Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Sep 28;13(9):e0204308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204308

Branched chain amino acid transaminase 1 (BCAT1) is overexpressed and hypomethylated in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease who experience adverse clinical events: A pilot study

Kara Wegermann 1, Ricardo Henao 2, Anna Mae Diehl 1, Susan K Murphy 3, Manal F Abdelmalek 1, Cynthia A Moylan 1,4,*
Editor: Pavel Strnad5
PMCID: PMC6161885  PMID: 30265706

Abstract

Background and objectives

Although the burden of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) continues to increase worldwide, genetic factors predicting progression to cirrhosis and decompensation in NAFLD remain poorly understood. We sought to determine whether gene expression profiling was associated with clinical decompensation and death in patients with NAFLD, and to assess whether altered DNA methylation contributes to these changes in gene expression.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 86 patients in the Duke NAFLD Clinical Database and Biorepository with biopsy-proven NAFLD whose liver tissue was previously evaluated for gene expression and DNA methylation using array based technologies. We assessed the prospective development of liver and cardiovascular disease related outcomes, including hepatic decompensation as identified by the development of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, or variceal bleeding as well as stroke and myocardial infarction via medical chart review.

Results

Of the 86 patients, 47 had F0-F1 fibrosis and 39 had F3-F4 fibrosis at index liver biopsy. Gene expression probe sets (n = 54,675) were analyzed; 42 genes showed significant differential expression (p<0.05) and a two-fold change in expression between patients with and without any outcome. Two expression probes of the branched chain amino-acid transaminase 1 (BCAT1) gene were upregulated (p = 0.02; fold change 2.1 and 2.2 respectively) in patients with a clinical outcome. Methylation of three of the 34 BCAT1 CpG methylation probes were significantly inversely correlated with BCAT1 expression specific to the probes predictive of clinical deterioration.

Conclusion

We found differential gene expression, correlated to changes in DNA methylation, at multiple BCAT1 loci in patients with cardiovascular outcomes and/or hepatic decompensation. BCAT1 catalyzes the transformation of alpha-ketoglutarate to glutamate and has been linked to the presence and severity of NAFLD, possibly through derangements in the balance between glutamate and alpha-ketoglutarate. Given the potential for BCAT1 to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes, and the potential therapeutic implications, these results should be validated in larger prospective studies.

Introduction

The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) continues to increase worldwide resulting in significant morbidity and mortality [1]. NAFLD is currently the second most common reason for liver transplantation, but is projected to become the most common in the coming years [2]. However, the clinical course of individuals with NAFLD can vary dramatically; patients with simple steatosis may never experience liver dysfunction, while a subset develops inflammation and fibrosis, thereby increasing their risk for cirrhosis and complications of end-stage liver disease.

Currently, providers use a combination of clinical and laboratory data, imaging, fibrosis scoring systems and even histology to determine which NAFLD patients have advanced fibrosis and thus increased risk for poor outcomes. For example, obesity, advanced age, diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking and menopausal status have all been associated with advanced NAFLD fibrosis [3, 4]. Several scoring systems such as the NAFLD Fibrosis Score, FIB-4 and BARD score help clinicians estimate fibrosis stage [58]. Other algorithms such as Fibrosure and Fibrospect II and imaging modalities such as transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can assist with investigating fibrosis, but these are expensive and not universally available [9]. Liver biopsy is considered the gold standard for fibrosis assessment, but is also expensive and invasive and carries the risk of complications. A major barrier exists in that while these data inform providers about fibrosis and cirrhosis, none of these predict fibrosis progression, the ultimate determinant of outcomes. Additionally, once cirrhosis is established, determining which patients will develop decompensation or other complications remains difficult. Identifying novel predictors for decompensation or important clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular disease could help clinicians target intensive management strategies for higher risk patients and potentially even inform future novel treatment targets.

Gene expression changes in liver and other tissues can differentiate NAFLD patients from those without NAFLD. These changes have largely been identified via candidate gene studies[10]. Previously, we conducted a cross sectional analysis revealing a 64-gene expression profile that accurately differentiated mild from severe NAFLD fibrosis histology independent of clinical factors [11]. Subsequently, we identified a group of genes and pathways whose expression in severe NAFLD was significantly inversely associated with DNA methylation [12]. Given the association of these genes with fibrosis and cirrhosis, we hypothesized that there would be be a group of genes also predictive of poor outcomes of NAFLD. The objectives of the present study were first to determine whether gene expression profiling at the time of liver biopsy is associated with the development of clinical decompensation and death, and second, to determine if DNA methylation changes were correlated with identified changes in gene expression. The eventual goal is to identify molecular pathways linked to NAFLD-related morbidity and mortality that could inform non-invasive markers able to predict poor outcomes in NAFLD, even prior to the development of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis.

Methods

Patients and clinical data

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD whose liver tissue was previously evaluated for gene expression and DNA methylation using array based technologies [11, 12]. Patients are part of the Duke University Health System (DUHS) NAFLD Biorepository, which contains frozen liver biopsy specimens, blood, and clinical data from patients undergoing diagnostic liver biopsy to grade and stage severity of NAFLD as part of standard of care. For study purposes, NAFLD was defined as: (1) presence of ≥ 5% hepatic steatosis on liver biopsy; (2) absence of histologic and serologic evidence for other chronic liver disease in a patient with risk factors for the metabolic syndrome. Patients were excluded from the biorepository if they were pregnant, unable to consent for liver biopsy, had a contraindication to liver biopsy, or had evidence of other etiologies of chronic liver disease (heavy alcohol use (>20 grams/day), detectable hepatitis C virus RNA level, or positive hepatitis B surface antigen). The biorepository is approved by the Duke Institutional Review Board, with patients consented for genomic analyses of specimens. Details of the histologic analysis and demographic information have been previously published [11]. Additional approval for clinical outcomes investigation was obtained for this study (Duke eIRB Pro00065463).

Baseline demographic information including height, weight, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), age, gender, race, smoking status, comorbidities, and laboratory studies including fasting lipids, glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), liver aminotransferases, and measures of liver synthetic function were collected on all patients within 3–6 months of liver biopsy. Methods for baseline data collection have been described previously [11]. Briefly, this was performed via patient questionnaires and manual data abstraction from the electronic medical record.

Study period and outcomes

The follow up period for each patient was defined as the time of index liver biopsy until the occurrence of first clinical event, death, liver transplantation (LT), loss to follow up, or July 1, 2015, whichever came first. Outcomes were abstracted via manual review of the electronic medical record. Clinical deterioration/outcomes were defined as evidence of hepatic decompensation including the development of ascites (confirmed on imaging) hepatic encephalopathy (requiring treatment with lactulose and/or rifaximin), diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, or variceal bleeding. Stroke and myocardial infarction were assessed using discharge summaries and problem lists. Patients were excluded if they had evidence of clinical decompensation at the time of liver biopsy or had previously undergone LT.

Gene expression analysis

Details of the hepatic gene expression analysis have been described previously [11]. Briefly, liver biopsy samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. RNA was isolated from using the AllPrep Micro Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions after samples were thawed in RNAlater-ICE at -20°C (Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin, TX). Microarray hybridization was performed on Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), using MessageAmp Premier (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) for RNA amplification and hybridization. A total of 54,675 probes were considered for analyses after standard RMA normalization.

DNA methylation analysis

Details regarding the DNA methylation analysis, quality control, and normalization procedures on frozen liver biopsy samples from the same patients have been described [12]. Briefly, DNA was bisulfite modified using the Zymo EZ DNA Methylation Kit. The bisulfite modified genomic DNAs were submitted to Expression Analysis (Research Triangle Park, NC) and assayed on the Illumina HumanMethylation450 beadchip data. From a total of 485,512 CpG sites, 34 CpG sites associated with BCAT1 were considered for analyses after quantile normalization using the minfi R package [13].

Statistical analysis

Generalized linear models were used to quantify the association between gene expression and the composite outcome, clinical variables and fibrosis stage. The link function of the generalized linear model was set according to the nature of the independent variable (continuous, binary or ordinal). The primary model was controlled for age, BMI, DM, fibrosis stage, and batch, with the composite outcome of death, liver-related morbidity or cardiovascular disease as the dependent variable of interest and gene expression the independent variable. P-values < 0.05 with a two-fold or greater change in gene expression were considered statistically significant, unless otherwise specified. Correlations between gene expression probes and methylation CpG sites were estimated via Spearman’s rank-order correlation. All statistical analyses were performed in Matlab (MathWorks, Inc).

Results

Patient characteristics

Eighty-six patients with high quality hepatic gene expression data were included in the study. Patients were divided by fibrosis stage as part of the original gene expression analysis; 47 patients had fibrosis stage F0 or F1 and 39 had fibrosis stage F3 or F4 (Table 1). Most patients were female (67%, n = 58), white (89%, n = 77), and obese with a median BMI of 36 kg/m2. BMI did not differ by fibrosis stage. Median age at study entry was 53 years (range, 27 to 81 years). Patients with more advanced stages of fibrosis were significantly older than those with milder stages of fibrosis (p = 0.04). Thirty-six (41.9%) patients had a diagnosis of DM and this was significantly more common in those with advanced stages of fibrosis (p = 0.001).

Table 1. Patient characteristics at baseline.

P-values reflect fibrosis stage comparisons.

Overall
(n = 86)
Mild NAFLD
(n = 47)
Advanced NAFLD
(n = 39)
p-value
Fibrosis Stage F0
(n = 17)
F1
(n = 30)
F3
(n = 30)
F4
(n = 9)
Gender (% female) 58 (67.4) 11 (64.7) 18 (60.0) 2 (73.3) 7 (77.8) 0.63
Age, mean±SD 50.9 ± 10.6 51.1 ± 9.1 50.6 ± 10.7 48.3 ± 10.8 59.7 ± 8.7 0.50
Race 0.64
    White (%) 77 (89.5) 15 (88.2) 27 (90.0) 27 (90.0) 8 (88.9)
    Black (%) 6 (7.0) 2 (11.8) 1 (3.3) 2 (6.7) 1 (11.1)
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) mean ± SD 36.3 ± 8.9 35.4 ± 8.3 35.8 ± 8.9 36.9 ± 7.9 37.5 ± 13.2 0.43
Diabetes Mellitus (%) 36 (41.9) 4 (23.5) 7 (23.3) 18 (60.0) 7 (77.8) 0.001
Hyperlipidemia (%) 55 (63.9) 14 (82.4) 19 (63.3) 18 (60.0) 4 (44.4) 0.24
Hypertension (%) 54 (62.8) 11 (64.7) 16 (53.3) 19 (63.3) 8 (88.9) 0.28
Smoking (%) 6 (7.7) 2 (11.8) 1 (3.8) 3 (11.5) 0 0.52
NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) > = 5 34 (39.5) 2 (11.8) 11 (36.7) 19 (63.3) 2 (22.2) 0.003
Hemoglobin A1c (%), mean ± SD 6.32 ± 1.0 5.9 ± 0.5 6.1 ± 1.2 6.6 ± 1.2 6.5 ± 0.8 0.033

SD, standard deviation

Outcomes

Follow up from time of liver biopsy to outcome or study end ranged from 0 to 8.2 years (2,997 days) and seventy-five patients (87%) had follow up for at least one year. Over a median follow up of 5.4 years (1,986 days), four patients experienced five clinical outcomes; one had esophageal variceal bleeding and a stroke, two others experienced strokes and one developed hepatic decompensation alone in the form of hepatic encephalopathy. All four patients with outcomes were white (non-Hispanic) women and 3 of 4 had advanced fibrosis stage at study entry. One patient previously had breast cancer, while the other three had family histories of lung cancer (two in first degree relatives, one in a second degree relative). Characteristics of subjects with outcomes are shown in Table 2. All four patients with any outcome were analyzed together for the gene expression and DNA methylation analyses.

Table 2. Characteristics of patients who experienced liver or cardiovascular related events during follow up.

Subject Race and
Gender
Age at Study Entry / Liver Biopsy Fibrosis Stage at Study Entry Comorbidities Type of Outcome Time to Outcome
1 White
Female
40 3 Current Smoker Hepatic encephalopathy 5.6 years
2 White
Female
71 4 Diabetes
Hypertension
Variceal bleed
Stroke
3.5 years
3 White
Female
57 1 Diabetes
Hypertension
Current smoker
Stroke 5.0 years
4 White
Female
52 4 Diabetes
Hypertension
Current smoker
Stroke 6.4 years

Gene expression

To evaluate the association between hepatic gene expression and clinical deterioration, we used a composite measure of hepatic decompensation, death and cardiovascular events due to the limited number of outcomes during follow up. Of 54,675 gene expression probe sets analyzed, 42 genes showed significant differential expression (p<0.05) and a two-fold change in expression between patients with and without any outcome. Of these, 35 probe sets were upregulated and 7 were downregulated. The combined 42 gene signature was able to discriminate between patients with and without outcomes (Fig 1, S1 Fig—patients shown by fibrosis stage). Five genes/probes were significantly differentially expressed with p < 0.02 and a two-fold change in expression in patients with and without an outcome. 1,847 were significantly differentially expressed at the p < 0.05 level, regardless of fold-change. Two probes (226517_at, 225285_at) of the branched chain amino-acid transaminase 1 (BCAT1) gene were upregulated (p<0.02; fold change 2.1 and 2.2 respectively) in patients with a clinical outcome. Other differentialy expressed genes of interest include those involved in apoptosis signaling (BCL2A1), one-carbon metabolism (MTHFD2), and cell adhesion (ITGAM, CLDN11). A complete list of the significantly differentially expressed genes appears in Table 3. As shown in Fig 2, BCAT1 expression was more highly upregulated in patients with liver related morbidity as compared to patients with a cardiovascular event or without any outcome.

Fig 1. The 42 gene signature discriminates between NAFLD patients with and without clinical outcomes.

Fig 1

The signature value (y-axis) is calculated as the geometric mean of upregulated probesets minus the geometric mean of downregulated probesets in log domain. Subjects (circles) are grouped by outcome (x-axis).

Table 3. Differentially expressed genes associated with clinical outcomes.

All probes have a false discovery rate of 0.65.

ProbeSet Gene_Symbol Gene Name Dir FC PV
225285_at BCAT1 branched chain amino-acid transaminase 1, cytosolic 2.13 0.01
226517_at BCAT1 branched chain amino-acid transaminase 1, cytosolic 2.20 0.02
205786_s_at ITGAM integrin, alpha M (complement component 3 receptor 3 subunit) 2.33 0.02
206134_at ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like, decysin 1 3.47 0.02
204419_x_at HBG1 /// HBG2 hemoglobin, gamma A /// hemoglobin, gamma G 2.03 0.02
207815_at PF4V1 platelet factor 4 variant 1 3.08 0.02
205681_at BCL2A1 BCL2-related protein A1 2.24 0.02
203196_at ABCC4 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 4 2.09 0.02
228335_at CLDN11 claudin 11 2.65 0.02
201601_x_at IFITM1 /// IFITM2 interferon induced transmembrane protein 1 /// interferon induced transmembrane protein 2 2.03 0.03
211663_x_at PTGDS prostaglandin D2 synthase 21kDa (brain) 2.07 0.03
1554018_at GPNMB glycoprotein (transmembrane) nmb 2.54 0.03
34210_at CD52 CD52 molecule 2.61 0.03
211538_s_at HSPA2 heat shock 70kDa protein 2 2.32 0.03
203088_at FBLN5 fibulin 5 2.04 0.03
205624_at CPA3 carboxypeptidase A3 (mast cell) 2.83 0.03
225681_at CTHRC1 collagen triple helix repeat containing 1 2.44 0.03
212915_at PDZRN3 PDZ domain containing ring finger 3 2.10 0.03
204963_at SSPN sarcospan 2.47 0.03
214837_at ALB albumin 0.48 0.04
208651_x_at CD24 CD24 molecule 3.09 0.04
244181_at 0.48 0.04
204661_at CD52 CD52 molecule 2.22 0.04
201761_at MTHFD2 methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+ dependent) 2, methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase 2.13 0.04
1568920_at 0.49 0.04
213975_s_at LYZ lysozyme 2.18 0.04
204361_s_at SKAP2 src kinase associated phosphoprotein 2 2.05 0.04
206456_at GABRA5 gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor, alpha 5 2.51 0.04
242169_at BHMT2 betaine—homocysteine S-methyltransferase 2 0.47 0.04
214829_at AASS aminoadipate-semialdehyde synthase 0.42 0.04
207332_s_at TFRC transferrin receptor 2.89 0.04
243929_at 0.49 0.04
223235_s_at SMOC2 SPARC related modular calcium binding 2 2.60 0.04
214693_x_at NBPF10 /// NBPF14 /// NBPF26 /// NBPF9 neuroblastoma breakpoint family, member 10 /// neuroblastoma breakpoint family, member 14 /// neuroblastoma breakpoint family, member 26 /// neuroblastoma breakpoint family, member 9 0.49 0.04
230422_at FPR3 formyl peptide receptor 3 2.10 0.04
214768_x_at IGKC /// IGKV2-28 /// IGKV2-28 /// IGKV2D-28 /// IGKV2D-28 immunoglobulin kappa constant /// immunoglobulin kappa variable 2–28 /// — /// immunoglobulin kappa variable 2D-28 /// — 2.29 0.04
202949_s_at FHL2 four and a half LIM domains 2 2.19 0.05
212187_x_at PTGDS prostaglandin D2 synthase 21kDa (brain) 2.27 0.05
201744_s_at LUM lumican 2.68 0.05
225105_at C12orf75 chromosome 12 open reading frame 75 2.90 0.05
204774_at EVI2A ecotropic viral integration site 2A 2.07 0.05
223484_at C15orf48 chromosome 15 open reading frame 48 2.67 0.05

Dir, Direction of gene expression change associated with clinical outcome; PV, uncorrected p-value

Fig 2. Baseline BCAT1 expression is upregulated in NAFLD patients with clinical outcomes.

Fig 2

Scaled expression values in log domain (y-axis) and subjects (circles) grouped by outcome (x-axis).

Next, we evaluated the correlation between BCAT1 expression and other markers of advanced liver disease. After controlling for age, BMI, fibrosis stage, and DM, the two BCAT1 gene probes (226517_at, 225285_at) were significantly upregulated with several histologic markers of advanced disease, including higher fibrosis stage, higher NAFLD activity scores, steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning. BCAT1 expression was also significantly upregulated with clinical factors such as higher glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values (S1 Table) but not BMI, total cholesterol, total bilirubin, albumin, creatinine or a diagnosis of hypertension (results not shown).

DNA methylation and BCAT1

Previously, we established that patterns in human hepatic DNA methylation can distinquish patients with advanced NAFLD fibrosis from those with mild NAFLD fibrosis [12]. Moreover, we found that for many genes, DNA methylation was significantly inversely correlated with gene expression and thus possibly involved in regulation of that expression. Given the association of hepatic gene expression of BCAT1 and NAFLD outcomes, we investigated whether DNA methylation is specifically associated with altered gene expression of BCAT1 and advanced fibrosis and/or NAFLD related morbidity and mortality as a way of validating our gene expression results.

Epigenome-wide DNA methylation data was available for a subgroup of patients with gene expression and outcome data (n = 55; 3 outcomes). Methylation of three of the 34 CpG sites on the Illumina 450K beadchip annotated as BCAT1 (cg09800500, cg07479001, cg1649029) was significantly inversely correlated with the two BCAT1 expression probes predictive of clinical deterioration (Table 4, Fig 3). Given the small sample size, these three CpG sites were not significantly associated with the composite outcome, but were inversely correlated (i.e, the sites are hypomethylated in subjects with outcomes). Utilizing the three significantly correlated CpG sites, we assessed the association between methylation and histologic and clinical factors of advanced NAFLD as well as correlation between methylation and gene expression. BCAT1 hypomethylation was significantly inversely associated with higher fibrosis stage, more hepatocyte ballooning and more lobular inflammation (S1 Table).

Table 4. Correlation matrix of BCAT1 gene expression and DNA methylation at Illumina CpG sites with p-value shown in parentheses.

cg09800500 cg16490209 cg07479001
226517_at -0.45 (5.8 x 10–4) -0.44 (7.5 x 10–4) -0.38 (4.2 x 10–3)
225285_at -0.38 (4.2 x 10–3) -0.45 (6.5 x 10–4) -0.34 (1.1 x 10–2)

Fig 3. Correlation between BCAT1 gene expression and methylation.

Fig 3

3a)– 3c) show the significant inverse correlation between gene expression for one probe on BCAT1 (226517_at) and methylation at three separate CpG sites on BCAT1 (cg09800500, cg16490209 and cg07479001). Negative correlation is highlighted by the linear fit (dashed line) with corresponding correlation coefficients (r values) and statistical significance. 3d) Correlation between gene expression at the previously mentioned BCAT1 probe (226517_at) and DNA methylation improves when the three signficant CpG sites are combined (summed) for analysis. 3e) Two gene expression probes on BCAT1 (226517_at and 225285_at) are well correlated with one another. For all figures, normalized gene expression and methylation M values are shown. For 3a)- 3c), each point represents a paired gene expression and methylation sample. M values are inversely correlated with gene expression values as expected.

Discussion

Given an aging population and its association with obesity and diabetes, the worldwide burden of NAFLD continues to rise. Models forcast continued increased prevalence of not only NAFLD but NASH, cirrhosis and decompensation through 2030 [14]. These unfortunate statistics leave providers grappling with who and how to effectively screen and monitor patients for complications. While it is well known that NASH fibrosis stage correlates with long-term liver related events and death, accurate markers able to predict such events in individuals are lacking. This unmet need can result in poor utilization of resources, missed opportunities for intervention and counseling, and inability to potentially prevent complications such as cardiovascular disease or liver-related decompensation and death.

As a first step towards developing markers to predict NAFLD outcomes, we sought to determine whether specific alterations in hepatic gene expression and methylation at time of index biopsy could identify patients who later experience decompensation or cardiovascular events. We identified 42 differentially expressed genes in the liver at the time of liver biopsy in patients with a future event. The 42 gene signature effectively discriminated between those patients with an outcome (particularly liver decompensation) versus those without. Interestingly, the top two differentially expressed probes in the signature belong to the gene, BCAT1. In this study, BCAT1 was upregulated and hypomethylated in NAFLD patients with clinical decompensation or cardiovascular events compared to those without.

The unbiased finding of BCAT1’s association with clinical deterioration in NAFLD is interesting and relevant. BCAT1 is a cytosolic enzyme that initiates the breakdown of essential branched chain amino acids (BCAA) (leucine, isoleucine and valine) by catalyzing the transformation of α-ketoglutarate to glutamate resulting in the respective branched chain α-keto acids (BCKAs). Thus, BCAT1 along with the other BCAT enzymes are important regulators of metabolism through their influence on the tricarbocylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation [15]. BCAT1 expression has been reported in several tissues including embryonic tissues, brain, ovary, kidney and to a lesser extent in liver, intestine and pancreas [16].

The role of BCAT1 and BCAAs in NASH has been investigated previously. In a small cohort of patients with biopsy proven NAFLD, increased hepatic BCAT1 expression correlated with percentage of steatosis [17]. More recently, elevated levels of hepatocellular cytosolic BCAT1 mRNA and protein were found in NASH patients, whereas those with simple steatosis had no BCAT1 expression [18]. It is unclear, however, whether extrahepatic enzymatic sources may be contributing, or if this abnormal BCAT activity is isolated to NASH livers [19, 20]. In addition, a recent large study assessing the relationship between serum metabolites and future development of NAFLD found that branched chain amino acids were highly associated with NAFLD development, suggesting that discovery of a serum biomarker related to this pathway may be feasible [21].

The mechanisms by which BCAT1 influences outcomes in NAFLD are not precisely understood, but there are several compelling hypotheses. BCAAs mediate signaling in liver tissue, and patients with advanced chronic liver disease have low BCAA levels in liver tissue [22]. In animal models, BCAA supplementation improves steatosis [23]. In humans, BCAA supplementation may improve insulin resistance in patients with NASH cirrhosis [24]. In one study using genomic algorithms to discover NASH biomarkers, serine deficiency and excess glutamate were highly significant. BCAT1 was the only upregulated enzyme linked to glutamate [25]. Potentially, simultaneous upregulation of BCAT1 and downregulation of phosphoserine phosphatase (PSPH) is indicative of an intracellular imbalance of α-ketoglutarate and glutamate, leading to accumulation of glutamate. This points to BCAT1 as a therapeutic target to address metabolic deranagements of NASH [25].

Beyond NASH, BCAT1 appears to have oncogenic properties. BCAT1 is upregulated and functionally required for several malignancies including glioblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colorectal and breast cancers, and chronic myelogenous leukemia [26]. The metabolic role of BCAT1 appears to be related to tissue of origin. In HCC, BCAT1 expression was higher in tumor tissue compared to non-tumor tissue, and was associated with resistance to chemotherapy and poor prognosis [2729]. Augmented amino acid metabolism is associated with clinical aggression in malignant gliomas and appears to sustain growth in breast cancer [30, 31]. Similar to our results, BCAT1 is hypomethylated in some patients with colorectal cancer, and is being investigated as a peripheral biomarker [32].

The strengths of our study includes liver-biopsy proven NAFLD patients with long-term outcome data, an unbiased analysis of gene expression, and the use of DNA methylation data to corroborate the gene expression association we found with BCAT1. Our study also has several limitations. First, given the relatively short follow up and high percentage of patients with mild stages of liver fibrosis, we indentified only a small number of outcomes. This limited our statistical power. Second, we performed a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes, and therefore could have missed diagnoses that occurred outside our center or to patients who were lost to followup. In order to further validate our findings, longer and larger prospective studies of NAFLD patients will need to be performed. Similarly, assessing non-invasive markers from blood or from circulating cells through metabolomics, microRNA or DNA in blood would be the next step in developing easy to obtain prognostic indicators. Whether BCAT1 is upregulated in both liver tissue and peripheral blood is not clear, as it has been more frequently evaluated in liver. Finally, inclusion of metabolomics or genomic markers along with key clinical factors could allow development of an accurate prognostic risk index able to predict morbidity and mortality in NAFLD.

In conclusion, this pilot study suggests that perturbations in hepatic metabolism are associated with future poor outcomes in NAFLD patients. BCAA metabolism via BCAT1 alterations are particularly important and may differentiate those patients at increased risk. Our study provides a nice first step in developing prognostic indicators of key clinical outcomes in NAFLD patients. The hope is that with continued investigation, these markers will allow for appropriate risk stratification, intervention and prevention of poor outcomes of NAFLD.

Supporting information

S1 Table. BCAT1 probe expression and CpG methylation are significantly correlated with several markers of more advanced NAFLD and metabolic syndrome.

Regression coefficients (Coeff) quantify the association between the probe or CpG site and clinical characteristic. The sign of the coefficient indicates direction of the association.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. The 42 gene signature discriminates between NAFLD patients with and without clinical outcomes, and has similar discriminatory ability when subjects are stratified by fibrosis stage.

The signature value (y-axis) is calculated as the geometric mean of upregulated probesets minus the geometric mean of downregulated probesets in log domain. Subjects are grouped by outcome (x-axis) and separated by fibrosis stage at baseline liver biopsy (circle: Stage F0-F1 Fibrosis, Mild; x: Stage F3-F4 Fibrosis, Advanced). Gene expression is up regulated in NAFLD patients with cardiovascular and liver-related outcomes.

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Yiping Pan for her assistance with data management and Ms. Stephanie Buie, clinical research coordinator for patient sample collection. We also thank our patients who volunteered to participate in our Duke NAFLD Clinical Database and Biorepository, without whom this study would not have been possible.

Abbreviations

NAFLD

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

BCAT1

branched chain amino-acid transaminase 1

DM

diabetes mellitus

MRE

magnetic resonance elastography

LT

liver transplantation

BMI

body mass index

ALT

alanine aminotransferase

AST

aspartate aminotransferase

BCAA

branched chain amino acids

BCKA

branched chain α-keto acids

Data Availability

Gene expression and methylation data are available through GEO at GSE31803. Clinical data will be made available after acceptance through the Duke NAFLD Biorepository for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Florence McAlister Professor of Medicine Endowment Fund, National Institutes of Health 5RC2-AA019399 (PI: Diehl); American College of Gastroenterology Junior Faculty Development Award (2015; PI: Moylan). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, Hardy T, Henry L, Eslam M, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(1):11–20. Epub 2017/09/21. 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bellentani S. The epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2017;37 Suppl 1:81–4. 10.1111/liv.13299 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zelber-Sagi S, Shoham D, Zvibel I, Abu-Abeid S, Shibolet O, Fishman S. Predictors for advanced fibrosis in morbidly obese non-alcoholic fatty liver patients. World J Hepatol. 2017;9(2):91–8. 10.4254/wjh.v9.i2.91 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5241533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM. Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(3):274–85. Epub 2011/06/01. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04724.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, George J, Farrell GC, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology. 2007;45(4):846–54. 10.1002/hep.21496 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Raszeja-Wyszomirska J, Szymanik B, Lawniczak M, Kajor M, Chwist A, Milkiewicz P, et al. Validation of the BARD scoring system in Polish patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:67 10.1186/1471-230X-10-67 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2905324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ruffillo G, Fassio E, Alvarez E, Landeira G, Longo C, Dominguez N, et al. Comparison of NAFLD fibrosis score and BARD score in predicting fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;54(1):160–3. 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sun W, Cui H, Li N, Wei Y, Lai S, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of FIB-4 index, NAFLD fibrosis score and BARD score for prediction of advanced fibrosis in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis study. Hepatol Res. 2016;46(9):862–70. Epub 2016/01/15. 10.1111/hepr.12647 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guajardo-Salinas GE, Hilmy A. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and utility of FIBROspect II to detect liver fibrosis in morbidly obese Hispano-American patients undergoing gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1647–53. Epub 2009/12/04. 10.1007/s11695-009-0027-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Francque S, Verrijken A, Caron S, Prawitt J, Paumelle R, Derudas B, et al. PPARalpha gene expression correlates with severity and histological treatment response in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2015;63(1):164–73. Epub 2015/02/24. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moylan CA, Pang H, Dellinger A, Suzuki A, Garrett ME, Guy CD, et al. Hepatic gene expression profiles differentiate presymptomatic patients with mild versus severe nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2014;59(2):471–82. 10.1002/hep.26661 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3982589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murphy SK, Yang H, Moylan CA, Pang H, Dellinger A, Abdelmalek MF, et al. Relationship between methylome and transcriptome in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(5):1076–87. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.07.047 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3805742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H, Ladd-Acosta C, Feinberg AP, Hansen KD, et al. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(10):1363–9. Epub 2014/01/31. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4016708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):123–33. Epub 2017/08/13. 10.1002/hep.29466 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5767767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Papathanassiu AE, Ko JH, Imprialou M, Bagnati M, Srivastava PK, Vu HA, et al. BCAT1 controls metabolic reprogramming in activated human macrophages and is associated with inflammatory diseases. Nat Commun. 2017;8:16040 Epub 2017/07/13. 10.1038/ncomms16040 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5510229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adeva MM, Calvino J, Souto G, Donapetry C. Insulin resistance and the metabolism of branched-chain amino acids in humans. Amino Acids. 2012;43(1):171–81. Epub 2011/10/11. 10.1007/s00726-011-1088-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Greco D, Kotronen A, Westerbacka J, Puig O, Arkkila P, Kiviluoto T, et al. Gene expression in human NAFLD. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;294(5):G1281–7. Epub 2008/04/05. 10.1152/ajpgi.00074.2008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lake AD, Novak P, Shipkova P, Aranibar N, Robertson DG, Reily MD, et al. Branched chain amino acid metabolism profiles in progressive human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Amino Acids. 2015;47(3):603–15. Epub 2014/12/23. 10.1007/s00726-014-1894-9 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4329055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Suryawan A, Hawes JW, Harris RA, Shimomura Y, Jenkins AE, Hutson SM. A molecular model of human branched-chain amino acid metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(1):72–81. Epub 1998/07/17. 10.1093/ajcn/68.1.72 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sweatt AJ, Wood M, Suryawan A, Wallin R, Willingham MC, Hutson SM. Branched-chain amino acid catabolism: unique segregation of pathway enzymes in organ systems and peripheral nerves. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004;286(1):E64–76. Epub 2003/09/11. 10.1152/ajpendo.00276.2003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kaikkonen JE, Wurtz P, Suomela E, Lehtovirta M, Kangas AJ, Jula A, et al. Metabolic profiling of fatty liver in young and middle-aged adults: Cross-sectional and prospective analyses of the Young Finns Study. Hepatology. 2017;65(2):491–500. Epub 2016/10/25. 10.1002/hep.28899 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5299457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tajiri K, Shimizu Y. Branched-chain amino acids in liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(43):7620–9. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7620 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3837260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Honda T, Ishigami M, Luo F, Lingyun M, Ishizu Y, Kuzuya T, et al. Branched-chain amino acids alleviate hepatic steatosis and liver injury in choline-deficient high-fat diet induced NASH mice. Metabolism. 2017;69:177–87. 10.1016/j.metabol.2016.12.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miyake T, Abe M, Furukawa S, Tokumoto Y, Toshimitsu K, Ueda T, et al. Long-term branched-chain amino acid supplementation improves glucose tolerance in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis. Intern Med. 2012;51(16):2151–5. Epub 2012/08/15. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mardinoglu A, Agren R, Kampf C, Asplund A, Uhlen M, Nielsen J. Genome-scale metabolic modelling of hepatocytes reveals serine deficiency in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3083 10.1038/ncomms4083 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hattori A, Tsunoda M, Konuma T, Kobayashi M, Nagy T, Glushka J, et al. Cancer progression by reprogrammed BCAA metabolism in myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2017;545(7655):500–4. Epub 2017/05/18. 10.1038/nature22314 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5554449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang HG, Xie R, Shen P, Huang XD, Ji GZ, Yang XZ. BCAT1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2016;40(5):e55–e6. Epub 2016/04/29. 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.03.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu M, Liu Q, Jia Y, Tu K, Yao Y, Guo C. BCAT1 promotes tumor cell migration and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2016;12(4):2648–56. Epub 2016/08/08. 10.3892/ol.2016.4969 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5038498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zheng YH, Hu WJ, Chen BC, Grahn TH, Zhao YR, Bao HL, et al. BCAT1, a key prognostic predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma, promotes cell proliferation and induces chemoresistance to cisplatin. Liver Int. 2016;36(12):1836–47. Epub 2016/06/20. 10.1111/liv.13178 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thewes V, Simon R, Hlevnjak M, Schlotter M, Schroeter P, Schmidt K, et al. The branched-chain amino acid transaminase 1 sustains growth of antiestrogen-resistant and ERα-negative breast cancer. Oncogene. 2017. Epub 2017/03/20. 10.1038/onc.2017.32 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Panosyan EH, Lasky JL, Lin HJ, Lai A, Hai Y, Guo X, et al. Clinical aggressiveness of malignant gliomas is linked to augmented metabolism of amino acids. J Neurooncol. 2016;128(1):57–66. Epub 2016/02/27. 10.1007/s11060-016-2073-5 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mitchell SM, Ross JP, Drew HR, Ho T, Brown GS, Saunders NF, et al. A panel of genes methylated with high frequency in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:54 10.1186/1471-2407-14-54 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3924905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. BCAT1 probe expression and CpG methylation are significantly correlated with several markers of more advanced NAFLD and metabolic syndrome.

Regression coefficients (Coeff) quantify the association between the probe or CpG site and clinical characteristic. The sign of the coefficient indicates direction of the association.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. The 42 gene signature discriminates between NAFLD patients with and without clinical outcomes, and has similar discriminatory ability when subjects are stratified by fibrosis stage.

The signature value (y-axis) is calculated as the geometric mean of upregulated probesets minus the geometric mean of downregulated probesets in log domain. Subjects are grouped by outcome (x-axis) and separated by fibrosis stage at baseline liver biopsy (circle: Stage F0-F1 Fibrosis, Mild; x: Stage F3-F4 Fibrosis, Advanced). Gene expression is up regulated in NAFLD patients with cardiovascular and liver-related outcomes.

(TIFF)

Data Availability Statement

Gene expression and methylation data are available through GEO at GSE31803. Clinical data will be made available after acceptance through the Duke NAFLD Biorepository for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES