Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2018 Sep 10;373(1758):20170366. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0366

Connectome to behaviour: modelling Caenorhabditis elegans at cellular resolution

Stephen D Larson 1,, Padraig Gleeson 1,2, André E X Brown 3,4
PMCID: PMC6158229  PMID: 30201832

Abstract

It has been 30 years since the ‘mind of the worm’ was published in Philosophical Transactions B (White et al. 1986 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 1–340). Predicting Caenorhabditis elegans' behaviour from its wiring diagram has been an enduring challenge since then. This special theme issue of Philosophical Transactions B combines research from neuroscientists, physicists, mathematicians and engineers to discuss advances in neural activity imaging, behaviour quantification and multiscale simulations, and how they are bringing the goal of whole-animal modelling at cellular resolution within reach.

This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Connectome to behaviour: modelling C. elegans at cellular resolution’.

Keywords: nervous system, open data, simulation, Caenorhabditis elegans, connectome, behaviour

1. Introduction

The structure and connectivity of the complete Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system, informally known as the ‘mind of the worm’, was published in 1986 in Philosophical Transactions B [1,2]. This was the first nervous system to be reconstructed to the level of synapses. This publication marked a critical milestone in the worldwide effort to study this nervous system and has been cited more than 3000 times. Recent work has advanced our knowledge of neurotransmitter use [3,4], the extrasynaptic connectome of neuropeptides and monoamines [4] and localization in the worm's 118 neuron classes [6]. Also, techniques such as laser ablation, optogenetics and the analysis of mutants have allowed a wealth of experimental information to be gathered on the effects of modifying neural activity on behaviour.

However, integrating these experimental advances remains a challenge because of the sheer quantity of results and because observations are made at vastly different spatial and temporal scales. Motivated by the challenge of integrating these complex datasets into a better understanding of a whole organism, an international collaboration known as OpenWorm was set up 6 years ago. Its aim is to model and simulate the functioning of C. elegans, including its complete nervous system, behavioural dynamics and eventually every cell in its body, in a computer [7]. This project combines biophysical neuronal modelling, detailed mechanical modelling and behavioural quantification, and applies them to the challenge of predicting the activity of the C. elegans nervous system and its behavioural output. This has been done in an open science manner, making all of the tools and the results of the collaboration open to all on the public Internet. The aim is to generate testable hypotheses and ultimately provide a highly detailed understanding of how ensembles of cells generate patterns of behaviour.

Achieving this aim will only be possible through the merger of experimental and computational approaches to understanding C. elegans physiology, especially of the nervous system [813], and so this special theme issue consists of contributions from both experimental and computational neuroscientists, computer scientists and biophysicists. The contributing disciplines are diverse, but the problem is specific: how does C. elegans' well-specified nervous system function with respect to the whole organism, and how can we use digital modelling and simulation tools to help us understand it?

Natural nervous systems are embodied and interact continuously with their external environments [14], making mechanical models a valuable way to study this relationship. Palyanov et al. have developed Sibernetic [15], a simulation framework that uses smoothed particle hydrodynamics [16] to perform detailed mechanical simulations of a morphologically accurate C. elegans moving through virtual environments. Mechanics is not only important to ‘translate’ neural activity to behaviour, but it also plays an important role in feeding back on neural activity as demonstrated in papers from Denham et al. [17] and Izquierdo & Beer [18], which use neuromechanical models to study how locomotion could be shaped by neural activity. A role for proprioception in body wave propagation does not necessarily resolve the origin of oscillations as described by Wen et al. [19], who review evidence for intrinsic oscillations in rhythm generation in the ventral nerve cord.

A conceptual division of the nervous system into sensory and motor systems, including command interneurons that instruct activity in the nerve code, has been proposed in C. elegans since at least the publication of the connectome. Recent imaging experiments suggest there may be quite a close coupling between behaviour and whole-brain activity and Kaplan et al. suggest in their perspective [20] that a less partitioned, more dynamic picture of the sensory-motor system could make more sense.

Patterns of oscillation lead to locomotion and differences in these patterns have been used to identify dozens of uncoordinated mutants with muscle and nervous system defects. Just as locomotion differences in real worms led to the discovery of nervous system defects, quantifying the behaviour of artificial agents might be used to constrain model parameters. Javer et al. [21] report a new set of features for quantifying behaviour that are useful for distinguishing mutant worms and may also be useful for comparing existing databases of worm behaviour to the output of neural simulations.

Most of the quantitative data on worm behaviour is collected from worms crawling on a smooth agar surface, but in nature they are likely to encounter heterogeneous three-dimensional environments. White [22] hypothesizes that the extra degrees of freedom of the worm's snout are important for navigating these more complex environments and looks to the neural circuitry in the head for insights into possible control mechanisms.

Network analysis of the C. elegans synaptic connectome has drawn significant attention in recent years because of its nearly unique status as a complete organismal nervous system wiring diagram. Branches of mathematics such as graph theory and network science have entered into the domain of neuroscience, and are bringing with them novel quantitative perspectives on the complexity of nervous systems. Along these lines, Lui et al. [23] present results from deriving a candidate functional connectome from Probabilistic Graphical Models built on the structural C. elegans connectome. Towlson et al. [24] present a Network Control-based perspective on predicting functions of the C. elegans connectome, and work to bridge the conceptual gaps between the mathematical theory from which this is derived and the experimental understanding of the neurobiologist.

Not all of the communication between neurons goes through chemical and electrical synapses. There are also ‘wireless’ connections between neurons that release diffusible molecules and those with receptors for those molecules. Chew et al. [25] use a combination of reverse pharmacology, behaviour analysis and genetics to identify a new wireless connection mediated by neuropeptides encoded by nlp-49 and the conserved receptor SEB-3.

Neuronal systems can be modelled using many different approaches and at many levels of detail. Gleeson et al. [26] describe a modelling framework, c302, created specifically for C. elegans, which can generate network models of many different sizes, incorporating varying levels of detail in neurons, muscles and synapses depending on the research question being addressed. Use of standards enables the models to be used on many simulation platforms and in other applications. One of these is Geppetto, described by Cantarelli et al. [27]. This middleware platform has been used by a number of neuroscience initiatives, including OpenWorm and Open Source Brain [28], to make neuroscience models and data more accessible via web browsers.

Models need to be constrained at many levels by experimental data to be of use in making predictions about the behaviour of the biological entities being simulated. Gerkin et al. [29] describe a framework, SciUnit, which is being used in OpenWorm to validate models produced by the project against experimental data on ion channel kinetics, neuronal firing and worm locomotion.

While there is much still to do before a full-scale simulation of C. elegans is completed, the OpenWorm project has already made a number of valuable contributions towards structuring the diverse array of experimental data on C. elegans and facilitating modelling of it. Sarma et al. [30] present an overview of the aims of the project, the work completed to date, how the project interacts with and invites contributions from the community and future plans for the initiative.

The work presented in this special issue covers a broad range of topics, and approaches the problems of understanding C. elegans from many different perspectives. We hope that these contributions will provide a valuable resource for the community working towards a deeper understanding of the neuronal basis for C. elegans behaviour. We also hope that the approach in this issue of placing detailed data-driven theoretical approaches directly alongside data-generating experimental approaches, in service of understanding C. elegans, can provide a model for an even broader discipline of biology.

Data accessibility

This article has no additional data.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed to the writing of the paper.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

P.G. was funded by the Wellcome Trust (101445).

References

  • 1.White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. 1986. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: the mind of a worm. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 1–340. ( 10.1098/rstb.1986.0056) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Emmons SW. 2015. The beginning of connectomics: a commentary on White et al. (1986) ‘The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans’. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140309 ( 10.1098/rstb.2014.0309) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pereira L, et al. 2015. A cellular and regulatory map of the cholinergic nervous system of C. elegans. Elife 4, 299 ( 10.7554/eLife.12432) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gendrel M, Atlas EG, Hobert O. 2016. A cellular and regulatory map of the GABAergic nervous system of C. elegans. Elife 5, 1395 ( 10.7554/eLife.17686) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bentley B, Branicky R, Barnes CL, Chew YL, Yemini E, Bullmore ET, Vértes PE, Schafer WR. 2016. The multilayer connectome of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005283 ( 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005283) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Altun ZF, Hall DH. 2002. WormAtlas. See http://www.wormatlas.org .
  • 7.Szigeti B, et al. 2014. OpenWorm: an open-science approach to modelling Caenorhabditis elegans. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 8, 137 ( 10.3389/fncom.2014.00137) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lockery SR. 2011. The computational worm: spatial orientation and its neuronal basis in C. elegans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 782–790. ( 10.1016/j.conb.2011.06.009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boyle JH, Berri S, Cohen N. 2012. Gait modulation in C. elegans: an integrated neuromechanical model. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 6, 10 ( 10.3389/fncom.2012.00010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jarrell TA, Wang Y, Bloniarz AE, Brittin CA, Xu M, Thomson JN, Albertson DG, Hall DH, Emmons SW. 2012. The connectome of a decision-making neural network. Science 337, 437–444. ( 10.1126/science.1221762) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Izquierdo EJ, Beer RD. 2013. Connecting a connectome to behavior: an ensemble of neuroanatomical models of C. elegans klinotaxis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002890 ( 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002890) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gjorgjieva J, Biron D, Haspel G. 2014. Neurobiology of Caenorhabditis elegans locomotion: where do we stand? Bioscience 64, 476–486. ( 10.1093/biosci/biu058) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Roberts WM, et al. 2016. A stochastic neuronal model predicts random search behaviors at multiple spatial scales in C. elegans. Elife 5, 489 ( 10.7554/eLife.12572) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tytell ED, Holmes P, Cohen AH. 2011. Spikes alone do not behavior make: why neuroscience needs biomechanics. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 816–822. ( 10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Palyanov A, Khayrulin S, Larson SD. 2018. Three-dimensional simulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans body and muscle cells in liquid and gel environments for behavioural analysis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170376 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0376) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Palyanov A, Khayrulin S, Larson SD. 2016. Application of smoothed particle hydrodynamics to modeling mechanisms of biological tissue. Adv. Eng. Softw. 98, 1–11. ( 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.03.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Denham JE, Ranner T, Cohen N. 2018. Signatures of proprioceptive control in Caenorhabditis elegans locomotion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20180208 ( 10.1098/rstb.2018.0208) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Izquierdo EJ, Beer RD. 2018. From head to tail: a neuromechanical model of forward locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170374 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0374) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wen Q, Gao S, Zhen M. 2018. Caenorhabditis elegans excitatory ventral cord motor neurons derive rhythm for body undulation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170370 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0370) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kaplan HS, Nichols ALA, Zimmer M. 2018. Sensorimotor integration in Caenorhabditis elegans: a reappraisal towards dynamic and distributed computations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170371 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0371) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Javer A, Ripoll-Sánchez L, Brown AEX. 2018. Powerful and interpretable behavioural features for quantitative phenotyping of Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170375 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0375) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.White J. 2018. Clues to basis of exploratory behaviour of the C. elegans snout from head somatotropy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170367 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0367) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu H, Kim J, Shlizerman E. 2018. Functional connectomics from neural dynamics: probabilistic graphical models for neuronal network of Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170377 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0377) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Towlson EK, Vértes PE, Yan G, Chew YL, Walker DS, Schafer WR, Barabási A-L. 2018. Caenorhabditis elegans and the network control framework—FAQs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170372 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0372) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chew YL, Grundy LJ, Brown AEX, Beets I, Schafer WR. 2018. Neuropeptides encoded by nlp-49 modulate locomotion, arousal and egg-laying behaviours in Caenorhabditis elegans via the receptor SEB-3. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170368 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0368) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gleeson P, Lung D, Grosu R, Hasani R, Larson SD. 2018. c302: a multi-scale framework for modelling the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170379 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0379) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cantarelli M, Marin B, Quintana A, Earnshaw M, Court R, Gleeson P, Dura-Bernal S, Silver RA, Idili G. 2018. Geppetto: a reusable modular open platform for exploring neuroscience data and models. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170380 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0380) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gleeson P, et al. 2018. Open Source Brain: a collaborative resource for visualizing, analyzing, simulating and developing standardized models of neurons and circuits. bioRxiv, 229484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gerkin RC, Jarvis RJ, Crook SM. 2018. Towards systematic, data-driven validation of a collaborative, multi-scale model of Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170381 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0381) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sarma GP, et al. 2018. OpenWorm: overview and recent advances in integrative biological simulation of Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170382 ( 10.1098/rstb.2017.0382) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This article has no additional data.


Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES