Skip to main content
NCBI home page
FEBS Open Bio logoLink to FEBS Open Bio
. 2018 Sep 21;8(10):1658–1668. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12514

Rab32‐related antimicrobial pathway is involved in the progression of dextran sodium sulfate‐induced colitis

Xiaodong Xie 1,2, Qingshan Ni 1,2, Daxue Zhou 1,2, Ying Wan 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC6168699  PMID: 30338217

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multifactorial disease involving defective immune responses against invasive microbiota. Genes associated with innate immune responses to microbes have been highlighted in the pathogenesis of IBD. To determine the role of Rab32 in the pathogenesis of IBD, we administered dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) to CD11c+ cell‐specific Rab32 knockout (CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f) mice to induce colitis. Rab32 deficiency in CD11c+ cells resulted in more severe disease progression and increased mortality. Histopathological analysis showed extensive damage to the colon mucosa in DSS‐treated CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice, including more severe damage to the epithelial layer and crypts, as well as more inflammatory cell infiltration. The pro‐inflammatory cytokines IL1A, IL1B, IL6, and CSF3 and chemokines CXCL1 and CXCL2 were significantly increased, and the frequency of CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils was higher in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f colitis mice. Furthermore, CD11c+ cells deficient for Rab32 exhibited a significant increase in bacterial translocation in inflamed colon tissue. The present data demonstrate that Rab32 knockout in CD11c+ cells aggravates the development of DSS‐induced colitis and suggest that the Rab32‐related antimicrobial pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of IBD.

Keywords: bacteria, CD11c+ cells, colitis, inflammation, inflammatory bowel disease, Rab32

Abbreviations

BMDC

bone marrow‐derived dendritic cell

BMDM

bone marrow‐derived macrophage

CD

Crohn's disease

CFU

colony‐forming unit

DC

dendritic cell

DSS

dextran sodium sulfate

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

IEL

intraepithelial lymphocyte

LPL

lamina propria lymphocyte

MLN

mesenteric lymphoid node

MP

macrophage

rDNA

ribosome DNA

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory disorder in the digestive tract that comprises two main types, Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis. Abdominal pain, diarrhoea and rectal bleeding are common symptoms of IBD patients 1, 2. Since the 1950s, the incidence of IBD has increased, and currently, the prevalence of this disease is up to 0.5% of the general population in Western countries 3, 4. The pathogenesis of IBD is multifactorial, including environmental factors, genetic susceptibility, dysregulated immunity and infectious microbes 5. Genomic studies have identified more than 200 loci containing IBD susceptibility genes, focusing on critical pathways involved in innate immunity, autophagy, lymphocyte differentiation and chemotaxis 6, 7.

Among these loci, a number of genes associated with microbial sensing (NOD2, REL, IRF5, RELA, PTPN22, CARD9 and RIPK2) and clearance (ATG16L1, NCF4I and RGM) have been highlighted 8, 9, 10, 11. In the gastrointestinal tract lamina propria, the intestinal dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages (MPs) provide first‐line defence against invading microorganisms 12. Disruptions in the DCs and MPs lead to bacterial translocation across the intestinal mucosa and subsequent inflammation 13. Accumulated evidence in IBD patients has demonstrated that dysfunctional bacteria clearance ability increases bacterial invasion in mucosa biopsies 14, 15. However, more mechanisms underlying the innate immune response against microbial invasion during IBD progression remain unexplored.

Recently, Rab32 was identified as an essential player in the clearance of intracellular pathogens both in DCs and MPs 16, 17, 18. Moreover, Rab32 has been found to be frequently methylated in IBD and IBD‐related neoplasms 19, 20. In this study, we examined the role of Rab32 in a dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)‐induced colitis model. We found that Rab32 deficiency in CD11c+ cells exacerbates the progression of colitis in mice with increased neutrophil infiltration and bacterial invasion.

Materials and methods

Mice

Rab32 tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi mice were purchased from the KOMP Repository, and CD11c‐Cre (B6.Cg‐Tg(Itgax−cre)1−1Reiz/J) and Flpe mice (129S4/SvJaeSor‐Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(FLP1)Dym/J) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. CD11c‐specific Rab32‐deficient mice (CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f) were generated according to our published paper 16. Rab32 tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi mice were initially crossed with Flpe mice and then crossed with CD11c‐Cre mice to delete the second exon of Rab32. All of the mice were bred under specific‐pathogen‐free conditions. All animal experiments were conducted on protocols that were approved by the Medicine Animal Care Committee of the Army Medical University (Chongqing, China).

Bone marrow‐derived dendritic cell and macrophage culture

Bone marrow‐derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) and bone marrow‐derived macrophages (BMDMs) were generated according to published protocols 21, 22. To generate BMDCs, we cultured bone marrow isolated from tibiae and femora in 24‐well plates with 500 μL medium per well [RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS, 2 mmol·L−1 l‐glutamine, 50 μmol·L−1 2‐mercaptoethanol, 200 000 U·L−1 penicillin, 200 000 U·L−1 streptomycin and 20 ng·mL GM‐CSF (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA)]. On day 2, the medium was removed and replaced with 37 °C prewarmed fresh medium. On day 4 and day 6, half of the medium was replaced with fresh prewarmed medium. On day 7, nonadherent and loosely adherent cells were harvested. To generated BMDMs, the isolated bone marrow was cultured in a 10‐cm dish with 10 mL medium [RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS, 2 mmol·L−1 l‐glutamine, 50 μmol·L−1 2‐mercaptoethanol, 200 000 U·L−1 penicillin, 200 000 U·L−1 streptomycin and 20 ng·mL−1 M‐CSF (Peprotech)]. On day 3 and day 6, half of the medium was replaced with 37 °C prewarmed fresh medium containing 40 ng·mL−1 M‐CSF. On day 7, the adherent cells were collected. The CD11c+ cells were sorted for purified BMDCs, and CD11b+F4/80+ cells were sorted for purified BMDMs.

Western blot

For western blot experiments, 1 × 106 harvested cells were lysed on ice for 30 min in 50 μL of lysis buffer consisting of protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). After centrifugation at 10 000 g for 10 min at 4 °C, supernatants were collected. The concentrations of total protein were determined using the BCA (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) method. Denatured cellular protein lysates were separated in 4%–12% gradient NuPAGE® Novex Bis‐Tris gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were subsequently blocked in PBS containing 0.05% Tween and 5% nonfat milk (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) overnight at 4 °C and then incubated for 1 h with the primary antibody goat anti‐mouse Rab32 (1 : 1000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or rabbit anti‐mouse β‐actin or β‐tubulin (1 : 1000; Abcam). The membranes were washed with PBST 3 times for 10 min and then incubated with HRP‐conjugated anti‐goat IgG (1 : 1000; CST, Boston, MA, USA) and anti‐rabbit IgG (1 : 1000; CST) secondary antibodies. Signals were visualised by chemiluminescence using the ChemiDoc Touch Imaging system (Bio‐Rad).

Induction of colitis and evaluation of colitis severity

Mice (8‐ to 12‐week‐old) received 2.5% DSS (MW36‐50 kDa, MP Biomedicals, USA) in their drinking water for 8 days. DSS‐induced colitis severity was scored daily by evaluating disease activity index (DAI) as reported 23, 24, 25 with minor modification. The DAI score was calculated as the sum of a four‐item score, including weight loss (0 points = no change, 1 point = < 5%, 2 points = 6–10%, 3 points = 11–20% and 4 points = more than 21%), general appearance (0 points = normal, 1 point = piloerection, 2 points = lethargy and piloerection and 4 points = motionless and sickly), faeces consistency (0 points = normal, 2 points = pasty and semiformed and 4 points = liquid, sticky or unable to defecate after 5 min) and rectal bleeding (0 points = no blood, 2 points = visible blood in the rectum and 4 points = visible blood on the fur).

Histological analysis

The caecum and colon were fixed with paraformaldehyde and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE). The colonic inflammation degree was evaluated based on a previously validated scoring system 25, 26, 27 as follows: infiltration (0 points = rare infiltration, 1 point = increased number of inflammatory cells in the mucosa and 2 points = confluence of inflammatory cells extending into the submucosa), crypt damage (0 points = none, 1 point = basal 1/3 damage, 2 points = basal 2/3 damage, 3 points = only surface epithelium intact and 4 points = entire crypt and epithelium damage) and percentage of area involved (0 points = none, 1 point = 1–25%, 2 points = 26–50%, 3 points = 51–75% and 4 points = 76–100%). The colon was equally divided into four segments. The proximal colon score was determined as the average of the upper two segments, and the distal colon score was calculated as the average of the lower two segments.

Cell isolation and flow cytometry analysis

Intraepithelial (IEL) and lamina propria lymphocytes (LPL) were isolated from the colon as previously described 28. Briefly, the colon was flushed with 5 mL of PBS to remove the contents; then, it was opened longitudinally and cut into ~ 0.5‐cm pieces. To harvest IEL, the tissues were incubated twice with 5 mm EDTA containing 2% FBS at 37 °C for 20 min and the supernatant was collected. To isolate LPL, the tissues were digested twice in 0.5 mg collagenase D (Roche)/100 mL RPMI 1640 containing 5% FBS at 37 °C for 30 min and the supernatant was subsequently collected. 40%/80% Percoll (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) step‐gradient was used to enrich IEL and LPL. Mesenteric lymphoid nodes (MLNs) were mechanically dispersed through a stainless steel 200‐μm wire mesh in PBS, and the cells were washed after centrifugation for 5 min at 500 g. The cells were incubated with FITC‐conjugated CD3, PE‐conjugated CD4, PerCP‐cy5.5‐conjugated CD8a, APC‐cy7‐conjugated CD11b and APC‐conjugated Ly6G (all antibodies from eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) antibodies at 4 °C for 30 min, and DAPI was used to stain for dead cells at 4 °C for 5 min. The cells were subsequently detected on the BD FACSVerse platform and analysed with flowjov10 software (San Carlos, CA, USA).

Real‐time qPCR

RNA was extracted from the colon tissues using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse‐transcribed into cDNA with a reverse transcription kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and quantified with SYBR Green‐based real‐time qPCR with specific primers for IL1A, IL1B, IL6, IL 17, IFNγ and TNFα (synthesised at BGI, China). The inflammatory‐related genes were summarised from the published studies. All the designed primers for these genes (135 genes) were optimised and organised into the inflammatory response qPCR array primer plate (Table S1). The qPCR array reaction was performed in a 384‐well optical plate with a 2.0 μL total reaction volume by liquid handling with Echo 550 (Labycte, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

A16S ribosome DNA (rDNA) qPCR was used to quantify the bacteria of the colon, MLNs and spleen as previously described 29. Briefly, the spleen, MLN and colon were separated, and the colon was flushed with 5 mL of sterile PBS to remove the contents. DNA was extracted using a DNA isolation kit (Qiagen) and amplified using primer sets for 16S rDNA of universal bacteria. The sequences of the primers used for real‐time qPCR are shown in Table S2.

The CT value of all the qPCR products was normalised to housekeeping genes, and the quantitated relative expression levels were determined using ΔΔCT analysis. In the qPCR array analysis, the limma package in R was used to identify genes that were differentially expressed between experimental conditions 30.

Bacterial culture

The colon, MLNs and spleen were separated from DSS‐induced colitis mice on day 8. The colon was flushed with 5 mL of sterile PBS to remove the colon contents. Then, the colon tissues, MLN and spleen were homogenised in sterile PBS and plated onto BBL Brucella agar plates (containing 5% horse blood) under sterile conditions as previously described 29. The plates were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions, followed by colony‐forming unit (CFU) counting.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by using graphpad prism 6 software (Graphpad software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to calculate unpaired Student's t‐test or Log‐rank test. All P‐values < 0.05 were considered to indicate significant results and were marked with asterisk (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Results

Rab32 knockout in CD11c+ cells aggravates the development of DSS‐induced colitis

To investigate the roles of Rab32 in CD11c+ cells in DSS‐induced colitis, we generated CD11c+ cell‐specific Rab32‐deficient (CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f) mice (Fig. 1A). Deletion of Rab32 in CD11c+ cells was confirmed by PCR and western blot analysis of Rab32 in BMDCs at the genomic and protein levels (Fig. S1). DSS‐induced colitis is a classical disease model with many similarities to the clinical manifestations of colitis in human IBD patients. After orally administering 2.5% DSS in drinking water for 8 days, DSS‐induced weight loss was significantly higher in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice than in WT mice (Fig. 1B). CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice weighed 73.9 ± 3.5% of their original body weight, while WT mice weighed 85.2 ± 3.5% of their original body weight. To more comprehensively evaluate the disease progression, we monitored mice daily with a disease activity index (DAI) that includes weight loss, general appearance, diarrhoea and rectal bleeding. The weight loss in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice began on day 4, and diarrhoea with bleeding was clearly detected on day 7, while weight loss began on day 5 in the WT mice, and little bleeding was observed. The DAI score of CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice was significantly higher than that of control mice (P < 0.001, Fig. 1C). Moreover, the mortality of the CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice reached over 90% when post continuously treated with 2.5% DSS but reached only approximately 50% in the WT mice (Fig. 1D). These data demonstrate that Rab32 deficiency in CD11c+ cells results in more severe disease progression and increased mortality.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Rab32 deficiency in CD11c+ cells exacerbates the progression of DSS‐induced colitis. (A) Schematic diagram of CD11c‐Cre + Rab32 f/f mice generation. (B, C) Body weight change and disease index activity were monitored daily (n = 5–8 mice/group). Colitis was induced by the oral administration of 2.5% DSS. Mice orally administered normal distilled water were used as controls. (D) The survival rate of CD11c‐Cre + Rab32 f/f mice and WT mice treated with DSS or water (n = 10 mice/group). The survival of mice was recorded daily, and the survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier test. (E, F) Length and gross imaging of colons dissected from the CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f and WT mice administered with DSS or water. All data are shown as the mean ± SD. Significances were calculated using unpaired Student's t‐test or Log‐rank test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Consistent with the clinical score data, the colon of CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice was shorter than that of control mice (44.4 ± 3.6 mm versus 63.1 ± 4.7 mm, respectively, P < 0.001, Fig. 1E,F). Histological scores revealed a significantly greater degree of tissue injury in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice than in WT control mice after DSS treatment (Fig. 2), although no significant differences were observed between CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f and WT mice administered water (Fig. S2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Histological analysis of inflamed tissue. HE‐stained sections of the (A) caecum, (B) proximal colon and (C) distal colon from WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f colitis mice were microscopically examined at 40X and 200X, and histology scores were analysed for 6–8 mice from each group. Scale bar: 500, 100 μm. All data are shown as the means ± SD. Significances were calculated using unpaired Student's t‐test. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Increased pro‐inflammatory cytokine expression and neutrophil infiltration in the inflamed colon tissue of CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice

Cytokines, including interleukins and interferons, play a critical role in the pathogenesis of IBD and are dramatically upregulated in the DSS model 31. The inflammatory cytokines IL1A, IL1B, IL6, IL17, TNFα and IFNγ were investigated first. IL1A, IL1B and IL‐6 were significantly increased in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice (Fig. 3), while the cytokines IL17, TNFα and IFNγ showed no changes (Fig. S3). Using a homemade inflammatory response qPCR array, the expression of 135 inflammatory‐related genes, including cytokines, chemokines and chemokine receptors, and transcriptional factors was assessed (Table S1). The expression of chemokines CXCL1, CXCL2 and CSF3 was significantly increased in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice (Fig. 4A,B). However, the cytokines and transcription factors associated with the T‐cell response and differentiation, such as IL4, IL12, IL10, Granzyme A/B, STAT4, GATA3, RORC and FOXP3, showed no differences. These data suggest that the severe colonic inflammation in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice may not be caused by dysfunctional T cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Aberrant expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f colitis mice. Total RNA was extracted from the colons tissues of untreated and DSS‐treated mice on day 8. Expression of the pro‐inflammatory cytokines (A) IL1α, (B) IL1β and (C) IL6 was measured by qPCR (n = 6–8 mice/group). All data are shown as the means ± SD. Significances were calculated using unpaired Student's t‐test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Increased chemokines expression and neutrophils infiltration in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f colitis mice. (A) Total RNA was extracted from the colon tissues of untreated and DSS‐treated mice to analyse the expression of 135 mouse inflammatory‐related genes with qPCR, 3 mice in each group. (B) The most significantly expressed genes CXCL1, CXCL2 and CSF3 were verified with qPCR, 6–8 mice in each group. (C, D) The frequencies of neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+) in isolated colonic IEL, LPL and MLNs from mice in the indicated groups were determined by FACS, 5–8 mice in each group. All data are shown as the means ± SD. Significances were calculated using unpaired Student's t‐test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Intraepithelial and LPL were isolated and analysed by FACS. The frequency of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells showed no significant differences between the CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f and WT mice (Fig. S3). The expression of CD80, CD86 and MHCII also showed no differences in CD11c+ BMDCs after LPS stimulation (Fig. S4). However, the frequency of CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils was higher in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f colitis mice than in the WT colitis mice (Fig. 4C,D). No significant differences were observed between CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f and WT mice administered water (Fig. S5). The MP chemokines CXCL1/CXCL2 were reported to control the early stage of neutrophil recruitment during tissue inflammation 32, 33, 34. These data indicate that the severe tissue damage of CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f colitis mice was related to the abundant neutrophil infiltration, which were recruited by the increased expression of chemokines in the tissues.

CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice are more susceptible to bacterial invasion

Neutrophils are the critical components in the innate immune response against the invasion microbes and can be recruited by bacteria‐derived products 35, 36. During DSS administration, the epithelial layer is destroyed, and bacteria infiltrate the intestinal mucosa 29. Therefore, we assessed the bacterial infiltration in the DSS colitis mice. By quantifying the bacterial 16S rDNA with real‐time qPCR, we found that CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f and WT mice administered water showed no differences in the level of bacterial invasion. However, after DSS administration, bacterial 16S rDNA copies were significantly increased in the MLN and colons. Under anaerobic culture, the colon tissues and MLN of CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice showed more bacterial growth. No significant differences were observed in the spleen between the two groups through qPCR of 16S rDNA and the anaerobic culture (Fig. 5A,B). These data indicated that commensal bacteria could be resisted in a healthy state of CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice, but when the mucosal was damaged by DSS, the deficiency of Rab32 in CD11c+ cells causes more bacterial translocation in inflamed colon tissue and MLN.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Increased bacterial invasion in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f colitis tissue. The spleen, MLN and colon were separated from untreated and DSS‐treated mice. The colon was flushed with sterile PBS to remove the contents. (A) The translocated bacteria in inflamed tissues were assessed with 16S rDNA quantitative PCR (n = 8–10 mice/group). (B) The colon tissues, MLN and spleen were homogenised and incubated onto BBL Brucella agar plates for 48 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions, followed by CFU counting (n = 8–10 mice/group). All data are shown as the means ± SD. Significances were calculated using unpaired Student's t‐test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Discussion

Accumulating studies have highlighted the importance of innate immune responses to microbes in the pathogenesis of IBDs. Blood monocytes isolated from IBD patients showed decreased phagocytosis and killing of bacteria 37. Recent studies determined that MPs isolated from IBD patients showed decreased reactive oxygen species production 38, 39. Defects in autophagy impaired the killing of adherent‐invasive E. coli either in DCs or in MPs 11, 40. Deletion of autophagy‐related gene ATG16L1 in CD11c+ cells results in more severe DSS‐induced colitis in mice 41. In this study, we found that Rab32 deficiency in CD11c+ cells aggravates the progression of DSS‐induced colitis, with a more severe inflammation appearance, colonic tissue damages and higher mortalities. The pro‐inflammatory cytokines (IL1A, IL1B and IL‐6), neutrophils and bacterial infiltration were significantly increased in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice with colitis induced by DSS. These data suggest that the CD11c positive cells play an important role in the process of DSS‐induced colitis by defending the translocation of microbiota. Although the CD11c is a traditional surface marker to identify DCs, a subset of MPs in gastrointestinal tract express low to intermediate amounts of CD11c 42. Both types of CD11c positive cells are known to have bacterial processing capability. We do not rule out which subset of CD11c+ cells with a deletion in Rab32 contribute to the effects we observed. Future studies using deletions placed behind alternative promoters may clarify the picture.

Massive amounts of neutrophils were recruited to the colon tissues of IBD patients 43. Although the specific role of neutrophils during colitis has not been clearly delineated, some reports suggest that neutrophils are rapid responders to eliminate the translocated microbes across the intestinal epithelial layer 44. Our data support the hypothesis because Rab32 deficiency in CD11c+ cells resulted in a more severe colitis progression and increased the frequency of CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils in inflamed tissue. It has been reported that MP chemokines CXCL1/CXCL2 contribute to the recruitment of neutrophils at an early stage of tissue inflammation 45. In this study, pro‐inflammatory cytokines IL1A, IL1B, IL6, and CSF3 and chemokines CXCL1 and CXCL2 were significantly increased in CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice. It is possible that the deficiency of Rab32 in CD11c+ cells recruits more neutrophils by chemokines and growth factors to cause more serious tissue damage 46, 47.

Rab32 has been well characterised in intracellular vesicle trafficking processes involving lysosome‐related organelle biogenesis, apoptosis and autophagy 48, 49, 50. Recent studies have demonstrated the critical role of Rab32 in bacteria restriction and infectious diseases 51, 52. Genome‐wide association studies identified IL23R and Rab32 as new susceptibility genes of leprosy, a disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae 53. Rab32 and its guanine nucleotide exchange factor BLOC‐3 are essential to prevent the growth of the human‐restricted salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) in mice 17. In our previous study, Rab32‐Phb‐Phb2 complex‐associated membrane recaptures escaped Listeria to control Listeria replication in cytosol 16. Here, the deficiency of Rab32 in CD11c+ cells significantly increased the bacterial translocation in inflamed colon tissue after the mucosa was damaged by DSS. The data indicate the Rab32‐related antimicrobial pathway is involved in the progress of colitis.

In summary, the present data demonstrated that Rab32 in CD11c+ cells protects against the development of DSS‐induced colitis by preventing bacterial invasion and suggested that Rab32 might contribute to the pathogenesis of human IBD and IBD‐related colorectal carcinoma.

Author contributions

performed experiments, analysed data and drafted paper. QN analysed data. DZ performed experiments. YW designed experiments and revised the manuscript.

Accession numbers

The inflammatory‐related qPCR array was deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession number GSE115035.

Supporting information

Fig. S1. Analysis of the CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice. BMDCs and BMDMs generated from WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice. (A) PCR analysis with primers amplified from exon1 and exon 3 of Rab32 with genomic from BMDCs. (B) The expression of Rab32 protein in BMDCs generated from WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice were analysed by Western blot. (C) The expression of Rab32 protein in BMDMs of WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice were analysed by Western blot.

Click here for additional data file. (438.9KB, tif)

Fig. S2. Histology analysis of colon tissue in the WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice administered water. HE‐stained sections of the (A) caecum, (B) proximal colon and (C) distal colon from WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice were microscopically examined at 40X and 200X, and histology scores were analysed for 7–8 mice each group. Scale bar: 500, 100 μm. All data are shown as the means ± SD.

Click here for additional data file. (2.3MB, tif)

Fig. S3. The expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and frequencies of T cells in the colon tissue. (A) Total RNA was extracted from the colons tissues of untreated and DSS treat mice to analyse the expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines IL17, IFNγ and TNFα with qPCR. (B) The frequencies of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the isolated colon from mice in the indicated groups were determined by FACS (n = 3 mice/group). All data are shown as the means ± SD.

Click here for additional data file. (517.8KB, tif)

Fig. S4. The maturation of BMDCs generated from WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice after stimulated with LPS. On Day 7 in culture, BMDCs were stimulated with 1 μg·mL−1 LPS for 24 h. (A) The surface marker MHC II molecule, CD80 and CD86 were analysed by FACS. (B) Proportions of MHC IIhi, CD80+, and CD86+ BMDCs were calculated. The experiments were repeated 3 times. All data are shown as the means ± SD.

Click here for additional data file. (914.4KB, tif)

Fig. S5. The proportion of neutrophils infiltrated in the colon of the WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice administered water. The frequencies of neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+) in isolated colonic IEL, LPL and MLNs from mice in the indicated groups were determined by FACS (n = 5‐8 mice/group). All data are shown as the means ± SD.

Click here for additional data file. (633.3KB, tif)

Table S1. The primers of the inflammatory response qPCR array.

Click here for additional data file. (19.4KB, xlsx)

Table S2. Sequences of primers used for qPCR amplification.

Click here for additional data file. (9.3KB, xlsx)

 

Click here for additional data file. (15.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Liyun Zou and Zihan Zheng for their kind suggestions. This work was supported by a grant from The National Key R & D Program of China (2016YFA0502201).

References

  • 1. Baumgart DC and Sandborn WJ (2007) Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies. Lancet 369, 1641–1657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Baumgart DC and Carding SR (2007) Inflammatory bowel disease: cause and immunobiology. Lancet 369, 1627–1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, Ghali WA, Ferris M, Chernoff G, Benchimol EI, Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Barkema HW et al (2012) Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology 142, 46–54..e42; quiz e30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kaplan GG (2015) The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 12, 720–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Xavier RJ and Podolsky DK (2007) Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 448, 427–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, Duerr RH, McGovern DP, Hui KY, Lee JC, Schumm LP, Sharma Y, Anderson CA et al (2012) Host‐microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 491, 119–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Liu JZ, van Sommeren S, Huang H, Ng SC, Alberts R, Takahashi A, Ripke S, Lee JC, Jostins L, Shah T et al (2015) Association analyses identify 38 susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease and highlight shared genetic risk across populations. Nat Genet 47, 979–986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kobayashi KS, Chamaillard M, Ogura Y, Henegariu O, Inohara N, Nuñez G and Flavell RA (2005) Nod2‐dependent regulation of innate and adaptive immunity in the intestinal tract. Science 307, 731–734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lassen KG, Kuballa P, Conway KL, Patel KK, Becker CE, Peloquin JM, Villablanca EJ, Norman JM, Liu TC, Heath RJ et al (2014) Atg16L1 T300A variant decreases selective autophagy resulting in altered cytokine signaling and decreased antibacterial defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 7741–7746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Travassos LH, Carneiro LA, Ramjeet M, Hussey S, Kim YG, Magalhães JG, Yuan L, Soares F, Chea E, Le Bourhis L et al (2010) Nod1 and Nod2 direct autophagy by recruiting ATG16L1 to the plasma membrane at the site of bacterial entry. Nat Immunol 11, 55–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cooney R, Baker J, Brain O, Danis B, Pichulik T, Allan P, Ferguson DJ, Campbell BJ, Jewell D, Simmons A et al (2010) NOD2 stimulation induces autophagy in dendritic cells influencing bacterial handling and antigen presentation. Nat Med 16, 90–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Saleh M and Trinchieri G (2011) Innate immune mechanisms of colitis and colitis‐associated colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Immunol 11, 9–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kamada N, Seo SU, Chen GY and Núñez G (2013) Role of the gut microbiota in immunity and inflammatory disease. Nat Rev Immunol 13, 321–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Darfeuille‐Michaud A (2002) Adherent‐invasive Escherichia coli: a putative new E. coli pathotype associated with Crohn's disease. Int J Med Microbiol 292, 185–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Darfeuille‐Michaud A, Boudeau J, Bulois P, Neut C, Glasser AL, Barnich N, Bringer MA, Swidsinski A, Beaugerie L and Colombel JF (2004) High prevalence of adherent‐invasive Escherichia coli associated with ileal mucosa in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 127, 412–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Li Y, Wang Y, Zou L, Tang X, Yang Y, Ma L, Jia Q, Ni Q, Liu S, Tang L et al (2016) Analysis of the Rab GTPase Interactome in Dendritic Cells Reveals Anti‐microbial Functions of the Rab32 Complex in Bacterial Containment. Immunity 44, 422–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Spano S and Galan JE (2012) A Rab32‐dependent pathway contributes to Salmonella typhi host restriction. Science 338, 960–963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Spano S, Gao X, Hannemann S, Lara‐Tejero M and Galán JE (2016) A Bacterial Pathogen Targets a Host Rab‐Family GTPase Defense Pathway with a GAP. Cell Host Microbe 19, 216–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Schulmann K, Mori Y, Croog V, Yin J, Olaru A, Sterian A, Sato F, Wang S, Xu Y, Deacu E et al (2005) Molecular phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease‐associated neoplasms with microsatellite instability. Gastroenterology 129, 74–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Shibata D, Mori Y, Cai K, Zhang L, Yin J, Elahi A, Hamelin R, Wong YF, Lo WK, Chung TK et al (2006) RAB32 hypermethylation and microsatellite instability in gastric and endometrial adenocarcinomas. Int J Cancer 119, 801–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Inaba K, Inaba M, Romani N, Aya H, Deguchi M, Ikehara S, Muramatsu S and Steinman RM (1992) Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony‐stimulating factor. J Exp Med 176, 1693–1702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ying W, Cheruku PS, Bazer FW, Safe SH and Zhou B (2013) Investigation of macrophage polarization using bone marrow derived macrophages. J Vis Exp, e50323. 10.3791/50323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Taylor BC, Zaph C, Troy AE, Du Y, Guild KJ, Comeau MR and Artis D (2009) TSLP regulates intestinal immunity and inflammation in mouse models of helminth infection and colitis. J Exp Med 206, 655–667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Liu T, Ren J, Wang W, Wei XW, Shen GB, Liu YT, Luo M, Xu GC, Shao B, Deng SY et al (2015) Treatment of dextran sodium sulfate‐induced experimental colitis by adoptive transfer of peritoneal cells. Sci Rep 5, 16760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sidhu M, Cotoner CA, Guleng B, Arihiro S, Chang S, Duncan KW, Ajami AM, Chau M and Reinecker HC (2011) Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of intestinal inflammation. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17, 2416–2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Khalil PN, Weiler V, Nelson PJ, Khalil MN, Moosmann S, Mutschler WE, Siebeck M and Huss R (2007) Nonmyeloablative stem cell therapy enhances microcirculation and tissue regeneration in murine inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 132, 944–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Steidler L, Hans W, Schotte L, Neirynck S, Obermeier F, Falk W, Fiers W and Remaut E (2000) Treatment of murine colitis by Lactococcus lactis secreting interleukin‐10. Science 289, 1352–1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Weigmann B, Tubbe I, Seidel D, Nicolaev A, Becker C and Neurath MF (2007) Isolation and subsequent analysis of murine lamina propria mononuclear cells from colonic tissue. Nat Protoc 2, 2307–2311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Dupaul‐Chicoine J, Yeretssian G, Doiron K, Bergstrom KS, McIntire CR, LeBlanc PM, Meunier C, Turbide C, Gros P, Beauchemin N et al (2010) Control of intestinal homeostasis, colitis, and colitis‐associated colorectal cancer by the inflammatory caspases. Immunity 32, 367–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Phipson B, Lee S, Majewski IJ, Alexander WS and Smyth GK (2016) Robust hyperparameter estimation protects against hypervariable genes and improves power to detect differential expression. Ann Appl Stat 10, 946–963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Neurath MF (2014) Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol 14, 329–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Borregaard N (2010) Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity 33, 657–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Bardoel BW, Kenny EF, Sollberger G and Zychlinsky A (2014) The balancing act of neutrophils. Cell Host Microbe 15, 526–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lin Z, Li JW, Wang Y, Chen T, Ren N, Yang L, Xu W, He H, Jiang Y, Chen X et al (2016) Abnormal miRNA‐30e Expression is Associated with Breast Cancer Progression. Clin Lab 62, 121–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Khan KJ, Ullman TA, Ford AC, Abreu MT, Abadir A, Marshall JK, Talley NJ and Moayyedi P (2011) Antibiotic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 106, 661–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Pineton de Chambrun GP, Torres J, Darfeuille‐Michaud A, Darfeuille‐Michaud A and Colombel JF (2012) The role of anti(myco)bacterial interventions in the management of IBD: is there evidence at all?. Dig Dis 30, 358–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Caradonna L, Amati L, Lella P, Jirillo E and Caccavo D (2000) Phagocytosis, killing, lymphocyte‐mediated antibacterial activity, serum autoantibodies, and plasma endotoxins in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 95, 1495–1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Smith AM, Rahman FZ, Hayee B, Graham SJ, Marks DJ, Sewell GW, Palmer CD, Wilde J, Foxwell BM, Gloger IS et al (2009) Disordered macrophage cytokine secretion underlies impaired acute inflammation and bacterial clearance in Crohn's disease. J Exp Med 206, 1883–1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Palmer CD, Rahman FZ, Sewell GW, Ahmed A, Ashcroft M, Bloom SL, Segal AW and Smith AM (2009) Diminished macrophage apoptosis and reactive oxygen species generation after phorbol ester stimulation in Crohn's disease. PLoS ONE 4, e7787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lapaquette P, Bringer MA and Darfeuille‐Michaud A (2012) Defects in autophagy favour adherent‐invasive Escherichia coli persistence within macrophages leading to increased pro‐inflammatory response. Cell Microbiol 14, 791–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhang H, Zheng L, Chen J, Fukata M, Ichikawa R, Shih DQ and Zhang X (2017) The protection role of Atg16 l1 in CD11c(+)dendritic cells in murine colitis. Immunobiology 222, 831–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Cerovic V, Bain CC, Mowat AM and Milling SW (2014) Intestinal macrophages and dendritic cells: what's the difference? Trends Immunol 35, 270–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kvedaraite E, Lourda M, Ideström M, Chen P, Olsson‐Åkefeldt S, Forkel M, Gavhed D, Lindforss U, Mjösberg J and Henter JI (2016) Tissue‐infiltrating neutrophils represent the main source of IL‐23 in the colon of patients with IBD. Gut 65, 1632–1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Fournier BM and Parkos CA (2012) The role of neutrophils during intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol 5, 354–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. De Filippo K, Dudeck A, Hasenberg M, Nye E, van Rooijen N, Hartmann K, Gunzer M, Roers A and Hogg N (2013) Mast cell and macrophage chemokines CXCL1/CXCL2 control the early stage of neutrophil recruitment during tissue inflammation. Blood 121, 4930–4937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kolaczkowska E and Kubes P (2013) Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 13, 159–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Costantini C and Jaillon S (2011) Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 11, 519–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hirota Y and Tanaka Y (2009) A small GTPase, human Rab32, is required for the formation of autophagic vacuoles under basal conditions. Cell Mol Life Sci 66, 2913–2932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Bui M, Gilady SY, Fitzsimmons RE, Benson MD, Lynes EM, Gesson K, Alto NM, Strack S, Scott JD and Simmen T (2010) Rab32 modulates apoptosis onset and mitochondria‐associated membrane (MAM) properties. J Biol Chem 285, 31590–31602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bultema JJ, Ambrosio AL, Burek CL and Di Pietro SM (2012) BLOC‐2, AP‐3, and AP‐1 proteins function in concert with Rab38 and Rab32 proteins to mediate protein trafficking to lysosome‐related organelles. J Biol Chem 287, 19550–19563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Solano‐Collado V, Rofe A and Spano S (2016) Rab32 restriction of intracellular bacterial pathogens. Small GTPases 9, 216–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Prashar A, Schnettger L, Bernard EM and Gutierrez MG (2017) Rab GTPases in Immunity and Inflammation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7, 435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhang F, Liu H, Chen S, Low H, Sun L, Cui Y, Chu T, Li Y, Fu X, Yu Y et al (2011) Identification of two new loci at IL23R and RAB32 that influence susceptibility to leprosy. Nat Genet 43, 1247–1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1. Analysis of the CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice. BMDCs and BMDMs generated from WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice. (A) PCR analysis with primers amplified from exon1 and exon 3 of Rab32 with genomic from BMDCs. (B) The expression of Rab32 protein in BMDCs generated from WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice were analysed by Western blot. (C) The expression of Rab32 protein in BMDMs of WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice were analysed by Western blot.

Click here for additional data file. (438.9KB, tif)

Fig. S2. Histology analysis of colon tissue in the WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice administered water. HE‐stained sections of the (A) caecum, (B) proximal colon and (C) distal colon from WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice were microscopically examined at 40X and 200X, and histology scores were analysed for 7–8 mice each group. Scale bar: 500, 100 μm. All data are shown as the means ± SD.

Click here for additional data file. (2.3MB, tif)

Fig. S3. The expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and frequencies of T cells in the colon tissue. (A) Total RNA was extracted from the colons tissues of untreated and DSS treat mice to analyse the expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines IL17, IFNγ and TNFα with qPCR. (B) The frequencies of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the isolated colon from mice in the indicated groups were determined by FACS (n = 3 mice/group). All data are shown as the means ± SD.

Click here for additional data file. (517.8KB, tif)

Fig. S4. The maturation of BMDCs generated from WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice after stimulated with LPS. On Day 7 in culture, BMDCs were stimulated with 1 μg·mL−1 LPS for 24 h. (A) The surface marker MHC II molecule, CD80 and CD86 were analysed by FACS. (B) Proportions of MHC IIhi, CD80+, and CD86+ BMDCs were calculated. The experiments were repeated 3 times. All data are shown as the means ± SD.

Click here for additional data file. (914.4KB, tif)

Fig. S5. The proportion of neutrophils infiltrated in the colon of the WT and CD11c‐Cre+Rab32f/f mice administered water. The frequencies of neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+) in isolated colonic IEL, LPL and MLNs from mice in the indicated groups were determined by FACS (n = 5‐8 mice/group). All data are shown as the means ± SD.

Click here for additional data file. (633.3KB, tif)

Table S1. The primers of the inflammatory response qPCR array.

Click here for additional data file. (19.4KB, xlsx)

Table S2. Sequences of primers used for qPCR amplification.

Click here for additional data file. (9.3KB, xlsx)

 

Click here for additional data file. (15.2KB, docx)

Articles from FEBS Open Bio are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES