Sir,
We read with great interest, the article by Kumar et al.[1] titled “Speech and Swallowing Function Outcome Following Early Tracheostomy in Patients Who Underwent Neurosurgical Intervention.” We appreciate this article along with the limitations highlighted by the authors. Swallowing dysfunction is not very uncommon after endotracheal intubation and is observed in nearly 20% patients who suffered from acute respiratory failure.[2] Diagnosis of swallowing dysfunction is incompletely defined. Water swallowing test is a standard bedside evaluation. Fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing is more definitive to identify, to assess severity and prognosis.[3]
We would like to pose a few comments regarding this study to the authors:
In the introduction section, the authors have mentioned that “mechanical ventilator leads to decrease in intracranial pressure.” However, changes in intracranial pressure will depend on the ventilatory mode, pCO2 level, and hemodynamic status of the patients.[4] Tracheostomy decreases incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia – this is also much debated[5]
Speech-related complications may be related to other factors rather than tracheostomy itself. Duration of orotracheal intubation before tracheostomy, synchronization with ventilator, and preexisting speech status if mentioned could probably help to exclude those factors.[6] Moreover, neurological insult itself may have an impact on such complications
Speech and swallowing function may also be affected by duration and level of tracheostomy, tracheostomy tube quality, cuff pressure, and patients' speech training.[7] Authors could provide an insight on these issues
We would like to know about the patients who were discharged on tracheostomy. How did the authors plan to assess them in the follow-up? Also early after decannulation, speech production may be difficult due to persistence of stomal opening and incomplete closure during talking
Using standard bedside tests for evaluation of swallowing dysfunction may miss many patients of actual dysfunction due to uncertain accuracy.[2]
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kumar VA, Reddy BU, Kiran Kumar VA, Pal R, Kumar RL, Jahnavi M, et al. Speech and swallowing function outcome following early tracheostomy in patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018;22:427–30. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_31_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Skoretz SA, Flowers HL, Martino R. The incidence of dysphagia following endotracheal intubation: A systematic review. Chest. 2010;137:665–73. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Macht M, White SD, Moss M. Swallowing dysfunction after critical illness. Chest. 2014;146:1681–9. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition. Neurosurgery. 2017;80:6–15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Catalino MP, Lin FC, Davis N, Anderson K, Olm-Shipman C, Jordan JD, et al. Early versus late tracheostomy after decompressive craniectomy for stroke. J Intensive Care. 2018;6:1. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0269-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Santos PM, Afrassiabi A, Weymuller EA., Jr Risk factors associated with prolonged intubation and laryngeal injury. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;111:453–9. doi: 10.1177/019459989411100411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Freeman-Sanderson AL, Togher L, Elkins MR, Phipps PR. Return of voice for ventilated tracheostomy patients in ICU: A Randomized controlled trial of early-targeted intervention. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1075–81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]