Abstract
This review aims to provide a brief historical overview of the feto-maternal immunological relationship, which profoundly influences the outcome of pregnancy. The initial question posed in the 1950s by Medawar [Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1953; 7: 320–338] was based on the assumption that the maternal immune system recognizes the fetus as an allograft. Indeed, based on the association between HLA-matching and spontaneous miscarriage, it became obvious that immunological recognition of pregnancy is required for a successful gestation. The restricted expression of polymorphic HLA antigens on the trophoblast, together with the presence of nonpolymorphic MHC products, excludes recognition by both T and NK cells of trophoblast-presented antigens; however, γδ T cells, which constitute the majority of decidual T cells, are likely candidates. Indeed, a high number of activated, progesterone receptor-expressing γδ T cells are present in the peripheral blood of healthy pregnant women and, in the presence of progesterone, these cells secrete an immunomodulatory protein called progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF). As early as in the peri-implantation period, the embryo communicates with the maternal immune system via PIBF containing extracellular vesicles. PIBF contributes to the dominance of Th2-type reactivity which characterizes normal pregnancy by inducing increased production of Th2 cytokines. The high expression of this molecule in the decidua might be one of the reasons for the low cytotoxic activity of decidual NK cells.
Keywords: Pregnancy, Progesterone, Progesterone-induced blocking factor
Significance of the Study
Reproduction is one of the most important biological processes, so much so that when a pathway is disrupted there are alternative mechanisms to compensate for the loss of function. Because of this complexity, it is not easy to cover all aspects and mechanisms that allow the fetus to survive in the potentially hostile immunological environment. Therefore, this review focuses on the role of progesterone in feto-maternal immunological interactions and attempts to highlight the recent, as well as the most important, findings of the past decades.
Immunological Recognition of Pregnancy
The concept of pregnancy as an “immunological paradox” was first presented by Peter Medawar [1] in 1953, and ever since then scientists have been attempting to answer the question of why the semiallogeneic fetus is not rejected by its mother. A plausible and simple explanation would be that fetal antigens are hidden or masked, and therefore the maternal immune system does not recognize the presence of the fetus. This concept, however, has been disproved by the demonstration of anti-placental and anti-paternal antibodies in the sera of multiparous women [2], suggesting that pregnancy is recognized by the maternal immune system and the immune reaction does not harm the fetus.
In the 1980s it became evident that maternal recognition of fetal antigens and consequent activation of the maternal immune system are not just harmless but they also required for a normal pregnancy outcome. In abortion-prone murine strain combinations, pregnancy can be rescued by nonspecific immunostimulation of the pregnant female [3] or by immunization of the mother with paternal strain spleen cells [4]. In humans, HLA matching between the parents has been shown to be associated with spontaneous abortion [5]. To further study the relationship between HLA matching and pregnancy outcomes, Ober [6], conducted prospective, population-based studies on Hutterites, who constitute a highly inbred population in which parents often match for HLA [7]. These studies revealed that a high rate of similarity between maternal and paternal HLA types might be a risk factor for pregnancy failure [6].
The above data suggest that recognition of fetal antigens is crucial for the maternal immune system to initiate a series of events that will eventually create a favorable immunological environment for the embryo and the developing fetus.
Expression of HLA Antigens on the Trophoblast
This raises the question of how fetally derived antigens are presented and what immune cell types recognize these antigens.
Early studies showed that the trophoblast is resistant to killing by both NK cells and T cell; however, in the presence of IL-2 the cells became cytotoxic, suggesting that the inability to lyse the target cells is not due to an inherent defect in the killing machinery but rather a failure of lymphocytes to recognize trophoblast-presented antigens [8, 9]. The chorionic villous trophoblast, the principal form of trophoblast in maternal contact, is devoid of HLA antigens [10-12]. On the other hand, extra-villous cytotrophoblast cells do react with antibodies to HLA class I framework antigens [13]. Later, however, it became evident that the extra-villous trophoblast cells that react with these antibodies fail to react with anti-HLA-A or anti-HLA-B antibodies, suggesting that the expression of polymorphic MHC antigens by trophoblast cells may be restricted to HLA-C [14].
In addition to HLA-C, the trophoblast also expresses the nonpolymorphic HLA antigens HLA-G and HLA-E. While HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-E, and HLA-G are present in individual trophoblast populations at the transcriptional level, only HLA-C, HLA-G, and HLA-E are translated to proteins [15, 16]. HLA-E serves as the ligand of the CD94/NKG2A/B inhibitory receptor present on the majority of decidual NK cells [17-20], which partly explains the failure of NK cells to lyse the trophoblast. On the other hand, the absence of polymorphic HLA antigens limits the recognition, by maternal T cells, of trophoblast-presented antigens. Because cytotoxic T cells need to recognize both their target antigen and self HLA in order to be effective [21, 22], the cellular immune response to chorionic villous trophoblast antigens would be blocked through the lack of maternal HLA on this tissue [23]. γδ T cells constitute a major population among decidual lymphocytes. Seventy percent of decidual T cells express γδδTCR, and the majority of these cells are activated [24-26]. Because γδ T cells are able to recognize antigens without MHC restriction [27], they are also plausible candidates for recognition of the fetal antigens presented by the trophoblast. The number of γδ T cells is significantly increased in the peripheral blood of healthy pregnant women, and almost all of these cells express progesterone receptors (PR), suggesting prior activation [28, 29]. Based on these findings, it is likely that γ/δ cells play a role in the recognition of fetal antigens.
Progesterone-Dependent Immunomodulation
The biological activities of progesterone are mediated by genomic pathways via nuclear PR or by nongenomic pathways via membrane receptors.
The link between progesterone and the immune system is partly established by lymphocyte PR, which have been demonstrated in peripheral blood γδ T cells [28, 29] and in peripheral blood NK cells [30] of pregnant women, with the latter expressing both PR A and B isoforms. The percentage of circulating PR-expressing lymphocytes increases throughout gestation, and it is significantly lower in women with recurrent miscarriages than in healthy pregnant women of corresponding gestational ages [31, 32], suggesting a relationship between lymphocyte PR expression and the outcome of pregnancy. The regulation of lymphocyte PR is activation dependent. Exposure of human nonpregnancy lymphocytes to in vitro mitogenic or alloantigenic stimuli increases lymphocyte PR expression [33]. The high percentage of circulating PR-expressing lymphocytes found in liver-transplanted patients suggests that in vivo allogeneic stimulation has a similar effect [34]. The latter finding allows the conclusion that PR expression in lymphocytes might not be a consequence of pregnancy-associated hormonal changes but is rather due to chronic stimulation by fetal antigens, and it suggests that efficient recognition of fetal antigens is a requirement for the establishment of progesterone-dependent immune regulatory mechanisms.
Progesterone-Induced Blocking Factor Mediates the Immunological Effects of Progesterone
In the presence of progesterone, PR-positive pregnancy lymphocytes produce a protein called progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF), which mediates some of the immunological effects of progesterone [35].
PIBF1 cDNA encodes a protein of 757 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of 89 kDa, which shows no significant amino acid sequence homology with any known protein [36]. Though PIBF was originally described as a molecule secreted by pregnancy lymphocytes, it later became obvious that it is produced by many other cell types and that the full-length PIBF and the shorter secreted forms produced by alternative splicing have very different functions.
The full-length PIBF is associated with the nucleus [37-39] and plays a role in cell cycle regulation. This form has been implicated in regulation of the invasiveness of both the trophoblast and malignant tumors [40-42]. The shorter forms are located in the cytoplasm and, after being secreted, they act as cytokines.
Cytokine-Like Effects of PIBF
Effects of PIBF on Cytokine Production
Pregnancy is characterized by a Th2-biased cytokine balance [43, 44]. The Th1/Th2 ratio is lower in the peripheral blood of healthy pregnant women than in that of nonpregnant individuals or in women with pathological pregnancies [45]. Administration of Th1 cytokines to pregnant mice results in pregnancy loss [46]. In general, increased production of Th2 cytokines is a characteristic of uneventful pregnancies and favors a normal outcome [45].
PIBF alters the Th1/Th2 balance. Mitogen-activated murine spleen cells produce 8–10 times more IL-10, IL-4, and IL-5 in the presence of PIBF than in its absence [47]. Raghupathy et al. [48] reported that progesterone-treated human pregnancy lymphocytes produce PIBF, followed by a decreased production of Th1 cytokines and an increased production of Th2 cytokines. Furthermore, production of the type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10 by mitogen-stimulated lymphocytes from women with recurrent miscarriages or preterm delivery as well as IL-4 and IL-10 production by lymphocytes from healthy pregnant women are also significantly increased upon exposure to PIBF [49].
The PIBF receptor is a GPI-anchored protein, which forms a heterodimer with the α chain of the IL-4 receptor [50]. PIBF binding to its receptor induces nuclear translocation of phosphorylated STAT6 dimers. These data suggest the existence of a novel type of IL-4R composed of the IL-4R α chain and the GPI-anchored PIBF receptor. Furthermore, the fact that PIBF signals via the α chain of the IL-4 receptor explains the induction, by PIBF, of Th2-dominant cytokine production.
PIBF Regulates NK Activity during Pregnancy
In vivo data support the effect of PIBF on NK activity. The adoptive transfer of spleen cells with a high NK activity to pregnant mice increases fetal loss [51], and this is counteracted by treatment with PIBF [52]. On the other hand, the increased resorption rates observed in PIBF-depleted mice are corrected by treating the mice with anti-NK antibodies [53], suggesting that PIBF contributes to the success of murine gestation by controlling NK activity.
The secreted forms of PIBF modulate both peripheral and decidual NK activity. Decidual NK cells constitute 60–70% of all decidual lymphocytes in the first trimester of human pregnancy [54] and are both phenotypically and functionally different from peripheral NK cells. Most decidual NK cells are CD16−CD56bright, and they show a low cytolytic activity even though they contain cytotoxic granules [55] and selectively overexpress genes of perforin and granzymes A and B [54].
During normal gestation, decidual NK cells contribute to the creation of a favorable environment for implantation, placentation, and embryonic development [56], but at the same time they are fully armed to fight intrauterine infections if needed [57]. Under certain conditions, e.g., when exposed to hCMV-infected autologous decidual cells [58] or during spontaneous abortion in mice [59], they degranulate, but during normal pregnancy these cells are not cytotoxic despite the abundant presence of cytotoxic molecules in their cytoplasmic granules [60, 61].
The cytotoxic mechanisms exerted by NK cells can potentially damage the trophoblast. In humans, recurrent miscarriages are associated with an increased number of endometrial NK cells [62]. Gulan et al. [63] demonstrated a decreased perforin content of decidual lymphocytes from failed pregnancies as compared to those from normal pregnancy deciduae, suggesting that an increased rate of degranulation might have had taken place in the former case. Lachapelle et al. [64] showed that while the number of endometrial NK cells did not change in recurrent aborters the ratio of the CD16−CD56bright uNK cell subset and the CD16+CD56dim subset was reduced. In patients who miscarried chromosomally normal embryos the percentage of CD16−CD56bright uNK cells decreased compared to those who miscarried chromosomally abnormal embryos or those of normal pregnancy [65]. These data suggest that a part of human recurrent miscarriages with an unknown etiology might be explained by a deficiency in CD16−CD56bright uNK cells, although the precise mechanism is unknown. The reason for the decreased cytotoxic potential of decidual NK cells is only partly explained by the presence on the trophoblast of HLA-E molecules, which act as a ligand for the NKG2A inhibitory receptor. It is still not clear why these cells do not release perforin in the decidua.
Although decidual NK cells do not express nuclear PR, they appear to be affected by PIBF. PIBF blocks regulation of perforin expression in decidual lymphocytes cultured with decidual adherent cells; furthermore, anti-PIBF antibodies reverse progesterone-mediated reduction in cytolytic activity of decidual lymphocytes [66]. In the mouse decidua there is an abundance of PIBF+ and DBA+ decidual NK cells. These cells are absent from the deciduae of alymphoid mice, but they present in the decidua of those reconstituted with bone marrow from male BALB/c mice. Perforin is colocalized with PIBF in cytoplasmic granules in 54% of PIBF+ decidual NK cells on day 12.5 of pregnancy, whereas in anti-progesterone-treated mice all of the PIBF+ cells are perforin positive on the same gestational day [67]. Faust et al. [68] showed that PIBF inhibits the cytotoxicity of peripheral NK cells via a block of degranulation without interfering with target conjugation.
Putting all of these observations together, it cannot be ruled out that PIBF present in the cytoplasmic granules of decidual NK cells contributes to a low decidual NK activity by inhibiting the release of perforin and other cytotoxic molecules.
The Embryo Communicates with the Maternal Immune System via Extracellular Vesicles
Earlier evidence suggests that the embryo signals the maternal immune system. Daya and Clark [69] demonstrated immunosuppressive factors in an embryo culture medium, and Kelemen et al. [70] reported an increased expression of IL-10 mRNA in peripheral lymphocytes incubated with the culture media of fertilized eggs but not in those incubated with follicular fluid. Thus, there is evidence that the embryo releases signals that alter maternal immune functions from the earliest stages of pregnancy; however, the mechanism of signal transport has not been thoroughly investigated.
Extracellular vesicles (EV) are produced by all types of cells, and because they transport different kinds of molecules from one cell to the other they can be considered a means of intercellular communication and as such are candidates for conveying signals from the embryo to the mother.
We have previously demonstrated EV in culture media of in vitro cultured human embryos [71]; thus it seemed plausible that these structures might be involved in communication between the embryo and the endometrium during implantation.
EV originating from various cell types and carrying different molecules can both activate and suppress the function of the immune system by presenting antigens [72, 73], MHC molecules [74-77], cytokines [78-81], or microRNA [82]. Embryo-derived EV are also detectable at the embryo-maternal interface in mouse implantation sites [83]. Immuno-electron microscopy revealed that among others these embryo-derived EV carry PIBF. Mouse embryo-derived EV adhere to the surface of both CD4+ and CD8+ murine peripheral T lymphocytes, partly via phosphatidylserine binding. Embryo-derived EV induce IL-10 production by murine peripheral CD8+ lymphocytes, and this effect is abrogated by pretreatment of the EV with anti-PIBF antibody [83]. These data suggest that the embryo communicates with the maternal immune system via EV, and that PIBF+ embryo-derived EV alter the function of peripheral lymphocytes, thus contributing to the communication between the embryo and the mother in the early stage of pregnancy.
Cytokine-Like Effects of PIBF Contribute to the Maintenance of Pregnancy
PIBF is present in pregnancy serum as well as in the urine of pregnant women, and its concentration is predictive of the outcome of pregnancy.
A study on 500 pregnant women and 80 nonpregnant individuals revealed that during normal human pregnancy the concentration of PIBF in urine samples continuously increases until the 37th gestational week and starts to decrease thereafter, disappearing when labor starts. In women with threatened miscarriage or threatened preterm delivery, urinary PIBF levels remain significantly lower than those of healthy pregnant women of corresponding gestational ages [84]. In the urine of patients with preeclampsia, PIBF concentrations are significantly lower than in normal pregnancy, and they correlate with the number of symptoms presented. The onset of labor is also predictable on the basis of this test; however, the predictive value of PIBF measurement depends on the interval between sampling and the onset of labor. In samples that are taken within 2 days before the start of labor, PIBF concentrations were significantly lower than in those obtained 7–16 days before labor [84]. This was confirmed later by several studies. Hudić et al. [85] was able to predict preterm births based on lower-than-normal pregnancy PIBF values within 5 days before labor, while Beta et al. [86] showed that in women who have a spontaneous early preterm delivery the maternal serum levels of PIBF are not altered at 11–13 weeks of gestation. In line with this, Check et al. [87] reported that the failure to detect PIBF at 3–5 weeks of seemingly normal pregnancy is associated with a higher rate of miscarriage. The same group demonstrated a difference in the percentage of PIBF+ lymphocytes between pregnant and nonpregnant women [88] and an increased percentage of PIBF+ cells following lymphocyte immunotherapy [89]. Mifepristone treatment for nonsurgical termination of pregnancy resulted in a decreased proportion of PIBF-positive lymphocytes [90].
These data, in line with previous in vivo findings, suggest that PIBF production is a characteristic feature of normal pregnancy and that determination of PIBF concentrations in urine or in the serum of pregnant women might be of use for diagnosis of threatened premature pregnancy termination.
Taken together, these data indicate that recognition of fetal antigens initiates changes in the functioning of the maternal immune system. The progesterone-dependent mediator PIBF plays an important role in this process by inducing Th2-dominant cytokine production and by controlling NK activity, thus creating a favorable environment for the embryo and the developing fetus.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by GINOP-2.3.2-15-201600021, PTE ÁOK-KA 2017-22, and EFOP-3.6.1.-16-2016-00004.
References
- 1.Medawar PB. Some immunological and endocrinological problems raised by the evolution of viviparity in vertebrates. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1953;7:320–338. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Billington WD, Transfer of antigens and antibodies between mother and fetus . Immunological Obstetrics. In: Coulam CB, Faulk WP, McIntyre J, editors. New York: Norton; 1992. pp. pp 290–304. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Toder V, Strassburger D, Irlin I, et al. Nonspecific immunopotentiators and pregnancy loss: complete Freund adjuvant reverses high fetal resorption rate in CBA/JxDBA/2 mouse combination. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1990;24:63–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1990.tb01040.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chaouat G, Kolb JP, Kiger N, et al. Immunological concomitants of vaccination against abortion in mice. J Immunol. 1985;134:1594–1598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Komlos L, Zamir R, Joshua H, et al. Common HLA antigens in couples with repeated abortions. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1977;7:330–335. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(77)90066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ober C. HLA and reproduction: lessons from studies in Hutterites. Placenta. 1995;16:569–577. doi: 10.1016/0143-4004(95)90026-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ober C. HLA and pregnancy: the paradox of the fetal allograft. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:1–5. doi: 10.1086/301692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Drake BL, Head JR. Murine trophoblast can be killed by lymphokine-activated killer cells. J Immunol. 1989;143:9–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zuckermann FA, Head JR. Murine trophoblast resists cell-mediated lysis. 2. Resistance to natural cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Cell Immunol. 1988;116:274–286. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(88)90230-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Faulk WP, Temple A. Distribution of β2 microglobulin and HLA in chorionic villi of human placentae. Nature. 1976;262:799. doi: 10.1038/262799a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Faulk WP, Sanderson AR, Temple A. Distribution of MHC antigens in human placental chorionic villi. Transplant Proc. 1977;9:1379–1384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goodfellow PN, Barnstable CJ, Bodmer WF, et al. Expression of HLA system antigens on placenta. Transplantation. 1976;22:595–603. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197612000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sunderland CA, Redman CWG, Stirrat GM. HLA A, B, C antigens are expressed on nonvillous trophoblast of the early human placenta. J Immunol. 1981;127:2614–2615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Redman CWG, McMichael AJ, Stirrat GM, et al. Class 1 major histocompatibility complex antigens on human extra-villous trophoblast. Immunology. 1984;52:457–468. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guillaudeux T, Rodriguez AM, Girr M, et al. Methylation status and transcriptional expression of the MHC class I loci in human trophoblast cells from term placenta. J Immunol. 1995;154:3283–3299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Le Bouteiller., P HLA class I chromosomal region, genes and products: facts and questions. Crit Rev Immunol. 1994;14:89–129. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v14.i2.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lanier LL. NK cell receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998;16:359–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lazetic SC, Chang JP, Houchins LL, et al. Human natural killer cell receptors involved in MHC class I recognition are disulfide-linked heterodimers of CD94 and NKG2 subunits. J Immunol. 1996;157:4741–4745. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brooks AG, Posch PE, Scorzelli CJ, et al. NKG2A complexed with CD94 defines a novel inhibitory natural killer cell receptor. J Exp Med. 1997;185:795–800. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.4.795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Perez-Villar JJ, Carretero M, Navarro F, et al. Biochemical and serologic evidence for the existence of functionally distinct forms of the CD94 NK cell receptor. J Immunol. 1996;157:5367–5374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dickmeiss E, Soeberg B, Svegaard A. Human cell-mediated cytotoxicity against modified target cells is restricted by HLA. Nature. 1977;270:326–328. doi: 10.1038/270526a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McMichael AJ, Ting A, Zweerink HJ, et al. HLA restriction of cell-mediated lysis of influenza virus-infected cells. Nature. 1977;270:524–526. doi: 10.1038/270524a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Barnstable CJ, Bodmer WF. Immunology and the fetus. Lancet. 1978;(i):326. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Meeusen E, Fox A, Brandon M, et al. Activation of uterine intraepithelial gamma delta T cell receptor positive lymphocytes during pregnancy. Eur J Immunol. 1993;23:1112–1117. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830230520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mincheva Nilsson L, Baranov V, Yeung M, et al. Immunomorphologic studies of human decidua-associated lymphoid cells in normal early pregnancy. J Immunol. 1994;152:2020–2032. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu WJ, Gottshall SL, Hansen PJ. Increased expression of cell surface markers on endometrial g/d T cell receptor intraepithelial lymphocytes induced by the local presence of the sheep conceptus. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;37:199–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1997.tb00214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Weintraub BC, Jackson MR, Hedrick SM. Gamma delta T cells can recognize nonclassical MHC in the absence of conventional antigenic peptides. J Immunol. 1994;153:3051–3058. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Szekeres-Bartho J, Barakonyi A, Polgar B, et al. The role of g/d T cells in progesterone-mediated immunomodulation during pregnancy: a review. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1999;42:44–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1999.tb00464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Barakonyi A, Kovacs KT, Miko E, et al. Recognition of nonclassical HLA class I antigens by gamma delta T cells during pregnancy. J Immunol. 2002;168:2683–2688. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.6.2683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Arruvito L, Giulianelli S, Flores AC, et al. NK cells expressing a progesterone receptor are susceptible to progesterone-induced apoptosis. J Immunol. 2008;180:5746–5753. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.8.5746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Szekeres-Bartho J, Autran B, Debre P, et al. Immunoregulatory effects of a suppressor factor from healthy pregnant women's lymphocytes after progesterone induction. Cell Immunol. 1989;122:281–294. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(89)90077-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Szekeres-Bartho J, Szekeres GY, Debre P, et al. Reactivity of lymphocytes to a progesterone receptor-specific monoclonal antibody. Cell Immunol. 1990;125:273–283. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(90)90083-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Paldi A, d'Auriol L, Misrahi M, et al. Expression of the gene coding for the progesterone receptor in activated human lymphocytes. Endocr J. 1994;2:317–320. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Szekeres-Bartho J, Weill BJ, Mike G, et al. Progesterone receptors in lymphocytes of liver-transplanted and transfused patients. Immunol Lett. 1989;22:259–261. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(89)90162-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Szekeres-Bartho J, Kilar F, Falkay G, et al. Progesterone-treated lymphocytes of healthy pregnant women release a factor inhibiting cytotoxicity and prostaglandin synthesis. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol. 1985;9:15–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1985.tb00334.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Polgar B, Kispal Gy, Lachmann M, et al. Molecular cloning and immunological characterization of a novel cDNA coding for PIBF. J Immunol. 2003;171:5956–5963. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.11.5956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lachmann M, Gelbmann D, Kálmán E, et al. PIBF (progesterone induced blocking factor) is overexpressed in highly proliferating cells and associated with the centrosome. Int J Cancer. 2004;112:51–60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim K, Lee K, Rhee K. CEP90 is required for the assembly and centrosomal accumulation of centriolar satellites, which is essential for primary cilia formation. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim K, Rhee K. The pericentriolar satellite protein CEP90 is crucial for integrity of the mitotic spindle pole. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:338–347. doi: 10.1242/jcs.078329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Miko E, Halasz M, Jericevic-Mulac B, et al. Progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) and trophoblast invasiveness. J Reprod Immunol. 2011;90:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2011.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Halasz M, Polgar B, Berta G, et al. Progesterone-induced blocking factor differentially regulates trophoblast and tumor invasion by altering matrix metalloproteinase activity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:4617–4630. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1404-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Balassa T, Berta G, Jakab L, et al. The effect of the progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) on E-cadherin expression, cell motility and invasion of primary tumour cell lines. J Reprod Immunol. 2018;125:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2017.10.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wegmann TG, Lin H, Guilbert L. Bidirectional cytokine interactions in the maternal-fetal relationship: is successful pregnancy a TH2 phenomenon? Immunol Today. 1993;14:353–356. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90235-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Raghupathy R. Th1-type immunity is incompatible with successful pregnancy. Immunol Today. 1997;18:478–482. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(97)01127-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Salazar Garcia MD, Mobley Y, Henson J, et al. Early pregnancy immune biomarkers in peripheral blood may predict preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. 2018;125:25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2017.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chaouat G, Menu E, Clark DA, et al. Control of fetal survival in CBA x DBA/2 mice by lymphokine therapy. J Reprod Fertil. 1990;89:447–458. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0890447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Szekeres-Bartho J, Wegmann TG. A progesterne-dependent immunomodulatory protein alters the Th1/Th2 balance. J Reprod Immunol. 1996;31:81–95. doi: 10.1016/0165-0378(96)00964-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Raghupathy R, Al Mutawa E, Makhseed M, et al. Modulation of cytokine production by dydrogesterone in lymphocytes from women with recurrent abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:1096–1101. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Raghupathy R, Al Mutawa E, Al-Azemi M, et al. The progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) modulates cytokine production by lymphocytes from women with recurrent miscarriage and with preterm delivery. J Reprod Immunol. 2009;80:91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kozma N, Halasz M, Polgar B, et al. PIBF activates STAT6 via binding to a novel IL-4 receptor. J Immunol. 2006;176:819–826. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kinsky R, Delage G, Rosin N, et al. A murine model of NK cell mediated resorption. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1990;23:73–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1990.tb00675.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Szekeres-Bartho J, Kinsky R, Chaouat G. The effect of a progesterone induced immunologic blocking factor on NK-mediated resorption. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1990;24:105–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1990.tb01047.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Szekeres-Bartho J, Par G, Dombay Gy, et al. The anti-abortive effect of PIBF in mice is manifested by modulating NK activity. Cell Immunol. 1997;177:194–199. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1997.1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Koopman LA, Kopcow HD, Rybalov B, et al. Human decidual natural killer cells are a unique NK cell subset with immunomodulatory potential. J Exp Med. 2003;198:1201–1212. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.King A, Burrows T, Verma S, et al. Human uterine lymphocytes. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:480–485. doi: 10.1093/humupd/4.5.480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Redhead ML, Portilho NA, Felker AM, et al. The transcription factor NFIL3 is essential for normal placental and embryonic development but not for uterine natural killer (UNK) cell differentiation in mice. Biol Reprod. 2016;94:101. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.138495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Quillay H, El Costa H, Duriez M, et al. NK cells control HIV-1 infection of macrophages through soluble factors and cellular contacts in the human decidua. Retrovirology. 2016;13:39. doi: 10.1186/s12977-016-0271-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Siewiera J, El Costa H, Tabiasco J, et al. Human cytomegalovirus infection elicits new decidual natural killer cell effector function. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003257. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lima PDA, Paffaro VA, Jr, Yamada AT, Functional duality of mouse uterine natural killer cell in pregnancy . Immunology of Pregnancy 2013. In: Chaouat G, Sandra O, Lédée N, editors. Sharjah, Bentham Science. 2013. pp. pp 335–358. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rukavina D, Rubesa G, Gudelj L, et al. Characteristics of perforin expressing lymphocytes within the first trimester of human pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1995;33:394–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1995.tb00908.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Crncic TB, Laskarin G, Frankovic KJ, et al. Early pregnancy decidual lymphocytes beside perforin use Fas ligand (FasL) mediated cytotoxicity. J Reprod Immunol. 2007;73:108–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Quenby S, Farquharson R. Uterine natural killer cells, implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:24–28. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62012-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gulan G, Podack ER, Rukavina D, et al. Perforin-expressing lymphocytes in peripheral blood and decidua of human first-trimester pathological pregnancies. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;38:9–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1997.tb00270.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lachapelle MH, Miron P, Hemmings R, et al. Endometrial T, B, and NK cells in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion: altered profile and pregnancy outcome. J Immunol. 1996;156:4027–4034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yamada H, Morikawa M, Kato EH, et al. Pre-conceptional natural killer cell activity and percentage as predictors of biochemical pregnancy and spontaneous abortion with normal chromosome karyotype. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2003;50:351–354. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0897.2003.00095.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Laskarin G, Strbo N, Sotosek V, et al. Progesterone directly and indirectly affects perforin expression in cytolytic cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1999;42:312–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1999.tb00107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bogdan A, Berta G, Szekeres-Bartho J. PIBF positive uterine NK cells in the mouse decidua. J Reprod Immunol. 2017;119:38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Faust ZS, La Karin G, Rukavina D, et al. Progesterone induced blocking factor inhibits degranulation of NK cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1999;42:71–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Daya S, Clark DA. Immunosuppressive factor (or factors) produced by human embryos in vitro. N Engl J Med. 1986;24:1551–1552. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kelemen K, Paldi A, Tinneberg H, et al. Early recognition of pregnancy by the maternal immune system. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1998;39:351–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1998.tb00368.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Pallinger E, Bognar Z, Bodis J, et al. A simple and rapid flow cytometry-based assay to identify a competent embryo prior to embryo transfer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39927. doi: 10.1038/srep39927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Montecalvo A, Shufesky WJ, Stolz DB, et al. Exosomes as a short-range mechanism to spread alloantigen between dendritic cells during T cell allorecognition. J Immunol. 2008;180:3081–3090. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Raposo G, Nijman HW, Stoorvogel W, et al. B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J Exp Med. 1996;183:1161–1172. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.3.1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nolte-‘t Hoe EN, Buschow SI, Anderton SM, et al. Activated T cells recruit exosomes secreted by dendritic cells via LFA-1. Blood. 2009;113:1977–1981. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-174094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Admyre C, Bohle B, Johansson SM, et al. B cell-derived exosomes can present allergen peptides and activate allergen-specific T cells to proliferate and produce TH2-like cytokines. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120:1418–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wakim LM, Bevan MJ. Cross-dressed dendritic cells drive memory CD8+ T-cell activation after viral infection. Nature. 2011;471:629–632. doi: 10.1038/nature09863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pizzirani C, Ferrari D, Chiozzi P, et al. Stimulation of P2 receptors causes release of IL-1beta-loaded microvesicles from human dendritic cells. Blood. 2007;109:3856–3864. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-031377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Qu Y, Franchi L, Nunez G, et al. Nonclassical IL-1 beta secretion stimulated by P2X7 receptors is dependent on inflammasome activation and correlated with exosome release in murine macrophages. J Immunol. 2007;179:1913–1925. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Xiang X, Liu Y, Zhuang X, et al. TLR2-mediated expansion of MDSCs is dependent on the source of tumor exosomes. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:1606–1610. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Mignot G, et al. Membrane-associated Hsp72 from tumor-derived exosomes mediates STAT3-dependent immunosuppressive function of mouse and human myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:457–471. doi: 10.1172/JCI40483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Liu Y, Xiang X, Zhuang X, et al. Contribution of MyD88 to the tumor exosome-mediated induction of myeloid derived suppressor cells. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:2490–2499. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ospina-Priet S, Chaiwangyen W, Herrmann J, et al. MicroRNA-141 is upregulated in preeclamptic placentae and regulates trophoblast invasion and intercellular communication. Transl Res. 2016;172:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Pallinger E, Bognar Z, Bogdan A, et al. PIBF+ extracellular vesicles from mouse embryos affect IL-10 production by CD8+ cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8:4662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23112-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Polgár B, Nagy E, Mikó E, et al. Urinary progesterone-induced blocking factor concentration is related to pregnancy outcome. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:1699–1705. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.030437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hudić I, Stray-Pedersen B, Szekeres-Bartho J, et al. Maternal serum progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) in the prediction of preterm birth. J Reprod Immunol. 2015;109:36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2015.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Beta J, Szekeres-Bartho J, Skyfta E, et al. Maternal serum progesterone-induced blocking factor at 11–13 weeks' gestation in spontaneous early preterm delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29:197–200. doi: 10.1159/000322388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Check JH, Levin E, Bollendorf A, et al. Miscarriage in the first trimester according to the presence or absence of the progesterone-induced blocking factor at three to five weeks from conception in progesterone supplemented women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2005;32:13–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Check JH, Arwitz M, Gross J, et al. Evidence that the expression of progesterone-induced blocking factor by maternal T-lymphocytes is positively correlated with conception. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;38:6–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1997.tb00269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Check JH, Arwitz M, Gross J, et al. Lymphocyte immunotherapy (LI) increases serum levels of progesterone induced blocking factor (PIBF) Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;37:17–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1997.tb00188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Salomon LJ, Rozenberg P, Szekeres-Bartho J, et al. Changes in progesterone-induced-blocking-factor expression rates following mifepristone administration in termination of pregnancy at 5 to 8 weeks. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17:353–356. doi: 10.1080/14767050500140370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
