Skip to main content
Microbes and Environments logoLink to Microbes and Environments
. 2018 Sep 29;33(3):340–344. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME18071

Improvements in Bacterial Primers to Enhance Selective SSU rRNA Gene Amplification of Plant-associated Bacteria by Applying the LNA Oligonucleotide-PCR Clamping Technique

Makoto Ikenaga 1, Shohei Katsuragi 2, Yoshihiro Handa 3, Hiroshi Katsumata 3, Naoya Chishaki 1, Tomohiro Kawauchi 4, Masao Sakai 1,*
PMCID: PMC6167120  PMID: 30146542

Abstract

PCR clamping by locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotides is an effective technique for selectively amplifying the community SSU rRNA genes of plant–associated bacteria. However, the original primer set often shows low amplification efficiency. In order to improve this efficiency, new primers were designed at positions to compete with LNA oligonucleotides. Three new sets displayed higher amplification efficiencies than the original; however, efficiency varied among the primer sets. Two new sets appeared to be available in consideration of bacterial profiles by next-generation sequencing. One new set, KU63f and KU1494r, may be applicable to the selective gene amplification of plant-associated bacteria.

Keywords: PCR clamping, SSU rRNA genes, plant–associated bacteria, LNA oligonucleotide, KU63f and KU1494r


The simultaneous DNA extraction of plant organelle (mitochondria and plastid) SSU rRNA genes is a major limitation associated with amplifying the community SSU rRNA genes of plant–associated bacteria (7, 11, 12, 19, 26). A blocking technique to avoid the concomitant amplification of undesirable sequences (2, 18, 23) and ultra-density gradient centrifugation (9) are useful for obtaining bacterial DNA fractions. Sakai and Ikenaga (21) reported a blocking technique to inhibit the amplification of plant organelle SSU rRNA genes by applying the peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-PCR clamping technique. They subsequently employed locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotides instead of PNA oligomers to increase the amplification efficiency of plant–associated bacterial SSU rRNA genes (1315). A PCR clamping technique using LNA oligonucleotides is advantageous because it may selectively amplify almost the full length of bacterial SSU rRNA genes, and amplicons may then be used in a plant microbiome analysis, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) (27). However, the amplification efficiency of the primer set used in this approach, modified 63f and 1492r, is often low, and this has been attributed to 1) differences in Tm values between forward and reverse primers, 2) the double T at the 3′ end of the 1492r primer, and 3) complementary sequences at the 3′ ends of both primers. Furthermore, modified 63f displays lower coverage than the universal primers specific for bacteria (13). To improve amplification efficiency, three new forward primers and one new reverse primer were designed at positions to compete with LNA oligonucleotides specific for plant organelle (mitochondria and plastid) SSU rRNA genes. The LNA oligonucleotides used herein were described in our previous studies (13, 14), and their sequences and properties were shown in supplementary Table S2. The amplification efficiencies of the newly designed primer sets were compared for their respective PCR products prepared from the roots of rice, potato, soybean, and turnip green. NGS was also applied to establish the recommended primer set for microbiome analyses of plant–associated bacteria.

The sequences of bacterial SSU rRNA genes were obtained from representatives of 32 phyla from RDP release 11 (https://rdp.cme.msu.edu) in consideration of phylogenetic diversity. The sequences of type strains were mainly collected. Bacterial genes were aligned together with modified 63f or 1492r. The numbers of bacterial genes used for alignment were 12,392 and 14,290 for the forward and reverse sides, respectively. Based on alignment, three new forward primers, KU63f, KU64f, and KU68f, were designed by improving the modified 63f primer at the position to compete with LNA oligonucleotides on the forward side (Fig. 1A). On the other hand, one new reverse primer, KU1494r, was designed by removing double T at the 3′ end of the 1492r primer on the reverse side (Fig. 1B). The properties of the newly designed primers are listed in Table 1. The original set of modified 63f and 1492r displayed the maximal difference of 10°C in Tm values, whereas differences in Tm values for the three new sets, KU63f and KU1494r, KU64f and KU1494r, and KU68f and KU1494r, were slightly lower at 5, 7, and 9°C, respectively. Regarding primer coverage, modified 63f has been reported to show 76.3% coverage, and this percentage is lower than that of universal primers specific for bacteria, as calculated using ROSE version 1.1.2 (3). For example, the coverages of the common bacterial primers, 68f, 341f, 517f, 799f, 518r, 805r, 907r, and 1390r, were 74.2, 89.1, 89.9, 81.9, 83.8, 91.1, 84.4, and 89.2%, respectively (supplementary Table S1). However, the newly designed KU63f, KU64f, and KU1494r showed similar coverages of 80.6, 80.0, and 81.7%, respectively. In contrast, KU68f displayed 73.0%, which was lower than that of modified 63f. As shown in Table 2, the modified forward primers 63f, KU63f, and KU64f and reverse primers 1492r and KU1494r have complementary sequences at their 3′ ends, which led to less objective PCR products after the exponential generation of primer dimers. Hot start DNA polymerase is considered to be effective for avoiding this drawback, while KU68f was additionally designed to avoid the formation of primer dimers by shifting the annealing position toward the extension side.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Sequence alignment data of original primer and bacterial SSU rRNA genes to design new bacterial primers at a position to compete with LNA oligonucleotides

Highlighted DNA bases in grey indicate the region competing with LNA oligonucleotides. Symbols ▨, □, ■, and Inline graphic indicated A, T, G, and C, respectively.

Table 1.

Properties of newly designed bacterial primers, which were designed by improving the original primer set of modified 63f and 1492r

Primer 5′-Sequence-3′ Tm value Coverage Size Position in E. coli References
Forward Primer
 modified 63f YRKGCYTWAYACATGCAAGTC 58–67°C 76.3% 21mer 43–63 Ikenaga and Sakai (13)
 KU63f GCYTWAYACATGCAAGTC 54–60°C 80.6% 18mer 46–63 This study
 KU64f GCYTWAYACATGCAAGTCG 57–62°C 80.0% 19mer 46–64 This study
 KU68f AYACATGCAAGTCGARCG 58–64°C 73.0% 18mer 51–68 This study

Reverse Primer
 1492r GGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT 57–60°C 81.2% 19mer 1510–1492 Ikenaga and Sakai (13)
 KU1494r GGYTACCTTGTTACGAC 55–58°C 81.7% 17mer 1510–1494 This study

Y=C or T; R=A or G; K=T or G; W=A or T

Table 2.

Positions of complementary sequences at the 3′ end between forward and reverse primers

Primer Sequence
modified 63f 5′ Y R K G C Y T W A Y A C A T G C A A G T C 3′
KU63f 5′ G C Y T W A Y A C A T G C A A G T C 3′
KU64f 5′ G C Y T W A Y A C A T G C A A G T C G 3′
KU68f 5′ A Y A C A T G C A A G T C G A R C G 3′

1492r 3′ T T C A G C A T T G T T C C A T Y G G 5′
KU1494r 3′ C A G C A T T G T T C C A T Y G G 5′

Inline graphic” indicates the positions showing complimentary sequences.

Rice (Oryza sativa cv. Koshihikari), potato (Solanum tuberosum cv. Nishiyutaka), soybean (Glycine max cv. Fukuyutaka), and turnip green (Brassica rapa var. perviridis Hamami No. 2) were cultivated in potted soil. Cultivation procedures were the same as those described by Ikenaga et al. (13, 14). The roots of rice and soybean were collected at the seedling stage, while those of potato and turnip green were collected at the harvest stage. Respective roots were treated with 0.5% SDS, washed in sterilized distilled water to remove attachments, such as soil particles, and then ground to prepare suspensions containing 0.25 g of fresh roots mL−1. DNA extraction was performed from 0.5-mL aliquots of root suspensions using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) with a phenol/chloroform treatment. Extracted DNA was stored at −20°C before use.

The SSU rRNA genes of plant–associated bacteria were selectively amplified by applying the PCR clamping technique with the following LNA oligonucleotides for the respective root DNA extracts: Mit63a, Mit1492a, Pla63a, and Pla1492a for rice; Mit63a, Mit1492a, Pla63b, and Pla1492b for soybean; Mit63a, Mit1492a, Pla63c, and Pla1492b for potato, and Mit63b, Mit1492a, Pla63a, and Pla1492b for turnip green (15). The final concentration of each LNA oligonucleotide was 4.0 μM. The sequences of the respective LNA oligonucleotides and their properties were listed in supplementary Table S2. The four combinations of the primer sets used for the respective DNA extracts were as follows: 1) modified 63f and 1492r, 2) KU63f and KU1494r, 3) KU64f and KU1494r, and 4) KU68f and KU1494r. The Premix ExTaq™ Hot Start Version (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) was used for PCR, which was performed under the following conditions: 94°C for 3 min as the initial denaturation followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 70°C for 30 s, 54°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min with the final extension step of 72°C for 8 min. Two microliters of PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1.2% agarose gel with a 100-bp marker.

As shown in Fig. 2, PCR products amplified with the original primer set, modified 63f and 1492r, displayed low band intensities for the four types of root samples examined. In contrast, the intensities of the PCR products amplified with the three new primer sets, KU63f and KU1494r, KU64f and KU1494r, and KU68f and KU1494r, were higher. The products of KU68f and KU1494r showed the highest intensity, followed by the products of KU63f and KU1494r and those of KU64f and KU1494r. This order of efficiency appeared to be attributed to the number of complementary bases at the 3′ ends of the forward and reverse primers. As described above, KU68f was designed to avoid the exponential generation of primer dimers. Even though the difference in Tm values was 9°C at the maximum between KU68f and KU1494r, this primer set displayed the highest intensities of PCR products. In contrast, KU63f and KU1494r as well as KU64f and KU1494r retained complementary sequences at their 3′ ends (Table 2). However, the five original complementary bases were decreased to three and four complementary bases for KU63f and KU1494r and for KU64f and KU1494r, respectively. Thus, band intensities were inversely proportional to the number of complementary bases. This result suggested that the removal of double T at the 3′ end of 1492r to design KU1494r also contributed to the increase in PCR efficiency.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

PCR products of respective root–associated bacterial SSU rRNA genes by applying the PCR clamping technique by LNA oligonucleotides Lanes 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate the products amplified with modified 63f and 1492r, KU63f and KU1494r, KU64f and KU1494r, and KU68f and KU1494r, respectively.

An NGS analysis for the V3 and V4 regions of bacterial SSU rRNA genes was performed using a paired–end method with MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The set of the primers 341f (Escherichia coli positions 341–357; 5′-CCT ACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and 805r (E. coli positions 805–785; 5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) (16) with adaptor sequences followed by index sequences was used for the respective purified amplicons. The Qiime pipeline (6) was used for a microbiome analysis after removing low quality and chimeric sequences. The sequences that passed preprocessing were clustered in operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% similarity. The procedure described was performed by Bioengineering Lab. (http://www.gikenbio.com/). The abundance rates of the respective bacterial phyla examined with the four primer sets are shown in Fig. 3. The OTUs that accounted for more than 1% of the total sequence number were considered, whereas those that represented less than 1% were classified as “other bacteria”.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Abundance ratio (%) of plant root–associated bacteria.

Phyla accounting for less than 1% were compiled as “other bacteria”. Lanes 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate the microbiomes prepared by modified 63f and 1492r, KU63f and KU1494r, KU64f and KU1494r, and KU68f and KU1494r, respectively.

As shown in Fig. 3, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the dominant bacterial phyla, with Actinobacteria being the next dominant phylum in the four examined plant roots irrespective of the difference in the primer set. Acidobacteria were also widespread in turnip green. However, the abundance ratios of the respective bacterial phyla varied depending on the primer sets. The set of KU68f and KU1494r displayed the highest efficiency in PCR amplification; however, Firmicutes sequences were more likely to be preferentially amplified with this set, which resulted in a reduction in the detection of other phyla based on the abundance ratio. As shown in Table 3, the coverage of the last four DNA bases at the 3′ end of KU68f, corresponding to positions 65 to 68 in E. coli, displayed nearly 80% or consistently higher percentages for Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, TM7, and Verrucomicrobia. In contrast, DNA bases showing low coverage in this region were observed for the other phyla; however, all bases of TM6 and two bases of Planctomycetes displayed low coverage throughout positions 60 to 68. Bru et al. (5) and Wu et al. (24) demonstrated that PCR amplification was inhibited if a single mismatch occurred within the last three to four nucleotides of the 3′ end of the primer, even when the annealing temperature was decreased for optimal conditions. Therefore, an amplification bias may have occurred due to a mismatch within the last four bases at the 3′ end. Consequently, Firmicutes, which was generally observed as the dominant phylum in the microbiome analysis of plant–associated bacteria as well as Proteobacteria (1, 10, 20, 25, 28), was preferentially amplified.

Table 3.

Coverage (%) of DNA bases at the 3′ end position of forward primers in respective bacterial phyla, which constituted more than 1% in the NSG analysis

E. coli position 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68
DNA base A G T C G A R C G
Proteobacteria 92.8 93.9 94.4 94.3 94.6 87.1 94.1 94.2 94.7
Firmicutes 85.8 87.4 87.7 82.5 90.1 86.6 90.4 86.3 84.7
Actinobacteria 94.7 95.3 95.8 95.6 96.1 95.1 96.4 96.7 97.1
Acidobacteria 81.3 84.8 84.8 86.1 86.1 59.1 88.7 86.1 87.0
Bacteroidetes 89.0 92.9 83.3 93.1 93.6 85.6 93.9 38.9 95.4
Chloroflexi 88.5 92.3 91.3 91.3 92.8 73.6 91.8 92.3 91.8
TM7 86.9 86.4 92.8 87.7 90.3 84.7 90.7 85.2 89.8
TM6 58.3 60.4 58.3 58.3 59.4 59.4 60.4 58.3 59.4
Verrucomicrobia 85.9 87.6 88.0 86.7 88.4 79.5 87.6 87.6 88.0
Planctomycetes 53.3 93.1 93.7 93.3 96.2 37.4 96.0 85.1 83.8

Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were also observed as the dominant phyla when the primer sets KU63f and KU1494r and KU64f and KU1494r were used (Fig. 3). However, these sets did not show a bias in favor of Firmicutes, and the abundance ratios of other phyla were higher than those in the experiment when the primer set KU68f and KU1494r was used. In addition, DNA bases showing low coverage were not detected in the last four bases at the 3′ end, similar to the case of KU68f, except for one base in Planctomycetes, suggesting that both primer sets are applicable to investigations of the microbiome of plant–associated bacteria.

The primer set KU63f and KU1494r displayed higher amplification efficiency than original modified 63f and 1492r, and the coverage of KU63f was greater than that of modified 63f. These two primer sets showed more similar abundance ratios not only at the phylum level, but also at more detailed levels such as order, class and genus levels than when KU64f and KU1494r was used (Fig. 3). Data supporting this result was also obtained in a cluster analysis under the Black Box program (http://aoki2.si.gunma-u.ac.jp/bb0/BlackBox0.html) (Fig. 4). This was because KU63f was designed by removing three DNA bases at the 5′ end of modified 63f to increase coverage. Therefore, the remaining sequence was identical between KU63f and modified 63f until the 3′ end. As reported by Bru et al. (5) and Wu et al. (24), the latter half of the primer sequence at the 3′ end side significantly influenced primer annealing at the objective position during PCR cycles (4, 8, 17, 22). Therefore, these two sets were assumed to yield similar abundance ratios in bacterial profiles. In the present study, we also demonstrated that the coverage of modified 63f was lower than that of other universal bacterial primers. However, since lower coverage was caused by three DNA bases at the 5′ end of modified 63f, this primer was not expected to give a stronger bias in PCR amplification than that estimated from the calculated coverage. The plant microbiomes prepared with the KU63f and KU1494r and modified 63f and 1492r primers sets may be compared, even with this difference in PCR efficiency.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Cluster analysis of respective root–associated bacteria

The figure was created based on the NGS profiled in Fig. 3. Lanes 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate the microbiomes prepared by modified 63f and 1492r, KU63f and KU1494r, KU64f and KU1494r, and KU68f and KU1494r, respectively.

In summary, three new forward primers and one new reverse primer were designed at positions to compete with LNA oligonucleotides by improving the original primer set of modified 63f and 1492r in order to selectively PCR-amplify the SSU rRNA genes of plant associated–bacteria. All new primer sets displayed higher amplification efficiencies than that of the original set. However, these efficiencies varied depending on the primer sets; KU68f and KU1494r showed the highest intensity of PCR products, followed by the products of KU63f and KU1494r and those of KU64f and KU1494r. The use of the primer set KU63f and KU1494r 1) did not show a bias in favor of Firmicutes, as observed with KU68f and KU1494r, and 2) displayed higher amplification efficacy than KU64f and KU1494r. Consequently, KU63f and KU1494r may be applicable to the selective gene amplification of plant–associated bacteria.

The nucleotide sequences obtained in the present study were registered to Genebank under accession number PRJDB6970.

Supplementary Material

33_340_s1.pdf (79.4KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Akinsanya M.A., Goh J.K., Lim S.P., Ting A.S.Y. Metagenomics study of endophytic bacteria in Aloe vera using next-generation technology. Genomics Data. 2015;6:159–163. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arenz B.E., Schlatter D.C., Bradeen J.M., Kinkel L.L. Blocking primers reduce co–amplification of plant DNA when studying bacterial endophyte communities. J Microbiol Meth. 2015;117:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ashelford K.E., Weightman A.J., Fry J.C. PROMEROSE: a computer program for generating and estimating the phylogenetic range of 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes and primers in conjunction with the RDP–II database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3481–3489. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ayyadevara S., Thaden J.J., Reis R.R.J. Discrimination of primer 3′-nucleotide mismatch by Taq DNA polymerase during polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem. 2000;284:11–18. doi: 10.1006/abio.2000.4635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bru D., Martin–Laurent F., Philippot L. Quantification of the detrimental effect of a single primer–template mismatch by real time PCR using the 16S rRNA gene as an example. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:1660–1663. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02403-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Caporaso J.G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., et al. QIIME allows analysis of high–throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garbeva P., Overbeek L.S., Vuurde J.W., Elsas J.D. Analysis of endophytic bacterial communities of potato by plating and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rDNA based PCR fragments. Microb Ecol. 2001;41:369–383. doi: 10.1007/s002480000096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huang M.M., Arnheim N., Goodman M.F. Extension of base mispairs by Taq DNA polymerase: implications for single nucleotide discrimination in PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:4567–457. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.17.4567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ikeda S., Fuji S., Sato T., Ytow N., Ezura H., Minamisawa K. Community analysis of seed–associated microbes in forage crops using culture–independent methods. Microbes Environ. 2006;21:112–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ikeda S., Sasaki K., Okubo T., et al. Low nitrogen fertilization adapts rice root microbiome to low nutrient environment by changing biogeochemical functions. Microbes Environ. 2014;29:50–59. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME13110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ikenaga M., Muraoka Y., Toyota K., Kimura M. Community structure of the microbiota associated with nodal roots of rice plants along with the growth stages: estimation by PCR–RFLP analysis. Biol Fertil Soils. 2002;36:397–404. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ikenaga M., Asakawa S., Muraoka Y., Kimura M. Bacterial communities associated with nodal roots of rice plants along with the growth stages: estimation by PCR–DGGE and sequence analyses. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2003;49:591–602. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ikenaga M., Sakai M. Application of locked nucleic acid (LNA)—PCR clamping technique to selectively PCR amplify the SSU rRNA genes of bacteria in Investigating the plant–associated community structures. Microbes Environ. 2014;29:286–295. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ikenaga M., Tabuchi M., Oyama T., Akagi I., Sakai M. Development of LNA oligonucleotide–PCR clamping technique in investigating the community structures of plant–associated bacteria. Biosci, Biotechnol, Biochem. 2015;79:1556–1566. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2015.1038213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ikenaga M., Kawauchi T., Sakai M. Culture–independent molecular technique to investigate the community structures of plant–associated bacteria, and the potential to develop the related research. Soil Microorganisms. 2016;70:23–34. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Klindworth A., Pruesse E., Schweer T., Peplies J., Quast C., Horn M., Glöckner F.O. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kwok S., Kellogg D.E., Mckinney N., Spasic D., Goda L., Levenson C., Sninsky J.J. Effects of primer–template mismatches on the polymerase chain reaction: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 model studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:999–1005. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.4.999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lundberg D.S., Yourstone S., Mieczkowski P., Jones C.D., Dangl J.L. Practical innovations for high–throughput amplicon sequencing. Nat Methods. 2013;10:999–1002. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marilley L., Aragno M. Phylogenetic diversity of bacterial communities differing in degree of proximity of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens roots. Appl Soil Ecol. 1999;13:127–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Portillo M. del C., Franquès J., Araque I., Reguant C., Bordons A. Bacterial diversity of Grenache and Carignan grape surface from different vineyards at Priorat wine region (Catalonia, Spain) Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;219:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sakai M., Ikenaga M. Application of peptide nucleic acid (PNA)–PCR clamping technique to investigate the community structures of rhizobacteria associated with plant roots. J Microbiol Meth. 2013;92:281–288. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.09.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sarkar G., Cassady J., Bottema C.D., Sommer S.S. Characterization of polymerase chain reaction amplification of specific alleles. Anal Biochem. 1990;186:64–68. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90573-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vestheim H., Jarman S.N. Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples—a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs. Front Zool. 2008;5:12. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-5-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wu J.H., Hong P.Y., Liu W.T. Quantitative effects of position and type of single mismatch on single base primer extension. J Microbiol Meth. 2009;77:267–275. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xia Y., Greissworth E., Mucci C., Williams M.A., Debolt S. Characterization of culturable bacterial endophytes of switch-grass (Panicum virgatum L.) and their capacity to influence plant growth. GCB Bioenergy. 2013;5:674–682. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang C.H., Crowley D.E. Rhizosphere microbial community structure in relation to root location and plant iron nutritional status. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:345–351. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.1.345-351.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yu Z.H., Yu J., Ikenaga M., Sakai M., Liu X.B., Wang G.H. Characterization of root–associated bacterial community structures in soybean and corn using locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotide–PCR clamping and 454 pyrosequencing. J Integr Agric. 2016;15:1883–1891. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang M., Powell C.A., Guo Y., Benyon L., Duan Y. Characterization of the microbial community structure in Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus-infected citrus plants treated with antibiotics in the field. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

33_340_s1.pdf (79.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Microbes and Environments are provided here courtesy of Nakanishi Printing

RESOURCES