Abstract
The monitoring of intracellular cholesterol homeostasis and trafficking is of great importance because their imbalance leads to many pathologies. Reliable tools for cholesterol detection are in demand. This study presents the design and synthesis of fluorescent probes for cholesterol recognition and demonstrates their selectivity by a variety of methods. The construction of dedicated library of 14 probes was based on heterocyclic (pyridine)-sterol derivatives with various attached fluorophores. The most promising probe, a P1-BODIPY conjugate FP-5, was analysed in detail and showed an intensive labelling of cellular membranes followed by intracellular redistribution into various cholesterol rich organelles and vesicles. FP-5 displayed a stronger signal, with faster kinetics, than the commercial TF-Chol probe. In addition, cells with pharmacologically disrupted cholesterol transport, or with a genetic mutation of cholesterol transporting protein NPC1, exhibited strong and fast FP-5 signal in the endo/lysosomal compartment, co-localizing with filipin staining of cholesterol. Hence, FP-5 has high potential as a new probe for monitoring cholesterol trafficking and its disorders.
Introduction
Cholesterol is a fundamental component of the plasma membrane in animal cells. It controls membrane structural integrity and fluidity, and modulates the activity of various membrane proteins. Membrane physical properties are shaped by interactions of the cholesterol hydroxy group with the polar head groups of membrane phospholipids and sphingolipids, while the bulky steroid and hydrocarbon chain are embedded within the membrane, alongside the nonpolar fatty-acid chains of other lipids.
Cholesterol affects many physiological functions. It reduces the permeability of the plasma membrane to neutral solutes, hydrogen ions, and sodium ions. Within the cell membrane, cholesterol is involved in the formation of invaginated caveolae and clathrin-coated pits, including caveolae-dependent and clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Moreover, cholesterol plays an essential role in the regulation of multiple signalling pathways. It also induces membrane packing in specific microdomains (lipid rafts) of the plasma membrane and provides a platform for a variety of membrane-associated signalling proteins1. Importantly, cholesterol is also a starting material for the synthesis of steroid hormones2, bile acids and vitamin D.
Cholesterol is synthesized de novo from acetyl-CoA in the endoplasmic reticulum or comes from dietary sources3,4. Exogenous cholesterol is acquired through the uptake of low density lipoprotein (LDL) molecules by LDL-receptor mediated endocytosis5. Biosynthesis, as well as uptake of cholesterol from plasma via circulating lipoproteins, is strictly regulated. This regulation involves several feedback loops that ensure the exact amount of cholesterol the cells need for their physiological function. Cholesterol homeostasis in cells is maintained by several mechanisms, including cellular uptake, synthesis, storage and efflux3,4. In addition, an involvement of sterol sensing polytopic membrane protein, Scap, that functions as a molecular machine to control the cholesterol content of membranes in mammalian cells has been demonstrated6. Regarding the distribution, cholesterol moves rapidly between intracellular organelles via vesicular trafficking and non-vesicular pathways3,7. Excess cellular cholesterol is converted to cholesteryl esters by the enzyme acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) or is removed from a cell by cellular cholesterol efflux at the plasma membrane8.
Imbalance in cholesterol homeostasis leads to pathological processes of atherosclerosis, and deregulated cholesterol trafficking is involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases including Niemann-Pick’s disease type C (NPC), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s diseases (PD), and possibly Huntington’s disease (HD)9–11. There is also evidence for involvement in steatohepatitis12,13.
Due to the critical importance of cholesterol in so many processes, it is fundamental to obtain insight into cholesterol trafficking pathways and kinetics, which have not been fully elucidated yet14. Filipin, a fluorescent cholesterol-binding polyene antibiotic, is often used for visualization of cellular cholesterol. However, the paraformaldehyde fixation required for filipin labelling itself compromises the morphology of the plasma membrane, and may reorganize membrane components. It is also possible that some intracellular membranes are not as accessible to filipin as the plasma membrane15 and furthermore, the specificity of filipin for cholesterol is questionable16.
The development of suitable cholesterol probes for analysis in living cells is a great technical challenge and the search for faithful tools is still ongoing. The candidate molecules have to fulfil requirements for very close biophysical and biochemical resemblance with cholesterol, but at the same time, to display good fluorescence properties. Over recent years, a variety of fluorescent and photoreactive cholesterol probes have been developed17. So far, mainly two types of fluorescent cholesterol analogues have been used. First, the intrinsically fluorescent mimics of cholesterol, such as cholestatrienol (CTL) and dehydroergosterol (DHE), which exhibit minimal chemical alteration compared to cholesterol, provide low fluorescence signals in the UV region of the spectrum. Second, synthetic cholesterol analogues labelled with fluorophores such as NBD-cholesterol, Dansyl-cholesterol, BODIPY-cholesterol, and fluorescent PEG-cholesterol are often used for microscopic imaging of sterols17–20. Recently, the click chemistry method based on alkyne cholesterol and oxysterol analogues has emerged as a promising strategy combining benefits of both strong fluorescence and minimal alteration of molecular structure21,22. Alternatively, fluorescently labelled cholesterol-recognizing peptides can be used for imaging of lipid domains on plasma membranes23,24.
Our approach to this topic was the preparation of new probes comprising heterocyclic steroids conjugated with various fluorophores. Herein, we show the impact of the fluorophore itself and its position on the specificity of binding, localization and trafficking inside the cells. The precursor P-1 with BODIPY linked to the pyridyl moiety (FP-5) exhibited high cholesterol- and cholesterol acetate-binding specificity in spectroscopic studies and fast labelling of cholesterol rich compartments in cellular studies.
Results
Molecular design and synthesis of fluorescent probes (FP) with selectivity for sterols
A small-dedicated library of fluorescent probes, recognizing cholesterol and cholesterol esters, was synthesized using a multi-block approach. Initially, the steroid-binding unit (steroid skeleton) was substituted with a heterocycle (pyridine) to generate precursors P1 and P2 (Fig. 1), which were then attached to various fluorophores (Supplementary Fig. S1–S3), giving rise to probes FP-1 – FP-14 (Fig. 1). Importantly, the used precursor P1, is known as abiraterone acetate (brand name Zytiga), which inhibits androgen biosynthesis and is used for treating prostate cancer25, with documented pharmacokinetics26. The fluorophores attached on a precursor P1 via 3-hydroxy group produced fluorescent probes FP-1 ‒ FP-4 or on pyridyl group via quaternization generated probes FP-5 ‒ FP-8 (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. S3A). Alternatively, in probes FP-9 and FP-10, the fluorescent group attachment was realized by substitution of P1 on both sites: 3-OH and pyridyl (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. S3A). Another set of fluorescent probes was generated from precursor P-2, where varieties of fluorophores were attached via quaternization of the pyridyl group: FP-11 ‒ FP-14 (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. S3B). Detailed synthetic protocols and full characterization of all probes are available in Supplementary Information, 1. Chemistry.
The potential of heterocyclic probes for sensing sterol structures and possible mechanisms of molecular interactions was suggested by X-ray analysis of unique cocrystal of a model sterol (lithocholic acid) with the P1 precursor (Supplementary Information, 2. Crystallography, Figs S4, S5). The analysis revealed that the major driving forces for intermolecular bonding of a precursor skeleton and the targeted steroid in an aqueous environment were van der Waals interactions. The hydrophobic effect in aqueous media was a major contributor to cocrystal formation, but possible hydrogen bonding interactions cannot be excluded. The spatial arrangement of the two steroids in cocrystal structure is in an alpha-beta face orientation (Supplementary Figs S4 and S5; Tables S2, S3).
Cellular uptake of fluorescent probes
Fluorescent probes for application in cellular studies must be soluble under physiological conditions, and their molecular structure must favour cellular uptake. Therefore, the screen of novel probes was focused on cellular uptake first. Based on fluorescence recorded in U-2 OS cells at various times during incubation (0.5, 8 and 24 h), probes could be divided into several groups as shown in Table 1, Supplementary Fig. S8: (i) exhibiting none or very poor cellular uptake FP-3, FP-4, FP-9, FP-12 ‒ FP-14, (ii) exhibiting low or mild uptake after longer incubation (8–24 h) FP-1, FP-6, FP-8, (iii) probes precipitating in medium with gradual penetration into cell membranes FP-2, FP-10, FP-11, BODIPY-Cholesterol available under commercial name TopFluor-Cholesterol (TF-Chol), (iv) exhibiting strong and fast uptake FP-5, FP-7. From these results, it can be inferred that the position and structure of fluorophore have a strong impact on cellular uptake. Probes FP-5 – FP-8 with BOPIPY fluorophore connected to pyridyl group via quaternization displayed high cellular uptake, while probes FP-1 ‒ FP-4 with connection via 3-hydroxy group were taken less readily. Furthermore, probes with extended conjugated BODIPY fluorophore (red BOPIPY) FP-3, FP-6, FP8, pyrene FP-4 or coumarin fluorophores FP-1 were internalized less effectively than probes with green BODIPY (FP-2, FP-5, FP-7). In addition, probes FP-9 and FP-10 with the fluorescent group attached on 3-OH and pyridyl sites of P1 and probes FP-11 ‒ FP-14 with fluorophores attached via quaternization of pyridyl group on precursor P-2 formed visible aggregates (Supplementary Fig. S8 shown by arrowheads) and enter cells only slowly or not at all. Commercial TF-Chol probe also had a tendency to form aggregates and penetrated cells slowly.
Table 1.
Probe | Schematic structure | Incubation time | Localization | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 h | 8 h | 24 h | |||
FP-1 | • | • | ER, vesicles | ||
FP-2 | • | • | • | ER, vesicles, Ag | |
FP-3 | n.d. | ||||
FP-4 | n.d. | ||||
FP-5 | ● | ● | ● | PM, ER, (Mi), Ly | |
FP-6 | • | • | • | PM, En/Ly | |
FP-7 | ● | ● | ● | PM,ER, Ly, Mi | |
FP-8 | • | ● | ● | PM, Ly, Cy | |
FP-9 | n.d. | ||||
FP-10 | • | ● | ● | En/Ly, PM, Ag | |
FP-11 | • | • | • | PM, Ly, Ag | |
FP-12 | • | • | En/Ly, Ag | ||
FP-13 | • | En/Ly, Ag | |||
FP-14 | En/Ly, Ag | ||||
TF-Chol | TopFluor-Cholesterol | • | ● | PM, Ly, (ER), Ag |
Fluorescence was evaluated under identical microscopic settings: • weak, • medium, ● strong, n.d. - not detected. Localization: ER - endoplasmic reticulum, PM - plasmatic membrane, Ly - lysosomes, En/Ly - endosome/lysosome compartment, Cy - cytoplasm, Mi - mitochondria, Ag - probe aggregates. Bold indicates intensive labelling in particular compartment(s).
Unique features of the FP-5 probe
The screening of 14 novel fluorescent probes revealed remarkable properties of FP-5; therefore, this probe is described in detail. FP-5 exhibited fast intracellular uptake, and strong staining of cholesterol rich membranes. In addition, UV-VIS analysis revealed a strong interaction of FP-5 with both cholesterol and cholesterol acetate in aqueous medium with 10% DMSO. This interaction was accompanied by obvious spectral changes (Supplementary Information, 3. Spectral analysis, Fig. S6A,B). The absorbance changes were observed at several wavelengths as a function of cholesterol/FP-5 concentration ratio (Supplementary Fig. S6C,D). Association constants (log k) for a 1:1 complex of FP-5:cholesterol and FP-5:cholesterol acetate averaged 5.99 and 6.6, respectively. For 2:1 complexes, the values were 11.3 and 12.8, respectively. These values indicated strong binding between partners (Supplementary Table S4).
Similar results were obtained when stability constants of FP-5 with cholesterol and cholesterol acetate were measured in PBS buffer with 5% of methanol (Supplementary Table S5). The strongest binding of FP-5 with cholesterol was shown for the complex stoichiometry 1:2 (log k = 13.8575). For cholesterol acetate the highest binding affinity was detected for complex stoichiometry 1:1 (log k = 11.2847).
Fluorescence spectroscopy analysis revealed a very high fluorescence intensity of FP-5 itself, which rapidly decreased in the presence of sterols (cholesterol, cholesterol acetate) in the aqueous medium due to the formation of complexes (Supplementary Fig. S6E,F; Table S6). This is consistent with UV-Vis spectral analysis, suggesting effective binding of selected sterol derivatives with probe FP-5.
To further analyse the specificity of FP-5 on the cholesterol-containing model membranes we prepared liposomes (Supplementary Information, p.22) with and without cholesterol (Chol), or cholesterol acetate (Chol-Ac) and tested them for the binding of FP-5. A comparison of UV-Vis and fluorescence spectra of FP-5 for the above-mentioned liposomes is summarized in Supplementary Fig. S7. Panel B shows higher absorbance and fluorescence intensity of FP-5 in liposomes containing cholesterol than in liposomes without cholesterol (panel A). In contrast, liposomes containing cholesterol acetate provided slightly lower FP-5 signals than without it (Supplementary Fig. S7C).
The issue of intracellular stability and metabolism of FP-5 during time was followed at time points 0.5–24 h using different cell-loading protocols, extraction methods, and MS (MALDI, ESI) analyses. In the extracts, beside a mass peak (694.43) corresponding to the original acetylated form of FP-5, a gradual appearance of a peak (652.43) corresponding to the hydroxyl-derivative FP-7 was detected. The quantitative analysis of the intracellular probe conversion in cytoplasmic extracts was performed by LC-MS as described earlier for various BODIPY derivatives27. The MS data indicates that FP-5 inside cells is slowly hydrolysed and hydrolysis becomes more intense after longer incubation, reaching 45% at 24 h (Fig. 2). This observation is consistent with the knowledge of a similar steroid system designed as prodrugs, i.e. abiraterone acetate, which is hydrolysed to active metabolite, abiraterone (hydroxyl-derivative), by enzymatic or chemical hydrolysis.
Another requirement of probe suitability for live monitoring is its compatibility with cell viability and growth. To establish how FP-5 influences cell growth, we monitored cell proliferation in the presence of increasing concentrations of FP-5 in various cell lines by the IncuCyte live-cell imaging system. Proliferation was monitored by analysing cell counts over one week. U-2 OS cells did not show growth inhibition under 10 μM concentration (Supplementary Information, 4. Cellular studies, Fig. S9A), while other cells Panc-1, PaTu, A-2058, and BLM were to some extent inhibited at concentrations of 1–5 μM (Supplementary Fig. S9B–E).
Trafficking and compartmentalization of FP-5 in U-2OS cells
The ability of probe FP-5 to label cells effectively was monitored under various conditions and was compared with TF-Chol. When DMSO solutions of the probes were directly added to the cultivation medium containing 10% FCS, FP-5 labelled cells much faster than TF-Chol; intensive FP-5 fluorescence became apparent within 10–30 min while for TF-Chol, fluorescence was observed only at 24 h (Fig. 3A). Results from labelling of other cell lines with FP-5 (Raw 264.7, CHO-K1, MCF-7, and IEC-6) is available in Supplementary Fig. S10. When the cells were cultivated in lipoprotein-deficient serum (5% LPDS), labelling with both probes was enhanced and accelerated; FP-5 staining became apparent within 5–10 min and TF-Chol after 6 h of incubation (Supplementary Fig. S11A). Moreover, when cells were shortly pulsed by complexes of probes with the non-specific cholesterol carrier methyl β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) (molar ratio 1:10) the fluorescence of both probes was detectable on the cell surface immediately after the pulse (Supplementary Fig. S11B). FP-5, however, displayed more intensive fluorescence than TF-Chol in spite of the 10 times lower concentration used.
Time-lapse microscopic images recorded during and after pulse confirmed very strong association of FP-5 with the plasma membrane (Supplementary Information, 5. Movie Legend and Movie 1). Within 10 minutes, the fluorescent signal appeared on intracellular membranes (Supplementary Information, 5. Movie Legend, Movie 2), followed by increasing accumulation in the endo/lysosomal compartment within 0.5–2 h (Supplementary Information, 5. Movie Legend, Movie 3). Co-localization studies with organelle specific probes confirmed association of FP-5 with endoplasmic reticulum (overlap with ER Tracker Red) after a 10 min chase (Fig. 3B) and increasing accumulation in the endo/lysosomal compartment (overlap with LysoTracker Red) after a 2–6 h chase (Fig. 3C). In some cases, a slight transient signal appeared also in mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. S12A). TF-Chol probe displayed a similar distribution, albeit with slower kinetics (Supplementary Fig. S12B).
To find out the differences and similarities between the labelling of FP-5 and of dehydroergosterol (DHE), which is structurally close to cholesterol, we performed co-localization experiments. Importantly, pulse/chase experiments employing complexes MβCD/DHE together with MβCD/ FP-5 revealed a good co-localization between DHE and FP-5 shortly after pulse (Supplementary Fig. S12C, top right panel). However, after longer incubation (>30 min) FP-5 fluorescence concentrated gradually in lysosomes (see also Fig. 3C), whereas DHE was, even after 24 h incubation, localised diffusely in the cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. S12C, low right panel). Thus, FP-5 in comparison to DHE showed a much faster redistribution into the lysosomal compartment.
Heterocyclic sterol probes can detect cholesterol trafficking disorders
To model the situation in cholesterol trafficking disorders, we used an inhibitor of cholesterol transport U18666 and two model cell lines of human fibroblasts (GM03123E and GM18436) containing different mutations in the cholesterol transporter NPC1. Cells treated for 24–48 h with U18666A were labelled with FP-5, fixed and stained with filipin. Filipin fluorescence co-localized with FP-5 staining (Fig. 4A). FP-5 staining of NPC1 fibroblasts revealed intracellular punctuate structures in much higher abundance than in wild type human fibroblasts (HDFa) (Fig. 4B). These structures were also stained with filipin (Fig. 4C) and were identified as lysosomes according to co-labelling with Rhodamine dextran and LysoTracker Red (Supplementary Fig. S13). Intensive staining of lysosomal structures in NPC1 fibroblasts, with their accumulated cholesterol, was achieved faster with the FP-5 probe (within 2–6 h) than with TF-Chol (within 24 h) as shown in Fig. 4D. Likewise, other probes (FP-2, FP-6, FP-7, FP-8, and FP-10) exhibited ability for effective and fast labelling of cholesterol rich lysosomes in NPC1 cells (Supplementary Fig. S14A). These results show the potential of heterocyclic sterol probes for detecting cholesterol trafficking disorders.
Discussion
Our study shows that heterocyclic sterol probes are suitable tools for cholesterol labelling, fulfilling the main requirements for usage, namely selective recognition, solubility, stability and good cellular uptake.
Generally, molecular recognition in biological systems relies on the existence of specific attractive interactions between two partner molecules. Structure-based drug or probe design seeks to identify and optimize such interactions between ligands and their target molecules. These interactions are given by their three-dimensional structures. The optimization process requires knowledge about the interaction geometries and approximate affinity contributions of attractive interactions, which can be gleaned from crystal structure and associated affinity data.
Since crystallographic data of probe-cholesterol complexes are not available in our hands, we believe that an acquired and unique cocrystal structure (Supplementary Figs S4, S5) of the model sterol (in our case a cholesterol catabolite-lithocholic acid) with the heterocyclic structural model of our probe precursor (P1, abiraterone acetate) may indicate a possible mechanism of molecular recognition under studied conditions.
The probe structure was designed to provide a binding site for the steroid in question, in combination with pyridinium salt, ensuring sufficient aqueous solubility. Verification of our design validity came from spectroscopic studies as well as from X-ray crystallography. The van der Waals interactions were identified as main driving forces for crystal formation in aqueous environment, as cocrystal was obtained from methanol – water solution by slow evaporation. We assume that a similar binding mode takes place between at least some of our probes and sterol targets (see Supplementary Figs S4 and S5). The rational design of probes used a combination of a) lipophilic part (steroid skeleton) with b) quaternary ammonium salt (giving expected selectivity and solubility) and c) fluorescent reporter, thereby creating unique fluorescent probes (Supplementary Figs S1–S3). The quaternary pyridinium group was a point for fluorophore attachment. Importantly, the pyridyl group on the D ring (precursor P1, probes FP-1 ‒ FP-8) seems to favour cellular uptake of probes in contrast to fused pyridine group on the A ring (precursor P2, probes FP-11 ‒ FP-14). The attachment of fluorescent groups on both sites of P1 (via 3-OH and pyridyl) resulted in insignificant cell fluorescence (FP-9) or aggregation of probe with slow cellular penetrance and fluorescence appearance after 8–24 h incubation (FP-10) (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. S8). The variability in cellular uptake of probes, based on the same precursors, reflects the influence of other factors, such as the type of attached fluorophore and the presence of either acetyl or hydroxy groups on ring A. The probes FP-5 and FP-7 with BODIPY displayed fast and bright cellular fluorescence, while further extension of the fluorophore (increasing size) to generate a red BODIPY (FP-6, FP-8) led to slower uptake and lower fluorescence. The presence of acetyl or hydroxyl group in FP-5 and FP-7, respectively, affects lipophilicity and consequently the kinetics and trafficking of probes. Generally, we observed a correlation between lipophilicity of compounds and their cellular uptake, e.g. highly lipophilic FP-3, FP-4, FP-9, and FP-14 probes did not enter cells, while less lipophilic FP-5 – FP-8 effectively labelled cells (see Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1, Fig. S8). Notably, FP-5 displayed a durable association with cellular membrane structures whereas FP-7, with its hydroxyl group, displayed a markedly shorter association with plasmatic and intracellular membranes, and profound labelling of lysosomes (Supplementary Fig. S8). Thus, it can be concluded that a delicate tuning of lipophilicity, which can be increased by acetyl group is required for optimal probe properties. On the other hand, fast labelling of lysosomes by FP-7 may be an advantage for detecting lysosomal storage disorders, as we observed very intensive staining of NPC1 fibroblasts using this probe within 2 h (Supplementary Fig. S14B).
The favourable properties of FP-5 for monitoring of sterol trafficking emerged from comparison with the commercial probes, TF-Chol and DHE. The application of FP-5 directly to the growth medium resulted in the effective labelling of cells within 30 min, while for TF-Chol, intracellular fluorescence was only visible after 24 h incubation (Fig. 3A). This demonstrates that FP-5 diffuses from solvent to cells quickly, whereas the hydrophobic TF-Chol, having a propensity to aggregate in an aqueous environment, equilibrates more slowly with intracellular membranes28,29. Similar aggregates formation and slow labelling occurred also with some of our probes (FP-2, FP-10, FP-11, and FP-12). Moreover, it is known that TF-Chol is readily effluxed from cells and prolonged incubation in the presence of efflux acceptors like apolipoprotein A-I may significantly reduce the signal intensity28. Accordingly, in their absence in medium supplemented with the lipoprotein-deprived serum (LPDS), we observed a significant fluorescence already after 6 h (Supplementary Fig. S11A). A major improvement of TF-Chol signal was achieved using the artificial carrier MβCD in LPDS conditions. This labelling method yielded a robust and uniform plasma membrane signal, which is consistent with reports of others19,28,30. These conditions also increased and accelerated FP-5 signal (Supplementary Fig. S11B). Similarly, a DHE signal was achieved only when complexed with MβCD30. We summarize that FP-5 shows better uptake than commercial probes, which in order to effectively label cells mostly require artificial carriers and the absence of efflux acceptors. Although an extensive comparative study with other fluorescently labelled cholesterol analogues and their performance in various cellular assays, similar to work of Sezgin18, is still needed, the applicability of FP-5 is evident.
Time-lapse experiments revealed a robust and dynamic plasma membrane signal of FP-5, during and after the labelling pulse, with fast movement along membranes and extensive influx and efflux, (Supplementary Movies 1–3). After the pulse, an increasing intracellular signal displayed transient co-localization with ER Tracker. ER is the organelle where most steps of cholesterol synthesis take place, but cholesterol is rapidly transferred from the ER to other organelles via vesicular trafficking and non-vesicular pathways4. There are reports showing existence of endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–plasma membrane (PM) junctions as contact sites between the ER and the PM31,32. These membrane contact sites (MCSs) are domains where two membranes come to close proximity, typically less than 30 nm, that favour exchange between the two organelles. They are established and maintained in durable or transient states by tethering structures, which keep the two membranes in proximity without fusion. The ER extensive network is involved in the most MCSs within the cell, including mitochondria, lysosomes, lipid droplets, Golgi apparatus, and endosomes33,34. It is possible that the FP-5 transport from PM into ER and subsequently to lysosomes is mediated through MSC by the non-vesicular pathway. Such an interpretation is supported by reports describing MCSs involvement in PM-ER sterol transport35,36. However, the involvement of vesicular transport cannot be ruled out.
Fast labelling of NPC1 fibroblasts with defective cholesterol trafficking37–39 in normal cultivation medium is another advantage of FP-5 (Fig. 5B). A strong and uniform signal in the lysosomal compartment appeared within 2 h, while a TF-Chol signal took 24 h to develop (Fig. 4D). Notably, when NPC1 cells were labelled with FP-7, an early bright signal appeared in mitochondria (30 min) before prevailing in the endolysosomal compartment (cca 2 h) (Supplementary Fig. S14B). A recent report indicates the possibility of lysosomal-mitochondrial liaisons leading to accumulation of specific lipids and cholesterol in mitochondria. Such accumulation results in mitochondrial dysfunction and defective antioxidant defence, contributing to Niemann-Pick disease progression40. In line with this, our observation suggests an attractive possibility that FP-7 might be a promising tool for studying lysosomal and mitochondrial interactions and sterol trafficking in this disease. In addition, some other heterocyclic sterol probes (FP-2, FP-6, FP-8 and FP-10) label NPC1 cells effectively within 6 h, hence they can be used for detection of lysosomal storage disorders (Supplementary Fig. S14A).
In summary, this study demonstrates FP-5 as a unique probe providing uniform and fast labelling of plasmatic and intracellular membranes, transferring later to its ultimate destination, the lysosomes. Figure 5 summarizes the schematic visualization of dynamic sterol transport and intracellular trafficking in a U-2 OS cell (A), and pathological accumulation in a NPC1 fibroblast (B). The analogical scheme for TF-Chol signal distribution with much slower kinetics than for FP-5 is shown in Supplementary Fig. S15. A preliminary comparison with two commercial probes, TF-Chol and DHE highlights advantages of the described novel class of heterocyclic sterol probes, applicable for monitoring of sterol trafficking and its pathologies.
Materials and Methods
Reagents and Materials
Solvents were purchased from PENTA, and steroids from Steraloids. The purchased material was used without further purification or distillation. TopFluor-Cholesterol (TF-Chol) was from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc., Rhodamine-Dextran, LysoTracker® Red DND-99, and ER-Tracker™ Red were from Molecular Probes (Life Technologies). Dehydroergosterol (DHE), methyl-β-cyclodextrin, LPDS (lipoprotein deficient serum) and Filipin were from Sigma, inhibitor U-18666A from ENZO Life Sciences and media RMPI, EMEM and supplements were from Life Technologies.
Chemical Synthesis and compound characterization
Synthesis of compounds and their characterization is included in Supplementary Information 1. Chemistry.
Cell Lines and Cell Culture
U-2 OS cells (obtained from ATCC) were cultivated in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Life Technologies), sodium pyruvate, 2 mM glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin (Sigma), 20 mM HEPES, and glucose (4 mg/ml). NPC1 fibroblasts (obtained from Coriell Repository) were maintained in EMEM medium supplemented with NEAA (nonessential amino acids) (Life Technologies), 2 mM glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin (Sigma), and 15% FCS. HDFa fibroblasts were grown in Medium 106 with Low Serum Growth Supplement (LSGS) as recommended by manufacturer (Life Technologies).
Labelling of cells with fluorescent probes and organelle markers
Solutions of probes were prepared in DMSO and applied to cultivation medium (200 nM–1 μM final concentration) supplemented with either 10% FBS or 5% LPDS. To facilitate cellular uptake, probes were complexed with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) at a molar ratio of 1:10 (probe:cyclodextrin) as described before for BODIPY-cholesterol28, sonicated 2 × 3 min and centrifuged for 5 min. The complex was applied to cells for 2 min at room temperature. FP-5 was used at a concentration 0.5–2 μg/mL while TF-Chol at 20 μg/ml.
For double-labelling cells with DHE and FP-5 cholesterol analogues, analogues were loaded on methyl-β-cyclodextrin30. The concentrations of DHE and FP-5 used for preparation of the cyclodextrin (CD) complexes were 3 mM and 1.5 μM, respectively. Thus, DHE was in 2000-fold excess to FP-5. Cells were labelled with DHE/FP-5/MβCD for 2 min at room temperature, washed and chased for 10 min, 4 and 24 h at 37 °C.
For co-localization studies, cells were incubated with probes and subsequently loaded with organelle markers LysoTrackerTM Red DND-99 (80 nM), or ER-Tracker™ Red (1 µM) (Molecular Probes) for 30 min at 37 °C in complete medium. Rhodamine-dextran (1 mg/mL) was supplied overnight in normal growth medium. For filipin co-staining, cells were, after labelling with probes, fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde and then labelled with filipin (50 μg/ml) for 30 min15.
Fluorescence Microscopy
Cells grown on coverslips in 35-mm Petri dishes were incubated with the corresponding probe for indicated time in FluoroBrightTM DMEM medium without phenol red. Subsequently were washed and observed alive using a fluorescence microscope DM IRB (Leica) with filter cube I3 (excitation filter BP 450–490 nm and long pass filter LP 515 nm for emission) for green fluorescence. Filter cube N2.1 (excitation filter BP 515–560 nm and long pass filter LP 590 nm for emission) was used for red fluorescence, and filter cube A (excitation filter BP 340–380 nm and long pass filter LP 425 nm for emission) for blue fluorescence. The fluorescence images were acquired by a DFC 480 camera using a 63× oil immersion objective.
Time-lapse microscopy
For the time-lapse experiments, U-2 OS cells were plated on 35-mm glass bottom dishes (InVitro Scientific) coated with poly-L-lysine. The dish was placed within a humidified chamber (37 °C, 5% CO2) on the microscope stage for 30 min. Cells were then pulsed with FP-5/MβCD for 2 min (final concentration of FP-5 was 0.5 μM), washed and then the fluorescence signal was acquired. The acquisition was performed on an OMX Delta Vision microscope in wide-field mode; microscope settings: objective 60× /1.42NA PlanApo N, excitation filter 477/32, and emission filter 528/48. Images were acquired on a PCO.EDGE sCMOS camera; readout speeds 95 MHz. Frame rate interval for acquisition was 10 seconds.
Determination of FP-5 intracellular stability
U-2 OS cells (3 × 105) were seeded on 35-mm Petri dishes in complete culture media (RPMI with 10% FBS) and incubated for 24 h. The attached cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated in culture medium supplemented by 5% LPDS in the presence of FP-5 (1 µM final concentration) at 37 °C for 0.5, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours. The culture medium was removed and the cells were lysed in 0.5 mL lysis buffer (20 mM TRIS, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% Triton TX100) for 30 minutes, pooled in the tube and sonicated 3 × 5 s with a probe tip sonicator. Then we performed two extractions with dichlormethane:acetonitrile 90:10, and the organic phase was evaporated and the samples were subjected to MS (MALDI, ESI) analysis and measured on Bruker solariX XR instrument.
Alternatively, cells were pulsed for 2 min with 2 μg of FP-5 complexed with MβCD at a molar ratio of 1:10 (probe:cyclodextrin), washed and incubated in medium supplemented by 5% LPDS for various time points. The harvest and sample preparation were done as described above, with the exception that chloroform was used for extraction.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Trevor Epp for review of the manuscript and Tereza Mikulášová for drawing schematic figures. This work was supported by The Czech Science Foundation (grant 17-02836S), by the programs of Ministry of Education Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (MEYS) LO1220, LM2015063, and Operational Program Prague Competitiveness financed from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF OPPC) (CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24510 and CZ.2.16/3.1.00/28026. We acknowledge the Light Microscopy Core Facility, IMG CAS, Prague, Czech Republic supported by MEYS (LM2015062), OPPC (CZ.2.16/3.1.00/21547) and (LO1419) for their support presented herein.
Author Contributions
J.K. proposed and conducted the experiments, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. M.J. synthetized and characterized the probes and helped with manuscript preparation. L.K. performed liposome preparation, spectral analysis and proliferation analysis. B.D. and Z.R. measured NMR and HMRS spectra. M.D. performed X-ray analysis. P.D. evaluated compounds lipophilicity. I.N. helped with time-lapse experiments. M.K. contributed to the writing and data interpretation. P.B. and V.K. designed research and analyzed data. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Data Availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-32776-6.
References
- 1.Garcia-Ruiz C, et al. Mitochondrial cholesterol in health and disease. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24:117–132. doi: 10.14670/HH-24.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hu J, Zhang Z, Shen WJ, Azhar S. Cellular cholesterol delivery, intracellular processing and utilization for biosynthesis of steroid hormones. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2010;7:47. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-7-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ikonen E. Cellular cholesterol trafficking and compartmentalization. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:125–138. doi: 10.1038/nrm2336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Solanko KA, Modzel M, Solanko LM. & Wustner, D. Fluorescent Sterols and Cholesteryl Esters as Probes for Intracellular Cholesterol Transport. Lipid Insights. 2015;8:95–114. doi: 10.4137/LPI.S31617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goldstein JL, Brown MS. The LDL receptor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:431–438. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brown, M. S., Radhakrishnan, A. & Goldstein, J. L. Retrospective on Cholesterol Homeostasis: The Central Role of Scap. Annu Rev Biochem 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011852 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Maxfield FR, Wustner D. Intracellular cholesterol transport. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:891–898. doi: 10.1172/JCI16500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chang TY, Chang CC, Ohgami N, Yamauchi Y. Cholesterol sensing, trafficking, and esterification. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:129–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu JP, et al. Cholesterol involvement in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2010;43:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Neefjes J, van der Kant R. Stuck in traffic: an emerging theme in diseases of the nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37:66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arenas F, Garcia-Ruiz C, Fernandez-Checa JC. Intracellular Cholesterol Trafficking and Impact in Neurodegeneration. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:382. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M. Cholesterol metabolism and the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Prog Lipid Res. 2013;52:175–191. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2012.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mari M, et al. Mitochondrial free cholesterol loading sensitizes to TNF- and Fas-mediated steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2006;4:185–198. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maxfield FR, Wustner D. Analysis of cholesterol trafficking with fluorescent probes. Methods Cell Biol. 2012;108:367–393. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386487-1.00017-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mukherjee S, Zha X, Tabas I, Maxfield FR. Cholesterol distribution in living cells: fluorescence imaging using dehydroergosterol as a fluorescent cholesterol analog. Biophys J. 1998;75:1915–1925. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77632-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Arthur JR, Heinecke KA, Seyfried TN. Filipin recognizes both GM1 and cholesterol in GM1 gangliosidosis mouse brain. J Lipid Res. 2011;52:1345–1351. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M012633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gimpl G, Gehrig-Burger K. Probes for studying cholesterol binding and cell biology. Steroids. 2011;76:216–231. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sezgin E, et al. A comparative study on fluorescent cholesterol analogs as versatile cellular reporters. J Lipid Res. 2016;57:299–309. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M065326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wustner D, Lund FW, Rohrl C, Stangl H. Potential of BODIPY-cholesterol for analysis of cholesterol transport and diffusion in living cells. Chem Phys Lipids. 2016;194:12–28. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Modzel M, Lund FW, Wustner D. Synthesis and Live-Cell Imaging of Fluorescent Sterols for Analysis of Intracellular Cholesterol Transport. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1583:111–140. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6875-6_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jao CY, et al. Bioorthogonal probes for imaging sterols in cells. Chembiochem. 2015;16:611–617. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hofmann K, et al. A novel alkyne cholesterol to trace cellular cholesterol metabolism and localization. J Lipid Res. 2014;55:583–591. doi: 10.1194/jlr.D044727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mizuno H, et al. Fluorescent probes for superresolution imaging of lipid domains on the plasma membrane. Chem Sci. 2011;2:1548–1553. doi: 10.1039/c1sc00169h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mukai M, Glover KJ, Regen SL. Evidence for Surface Recognition by a Cholesterol-Recognition Peptide. Biophys J. 2016;110:2577–2580. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Scott LJ. Abiraterone Acetate: A Review in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostrate Cancer. Drugs. 2017;77:1565–1576. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0799-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Han CS, Patel R, Kim IY. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy of abiraterone acetate for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Expert Opin Drug Met. 2015;11:967–975. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2015.1041918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ceulemans M, Nuyts K, De Borggraeve WM, Parac-Vogt TN. Gadolinium(III)-DOTA Complex Functionalized with BODIPY as a Potential Bimodal Contrast Agent for MRI and Optical Imaging. Inorganics. 2015;3:516–533. doi: 10.3390/inorganics3040516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Holtta-Vuori M, et al. BODIPY-cholesterol: a new tool to visualize sterol trafficking in living cells and organisms. Traffic. 2008;9:1839–1849. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00801.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Holtta-Vuori M, Sezgin E, Eggeling C, Ikonen E. Use of BODIPY-Cholesterol (TF-Chol) for Visualizing Lysosomal Cholesterol Accumulation. Traffic. 2016;17:1054–1057. doi: 10.1111/tra.12414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wustner D, et al. Quantitative assessment of sterol traffic in living cells by dual labeling with dehydroergosterol and BODIPY-cholesterol. Chem Phys Lipids. 2011;164:221–235. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Malmersjo S, Meyer T. Inside-out connections: the ER meets the plasma membrane. Cell. 2013;153:1423–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chang CL, Chen YJ, Liou J. ER-plasma membrane junctions: Why and how do we study them? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017;1864:1494–1506. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Helle SC, et al. Organization and function of membrane contact sites. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:2526–2541. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.English AR, Voeltz GK. Endoplasmic reticulum structure and interconnections with other organelles. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a013227. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a013227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jansen M, et al. Role of ORPs in sterol transport from plasma membrane to ER and lipid droplets in mammalian cells. Traffic. 2011;12:218–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sere Y, Johansen J, Beh C, Menon A. Role of membrane contact sites in PM-ER sterol transport (606.7) FASEB J. 2014;28(S606):607. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ikonen E, Holtta-Vuori M. Cellular pathology of Niemann-Pick type C disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004;15:445–454. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lloyd-Evans E, et al. Niemann-Pick disease type C1 is a sphingosine storage disease that causes deregulation of lysosomal calcium. Nat Med. 2008;14:1247–1255. doi: 10.1038/nm.1876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Peake KB, Vance JE. Defective cholesterol trafficking in Niemann-Pick C-deficient cells. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:2731–2739. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.04.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Torres S, et al. Lysosomal and Mitochondrial Liaisons in Niemann-Pick Disease. Front Physiol. 2017;8:982. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).