Abstract
Objectives
Caregivers of children with cerebral palsy (CP) have to spend a long time to take care of their children. We aimed to develop a user-friendly web-based intervention for training parents of children with CP and evaluate the process of development using modified CeHRes roadmap.
Materials & Methods
The study was conducted from September 2016 to September 2017 in Tehran, Iran. We did it in four main steps including determining the needs of users, content development, design, operational development and evaluation.
Results
The website for caregiver training provided nine general topics and had the possibility that the caregivers could determine their educational priorities. Moreover, the users could share their experiences with other users and could ask questions from an expert. Ten caregivers completed a usability questionnaire after four weeks of use. The average score of 70.5 out of 100 was shown among caregivers. The average score of all statements was above three on a Likert scale between 1 and 5.
Conclusion
The website has the possibilities including registering caregivers of children with CP, the possibility to confirm registration with an SMS and the possibility to determine the caregiver educational priorities. It has the usability for training caregivers of children with CP.
Key Words: Web-based intervention, Cerebral palsy, caregiver
Introduction
Cerebral Palsy (CP) describes a group of permanent disorders of the development and posture, causing activity limitation, attributed to non-progressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain (1). Children with CP are more dependent on their caregivers to perform their Activities of Daily Living (ADL). As a result, parents of these children have to spend a long time to feed, bathe and clothe a child with the low capability of mobility (2). Therefore, taking care of these children with disability is time-consuming and is a source of stress for their caregivers. Dealing with stressful situations has a negative impact on caregivers’ quality of life. Taking care of a child with CP affects physical and social welfare, freedom and independence, comfort and financial stability of the family (3, 4).
Majority of caregivers of children with CP had a low or moderate level of knowledge about appropriate caring for their children (5). Some caregivers do not receive any training in this area or the training they receive is not commensurate with their educational needs (6). To reduce or prevent their problems, these parents and caregivers are required to receive special training in caring for these children. There is evidence that shows the effectiveness of parental training in increasing parents' knowledge, reducing their stress and improving their quality of life (6-8). There are several methods for caregivers’ training including face to face training, training through workshops, offering booklets, training through videos and using telehealth. The effectiveness of caring training through workshops, offering booklets and face to face training in Iran is documented(7, 9, 10). In the field of telehealth, there is growing evidence of providing web-based interventions for people with diabetes and another diagnosis in Iran (11-14). Internet penetration rate in Iran is more than 50% and increased dramatically in recent years. Internet penetration rate is an indicator that represents the percentage of the population of a country or region that uses the Internet (15).
Telehealth is a broad term that includes both telemedicine and telerehabilitation and refers to the use of electronic information and telecommunication technologies to provide health-related services (16). Telehealth as a model of service delivery can be used in various fields including evaluation (tele-evaluation), intervention (tele-intervention), consultation (teleconsultation), monitoring a client (telemonitoring) and supervision (tele-supervision) (17, 18). Interest in the use of web-based intervention is increasing along with development in information and telecommunication technologies. It is now widely used in various fields including education and counseling for different age groups and a variety of diagnoses. Therefore, this model can be used to provide caring training for caregivers of children with CP. The use of telerehabilitation in comparison with other interventions provides benefits such as better clinical outcomes, more participation, and completion of interventions, more time for consultations and more client satisfaction (19). Accessibility to professionals and avoiding unnecessary delays in receiving care are other positive points about this model (19). Rehabilitation is a long-term and continuous process which sometimes leads to the disruption of a caregiver’s job, daily routines and the role of the family member. Satisfaction of clients with this model is high due to saving their time and low cost of services (19, 20).
Studies with the aim to development and evaluate a web-based intervention are summarized in Appendix 1. There are various methods for development of a web-based intervention and evaluation of the process of development. These include CeHRes roadmap, Intervention Mapping protocol, lifecycle method, etc. the CeHRes Roadmap is one of the methodsused as guidance for the developmental process of web-based interventions (21-23). This roadmap is generally appropriate for telehealth studies in which all the requirements and details needed for development are considered (24).
Appendix 1.
Summaries of studies with the aim to development and evaluate a web-based intervention
|
Search strategy:
Databases: Pubmed, OVID, ProQuest, Web of science, Elsevier, OT seeker, SID, Magiran, IRAN MEDEX, MEDLIB and Google scholar Keywords: (development, standardization),(validity, reliability, pilot testing, evaluation, formative evaluation, summative evaluation) and (web-based intervention, web-based program, teleintervention) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Goal | Framework | Methods |
| Skjoth 2015 |
Development of a web-based decision aid for participation in down syndrome screening | CeHRes roadmap |
|
| Ramadas 2015 |
Web-based dietary intervention for people with type 2 diabetes | Transtheoretical model's stages of change and user-centered design approach |
|
| Poelman 2013 |
Development and evaluation ofinternet-based interventions to raise awareness of food portion sizes | Transtheoretical model |
|
| Lee 2013 |
Development and evaluation web-based self management training and dietary intervention program for the cancer survivors | Life-cycle method |
|
| Kelders 2013 |
Development of web-based intervention to prevent depression | CeHRes Roadmap |
|
| Heckman 2015 |
Development of Internet intervention to demonstrate behaviors associated with risk of skin cancer in young adults. |
|
|
| Bravender 2013 |
Web-based intervention Development and use it to enhance the relationship between doctor and adolescents about healthy weights | Social Cognitive Theory Physician-barrier model |
|
| Danaher 2012 |
Development and process evaluation web-based training program of responsible beverage service |
|
|
| Fledderus 2015 |
Development and evaluation online Relapse-prevention program based acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain | CeHRes roadmap |
|
| Ghahari 2009 |
Development, standardize and pilot study of online fatigue self-management program | Problem solving |
|
| Dew 2004 |
Develop and evaluate web-based intervention to improve the psychological consequences in heart transplant recipients and family caregivers | Problem solving |
|
| Springvloet 2014 |
Development and evaluation protocol of two versions of Web-based nutrition training intervention for adults with cognitive and environment feedback | Intervention mapping protocol |
|
| Gelatt 2010 |
Development and evaluation of interactive web-based program for step families | ||
| Walters 2014 |
Development of web-based intervention for substance abuse treatment in criminal justice system | Extended parallel process model Motivational interviewing Social Cognitive Theory |
|
| Willems 2015 |
Systematic development of web-based intervention providing psychological and life style support for cancer survivors | intervention Mapping protocol Problem Solving cognitive behavioral therapy |
|
| Martorella 2013 |
Development and validity of virtual nursing intervention to improve self-management of pain after heart surgery | A nursery model |
|
This roadmap consists of five main steps as follows: The first step is to investigate the situation. The goal is to determine the problem with health care, what the contribution of technology would be to meet the problem and who will benefit from this technology. Research stakeholders with different backgrounds (financial stakeholders, patients, caregivers, etc.) are identified by the research team. The second step is to determine the value. This step refers to articulating the previous step. The third to fifth steps respectively are design, operationalization, and summative evaluation. Evaluation in this roadmap is done through two methods including 1) formative evaluation, done at each step with the aim of evaluating each step of the process; and 2) summative evaluation, which determines what can be achieved within the specified time. In this roadmap, formative evaluation is emphasized. At the end of each step experts’ and users’ comments are necessary for making necessary changes. Summative evaluations must consider both the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. Uptake of eHealth technologies refers to the data received from the website, for instance, number of logins. Impact of eHealth technologies denotes the data gathered by outcome measurement (24). Intervention mapping protocol was used in two studies as a general framework (25, 26).
This is a six-step protocol. 1) Determining the needs of the study population, 2) Determining performance objectives, and change objectives, 3) Determining the methods based on the theory and practical applications, 4) Developing and pretesting program components,5) Adoption and implementation and 6) Evaluation (26). This protocol covers development and intervention but formative evaluation is less pronounced in this protocol in comparison with the CeHRes roadmap. It can be used to design any intervention. Due to the importancegiven to the intervention in IM protocol special emphasis has not been put on the design and providing a model in IM protocol. The life cycle method consists of five stages: 1) Determine the needs of the user, 2) System design, 3) System development, 4) System evaluation and 5) System Application (27). In this method, unlike the IM protocol emphasis is on system design. The content development and attention to technology needs in accordance with user needs are not considered between the first and the second stage. The process of formative evaluation in this method has not received sufficient attention. Therefore, we used CeHRes Roadmap in accordance with our research conditions.
It is essential to provide training for caregivers. Continuous attendance in rehabilitation centers, traveling distances and spending a lot of money make it difficult for a caregiver to care for a child with cerebral palsy. It should consider providing training and childcare facilities in a child's living environment, so they do not have to spend a long time and cost. This issue is important in large cities, small towns and remote areas. In big cities, difficulty intraveling over long distances and in small towns, limited numbers of experts reduce training accessibilities. Therefore, online education is essential. The internet-based health service was theorized usage of family caregivers. They mapped three main factors influenced the use of the intervention: a) caregiver needs (personal capacity, available social support, and caregiving belief); b) information communication technology (ICT) factors (accessibility barriers and perceived efforts to use the technology); and c) style of using the technology (preference for using e-mail or the customized website). New caregivers employed interactive intervention such as using e-mail and more experienced caregivers used more reflective learning such as information on the website(28). Therefore, a web-based intervention for caregivers of children with CP is more appropriate for more experienced caregivers.
In general, the quality evaluation of the developmental process of a web-based intervention can be done through various procedures including system quality, content quality, and service quality. System quality means the technology is user-friendly, secure and easy to access. Content quality means the content is understandable, meaningful and convincing. Service quality refers to whether the service is provided sufficiently (24, 29).
This study was conducted with two aims. The first was to develop a user-friendly web-based intervention for training caregivers of children with CP. The second was to evaluate the process of development. To achieve these aims the method of development and evaluation was specified by the researcher and also the factors affecting the researcher’s decision about the method was determined.
Materials and Methods
Our study applied steps of the CeHRes Roadmap with some modification in accordance with the research conditions. The method was implemented in four main steps. In the first step (determine the needs of users), caregivers of children with CP were asked about information concerning their training needs. In the second step (content development), content for caregivers web-based training was developed by the experts. In the third step (design), website prototype was designed and in the fourth step (operational and evaluation), a pilot study was conducted.
Approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee of the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences IR.USWR.REC.1395.92. Informed written consent was received from participated caregivers.
Determining the needs of users
This step was performed by one of the authors (M, R) through a separate qualitative content analysis study (30). Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted with mothers of children with CP who participated in face to face training program. The aim was to seek information on barriers and facilitators of the use of the training by mothers. Inclusion criteria include mothers of children with CP with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) (31) level ΙΙΙ, ΙѴ, and Ѵ, aged from 4 to 12 yr. They were recruited from Occupational Therapy Clinics in Tehran, Iran. Mothers attended a workshop and received a booklet and then used training for three months. This period was accompanied by an occupational therapist telephone follow-up. After three months, 15 mothers were interviewed individually. The interviews were recorded and then transcribed. To get more information about this step please see the article (30).
Content development
During this step, first a questionnaire -was developed by the research team- was sent by E-mail to a number of experts with the experience of training parents and caregivers of children with CP. Four women and one man, with one of them holding a Ph.D., three being Ph.D. students and one holding a Master with the mean age of 29.6 (SD= 5.46) yr and the mean clinical experience 6.4 (SD= 4.34) yr completed the questionnaire. These researchers had used the content of face to face caring training of children with CP for caregivers in their studies. This questionnaire asked the researcher whether the training topics were helpful or not and are the training topics necessary to be maintained? In this part of the study, two of the researchers received the questionnaire by email and sent it back after completion. The other three completed the questionnaire in a face-to-face meeting. The comments received were discussed in the research team and decisions were made about changes.
In order to seek information on whether the website homepage has particular importance to attract the attention of caregivers to the necessity of the topic, a questionnaire was completed by the experts who took part in the previous step. After explaining the purpose of this questionnaire, the researchers were requested to offer their comments in two parts, first about some statements presented with images in the website homepage and second about some texts for more information. The received comments were discussed by the research team and decisions were made about necessary changes by expert consensus.
Design
A paper prototype was first designed. Then, in a meeting with a website designer the paper prototype was discussed and requirements for the development of the website were determined. Then, a power point prototype was designed and evaluated by the research team. After that, the website was developed by the designer. The website was developed in HTML, jQuery, and bootstrap (9) and the database management system SQL server (2014). The program was written using Asp.net MVC (4).
Operational and Evaluation
In this step, the web-based training was applied to 10 caregivers of children with CP for four weeks. We decided on 10 to cover caregivers with variety of education and experience of using the internet. Inclusion criteria were included mothers of children with CP with (GMFCS) (31) level ΙΙΙ, ΙѴ, and Ѵ, aged from 4 to 12 yr. They were recruited from occupational therapy clinics in Tehran with convenient sampling. At first, these caregivers were invited to an individual meeting with the researcher to become familiar with use of the website on either mobile phones or personal computers. After registration and user verification by the administrator, they set their educational priorities and downloaded the first priority in their first meeting. During the meeting, discussions, questions, and problems encountered by the caregivers were recorded by the researcher. Then, caregivers downloaded their next four weeks priorities. After four weeks, the usability of the website was tested on these 10 caregivers using WAMMI (32) questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of twenty statements with a five-point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree). The scores of statements in negative terms were reversed. Higher scores reflect greater usability of the website.
Results
Determining the needs of users
Facilitating factors in training caregivers were divided into three groups: Factors related to workshops, booklet and persistent relationship between parents and therapists. Caregivers approved the appropriateness of content with their needs.
Caregivers were more motivated to do home care training program if attention was paid to parents’ educational needs, their physical and mental health and if parental awareness was increased and also if the parents were counterparts in the network of caregivers with similar experience. Due to the importance of educational needs of caregivers, the possibility of determining educational priorities was considered on the website. Moreover, the possibility to communicate and express similar experiences was provided on the website.
Content development
The summaries of suggestions were discussed by the research team and decisions were made about changes. The topics provided in face to face training were maintained for web-based training. Self-care education (for caregivers) and play were added to the topics. Therefore, web-based training was prepared in nine general topics (Figure 1).According to the experts’ suggestions for greater impact, the training was presented weekly. Training was provided in accordance with the priorities of caregivers. For determining the content of the website homepage, proposed sentences and texts were discussed by the research group and three sentences were selected for presentations to accompany the picture on the homepage including "Do you want to reduce the time it takes to take care of your child?; Do you know after receiving the training program caregiver musculoskeletal pain is reduced?; And do you want your child to be more independent in her/his own care?" Moreover, some texts about CP, motor growth prediction and concepts related to daily care were added to the homepage and user page to enhance the user’s personal information. To develop the required texts, the basic content of the texts were prepared by one of the researchers. Then, two experts with Ph.D. and over 20 yr of experience working with children read the prepared texts and presented their suggestions and made corrections.
Figure 1.
Web-based caring training topics
Design
In the first part, the paper prototype was designed and analyzed with a web designer. Some facilities were considered for the user. These facilities included having a personal page, possibility to determine training priorities based on needs, communication among members and the possibility of questions and answers with an expert. Some facilities were considered for the administrator. These facilities included user verification, answers to questions; report lists of the users, number of entries and downloads, transferring Frequently Asked Questions to the homepage and the potential of providing new information.
In the second part, with the purpose of visualizing ideas, a PowerPoint prototype was designed. In this stage, all content put on the website prepared in the previous steps and information necessary to subscribe (approved by the group of experts) was inserted into a PowerPoint prototype with some pictures for visual attraction. After verification by the research team, the prototype was presented to the web designer to start website development.
Website development was conducted with multiple checks by the research group. In the first modification, website animated images became smaller with more emphasis on their texts by resizing and changing their font color. In the second modification, for explaining the purpose some texts were added to the homepage regarding what is designed, who are the targets groups of the website, what services will be offered on the website and how to use these services. For this purpose, a text was prepared and approved by two experts. In the third modification, children's drawings were used instead of images for the purpose of offering native pictures. Besides, short message service was added to the website to for user verification and to remind the user to download the next priority. The possibility to communicate with similar caregivers and professionals was provided. The accuracy of these conversations was controlled by administration (an Occupational Therapy Ph.D. student) and an expert with Ph.D. The guide for the website was developed. After multiple tests by the designer and the research team, the website was ready for use in the next step (http://www.cpcare.ir). All stages of development all web design standards were noted (33).
Operational and Evaluation
Participants' demographic information is shown in Table 1. In this step, questions asked by the caregivers or difficulties faced by them during the first meeting were summarized and discussed by the research team. For example, pages whose font size was said to be small or whose image size was thought to be large were resized by the designer. Or where the caregivers had to spend time to find the buttons, their access was increased. At this stage, the explanations on the register page were shortened to reduce the time required to complete the registration process. Moreover, to increase the speed and ease of use some explanations were added to the website guide. After completion, the usability questionnaire the average score of 70.5 was observed among caregivers. The average score of all statements was above three.
Table 1.
Demographic information of participants in the usability test
| Distribution of participants | ||
|---|---|---|
| Caregiver age (year) | ||
| Mean (sd) | 32.6 (5.72) | |
| Caregiver education | ||
| < diploma | 3 | |
| diploma | 2 | |
| bachelor | 4 | |
| master | 1 | |
| Caregiver experience of use of internet | ||
| low | 3 | |
| moderate | 5 | |
| alot | 2 | |
| Child age (month) | ||
| Mean (sd) | 80.03 (29.26) | |
| Child sex | ||
| female | 4 | |
| male | 6 | |
| MACS level | ||
| Level ΙΙ | 1 | |
| Level ΙΙΙ | 3 | |
| Level ΙѴ | 3 | |
| Level Ѵ | 3 | |
| GMFCS level | ||
| Level ΙΙΙ | 3 | |
| Level ΙѴ | 3 | |
| Level Ѵ | 4 |
Discussion
This study aimed to develop web-based intervention for daily care training for caregivers of children with CP and evaluate the process of its development. At first, for decision making on how to develop and evaluate web-based intervention, the researcher reviewed some studies mentioned in Appendix 1. After summarizing the various methods used in the studies for web-based development and evaluation, a method was specified. This method was modified according to different factors including access, finance and time. The process of the development and evaluation was a dynamic process and needed researcher’s decision making during the process. In this section, the process is discussed with regard to other studies reviewed in Appendix 1 to determine the factors affecting researcher’s decision-making.
In accordance with research factors that influence researcher’s decision, CeHRes Roadmap was used with some changes. For example, the first two steps of this method in our study were conducted as a separate study to determine the user's needs. In the second step, the content was developed. Next steps were based on the roadmap.
In our study, the first step was to determine the user's needdone in a separate qualitative study. Mothers mentioned that they will be motivated if more attention is paid to their educational needs then in our study the possibility of determining educational priorities was considered on the website. In addition, they wanted to have networked caregivers with similar experiences the possibility to communicate and express similar experiences was provided on the website. They approved the appropriateness of content with their needs. The effectiveness of the face to face content was also approved in studies (7-9, 34). The step "determine the needs of the user" has been conducted as a first step in developing a web-based intervention study(22, 23, 25-27, 35). This step was done followed reviewing relevant literature and interviews with the users. Content and related technology requirements in accordance with user needs were developed in the next step. However, some studies have reported this as a first step (27, 36-40). Considering that the content in of face to face daily care training of children with CP for caregivers was available, and its effectiveness has been examined in various studies, in our study the first step was to determine the user's needs. After that, face to face training content was developed for web-based intervention. Performing a step like determining user requirements or contextual inquiry increases contact between the researcher and users which is a necessary component. The results of this step led to the better use of technology to meet the user's needs. In our study caregivers had the possibility to communicate with caregivers with similar experiences to facilitate greater use of training. If a researcher does not have access to face to face or web-based training, content development must be done before the design. In our study, there was access to face to face training. So it was improved for use in web-based training. All face to face training topics were maintained and some topics were added to them. According to the caregivers' and experts' views, training was provided weekly. It was essential to take these two steps prior to the design phase to consider the website requirements.
In our study modeling and analysis were performed by multiple models with paper, PowerPoint, and prototype. Use of paper and PowerPoint and prototype modeling can be quite helpful because Web-based intervention development in the early stages is abstract. Design was done in the next stages of the studies. Designing a model has been done with paper, PowerPoint or prototype model and then feedbacks from users were received for editing (21, 41, 42). These feedbacks were considered as formative evaluation. Model designing improves evaluation procedures and can help to reduce the time needed for design.
In our study, considering research conditions, evaluation was conducted in two stages including implementation and getting feedback from users and usability evaluation. For evaluating the process of web-based intervention studies have used various methods including assessing acceptability and website usability through a pilot study and getting feedback from users (41), assessing the usability and accuracy of the content in the group of experts, and user-friendliness with completing questionnaires by the user (27), content understandability assessment by experts, acceptability assessment with the structured interviews, usability evaluation by questionnaires and interviews (37), usability evaluation via think aloud modeling technique (43), usability and clarity evaluation with semi-structured interviews and usability evaluation through think aloud modeling technique (23) and accessibility and user satisfaction evaluation using information from website (36). Thus evaluations were done in terms of accuracy, intelligibility, and clarity of content as well as design usability and user satisfaction. The evaluations have been conducted in various ways including interviews, cognitive techniques; think aloud modeling technique, completing questionnaires and meetings with users and experts. Data were also obtained from the website. In our study, after first session implementation feedbacks from users received and after four weeks usability evaluation was done. It shows that our website has acceptable usability and it is easy to use by mothers with different level of education and internet experience.
The process of the web-based intervention development is a dynamic process. In our research, we had to add some possibilities to match the needs faced during development. For instance, users of our website had the possibility to ask their questions of an expert. Hence, when the expert answered their questions, they were not aware of the response. The research team decided to incorporate short message service (SMS) module into the program. The users received an SMS informing that the expert answered their questions. Moreover, this service was used to remember the user to download the next priority and user verification by the system.
The website has the possibilities including registering caregivers of children with CP with the registry form including GMFCS, Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) (44) (was recorded according to the parent questionnaire in website) and IQ level (SPARCLE study)(45), the possibility to confirm registration with an SMS, the possibility to determine the caregiver educational priorities and to remind the caregiver to download priority weekly. The users can share her/his experiences with other users and can ask questions of an expert. The effectiveness of the web-based caring training for caregivers of children with CP must be determined in a randomized controlled trial. We would also suggest assessing parental satisfaction as well as the impact it has on the children.
In the present study, it was not possible to take into account the level of caregiver experiences. Therefore, it is suggested that to pay attention to the amount of caregiver experience in future studies. Effective factors were identified in the use of Internet-based services. These factors included caregivers' needs, factors relating to communication technology, and information use style. Theexperience of caregiver affects the style of using that information (28).
In Iran, the majority of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy are mothers; we provided our training to mothers as the main caregiver. Future studies are presented to the father and other family members.
Limitations
This type of research requires multiple investigations performed by the user at different stages. In this study due to time limited access to users at some steps was limited. It seems better to follow each step in a separate study to spend enough time on every step.
Most of caregivers of children with CP in the study context were mothers. Then caregivers in this study were mothers. This might limit the generalizability of study results to fathers who are also caregivers.
One of the limitations we encountered during the study was the speed of the internet and its interruptions, which user had to reconnect.
In conclusion, for web-based intervention development, it seems more effective to first determine study needs and then proceed with content development. If face to face intervention is available, it can speed up the design process. The main components of face to face intervention could reconstruct for web-based intervention. If there is no access to face to face intervention, content development can be conducted based on the literature reviews and experts’ and users’ views depending on the objectives of interventions and theories and methods. Then content adaption must be done by specifying technical requirements and methods for web-based content. In the third step, designing paper or PowerPoint models and receiving users’ and experts' comments and designing a prototype model and initial testing can improve the process. Finally, preliminary testing seems to be helpful for summative evaluation (Figure 2). To develop and evaluate a web-based intervention access is essential including access to various experts including website design experts and experts familiar with content, hardware and software accessibility, access to the same people supposed to use certain websites, access to finance. In addition, lack of time that affects the researcher’s decision during the research process.
Figure 2.
Researcher flowchart for designing web-based interventions
Our website has the possibilities including registering caregivers of children with CP, the possibility to confirm registration with an SMS and the possibility to determine the caregiver educational priorities and also has the usability for training caregivers of children with CP.
Acknowledgment
The project was sponsored by the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences and the Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center.
Author`s Contribution
Nobakhat developed the proposal, data collection and prepare first draft of the article.
Rassafiani developed the idea, designed the study, involved in preparing the article and give the final approval.
Hosseini supervised the research proposal and helped in the first draft.
All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109(Suppl 109):8–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rassafiani M, Sahaf R. Hypertonicity in children with cerebral palsy: A new perspective. Iran Rehabil J. 2011;9:66–74. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Davis E, Shelly A, Waters E, Boyd R, Cook K, Davern M. The impact of caring for a child with cerebral palsy: quality of life for mothers and fathers. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36(1):63–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00989.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jalili N, Godarzi M, Rassafiani M, Haghgoo H, Dalvand H, Farzi M. The influenced factors on quality of life of mothers of children with severe cerebral palsy: A survey study. J Modern Rehabil. 2013;7(3):40–7. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Razavi Afzal Z-A, Rassafiani M, Sarfaraz Z, Malekpour M, Salehi M. A Survey on caregivers' knowledge about special caring for 1-to-5 year-old children with cerebral palsy and their compliance with these practices. J Res Rehabil Sci. 2013;9(4):618–28. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Allah ESA, El Awady S, Hameed HSAE. Improving the Care Provided to Hemiplegics Cerebral Palsy Children by Their Family Caregivers: An Intervention Study. J Am Sci. 2012;8(2) [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jalili N, Goodarzy M, Rassafiani M, Farzi M. Effectiveness of a parent training program on knowledge of mothers regarding the proper care of children with cerebral palsy. J Res Rehabil Sci. 2012;8(3):502–10. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jalili N, Rassafiani M, Dalvand H, Haghgoo HA, Farzi M. The effectiveness of handling training on stress and quality of life among mothers of children with cerebral palsy aged 4-12 years old. J Res Rehabil Sci. 2013;9(1):48–58. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ghorbanpoor Z, Hosseini A, Vameghi R, Rassafiani M, Dalvand H, Rezasoltani P. The effect of “handling training” for caregivers at home and home adaptation on gross motor function of 15-72 months old cerebral palsy children. J Modern Rehabil. 2014;8(1):35–42. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Khanjani M, Hatamizadeh N, Hosseini M, Rahgozar M, Arjmand M. Effect of education about caring of children with Cerebral palsy on quality of life of family-caregivers. JREHAB. 2009;10(3):38–42. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Azizi A, Aboutorabi R, Mazloum-Khorasani Z, Afzal-Aghaea M, Tara M. Development, validation, and evaluation of Web-based Iranian Diabetic Personal Health Record: rationale for and protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(1):e39. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jahangiry L, Montazeri A, Najafi M, Yaseri M, Farhangi M. An interactive web-based intervention on nutritional status, physical activity and health-related quality of life in patient with metabolic syndrome: a randomized-controlled trial (The Red Ruby Study) Nutr Diabetes. 2017;7(1):e240. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2016.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ayatollahi H, Hasannezhad M, Fard HS, Haghighi MK. Type 1 diabetes self-management: developing a web-based telemedicine application. Health Inf Manag. 2016;45(1):16–26. doi: 10.1177/1833358316639456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moattari M, Hashemi M, Dabbaghmanesh MH. The impact of electronic education on metabolic control indicators in patients with diabetes who need insulin: a randomised clinical control trial. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(1-2):32–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Internet penetration management system [Internet] National Internet Development Management Center and Iran Information Technology Organization; [[cited 2015/04/13]]. Available from: http://www.iriu.ir/matma. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cason J. Telehealth opportunities in occupational therapy through the Affordable Care Act. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66(2):131–6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.662001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jacobs K, Cason J, McCullough A. The Process for the Formulation of the International Telehealth Position Statement for Occupational Therapy. Int J Telerehabil. 2015;7(1):21–32. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2015.6163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wakeford L, Wittman PP, White M, Schmeler M. telerehabilitation position paper. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59(6):656–60. doi: 10.5014/ajot.59.6.656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, Visintin M. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(6):427–47. doi: 10.1080/09638280802062553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cason J. Telehealth: A rapidly developing service delivery model for occupational therapy. Int J Telerehabil. 2014;6(1):29. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2014.6148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Skjøth MM, Hansen HP, Draborg E, Pedersen CD, Lamont RF, Jørgensen JS. Informed Choice for Participation in Down Syndrome Screening: Development and Content of a Web-Based Decision Aid. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(3) doi: 10.2196/resprot.4291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kelders SM, Pots WT, Oskam MJ, Bohlmeijer ET, van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Development of a web-based intervention for the indicated prevention of depression. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fledderus M, Schreurs KM, Bohlmeijer ET, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM. Development and pilot evaluation of an online relapse-prevention program based on acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain patients. JMIR Hum Factors. 2015;2(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.3302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Nijland N, van Limburg M, Ossebaard HC, Kelders SM, Eysenbach G, et al. A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4) doi: 10.2196/jmir.1672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Springvloet L, Lechner L, Oenema A. Planned development and evaluation protocol of two versions of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention aimed at adults, including cognitive and environmental feedback. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1) doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Willems RA, Bolman CA, Mesters I, Kanera IM, Beaulen AA, Lechner L. The Kanker Nazorg Wijzer (Cancer Aftercare Guide) protocol: the systematic development of a web-based computer tailored intervention providing psychosocial and lifestyle support for cancer survivors. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1588-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee MK, Park H-A, Yun YH, Chang YJ. Development and formative evaluation of a web-based self-management exercise and diet intervention program with tailored motivation and action planning for cancer survivors. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chiu TM, Eysenbach G. Theorizing the health service usage behavior of family caregivers: a qualitative study of an internet-based intervention. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(11):754–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, Stergioulas LK. An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit) Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(6):386–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ghashghaee M, Mohammadi F, Rassafiani M, Hosseini S, Sahaf R. Determining the facilitating factors in parental adherence to a homebased educational special caring program for children with cerebral palsy: A content analysis of parents’ educational experiences. J Res Rehabil Sci. 2014;10:1. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dehghan L, Abdolvahab M, Bagheri H, Dalvand H. Inter rater reliability of Persian version of Gross Motor Function Classification System Expanded and Revised in patients with cerebral palsy. Daneshvar Medicine. 2011;18(91):37–44. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Claridge N, Kirakowski J. WAMMI; [[updated 2016; cited 2017 25 march ]]. Available from: http://www.wammi.com/using.html#educational. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zahedi S. Assessing quality of website: instrumentation and criteria. Journal of Development Evolution Management . 2010;1389:5–16. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ghorbanpor Z, Hosseini SA, Vamghi R, Rassafiani M, Dalvand H, Reza Soltani P. The effect of “handling training” to caregivers at home on fine motor development in 6 to 72 months old children with cerebral palsy (cp) J Res Rehabil Sci. 2012;1(1):466–76. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Martorella G, Cote J, Choiniere M. SOULAGE-TAVIE: Development and validation of a virtual nursing intervention to promote self-management of postoperative pain after cardiac surgery. Comput Inform Nurs. 2013;31(4):189–97. doi: 10.1097/NXN.0b013e3182812d69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dew MA, Goycoolea JM, Harris RC, Lee A, Zomak R, Dunbar-Jacob J, et al. An internet-based intervention to improve psychosocial outcomes in heart transplant recipients and family caregivers: development and evaluation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23(6):745–58. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Heckman C, Darlow S, Munshi T, Caruso C, Ritterband L, Raivitch S, et al. Development of an internet intervention to address behaviors associated with skin cancer risk among young adults. Internet Interv. 2015;2(3):340–50. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Walters ST, Ondersma SJ, Ingersoll KS, Rodriguez M, Lerch J, Rossheim ME, et al. MAPIT: Development of a web-based intervention targeting substance abuse treatment in the criminal justice system. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;46(1):60–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bravender T, Tulsky JA, Farrell D, Alexander SC, Østbye T, Lyna P, et al. Teen CHAT: development and utilization of a web-based intervention to improve physician communication with adolescents about healthy weight. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(3):525–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Poelman MP, Steenhuis IH, de Vet E, Seidell JC. The development and evaluation of an internet-based intervention to increase awareness about food portion sizes: a randomized, controlled trial. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013;45(6):701–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ramadas A, Chan CKY, Oldenburg B, Hussien Z, Quek KF. A web-based dietary intervention for people with type 2 diabetes: development, implementation, and evaluation. Int J Behav Med. 2015;22(3):365–73. doi: 10.1007/s12529-014-9445-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ghahari S, Packer TL, Passmore AE. Development, standardisation and pilot testing of an online fatigue self-management program. Disabil Rehabil. 2009 doi: 10.1080/09638280902751956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Danaher BG, Dresser J, Shaw T, Severson HH, Tyler MS, Maxwell ED, et al. Development and process evaluation of a web-based responsible beverage service training program. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012;7(1) doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Riahi A, Rassafiani M, Binesh M. The Cross-Cultural Validation and Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability of the Persian Translation of Parent Version of the Gross Motor Function Classification System for Children with Cerebral Palsy. JREHAB. 2013;13(5):25–30. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gunel MK, Mutlu A, Tarsuslu T, Livanelioglu A. Relationship among the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and the functional status (WeeFIM) in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168(4):477–85. doi: 10.1007/s00431-008-0775-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]