its pharmacodynamics properties in a fully syngeneic setting, since the αCD38 and the scTRAIL moieties do not cross-react with the cognate murine targets. A fully murine fusion protein, serving as a “surrogate” for preclinical testing in immunocompetent mouse models of cancer may be needed in order to assess the therapeutic potential of the novel fusion protein. Alternatively, as previously reported for daratumumab, it may be possible to test in vivo activity in immunodeficient mice injected with human CD38-positive Daudi cells [21], prior to safety pharmacological assessment in non-human primates.
Funding information
This work was supported by ETH Zürich, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant “Zauberkugel”), the Swiss Federal Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI Project “DUAL CYTOKINE-ANTIBODY FUSIONS”), the “Stiftung zur Krebsbekämpfung” and the Clinical Research Priority Program of the University of Zurich.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
Dario Neri is co-founder, shareholder and member of the board of Philogen, a company working on antibody therapeutics. The authors declare no additional conflict of interest.
PEDS Board Member responsible for editing: Jim Huston jim.huston.boston@gmail.com
References
- 1.Smith L, et al. Multiple myeloma and physical activity: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(11):e009576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gozzetti A, et al. Therapeutic advancements in multiple myeloma. Front Oncol. 2014;4:241. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arber DA, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016 doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Swerdlow SH, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 2016;127(20):2375. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matsui W, et al. Characterization of clonogenic multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2004;103(6):2332–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mai EK, et al. A systematic classification of death causes in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Journal. 2018;8(3):30. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0068-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kyle RA, et al. Review of 1027 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2003;78(1):21–33. doi: 10.4065/78.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hideshima T, et al. Understanding multiple myeloma pathogenesis in the bone marrow to identify new therapeutic targets. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2007;7:585. doi: 10.1038/nrc2189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sant M, et al. Incidence of hematologic malignancies in Europe by morphologic subtype: results of the HAEMACARE project. Blood. 2010;116(19):3724. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-282632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Braggio E, Kortüm KM, Stewart AK. SnapShot: Multiple Myeloma. Cancer Cell. 2015;28(5):678–678.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kortuem KM, Stewart AK. Carfilzomib. Blood. 2013;121(6):893. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-459883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kritharis A, et al. Lenalidomide in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: biological perspectives and therapeutic opportunities. Blood. 2015;125(16):2471. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-567792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Murray Megan Y, Auger Martin J, Bowles Kristian M. Overcoming bortezomib resistance in multiple myeloma. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2014;42(4):804. doi: 10.1042/BST20140126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Scott LJ. Pomalidomide: A Review of Its Use in Patients with Recurrent Multiple Myeloma. Drugs. 2014;74(5):549–562. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0196-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chim CS, et al. Management of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: novel agents, antibodies, immunotherapies and beyond. Leukemia. 2017 doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Costa LJ, et al. Recent trends in multiple myeloma incidence and survival by age, race, and ethnicity in the United States. Blood Advances. 2017;1(4):282. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016002493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sharma P, Allison JP. Immune checkpoint targeting in cancer therapy: toward combination strategies with curative potential. Cell. 2015;161(2):205–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.San Miguel J, et al. Pembrolizumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Keynote-023. Blood. 2015;126(23):505. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Badros AZ, et al. A Phase II Study of Anti PD-1 Antibody Pembrolizumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Blood. 2015;126(23):506. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Subramanian J, et al. Rituximab in the treatment of follicular lymphoma: the future of biosimilars in the evolving therapeutic landscape. Cancer Management and Research. 2017;9:131–140. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S120589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Weers M, et al. Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors. J Immunol. 2011;186(3):1840–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zojer N, et al. Rituximab treatment provides no clinical benefit in patients with pretreated advanced multiple myeloma. Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2006;47(6):1103–1109. doi: 10.1080/10428190600564803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van de Donk NW, et al. Clinical efficacy and management of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 and SLAMF7 in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;127(6):681–95. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-10-646810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lokhorst HM, et al. Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab Monotherapy in Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1207–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Palumbo A, et al. Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):754–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Matas-Cespedes A, et al. The Human CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Daratumumab Shows Antitumor Activity and Hampers Leukemia-Microenvironment Interactions in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(6):1493–1505. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mateos M-V, et al. Daratumumab plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone for Untreated Myeloma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;378(6):518–528. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dimopoulos MA, et al. Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(14):1319–1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schliemann C, et al. Complete eradication of human B-cell lymphoma xenografts using rituximab in combination with the immunocytokine L19-IL2. Blood. 2009;113(10):2275–83. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-160747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Danielli R, et al. Intralesional administration of L19-IL2/L19-TNF in stage III or stage IVM1a melanoma patients: results of a phase II study. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy. 2015;64(8):999–1009. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1704-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.De Luca R, et al. Potency-matched Dual Cytokine–Antibody Fusion Proteins for Cancer Therapy. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2017;16(11):2442. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hemmerle T, et al. Tumor targeting properties of antibody fusion proteins based on different members of the murine tumor necrosis superfamily. J Biotechnol. 2014;172:73–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fellermeier S, et al. Advancing targeted co-stimulation with antibody-fusion proteins by introducing TNF superfamily members in a single-chain format. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(11):e1238540. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1238540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mitsiades CS, et al. TRAIL/Apo2L ligand selectively induces apoptosis and overcomes drug resistance in multiple myeloma: therapeutic applications. Blood. 2001;98(3):795. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.3.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Siegemund M, et al. An optimized antibody-single-chain TRAIL fusion protein for cancer therapy. MAbs. 2016;8(5):879–91. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1172163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Morgan-Lappe SE. Abstract DDT01-03: ABBV-621: A best-in-class TRAIL-receptor agonist fusion protein that enhances optimal clustering for the treatment of solid and hematologic tumors. Cancer Research. 2017;77(13 Supplement):DDT01–03. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pasche N, et al. The antibody-based delivery of interleukin-12 to the tumor neovasculature eradicates murine models of cancer in combination with paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(15):4092–103. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Huston JS, et al. Protein engineering of antibody binding sites: recovery of specific activity in an anti-digoxin single-chain Fv analogue produced in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1988;85(16):5879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.5879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Carnemolla B, et al. Enhancement of the antitumor properties of interleukin-2 by its targeted delivery to the tumor blood vessel extracellular matrix. Blood. 2002;99(5):1659. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.5.1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pasche N, et al. Cloning and characterization of novel tumor-targeting immunocytokines based on murine IL7. Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;154(1):84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brack SS, et al. Tumor-Targeting Properties of Novel Antibodies Specific to the Large Isoform of Tenascin-C. Clinical Cancer Research. 2006;12(10):3200. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rajendra Y, et al. A simple high-yielding process for transient gene expression in CHO cells. Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;153(1–2):22–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yang RK, et al. Intratumoral hu14.18-IL-2 (IC) induces local and systemic antitumor effects that involve both activated T and NK cells as well as enhanced IC retention. J Immunol. 2012;189(5):2656–64. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



