Skip to main content
Food Science and Biotechnology logoLink to Food Science and Biotechnology
. 2018 Apr 2;27(5):1257–1264. doi: 10.1007/s10068-018-0363-8

Physicochemical characteristics and anti-oxidant activities of farm-cultivated and mountain-cultivated ginseng seeds

Yu Jeong Kim 1, Yongcheol Lee 1, Jaecheol Kim 1, Sun Young Park 1, Kiuk Lee 1, Keum Taek Hwang 1,
PMCID: PMC6170274  PMID: 30319833

Abstract

Physicochemical characteristics and anti-oxidant capacities of seeds from two farm-cultivated and one mountain-cultivated ginsengs (Panax ginseng Meyer) (MG) were determined. The seeds had 17.9–22.1% (dry basis) crude lipids, 11.5–15.2% crude proteins, and 1.4–1.7% ash. Oleic acid (77.9–78.5%) was the predominant fatty acid in the seed oils, followed by linoleic acid (16.6–17.4%). The highest Hunter b value, carotenoids, (β + γ)-tocotrienol, and δ-tocotrienol, and the lowest α-tocotrienol were observed in the seed oils from MG. Squalene was also the most abundant in the MG seed oils. β-Sitosterol was the major phytosterol in the seed oils with MG the highest. Defatted seed meal extracts from MG possessed the most total phenolics and flavonoids, and the highest DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities. These results suggest that MG seeds may be a novel source of functional foods.

Keywords: Anti-oxidant, Farm-cultivated ginseng, Ginseng seed, Mountain-cultivated ginseng, Physicochemical characteristics

Introduction

Ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) has been regarded as a medicinal plant due to its physiological activities such as anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, anti-aging, and anti-cancer activities [1]. Koreans mainly consume two types of ginseng, farm-cultivated (FG) and mountain-cultivated ginsengs (MG). FG is cultivated for 5–6 years before harvest in a farm, where the sunlight is partially blocked. MG grows by itself in a mountain area after being sown or transplanted as planned. It is harvested after 10–20 years or more [1, 2].

There have been several studies on effect of the different cultivations on chemical characteristics of ginseng seeds, seed oils, leaves, and roots [26]. It has been reported that roots and leaves of MG exhibit higher anti-cancer and anti-oxidant properties than those of FG [13]. However, studies on seed oils of FG and MG are still limited.

Ginseng seeds contain 15.0–26.6% (w/w, dry basis) oil [6, 7]. Ginseng seed oil contains more than 90% (w/w) unsaturated fatty acids, with oleic (61.2–87.7%) and linoleic acids (8.9–18.8%) as the major fatty acids [4, 68]. It also possesses fat-soluble vitamins, squalene, and phytosterols. These substances affect quality of an oil and have been known to have various health benefits [7, 8]. Ginseng seed oil has been considered to be a potential specialty source of functional foods and cosmetics [68].

Defatted seed meals have been mostly discarded or used as low-value by-products after oil extraction [9]. A considerable amount of phenolic compounds, well-known as anti-oxidants, are still present in defatted seed meals [10]. Studies have increasingly paid attention to added value of ginseng by-products with growing interest in evaluation of defatted seed meals [911]. However, anti-oxidant properties and potential anti-oxidant substances of defatted seed meals of FG and MG have been little studied. The aims of this study were to evaluate physicochemical properties of seed oils from FG and MG and to evaluate anti-oxidant capacities and amounts of potential anti-oxidant substances in the defatted seed meal (DSM) extracts from the FG and MG.

Materials and methods

Materials and reagents

Seeds from FG (4 years grown, FGS1; and 5–6 years grown, FGS2) and MG (7–13 years grown, MGS) harvested in August, 2016 in Hongcheon (Korea) and Pyeongchang (Korea), respectively, were purchased. The seeds were dried in a freeze dryer (Clean Vac12, Hanil Scientific Inc., Gimpo, Korea) for 5 days, which was then stored at − 70 °C until used.

β-Carotene, α-, γ-, and δ-tocopherols, 5α-cholestane, gallic acid, quercetin, standard mixture of 37 fatty acid methyl esters, boron trifluoride (BF3)-methanol, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate, DPPH, 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), potassium persulfate, and tert-butyl methyl ether were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). α-, γ-, and δ-Tocotrienol kits and sodium sulfate were obtained from Chromadex (Irvine, CA, USA) and Yakuri Pure Chemicals Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan), respectively. Squalene and stigmasterol were obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). β-Sitosterol and campesterol were obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Acetonitrile and methanol were obtained from Avantor Performance Materials (Center Valley, PA, USA). The other chemicals used in the study were of analytical grade and obtained from Samchun Pure Chemical Co., Ltd. (Pyeongtaek, Korea).

Preparation of samples

The dried seeds were powdered using a food processor (SMX-G770, Shinil Industrial Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) for 3 min, which was then passed through an 18 mesh (1 mm) testing sieve. The ground seed (100 g) was mixed with 500 mL n-hexane at room temperature for 2 h, followed by filtering through a Whatman No. 2 filter paper (Whatman International Ltd., Maidstone, England). Solvent was removed from the filtrate using a rotary evaporator (Eyela N-1000, Tokyo Rikakikai, Tokyo, Japan) at 50 °C. The extracted oils were stored at − 70 °C after flushing with nitrogen until further analysis. The oils from the FGS1, FGS2, and MGS were designated as FGSO1, FGSO2, and MGSO, respectively. Yield of the ginseng seed oil was calculated as follows:

Yield%=W1/W0×100,

where W0 is weight of used seed powder (g, dry basis) and W1 is weight of extracted oil (g).

DSM were left in a hood for 2 days for removal of remaining solvent. The DSM (8 g) was twice refluxed with 160 mL 70% (v/v) ethanol for 2 h at 85 °C. The solvent mixture was filtered through a Whatman No. 2 filter paper. Solvent was removed from the filtrate using the rotary evaporator. The residue was dried in the freeze dryer for 5 days, which was then stored at − 70 °C until analyzed. The DSM extracts from the FGS1, FGS2, and MGS were designated as FGME1, FGME2, and MGME, respectively. Yield of the ginseng DSM extract was calculated as follows:

Yield%=W1/W0×100,

where W0 is weight of used DSM (g, dry basis) and W1 is weight of freeze-dried extract (g).

Analysis of proximate composition of ginseng seeds

Crude lipids, crude proteins, and ash in the dried seeds were performed according to AOAC Official Method [12] 963.15, 970.22, and 972.15, respectively.

Analysis of fatty acid compositions of ginseng seed oils

The seed oils were converted to methyl esters using BF3-methanol by AOCS Official Method [13] Ce 2-66. The fatty acid methyl esters were separated by an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a DB-23 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). Split ratio was 1:50. Injector and detector temperatures were set at 240 and 280 °C, respectively. Flow rate of carrier gas, helium, was 1.3 mL/min. Oven was programmed at 50 °C held for 2 min, from 50 to 175 °C at 25 °C/min, to 230 °C at 4 °C/min held for 5 min, and to 250 °C at 25 °C/min held for 3 min [8]. Peaks of fatty acid methyl esters were identified by matching with those of corresponding standards.

Analysis of color of ginseng seed oils

Color of the oils was measured using a colorimeter (CM-5, Konica Minolta Co., Tokyo, Japan). Color values are given as lightness (L), redness (a), and yellowness (b).

Analysis of carotenoids in ginseng seed oils

Carotenoid contents of the oils were evaluated using AOAC Official Method [12] 958.05 with some modification. Absorbance was determined at 440 nm using a microplate reader (SpectraMax 190, Molecular devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and converted to carotenoid content using a calibration curve of β-carotene solutions in n-hexane.

Analysis of tocols (tocopherols and tocotrienols) in ginseng seed oils

Each oil (60 mg) was mixed with 1 mL 2-propanol, which was then filtered through a 0.2 μm hydrophobic syringe filter (Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) before analyzing tocols [14]. Tocols were identified by an HPLC (Agilent 1260 infinity, Agilent Technologies) equipped with a single quadrupole mass spectrometer (6130, Agilent Technologies) with an APCI interface. Five microliters of each sample were injected to an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (5 µm, 4.6 mm × 150 mm, Agilent Technologies) at 40 °C. Mobile phases were deionized water (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B) with a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. Gradient elution was programmed at 95% B to 38 min, with linear gradient from 95 to 100% B from 38 min to 43 min, at 95% B from 43 min to 43.5 min, and reconditioning for 1.5 min. The mass spectroscopy was operated in positive mode. Full mass scan was m/z 100–620 (0.6 s/scan) and target ions generated by tocols were: (M + H)+: m/z 431 (α-tocopherol), 417 ((β + γ)-tocopherol), 403 (δ-tocopherol), 425 (α-tocotrienol), 411 ((β + γ)-tocotrienol), and 397 (δ-tocotrienol). The following mass parameters were applied: vaporizer temperature: 325 °C; capillary voltage: 4000 V; corona current: 4 µA; nebulizing pressure (N2): 30 psi; gas temperature (N2): 350 °C; gas flow (N2): 8 L/min; and fragmentor: 150 V. Tocols were quantified by an HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Thermo Scientific Dionex, Waltham, MA, USA). Twenty microliters of each sample were injected to a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (5 µm, 4.6 mm × 150 mm, Agilent Technologies). Mobile phase was methanol and acetonitrile (1:1, v/v) and flow rate was 1.5 mL/min. A fluorescence detector was set at excitation and emission wavelengths of 295 and 325 nm, respectively [14]. Quantification of tocols was conducted comparing those of corresponding standards.

Preparation of unsaponifiable fraction of ginseng seed oils

The seed oils were saponified using a previously described method [7] with some modification before analysis of squalene and phytosterols. Each oil (1 g) was mixed with 1 mL 0.02% (w/v) 5α-cholestane (internal standard) in tert-butyl methyl ether. The mixture was saponified with 20 mL 1 M methanolic KOH solution by stirring overnight, to which 40 mL water was then added. This solution was transferred to a separatory funnel with 30 mL tert-butyl methyl ether to collect the upper layer, which was repeated 3 times. The collected upper layer was washed with 40 mL water. The washing process was repeated until the wash water appeared pink no longer after dripping 1% (w/v) phenolphthalein in 95% (v/v) ethanol. The tert-butyl methyl ether extract was passed through sodium sulfate for removal of water. The solvents were eliminated using a speed vacuum concentrator (Scanvac, LaboGene, Lynge, Denmark) at 2000 rpm and 30 °C for 4 h. The residue was mixed with 2 mL n-hexane, which was then filtered through a 0.2 μm hydrophobic syringe filter.

Analysis of squalene and phytosterols in ginseng seed oils

Squalene and phytosterols in the oils were identified by a QP2010 Plus gas chromatograph (Shimazdu Co., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a mass selective detector and a DB-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm, J&W Scientific). Injection volume was 1 μL with a split ratio of 1:10. Transfer line from GC to mass selective detector was set at 300 °C. Injector and detector temperatures were set at 280 and 300 °C, respectively. The mass spectrometer was performed at electron impact ionization mode with an electron energy of 70 eV. Mass range was 50–600 amu. Flow rate of carrier gas, helium, was 1 mL/min. Oven was programmed at 100 °C held for 3 min, from 100 to 275 °C at 15 °C/min held for 25 min, and from 275 to 280 °C at 3 °C/min held for 3 min [7]. Mass peaks of squalene and phytosterols were identified by comparing mass spectrum and similarity indices of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) library. Squalene and phytosterols were quantified by the Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with the FID and DB-5 column. Split ratio was 1:15 and flow rate was 1.3 mL/min. Injection volume, carrier gas, temperatures of injector, detector, and column were as described for the GC–MS analysis. Quantification of squalene and phytosterols was conducted comparing those of corresponding standards.

Determination of total phenolics and flavonoids in ginseng DSM extracts

The freeze-dried DSM extracts (10 mg) were diluted with 1 mL 70% (v/v) ethanol before analysis of total phenolics and flavonoids. Total phenolics were evaluated according to the method described by Singleton et al. [15]. Water (1.58 mL) and 100 μL Folin–Ciocalteu reagent were added to 20 μL of the diluted extract. After 5 min, 300 μL 20% (w/v) sodium carbonate was added to the mixture, which was then incubated at 40 °C for 30 min. Absorbance was determined at 765 nm. Total phenolics were expressed as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) calibrated. Total flavonoids were measured according to the method described by Jiang et al. [16]. The diluted extract (1 mL) was dissolved in water to make its final volume 2 mL, which was then reacted with 1 mL 1% (w/v) 2-aminoethyl-diphenylborate in methanol. Absorbance was determined at 404 nm. Total flavonoids were expressed as quercetin equivalent (QE) calibrated.

Anti-oxidant activities of ginseng DSM extracts

The freeze-dried DSM extracts were diluted with 70% (v/v) ethanol to proper concentrations before analyzing anti-oxidant activities. DPPH free radical scavenging activities were determined by the method of Brand-Williams et al. [17]. One hundred microliters of 0.2 mM DPPH in 70% (v/v) ethanol were added to 50 μL of the diluted sample. This mixture was kept in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance was determined at 517 nm. ABTS free radical scavenging activities were measured according to the method suggested by Re et al. [18]. ABTS solution was prepared by mixing 7 mM ABTS and 2.45 mM potassium persulfate at ratio of 1:1 (v/v) and kept overnight in the dark at room temperature before use. The ABTS solution was diluted with 70% (v/v) ethanol to have absorbance of less than 0.70 at 734 nm. The diluted ABTS solution (180 μL) was added to 20 μL of the diluted sample. This mixture was kept at room temperature for 5 min. Absorbance was determined at 734 nm. DPPH or ABTS free radical scavenging activity was calculated as follows:

DPPHorABTSfreeradicalscavengingactivity%=1-As/A0×100,

where A0 is absorbance of control and As is absorbance of the sample. DPPH IC50 or ABTS IC50 value is the concentration of the sample (expressed on the weight basis of the freeze-dried extracts) required to scavenge 50% of the DPPH or ABTS free radical.

Statistical analysis

All the data except for color values of the oils were obtained in triplicate and expressed as means ± standard deviations. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted using SPSS 23 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). If significant in ANOVA, differences among the samples were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).

Results and discussion

Proximate composition of ginseng seeds

Crude lipids, crude proteins, and ash in the tested ginseng seeds were 17.9–22.1% (w/w, dry basis), 11.5–15.2%, and 1.4–1.7%, respectively (Table 1). A similar result was also reported by Kim et al. [4], who found 3- and 4-year-old FG seeds harvested in Geumsan (Korea) contained 19.1–19.3% (dry basis) crude lipids, 13.7–14.3% crude proteins, and 2.2–8.7% ash. The lipids, proteins, and ash in the MGS and FGS2 were significantly higher than those in the FGS1 (p < 0.05). It was reported that 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old FG roots harvested in Gwacheon (Korea) had more crude fat, crude protein, and ash as their cultivation duration was longer [5].

Table 1.

Proximate composition of ginseng seeds (Unit: %, w/w, dry basis)

FGS11) FGS22) MGS3)
Crude lipid 17.9 ± 0.84)b5) 21.4 ± 0.2a 22.1 ± 0.4a
Crude protein 11.5 ± 0.6b 14.5 ± 0.5a 15.2 ± 0.5a
Crude ash 1.4 ± 0.1b 1.7 ± 0.1a 1.5 ± 0.1ab

1)FGS1, farm-cultivated ginseng seeds (4 years grown)

2)FGS2, farm-cultivated ginseng seeds (5–6 years grown)

3)MGS, mountain-cultivated ginseng seeds (7–13 years grown)

4)Means ± standard deviations of three determinations

5)Different small letters indicate significant differences among the samples (p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test)

Yields of oils and DSM extracts from ginseng seeds

Oils obtained from the ginseng seeds were 16.3–19.0% (w/w, dry basis) with no significant difference among them (p > 0.05) (Table 2). Other researchers reported that they obtained 15.0–26.6% (dry basis) oils from ginseng seeds [6, 7]. DSM extracts from the ginseng seeds were 6.0–7.4% (w/w, dry basis) with the MGME the lowest (Table 6).

Table 2.

Yields and fatty acid compositions of ginseng seed oils

FGSO11) FGSO22) MGSO3)
Yields (%, w/w) 16.3 ± 1.97) 18.1 ± 0.5 19.0 ± 1.2
Fatty acid (%, w/w)
 C16:0 (palmitic acid) 1.9 ± 0.01a8) 1.9 ± 0.00a 1.9 ± 0.00b
 C16:1 (palmitoleic acid) 0.3 ± 0.00a 0.3 ± 0.00a 0.2 ± 0.00b
 C18:1 (oleic acid) 78.0 ± 0.03b 78.5 ± 0.12a 77.9 ± 0.01b
 C18:2 (linoleic acid) 16.8 ± 0.26b 16.6 ± 0.03b 17.4 ± 0.08a
 C18:3 (γ-linolenic acid) 0.2 ± 0.00b 0.2 ± 0.00a 0.1 ± 0.00c
 C18:3 (α-linolenic acid) 0.1 ± 0.00b 0.1 ± 0.00b 0.1 ± 0.00a
 C20:0 (arachidic acid) 0.03 ± 0.00ab 0.03 ± 0.00b 0.03 ± 0.00a
 C20:1 (eicosenoic acid) 0.1 ± 0.00a 0.1 ± 0.00b 0.1 ± 0.00c
 SFA4) 2.0 ± 0.01a 2.0 ± 0.00b 1.9 ± 0.00c
 MUFA5) 78.3 ± 0.03b 78.9 ± 0.12a 78.2 ± 0.02c
 PUFA6) 17.0 ± 0.26b 16.8 ± 0.03b 17.7 ± 0.08a

1)FGSO1, farm-cultivated ginseng seed (4 years grown) oil

2)FGSO2, farm-cultivated ginseng seed (5–6 years grown) oil

3)MGSO, mountain-cultivated ginseng seed (7–13 years grown) oil

4)SFA, saturated fatty acids

5)MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids

6)PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids

7)Means ± standard deviations of three determinations

8)Different small letters indicate significant differences among the samples (p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test)

Table 6.

Yields, anti-oxidant contents, and anti-oxidant activities of defatted ginseng seed meal extracts

FGME11) FGME22) MGME3)
Yields (%, w/w) 7.4 ± 0.59a10 7.0 ± 0.4a 6.0 ± 0.3b
Total phenolics (mg GAE4)/g)8) 19.8 ± 1.0b 20.3 ± 0.4b 28.1 ± 1.2a
Total flavonoids (mg QE5)/g) 3.8 ± 0.3b 3.9 ± 0.3b 5.5 ± 0.3a
DPPH IC6)50 (mg/mL) 1.2 ± 0.2a 1.0 ± 0.1ab 0.8 ± 0.2b
ABTS IC7)50 (mg/mL) 1.7 ± 0.03a 1.5 ± 0.1b 1.0 ± 0.1c

1)FGME1, defatted farm-cultivated ginseng seed (4 years grown) meal extract

2)FGME2, defatted farm-cultivated ginseng seed (5–6 years grown) meal extract

3)MGME, defatted mountain-cultivated ginseng seed (7–13 years grown) meal extract

4)GAE, gallic acid equivalent

5)QE, quercetin equivalent

6)DPPH IC50, concentration of the extract required to scavenge 50% of DPPH radical

7)ABTS IC50, concentration of the extract required to scavenge 50% of ABTS radical

8)Based on the freeze-dried extract

9)Means ± standard deviations of three determinations

10)Different small letters indicate significant differences among the samples (p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test)

Fatty acid compositions of ginseng seed oils

All the tested oils had more than 95% (w/w) unsaturated fatty acids (Table 2). Oleic acid (77.9–78.5%) was the predominant fatty acid in the tested oils, followed by linoleic acid (16.6–17.4%). This fatty acid composition was similar to that of ginseng seed oils reported previously [4, 6, 8].

Color and carotenoid contents of ginseng seed oils

The MGSO exhibited significantly the highest Hunter b value, indicating that it is more yellow than the other oils (p < 0.05) (Table 3). Carotenoids are present in seeds as natural pigments which contribute to yellow color [19]. The MGSO had significantly more carotenoids than the others (p < 0.05) (Table 3). The carotenoid contents in the FGSO1 and FGSO2 were not significantly different (p > 0.05). It was reported that sweet potatoes [20] and olive oils [21] with more carotenoid contents had higher Hunter b or CIE b* values. A previous study also reported that a significantly lower Hunter b value of used sunflower oil may be due to reduction of carotenoids [22]. Therefore, the carotenoid content may affect the degree of yellowness of the ginseng seed oils.

Table 3.

Color values and carotenoid contents of ginseng seed oils

FGSO11) FGSO22) MGSO3)
L 97.8 ± 1.14)a5) 98.6 ± 0.1a 95.7 ± 0.2b
a − 1.3 ± 0.1b − 1.0 ± 0.0a − 2.4 ± 0.0c
b 11.1 ± 0.8b 10.5 ± 0.4b 27.3 ± 0.3a
Carotenoids (μg β-carotene equivalent/g oil) 0.9 ± 0.16)b 0.7 ± 0.1b 4.3 ± 1.0a

1)FGSO1, farm-cultivated ginseng seed (4 years grown) oil

2)FGSO2, farm-cultivated ginseng seed (5–6 years grown) oil

3)MGSO, mountain-cultivated ginseng seed (7–13 years grown) oil

4)Means ± standard deviations of two determinations

5)Different small letters indicate significant differences among the samples (p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test)

6)Means ± standard deviations of three determinations

Tocols in ginseng seed oils

α-, (β + γ)-, and δ-Tocotrienols in the tested ginseng seed oils were 20.8–24.9, 0.4–3.7, and 0.02–0.23 mg/100 g oil, respectively (Table 4). However, tocopherols were not detected in the tested oils. Kim et al. [8] reported that only γ-tocopherol was found in seed oils from 4-year-old FG. The MGSO contained significantly the highest (β + γ)- and δ-tocotrienols and the lowest α-tocotrienol among the tested oils (p < 0.05). Tocotrienol contents in the FGSO1 and FGSO2 were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Previous studies reported that tocotrienol contents in plants may be affected by environment, duration, and system (utilization of fertilizer and pesticide) of cultivation [2325].

Table 4.

Tocols in ginseng seed oils (Unit: mg/100 g oil)

FGSO11) FGSO22) MGSO3)
α-Tocotrienol 24.4 ± 0.44)a5) 24.9 ± 0.5a 20.8 ± 0.3b
(β + γ)-Tocotrienol 0.4 ± 0.01b 0.4 ± 0.01b 3.7 ± 0.06a
δ-Tocotrienol 0.04 ± 0.00b 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.23 ± 0.01a
Tocotrienols 24.8 ± 0.4 25.4 ± 0.5 24.7 ± 0.4
Tocopherols ND6) ND ND

1)FGSO1, farm-cultivated ginseng seed (4 years grown) oil

2)FGSO2, farm-cultivated ginseng seed (5–6 years grown) oil

3)MGSO, mountain-cultivated ginseng seed (7–13 years grown) oil

4)Means ± standard deviations of three determinations

5)Different small letters indicate significant differences among the samples (p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test)

6)ND, not detected

Squalene and phytosterols in ginseng seed oils

Squalene in the tested ginseng seed oils was 299–405 mg/100 g oil (Table 5). Commercial squalene has been mostly obtained from shark liver oil [26]. However, vegetable oils have been considered to be another source of squalene since shark fishery has declined [7]. Olive oil, pumpkin seed oil, and amaranth oil have been suggested to be useful sources of squalene with squalene contents of 0.3–0.7, 0.09, and 0.1–0.4% (w/w), respectively [27, 28]. Seed oil from farm-cultivated American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium L.) harvested in British Columbia (Canada) has been also regarded as a useful source of squalene since it contains a large amount of squalene (0.5–0.6%) [7]. Squalene accounted for 0.3–0.4% of the tested oils with significantly the most abundant in the MGSO (p < 0.05). Thus, ginseng seed oil, especially MGSO, may be suggested to be a potential desirable source of squalene. Campesterol, stigmasterol, and β-sitosterol in the tested ginseng seed oils were 5.9–8.1, 32.9–46.6, and 48.1–83.6 mg/100 g oil, respectively (Table 5). Seed oil from farm-cultivated American ginseng harvested in British Columbia (Canada) contained 8.5–12.4 mg campesterol/100 g oil, 93.2–113.2 mg stigmasterol/100 g oil, and 116.6–186.4 mg β-sitosterol/100 g oil [7]. A possible reason for the differences of phytosterol contents was reported to be species of plants [2931]. The differences in phytosterol contents between the tested oils in the present study and farm-cultivated American ginseng seed oil might be influenced by their cultivation origins. Phytosterols were significantly more in the MGSO and FGSO1 than those in the FGSO2 (p < 0.05). β-Sitosterol was the most prevalent phytosterol in the tested oils.

Table 5.

Squalene and phytosterols in ginseng seed oils (Unit: mg/100 g oil)

FGSO11) FGSO22) MGSO3)
Squalene 328 ± 17.04)b5) 299 ± 22.5b 405 ± 19.0a
Campesterol 8.1 ± 0.4a 5.9 ± 0.3b 7.5 ± 0.2a
Stigmasterol 39.0 ± 2.8b 32.9 ± 4.0c 46.6 ± 1.6a
β-Sitosterol 83.5 ± 5.3a 48.1 ± 2.0b 83.6 ± 2.4a

1)FGSO1, farm-cultivated ginseng seed (4 years grown) oil

2)FGSO2, farm-cultivated ginseng seed (5–6 years grown) oil

3)MGSO, mountain-cultivated ginseng seed (7–13 years grown) oil

4)Means ± standard deviations of three determinations

5)Different small letters indicate significant differences among the samples (p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test)

Total phenolics, flavonoids, and anti-oxidant activities of ginseng DSM extracts

The MGME contained significantly the most total phenolics and flavonoids among the tested ginseng DSM extracts (p < 0.05) (Table 6). Total phenolics and flavonoids in the FGME1 and FGME2 were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The MGME exhibited significantly lower DPPH IC50 and ABTS IC50 values than the others (p < 0.05), indicating the MGME possessed higher anti-oxidant activities than the others (Table 6). The more total phenolics and flavonoids of the MGME than those of the others may contribute to their higher anti-oxidant activities.

To summarize, the MGSO had more phytochemicals such as carotenoids, squalene, and phytosterols than the FGSO. The MGME had more anti-oxidant substances and higher anti-oxidant capacities than the FGME. These results suggest that MG seeds may be a novel source of functional foods.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Xu XF, Cheng XL, Lin QH, Li SS, Jia Z, Han T, Lin RC, Wang D, Wei F, Li XR. Identification of mountain-cultivated ginseng and cultivated ginseng using UPLC/oa-TOF MSE with a multivariate statistical sample-profiling strategy. J. Ginseng Res. 2016;40:344–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jung CH, Seog HM, Choi IW, Cho HY. Antioxidant activities of cultivated and wild Korean ginseng leaves. Food Chem. 2005;92:535–540. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.08.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jang HY, Park HS, Kwon KR, Rhim TJ. A study on the comparison of antioxidant effects among wild ginseng, cultivated wild ginseng, and cultivated ginseng extracts. J. Pharmacopunct. 2008;11:67–78. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2008.11.3.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim HJ, Yoo KM, Lee S, Kim KT, Hwang IK. Physicochemical characteristics of various ginseng seeds. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013;45:274–278. doi: 10.9721/KJFST.2013.45.3.274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee CH, Nam KY, Choi KJ. Relationship between the age and chemical components of ginseng root’s portion (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) Korean. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1978;10:263–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhu XM, Hu JN, Shin JA, Lee JH, Hong ST, Lee KT. Comparison of seed oil characteristics from Korean ginseng, Chinese ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) and American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium L.) J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010;15:275–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Beveridge THJ, Li TSC, Drover JCG. Phytosterol content in American ginseng seed oil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2002;50:744–750. doi: 10.1021/jf010701v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim JE, Lee S, Yoo KM, Lee KH, Kim KT, Lee MH, Hwang IK. Quality characteristics of ginseng seed oil obtained by different extraction methods. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014;43:439–445. doi: 10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.3.439. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Galanakis CM. Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2012;26:68–87. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Matthäus B. Antioxidant activity of extracts obtained from residues of different oilseeds. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2002;50:3444–3452. doi: 10.1021/jf011440s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cho SA, Yoo KM, Lee S, Kim KT, Hwang IK. Quality characteristics of nutrition bar substituted with defatted ginseng seed meal. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 2013;29:249–256. doi: 10.9724/kfcs.2013.29.3.249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.AOAC. Official Method of Analysis of AOAC. 15th ed. Method 958.05, 963.15, 970.22, 972.15. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA (1990)
  • 13.AOCS. Official Methods and recommended practices of the AOCS. 6th ed. Method Ce 2-66. American Oil Chemists’ Society. Champaign, IL, USA (2009)
  • 14.Gliszczyńska-Świgło A, Sikorska E. Simple reversed-phase liquid chromatography method for determination of tocopherols in edible plant oils. J. Chromatogr. A. 2004;1048:195–198. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.07.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidant substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Method Enzymol. 1999;299:152–178. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jiang P, Burczynski F, Campbell C, Pierce G, Austria JA, Briggs CJ. Rutin and flavonoid contents in three buckwheat species Fagopyrum esculentum, F. tataricum, and F. homotropicum and their protective effects against lipid peroxidation. Food Res. Int. 2007;40:356–364. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.10.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995;28:25–30. doi: 10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Bio. Med. 1999;26:1231–1237. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ong ASH, Tee ES. Natural sources of carotenoids from plant and oils. Method Enzymol. 1992;213:142–167. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)13118-H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ameny MA, Wilson PW. Relationship between Hunter color values and β-carotene contents in white-fleshed African sweetpotatoes (Ipomoea batatas Lam) J. Sci. Food Agr. 1997;73:301–306. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199703)73:3&#x0003c;301::AID-JSFA726&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Minguez-Mosquera MI, Rejano-Navarro L, Gandul-Rojas B, SanchezGomez AH, Garrido-Fernandez J. Color-pigment correlation in virgin olive oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1991;68:332–336. doi: 10.1007/BF02657688. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maskan M. Change in colour and rheological behaviour of sunflower seed oil during frying and after adsorbent treatment of used oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2003;218:20–25. doi: 10.1007/s00217-003-0807-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ehrenbergerová J, Belcrediová N, Prýma J, Vaculová K, Newman CW. Effect of cultivar, year grown, and cropping system on the content of tocopherols and tocotrienols in grains of hulled and hulless barley. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2006;61:145–150. doi: 10.1007/s11130-006-0024-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kallio H, Yang B, Peippo P. Effects of different origins in harvesting time on vitamin C, tocopherols, and tocotrienols in sea buckthorn (Hippohaë rhamnoides) berries. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2002;50:6136–6142. doi: 10.1021/jf020421v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Matthaus B, Özcan MM. Lipid evaluation of cultivated and wild carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) seed oil growing in Turkey. Sci. Hortic. 2011;130:181–184. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.06.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Catchpole OV, Kamp JCV, Grey JB. Extraction of squalene from shark liver oil in a packed column using supercritical carbon dioxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011;36:4318–4324. doi: 10.1021/ie9702237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Newmark HL. Squalene, olive oil, and cancer risk: review and hypothesis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1999;889:193–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08735.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ryan E, Galvin K, O’Connor TP, Maguire AR, O’Brien NM. Phytosterol, squalene, tocopherol content and fatty acid profile of selected seeds, grains, and legumes. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2007;62:85–91. doi: 10.1007/s11130-007-0046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chirinos R, Pedreschi R, Domínguez G, Campos D. Comparison of the physico-chemical and phytochemical characteristics of the oil of two Plukenetia species. Food Chem. 2015;173:1203–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sivakumar G, Bati CB, Perri E, Uccella N. Gas chromatography screening of bioactive phytosterols from mono-cultivar olive oils. Food Chem. 2006;95:525–528. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wie MJ, Jang SH, Jeong MR, Yoon JM, Jeong HS, Lee JS. Analysis of phytosterol and fatty acid compositions of grape seeds produced in Korea. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009;38:525–528. doi: 10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.4.525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Food Science and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES