Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Sage Choice logoLink to Sage Choice
. 2018 Jun 27;10(2):119–126. doi: 10.5301/JABFM.2012.9706

Preparation and Characterization of Shape Memory Polymer Scaffolds via Solvent Casting/Particulate Leaching

Luigi de Nardo 1, Serena Bertoldi 2, Alberto Cigada 1, Maria Cristina Tanzi 2, Håvard Jostein Haugen 3, Silvia Farè 2,✉
PMCID: PMC6159812  PMID: 23015372

Purpose

Porous Shape Memory Polymers (SMPs) are ideal candidates for the fabrication of defect fillers, able to support tissue regeneration via minimally invasive approaches. In this regard, control of pore size, shape and interconnection is required to achieve adequate nutrient transport and cell ingrowth. Here, we assessed the feasibility of the preparation of SMP porous structures and characterized their chemico-physical properties and in vitro cell response.

Methods

SMP scaffolds were obtained via solvent casting/particulate leaching of gelatin microspheres, prepared via oil/water emulsion. A solution of commercial polyether-urethane (MM-4520, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries) was cast on compacted microspheres and leached-off after polymer solvent evaporation. The obtained structures were characterized in terms of morphology (SEM and micro-CT), thermo-mechanical properties (DMTA), shape recovery behavior in compression mode, and in vitro cytocompatibility (MG63 Osteoblast-like cell line).

Results

The fabrication process enabled easy control of scaffold morphology, pore size, and pore shape by varying the gelatin microsphere morphology. Homogeneous spherical and interconnected pores have been achieved together with the preservation of shape memory ability, with recovery rate up to 90%. Regardless of pore dimensions, MG63 cells were observed adhering and spreading onto the inner surface of the scaffolds obtained for up to seven days of static in vitro tests.

Conclusions

A new class of SMP porous structures has been obtained and tested in vitro: according to these preliminary results reported, SMP scaffolds can be further exploited in the design of a new class of implantable devices.

References

  • 1.Fuchs KH. Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 154–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li F, Zhang X, Hou J, et al. Studies on thermally stimulated shape memory effect of segmented polyurethanes. J Appl Polym Sci 1997; 64: 1511–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lendlein A, Kelch S. Shape-memory polymers. Angew Chem Int Edit 2002; 41: 2034–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lendlein A, Kratz K, Kelch S. Smart implant materials. Med Device technol 2005; 16: 12–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gil FJ, Planell JA. Shape memory alloys for medical applications. P I Mech Eng H 1998; 212: 473–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Michiardi A, Aparicio C, Planell JA, Gil FJ. New oxidation treatment of NiTi shape memory alloys to obtain Ni-free surfaces and to improve biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res B 2006; 77: 249–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yahia LH. Shape memory implants. Springer, Hong Kong, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Nardo L, Alberti R, Cigada A, Yahia L, Tanzi MC, Fare S. Shape memory polymer foams for cerebral aneurysm reparation: Effects of plasma sterilization on physical properties and cytocompatibility. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 1508–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Metcalfe A, Desfaits AC, Salazkin I, Yahia L, Sokolowski WM, Raymond J. Cold hibernated elastic memory foams for endovascular interventions. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 491–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sokolowski W, Metcalfe A, Hayashi S, Yahia LH, Raymond J. Medical applications of shape memory polymers. Biomed Mater 2007; 2: S23–S27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lendlein A, Behl M, Hiebl B, Wischke C. Shape-memory polymers as a technology platform for biomedical applications. Expert Rev Med Devic 2010; 7: 357–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mather PT, Luo X, Rousseau IA. Shape Memory Polymer Research. Ann Rev Mater Res 2009; 39: 445–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ratna D, Karger-Kocsis J. Recent advances in shape memory polymers and composites: a review. J Mater Sci 2008; 43: 254–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Small W, Singhal P, Wilson TS, Maitland DJ. Biomedical applications of thermally activated shape memory polymers. J Mater Chem 2010; 20: 3356–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.De Nardo L, Moscatelli M, Silvi F, Tanzi M, Yahia LH, Farè S. Chemico-physical modifications induced by plasma and ozone sterilizations on shape memory polyurethane foams. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21: 2067–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tanzi MC, Bozzini S, Candiani G, et al. Trends in biomedical engineering: focus on Smart Bio-Materials and Drug Delivery. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2011; 9: 87–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Farè S, Valtulina V, Petrini P, et al. In vitro interaction of human fibroblasts and platelets with a shape-memory polyurethane. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 73: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang W, Zhao Y, Wang C, et al. Thermo/chemo-responsive shape memory effect in polymers: a sketch of working mechanisms, fundamentals and optimization. J Polym Res 2012; 19: 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lendlein A, Kelch S. Degradable, multifunctional polymeric biomaterials with shape-memory. Mater Sci Forum 2005; 492–493: 219–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.De Nardo L, Bertoldi S, Tanzi MC, Haugen HJ, Faré S. Shape memory polymer cellular solid design for medical applications. Smart Mater Struct 2011; 20: 035004. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Witold S, Annick M, Shunichi H, L'Hocine Y, Jean R. Medical applications of shape memory polymers. Biomedical Materials 2007; 2: S23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zheng X, Zhou S, Li X, Weng J. Shape memory properties of poly(d,l-lactide)/hydroxyapatite composites. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4288–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Draghi L, Resta S, Pirozzolo MG, Tanzi MC. Microspheres leaching for scaffold porosity control. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 1093–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moore MJ, Jabbari E, Ritman EL, et al. Quantitative analysis of interconnectivity of porous biodegradable scaffolds with micro-computed tomography. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 71A: 258–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yakacki CM, Shandas R, Lanning C, Rech B, Eckstein A, Gall K. Unconstrained recovery characterization of shape-memory polymer networks for cardiovascular applications. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2255–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lattanzi L, Raney JR, De Nardo L, Misra A, Daraio C. Nonlinear viscoelasticity of freestanding and polymer-anchored vertically aligned carbon nanotube foams. J Appl Phys 2012; 111: 074314. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Misra A, Raney JR, De Nardo L, Craig AE, Daraio C. Synthesis and Characterization of Carbon Nanotube-Polymer Multilayer Structures. Acs Nano 2011; 5: 7713–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ristori S, Ciani L, Candiani G, et al. Complexing a small interfering RNA with divalent cationic surfactants. Soft Matter 2012;8: 749–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pezzoli D, Olimpieri F, Malloggi C, Bertini S, Volonterio A, Candiani G. Chitosan-Graft-Branched Polyethylenimine Copolymers: Influence of Degree of Grafting on Transfection Behavior. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e34711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yang WS, Fuso L, Biamino S, et al. Fabrication of short carbon fibre reinforced SiC multilayer composites by tape casting. Ceram Int 2012; 38: 1011–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pavese M, Fino P, Badini C, Ortona A, Marino G. HfB2/SiC as a protective coating for 2D Cf/SiC composites: Effect of high temperature oxidation on mechanical properties. Surf Coat Tech 2008; 202: 2059–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tobushi H, Okumura K, Endo M, Hayashi S. Thermomechanical Properties of Polyurethane-Shape Memory Polymer Foam. J Intel Mat Syst Str 2001; 12: 283–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sokolowski WM, Chmielewski AB, Hayashi S, Yamada T. Cold hibernated elastic memory (CHEM) self-deployable structures. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 1999; 3669: 179–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hayashi S, Fujimura H. Shape Memory Polymer Foam. US Patent Specification 1991: 5,049,591. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.De Nardo L, De Cicco S, Jovenitti M, Tanzi MC, Fare S. Shape memory polymer porous structures for mini-invasive surgical procedures. Proceedings of 8th Biennial ASME Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, ESDA2006, Torino, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee SH, Jang MK, Kim SH, Kim BK. Shape memory effects of molded flexible polyurethane foam. Smart Mater Struct 2007; 16: 2486–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Variola F, Vetrone F, Richert L, et al. Improving Biocompatibitity of Implantable Metals by Nanoscale Modification of Surfaces: An Overview of Strategies, Fabrication Methods, and Challenges. Small 2009; 5: 996–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xu SG, Zhang P, Zhu GM, Jiang YM. Effect of Biodegradable Shape-Memory Polymers on Proliferation of 3T3 Cells. J Mater Eng Perform 2011; 20: 807–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rüder C, Sauter T, Becker T, et al. Viability, proliferation and adhesion of smooth muscle cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells on electrospun polymer scaffolds. Clin Hemorheol Micro 2012; 50: 101–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Farè S, Valtulina V, Petrini P, et al. In vitro interaction of human fibroblasts and platelets with a shape-memory polyurethane. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 73A: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES