Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Oct 2;8:14669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32856-7

Defects, Dopants and Sodium Mobility in Na2MnSiO4

Navaratnarajah Kuganathan 1,, Alexander Chroneos 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6168608  PMID: 30279505

Abstract

Sodium manganese orthosilicate, Na2MnSiO4, is a promising positive electrode material in rechargeable sodium ion batteries. Atomistic scale simulations are used to study the defects, doping behaviour and sodium migration paths in Na2MnSiO4. The most favourable intrinsic defect type is the cation anti-site (0.44 eV/defect), in which, Na and Mn exchange their positions. The second most favourable defect energy process is found to be the Na Frenkel (1.60 eV/defect) indicating that Na diffusion is assisted by the formation of Na vacancies via the vacancy mechanism. Long range sodium paths via vacancy mechanism were constructed and it is confirmed that the lowest activation energy (0.81 eV) migration path is three dimensional with zig-zag pattern. Subvalent doping by Al on the Si site is energetically favourable suggesting that this defect engineering stratergy to increase the Na content in Na2MnSiO4 warrants experimental verification.

Introduction

Sodium ion batteries have attracted attention as a dominant power source in large scale energy storage applications due to the low cost and high abundance of sodium as compared to lithium13.

New class of cathode materials providing large quantity of Na ions in sodium batteries can lead to the high power density and high energy density. Several promising sodium based cathode materials such as NaFePO446, Na2FePO4F7,8, Na3V2(PO4)39,10 and NaxTMO2 (TM = Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni)1113 were reported in the experimental studies. Discovery of novel cathode materials is still active to produce high capacity battery to satisfy the growing demand.

Orthosilicate Na2MnSiO4 has been recently proposed as a promising Na storage material because of its impressive sodium storage performance, low cost and environmentally benign1419. The structural stability of this material is mainly provided by the (SiO4)4− matrix via strong Si-O bonds. Further, it may be possible to extract more than one sodium more readily from Na2MnSiO4 since Mn can form the Mn4+ oxidation state. Chen et al.15 synthesized Na2MnSiO4 by a sol-gel method and reported a reversible capacity of 125 mAhg−1 at a rate of C/10 using an ionic liquid electrolyte at elevated temperatures. Law et al.14 prepared Na2MnSiO4 via a modified two-step route and reported an impressive sodium storage performance of 210 mAhg−1 at 0.1 C. Using first-principles calculations, Zhang et al.19 investigated ion diffusion mechanism of Na2MnSiO4 and concluded that the Na ion diffusion is faster than Li ion diffusion in Li2MnSiO4. There are a limited number of experimental and theoretical work reported in the literature.

As experiments cannot provide detailed information about the defects and Na ion diffusion paths with activation energies, classical modelling techniques are widely used to calculate those properties. This theoretical approach has been successfully applied on a wide range of lithium ion battery materials and a few sodium ion battery materials2025. Very recently, we have applied this simulation technique to examine the defect chemistry, lithium transport and the effect of dopants on lithium vacancy formation on the Li5FeO426, Li2CuO227 and Li9V3(P2O7)3(PO4)28. The present study uses atomistic modeling techniques to calculate the energetics for the formation of defects, solution of trivalent dopants and Na ion diffusion paths in Na2MnSiO4.

Results and Discussion

Na2MnSiO4 structure

The crystal structure of Na2MnSiO4 exhibits a monoclinic crystallographic structure with space group Pn (lattice parameters a = 7.02857 Å, b = 5.60957 Å, c = 5.33391 Å, α = 90.0°, β = 89.7949° and γ = 90°) as reported by Nalbandyan et al.16 In the Fig. 1, crystal structure of Na2MnSiO4 is shown together with bonding nature of all cations forming corner-sharing tetrahedral units with four O atoms. First, experimental monoclinic crystal structure was reproduced using classical pair potentials as tabulated in Table S1 in the Supplementary Information. There is an excellent agreement between experimental and calculated equilibriumlattice constants (refer to Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crystal structure of Na2MnSiO4 (space group Pn).

Table 1.

Calculated and Experimental Structural Parameters for Monoclinic (Pn) Na2MnSiO4.

Parameter Calc Expt13 |∆| (%)
a (Å) 6.995595 7.028570 0.47
b (Å) 5.644977 5.609570 0.63
c (Å) 5.334769 5.333910 0.02
α (°) 90.0000 90.0000 0.00
β (°) 89.7683 89.7949 0.03
γ (°) 90.0000 90.0000 0.00

Intrinsic defect processes

Next we calculated different isolated point defects including vacancies and interstitials to calculate the Frenkel and Schottky-type defect formation energies in Na2MnSiO4. These intrinsic defect energetics can provide useful information about the electrochemical behavior of Na2MnSiO4. Here we write equations for the Frenkel, Schottky and anti-site defect formation using the Kröger-Vink notation29.

NaFrenkel:NaNaXVNa+Nai 1
MnFrenkel:MnMnXVMn+Mni 2
OFrenkel:OOXVO+Oi 3
SiFrenkel:SiSiXVSi+Sii 4
Schottky:2NaNaX+MnMnX+SiSiX+4OOX2VNa+VMn+VSi+4VO+Na2MnSiO4 5
Na2OSchottky:2NaNaX+OOX2VNa+VO+Na2O 6
MnOSchottky:MnMnX+OOXVMn+VO+MnO 7
SiO2Schottky:SiSiX+2OOXVSi+2VO+SiO2 8
Na/Mnantisite(isolated):NaNaX+MnMnXNaMn+MnNa 9
Na/Mnantisite(cluster):NaNaX+MnMnX{NaMn:MnNa}X 10

Figure 2 shows the reaction energies for these intrinsic defect processes (refer to Table S2 for the energies). Na-Mn anti-site was calculated to be the most favorable intrinsic disorder meaning that at high temperatures a small percentage of Na on Mn sites (NaMn) and Mn on Na sites (MnNa) will be observed. In the relaxed defect structure, a small amount of distortion is observed in the cation-oxygen bond lengths and bond angles, but overall structure of the lattice was not distorted significantly. This type of defect has been observed experimentally in different class of Li ion cathode battery materials during cycling and theoretically in some as prepared Na ion cathode materials2325,3035. The Na Frenkel was found to be the second most favourable defect process. The Frenkel and Schottky defect energies were calculated to be highly endothermic meaning that they are unfavorable. The formation enthalpy of Na2O Schottky (relation 6) is 3.25 eV per defect (refer to Table S2, Supplementary Information). At elevated temperatures, this process can take place to form further VNa and VO.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Energetics of intrinsic defect process in monoclinic Na2MnSiO4.

Sodium ion-diffusion

The intrinsic sodium ion diffusion of Na2MnSiO4 is discussed in this section. Activation energy of Na ion diffusion together with diffusion paths are important when Na2MnSiO4 is assessed as a potential material in sodium ion batteries. The current computaional technique enables the calculation of Na diffusion paths together with activation energies, which are diffcult to investigate by experiments. For the Na vacancy migration, four Na local hops (A, B, C and D) were identified. Hop A is between two Na sites with the jump distance of 3.2687 Å and the migration energy is calculated to be 0.77 eV (refer to Table 2). The migration path for hop A is in the ac plane and Na ion moves via a curved trajectory. In the hop B, Na ions diffuses in the ac plane with a curved trajectory but the jump distance of 3.3041 Å and migration energy of 0.81 eV which are different from those calculated for hop A. Hops C and D are in the ab plane with each forming curve trajectories. Their jump distances are 3.4568 Å and 3.3350 Å with corresponding migration energies of 0.98 eV and 0.63 eV respectively. Two possible three dimensional lower energy long range paths (A → B → A → B) and (C → D → C → D) connecting local Na hops were identified as shown in Fig. 3. These two paths exhibited zig-zag pattern with overall activation energies of 0.81 eV and 0.98 eV respectively. We considered other possible long range paths connecting local Na hops. However, the lowest overall activation energy was calculated to be 0.81 eV. Figure 4 reports the energy profile diagrams for Na local hops with activation energies. Zhang et al.19 calculated the ion diffusion mechanism in Li2MnSiO4 and Na2MnSiO4 using density functional theory and concluded that Na+ migration has relatively lower activation energy barrier than that of Li+ migration. In our previous modelling for monoclinic Li2MnSiO4, the lowest over all activation energy for Li ion migration is 1.58 eV21. In the current study, the lowest overall Na ion migration barrier is calculated to be 0.81 eV much lower than that found for Li ion migration in agreement with the study of Zhang et al.19. Furthermore, in their study, Na+ ion migrate via three dimensional channels and the overall activation energy is calculated to be 0.54 eV. The activation energy difference is due to two different methodologies. Also density functional theory (DFT) is constrained by finite size effects. Small system sizes are a well-known source of error in DFT calculations. Furthermore, in the present study, ions were treated as fully charged as point defects in a highly ionic material might be expected to be in their fully ionic charge states. The position of the highest potential energy along the migration path is defined as the activation energy of migration.

Table 2.

Calculated Na-Na separations and activation energies for the sodium ion migration between two adjacent Na sites refer to Fig. 3.

Migration path Na-Na separation (Å) Activation energy (eV)
A 3.2687 0.77
B 3.3041 0.81
C 3.4568 0.98
D 3.2250 0.63

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Possible long range sodium vacancy migration paths considered. Local Na migration paths are shown in green, yellow, white and purple atoms. SiO4 and MnO4 tetrahedral units are shown blue and pink colors respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Four different energy profiles [as shown in Fig. 3] of Na vacancy hopping between two adjacent Na sites in Na2MnSiO4.

Trivalent doping

Incorporation of additional sodium into the as-prepared material will enhance the capacity and further increase the applicability of Na2MnSiO4 as a potential cathode material for sodium ion batteries. A possible approach to incorporate additional Na is by doping trivalent cations on Si site through creating Na interstitials. Similar approach has been previously demonstrated in Li2MnSiO4 cathode material21. Here we considered the solution of R2O3 (R = Al, Ga, Sc, In, Y, Gd and La) via the following process (in Kröger-Vink notation):

R2O3+2SiSiX+Na2O2RSi+2Nai+2SiO2 11

We report the solution energies of R2O3 in Fig. 5. Our calculation reveals that the most favorable dopant solution energy is found for Al3+. This suggests that a possible synthesis-doping strategy of introducing additional sodium into Na2MnSiO4, although the exact amount of Al incorporation cannot be predicted. The possible composition of Al-doped Na2MnSiO4 would be Na2+xMnSi1−xAlxO4 (x = 0.0–1.0). The second most favorable dopant is Ga3+. The solution energy increases further with the dopant size.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Enthalpy of solution of R2O3 (R = Al, Ga, Sc, In, Y, Gd and La) with respect to the R3+ ionic radius in Na2MnSiO4.

Figure 6 shows the dopants forming tetrahedral units with adjacent oxygen atoms together with dopant-oxygen bond lengths and oxygen-dopant-oxygen bond angles. For comparison, the tetrahedral SiO4 unit in the relaxed structure of defect free Na2MnSiO4. The ionic radii of Si4+ and Al3+ in tetrahedral coordination are 0.26 Å and 0.39 Å respectively. The ionic radius of Al3+ is 0.13 Å larger than that of Si4+. In the SiO4 unit, all four Si-O bonds (~1.630 Å) are equal. In AlO4 unit, Al-O bond lengths (~1.760 Å) and bond angles are slightly larger than that found in SiO4 unit and smaller than that found in other RO4 (R = Ga, Sc, In, Y, Gd and La) units. This is reflected in the lowest solution energy for Al. The ionic radius of Ga3+ is 0.47 Å slightly larger (by 0.09 Å) than that that of Al3+. There is a slight increase in the Ga-O bond lengths and bond angles. This is reflected in the second lowest solution enthalpy. From Sc3+ to La3+, solution enthalpy steadily increases with ionic radius reflecting in the bond lengths and bond angles. Highly endothermic solution energy values indicate that they will not occur at low temperatures. At elevated temperatures, this process would become feasible.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Tetrahedral SiO4 unit in the relaxed structure of undoped Na2MnSiO4 and the coordination formed by the dopants on the Si site with neighbour oxygen.

Summary

In conclusion, the atomistic simulation techniques were employed to calculate intrinsic defects, sodium ion diffusion paths and trivalent doping in order to assess Na2MnSiO4 as a promising sodium battery cathode. The dominant energy defect process is Na-Mn anti-site defect suggesting that there would be small intrinsic concentration of Mn on Na sites at operating temperatures. The long range Na ion diffusion path with lowest migration energy was calculated to be three dimensional with the migration energy of 0.81 eV. Solution energies of R2O3 (R = Al, Ga, Sc, In, Y, Gd and La) were calculated to increase extra Na ions in Na2MnSiO4. Our calculation suggests that doping Al3+ on Si site is an efficient strategy to increase the Na content in Na2MnSiO4 requiring experimental investigation.

Computational methods

In the present study we have used the classical pair potential methodology using the GULP package36. In essence this is based on the Born model for ionic crystals. The interionic interactions are long-range (attractive: Coulombic) and short-range (repulsive: electron-electron repulsion). For the latter we employed well established Buckingham potentials (Table S1, Supplementary Information)21,23,3741. The relaxation of the atomic positions and lattice parameters was achieved by employing the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) algorithm42. For the lattice relaxation round defects the Mott-Littleton method43 (inner spherical region larger than 700 ions) immediately. Na was placed and fixed at 7 interstitial positions in a linear route between two vacancy sites (all other ions were allowed to relax). Using this series of calculations the maximum energy corresponds to the activation energy of migration along the route. Here we have employed the full charge ionic model with the calculations in the dilute limit. These are sufficient and will correctly calculate trends in energies, however, defect energies are bound to be overestimated44,45.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information (20.8KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

Computational facilities and support were provided by High Performance Computing Centre at Imperial College London.

Author Contributions

N.K. performed the calculations. All the authors analyzed and discussed the results and contributed to the writing of the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Navaratnarajah Kuganathan, Email: n.kuganathan@imperial.ac.uk.

Alexander Chroneos, Email: alexander.chroneos@imperial.ac.uk.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-32856-7.

References

  • 1.Ellis BL, Nazar LF. Sodium and sodium-ion energy storage batteries. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2012;16:168–177. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2012.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yabuuchi N, Kubota K, Dahbi M, Komaba S. Research Development on Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:11636–11682. doi: 10.1021/cr500192f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Palomares V, Casas-Cabanas M, Castillo-Martinez E, Han MH, Rojo T. Update on Na-based battery materials. A growing research path. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6:2312–2337. doi: 10.1039/c3ee41031e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oh S-M, Myung S-T, Hassoun J, Scrosati B, Sun Y-K. Reversible NaFePO4 electrode for sodium secondary batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2012;22:149–152. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.06.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fang Y, et al. High-Performance Olivine NaFePO4 Microsphere Cathode Synthesized by Aqueous Electrochemical Displacement Method for Sodium Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:17977–17984. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b04691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tang W, et al. High-performance NaFePO4 formed by aqueous ion-exchange and its mechanism for advanced sodium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:4882–489. doi: 10.1039/C6TA01111J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kawabe Y, et al. Synthesis and electrode performance of carbon coated Na2FePO4F for rechargeable Na batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2011;13:1225–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.08.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kosova NV, Podugolnikov VR, Devyatkina ET, Slobodyuk AB. Structure and electrochemistry of NaFePO4 and Na2FePO4F cathode materials prepared via mechanochemical route. Mater. Res. Bull. 2014;60:849–857. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.09.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jian Z, et al. Carbon coated Na3V2(PO4)3 as novel electrode material for sodium ion batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2012;14:86–89. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jiang X, et al. Extending the cycle life of Na3V2(PO4)3 cathodes in sodium-ion batteries through interdigitated carbon scaffolding. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:14669–14674. doi: 10.1039/C6TA05030A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Han MH, Gonzalo E, Singh G, Rojo T. A Comprehensive review of sodium layered oxides: Powerful cathodes for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8:81–102. doi: 10.1039/C4EE03192J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guo S, et al. Cation-mixing stabilized layered oxide cathodes for sodium-ion batteries. Sci. Bull. 2018;63:376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sun, Y., Guo, S. & Zhou, H. Adverse effects of interlayer-gliding in layered transition-metal oxides on electrochemical sodium-ion storage. Energy Environ. Sci (2018).
  • 14.Law M, Ramar V, Balaya P. Na2MnSiO4 as an attractive high capacity cathode material for sodium-ion battery. J. Power Sources. 2017;359:277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen C-Y, Matsumoto K, Nohira T, Hagiwara R. Na2MnSiO4 as a positive electrode material for sodium secondary batteries using an ionic liquid electrolyte. Electrochem. Commun. 2014;45:63–66. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.05.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nalbandyan VB, et al. A2MnXO4 Family (A = Li, Na, Ag; X = Si, Ge): Structural and Magnetic Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2017;56:14023–14039. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xia N, et al. Electrochemical performances of Na2MnSiO4 as an energy storage material in sodium-ion capacitors. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2017;47:343–349. doi: 10.1007/s10800-016-1038-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhu H, Wang J, Liu X, Zhu X. Facile preparation of a Na2MnSiO4/C/graphene composite as a high performance cathode for sodium ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2017;7:14145–14151. doi: 10.1039/C7RA00198C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang P, et al. Ion diffusion mechanism in Pn NaxLi2−xMnSiO4. Cryst Eng Comm. 2015;17:2123–2128. doi: 10.1039/C4CE02462A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Islam MS, Driscoll DJ, Fisher CAJ, Slater PR. Atomic-scale investigation of defects, dopants, and lithium transport in the LiFePO4 olivine-type battery material. Chem. Mater. 2005;17:5085–5092. doi: 10.1021/cm050999v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kuganathan N, Islam MS. Li2MnSiO4 Lithium Battery Material: Atomic-Scale Study of Defects, Lithium Mobility, and Trivalent Dopants. Chem. Mater. 2009;21:5196–5202. doi: 10.1021/cm902163k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fisher CAJ, Kuganathan N, Islam MS. Defect chemistry and lithium-ion migration in polymorphs of the cathode material Li2MnSiO4. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2013;1:4207–4214. doi: 10.1039/c3ta00111c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Treacher JC, Wood SM, Islam MS, Kendrick E. Na2CoSiO4 as a cathode material for sodium-ion batteries: structure, electrochemistry and diffusion pathways. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:32744–32752. doi: 10.1039/C6CP06777H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wood SM, Eames C, Kendrick E, Islam MS. Sodium Ion Diffusion and Voltage Trends in Phosphates Na4M3(PO4)2P2O7 (M = Fe, Mn, Co, Ni) for Possible High-Rate Cathodes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:15935–15941. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04648. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Clark JM, Barpanda P, Yamada A, Islam MS. Sodium-ion battery cathodes Na2FeP2O7 and Na2MnP2O7: diffusion behaviour for high rate performance. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:11807–11812. doi: 10.1039/C4TA02383H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kuganathan N, Iyngaran P, Chroneos A. Lithium diffusion in Li5FeO4. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:5832. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24168-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kordatos A, Kuganathan N, Kelaidis N, Iyngaran P, Chroneos A. Defects and lithium migration in Li2CuO2. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:6754. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25239-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kuganathan N, Ganeshalingam S, Chroneos A. Defects, Dopants and Lithium Mobility in Li9V3(P2O7)3(PO4)2. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:8140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26597-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kröger, F. A. & Vink, H. J. In Solid State Physics Vol. 3 (eds Frederick Seitz & David Turnbull) 307–435 (Academic Press, 1956).
  • 30.Nyten A, Kamali S, Haggstrom L, Gustafsson T, Thomas JO. The lithium extraction/insertion mechanism in Li2FeSiO4. J. Mater. Chem. 2006;16:2266–2272. doi: 10.1039/B601184E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ensling D, Stjerndahl M, Nyten A, Gustafsson T, Thomas JO. A comparative XPS surface study of Li2FeSiO4/C cycled with LiTFSI- and LiPF6-based electrolytes. J. Mater. Chem. 2009;19:82–88. doi: 10.1039/B813099J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu H, et al. Effects of Antisite Defects on Li Diffusion in LiFePO4 Revealed by Li Isotope Exchange. J. Phys. Chem C. 2017;121:12025–12036. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02819. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kempaiah Devaraju M, Duc Truong Q, Hyodo H, Sasaki Y, Honma I. Synthesis, characterization and observation of antisite defects in LiNiPO4 nanomaterials. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:11041. doi: 10.1038/srep11041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Armstrong AR, Kuganathan N, Islam MS, Bruce PG. Structure and lithium transport pathways in Li2FeSiO4 Cathodes for Lithium Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:13031–13035. doi: 10.1021/ja2018543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Politaev VV, Petrenko AA, Nalbandyan VB, Medvedev BS, Shvetsova ES. Crystal structure, phase relations and electrochemical properties of monoclinic Li2MnSiO4. J. Solid State Chem. 2007;180:1045–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2007.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gale JD, Rohl AL. The General Utility Lattice Program (GULP) Molec. Simul. 2003;29:291–341. doi: 10.1080/0892702031000104887. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Grimes RW. Solution of MgO, CaO and TiO2 in a-Al2O3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1994;77:378–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07005.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grimes RW, et al. The effects of ion size on solution mechanism and defect cluster geometry. Ber. Bunden-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1997;101:1204–1210. doi: 10.1002/bbpc.199700026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McCoy MA, Grimes RW, Lee WE. Planar intergrowth structures in the ZnO–In2O3 System. Philos. Mag. A. 1997;76:1187–1201. doi: 10.1080/01418619708214222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Busker G, Chroneos A, Grimes RW, Chen I-W. Solution mechanisms for dopant oxides in yttria. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999;82:1553–1559. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01954.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tabira Y, Withers RL, Minervini L, Grimes RW. Systematic structural change in selected rare earth oxide pyrochlores as determined by wide-angle CBED and a comparison with the results of atomistic computer simulation. ‎J. Solid State Chem. 2000;153:16–25. doi: 10.1006/jssc.2000.8712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gale JD. GULP: A computer program for the symmetry-adapted simulation of solids. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1997;93:629–637. doi: 10.1039/a606455h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mott NF, Littleton MJ. Conduction in polar crystals. I. Electrolytic conduction in solid salts. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1938;34:485–499. doi: 10.1039/tf9383400485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rushton MJD, Chroneos A. Impact of uniaxial strain and doping on oxygen diffusion in CeO2. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:6068. doi: 10.1038/srep06068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jay EE, Rushton MJD, Chroneos A, Grimes RW, Kilner JA. Genetics of superionic conductivity in lithium lanthanum titanates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17:178–183. doi: 10.1039/C4CP04834B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (20.8KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES