Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2018 Oct 2;9:4039. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06478-6

Vibrational control of selective bond cleavage in dissociative chemisorption of methanol on Cu(111)

Jialu Chen 1, Xueyao Zhou 1, Yaolong Zhang 1, Bin Jiang 1,
PMCID: PMC6168487  PMID: 30279479

Abstract

Controlling product branching ratios in a chemical reaction represents a desired but difficult achievement in chemistry. In this work, we demonstrate the first example of altering the branching ratios in a multichannel reaction, i.e., methanol dissociative chemisorption on Cu(111), via selectively exciting specific vibrational modes. To this end, we develop a globally accurate full-dimensional potential energy surface for the CH3OH/Cu(111) system and perform extensive vibrational state-selected molecular dynamics simulations. Our results show that O–H/C–H/C–O stretching vibrational excitations substantially enhance the respective bond scission processes, representing extraordinary bond selectivity. At a given total energy, the branching ratio of C–O/C–H dissociation can increase by as large as 100 times by exciting the C–O stretching mode which possesses an unprecedentedly strong vibrational efficacy on reactivity. This vibrational control can be realized by the well-designed experiment using a linearly polarized laser.


Dissociative chemisorption of methanol on metal surfaces is a key step for hydrogen production. Here the authors use quasi-quantized molecular dynamics simulations to alter the branching ratios for methanol dissociative chemisorption on Cu(111) via selectively exciting specific vibrational modes.

Introduction

Control of product branching ratios in a chemical reaction is one of the ultimate goals in chemistry. Selectively exciting a specific reagent vibrational mode is one possible way toward this goal, because of different effects of vibrational excitations on the reactivity relative to the translational excitation1. Thanks to advances in laser technology, this so-called mode specificity and the related bond selectivity have been first explored in gas-phase reactions2,3, and are now believed to be general in gas–surface reactions as well4,5. For example, as rate-limiting steps in methane steaming reforming and water–gas shift processes, respectively, methane and water dissociative chemisorption has been extensively investigated by state-of-the-art quantum-state-resolved molecular beam experiments4,69 and by first-principles quantum/classical dynamical calculations1016. It is well established that the dissociative sticking probabilities of CH4 and H2O on a variety of single-crystal metal surfaces exquisitely depend on specific vibrational excitations. Very recently, the dissociative chemisorption of CO2 on Ni(100) has also been predicted to be mode specific17.

These studies have provided unprecedented details of the nonstatistical nature of gas–surface reactions, highlighting the importance of reaction dynamics. It has been argued that the intramolecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) is far from complete prior to molecular dissociation at the surface4. As a result, mode-specific reactivity can be reasonably rationalized by a transition state-based model in the sudden limit that relies on the coupling between a vibrational motion and the reaction coordinate14,18. Alternatively, mode specificity may also be ascribed to the mode softening and vibrational nonadiabatic couplings in the reaction path Hamiltonian (RPH) wavepacket model developed by Jackson and coworkers11. In spite of significant progress, our understanding of the mode-specific chemistry is yet far from complete.

To date, detailed mode-specific reaction dynamics have been mostly demonstrated in molecules containing only a single type of chemical bond (or isotopically substituted) to be broken (i.e., O–H bond in H2O or C–H bond in CH4). For true bond selectivity, the cleaved bonds are different. It is still unclear that how a specific vibrational excitation would selectively manipulate the branching ratio of multiple bond-breaking processes in a polyatomic molecule at the surface. To answer this question, the underlying multidimensional potential energy surface (PES) globally covering multiple reaction channels is needed, but it is very challenging for gas–surface systems.

Methanol is a promising next generation of energy carrier that can be used for on-board hydrogen production and/or in direct methanol fuel cells, thanks to its easy storage and transportation requirements and high H/C ratio. The dissociative chemisorption of methanol on metal surfaces is the initial and key step for hydrogen production from methanol19. For our purposes, more importantly, methanol dissociation on metal surfaces is an ideal model system for better understanding the mode-specific and bond-selective chemistry since it involves the cleavage of three classes of chemical bonds (C–H, C–O, and O–H). It also represents a prototype of reactions of complex organic molecules on metal surfaces20.

It is generally accepted that metallic copper is the active component in the commonly used Cu-based catalysts dispersed on oxide support for methanol synthesis, decomposition, as well as steam-reforming processes19. As a consequence, much concern has been concentrated on reaction mechanisms involving methanol on copper2135. Earlier experimental studies revealed that methanol adsorbs molecularly on most low-index copper surfaces at low temperatures, while pre-covered oxygen atoms were found to significantly facilitate methanol decomposition2123. Periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations provided consistent information that methanol dissociation is highly activated on Cu(111) and Cu(110)29,30,34,35. The O–H dissociation channel is found to be most favorable, while the C–H and C–O bond scissions are very difficult. According to Polanyi’s rules36, these remarkable and product-like (“late”) dissociation barriers are likely to manifest mode specificity, as already demonstrated in the activated adsorption of CH4 and H2O on metal surfaces14. However, very few studies have focused on the dissociation dynamics of methanol37,38. The only molecular beam experiments indicated that methanol decomposition on Pt(111)37 and Ru/V alloy38 occurs at low-incidence energies with the O–H bond cleavage via a molecular precursor mechanism, in which the IVR may take place because of the long residence time and the mode specificity is less likely. To explore the potential ability of vibrational control of reactivity of a chemical reaction, we theoretically investigate the mode-specific and bond-selective reaction dynamics in CH3OH dissociative chemisorption on Cu(111).

Results

Reaction pathways and potential energy surface

In Fig. 1a, three possible reaction pathways for methanol dissociative chemisorption on the rigid Cu(111) are compared. Prior to dissociation, methanol is found to molecularly adsorb on the surface preferentially on the top site through the oxygen atom, consistent with previous theoretical results26,2935. The calculated Cu–O separation is 2.39 Å and the corresponding binding energy is −0.42 eV, indicating a weak binding character, in good agreement with the experimental values (2.69 Å39 and −0.48 eV40). The methanol-surface interaction predicted here is stronger than previous DFT predictions33,3642, suggesting the importance of including the van der Waals effects.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Reaction profile. a Energetics (in eV) and stationary point geometries (in Å) of O–H (black), C–H (red), and C–O (blue) bond cleavages for CH3OH dissociative chemisorption on Cu(111) computed by DFT. Energies in parentheses are obtained from the PES for comparison. b Minimum energy paths for these three dissociation channels on the permutation invariant polynomial neural network potential energy surface (solid lines) and DFT energies (symbols) recalculated at selected points along the respective reaction coordinate. Note that the reaction coordinate has been scaled to be in the same range

The dissociation of methanol on Cu(111) is highly activated. The O–H bond scission leads to methoxy and hydrogen atoms via the smallest barrier (labeled as TS1) of 0.79 eV with respect to free CH3OH plus Cu(111), while the barriers for breaking C–H (TS2) and C–O (TS3) bonds are 0.33 and 0.53 eV higher, respectively. Interestingly, all the transition states feature the “late” barrier characters, with the dissociating O–H, C–H, and C–O bonds substantially extended to 1.51, 1.97, and 2.32 Å, respectively. The elongation of dissociative bonds at transition states has been observed for similar H2O9, CH410, and CO2 dissociations17 on various metal surfaces, which is responsible for the vibrational enhancement on reactivity as suggested by Polanyi’s rules.

It can be seen in Fig. 1a and in additional results of Supplementary Figs 1 and 2, Supplementary Tables 1–3 and Supplementary Discussion that the permutation invariant polynomial neural network (PIP-NN) PES accurately reproduces these energetics and geometries, as well as frequencies of the stationary points. The quality of the PIP-NN PES is further supported by the excellent agreement between the predicted energies on the PES and those recalculated by DFT, at identical selected geometries on minimum energy paths (MEPs), as displayed in Fig. 1b. Interestingly, the intrinsic reaction coordinate search starting from any transition state finds ultimately the same adsorption well on the reactant side.

Figure 2 demonstrates the two-dimensional contour plots of the PES as a function of the dissociative and translational coordinates for all of three dissociation channels, with other internal coordinates involved in the reaction and molecular lateral position optimized. It is manifest that the PES well represents the dynamically relevant configuration space without unphysical holes. Both the adsorption well and “late” transition states are clearly displayed, which again validates the accuracy of the PIP-NN fit. Following the MEPs, the CH3OH molecule would first adsorb weakly in the pre-reaction well and then select one of the competitive dissociation pathways. It is emphasized that the differences of the potential topography for different reaction channels may affect the translational-to-vibrational energy transfer41, as discussed below.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Two-dimensional potential energy contour plots. O–H (a), C–H (b), and C–O (c) dissociation channels are illustrated as a function of ZO and rOH (a), ZC and rCH (b), and ZC and rCO (c), respectively, with other coordinates optimized. Red solid lines and black crosses correspond to the projected MEPs along reaction coordinates and transition states, respectively. The colored energy column is given in eV

Dissociation probabilities

The calculated probabilities for breaking the O–H, C–H, and C–O bonds in the ground state of CH3OH as a function of incidence energy (Ei) are compared in Fig. 3. With the increasing incidence energy, reaction probabilities increase monotonously, reflecting the directly activated nature of all pathways. Given the trend of barrier height, namely Eb (O–H) < Eb (C–H) < Eb (C–O), it is readily understood that O–H dissociation is the most favorable, followed by the C–H and C–O dissociations orderly. Interestingly, the O–H bond starts to break (e.g., P0 = 10−3) at Ei ≈ 0.75 eV, close to its barrier height. However, the translational energy thresholds for the other two dissociation channels (1.5 eV for C–H and 2.5 eV for C–O) are much higher than their respective barriers. Especially, the C–O bond is extremely inert and its dissociation probability is very low, and even the incidence energy is nearly twice as the barrier height. Our results indicate that the C–H and C–O dissociation channels not only have higher barriers but also require more translational energy above the barrier to open. As a result, the corresponding products are extremely unfavorable in thermal conditions, in line with experimental findings that only CH3O was observed on Cu(110)22,23. The ineffectiveness of channeling translational energy into a reaction coordinate has hitherto been observed in the site-specific dissociation of H2O on Ni(111)41 and HCl on Au(111)42, which both originate from the topography of the PES. From Fig. 2a–c, corresponding to O–H, C–H, and C–O bond scissions, respectively, the energy flow from the translational to each dissociation coordinate becomes increasingly difficult because of the shrink of the angle characterizing the “elbow” PESs. Furthermore, bond lengths of the dissociating O–H, C–H, and C–O at transition states are incrementally elongated. Both features promote the possibility of recoil when a molecule impacts on the surface with high translational velocity, thus resulting in the increasing threshold energy to open these three channels.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Dissociation probabilities. Calculated O–H/C–H/C–O dissociation probabilities as a function of normal incidence energy of CH3OH(v) on Cu(111) in its ground (v0) and first excited states with O–H stretching (1v1), C–H symmetric stretching (1v3), C–H antisymmetric stretching (1v2 (A′) and 1v9 (A″)), and three quanta overtone with C–O stretching (3v8), respectively

Effects of reactant vibrations on each reaction channel

On the other hand, vibrational excitations can dramatically change this picture since different vibrational states have different impacts on the reaction. The vibrational enhancement of the reactivity over translational enhancement can be quantified by the vibrational efficacy, which is often defined by η(v)=[Ei(0,P0)-Ei(v,P0)]ΔEv,43 where Ei(0,P0) and Ei(v,P0) are translational energies for a given reaction probability P0 of the ground (0) and vibrationally excited (v) states, and ΔEv the corresponding vibrational energy. A vibrational efficacy larger than unity illustrates that vibration is more effective in enhancing the reaction than translation. In this work, we concentrate on the influence of stretching mode excitations and compare the vibrational efficacies of the modes with similar vibrational energies, i.e., the first excited state in O–H stretching (1v1 = 3670 cm−1), C–H symmetric (1v3 = 2887 cm−1) and asymmetric stretching (1v2 (A′) = 2979 cm−1 and 1v9 (A″) = 2935 cm−1) modes, and three quanta overtone with C–O stretching (3v8 = 2970 cm−1). It should be noted that, unlike methane, none of the vibrational states in methanol is degenerate.

In Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figs 3–5, it is found that exciting a specific bond stretching mode drastically promotes the corresponding bond cleavage, while it hardly affects the other bond-breaking processes, thus representing a strong bond selectivity. For example, as listed in Table 1, 1v1 state shows a considerable enhancement for O–H dissociation with η(1v1,O-H) being in the range from 1.62 to 2.66 depending on translational energy considered in this study. This is a fairly large value compared to that of methane and water dissociation14. However, 1v1 state has a very minor effect on C–H and C–O scissions, for which the vibrational efficacies are close to zero (see Supplementary Table 4). In addition, excitations in the symmetric (1v3) and asymmetric (1v2 and 1v9) C–H stretching modes are more or less as effective as translation in promoting the C–H dissociation, with the former having a slightly higher vibrational efficacy because of its lower frequency. This is similar to the observations for methane dissociation4.

Table 1.

Calculated vibrational efficacies with respect to the overall reactivity of these influential vibrational modes in the O–H/C–H/C–O dissociation

Dissociation probabilities of (O–H/C–H/C–O) 0.001 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.05
1ν1(O–H) 1.62 1.64 1.72 1.97 2.66
1ν2(C–H) 0.95 0.86 0.89 0.92 0.94
1ν3(C–H) 1.10 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01
1ν9(C–H) 1.00 0.80 0.84 0.87 0.94
1ν8(C–O) 5.13 5.00 4.21 4.15 5.25
2ν8(C–O) 4.45 4.33 4.31 4.26 4.12
3ν8(C–O) 3.57 3.37 3.45 3.76 4.31

The most pronounced vibrational efficacy is found for the C–O stretching mode which almost exclusively facilitates the C–O dissociation. As seen in Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Fig. 5, the single quantum excitation of v8 leads to an incredible η(1v8,C-O) ranging from 4.15 to 5.21. To the best of our knowledge, this is so far the largest vibrational efficacy known among various molecular dissociations on solid surfaces. In comparison, while vibrational efficacies of both symmetric and antisymmetric C–O stretching modes in CO2 dissociation on Ni(100) are already quite large, i.e., 1.8~2.2, they are still much smaller than η(1v8,C-O) observed here. Although η(v) typically decreases with multi-quanta excitations as seen in methane and water dissociations4,9, η(2v8,C-O) and η(3v8,C-O) here are still as large as 4.12~4.45 and 3.37~4.31, respectively. As a result, the dissociation probability of C–O in the 3v8 state becomes comparable to that of C–H in the 1v3, 1v2, or 1v9 state, given the very close total energy in these states.

As more clearly seen in Fig. 4, such tremendous vibrational efficacies for the first three excited states of v8 mode gradually invert the branching ratio for C–H and C–O dissociation channels at a fixed total energy (Et, the sum of translational and vibrational energy with respect to the zero-point energy of CH3OH). At the total energy of 2.5 eV, for example, the C–H/C–O branching ratio increases roughly ten times from ~0.03 to ~0.30 via 1v8 excitation. The two-quanta v8 excitation makes C–H and C–O dissociation processes nearly equally weighted, and 3v8 excitation further promotes the C–H/C–O ratio making the C–O channel dominant, resulting in an overall ~100 times enhancement compared to the ground state value. This is an encouraging example that demonstrates the possibility of altering the branching ratios via vibrational excitations in a practical multichannel reaction, which awaits experimental validation. We note in passing that the lattice motion and electron–hole pair excitations neglected in this work may change the dissociation probability to a lesser extent in the energy range considered here, but previous results have shown that they do not qualitatively alter the mode specificity obtained in the static surface calculations4446.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Branching ratios. C–O/C–H bond dissociation ratio as a function of total energy with respect to the potential energy of free CH3OH molecule plus its zero-point energy, varying with the incremental excitation of the C–O stretching mode (v8)

Discussion

Mode specificity and bond selectivity observed in CH3OH dissociation on Cu(111) can be readily understood by the so-called sudden vector projection (SVP) model47,48. As detailed in the Supplementary Methods, this SVP model relates the effect of reactivity of a reactant mode to the overlap between the reactant mode vector Qi and the reaction coordinate vector at the transition state QRC, namely, pi=QiQRC[0,1]. We computed here an individual set of SVP values for each reaction channel separated by respective transition states. Part of them are listed in Table 2 and a more complete list can be found in Supplementary Table 5.

Table 2.

Sudden vector projection values of stretching vibrational modes and translation along surface normal associated with three transition states for various bond scissions

Symmetry Mode Labels Sudden vector projection values
TS1(O–H) TS2(C–H) TS3(C–O)
A′ OH stretching ν 1 0.869 0.033 0.013
A′ CH3 as-stretching ν 2 0.003 0.178 0.023
CH3 as-stretching ν 9 0.003 0.515 0.087
A′ CH3 s-stretching ν 3 0.005 0.508 0.104
A′ CO stretching ν 8 0.026 0.015 0.745
Translation z 0.121 0.100 0.242

First, it is worth noting that O–H, C–H, and C–O stretching modes are exclusively coupled with the corresponding reaction coordinates. For example, the ν1 mode has a particularly largest SVP value (~0.87) with TS1 and other vibrational and translational modes all have small SVP values. Similarly, for C–O dissociation, the ν8 mode couples with the reaction coordinate of the C–O dissociation barrier most strongly with p8 = 0.75, which is much larger than the SVP values of the translational modes. These results agree well with remarkable vibrational efficacies of the respective local bond-stretching excitations. On the other hand, the couplings between normal modes and the reaction coordinate for C–H dissociation are generally weaker, consistent with the smaller vibrational efficacies. Specifically, the C–H symmetric (ν3) and one of the two asymmetric stretching ν2 (A′) modes possess similar SVP value of ~0.51, while another asymmetric stretching ν9 (A″) mode couples with the reaction coordinate more weakly with p9 = 0.18. However, our QCT results show analogous enhancements of ν2 (A′) and ν9 (A″) modes that are close in energy but in different symmetries. A plausible explanation is that two states mix with each other because of their near-degenerate frequency in our quasi-classical treatment, as observed for those threefold degenerate modes in CH449,50. Experimentally, Beck and coworkers have recently observed the important role of symmetry in the nearly isoenergetic vibrations in dissociative chemisorption of CH4(2v3) on Pt(111)51. As discussed in refs. 12,52 on CHD3 dissociation, the reliability of QCT results decreases when there exist strong vibrational state couplings and energy flow in the entrance channel. An accurate interpretation of such a phenomenon requires a full-dimensional quantum mechanical description of symmetry, which is however currently too expensive if not impossible and beyond the scope of this article.

In conclusion, we have developed the first eighteen-dimensional PES for the methanol dissociative chemisorption on a Cu(111) surface with an analytical PIP-NN representation fitted with over 200 thousand DFT points. This globally accurate PES not only includes all molecular degrees of freedom but also describes the multi-channels for O–H, C–H, and C–O dissociations equivalently well. The distinct topography along each reaction pathway determines the effectiveness of translating the incident energy into the reaction coordinate and results in the very different translational energy threshold of each channel. QCT calculations on this PES indicate that the C–O bond breaking is neither kinetically (high barrier) nor dynamically (high threshold energy) favorable, having a much lower probability than the other two channels in the ground state CH3OH. It is also revealed that the excitation of the O–H/C–H/C–O stretching mode significantly facilitates the corresponding bond dissociation process, representing an unambiguous mode specificity and bond selectivity. Because of its unprecedented vibrational efficacy for C–O scission, multi-quanta C–O stretching excitations are able to invert the C–O/C–H branching ratio. The C–O and C–H dissociation probabilities become comparable at a given total energy with C–H (1v3/1v2/1v9) and C–O (3v8) stretching modes excited. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the vibrational control of the branching ratios of a reaction with multiple channels. It is expected to greatly enrich our understanding to mode-specific chemistry and offer a potential means to manipulate product branching ratios in chemical reactions. We hope that these detailed predictions can motivate further experimental tests.

Methods

Electronic structure calculations

Taking all molecular degrees of freedom into account, we report here the first globally accurate eighteen-dimensional (18D) PES for methanol dissociation on Cu(111), in which O–H, C–H, and C–O bond scissions are equally well described. Plane wave density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed via the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)53. The Cu(111) surface was represented by a slab model with 3 × 3 unit cells and four layers, in which the top two layers were optimized and then fixed at equilibrium positions. The ion–electron interactions were described using the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method54. The plane wave basis was truncated at kinetic energy of 400 eV. The electron exchange correlation was described by the optPBE-vdW functional55, including dispersion correction, which was necessary to reproduce the experimental binding energy. The 5 × 5 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack k-point grid was tested to converge the binding and activation energies within 0.05 eV.

Potential energy surface

To develop the 18D PES incorporating the surface periodicity and permutation symmetry in the molecule, the recently proposed permutation-invariant polynomial-neural network (PIP-NN) approach56,57 was employed. Specifically, 33 primitive functions satisfying the periodicity were initiated to yield 546 PIPs up to the sixth degree using the SINGULAR software58, serving as the input of NNs. The CH3OH/Cu(111) configurations were sampled iteratively to cover all three dissociation channels and converge the dissociation probabilities. Over 200,000 points were finally collected and fitted to the two-layer NNs with 18 and 100 neurons in the first and second hidden layers, respectively, based on a hybrid extreme learning machine Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm59. The resultant PES was an average of the three best fits yielding a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 37.2 meV. More details of the PES fitting, data sampling, and convergence tests can be found in the Supplementary Methods.

Quasi-classical trajectory calculations

Since a fully coupled quantum dynamical treatment of this system is still a forbidden task, we computed initial state-selected dissociation probabilities (P0) employing the quasi-classical trajectory (QCT) method. Electron–hole pair excitations have been found to have a minor effect in directly activated reactions44,60, and have been thus neglected here. Although a more quantitative comparison to an experiment may require a quantum mechanical treatment with inclusion of lattice motion45, the QCT approach, which has proven to capture the essence of mode specificity at collision energies above the barrier heights and well reproduce the bond selectivity when exciting a local stretching mode61, is adequate for our present purposes here. In addition, recent QCT-based ab initio molecular dynamics applications have reproduced measured dissociative sticking coefficients well above reaction barriers for CHD3 on both flat (Ni(111) and Pt(111)) and stepped (Pt(211)) surfaces within chemical accuracy12,52. Overall, up to 106 trajectories have been run in a wide range of translational energies for different initial states. More details and additional results are given in the Supplementary Methods.

Electronic supplementary material

Peer Review File (77.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0303500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (21573203, 91645202, and 21722306), and Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies. We appreciate the Supercomputing Center of USTC and AM-HPC for high-performance computing services. We thank Prof. Hua Guo for many helpful suggestions.

Author contributions

B.J. designed this project, J.C. performed the first-principles calculations and PES fitting, and X.Z. and Y.Z. helped on the data sampling and NN codes. J.C. and B.J. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and commented on the manuscript.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-06478-6.

References

  • 1.Zare RN. Laser control of chemical reactions. Science. 1998;279:1875–1879. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5358.1875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Crim FF. Vibrational state control of bimolecular reactions: discovering and directing the chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999;32:877–884. doi: 10.1021/ar950046a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu K. Vibrational control of bimolecular reactions with methane by mode, bond, and stereo selectivity. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2016;67:91–111. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Juurlink LBF, Killelea DR, Utz AL. State-resolved probes of methane dissociation dynamics. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2009;84:69–134. doi: 10.1016/j.progsurf.2009.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chadwick H, Beck RD. Quantum state-resolved studies of chemisorption reactions. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2017;68:39–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-044910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beck RD, et al. Vibrational mode-specific reaction of methane on a nickel surface. Science. 2003;302:98–100. doi: 10.1126/science.1088996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smith RR, Killelea DR, DelSesto DF, Utz AL. Preference for vibrational over translational energy in a gas-surface reaction. Science. 2004;304:992–995. doi: 10.1126/science.1096309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Killelea DR, Campbell VL, Shuman NS, Utz AL. Bond-selective control of a heterogeneously catalyzed reaction. Science. 2008;319:790–793. doi: 10.1126/science.1152819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hundt PM, Jiang B, van Reijzen M, Guo H, Beck RD. Vibrationally promoted dissociation of water on Ni(111) Science. 2014;344:504–507. doi: 10.1126/science.1251277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nave S, Jackson B. Methane dissociation on Ni(111): the role of lattice reconstruction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:173003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.173003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jackson B, Nave S. The dissociative chemisorption of methane on Ni(100): reaction path description of mode-selective chemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 2011;135:114701. doi: 10.1063/1.3634073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nattino F, et al. Chemically accurate simulation of a polyatomic molecule-metal surface reaction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:2402–2406. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang Z, Liu T, Fu B, Yang X, Zhang DH. First-principles quantum dynamical theory for the dissociative chemisorption of H2O on rigid Cu(111) Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11953. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jiang B, Yang M, Xie D, Guo H. Quantum dynamics of polyatomic dissociative chemisorption on transition metal surfaces: mode specificity and bond selectivity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:3621–3640. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00360A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang B. Rotational and steric effects in water dissociative chemisorption on Ni (111) Chem. Sci. 2017;8:6662–6669. doi: 10.1039/C7SC02659E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jiang B, et al. Mode selectivity in methane dissociative chemisorption on Ni(111) Chem. Sci. 2013;4:3249–3254. doi: 10.1039/c3sc51040a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jiang B, Guo H. Communication: enhanced dissociative chemisorption of CO2 via vibrational excitation. J. Chem. Phys. 2016;144:091101. doi: 10.1063/1.4943002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jiang B, Guo H. Relative efficacy of vibrational vs. translational excitation in promoting atom-diatom reactivity: rigorous examination of Polanyi’s rules and proposition of sudden vector projection (SVP) model. J. Chem. Phys. 2013;138:234104. doi: 10.1063/1.4810007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Palo DR, Dagle RA, Holladay JD. Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:3992–4021. doi: 10.1021/cr050198b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miller AV, Kaichev VV, Prosvirin IP, Bukhtiyarov VI. Mechanistic study of methanol decomposition and oxidation on Pt(111) J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117:8189–8197. doi: 10.1021/jp3122177. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bowker M, Madix RJ. XPS, UPS and thermal desorption studies of alcohol adsorption on Cu(110): I. Methanol. Surf. Sci. 1980;95:190–206. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(80)90135-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Russell JN, Gates SM, Yates JT. Reaction of methanol with Cu(111) and Cu(111)+O(ads) Surf. Sci. 1985;163:516–540. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(85)91077-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sexton BA, Hughes AE, Avery NR. A spectroscopic study of the adsorption and reactions of methanol, formaldehyde and methyl formate on clean and oxygenated Cu(110) surfaces. Surf. Sci. 1985;155:366–386. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(85)90423-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jiang CJ, Trimm DL, Wainwright MS, Cant NW. Kinetic study of steam reforming of methanol over copper-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. A. 1993;93:245–255. doi: 10.1016/0926-860X(93)85197-W. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ammon C, et al. Dissociation and oxidation of methanol on Cu(110) Surf. Sci. 2002;507:845–850. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(02)01361-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Greeley J, Mavrikakis M. Methanol decomposition on Cu(111): a DFT Study. J. Catal. 2002;208:291–300. doi: 10.1006/jcat.2002.3586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sakong S, Sendner C, Gross A. Partial oxidation of methanol on Cu(110): energetics and kinetics. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2006;771:117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2006.04.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Papavasiliou J, Avgouropoulos G, Ioannides T. Steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis of steam reforming of methanol over Cu-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. B. 2009;88:490. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.10.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mei DH, Xu LJ, Henkelman G. Potential energy surface of methanol decomposition on Cu(110) J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009;113:4522–4537. doi: 10.1021/jp808211q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gu XK, Li WX. First-principles study on the origin of the different selectivities for methanol steam reforming on Cu(111) and Pd(111) J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010;114:21539–21547. doi: 10.1021/jp107678d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lin S, Xie D, Guo H. The methyl formate pathway in methanol steam reforming on copper: density functional calculations. ACS Catal. 2011;1:1263–1271. doi: 10.1021/cs200311t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lin S, Johnson RS, Smith GK, Xie D, Guo H. Pathways for methanol steam reforming involving adsorbed formaldehyde and hydroxyl intermediates on Cu(111): density functional theory studies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011;13:9622–9631. doi: 10.1039/c1cp20067d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zuo ZJ, Wang L, Han PD, Huang W. Insights into the reaction mechanisms of methanol decomposition, methanol oxidation and steam reforming of methanol on Cu(111): a density functional theory study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2014;39:1664–1679. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.García-Muelas R, Li Q, López N. Density functional theory comparison of methanol decomposition and reverse reactions on metal surfaces. ACS Catal. 2015;5:1027-–11036. doi: 10.1021/cs501698w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li J, Zhou GW. Density functional theory study of O-H and C-H bond scission of methanol catalyzed by a chemisorbed oxygen layer on Cu(111) Surf. Sci. 2016;646:288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2015.11.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Polanyi JC. Some concepts in reaction dynamics. Science. 1987;236:680–690. doi: 10.1126/science.236.4802.680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Diekhoner L, Butler DA, Baurichter A, Luntz AC. Parallel pathways in methanol decomposition on Pt(111) Surf. Sci. 1998;409:384–391. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00298-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schennach R, Eichler A, Rendulic KD. Adsorption and desorption of methanol on Pd(111) and on a Pd/V surface alloy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003;107:2552–2558. doi: 10.1021/jp021841q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Johnston SM, Mulligan A, Dhanak V, Kadodwala M. The structure of methanol and methoxy on Cu(111) Surf. Sci. 2003;530:111–119. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(03)00385-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Koitaya T, et al. Systematic study of adsorption and the reaction of methanol on three model catalysts: Cu(111), Zn-Cu(111), and oxidized Zn-Cu(111) J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121:25402–25410. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jiang B, Guo H. Dynamics of water dissociative chemisorption on Ni(111): effects of impact sites and incident angles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:166101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.166101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu T, Fu B, Zhang DH. Six-dimensional quantum dynamics study for the dissociative adsorption of DCl on Au(111) surface. J. Chem. Phys. 2014;140:144701. doi: 10.1063/1.4870594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Luntz AC. A simple model for associative desorption and dissociative chemisorption. J. Chem. Phys. 2000;113:6901. doi: 10.1063/1.1311280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jiang B, Alducin M, Guo H. Electron–hole pair effects in polyatomic dissociative chemisorption: water on Ni(111) J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:327–331. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Guo H, Farjamnia A, Jackson B. Effects of lattice motion on dissociative chemisorption: toward a rigorous comparison of theory with molecular beam experiments. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:4576–4584. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tiwari AK, Nave S, Jackson B. The temperature dependence of methane dissociation on Ni(111) and Pt(111): mixed quantum-classical studies of the lattice response. J. Chem. Phys. 2010;132:134702. doi: 10.1063/1.3357415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jiang B, Guo H. Relative efficacy of vibrational vs. translational excitation in promoting atom-diatom reactivity: rigorous examination of Polanyi’s rules and proposition of sudden vector projection (SVP) model. J. Chem. Phys. 2013;138:234104. doi: 10.1063/1.4810007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Guo H, Jiang B. The sudden vector projection model for reactivity: mode specificity and bond selectivity made simple. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014;47:3679–3685. doi: 10.1021/ar500350f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Czakó G, Shepler BC, Braams BJ, Bowman JM. Accurate ab initio potential energy surface, dynamics, and thermochemistry of the F+CH4→HF+CH3 reaction. J. Chem. Phys. 2009;130:084301. doi: 10.1063/1.3068528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jiang B, Guo H. Mode and bond selectivities in methane dissociative chemisorption: quasi-classical trajectory studies on twelve-dimensional potential energy surface. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117:16127–16135. doi: 10.1021/jp405720c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hundt PM, van Reijzen ME, Ueta H, Beck RD. Vibrational activation of methane chemisorption: the role of symmetry. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014;5:1963–1967. doi: 10.1021/jz500728d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Migliorini D, et al. Surface reaction barriometry: methane dissociation on flat and stepped transition metal surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017;8:4177–4182. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kresse G, Furthmuller J. Efficiency of ab initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using plane wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 1996;6:15–50. doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Blochl PE. Project augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;50:17953–17979. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jiří K, David RB, Angelos M. Chemical accuracy for the van der Waals density functional. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2010;22:022201. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/2/022201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jiang B, Guo H. Permutation invariant polynomial neural network approach to fitting potential energy surfaces. III. Molecule-surface interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 2014;141:034109. doi: 10.1063/1.4887363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jiang B, Li J, Guo H. Potential energy surfaces from high fidelity fitting of ab initio points: the permutation invariant polynomial-neural network approach. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2016;35:479–506. doi: 10.1080/0144235X.2016.1200347. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Greuel, G.-M., Pfister, G. & Schönemann, H. SINGULAR 4-1-0—A computer algebra system for polynomial computations. http://www.singular.uni-kl.de (2016).
  • 59.Zhang Yl, Zhou Xy, Jiang B. Accelerating the construction of neural network potential energy surfaces: a fast hybrid training algorithm. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 2018;30:727–734. doi: 10.1063/1674-0068/30/cjcp1711212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Juaristi JI, Alducin M, Muiño RD, Busnengo HF, Salin A. Role of electron-hole pair excitations in the dissociative adsorption of diatomic molecules on metal surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;100:116102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.116102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhou X, et al. Dissociative chemisorption of methane on Ni(111) using a chemically accurate fifteen dimensional potential energy surface. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017;19:30540–30550. doi: 10.1039/C7CP05993K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (77.4KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES