Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Med Res Arch. 2018 Mar 15;6(3):1719. doi: 10.18103/mra.v6i3.1719

Primary Central Nervous System Germ Cell Tumors: A Review and Update

Kaleigh Fetcko 1, Mahua Dey 1,*
PMCID: PMC6157918  NIHMSID: NIHMS952207  PMID: 30271875

Abstract

Importance

Primary central nervous system (CNS) germ cell tumors (GCT) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that are still poorly understood. In North America, GCTs comprise approximately 1% of primary brain tumors in pediatric and young adult patients. GCTs can occur as pure or mixed subtypes; they are divided into germinomas, which are the most common subtype, and non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs), which consist of approximately one-third of GCTs and include teratomas, embryonal carcinomas, choriocarcinomas, and yolk sac tumors.

Observations

While the etiology of primary CNS GCT is not entirely clear, the various subtypes are lineage-related and may involve progenitor germ cells that fail to migrate and become trapped in midline locations. Primary CNS GCT most commonly arises in the pineal region but also occur in other areas. Presenting symptoms can include headache, Parinaud syndrome, diabetes insipidus, precosious puberty, ataxia, or hemiparesis. Diagnosis of primary CNS GCTs can be difficult and is often delayed. Various imaging studies and tumor markers can assist in specific diagnosis. Treatment plans differ depending on the subtype of GCT and may vary among physicians and institutions. Germinomas have a favorable prognosis with a greater than 90% overall survival, while NGGCTs only have survival rates ranging from 40–70%.

Conclusions and Relevance

Germinomas seem to be most effectively treated with chemotherapy and radiation, while NGGCT usually require surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation with the exception of mature teratomas frequently curable with surgery alone. Gamma knife radiosurgery is a promising treatment that may be an effective additional treatment option. Cytogenic and molecular analyses are attempting to further specify the different GCT subtypes and are helping to direct the development of distinct therapeutic targets to improve treatment and prognosis.

Keywords: CNS germ cell tumor, intracranial germ cell tumor, germinomas, nongerminomas

INTRODUCTION

The second most common location for extragonadal germ cell tumors (GCT) is the central nervous system (CNS)1. Primary CNS GCT are a heterogeneous group of tumors that are still poorly understood in regards to etiology and molecular biology, which in turn can lead to difficulties in diagnosis and treatment. In North America, germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise approximately 1% of primary brain tumors in pediatric and young adult patients with a median age of diagnosis of 16 years 2. In the United States, the overall GCT incidence is 0.6 per million per year while 1.0 per million per year in Europe and 2.7 per million per year in Japan3. Primary CNS GCTs can occur as pure or mixed subtype tumors; in the United States and Europe, GCTs are commonly are divided into germinomas, which are the most common subtype, and non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs), which consist of approximately one-third of GCTs and include teratomas, embryonal carcinomas, choriocarcinomas, and yolk sac tumors36. Teratomas can be classified further as mature, containing entirely fully differentiated tissues, or immature, containing mostly embryonic or fetal tissues7. Alternatively Japanese classification of GCT subtypes is separated into good, intermediate, and poor prognosis groups8. The good prognosis group includes pure germinoma and mature teratoma; the intermediate prognosis group contains mixed tumors with mainly germinoma or teratoma and immature teratomas; and the poor prognosis group consists of choriocarcinoma, yolk sac tumor, embryonal carcinoma, and mixed tumors with components from any of the subtypes of this group 9,10.

CNS GCTs occur more frequently in the Asian population and are present more commonly in males with significantly higher rates in the pineal location; however, suprasellar germinomas were noted more frequently in females 1,2,4,11. Goodwin and colleagues noted that among 700 cases of GCTs across 17 diverse regions, NGGCT specifically are not associated with a particular sex, location, race, or age with the exception of infant patients (Table 1) 2. Timely diagnosis of primary central nervous system GCTs can be challenging due to nonspecific symptoms12,13. Additionally, treatment plans can differ depending on the subtype of GCT and can vary among different physicians and institutions. We reviewed the current literature to discuss the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, assessment and diagnosis, treatment, molecular biology, and prognosis of primary CNS GCTs.

Table 1.

Major epidemiologic facts about primary CNS GCT

Germinomas Non-germinomatous germ cell tumors
Males Not associated with a particular sex, location, race, or age with the exception of infant patients
Pineal location
Asian

DISCUSSION

Pathophysiology

While the etiology of primary CNS GCT is unclear, and there are several hypotheses that attempt to explain this disease process2. Germ cells are believed to be pluripotent and able to differentiate into any type of cell14. These cells originate in the yolk sac of the embryo around the third to fourth week of gestation, normally destined for the ovaries or testes but can aberrantly migrate to other locations for unknown reasons14 Some believe that progenitor germ cells wrongly migrate and become trapped in midline locations along the anteroposterior axis of the body as supported by extracranial GCTs in other midline sites, such as mediastinum and retroperitonium, which share certain characteristics such as DNA methylation, gene expression, marker secretion, and chromosomal alterations9,11. Barkova and colleagues noted that CNS GCT had similar DNA damage response activation patterns to that of gonadal GCT rather than that of CNS-originating tumors which share a common environment15.

Evidence shows that teratomas can arise from other non-progenitor germ cells, suggesting that other GCT subtypes may also have this capability of developing from non-germ cell lines9. Another theory posits that endogenous neural stem cells in the brain are the likely origin of primary CNS GCT since lack of methylation of the SNRPN gene previously linking GCT to progenitor germ cells has been found to be more similar in pattern to human neural stem cells16. Overexpression of a single particular gene, Oct4, was able to stimulate the development of normal progenitor cells in the brain from neural stem cells; the different GCT subtypes seem to be “lineage-related” as evidenced by their recurrence as a different subtype or mixed subtype following treatment 9,17.

Clinical Presentation

While CNS GCT usually arise in the pineal region, they can also occur in supraseller areas, fourth ventricle, basal ganglia, and thalamus; about 5–10% of patients will have tumor present in both pineal and supraseller regions, which happens more frequently in patients with germinomas 6,18. In bifocal disease, it is unknown whether tumor spread occurred or simultaneous tumor development in two different sites took place 6. Phi et al suggested that metastatic spread seemed more likely based on high ventricular seeding rates noted in patients with bifocal CNS GCTs 13. Intracranial germinomas typically arise between 7 and 30 years of age, while NGGCT commonly occur from birth to 20 years17. Symptoms of primary CNS GCTs may include Parinaud syndrome due to hydrocephalus or compression of the tectal plate, ataxia and dysmetria if affecting the superior cerebellar peduncles, diabetes insipidus secondary to either hydrocephalus or additional tumor presence in the suprasellar area affecting the neurophypophysis, and precocious puberty from hormones secreted from certain GCT 6,19. Patients may also experience headache, oculomotor paresis, facial paresis, or hemiparesis20,21.

Assessment & Diagnosis

Diagnosis of CNS GCTs is delayed in approximately 54% of patients due to nonspecific symptoms that are usually present for greater than 6 months before any diagnostic imaging is obtained 5,6,13. GCTs are typically found on computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain 19. Additionally, certain tumor markers may be detected in the serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to aid in diagnosis 19. In 2013, 117 multidisciplinary specialists from 25 countries developed Delphi consensus statements regarding the investigation and management of intracranial GCT, which required at least 70% of votes to support a statement and at least 60% participation of voters. In regards to statements biological work-up, they concluded that serum and CSF alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotrophic hormone (HCG) should be measured to aid in diagnosis3. Yolk sac tumors can secrete AFP; choriocarcinomas can release HCG6. Germinomas have been associated with mild increases in total HCG and may show elevated placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) 6. Elevated AFP and HCG can sometimes occur with immature teratomas22. Pure embryonal carcinomas are not known to secrete any tumor markers; however, they tend to occur mixed with other GCT subtypes, especially yolk sac tumors23. Immunohistochemical markers should also be determined3. Germinomas highly express c-kit/CD117, OCT3/4, and PLAP. Embryonal carcinomas stain strongly for CD30 and CK AE1/3. Yolk sac tumors are typically positive for AFP expression, while choriocarcinomas tend to express HCG3,24. However, normal tumor markers do not definitively rule out the presence of a GCT 25.

CNS GCTs have a tendency to spread through the neuroaxis making extensive metastatic evaluation a necessity and should include MRI with gadolinium of the brain and spine 6. Positive tumors markers can indicate malignant disease with AFP levels greater than 1000ng/ml considered high risk and may require intensified chemotherapy and radiation 5,6 Even with negative or decreasing tumor marker levels, suspected metastatic disease should be explored and treated 26. Without a positive tumor marker result, a biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis3,5,6. If tumor markers are detected in the blood or CSF, then a biopsy is not necessarily required for diagnosis 3,11,27. However although bifocal intracranial tumors with elevated HCG and normal AFP was considered pathonomic for germinomas, Aizer et al found that 21% of their patients with bifocal disease and elevated HCG with normal to mildly elevated AFP were diagnosed with NGGCT, which is of importance to avoid undertreatment28. See Table 2 for a diagnostic summary of primary CNS GCT.

Table 2.

Major diagnostic tools for primary CNS GCT

Germ Cell Tumors (GCT) Serum/CSF tumor markers Immunohistochemical
tumor markers
Imaging Studies
Germinomas HCG, PLAP PLAP, c-kit and OCT3/4
CT brain, MRI brain, MRI spine
Non-germinomatous GCT
teratomas
mature - -
immature HCG, AFP -
embryonal carcinomas - CD30 and CK AE1/3
choriocarcinomas HCG HCG
yolk sac tumors AFP AFP
Germ Cell Tumors (GCT) Serum/CSF tumor markers Immunohistochemical tumor markers Imaging Studies
Germinomas HCG, PLAP PLAP, c-kit and OCT3/4
CT brain, MRI brain, MRI spine
Non-germinomatous GCT
teratomas
mature - -
immature HCG, AFP -
embryonal carcinomas - CD30 and CK AE1/3
choriocarcinomas HCG HCG
yolk sac tumors AFP AFP

HCG=human chorionic gonadotrophic hormone, PLAP=placental alkaline phosphatase, AFP= alpha-fetoprotein

Treatment

The management of primary CNS GCT can vary but typically includes a multimodal treatment plan. Chemotherapy alone without radiation has only proven ineffective resulting in increased relapse rates and worse outcomes 6,25,29,30. Additionally, diabetes insipidus is a risk factor for complications when chemotherapy regimens include cisplatin or ifosfamide based protocols31. Survival significantly increases when patients receive radiation therapy4. Radiation alone has provided excellent survival for patients but can later result in secondary malignancies or neurocognitive and neuroendocrine sequelae, such as decreased processing speed, working memory, and visual memory6,25,32.

Germinomas are virtually curable with radiation therapy alone or more recently neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation 27,32,33. One study noted the outcomes of 24 patients with CNS germinomas treated with lowered radiation doses and a variety of chemotherapy agents, including carboplatin, etoposide, ifosfamide; they found that progression free survival at 5 years was 96% and overall survival was 100% 25. Bouffet and colleagues also found that combining local radiation and chemotherapy for the treatment of non-metastatic germinomas achieved excellent survival rates34. Cyclophosphamide is another agent under investigation for treating GCTs and was noted as a feasible and well-tolerated additional treatment option35. In addition, pre-treatment and post-treatment neuropsychological and neurocognitive testing did not differ significantly at a mean follow-up of 38 months and then 189 months 25. More specifically, treatment of germinomas has developed from high dose craniospinal irradiation (CSI) to now include platinum-based chemotherapy followed by boost radiation to the tumor bed and whole ventricular system3 radiation therapy since most germinomas recur within the ventricular system36. Oral etoposide may also be used palliatively to treat CNS germinomas after conventional chemotherapy and radiation; response to this treatment has been noted for other refractory or recurrent brain tumors in the pediatric population 37.

Only 20–40% of NGGCT are effectively controlled with radiation alone and, therefore, require chemotherapy and radiation in addition to complete surgical resection when possible27,33,38. Chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy has significantly improved survival to 60–70% for patients with NGGCTs 6,39. The most active agents for NGGCT include carboplatin, cisplatin, etoposide, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, taxanes, and vinblastine6. Masutani et el reports effective protocols using carboplatin or cisplatin with etoposide for treating germinomas or intermediated prognosis NGGCTs, but could not control poor prognosis NGGCT even with the use of ifosphamide-cisplatin-etoposide8. Surgical resection alone has not been shown to be sufficient treatment for NGGCTs with the exception of mature teratoma 3,6,20,27. Although similar final outcomes in the United States and Japan, surgery is more frequently included in GCT treatment protocol in Japan than in the United States1. Yet surgical resection after completion of both chemotherapy and radiation occurs more commonly in Japan, while surgery after chemotherapy but followed by radiation typically occurs in the US and Europe3. Immature teratomas typically respond poorly to a cisplatin chemotherapy regimen but, for better outcomes, still require a combination of chemotherapy and radiation along with surgical resection when feasible22.

In the United States, CSI and boost radiation to tumor bed is typically used to treat NGGCT27,28; while Japanese protocols prefer the use of radiation at the tumor site and focal surrounding area for intermediate prognosis NGGCTs but recommends CSI for poor prognosis NGGCTs8,10. The European standard is to treat non-metastatic NGGCT with only local radiation therapy40. One study found that CSI was associated with significantly increased overall survival for poor prognosis NGGCT, suggesting the use of greater than 36 Gy for CSI and 54 Gy or greater radiation to the primary tumor site41. Additionally, Khafaga and colleagues reported that tumor radiation doses greater than 50Gy is preferred for improving outcomes41,42. Several studies have found increased survival with resection of residual tumor after chemotherapy and radiation, suggesting that surgery plays an important role in treating NGGCT particularly with failed radiologic response after initial chemotherapy and radiation36,43. Kochi et al treated 11 patients with NGGCT with chemotherapy and whole brain/ventricular radiation with boost radiation to tumor bed followed by complete excision of any residual tumor; this regimen resulted in a 91% 5-year overall survival43. Yet, Jinguji and colleagues found that an initial treatment strategy including gross total resection either before or after whole-brain radiation and chemotherapy provided effective therapeutic outcomes38. According to the Delphi consensus, treatment of NGGCT should include chemotherapy and radiation with CSI specially used in metastatic disease and resection of residual tumor3.

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) should be considered since it is has been show to provide superior safety, diagnostic efficacy, and decreased morbidity and mortality at treating hydrocephalus and obtaining biopsies of tumors compared with open surgery or external ventricular drainage 9,19. The Delphi consensus agreed that ETV is favored over other surgical interventions when feasible for the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus3. ETV is ideal for non-emergent situations when intracranial blood pressure is well controlled; however, risks to consider include lesion to the fornix and insufficient tissue sample for diagnosis of the tumor, especially for mixed GCT not diagnosed through elevated hormone markers9,19. The benefit of open surgical resection is still debated. While some report no significant differences in survival among any subtypes regardless of extent of surgical resection, others concluded that improved survival occurred for patients specifically with NGGCTs and advised radical removal over biopsy or subtotal resection 4,6. However, germinomas are almost never treated with surgical resection unless residual tumor is persistent after other therapies are utilized 27.

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is another intervention under investigation and may provide benefit in the treatment for GCTs. Although no prospective study has taken place, one retrospective study found the average pineal tumor size decreased by roughly half 6 months after treatment with complete tumor disappearance in 39% of patients after 1 year44. Survival rates for GCTs specifically were 62.4% at 3 years and 54.4% at 5 years with local tumor control rates of 88% at 3 years and 77.27% at 5 years 44. Huang et al observed that patients with NGGCT treated with GKRS experienced increased 5-year survival22. GKRS should be investigated further but appears to be relatively effective as an additional treatment option. See Table 3 for a treatment summary of primary CNS GCT.

Table 3.

Main treatments available for primary CNS GCT

Germ Cell Tumors (GCT) Treatment Options
Germinomas Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, GKRS

Non-germinomatous GCT
teratomas
mature Surgical resection

immature Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgical resection, GKRS, hematopoietic stem cell rescue
embryonal carcinomas
choriocarcinomas
yolk sac tumors

GKRS= Gamma knife radiosurgery

A stem cell treatment is another area of research being explored for treating primary CNS GCT. The idea of using high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR) is meant to eliminate or at least reduce the radiation dose administers to young children with brain tumors to decrease the risk of long term adverse effects45. Tada and colleagues treated 6 patients with NGGCT with ASCR after chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical excision. All patients survived one to seven years after diagnosis and lived with good performance status; however, mild liver dysfunction occurred in all patients along with hearing disturbance in half of patients46. The Delphi consensus agreed that relapsed malignant NGGCT should be treated with high dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell rescue along with surgery and radiation when possible3. Additionally, one case report mentioned the use of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy in which a 22-year old male with a germinoma was given five inoculations, resulting in rapid tumor shrinkage and decreased serum bHCG levels47.

Molecular Biology and Possible Therapeutic Targets

Cytogenic and molecular analyses of pineal tumors have been increasingly pursued for further specification of the different GCT subtypes6. However, this scientific pursuit may be difficult as Schneider et al failed to observe any differences in the genetic profiles of germinomas and NGGCT in 19 patient samples, but the number of chromosomal imbalances was greater in the NGGCT samples48. One case report mentioned a patient who had a germinoma at age 5 but developed a yolk sac tumor 14 years later; it was unclear if or how the tumors were related but could not be distinctly separated since there was location overlap of the tumors 37. Chromosomal analysis found that germinomas and mature teratomas revealed a mean number of 12.8 chromosomal changes (8 gains and 4.8 deletions)5. CNS GCT were also noted to have frequent aberrations of CCND2 (12p13), RB1 (13q14), and PRDM14 (8q13) genes, which play a role in the cyclin/CDK-RB-E2F pathway involved in transcriptional regulation of primordial germ cell specification and development of CNS GCT9,49. Chromosome 4 and 5 losses were reported more commonly in primary CNS GCT than compared to extracranial GCT50. Interestingly, many pineal region GCT were found to have multiple copies of the X chromosomes, which may explain the high incidence of GCT in patients with Klinefelter’s syndrome50. Additionally, Schulte and colleagues found global DNA demethylation in 49 germinoma samples compared to other tumors and normal tissues51.

Furthermore, decreased sensitivity to radiation therapy and chemotherapy along with poor prognosis were noted in 20% of CNS GCT that expressed p21 and 94% of CNS GCT that expressed p539. Somatic alterations in the AKT/mTOR pathway have been noted in intracranial GCT; CNS GCT have also been linked to point mutations of the proto-oncogene KIT, especially among germinomas, which are associated with chromosomal instability6,9,51,52. One study found mutations in the KIT/RAS signaling pathway in over 50% of GCT patients, involving KIT, KRAS, NRAS and CBL, along with alterations in the AKT/mTOR pathway in 19% of GCT patients52. There are at least eight tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting KIT that have been approved, which could potentially benefit patients with CNS GCT hopefully reducing or eliminating the use of radiation and/or chemotherapy; additionally, the therapeutic agent Selumetinib has shown great efficacy in preclinical trials targeting KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer cells52. The use of Dasatinib has been suggested for patients with CNS GCT as it has been an effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor against myeloid leukemia cell lines with CBL mutations; however, one study investigating Dasatinib as a treatment for GCT was unclear of the benefits considering the multimodal treatment plans of the patients52,53.

Prognosis

One study of 373 patients with pineal GCT reported having a 5-year overall survival of 80%, which carried the best survival rates compared to the other pineal tumor types4. Worse prognosis was significantly associated with female sex, age greater than 18 years, NGGCT, and lack of radiation therapy in treatment4. Prognosis is relatively favorable for germinomas showing a greater than 90% 5-year survival and overall survival even with metastasis compared to NGGCT with survival rates ranging from 30–70%6,25,36. Yet one study of 14 patients with NGGCT found that neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy followed by complete resection of residual tumor resulted in a 5-year survival of 93%54. After analyzing 153 CNS GCT cases, Matsutani et al determined 10- and 20-year survival rates patients with pure germinomas as 93% and 81%, 10-year survival rates patients with mature teratomas and immature teratomas as 93% and 71 respectively, and 3-year survival rate of embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, and choriocarcinoma as 27%10. Another study evaluating the long-term outcomes of 455 germinomas and 94 NGGCT reported an 84.1% and 61.9% 20- and 30-year survival rates, respectively, for germinomas, and an 86.7% survival rate for both 20- and 30-year time points for NGGCTs55.

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Primary CNS GCTs are rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies, primarily affecting pediatric population and young adults. The most effective treatment for germinomas seems to be radiation therapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy9. On the other hand, NGGCT appear to be best treated with chemotherapy and radiation followed by gross total resection; complete tumor resection alone is the ideal treatment specifically for mature teratomas (Table 4) 6,9. Cytogenic and molecular analyses are attempting to further specify the different GCT subtypes and are helping to direct the development of distinct therapeutic targets to improve treatment and prognosis (Table 4) 9.

Table 4.

Current treatment recommendations for primary CNS GCT

Germ Cell Tumors (GCT) Recommendations
Germinomas
  • 4 cycles of platinum based chemotherapy, usually including etoposide, ifosfamide, and either carboplatin or cisplatin8,36,56

  • followed by whole ventricular radiotherapy (20-24Gy) and boost radiation (12-16) to tumor bed57,58

  • if CSF metastasis detected, then craniospinal irradiation also administered36,59,60


Non-germinomatous GCT
teratomas
mature
  • complete surgical resection6,22,27


immature
  • 4–6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, usually including carboplatin/cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide, but may include gemcitabine, taxanes, or vinblastine6,27,56; however, immature teratomas do not respond well to cisplatin22

  • more intensive chemotherapy regimens are recommended for worse prognosis NGGCT10

  • craniospinal irradiation (≥36Gy) and boost radiation (≥54Gy) to tumor bed27,28,41 or whole brain/ventricular radiation (24-40Gy) with boost radiation (15-30Gy) to tumor bed43

  • complete surgical resection when possible3,6,28

  • Some suggest best protocol for poor prognosis NGGCT should include simultaneous radiation and chemotherapy followed by resection of remaining tumor3,8

embryonal carcinomas
choriocarcinomas
yolk sac tumors

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NIH K08NS092895 grant (MD).

Footnotes

Disclosure

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.McCarthy BJ, Shibui S, Kayama T, et al. Primary CNS germ cell tumors in Japan and the United States: an analysis of 4 tumor registries. Neuro-oncology. 2012;14(9):1194–1200. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goodwin TL, Sainani K, Fisher PG. Incidence patterns of central nervous system germ cell tumors: a SEER Study. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. 2009;31(8):541–544. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181983af5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Murray MJ, Bartels U, Nishikawa R, Fangusaro J, Matsutani M, Nicholson JC. Consensus on the management of intracranial germ-cell tumours. The Lancet. Oncology. 2015;16(9):e470–e477. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00244-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Al-Hussaini M, Sultan I, Abuirmileh N, Jaradat I, Qaddoumi I. Pineal gland tumors: experience from the SEER database. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2009;94(3):351–358. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9881-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bohrnsen F, Enders C, Ludwig HC, Bruck W, Fuzesi L, Gutenberg A. Common molecularcytogenetic alterations in tumors originating from the pineal region. Oncology letters. 2015;10(3):1853–1857. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dufour C, Guerrini-Rousseau L, Grill J. Central nervous system germ cell tumors: an update. Current opinion in oncology. 2014;26(6):622–626. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Georgiu C, Opincariu I, Cebotaru CL, et al. Intracranial immature teratoma with a primitive neuroectodermal malignant transformation - case report and review of the literature. Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. 2016;57(4):1389–1395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Matsutani M. Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for CNS germ cell tumors--the Japanese experience. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2001;54(3):311–316. doi: 10.1023/a:1012743707883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huang X, Zhang R, Mao Y, Zhou LF, Zhang C. Recent advances in molecular biology and treatment strategies for intracranial germ cell tumors. World journal of pediatrics : WJP. 2016;12(3):275–282. doi: 10.1007/s12519-016-0021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Matsutani M, Sano K, Takakura K, et al. Primary intracranial germ cell tumors: a clinical analysis of 153 histologically verified cases. Journal of neurosurgery. 1997;86(3):446–455. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jorsal T, Rorth M. Intracranial germ cell tumours. A review with special reference to endocrine manifestations. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) 2012;51(1):3–9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.586000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sethi RV, Marino R, Niemierko A, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI, MacDonald SM. Delayed diagnosis in children with intracranial germ cell tumors. The Journal of pediatrics. 2013;163(5):1448–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Phi JH, Kim SK, Lee YA, et al. Latency of intracranial germ cell tumors and diagnosis delay. Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2013;29(10):1871–1881. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2164-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Villano JL, Propp JM, Porter KR, et al. Malignant pineal germ-cell tumors: an analysis of cases from three tumor registries. Neuro-oncology. 2008;10(2):121–130. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2007-054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bartkova J, Hoei-Hansen CE, Krizova K, et al. Patterns of DNA damage response in intracranial germ cell tumors versus glioblastomas reflect cell of origin rather than brain environment: implications for the anti-tumor barrier concept and treatment. Molecular oncology. 2014;8(8):1667–1678. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee SH, Appleby V, Jeyapalan JN, et al. Variable methylation of the imprinted gene, SNRPN, supports a relationship between intracranial germ cell tumours and neural stem cells. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2011;101(3):419–428. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0275-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tan C, Scotting PJ. Stem cell research points the way to the cell of origin for intracranial germ cell tumours. The Journal of pathology. 2013;229(1):4–11. doi: 10.1002/path.4098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kakkar A, Biswas A, Kalyani N, et al. Intracranial germ cell tumors: a multi-institutional experience from three tertiary care centers in India. Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2016 doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3167-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Herrada-Pineda T, Revilla-Pacheco F, Manrique-Guzman S. Endoscopic approach for the treatment of pineal region tumors. Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery. 2015;76(1):8–12. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1330958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cardellicchio S, Farina S, Buccoliero AM, et al. Successful treatment of metastatic betaHCG-secreting germ cell tumor occurring 3 years after total resection of a pineal mature teratoma. Eur J Pediatr. 2014;173(8):1011–1015. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2282-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Raiyawa T, Khorprasert C, Lertbutsayanukul C, et al. Management of intracranial germ cell tumors at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2012;95(10):1327–1334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huang X, Zhang R, Zhou LF. Diagnosis and treatment of intracranial immature teratoma. Pediatric neurosurgery. 2009;45(5):354–360. doi: 10.1159/000257524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Calaminus G, Bamberg M, Harms D, et al. AFP/beta-HCG secreting CNS germ cell tumors: long-term outcome with respect to initial symptoms and primary tumor resection. Results of the cooperative trial MAKEI 89. Neuropediatrics. 2005;36(2):71–77. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-837582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gao Y, Jiang J, Liu Q. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of primary central nervous system germ cell tumors: a 24-years experience. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology. 2014;7(10):6965–6972. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cheng S, Kilday JP, Laperriere N, et al. Outcomes of children with central nervous system germinoma treated with multi-agent chemotherapy followed by reduced radiation. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2016;127(1):173–180. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-2029-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jeong YB, Wang KC, Phi JH, et al. A Case of Nongerminomatous Germ Cell Tumor with Fulminant Course Concomitant Leptomeningeal Metastasis. Brain tumor research and treatment. 2016;4(1):21–25. doi: 10.14791/btrt.2016.4.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Frappaz D, Conter CF, Szathmari A, Valsijevic A, Mottolese C. The management of pineal tumors as a model for a multidisciplinary approach in neuro-oncology. Neuro-Chirurgie. 2015;61(2–3):208–211. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aizer AA, Sethi RV, Hedley-Whyte ET, et al. Bifocal intracranial tumors of nongerminomatous germ cell etiology: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Neuro-oncology. 2013;15(7):955–960. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Robertson PL, Jakacki R, Hukin J, Siffert J, Allen JC. Multimodality therapy for CNS mixed malignant germ cell tumors (MMGCT): results of a phase II multi-institutional study. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2014;118(1):93–100. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1306-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun XF, Zhang F, Zhen ZJ, et al. The clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of 57 children and adolescents with primary central nervous system germ cell tumors. Chinese journal of cancer. 2014;33(8):395–401. doi: 10.5732/cjc.013.10112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Afzal S, Wherrett D, Bartels U, et al. Challenges in management of patients with intracranial germ cell tumor and diabetes insipidus treated with cisplatin and/or ifosfamide based chemotherapy. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2010;97(3):393–399. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-0033-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wong K, Opimo AB, Olch AJ, et al. Re-irradiation of Recurrent Pineal Germ Cell Tumors with Radiosurgery: Report of Two Cases and Review of Literature. Cureus. 2016;8(4):e585. doi: 10.7759/cureus.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Claude L, Faure-Conter C, Frappaz D, Mottolese C, Carrie C. Radiation therapy in pediatric pineal tumors. Neuro-Chirurgie. 2015;61(2–3):212–215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bouffet E, Baranzelli MC, Patte C, et al. Combined treatment modality for intracranial germinomas: results of a multicentre SFOP experience. Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Pediatrique. British journal of cancer. 1999;79(7–8):1199–1204. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Malogolowkin MH, Krailo M, Marina N, Olson T, Frazier AL. Pilot study of cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin, and escalating dose cyclophosphamide therapy for children with high risk germ cell tumors: a report of the children's oncology group (COG) Pediatric blood & cancer. 2013;60(10):1602–1605. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Foo AS, Lim C, Chong DQ, Tan DY, Tham CK. Primary intracranial germ cell tumours: experience of a single South-East Asian institution. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2014;21(10):1761–1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fukuoka K, Yanagisawa T, Suzuki T, et al. Malignant transformation of germinoma 14 years after onset: Favorable efficacy of oral etoposide. Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society. 2015;57(3):483–486. doi: 10.1111/ped.12559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jinguji S, Yoshimura J, Nishiyama K, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with pineal nongerminomatous malignant germ cell tumors treated by radical resection during initial treatment combined with adjuvant therapy. Acta neurochirurgica. 2015;157(12):2175–2183. doi: 10.1007/s00701-015-2614-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kellie SJ, Boyce H, Dunkel IJ, et al. Primary chemotherapy for intracranial nongerminomatous germ cell tumors: results of the second international CNS germ cell study group protocol. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22(5):846–853. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Calaminus G, Frappaz D, Kortmann RD, et al. Outcome of patients with intracranial non-germinomatous germ cell tumors-lessons from the SIOP-CNS-GCT-96 trial. Neuro-oncology. 2017;19(12):1661–1672. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim JW, Kim WC, Cho JH, et al. A multimodal approach including craniospinal irradiation improves the treatment outcome of high-risk intracranial nongerminomatous germ cell tumors. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2012;84(3):625–631. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Khafaga Y, El Weshi A, Nazmy M, et al. Intracranial germ cell tumors: a single-institution experience. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2012;32(4):359–365. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2012.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kochi M, Itoyama Y, Shiraishi S, Kitamura I, Marubayashi T, Ushio Y. Successful treatment of intracranial nongerminomatous malignant germ cell tumors by administering neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy before excision of residual tumors. Journal of neurosurgery. 2003;99(1):106–114. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.1.0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Li W, Zhang B, Kang W, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for pineal region tumors: a study of 147 cases. World journal of surgical oncology. 2015;13:304. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0720-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gardner SL. Application of stem cell transplant for brain tumors. Pediatric transplantation. 2004;8(Suppl 5):28–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-2265.2004.00202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tada T, Takizawa T, Nakazato F, et al. Treatment of intracranial nongerminomatous germ-cell tumor by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell rescue. Journal of neuro-oncology. 1999;44(1):71–76. doi: 10.1023/a:1006395719917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Osada T, Fujimaki T, Takamizawa M, Tsuno NH, Kirino T, Shibata Y. Dendritic cells activate antitumor immunity for malignant intracranial germ cell tumor: a case report. Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 2001;31(8):403–406. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hye076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schneider DT, Zahn S, Sievers S, et al. Molecular genetic analysis of central nervous system germ cell tumors with comparative genomic hybridization. Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 2006;19(6):864–873. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Terashima K, Yu A, Chow WY, et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number alterations and loss of heterozygosity in intracranial germ cell tumors. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2014;61(4):593–600. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Taylor MD, Mainprize TG, Squire JA, Rutka JT. Molecular genetics of pineal region neoplasms. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2001;54(3):219–238. doi: 10.1023/a:1012713506549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schulte SL, Waha A, Steiger B, et al. CNS germinomas are characterized by global demethylation, chromosomal instability and mutational activation of the Kit-, Ras/Raf/Erk- and Akt-pathways. Oncotarget. 2016;7(34):55026–55042. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang L, Yamaguchi S, Burstein MD, et al. Novel somatic and germline mutations in intracranial germ cell tumours. Nature. 2014;511(7508):241–245. doi: 10.1038/nature13296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Osorio DS, Finlay JL, Dhall G, Goldman S, Eisenstat D, Brown RJ. Feasibility of dasatinib in children and adolescents with new or recurrent central nervous system germinoma. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2013;60(9):E100–102. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nakamura H, Makino K, Kochi M, Ushio Y, Kuratsu J. Evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with nongerminomatous malignant germ cell tumors. Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 2011;7(4):431–438. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.PEDS10433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Acharya S, DeWees T, Shinohara ET, Perkins SM. Long-term outcomes and late effects for childhood and young adulthood intracranial germinomas. Neuro-oncology. 2015;17(5):741–746. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Goldman S, Bouffet E, Fisher PG, et al. Phase II Trial Assessing the Ability of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Second-Look Surgery to Eliminate Measurable Disease for Nongerminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Study. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2015;33(22):2464–2471. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.5132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chen YW, Huang PI, Ho DM, et al. Change in treatment strategy for intracranial germinoma: long-term follow-up experience at a single institute. Cancer. 2012;118(10):2752–2762. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Alapetite C, Brisse H, Patte C, et al. Pattern of relapse and outcome of non-metastatic germinoma patients treated with chemotherapy and limited field radiation: the SFOP experience. Neuro-oncology. 2010;12(12):1318–1325. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Calaminus G, Kortmann R, Worch J, et al. SIOP CNS GCT 96: final report of outcome of a prospective, multinational nonrandomized trial for children and adults with intracranial germinoma, comparing craniospinal irradiation alone with chemotherapy followed by focal primary site irradiation for patients with localized disease. Neuro-oncology. 2013;15(6):788–796. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Smith AA, Weng E, Handler M, Foreman NK. Intracranial germ cell tumors: a single institution experience and review of the literature. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2004;68(2):153–159. doi: 10.1023/b:neon.0000027670.96412.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES