Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Ther. 2018 Jul 17;17(10):2123–2135. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1195

Phyllanthusmin derivatives induce apoptosis and reduce tumor burden in high grade serous ovarian cancer by late-stage autophagy inhibition

Alexandria N Young 1, Denisse Herrera 1, Andrew C Huntsman 2, Melissa A Korkmaz 3, Daniel D Lantvit 1, Sarmistha Mazumder 4, Shamalatha Kolli 4, Christopher C Coss 4, Salane King 4, Hongyan Wang 4, Steven M Swanson 5, A Douglas Kinghorn 2, Xiaoli Zhang 6, Mitch A Phelps 4, Leslie N Aldrich 3, James R Fuchs 2, Joanna E Burdette 1
PMCID: PMC6168422  NIHMSID: NIHMS1500547  PMID: 30018048

Abstract

High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is a lethal gynecological malignancy with a need for new therapeutics. Many of the most widely used chemotherapeutic drugs are derived from natural products or their semi-synthetic derivatives. We have developed potent synthetic analogues of a class of compounds known as phyllanthusmins, inspired by natural products isolated from Phyllanthus poilanei Beille. The most potent analogue, PHY34, had the highest potency in HGSOC cell lines in vitro and displayed cytotoxic activity through activation of apoptosis. PHY34 exerts its cytotoxic effects by inhibiting autophagy at a late stage in the pathway, involving the disruption of lysosomal function. The autophagy activator, rapamycin, combined with PHY34 eliminated apoptosis, suggesting that autophagy inhibition may be required for apoptosis. PHY34 was readily bioavailable through intraperitoneal administration in vivo where it significantly inhibited the growth of cancer cell lines in hollow fibers, as well as reduced ovarian tumor burden in a xenograft model. We demonstrate that PHY34 acts as a late-stage autophagy inhibitor with nanomolar potency and significant antitumor efficacy as a single agent against HGSOC in vivo. This class of compounds holds promise as a potential, novel chemotherapeutic and demonstrates the effectiveness of targeting the autophagic pathway as a viable strategy for combating ovarian cancer.

Keywords: natural products, autophagy, apoptosis, ovarian cancer, cancer therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

The most lethal gynecologic malignancy is ovarian cancer (OC), of which high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common and deadly subtype (1,2). The overall 5-year survival rate (46%) of HGSOC has not noticeably changed in the last 30 years (1,3). Treatment for HGSOC generally involves cytoreductive surgery and a combination of platinum-based (e.g. cisplatin) and taxane (e.g. paclitaxel) chemotherapy. While first-line treatment is initially effective, relapse with chemoresistance occurs rapidly in up to 80% of cases (4). Though targeted therapies, such as PARP inhibitors and anti-angiogenesis agents, have recently been approved for recurrent disease, gains in overall survival have been lagging and new drug development for this disease is warranted (47).

Natural products, like paclitaxel, and their derivatives provide a rich source of new chemotherapeutic agents. Phyllanthusmins (PHYs), which were isolated from various Phyllanthus species, are an example of a promising class of antiproliferative natural product compounds (8,9). In 2014, bioassay-guided fractionation of Phyllanthus poilanei extracts afforded PHYD, a novel and particularly potent member of this class, which exhibited nanomolar activity against a human colon cancer cell line (HT-29). Preliminary in vivo assays indicated that PHYD was able to inhibit the growth of HT-29 embedded intraperitoneally in fibers in athymic nude mice without displaying gross toxicity. The arylnaphthalene lignan lactone substructure of phyllanthusmins makes them similar to the aryltetralin, etoposide, a known DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor. However, PHYD was not able to inhibit this enzyme, indicating a novel mechanism of action (9).

Compounds with similar structures to PHYs, especially those with a diphyllin core, have been described as V (vacuolar)-ATPase inhibitors that impact lysosomal acidification in various cell types (1012). Acidification of the lysosome plays a vital role in autophagy, the process by which cells recycle their intracellular components, organelles, and macromolecules (13). During times of cell stress, autophagy may act as a survival mechanism, while too much intracellular recycling can induce cell death (14). Cancer cells may become dependent on autophagy to make intracellular building blocks available for their own energetic and proliferative needs or to eliminate dysfunctional or damaged organelles over time (15,16). Inhibiting or amplifying autophagy to lethal levels in these cells may be a viable option for treating disease (14,15,17,18). Cancer, and OC in particular, appears to be reliant on the process of autophagy as evidenced by a recent analysis of haploinsufficiency networks, which found autophagy and compensatory proteostasis pathways to be the most disrupted pathways in ovarian cancer as compared to 20 other cancer types (19). A number of recent studies are beginning to uncover a role for autophagy in combating HGSOC chemoresistance (2027) and are investigating potential autophagy-targeting compounds preclinically for efficacy against OC (2832), including V-ATPase inhibitors (3335).

Building on previous results (9), we synthesized a number of analogues, selecting for potency against OC cell lines. In this study, we report on the in vitro and in vivo activity of the three most potent analogues, PHY25, 30, and 34. These compounds inhibit late-stage autophagy, followed by apoptotic cell death in HGSOC. Our data exemplifies how iterative medicinal chemistry optimization of a natural product can generate potent late-stage autophagy inhibitors that trigger apoptosis with nanomolar cytotoxicity in vitro and induce significant reduction of tumor burden in vivo.

MATERIALS & METHODS

PHY Synthesis, Characterization, and Purity

Phyllanthusmin analogues (PHYs) were synthesized with functionalized carbohydrates to the aglycone core and characterized with 1H- and 13C-NMR (Supplemental Figure 1). Prior to biological testing, purity was determined by HPLC (Supplemental Figure 2A for PHY25, 2B for PHY30, and 2C for PHY34). Briefly, diphyllin glycoside starting materials (β-D-glycosyl diphyllin, α-L-arabinosyl diphyllin, and β-D-galactosyl diphyllin) were prepared according to a recent publication (36). Following the selective tert-butyldimethylsilyl protection of β-D-glycosyl diphyllin, per-methylation was cleanly accomplished (37). Fluoride-mediated desilylation then afforded PHY25 (Supplemental Figure 1A). PHY30 and PHY34 (Supplemental Figures 1B and1C, respectively) were prepared from their respective glycosyl starting materials via an acid catalyzed acetal formation (38). The experimental data for PHY30 is in agreement with the same compound that was recently disclosed as in intermediate in the first total synthesis of phyllanthusmin D (39).

Other Compounds

Purchased compounds included two chemotherapeutics [paclitaxel (Sigma #T7402) and etoposide (Sigma #E1383)], the autophagy inducer [rapamycin (Sigma #R8781)], an early-stage autophagy inhibitor [PIKIII (Cayman Chem #17002)], and two late-stage autophagy inhibitors [bafilomycin A1 (Sigma #SML1661 and LC Labs #B-1080 in Figure 4) and chloroquine (Sigma #C6628)] (40). Structures of non-FDA-approved small molecules may be found here: PIKIII (41) and bafilomycin A1 (42). All compounds were suspended in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and final vehicle concentrations in all experiments did not exceed 0.1% except where noted.

Figure 4. PHYs are late-stage autophagy inhibitors.

Figure 4.

A., B., C. HeLa cells stably expressing eGFP-LC3B were treated with PHYs for 4 hr., and the number of LC3B puncta per cell was quantified as a measure of autophagy modulation. Dose-response curves (A.), EC50 s (B.), and representative photos of bolded concentration in A. (C.) are displayed. D., E., F. HeLa cells stably expressing mCherry-eGFP-LC3B were treated with PHYs for 24 hr., and the ratio of autophagosomes (eGFP+/mCherry+) to autolysosomes (eGFP-/mCherry+) was quantified as a measure of autophagic flux. Dose-response curves (D.), EC50 s (E.), and representative photos of bolded concentration in D. (F.) are displayed. Persistence of high autophagosome/autolysosome ratio (D.) or co-localization of signal (yellow in F.) is consistent with late-stage autophagy inhibition. Scale bar = 10 μm. Each experiment was performed in at least three biological replicates. CQ = chloroquine, BAF = bafilomycin A1.

Cell Culture

The ovarian cancer (OVCAR3 and OVCAR8), colon cancer (HT-29), melanoma (MDA-MB-435), and breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. OVCAR8-RFP cells expressing red fluorescent protein were a gift from Sharon Stack at the University of Notre Dame, immortalized human ovarian surface epithelial cells (IOSE80) were a gift from Nelly Auersperg at the University of Vancouver, and eGFP-LC3 HeLa and mCherry-eGFP-LC3 HeLa cell lines were a gift from Ramnik Xavier at Massachusetts General Hospital. OVCAR3 was grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S), and 10 μg/mL insulin. OVCAR8 and OVCAR8-RFP were grown in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% P/S. HT-29 and MDA-MB-435 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS and 1% P/S. MDA-MB-231 cells were grown in DMEM with 5% FBS, 1% l-glutamine, 1% P/S, and 0.02 μg/mL insulin. IOSE80 was maintained in v/v 50% Medium 199 and v/v 50% MCBD with 15% FBS, 1% P/S, 1% l-glutamine, and 11 ng/mL epithelial growth factor. HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM with 8.8% FBS, 1.8% l-glutamine, and 1% P/S. Cultured cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cells were passaged a maximum of 20 times. Cell lines were validated by short tandem repeat analysis and tested mycoplasma-free in 2017.

Cell Viability Assay

Cells were seeded in 96-well, clear, flat-bottomed plates at 2,500 to 5,000 cells per well, depending on the cell line, and allowed to attach overnight. Compounds suspended in DMSO were diluted to final concentrations and added to the cells. The final vehicle concentration was 0.25% to achieve a wide dose range. Cells were incubated for 24, 48, or 72 hours. Cellular protein content was measured using a sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay as a measure of cell survival (43). Treatment measurements were normalized to vehicle, and dose-response curves with corresponding IC50 values were generated using Graphpad Prism Software.

2D Foci Assay

OVCAR3 and OVCAR8 were plated at a concentration of 400 or 200 cells per 60 mm dish, respectively, allowed to attach overnight, and treated as indicated for 72 hours. Foci were allowed to grow in non-treated medium with media changes every three days. When 2D foci became visible (day 20 for OVCAR3 and 14 for OVCAR8), they were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with 0.05% crystal violet, and imaged with the FluorChem E system (ProteinSimple). Foci counts were quantified with ImageJ software (NIH) and normalized to the vehicle control. Significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons, compared to the vehicle control.

Immunoblot Analysis

After culture and treatment, cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS) with protease (Roche Applied Science) and phosphatase (Sigma) inhibitors, incubated at −80°C, and centrifuged. Protein concentration was obtained using the bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) (Pierce), and 15 μg protein per sample was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose or activated 0.45 μm PVDF membranes (Thermo Fisher). After 5% milk block, the following primary antibodies were applied to blots at a 1:1000 concentration: GAPDH as a loading control (Cell Signaling #2118), PARP (Cell Signaling #9542), or LC3B (Cell Signaling #2775). Membranes were incubated with 1:1000 anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Cell Signaling #7074) prior to visualization of signal with SuperSignal™ West Femto substrate (Thermo Fisher) and imaging on a FluorChem E system (ProteinSimple).

Annexin V/Propidium Iodine Staining

Cells were seeded into T25 flasks, allowed to attach overnight, treated as indicated for 3 days. Cells were subjected to an Annexin V-FITC/Propidium Iodide Apoptosis Assay (Nexcelom Biosciences) according to instructions provided by the manufacturer, except with 10 μL annexin V-FITC reagent per sample. Fluorescence was detected using a K2 Cellometer (Nexcelom Biosciences). Data were analyzed with the FCS Express program (De Novo Software). Each replicate contained at least 2,000 cells for quantification of fluorescent signal. Statistics were generated with one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons to vehicle control within each group (Figure 2B) or Tukey’s multiple comparisons (Figure 6C).

Figure 2. PHYs induce apoptosis in vitro.

Figure 2.

A. Whole cell lysates were obtained from cells treated with vehicle (DMSO), chemotherapeutic controls (ETOPO or TAX), or PHYs for 72 hr. Representative Western blot analysis displays an increase in apoptosis biomarker, cleaved PARP (cPARP). GAPDH serves as a loading control. B. Cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO), ETOPO, TAX, or PHYs for 72 hr. and stained with annexin V-FITC (AV) and propidium iodide (PI). The fluorescent signal of each cell (n = <2,000 cells per replicate) was quantified with a Nexcelom Cellometer. Percentages of non-apoptotic cells (AV-,PI-) and early (AV+,PI-) and late (AV+,PI+) apoptotic cells were quantified. Each experiment was performed in at least three biological replicates, and data represent mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons to vehicle control within each group (B.) was used to generate p values (* denotes p<0.05, † denotes p<0.01, ‡ denotes p<0.001, § denotes p<0.0001). ETOPO = etoposide, TAX = paclitaxel.

Figure 6. PHY34 treatment leads to autophagy inhibition followed by apoptosis induction in vitro.

Figure 6.

A. Cells were plated and treated PHY34 for 24, 48, or 72 hrs. Dose-response curves were generated for two ovarian cancer cell lines (OVCAR8 and OVCAR3). Curves were normalized to vehicle (DMSO) control. B. Whole cell lysates were obtained from cells treated with vehicle (DMSO), PHY34, autophagy inducer (RAP), early-stage autophagy inhibitor (PIKIII), or late-stage autophagy inhibitor (BAF) for 24, 48, or 72 hr. Representative Western blot analysis is displayed, probing for biomarkers of autophagy (LC3B-II) and apoptosis (cPARP). GAPDH serves as a loading control. C. Cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO), PHY34, and/or RAP for 48 hr. in OVCAR8 and 72 hr. in OVCAR3 and stained with annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide to confirm RAP rescues PHY-induced apoptosis. The fluorescent signal of each cell (n = <2,000 cells per replicate) was quantified with a Nexcelom Cellometer. Percentages of non-apoptotic cells and apoptotic cells were quantified. Each experiment was performed in at least three biological replicates and data represent mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons (C.) was used to compare treatments within each group. Means that do not share a letter are significantly different (p<0.05). RAP = rapamycin, BAF = bafilomycin A1.

LC3B Puncta and Autophagic Flux Assay

HeLa cells stably expressing eGFP-LC3 (LC3 puncta assay) or stably expressing mCherry-eGFP-tagged LC3 (autophagic flux assay) (44) were seeded in 384 well plates at 3,000 cells per well. After attachment overnight, test compounds and controls were moved into assay plates using a 96-well pin tool (V&P Scientific) and a liquid handler, Biomek NXP Lab Automation Workstation (Beckman Coulter). Assay plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 (LC3 puncta assay) or 24 (autophagic flux assay) hours. Cells were then fixed with w/v 4% formaldehyde (Thermo Scientific) in PBS for 12 minutes, washed with PBS, DNA-stained with 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes) in PBS for 12 minutes, and diluted with PBS. Plates were sealed using PlateMax Semi-Automatic Plate Sealer (Axygen). Plates were imaged at 10X by an automated fluorescence microscope, ImageXpress Micro XLS (Molecular Devices), using DAPI and FITC filters (both assays) and Texas Red filter for the autophagic flux assay. Four sites were imaged per well. The number of puncta per cell was quantified using the MetaXpress High-Content Image Analysis Software with Transfluor Application Module (Molecular Devices). The average number of autophagosomes (eGFP+/mCherry+; yellow puncta) and autolysosomes (eGFP-/mCherry+; red puncta) per cell was quantified using CellProfiler Software (Broad Institute). Treatment measurements were normalized to vehicle, and dose-response curves with corresponding EC50 values were generated using GraphPad Prism Software.

Lysotracker and Acridine Orange Staining

Cells were plated according to the manufacturer’s instructions on 8-well, culture-treated μ-slides (Ibidi USA Inc.) for live cell confocal imaging. Cells were treated as indicated and incubated in either 1 μg/mL acridine orange (Sigma) in PBS for 15 minutes or 50 nM Lysotracker Red DND-99 (Invitrogen) in PBS for 30 minutes before imaging on a Zeiss Laser Scanning 710 confocal microscope. Images were obtained with Zen software (Zeiss).

in vivo Assays

All animals were treated in accordance with the NIH Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the established Animal Care and Use Committees at the Ohio State University (OSU, protocol #2009A0196-R2) the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC, protocol #16–035). In vivo studies conducted at OSU (maximum tolerated dose, bioavailability) utilized ICR male mice 6 weeks in age and around 20 grams in weight (Harlan Laboratories), and studies at UIC (hollow fiber assay, intraperitoneal xenografts) utilized NCr nu/nu athymic female mice 6–8 weeks in age (Taconic). Mice used in all in vivo assays were housed in a temperature- and light-controlled environment under 12:12 hour light:dark cycles and provided food and water ad libitum.

Solubility Testing

PHY34 was prepared at a starting concentration of 120 mg/mL in DMSO, 50 mg/ml in PEG300 and 30% HPβCD, or 1 mg/mL in PBS and centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 10 minutes. The soluble fraction was serially diluted and 100 µL was analyzed by absorption spectrometry using a BioTek Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader. The dilution of the original formulation within the linear range of the calibration curve was used to assess the concentration of PHY compounds in the soluble fraction. Data were acquired by using Software Gen5 2.05 (BioTek).

Maximum Tolerated Dose Testing

Mice were administered PHY34 in the formulation of 50% PEG300:50% saline intravenously (IV) at dose levels of 3, 1, 0.6 and 0.3 mg/kg until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was obtained. MTD is defined as the highest dose that can be administered to a mouse without causing unacceptable toxicity. MTDs were obtained starting at 10x IV MTD dose by the intraperitoneal (IP) route or 50x IV MTD dose by the oral (PO) route and decreasing doses down to 3x or 1x IV MTD dose. Five mice were used at each dosing level for each route of administration.

Bioavailability Studies

A sterile dosing solution of PHY34 was prepared in 50% PEG300:50% saline. Mice were dosed at the MTD via IV (0.6 mg/kg) or IP (1.8 mg/kg) injections or 75 mg/kg for PO administration. The injection volumes were 100 µL for IV and 200 µL for IP and PO per mouse. Around thirty mice for each dosing route were used to perform plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) study. At each time point post-dosing, three mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation, and blood was immediately collected via cardiac puncture then transferred to heparinized tubes. PHY34 was quantified using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with a Dionex RSLC nano LC system and a TSQ Quantiva mass spectrometer. Briefly, 200 µL internal standard solution (200 ng/mL PHY1, analog of PHY34, in DMSO/isopropal alcohol/acetonitrile, 5/10/10 v/v/v) was added to 100 µL mouse plasma followed by centrifugation at 4ºC and 13,500 rpm for 5 minutes. After nitrogen drying, 100 µL water was added to reconstitute the analytes, which were loaded in an autosampler vial for LC-MS/MS analysis. Analytes were separated on an Extend C-18 column (50 × 2.1 mm, 3.5 um) using a gradient of water and isopropanol, each with 0.1% formic acid. Mass transitions monitored were 583.3 > 381.2 (PHY34) and 711.3 > 109.1 [M+H]+. The calibration curve was linear from 1–2000 nM in mouse plasma. Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed by non-compartmental methods using default settings and the NCA analysis object in Phoenix WinNonlin v6.3 (Certara).

Hollow Fiber Assay

OVCAR3, OVCAR8, and HT-29 cells were grown and embedded in biocompatible hollow fibers for IP xenograft mice on Day 0 as previously described (45,46). Paclitaxel (5 mg/kg in 20% DMSO:40% PEG300:40% H2O), PHY analogues (0.75 mg/kg in 10% DMSO:40% PEG300:50% H2O), or vehicle (2% DMSO:48% PEG300:50% H2O) were dosed intraperitoneally (IP) once per day for 4 days (Days 3–6). Treatment group sizes were as follows: 3 mice received paclitaxel, 7 received each PHY analogue, and 6 received vehicle. Mice were sacrificed on Day 7 and fibers retrieved. The viable cells were evaluated with a modified 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (Promega). Statistics were generated with one-way ANOVA with Holm’s multiple comparisons to vehicle control for each cell line.

Intraperitoneal Xenograft

5 × 106 OVCAR8-RFP cells were xenografted IP per mouse and tumor growth was monitored with the Xenogen IVIS® Spectrum In Vivo Imaging System (PerkinElmer) as previously described (47). When tumors became detectable via IVIS® imaging, mice were separated into treatment groups of 5–6 mice and dosed once daily 3 times per week with paclitaxel (5 mg/kg), PHY34 (0.75 mg/kg), or vehicle (10% DMSO:40% PEG300:50% H2O) for 3 weeks. Mice were weighed 3 times a week and imaged once weekly with an exposure of 2 seconds, an Fstop of 2, and an excitation and emission wavelength of 535 and 620 nm, respectively. Average abdominal radiant efficiency was quantified with the system’s Living Image 4.0 software and normalized to Day 0. After week 3, mice were sacrificed and tumors were collected for immunohistochemistry. Statistics were generated with two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons to vehicle control.

Tumor Immunohistochemistry

Tumors obtained from the IP xenograft experiment were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde before dehydration and paraffin sectioning. Sectioning and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed using standard histologic procedures. Sections were incubated in anti-Ki67 (Abcam #ab15580), followed by anti-rabbit IgG (Leica Biosystems #DS9800). Immunoreactivity was visualized with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen and counterstained with Mayer’s Hematoxylin. Tissues without primary antibody treatment were used as a negative control. Images were acquired on a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope using a DS-Ri1 digital camera and NIS Elements software (Nikon Instruments).

Statistical Analysis

Data presented are the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and represent at least 3 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism software and SAs9.4 for the hollow fiber assay. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA with Dunnett’s, Holm’s, or Tukey’s adjustment for multiple comparisons, as noted in methods/legends. Adjusted p<0.05 is considered significant. Symbols used to signify significance include: * denotes p<0.05, † denotes p<0.01, ‡ denotes p<0.001, § denotes p<0.0001.

RESULTS

Phyllanthusmin analogues (PHYs) induce cytotoxicity in HGSOC cell lines in vitro with nanomolar potency

Phyllanthusmins originally isolated from Phyllanthus poilanei Beille with demonstrated activity against cancer cell lines in vivo were used as inspiration to generate synthetic analogues with greater potency based on alterations to the sugar moiety (9). In order to determine if synthetic analogues were more potent than the natural products, a series of cell lines was tested with increasing concentrations (0.001 nM to 50 μM) of PHY25, 30, and 34 (Figure 1A). HGSOC cell lines, OVCAR8 and OVCAR3, were selected based on their designation as reliable models of HGSOC (48). Colon cancer cell line, HT-29, was also included for continuity as it was the cell line used to discover the original natural product PHY derivatives (9). IOSE80 served as the non-tumorigenic cell control (49). Paclitaxel and etoposide were included as positive controls. Dose-response curves (Figure 1B) with corresponding IC50 values (Figure 1C) were generated. PHY34 was the most cytotoxic compound in both HGSOC cell lines with an IC50 of 4 nM, more potent than that of paclitaxel (8–10 nM). PHY30 was cytotoxic in both HGSOC cell lines (IC50 = ~12 nM), while PHY25 was selectively potent against OVCAR8 (IC50 = 17 nM) over OVCAR3 (IC50 = 1.9 μM). PHY30 and 34 were not cytotoxic (IC50 > 50 μM) to the non-tumorigenic cell line control, IOSE80. PHY34 was subjected to the NIH NCI’s 60 Tumor Cell Line Screen (50,51), which showed PHY34’s capability to significantly inhibit the growth of 8 of the 9 types of cancer represented, including ovarian, colon, melanoma, and leukemia, after 48 hour treatment (Supplemental Figure 3A-B). PHY34 showed greater ability to inhibit the growth of OVCAR8 as compared to OVCAR3 in this screen. We additionally tested PHY25, 30, and 34 against two cell lines from the NCI screen, melanoma (MDA-MB-435) and triple negative breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), for 72 hours (Supplemental Figure 3C). PHYs, especially PHY34, had nanomolar IC50s in both these cell lines and were more cytotoxic against MDA-MB-231 (PHY34 IC50 in MDA-MB-435 = 23 nM, PHY34 IC50 in MDA-MB-231 = 5.2 nM).

Figure 1. PHYs induce cytotoxicity in HGSOC cell lines in vitro with nanomolar potency.

Figure 1.

A. Chemical structures and molecular weights (M.W.) of PHY25, PHY30, and PHY34. B. Cells were plated and treated with vehicle (DMSO), chemotherapeutic controls (TAX or ETOPO), or PHYs for 72 hrs. Dose-response curves were generated for two ovarian cancer cell lines (OVCAR8 and OVCAR3), colon cancer cell line (HT-29), and a non-tumorigenic control cell line (IOSE80). Curves were normalized to vehicle (DMSO) control. C. IC50 values generated from dose-response curves (B.). D. Cells were plated sparsely and treated with vehicle (DMSO), ETOPO, or PHYs for 72 hr. Treatment was removed, and single cells were allowed to develop into 2D foci for 2 (OVCAR8) or 3 (OVCAR3) weeks without the presence of drug in order to determine if initial treatment was cytostatic or cytotoxic. 2D foci were stained and quantified. Each experiment was performed in at least three biological replicates, and data represent mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons to vehicle control (D.) was used to generate p values (* denotes p<0.05, † denotes p<0.01, ‡ denotes p<0.001, § denotes p<0.0001). TAX = paclitaxel, ETOPO = etoposide, IC50 = concentration at which 50% of cells survive.

To further characterize if the PHY compounds were effective due to cytostatic versus cytotoxic action, 2D foci assays were performed (Figure 1D) where cells were exposed to drug for 72 hours and then foci were allowed to grow in drug-free medium. PHYs displayed greater potency in OVCAR8 than in OVCAR3 with all analogues being cytotoxic at 10 nM. In OVCAR3, PHY25 and 30 were cytotoxic at 1 μM, and PHY34 was cytotoxic at 100 nM. The low concentration (100 nM) of PHY25 and 30 was cytostatic in OVCAR3, showing decreased 2D foci formation compared to vehicle (DMSO) control.

PHYs induce apoptosis in vitro

In order to determine the mechanism of cell death in HGSOC cell lines, western blot analyses were performed for cleaved poly ADP-ribose polymerase (cPARP) as a biomarker for apoptosis. cPARP levels were increased in all PHY analogue treatments in OVCAR8 and most prominently with PHY34 in OVCAR3 (Figure 2A). Apoptosis induction was confirmed with annexin V-FITC (AV) and propidium iodide (PI) co-staining (Figure 2B). PHY analogue treatment at 10 nM resulted in a significant increase in the number of cells in early and late apoptosis (AV+,PI- and AV+,PI+, respectively) in OVCAR8 as compared to the vehicle control, with a corresponding decrease in non-apoptotic cells (AV-,PI-). Only PHY34 treatment (100 nM) resulted in significant increases in early and late apoptotic cells in OVCAR3. Since PHY34 was the most potent compound in both HGSOC cell lines and induced apoptosis to the highest extent, it was selected for use in remaining studies.

PHY34 reduces tumor burden in vivo

Prior to conducting in vivo experiments, the solubility and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PHY34 was assessed. PHY34 was resuspended in various solvents at increasing concentrations to elucidate the maximum soluble concentration displayed in mg/mL and mM in Supplemental Figure 4A. PEG300 was selected for in vivo experiments. Observed MTDs of PHY34 by various routes of administration are as follows: 0.6 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) administration, 1.8 mg/kg by intraperitoneal (IP) administration, and >30 mg/kg by oral (PO) administration. No toxicities were seen by PO administration. An IP dose of 0.75 mg/kg, less than half the MTD, was selected for in vivo studies.

To elucidate the bioavailability of PHY34 administered by various routes, plasma from mice dosed with 0.6 mg/kg IV, 1.8 mg/kg IP, or 75 mg/kg PO was subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis to determine the PHY34 plasma concentration over time (Figure 3A). The plasma concentration-time data was analyzed by non-compartmental methods to determine pharmacokinetic parameters listed in Supplemental Figure 4B. The observed IP bioavailability (F) for PHY34 was 56.6% and for PO was 2.5%. Systemic clearance (Cl) following PO dose was 194.1 L/hr/kg, roughly 40 times the mouse liver blood flow, suggesting significant extrahepatic clearance. The Tmax of PHY34 (0.25 hr) suggests very fast absorption of this compound orally.

Figure 3. PHY34 reduces tumor burden in vivo.

Figure 3.

A. PHY34 was administered to mice via various routes of administration and plasma PHY34 concentration was measured over time to generate a plasma concentration-time profile. B. Ovarian cancer (OVCAR8 and OVCAR3) and colon cancer (HT-29) cells were embedded in biocompatible hollow fibers and implanted IP in mice. Mice were treated with vehicle, chemotherapeutic control (TAX), or PHYs once per day for 4 days. Fibers were retrieved, and the survival of cells within was quantified. Results were normalized to vehicle control. C. OVCAR8-RFP cells were xenografted IP and allowed to form tumors. Mice were dosed with vehicle, TAX, or PHY34 3 times per week for 3 weeks. Quantification of tumor burden over time (average radiant efficiency as measured with IVIS® imaging) was normalized to Day 0, and representative images of OVCAR8-RFP tumors in mice are displayed. D. Immunohistochemistry of Ki67 staining as a marker of proliferation is shown from IP xenograft tumors (C.). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data represent mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Holm’s multiple comparisons to vehicle control for each cell line (B.) or two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons to vehicle control (C.) were used to generate p values (* denotes p<0.05, † denotes p<0.01, ‡ denotes p<0.001, § denotes p<0.0001). IV = intravenous, IP = intraperitoneal, PO = oral, TAX = paclitaxel, H&E = hematoxylin & eosin.

To evaluate the ability of PHYs to induce toxicity in an animal model, a hollow fiber assay was performed (Figure 3B). Cancer cell lines (OVCAR3, OVCAR8, and HT-29) embedded in biocompatible hollow fibers were implanted IP into female nude mice. All analogues significantly decreased HT-29 tumor cell survival in the hollow fiber. PHY34 significantly reduced cell viability of OVCAR8, but not OVCAR3, and was selected for further in vivo study.

OVCAR8 cells fluorescently labeled with RFP (OVCAR8-RFP) were xenografted IP into female nude mice. Tumor formation was monitored by IVIS® imaging, and, once tumors were established, they were dosed three times a week for three weeks. PHY34 (0.75 mg/kg) and the positive control, paclitaxel (5 mg/kg), significantly decreased tumor burden based on average abdominal radiant efficiency as compared to vehicle at week 3 with paclitaxel also achieving significant tumor burden reduction at week 2 (Figure 3C). No gross toxicities were observed, and mice maintained similar body weights to vehicle animals throughout the study in contrast to the paclitaxel control group, which saw a significant reduction in body weight (Supplemental Figure 4C). The proliferative marker, Ki67, was reduced in tumors treated with PHY34, as illustrated by immunohistochemical analysis (Figure 3D) of tumors from 3 mice per group.

PHYs are late-stage autophagy inhibitors

Compounds with similar diphyllin core structures to PHYs have been shown to modulate autophagy (1012). PHY25, 30, and 34 were subjected to two screening assays for autophagy modulators (44). HeLa cells expressing eGFP-LC3B were treated with PHYs for 4 hours, fixed, and fluorescent LC3B puncta were counted over a range of doses (9.31 fM to 20 μM) (Figure 4A-C). PHYs, especially PHY34, sustained high levels of LC3B puncta at low doses (EC50 = 2 nM). In comparison, an early natural product analogue, PHYC (9), had a much higher EC50 (979 nM).

Since an increase in LC3B puncta can be caused by autophagy inducers or late-stage autophagy inhibitors, an autophagic flux assay was performed (Figure 4D-F), wherein an LC3B protein tagged with both mCherry and eGFP was visualized to count autophagosomes (eGFP+/mCherry+) and autolysosomes (eGFP-/mCherry+). Flux was inferred by the acidic stability of the tags: the eGFP signal was attenuated in the acidic lysosomal environment, while the mCherry signal remained stable (52). An accumulation of autophagosomes, or higher ratio of autophagosomes/autolysosomes, is indicative of a late-stage inhibitor. Bafilomycin A1 (BAF) and chloroquine (CQ), both late-stage inhibitors, had significantly higher autophagosome/autolysosome ratios. All PHY compounds performed similarly to BAF and CQ as late-stage inhibitors of autophagy, and PHY34 had the greatest ability to inhibit autophagy of all compounds tested (EC50 = 3.9 nM). The original natural product, PHYC, required a much higher dose to achieve the same effect (EC50 = 1.1 μM). An increased ability to modulate autophagy correlated with the increased cytotoxicity seen in these synthetic analogues over their natural product predecessor.

PHY34 reduces the number and acidity of lysosomes in vitro

Since similar compounds have been hypothesized to modulate autophagy (1012), we next visualized lysosomes and their acidity. OVCAR8 and OVCAR3 cells were treated with PHY34 for 24 hours at 100 nM or 1 μM, respectively, and stained with either Lysotracker Red or acridine orange to monitor changes in the lysosomes due to autophagy inhibition using live confocal microscopy. A reduction in the fluorescence from the lysosomes was detected after treatment with PHY34 in both ovarian cancer cell lines (Figure 5A). BAF, a late-stage autophagy inhibitor (40), almost completely eliminated lysosome detection at 50 nM. PIKIII (an early-stage autophagy inhibitor) (40), which should block autophagy before the changes to lysosomal expression, was visually similar to DMSO. Acridine orange, a green dye that emits red/orange light when sequestered in acidic cellular compartments like the lysosome, similarly displayed a dramatic reduction in fluorescence after treatment with PHY34 or BAF (Figure 5B), suggesting a reduction in lysosomal acidification.

Figure 5. PHY34 reduces the number and acidity of lysosomes in vitro.

Figure 5.

Ovarian cancer cells (OVCAR8 and OVCAR3) were treated with vehicle (DMSO), negative control (PIKIII), positive control (BAF), or PHY34 for 24 hr. and stained with A. Lysotracker Red DND-99 to stain lysosomes or B. acridine orange to assess lysosomal acidity. Representative confocal images are displayed. Scale bar = 20 μm. Each experiment was performed in at least three biological replicates. BAF = bafilomycin A1.

PHY34 treatment leads to autophagy inhibition followed by apoptosis induction in vitro

In order to determine if autophagy preceded apoptosis, a series of time courses was evaluated. PHY34 induced cytotoxicity earlier and with greater potency in OVCAR8 than OVCAR3 (Figure 6A and Supplemental Figure 5 for PHY25 and 30). Western blot analyses (Figure 6B) supported an earlier induction of apoptosis in OVCAR8 based on enhanced cPARP levels after 48 hours, whereas it was not apparent until 72 hours in OVCAR3. Next, PHY34 was combined with a late-stage autophagy inhibitor, BAF, and demonstrated an additive effect on apoptosis induction. To determine if autophagy inhibition was necessary to induce apoptosis, the combination of a late-stage autophagy inhibitor (PHY34 or BAF) was tested with an autophagy inducer, rapamycin (RAP) (40). The presence of RAP reversed the conversion of PARP to cPARP. A rescue of apoptosis was also observed with annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide co-staining (Figure 6C) where the addition of RAP to PHY34 treatment significantly decreased the number of apoptotic cells as compared to PHY34 alone in both OVCAR8 at 48 hours treatment and OVCAR3 at 72 hours treatment. In contrast, PIKIII, an early-stage autophagy inhibitor did not contribute to apoptosis-mediated cell death. To confirm that autophagy was directly impacted by PHYs and the various controls, the conversion of LC3B-I to LC3B-II was monitored. Correspondingly, an increase in LC3B-II level can be seen in all PHY34- and BAF-treated cell lysates. The increase in LC3B-II can be seen as early as 24 hours in OVCAR8 and 48 hours in OVCAR3, suggesting that the late-stage inhibition of autophagy precedes the induction of apoptosis.

DISCUSSION

This work demonstrates that the synthetic derivatives, PHY25, 30, and 34, act as effective late-stage autophagy inhibitors able to interfere with tumor growth in vivo. Inhibition of late-stage autophagy by PHY34 may be required for the resulting apoptotic cell death. Importantly, late-stage autophagy inhibition by PHY34 preceded apoptosis induction, and this chain of events occurred at least 24 hours earlier in the more PHY-sensitive cell line, OVCAR8. Combination treatment with an autophagy inducer, rapamycin, rescued the PHY-treated cells from apoptosis. This implies that the apoptotic cell death seen after PHY34 treatment may rely on its ability to block autophagy. Bafilomycin A1 and rapamycin co-treatment displayed a similar rescue, further supporting PHY34’s role as a late-stage autophagy inhibitor. PHY34 was shown to modulate autophagy by its ability to increase both LC3B puncta and the autophagy marker, LC3B-II. An autophagic flux assay revealed its action as a late-stage inhibitor of the pathway, blocking the final breakdown of the autolysosomes. Overall, these phyllanthusmin compounds, PHY25, 30, and 34, demonstrated nanomolar cytotoxicity in HGSOC cell lines and were able to reduce tumor burden in vivo.

For this study, derivatization of the phyllanthusmin class of natural products focused on the modification and optimization of the glycone portion of the molecules and involved the introduction of variously functionalized carbohydrate scaffolds to diphyllin. These efforts provided PHY25 and 30, each of which possesses a different chemical moiety thought to be an important pharmacophore. A hybrid of the two compounds, incorporating the key pharmacophore from each, was designed and synthesized, providing PHY34. This technique resulted in the aforementioned improvement of PHY34’s in vitro and in vivo potencies as compared to the parent compounds (PHY25 and 30).

PHYs exhibit qualities that suggest they are good chemotherapeutic drug leads. Of the three compounds, PHY34 was effective in vivo against both ovarian and colon cancer models without gross toxicity and in vitro was not toxic to the normal cell control. The dose of PHY34 required to eliminate tumors in vivo was lower than that of paclitaxel (0.75 as compared to 5 mg/kg) and the animals displayed almost no change in body weight with PHY34 treatment. In the NCI 60 Tumor Cell Line Screen, PHYs demonstrated promising growth inhibition in 8 of the 9 tumor types investigated at 48 hours treatment and had nanomolar cytotoxicity against two cell lines from this screen, a melanoma and a triple negative breast cancer cell line, after 72 hours treatment. Of the HGSOC cell lines, OVCAR3 was less sensitive to PHY34 treatment than OVCAR8, and mechanistic effects of PHY treatment, such as autophagy inhibition and apoptosis induction occurred 24 hours later in OVCAR3. However, both OVCAR3 and OVCAR8’s IC50s were in the nanomolar range, and the delay in cytotoxicity may be explained by the slower growth of OVCAR3 in cell culture. Originally, the structure of PHYD was compared to etoposide, and both previous in vitro assays studying topoisomerase inhibition and DNA coil relaxation confirmed that these PHYs have a different mechanism (9). Our data further demonstrates that PHYs act differentially based on their far more potent IC50 values in vitro and their strong ability to eliminate colonies after cessation of treatment. These compounds were bioavailable through multiple routes of administration, including oral. Notably, despite the relatively low oral bioavailability of 2.5%, oral doses achieved plasma concentration greater than in vitro IC50 values, which suggests oral dosing is feasible.

The development of autophagy inhibitors for the treatment of HGSOC is currently an active area of interest and research. Indeed, an increasing number of compounds are being developed to target autophagy (2835). Late stage autophagy inhibitors, like bafilomycin A1 and PHYs, are able to induce apoptotic cell death, while the early stage inhibitor used in this study, PIKIII, requires additional cellular stress or nutrient deprivation (40). Large-scale studies have demonstrated the particular importance of the autophagic pathway in ovarian cancer (19). One analysis revealed greater V-ATPase immunoreactivity in epithelial ovarian cancer patient samples (n=59) and decreased overall survival in patients expressing higher levels of V-ATPase mRNA by analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas data (33), suggesting that V-ATPase expression could serve as a viable biomarker to stratify patient response to its inhibition. Biomarkers for autophagy, such as Beclin1 and LC3A, have also been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian (53) and clear cell ovarian cancers (54), respectively. Future studies should continue to assess the prognostic value of autophagy markers in HGSOC and work to detail the mechanisms that govern the potency of these preclinical compounds.

Furthermore, combination treatment with autophagy modulators may combat disease recurrence and chemoresistance (2027), an issue plaguing ~80% of HGSOC patients (4). Of over 20 current clinical trials involving autophagy modulators, almost all involve chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, and none are being conducted in ovarian cancer patients. Specific inhibition of V-ATPase subunits by shRNA and inhibitory monoclonal antibodies increases cisplatin sensitivity and reverses platinum resistance in OC in vitro (55). Specific attention should be paid to elucidate the best therapeutic strategy of autophagy modulation and combination therapies, including which patients would best respond to its induction or inhibition, and the specific means by which perturbation of the autophagic pathway elicits cytotoxicity via apoptosis. Taken together, this study supports further investigation of autophagy inhibitors for the treatment of HGSOC due to the variety of potentially clinically useful biomarkers inherent in their mechanism of action and the promise of extending patient survival by delaying chemoresistance with strategic combination therapy.

Supplementary Material

1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of grants P01CA125066 and 1F30CA217079 from the National Cancer Institute of the NIH (Bethesda, MD, USA). We are grateful to the University of Illinois at Chicago Research Resource Center’s Center for Cardiovascular Research and Physiology Core for training and use of the Xenogen IVIS® Spectrum Imager, the Histology Core for their immunohistochemical processing of tissues obtained from in vivo experiments, and the Core Imaging Facility for training and use of the Zeiss LSM 710 Confocal Microscope.

Financial Support: This research was funded by the grant, P01CA125066, from the National Cancer Institute of the NIH (Bethesda, MD, USA). A. Young is additionally funded by 1F30CA217079, also from the National Cancer Institute.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67(1):7–30 10.3322/caac.21387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kurman RJ. Origin and molecular pathogenesis of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2013;24 Suppl 10: x16–21 10.1093/annonc/mdt463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vaughan S, Coward JI, Bast RC Jr.,Berchuck A, Berek JS Brenton JD , et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11(10):719–25 10.1038/nrc3144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Korkmaz T, Seber S, Basaran G. Review of the current role of targeted therapies as maintenance therapies in first and second line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer; In the light of completed trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016;98:180–8 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Herzog TJ, Monk BJ. Bringing new medicines to women with epithelial ovarian cancer: what is the unmet medical need? Gynecol Oncol Res Pract 2017;4:13 10.1186/s40661-017-0050-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rossi L, Verrico M, Zaccarelli E, Papa A, Colonna M, Strudel M, et al. Bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A critical review of phase III studies. Oncotarget 2017;8(7):12389–405 10.18632/oncotarget.13310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bitler BG, Watson ZL, Wheeler LJ, Behbakht K. PARP inhibitors: Clinical utility and possibilities of overcoming resistance. Gynecol Oncol 2017;147(3):695–704 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu SJ, Wu TS. Cytotoxic arylnaphthalene lignans from Phyllanthus oligospermus. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 2006;54(8):1223–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ren Y, Lantvit DD, Deng Y, Kanagasabai R, Gallucci JC, Ninh TN, et al. Potent cytotoxic arylnaphthalene lignan lactones from Phyllanthus poilanei. J Nat Prod 2014;77(6):1494–504 10.1021/np5002785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sorensen MG, Henriksen K, Neutzsky-Wulff AV, Dziegiel MH, Karsdal MA. Diphyllin, a novel and naturally potent V-ATPase inhibitor, abrogates acidification of the osteoclastic resorption lacunae and bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res 2007;22(10):1640–8 10.1359/jbmr.070613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhao Y, Zhang R, Lu Y, Ma J, Zhu L. Synthesis and bioevaluation of heterocyclic derivatives of Cleistanthin-A. Bioorg Med Chem 2015;23(15):4884–90 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lu Y, Zhang R, Liu S, Zhao Y, Gao J, Zhu L. ZT-25, a new vacuolar H(+)-ATPase inhibitor, induces apoptosis and protective autophagy through ROS generation in HepG2 cells. Eur J Pharmacol 2016;771:130–8 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stransky L, Cotter K, Forgac M. The Function of V-ATPases in Cancer. Physiol Rev 2016;96(3):1071–91 10.1152/physrev.00035.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Janku F, McConkey DJ, Hong DS, Kurzrock R. Autophagy as a target for anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011;8(9):528–39 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.White E The role for autophagy in cancer. J Clin Invest 2015;125(1):42–6 doi 10.1172/JCI73941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Levine B, Klionsky DJ. Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev Cell 2004;6(4):463–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Duffy A, Le J, Sausville E, Emadi A. Autophagy modulation: a target for cancer treatment development. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2015;75(3):439–47 10.1007/s00280-014-2637-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gewirtz DA. The four faces of autophagy: implications for cancer therapy. Cancer Res 2014;74(3):647–51 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Delaney JR, Patel CB, Willis KM, Haghighiabyaneh M, Axelrod J, Tancioni I, et al. Haploinsufficiency networks identify targetable patterns of allelic deficiency in low mutation ovarian cancer. Nat Commun 2017;8:14423 10.1038/ncomms14423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang N, Dai L, Qi Y, Di W, Xia P. Combination of FTY720 with cisplatin exhibits antagonistic effects in ovarian cancer cells: role of autophagy. Int J Oncol 2013;42(6):2053–9 10.3892/ijo.2013.1906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang J, Wu GS. Role of autophagy in cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2014;289(24):17163–73 10.1074/jbc.M114.558288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Feng X, Li L, Jiang H, Jiang K, Jin Y, Zheng J. Dihydroartemisinin potentiates the anticancer effect of cisplatin via mTOR inhibition in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells: involvement of apoptosis and autophagy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014;444(3):376–81 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.01.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bao LJ, Jaramillo MC, Zhang ZB, Zheng YX, Yao M, Zhang DD, et al. Nrf2 induces cisplatin resistance through activation of autophagy in ovarian carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;7(4):1502–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bao L, Jaramillo MC, Zhang Z, Zheng Y, Yao M, Zhang DD, et al. Induction of autophagy contributes to cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer cells. Mol Med Rep 2015;11(1):91–8 10.3892/mmr.2014.2671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sun Y, Liu JH, Jin L, Sui YX, Lai L, Yang Y. Inhibition of Beclin 1 expression enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis through a mitochondrial-dependent pathway in human ovarian cancer SKOV3/DDP cells. Oncol Res 2014;21(5):261–9 10.3727/096504014X13946388748992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun Y, Liu JH, Jin L, Sui YX, Han LL, Huang Y. Effect of autophagy-related beclin1 on sensitivity of cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16(7):2785–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Khurana A, Roy D, Kalogera E, Mondal S, Wen X, He X, et al. Quinacrine promotes autophagic cell death and chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer and attenuates tumor growth. Oncotarget 2015;6(34):36354–69 10.18632/oncotarget.5632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Correa RJ, Valdes YR, Peart TM, Fazio EN, Bertrand M, McGee J, et al. Combination of AKT inhibition with autophagy blockade effectively reduces ascites-derived ovarian cancer cell viability. Carcinogenesis 2014;35(9):1951–61 10.1093/carcin/bgu049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ding YH, Zhou ZW, Ha CF, Zhang XY, Pan ST, He ZX, et al. Alisertib, an Aurora kinase A inhibitor, induces apoptosis and autophagy but inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Drug Des Devel Ther 2015;9:425–64 10.2147/DDDT.S74062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang C, Qiu X. Andrographolide radiosensitizes human ovarian cancer SKOV3 xenografts due to an enhanced apoptosis and autophagy. Tumour Biol 2015;36(11):8359–65 10.1007/s13277-015-3578-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhao X, Fang Y, Yang Y, Qin Y, Wu P, Wang T, et al. Elaiophylin, a novel autophagy inhibitor, exerts antitumor activity as a single agent in ovarian cancer cells. Autophagy 2015;11(10):1849–63 10.1080/15548627.2015.1017185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zi D, Zhou ZW, Yang YJ, Huang L, Zhou ZL, He SM, et al. Danusertib Induces Apoptosis, Cell Cycle Arrest, and Autophagy but Inhibits Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Involving PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway in Human Ovarian Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16(11):27228–51 10.3390/ijms161126018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lee YY, Jeon HK, Hong JE, Cho YJ, Ryu JY, Choi JJ, et al. Proton pump inhibitors enhance the effects of cytotoxic agents in chemoresistant epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Oncotarget 2015;6(33):35040–50 10.18632/oncotarget.5319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Patil R, Kulshrestha A, Tikoo A, Fleetwood S, Katara G, Kolli B, et al. Identification of Novel Bisbenzimidazole Derivatives as Anticancer Vacuolar (H(+))-ATPase Inhibitors. Molecules 2017;22(9) 10.3390/molecules22091559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lu X, Chen L, Chen Y, Shao Q, Qin W. Bafilomycin A1 inhibits the growth and metastatic potential of the BEL-7402 liver cancer and HO-8910 ovarian cancer cell lines and induces alterations in their microRNA expression. Exp Ther Med 2015;10(5):1829–34 10.3892/etm.2015.2758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Woodard JL, Huntsman AC, Patel PA, Chai H- B, Kanagasabai R, Karmahapatra S, et al. Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of derivatives of the phyllanthusmin class of arylnaphthalene lignan lactones. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry doi 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.03.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ciucanu I, Kerek F. A simple and rapid method for the permethylation of carbohydrates. Carbohydrate Research 1984;131(2):209–17 10.1016/0008-6215(84)85242-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rashid A, Mackie W, Colquhoun IJ, Lamba D. Novel Synthesis of monosulphated methyl α-D-galactopyranosides. Canadian Journal of Chemistry 1990;68(7):1122–7 10.1139/v90-173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu L, Hu Y, Liu H, Liu DY, Xia JH, Sun JS. First Total Synthesis of the Bioactive Arylnaphthyl Lignan 4OGlycosides Phyllanthusmin D and 4′′‐O‐Acetylmananthoside B. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2017;2017(25):3674–80 10.1002/ejoc.201700556. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg H, Xia HG, Yuan J. Pharmacologic agents targeting autophagy. J Clin Invest 2015;125(1):5–13 10.1172/JCI73937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dowdle WE, Nyfeler B, Nagel J, Elling RA, Liu S, Triantafellow E, et al. Selective VPS34 inhibitor blocks autophagy and uncovers a role for NCOA4 in ferritin degradation and iron homeostasis in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 2014;16(11):1069–79 10.1038/ncb3053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Werner G, Hagenmaier H, Drautz H, Baumgartner A, Zahner H. Metabolic products of microorganisms. 224. Bafilomycins, a new group of macrolide antibiotics. Production, isolation, chemical structure and biological activity. The Journal of antibiotics 1984;37(2):110–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vichai V, Kirtikara K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat Protoc 2006;1(3):1112–6 10.1038/nprot.2006.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aldrich LN, Kuo SY, Castoreno AB, Goel G, Kuballa P, Rees MG, et al. Discovery of a Small-Molecule Probe for V-ATPase Function. J Am Chem Soc 2015;137(16):5563–8 10.1021/jacs.5b02150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hollingshead MG, Alley MC, Camalier RF, Abbott BJ, Mayo JG, Malspeis L, et al. In vivo cultivation of tumor cells in hollow fibers. Life Sci 1995;57(2):131–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mi Q, Pezzuto JM, Farnsworth NR, Wani MC, Kinghorn AD, Swanson SM. Use of the in vivo hollow fiber assay in natural products anticancer drug discovery. J Nat Prod 2009;72(3):573–80 10.1021/np800767a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lewellen KA, Metzinger MN, Liu Y, Stack MS. Quantitation of Intra-peritoneal Ovarian Cancer Metastasis. J Vis Exp 2016(113) 10.3791/53316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Domcke S, Sinha R, Levine DA, Sander C, Schultz N. Evaluating cell lines as tumour models by comparison of genomic profiles. Nat Commun 2013;4:2126 10.1038/ncomms3126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Auersperg N, Maines-Bandiera SL, Dyck HG, Kruk PA. Characterization of cultured human ovarian surface epithelial cells: phenotypic plasticity and premalignant changes. Lab Invest 1994;71(4):510–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alley MC, Scudiero DA, Monks A, Hursey ML, Czerwinski MJ, Fine DL, et al. Feasibility of drug screening with panels of human tumor cell lines using a microculture tetrazolium assay. Cancer Res 1988;48(3):589–601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shoemaker RH. The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen. Nat Rev Cancer 2006;6(10):813–23 10.1038/nrc1951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. Autophagy 2007;3(5):452–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ju LL, Zhao CY, Ye KF, Yang H, Zhang J. Expression and clinical implication of Beclin1, HMGB1, p62, survivin, BRCA1 and ERCC1 in epithelial ovarian tumor tissues. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016;20(10):1993–2003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Spowart JE, Townsend KN, Huwait H, Eshragh S, West NR, Ries JN, et al. The autophagy protein LC3A correlates with hypoxia and is a prognostic marker of patient survival in clear cell ovarian cancer. J Pathol 2012;228(4):437–47 doi 10.1002/path.4090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kulshrestha A, Katara GK, Ginter J, Pamarthy S, Ibrahim SA, Jaiswal MK, et al. Selective inhibition of tumor cell associated Vacuolar-ATPase ‘a2’ isoform overcomes cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells. Mol Oncol 2016;10(6):789–805 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES