Skip to main content
Case Reports in Gastroenterology logoLink to Case Reports in Gastroenterology
. 2018 Aug 28;12(2):519. doi: 10.1159/000488609

Erratum

Bodil Ohlsson
PMCID: PMC6167718  PMID: 30283286

In the article by Ohlsson et al., entitled “Endoscopic versus Laparoscopic Full-Thickness Biopsy in the Pathological Evaluation of the Enteric Nervous System” [Case Rep Gastroenterol 2018; 12: 32–40, DOI: 10.1159/000486390], in the fifth line of the Abstract, the sentence “The length of the myenteric plexus was greater in the endoscopic (23 mm) compared to the laparoscopic (11 mm) biopsy, with fewer tissue artefacts in the laparoscopic approach.” should read as follows: “The length of the myenteric plexus was greater in the endoscopic (23 mm) compared to the laparoscopic (11 mm) biopsy, with fewer tissue artefacts in the endoscopic approach.”


Articles from Case Reports in Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES