Assessment of research waste part 2: wrong study populations- an exemplar of baseline vitamin D status of participants in trials of vitamin D supplementation

Mark J Bolland; Andrew Grey; Alison Avenell

doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0555-1

. 2018 Oct 3;18:101. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0555-1

Assessment of research waste part 2: wrong study populations- an exemplar of baseline vitamin D status of participants in trials of vitamin D supplementation

Mark J Bolland ^1,^✉, Andrew Grey ¹, Alison Avenell ²

PMCID: PMC6171194 PMID: 30285729

Abstract

Background

Research waste can occur when trials are conducted in the wrong populations. Vitamin D deficient populations are most likely to benefit from vitamin D supplementation. We investigated waste attributable to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of supplementation in populations that were not vitamin D deficient.

Methods

In December 2015, we searched Pubmed, recent systematic reviews, and three trial registries for RCTs of vitamin D with clinical endpoints in adults, and 25-hydroxvitamin D (25OHD) survey data relevant to large (N ≥ 1000) RCTs. We investigated the proportion of RCTs that studied vitamin D deficient populations, temporal trends in baseline 25OHD, and whether investigators in large RCTs considered relevant 25OHD survey data or systematic reviews in their trial justifications.

Results

Of 137 RCTs of vitamin D with clinical endpoints, 118 (86%) reported baseline mean/median 25OHD, which was < 25, 25–49, 50–74, and ≥ 75 nmol/L in 12 (10%), 62 (53%), 36 (31%), and 8 (7%) RCTs, respectively. In 70% of RCTs, baseline 25OHD was > 40 nmol/L. Baseline 25OHD increased over time. Before 2006, 38%, 62%, 0% and 0% of RCTs had baseline 25OHD < 25, 25–49, 50–74, and ≥ 75 nmol/L respectively; in 2011–15, the respective proportions were 9%, 49%, 37%, and 6%. Of 12 RCTs with baseline 25OHD < 25 nmol/L, 8 had neutral findings. Of 25 large RCTs (18 completed, 7 ongoing), 1 was undertaken in a vitamin D deficient population, 3 in vitamin D insufficient populations, and 17 had, or probably will have, baseline 25OHD > 40 nmol/L. 44% (8/18) of large completed RCTs cited relevant prior population 25OHD data, and only 3/10 (30%) relevant prior systematic reviews.

Conclusions

Up to 70% of RCTs of vitamin D with clinical endpoints, 71% of large completed RCTs, and 100% of ongoing large RCTs could be considered research waste because they studied cohorts that were not vitamin D deficient.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0555-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Vitamin D, Deficiency, Sufficiency, Randomized controlled trials, Research waste, Fracture, Cardiovascular disease, Cancer, Mortality

Background

Chalmers and Glasziou estimated that 85% of clinical research is wasteful, with 50% of studies having design or major methodological weaknesses [1]. In these companion reports, we assessed research waste in a single field - calcium and vitamin D research. In the first report [2], we focused on redundant research characterized by the undertaking and publication of uninformative observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with surrogate endpoints long after the need for large RCTs with ‘hard’ clinical endpoints was established. In this second report, we address waste characterised by conducting RCTs in poorly targeted population groups.

Clinical guidelines disagree on the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations that constitute vitamin D sufficiency. The Institute of Medicine recommends ≥50 nmol/L to ensure adequate 25OHD for 97.5% of the population, with a median target value of 40 nmol/L [3], whereas the Endocrine Society recommends ≥75 nmol/L [4]. However despite this disagreement, there is general agreement that 25OHD < 25 nmol/L indicates deficiency, and recent UK guidance on vitamin D supplementation is based on maintaining 25OHD above this threshold [5]. Mildly low 25OHD is often termed vitamin D insufficiency, and moderately low 25OHD vitamin D deficiency. Throughout the text, we have used vitamin D deficiency to refer to 25OHD < 25 nmol/L, and insufficiency to 25OHD < 50 nmol/L [6]. Intuitively, supplementing populations that are vitamin D deficient is more likely to produce benefits than supplementing populations with higher 25OHD [7]. Potential benefits of vitamin D could be obscured if a high proportion of participants in RCTs are vitamin D sufficient. Thus, RCTs in cohorts that are vitamin D sufficient are unlikely to show benefits of vitamin D supplementation and could be considered research waste. Recent systematic reviews of RCTs of vitamin D supplementation have not shown benefits on skeletal or non-skeletal endpoints [8–11]. We set out to determine what proportion of RCTs of vitamin D supplementation with clinical endpoints has been conducted in vitamin D deficient populations, and whether baseline 25OHD in such RCTs have changed over time. We then focused on large RCTs either already completed or in progress, identified data on target population vitamin D status available prior to the trial, and determined whether the investigators reported relevant data on vitamin D status. We also determined whether investigators reported relevant systematic reviews in their trial justification, as recommended [1, 12].

Methods

Literature searches

In December 2015, we searched Pubmed for RCTs of vitamin D in adults (>18y) (Additional file 1: Table S1) and for recent systematic reviews on clinical conditions and major surrogate endpoints that were the primary endpoints in identified RCTs (Additional file 1: Tables S2 and S3). We included trials with an untreated or placebo group, trials comparing different vitamin D doses, trials with or without calcium supplements, and trials with multiple interventions provided that 2 study arms differed only by the use of vitamin D. We included quasi-randomized trials but excluded trials where the method of allocation was sequential or unreported, trials where vitamin D was administered routinely post-thyroidectomy, and trials of hydroxylated vitamin D analogues. The flow of articles is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1.

In December 2015, we also searched ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/), the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry (http://www.isrctn.com/) and the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) (http://www.anzctr.org.au/) for completed and ongoing trials, using vitamin D as the search term.

Finally, we obtained vitamin D status survey data from published systematic reviews [13–17]. supplemented by Medline, Embase, and Google searches using our vitamin D search strategy and text words for the countries of interest, and checked citations in reference lists.

Trial classification

We categorised each RCT according to whether clinical or surrogate endpoints were reported in the Abstract (or full-text where there was no Abstract), using the Institute of Medicine definition of surrogate outcomes as “biomarker[s] intended to substitute for a clinical endpoint [and] expected to predict clinical benefit (or harm. ..) based on epidemiologic, therapeutic, pathophysiologic, or other scientific evidence” [18]. Where multiple endpoints were reported, we recorded the most relevant clinical endpoint, and if there were no clinical endpoints, the most clinically relevant surrogate endpoint. Where there were multiple publications from the same RCT, we included the study with the most relevant clinical endpoint or the most clinically relevant surrogate endpoint.

Vitamin D status survey data

For large (N ≥ 1000) completed and ongoing RCTs, we identified surveys of vitamin D status undertaken in the same country and most similar population group, based on age and sex, prior to the trial being undertaken. We preferentially sought data from the five years before trial inception or 10 years before trial completion/publication, but used older data if we could not locate such data.

Analyses

A single author (MB or AA) extracted relevant data. One author (MB) classified trials as having clinical or surrogate endpoints, and a second author (AG) checked the classifications. We report the proportions of trials with mean/median baseline 25OHD < 25, 25–49, 50–74, ≥75 nmol/L over time. In trials with mean/median baseline 25OHD < 25 nmol/L and trials that reported a subgroup analysis based on baseline 25OHD, two authors (MB, AG) independently assessed whether the results of the trial or subgroup analysis were beneficial, neutral, or harmful and disagreements were resolved by consensus.

We examined primary trial publications, and trial protocols (where available), for large RCTs (N ≥ 1000) and assessed whether trial investigators discussed prior relevant evidence on vitamin D status of the intended trial population in their justification for the trial. We also examined whether trial investigators discussed systematic reviews of randomised trials relevant to the primary endpoint that were available before trial recruitment commenced in the Introduction section of the primary publication.

Early 25OHD competitive binding protein (CBP) assays overestimated 25OHD concentrations [19]. As an approximation, we used an adjustment factor of 0.54 for CBP assays in papers published before 2000 [19]. and 0.76 to adjust for overestimation from the Nicholls’ immunoassay [20]. We have presented the RCT and survey data in Tables 3 and 4 corrected for these overestimations.

Table 3.

Large randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplements with relevant prior 25-hydroxyvitamin D surveys

Trial					Survey identified
Reference/ Country	Trial characteristixcs	Baseline 25OHD (nmol/L) /Assay^a	Cites Prior 25OHD Survey (S)/ Prior SR (PSR) /Any SR (ASR)	Recruit-ment started	Survey Date	Group surveyed	25OHD [mean (SD)] (nmol/L)/Assa^a	Survey Reference^b
Chapuy 1994 [21] France	N = 3270 100% Female Mean age 84y	Subg 20 CPB	S:Yes Chapuy 1987 PSR:No^e ASR:No	NS	1984	Men and women Mean age 74-75y	CPB	Chapuy 1987 [71]
						Outpatients	23 (10)
						Long stay hospital	11 (6)
Lips 1996 [22] Netherlands	N = 2578 74% Female Mean age 80y	Subg 27 HPLC	S:Yes Lips 1987 PSR:No^e ASR:No	1988	NS	Men and women Mean age 76y	CPB	Lips 1987 [72]
						Hip fracture patients	10.0 (5.7)
						Apartment dwellers	17.8 (7.3)
					1984–5		CPB	Lowik 1990 [73]
						Men 65-79y	21.6 (10.3)
						Women 65-79y	20.5 (8.6)
					NS	Men and women Mean age 81-84y	CPB	Lips 1988 [74]
						Nursing home	12.7 (4.8)
						Aged people home	12.9 (7.2)
Meyer 2002 [23] Norway	N = 1144 76% Female Mean age 85y	Subg 49 HPLC	S:Yes Mowe 1998 PSR:No^e ASR:Yes	1995	1989	Men and women Mean age 78-80y Hospital patients	HPLC	Mowe 1998 [75]
						Men	40.4 (23.2)
						Women	37.5 (22.6)
						Home-living
						Men	59.6 (28.9)
						Women	48.5 (20.3)
					1989		CPB	Nes 1993 [76]
						Men 75-76y	24.1 (10.1)
						Women 75-76y	25.9 (11.2)
Trivedi 2003 [37] UK	N = 2686 24% Female Mean age 75y	ND	S:No PSR:No^e ASR:No	1996	1994-5	Men and women	Incstar	Finch 1998 [77]
						Free-living 65y+	55.5 (26.9)
						Institution 65+	32.8 (15.7)
Larsen 2004 [24] Denmark	N = 9605 60% Female Mean age 75y	Subg 36 Diasorin	S:Yes Lund 1979 PSR:No^e ASR:Yes	1995	Pre 1979	Men and women	CPB	Lund 1979 [78]
Larsen 2004 [24] Denmark	N = 9605 60% Female Mean age 75y	Subg 36 Diasorin	S:Yes Lund 1979 PSR:No^e ASR:Yes	1995	Pre 1979	61-93y	26.8 (12.4)	Lund 1979 [78]
					1989	Men and women	CPB	van der Wielen 1995 [14]
					1989	75-81y	Men 24 Women 22	van der Wielen 1995 [14]
Grant 2005 [29] UK	N = 5292 85% Female Mean age 77y	Subg 38 HPLC	S:No PSR:Yes ASR:Yes	1999	1994–5	Men and women	Incstar	Finch 1998 [77]
						Free-living 65y+	55.5 (26.9)
						Institution 65+	32.8 (15.7)
Porthouse 2005 [38] UK	N = 3314 100% Female Mean age 77y	ND	S:No PSR:No ASR:No	2001	1994–5	Women	Incstar	Finch 1998 [77]
						Free-living 65y+	51.7 (24.7)
						Institution 65+	32.5 (15.5)
Jackson 2006 [33] USA	N = 36,282 100% Female Mean age 62y	Subg 48 Liaison	S:No PSR:No^e ASR:Yes	1995	1988-94	Men and women	LC-MS/MS equivalent	Schleicher 2016^c [79]
						40-59y	60.1 (58.7,61.5)
						≥60y	58.4 (57.4,59.5)
						All females	59.2 (57.9,60.6)
Law 2006 [34] UK	N = 3717 76% Female Mean age 85y	Subg 47 IDS	S:No PSR:No ASR:No	2000	1994–5	Men and women	Incstar	Finch 1998 [77]
Law 2006 [34] UK	N = 3717 76% Female Mean age 85y	Subg 47 IDS	S:No PSR:No ASR:No	2000	1994–5	Institution 65+	32.8 (15.7)	Finch 1998 [77]
Lyons 2007 [39] UK	N = 3440 76% Female Mean age 84y	ND	S:No PSR:No ASR:Yes	1999	1994–5	Men and women	Incstar	Finch 1998 [77]
Lyons 2007 [39] UK	N = 3440 76% Female Mean age 84y	ND	S:No PSR:No ASR:Yes	1999	1994–5	Institution 65+	32.8 (15.7)	Finch 1998 [77]
Smith 2007 [35] UK	N = 9440 54% Female Mean age 79y	Subg 43 Nicholls	S:No PSR:No ASR:Yes	1998	1994–5	Men and women	Incstar	Finch 1998 [77]
						Free-living 65y+	55.5 (26.9)
						Institution 65+	32.8 (15.7)
Lappe 2008 [25] USA	N = 5201 100% Female Median age 19y	ND	S:Yes Gordon 2004 PSR:No ASR:No	2001	2001–3	Boys and girls	Nichols	Gordon 2004 [80]
						11-18y
						Summer	49.8 (21.3)
						Winter	38.2 (18.8)
					2001–2	Males and females	LC-MS/MS equivalent	Schleicher 2016 [79]
						12-19y	63.0 (60.8,65.2)
						20-39y	62.8 (60.6,64.9)
					1988–94	Males and females	LC-MS/MS equivalent	Schleicher 2016^c [79]
						12-19y	66.2 (64.1,68.4)
						20-39y	64.4 (62.8,66.0)
Salovaara 2010 [30] Finland	N = 3432 100% Female Mean age 67y	Subg 50 Diasorin	S:No PSR:No ASR:Yes	2002	2000–1	Women	Incstar	Kauppi 2009 [81]
Salovaara 2010 [30] Finland	N = 3432 100% Female Mean age 67y	Subg 50 Diasorin	S:No PSR:No ASR:Yes	2002	2000–1	Mean age 53y Age range 30-97y	45.2 (26.4)	Kauppi 2009 [81]
Sanders 2010 [26] Australia	N = 2258 100% Female Mean age 76y	Subg 50 Diasorin	S:Yes Pasco 2001 PSR:No ASR:Yes	2003	1994–7	Women	Incstar	Pasco 2001 [82]
						60-79y	62 (31.7)
						80y+	53 (26.8)
Punthakee 2012 [42] Multinational	N = 1221 41% Female Mean age 67y	ND	S: No PSR: Yes ASR:Yes	2009
Baron 2015 [36] USA	N = 2259 37% Female Mean age 58y	61 IDS	S:No PSR:No^e ASR:Yes	2004	2001-2	Men and women	LC-MS/MS equivalent	Schleicher 2016^c [79]
						40-59y	62.4 (59.9,64.8)
						≥60y	60.4 (58.0,62.9)
Cooper 2016 [27]^d UK	N = 1134 100% Female Mean age 31y	47 Liaison	S:Yes Javaid 2006 PSR:No^e ASR:Yes	2008	1991-2	Pregnant women	IDS	Javaid 2006 [83]
Cooper 2016 [27]^d UK	N = 1134 100% Female Mean age 31y	47 Liaison	S:Yes Javaid 2006 PSR:No^e ASR:Yes	2008	1991-2	Mean 27y	18% < 26.5 31% 26.5–50 52% > 50	Javaid 2006 [83]
					2008–12	Women 19 - 64y	Liaison 47.3	National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2014. [84]
ViDA 2017 [28]^d New Zealand	N = 5110 42% Female Mean age 66y	63 LCMS/MS	S:Yes Rockwell 2006 PSR:Yes ASR:Yes	2011	1996–7	Men 45-64y/65y+	52/55	Rockell 2006 [85]
ViDA 2017 [28]^d New Zealand	N = 5110 42% Female Mean age 66y	63 LCMS/MS	S:Yes Rockwell 2006 PSR:Yes ASR:Yes	2011	1996–7	Women 45-64y/65y+	45/43 Diasorin	Rockell 2006 [85]
					2008–9	Men and women	61/63/66/62	Adult nutrition survey 2009 [86]
					2008–9	45-54y/55-64y/65-74y/≥75y	LCMS/MS	Adult nutrition survey 2009 [86]

Open in a new tab

Table 4.

Planned and ongoing large randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplements with relevant prior 25-hydroxyvitamin D surveys

Trial				Survey identified
Trial/Country	Trial details	Cites 25OHD Survey (S)/ Systematic Review (SR)	Recruitment started	Survey Date	Group surveyed	25OHD[mean/median(SD)] (nmol/L)/Assay	Survey Reference^a
D-Health Australia	N = 21,315, 5y 60,000 IU D3 monthly v placebo Men/women 60-84y ACTRN12613000743763	S:Yes Tran 2012 pilot PSR:Yes ASR:Yes	2014	2010–1	Men and women	41.7 (13.5)	Tran 2012 [87] Waterhouse 2015 [88]
		S:Yes Tran 2012 pilot PSR:Yes ASR:Yes	2014	2010–1	Mean age 72y	Liaison	Tran 2012 [87] Waterhouse 2015 [88]
				2011–2	Men and Women	68.9/69.8/68.6	Australian health survey 2011–2 [89]
				2011–2	55-64y/65-74y/>75y	LCMS/MS	Australian health survey 2011–2 [89]
DO-HEALTH 5 countries in Europe	N = 2152, 3y 2000 IU/d D3 v placebo Men/women ≥70y NCT01745263	S:NDA PSR:NDA ASR: NDA	2012
FIND Finland	N = 2495, 5y 1600 IU/d D3 v 3200 IU/d D3 v placebo Men ≥60y, women ≥65y NCT01463813	S:Yes Hurskainen 2012 PSR:No ASR:Yes	2012	1998- 2001	Men and women	43.4 (17.6)	Hurskainen 2012 [90]
		S:Yes Hurskainen 2012 PSR:No ASR:Yes	2012	1998- 2001	Mean age 62.9y	HPLC	Hurskainen 2012 [90]
	Recruitment stopped early had aimed for 18,000			2003–5	Men and women	64.8 (17.4)	Salminen 2015 [91]
	Recruitment stopped early had aimed for 18,000			2003–5	Mean age 73.5y	IDS	Salminen 2015 [91]
				2011–2	Men and women	58.6 (9.3)	Carlberg 2013 [92]
				2011–2	Mean age 66.6y	HPLC	Carlberg 2013 [92]
TIPS-3 10 countries in Africa, Asia, South/ North America	N = 5000, 5y 60,000 IU D3 3 monthly v placebo Men ≥55y, women ≥60y NCT01646437	S:NDA PSR:NDA ASR:NDA	2012
VIDAL UK	N = 1600, 2y 100,000 IU D3 monthly v placebo Men and women 65-84y ISRCTN46328341 Feasibility trial. Full trial (n = 20,000) not funded	S:Yes Hirani 2005 PSR:Yes ASR:Yes	2012	2000	Private households	Diasorin	Hirani 2005 [93]
					Men 65-79y/80+	58 (27)/48 (24)
					Women 65-79y/80+	49 (25)/45 (20)
					Institutions
					Men 65-79y/80+	40 (24)/37 (20)
					Women 65-79y/80+	37 (18)/37 (19)
VITAL US	N = 25,874, 5y 2000 IU/d D3 v placebo Men ≥50y, women ≥55y NCT01169259	S:Yes Looker 2002 PSR:Yes ASR:Yes	2010	1988–1994	Winter, lower latitude	Diasorin	Looker 2002 [94]
					Women 40-80y+	61.6–59.6
					Men 40-80y+	70.6–68.7
					Summer, higher latitude
					Women 40-80y+	68.6–61.8
					Men 40-80y+	78.8–69.5
				2005–2010	Men and women	LC-MS/MS equivalent	Schleicher 2016^b [79]
					40-59y	60.1–68.7
					≥60y	59.4–72.6
				1988–1994	Men and women	LC-MS/MS equivalent	Schleicher 2016^b [79]
					40-59y	60.1 (58.7,61.5)
					≥60y	58.4 (57.4,59.5)
CAPS US	N = 2303, 5y 2000 IU D3 and 1500 mg calcium daily v calcium Women ≥55y NCT01052051	S:NDA PSR:NDA ASR:NDA	2009	2005–2010	Men and women	LC-MS/MS equivalent	Schleicher 2016^b [79]
					40-59y	60.1–68.7
					≥60y	59.4–72.6
					All females	60.9–69.1

Open in a new tab

Results

Baseline 25OHD in randomised controlled trials

From 4682 unique Pubmed records and 38 systematic reviews, we identified 779 publications from 547 RCTs of vitamin D, of which 137 (111,976 participants) reported a clinical endpoint in the Abstract (Additional file 1: Tables S1, S2, S3 and Figure S1). Figure 1a shows that the rate of publication of RCTs has increased markedly, with 11 RCTs in 2001–5, 28 in 2006–10, and 88 in 2011–15. Mean/median baseline 25OHD was reported in 118/137 (86%) RCTs (Fig. 1b), with 62%, 82%, and 93% of RCTs reporting baseline 25OHD before 2006, in 2006–10, and in 2011–15 respectively. Overall, mean/median baseline 25OHD was < 25, 25–49, 50–74, and ≥ 75 nmol/L in 12 (10%), 62 (53%), 36 (31%), and 8 (7%) RCTs, respectively. In 70% of RCTs, baseline 25OHD was > 40 nmol/L. Of 12 RCTs with baseline 25OHD < 25 nmol/L, 8 had neutral findings (Table 1).

Fig. 1 — Panel a shows the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of vitamin D with clinical endpoints in the Abstract published over time by year (bars) and cumulatively (line). Panel b shows the distribution of mean/median baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations in these RCTs. Panel c shows the 25OHD concentrations plotted against year of publication with a line of best fit. Panel d shows the proportion of trials with mean/median baseline 25OHD < 25, 25–49, 50–74 and ≥ 75 nmol/L by year of publication. Above each bar is the number of trials

Table 1.

Characteristics of 12 randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplements in populations with mean/median 25OHD < 25 nmol/L and clinical endpoints reported in abstract

Study	Clinical endpoint	Endpoint type	Study Size (N)	25OHD Assay	Mean/Median 25OHD (SD) (nmol/L)^a	Result of Trial^b
Brooke 1980 [44]	Newborn outcomes	Secondary	126	CBP	11 (1)	Benefit
Chapuy 1994 [21]	Fracture	Primary	3270	CBP	20 (14)	Benefit
Pfeifer 2000 [45]	Risk of fall	Secondary	148	Nicholls	19 (10)	Neutral
Chapuy 2002 [46]	Fracture	Secondary	583	Incstar	22 (16)	Neutral
Bischoff 2003 [47]	Risk of fall	Primary	122	Nicholls	23 (N/A)	Neutral
Martineau 2011 [48]	Tuberculosis sputum culture conversion	Primary	126	LCMS/MS	21 (20)	Neutral
Mosayebi 2011 [49]	Multiple sclerosis disability score	Primary	59	IDS	25 (7)	Neutral
Amestejani 2012 [50]	Atopic dermatitis	Primary	60	Biosource	24 (5)	Benefit
Schreuder 2012 [51]	Pain	Primary	84	Diasorin	20 (10)	Neutral
Mozaffari-Khosravi 2013 [52]	Depression score	Primary	120	IDS	23 (N/A)	Benefit
Hossain 2014 [53]	Pregnancy outcomes	Primary	200	Immunoassay	13 (N/A)	Neutral
Bhan 2015 [54]	All-cause mortality	Secondary	105	LCMS/MS	22 (7)	Neutral

Open in a new tab

^aAdjusted for assay- see text for details

^bBased on intention-to-treat analysis of all randomized participants for relevant endpoint. Assessed independently by two authors (MB, AG)

Studies are listed in Additional file 1: Table S3 and the Additional file 1: Reference list

Abbreviations: 25OHD 25-hydroxyvitamin D, SD standard deviation, N/A not available. CBP competitive binding protein; LCMS/MS- liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry

Figure 1c and d show that mean/median baseline 25OHD has increased over time. Before 2006, 38% of RCTs had 25OHD < 25 nmol/L, 62% between 25 and 49 nmol/L, and none ≥50 nmol/L. In 2006–10 and 2011–15, 0% and 9% respectively of RCTs had 25OHD < 25 nmol/L, while 61% and 49% respectively had 25OHD 25–49 nmol/L, 26% and 37% respectively had 25OHD 50–74 nmol/L, and 13% and 6% respectively had 25OHD ≥75 nmol/L.

Of 118 RCTs that reported mean/median baseline 25OHD, 19 (16%) reported a subgroup analysis for baseline 25OHD (Table 2). The 25OHD thresholds used in these analyses ranged from 20 to 80 nmol/L, with 5 analyses based on thresholds ≤25 nmol/L and 16 on thresholds ≤50 nmol/L. Table 2 shows that 17 RCTs reported similar results in the subgroup analysis and the main analysis for the primary endpoint (16 both analyses neutral, and 1 both analyses showed benefit for vitamin D). Three of these 17 RCTs reported a benefit for vitamin D for a secondary endpoint in a subgroup analysis. Another RCT did not report the result of the subgroup analysis for the primary endpoint, but reported a benefit for vitamin D for a secondary endpoint. Lastly, one RCT had co-primary endpoints and neutral results in the main analyses, but in the subgroup analyses there was a benefit for vitamin D for one endpoint and neutral results for the other. Four of the five RCTs that reported subgroup analyses with a 25OHD threshold of ≤25 nmol/L had neutral results for the primary endpoint in the main analysis, and none of these 4 RCTs reported beneficial effects for the primary endpoint in the subgroup analysis.

Table 2.

Results of 18 randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplements reporting subgroup analyses for baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D

Study	25OHD threshold (nmol/L)	Subgroup Result^a	Comparison to primary analysis^a
Jackson 2006 [33]	32.2	Neutral	Same
Jorde 2008 [55]	40	NR	N/A^b
Wejse 2009 [56]	75	Neutral	Same
Martineau 2011 [48]	20	Neutral	Same
Rastelli 2011 [57]	50	Neutral	Same^c
Kjaergaard 2012 [58]	25	Neutral	Same
Lehouck 2012 [59]	25	Neutral	Same^b
Murdoch 2012 [60]	50	Neutral	Same
Abou-Raya 2013 [61]	25	Benefit	Same
McAlindon 2013 [62]	37.5	Neutral	Same
Amrein 2014 [63]	30	Neutral	Same^b
Lopez-Torres Hidalgo 2014 [64]	80	Neutral	Same
Tran 2014 [65]	50	Neutral	Same
Turner 2014 [66]	50	Neutral	Same
Baron 2015 [36]	57.9	Neutral	Same
Martineau 2015 [67]	50	Benefit	Different^d
Miskulin 2015 [68]	37.5	Neutral	Same
Sandoughi 2015 [69]	50	Neutral	Same
Tukvadze 2015 [70]	25	Neutral	Same

Open in a new tab

^a Assessed independently by two authors (MB, AG)

^b Benefit for secondary endpoint in subgroup analysis

^c Primary endpoint not specified. Benefits in subgroup analyses for some but not all reported endpoints

^d Two co-primary endpoints. Benefit in subgroup analysis for one co-primary endpoints. For other co-primary endpoint, subgroup analysis was neutral. In primary analyses, results for both co-primary endpoints were neutral

Studies are listed in Additional file 1: Table S3 and Reference list

Abbreviations: 25OHD 25-hydroxyvitamin D, NR not reported; N/A not applicable

Large randomised controlled trials and prior 25OHD surveys

Tables 3 and 4 show 18 published RCTs of vitamin D with ≥1000 participants (101,383 participants), and 7 planned and ongoing trials (79,939 intended participants). We included the pilot stage for the UK VIDAL trial with 1600 participants, which aimed to continue and recruit 20,000 participants, but has not yet received funding for the full roll out. All trials were/are conducted exclusively in North America, Europe, Australia or New Zealand, except for two multinational trials with countries from South America, Asia and Africa. 22/25 trials were in single countries: we did not examine prior 25OHD surveys for the 3 multinational trials.

Table 3 shows that only 8 [21–28] of the 18 completed trials (44%) cited the vitamin D status of a population similar to the recruited cohort in the primary publication. One further trial [29] discussed survey data in the trial paper’s introduction, but this was not used in the grant application. Investigators from two of these trials [21, 22] had undertaken prior relevant 25OHD surveys. Four of the eight trials cited old survey data, from at least 16 years [24, 27] and 6–9 years [23, 26] before trial recruitment. A trial from Finland that studied older adults (mean age 62y) cited survey data that lacked relevance, being from the USA and from young Finnish adults (mean age 38y) [30].

Table 4 shows that all four ongoing trials with accessible documents discuss the vitamin D status of their intended trial population. One trial in Australia conducted a pilot study that included assessment of vitamin D status. The US VITAL trial which started recruitment in 2010, used NHANES III (1988–94) data in its rationale and design paper justification [31, 32].

Table 3 shows that baseline 25OHD in large completed RCTs and relevant survey 25OHD data were comparable, apart from one Norwegian trial, where one survey indicated considerably worse vitamin D status than was observed in trial participants [23]. Only one [21] of the completed trials was conducted in a population that was clearly vitamin D deficient, based on trial (mean baseline 25OHD 20 nmol/L) and survey data (mean 11–23 nmol/L). Three trials [22, 24, 29] were undertaken in populations comprised largely of participants with vitamin D insufficiency. Of the remaining 13 single country trials with baseline 25OHD or relevant survey data, five trials [23, 27, 33–35] had mean baseline 25OHD ≥40 nmol/L and four trials 25OHD ≥50 nmol/L [26, 28, 30, 36]. Four trials [25, 37–39] did not report baseline 25OHD, but surveys and data from similar RCTs suggest that baseline 25OHD in the RCT would have been ≥40 nmol/L in three of these trials [25, 37, 38]. In these 13 trials, a substantial proportion of participants would have had 25OHD ≥50 nmol/L, consistent with the IOM definition of vitamin D sufficiency [3].

Table 4 shows that, based on survey data from the relevant population, all the ongoing single country trials are likely to recruit participants in whom the mean/median baseline 25OHD will be > 40–50 nmol/L, and none describe specific strategies for recruiting participants with 25OHD < 25 nmol/L.

Large randomised controlled trials and citation of prior systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

We identified a relevant systematic review on vitamin D and fracture [40] published prior to trial recruitment starting for 8 completed large RCTs, and on mortality [41] for 2 RCTs, but no prior systematic reviews on colorectal adenoma or neonatal bone mineral content for two RCTs (Table 3). Thus, systematic reviews capable of informing the trial justification and design were available before trial recruitment in 10/18 (56%) of completed large RCTs. Only three [28, 29, 42] of the 10 RCTs (30%) cited such a systematic review in their primary publication. Nine trials (50%) cited systematic reviews that would have occurred after the decision had been made to undertake the trial. Four of the seven planned or ongoing trials with accessible relevant documents discuss systematic reviews in their protocols or publications: for three of the trials, the systematic reviews predate trial recruitment.

Discussion

Our results suggest a high proportion of research waste in RCTs of vitamin D supplementation. The recent proliferation of vitamin D RCTs was accompanied by increasing baseline 25OHD concentrations and therefore a declining proportion of RCTs conducted in vitamin D deficient cohorts. Only 10% of trials were carried out in populations that would be widely accepted as vitamin D deficient, in which benefits of vitamin D supplementation still have not been unequivocally established (Table 1). Because many participants in recent trials were vitamin D sufficient, they would be unlikely to benefit from vitamin D. Further, their inclusion could have obscured potential benefits from vitamin D for those participants who were vitamin D deficient. This issue applies to RCTs with mean/median baseline 25OHD in ranges variously defined as sufficient (7% with 25OHD ≥75 nmol/L, 37% with 25OHD ≥50 nmol/L). It likely also applies to the 33% of trials with baseline 25OHD 40–49 nmol/L in which a substantial proportion of participants will have had 25OHD ≥50 nmol/L. Thus, 7–37% of trials can be considered research waste, because they were conducted in the wrong population, but this proportion is as high as 70% if a 25OHD threshold for sufficiency of 40 nmol/L was applied, based on the Institute of Medicine’s target median value.

Very importantly, research waste was prevalent in large RCTs that were designed to inform clinical practice. Only 1 such trial was carried out in a vitamin D deficient population and another 3 in populations with vitamin D insufficiency. Twelve (71%) of the remaining completed and 5 (100%) ongoing single country trials had, or are likely to have, mean baseline 25OHD > 40 nmol/L, and based on survey and other trial data, we estimate that about 50% would have 25OHD ≥50 nmol/L. Failure to incorporate key available data during protocol development may have contributed to the high prevalence of waste. Few (44%) of the large completed RCTs cited or undertook prior relevant surveys of vitamin D status in their intended trial population. Only 56% of large completed RCTs had a relevant systematic review of randomised trials published prior to trial recruitment starting and, of these, only 30% cited such a review. When systematic reviews of randomised trials were discussed, they tended to have been published after the trial had commenced or been completed. Collectively, this suggests that these large, costly RCTs were not optimally designed to address the question of benefits of vitamin D supplements.

An important strength of this study assessing research waste is that we analysed the complete set of RCTs of vitamin D published over 30 years. The results from this single research area might not apply to other research fields, and waste may be more prevalent in mature as opposed to emerging areas of research. In assessing whether trials cited 25OHD surveys or relevant systematic reviews, we examined primary publications and protocols where available. Our results may have changed if we were able to examine grant applications and trial protocols, but protocols were often not available, and we had access to only one grant application [29]. Early 25OHD assays tended to overestimate 25OHD- we used 25OHD concentrations corrected for these overestimates. The corrected values are approximations, but nevertheless lower than the original values in the relevant trials and surveys, and therefore the proportions of participants with vitamin D deficiency in our analyses are higher than in the original publications. Very few RCTs reported the season when 25OHD measurements were obtained. Although seasonal changes in 25OHD will occur in all treatment arms, it is possible that seasonal effects of 25OHD might confound some trial results. A limitation of this study is that the literature search was conducted in December 2015.

The implications of this research are that the current body of RCTs of vitamin D with clinical endpoints, including large RCTs with ≥1000 participants, is largely conducted in populations that are not vitamin D deficient. Recent, large systematic reviews of these RCTs report no benefits of vitamin D [8–11]. In trials included in these meta-analyses reporting 25OHD, 72–75% had baseline 25OHD < 50 nmol/L [10, 43], consistent with Fig. 1d showing that the majority of trials prior to 2011 had baseline 25OHD < 50 nmol/L. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that current evidence is sufficient to exclude benefits from vitamin D supplementation for unselected community-dwelling individuals with 25OHD > 30–40 nmol/L. Relatively few trials, including only 5003 participants (Table 1), have been carried out in populations with lower baseline 25OHD and their results are inconsistent, with only 33% of such trials reporting beneficial results from vitamin D. Subgroup analyses of participants with lower 25OHD at baseline were frequently undertaken but their results were invariably similar to the results of the main analyses for the primary endpoint, even when the subgroup was restricted to people with 25OHD ≤25 nmol/L. Therefore, it is uncertain whether vitamin D supplementation benefits people with clearly low 25OHD. Based on data from relevant 25OHD surveys, the large RCTs currently underway will not test the effects of vitamin D supplementation in deficient populations and therefore are unlikely to address this knowledge gap. Instead of continuing to spend resources on trials in vitamin D sufficient populations, investigators should focus on vitamin D deficient populations. Food fortification policies [15, 16], together with independent action by food manufacturers and new advice on supplementation [5], make it even less likely that future trials in deficient populations will be possible.

Our analyses suggest that up to 70% of RCTs with clinical endpoints, 71% of large (N ≥ 1000) completed RCTs, and 100% of ongoing large RCTs could be considered research waste because they studied cohorts with a high proportion of vitamin D sufficiency. In our companion paper [2], we reported that 69% of RCTs of vitamin D conducted since 2005 with skeletal endpoints of bone mineral density or fracture were research waste because they lacked novelty or did not add to existing clinical knowledge. Taken together, these findings support the very high proportions (> 85%) for research waste estimated by Chalmers and Glasziou [1].

Conclusions

We identified a very high proportion of research waste in RCTs of vitamin D with clinical endpoints. Few RCTs were carried out in vitamin D deficient populations most likely to benefit from vitamin D supplementation, and conversely most RCTs were carried out in populations unlikely to benefit from supplementation. Few large RCTs appeared to consider systematic reviews in their design. Ongoing large RCTs share the same weaknesses of previous trials. Strategies to improve the design of RCTs should be introduced and studied to determine whether they can reduce research waste.

Additional file

Additional file 1:^{(313.5KB, docx)}

Table S1. Searches of Pubmed undertaken in December 2015. Table S2. 38 Systematic reviews identified in Pubmed search. Table S3. Characteristics of 137 randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplements with clinical endpoints reported in abstract. Table S4. Large completed randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplements with relevant prior 25-hydroxyvitamin D surveys. Table S5. Large ongoing randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplements with relevant prior 25-hydroxyvitamin D surveys. Figure S1. flow of studies. References. (DOCX 313 kb)

Acknowledgements

We thank the following for providing further information about their trial or survey: Paul Atyeo, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australia; Anne Looker, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA; Briony Romero and Rachel Neale, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia. We also thank David Cooper, HSRU, University of Aberdeen, UK, for statistical advice; Shaun Treweek, HSRU, and Hilde Stromme, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, for help locating a Norwegian publication.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this study. MB receives salary support from the Health Research Council of New Zealand. The Health Services Research Unit is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates. The funders had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information file.

Abbreviations

25OHD: 25-hydroxyvitamin D
CBP: Competitive binding protein
RCT: Randomised controlled trial

Authors’ contributions

MB, AG and AA designed the research. MB and AA performed the literature searches and extracted the data. MB, AA and AG reviewed the studies. MB and AA performed the analyses. MB drafted the paper. All authors critically reviewed and improved it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MB, AG, and AA have all published randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews in the fields of calcium and vitamin D but otherwise have no competing interests to declare.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Mark J. Bolland, Phone: 64 9 373 7999, Email: m.bolland@auckland.ac.nz

Andrew Grey, Email: a.grey@auckland.ac.nz.

Alison Avenell, Email: a.avenell@abdn.ac.uk.

References

1.Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374:86–89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Bolland MJ, Avenell A, Grey A. Assessment of research waste part 1: an exemplar from examining study design, surrogate and clinical endpoints in studies of calcium intake and vitamin D supplementation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 10.1186/s12874-018-0556-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3.IOM (Institute of Medicine) Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:1911–1930. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN). Vitamin D and Health. 2016:Available on line at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/537616/SACN_Vitamin_D_and_Health_report.pdf (Accessed 25 July 2016).
6.Lips P. Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:477–501. doi: 10.1210/edrv.22.4.0437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Heaney RP. Guidelines for optimizing design and analysis of clinical studies of nutrient effects. Nutr Rev. 2014;72:48–54. doi: 10.1111/nure.12090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Autier P, Boniol M, Pizot C, Mullie P. Vitamin D status and ill health: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:76–89. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Avenell A, Mak JC, O'Connell D. Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD000227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000227.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Bolland MJ, Grey A, Gamble GD, Reid IR. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:307–320. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70212-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Theodoratou E, Tzoulaki I, Zgaga L, Ioannidis JP. Vitamin D and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. BMJ. 2014;348:g2035. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Lund H, Brunnhuber K, Juhl C, Robinson K, Leenaars M, Dorch BF, et al. Towards evidence based research. BMJ. 2016;355:i5440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.McKenna MJ. Differences in vitamin D status between countries in young adults and the elderly. Am J Med. 1992;93:69–77. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90682-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.van der Wielen RP, Lowik MR, van den Berg H, de Groot LC, Haller J, Moreiras O, et al. Serum vitamin D concentrations among elderly people in Europe. Lancet. 1995;346:207–210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91266-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Hilger J, Friedel A, Herr R, Rausch T, Roos F, Wahl DA, et al. A systematic review of vitamin D status in populations worldwide. Br J Nutr. 2014;111:23–45. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513001840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Spiro A, Buttriss JL. Vitamin D: an overview of vitamin D status and intake in Europe. Nutr Bull. 2014;39:322–350. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Cashman KD, Dowling KG, Skrabakova Z, Gonzalez-Gross M, Valtuena J, De Henauw S, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:1033–1044. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.120873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.IOM (Institute of Medicine) Evaluation of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in chronic disease. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Lips P, Chapuy MC, Dawson-Hughes B, Pols HA, Holick MF. An international comparison of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:394–397. doi: 10.1007/s001980050162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Carter GD, Carter R, Jones J, Berry J. How accurate are assays for 25-hydroxyvitamin D? Data from the international vitamin D external quality assessment scheme. Clin Chem. 2004;50:2195–2197. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.040683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Chapuy MC, Arlot ME, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ. Effect of calcium and cholecalciferol treatment for three years on hip fractures in elderly women. BMJ. 1994;308:1081–1082. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6936.1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Lips P, Graafmans WC, Ooms ME, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM. Vitamin D supplementation and fracture incidence in elderly persons. A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:400–406. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-4-199602150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Meyer HE, Smedshaug GB, Kvaavik E, Falch JA, Tverdal A, Pedersen JI. Can vitamin D supplementation reduce the risk of fracture in the elderly? A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:709–715. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Larsen ER, Mosekilde L, Foldspang A. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation prevents osteoporotic fractures in elderly community dwelling residents: a pragmatic population-based 3-year intervention study. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:370–378. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.0301240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Lappe J, Cullen D, Haynatzki G, Recker R, Ahlf R, Thompson K. Calcium and vitamin d supplementation decreases incidence of stress fractures in female navy recruits. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:741–749. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Simpson JA, Kotowicz MA, Young D, et al. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303:1815–1822. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Cooper C, Harvey NC, Bishop NJ, Kennedy S, Papageorghiou AT, Schoenmakers I, et al. Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone health (MAVIDOS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:393–402. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00044-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Scragg R, Stewart AW, Waayer D, Lawes CMM, Toop L, Sluyter J, et al. Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular disease in the vitamin D assessment study a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:608–616. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Grant AM, Avenell A, Campbell MK, McDonald AM, MacLennan GS, McPherson GC, et al. Oral vitamin D3 and calcium for secondary prevention of low-trauma fractures in elderly people (randomised evaluation of calcium or vitamin D, RECORD): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1621–1628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63013-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Salovaara K, Tuppurainen M, Karkkainen M, Rikkonen T, Sandini L, Sirola J, et al. Effect of vitamin D(3) and calcium on fracture risk in 65- to 71-year-old women: a population-based 3-year randomized, controlled trial--the OSTPRE-FPS. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:1487–1495. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Lee IM, Cook NR, Albert MA, Gordon D, et al. The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL): rationale and design of a large randomized controlled trial of vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acid supplements for the primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Bassuk SS, Manson JE, Lee IM, Cook NR, Christen WG, Bubes VY, et al. Baseline characteristics of participants in the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;47:235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, Gass M, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(7):669–83. [DOI] [PubMed]
34.Law M, Withers H, Morris J, Anderson F. Vitamin D supplementation and the prevention of fractures and falls: results of a randomised trial in elderly people in residential accommodation. Age Ageing. 2006;35:482–486. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afj080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Smith H, Anderson F, Raphael H, Maslin P, Crozier S, Cooper C. Effect of annual intramuscular vitamin D on fracture risk in elderly men and women--a population-based, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1852–1857. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Baron John A., Barry Elizabeth L., Mott Leila A., Rees Judy R., Sandler Robert S., Snover Dale C., Bostick Roberd M., Ivanova Anastasia, Cole Bernard F., Ahnen Dennis J., Beck Gerald J., Bresalier Robert S., Burke Carol A., Church Timothy R., Cruz-Correa Marcia, Figueiredo Jane C., Goodman Michael, Kim Adam S., Robertson Douglas J., Rothstein Richard, Shaukat Aasma, Seabrook March E., Summers Robert W. A Trial of Calcium and Vitamin D for the Prevention of Colorectal Adenomas. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(16):1519–1530. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Trivedi DP, Doll R, Khaw KT. Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;326:469. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Porthouse J, Cockayne S, King C, Saxon L, Steele E, Aspray T, et al. Randomised controlled trial of calcium and supplementation with cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) for prevention of fractures in primary care. BMJ. 2005;330:1003. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Lyons RA, Johansen A, Brophy S, Newcombe RG, Phillips CJ, Lervy B, et al. Preventing fractures among older people living in institutional care: a pragmatic randomised double blind placebo controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:811–818. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0309-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Gillespie WJ, Henry DA, O'Connell DL, Robertson J. Vitamin D, vitamin D analogues and calcium in prevention of fractures in involutional and postmenopausal osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1996;3:18. [Google Scholar]
41.Autier P, Gandini S. Vitamin D supplementation and Total mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1730–1737. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.16.1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Punthakee Z, Bosch J, Dagenais G, Diaz R, Holman R, Probstfield J, et al. Design, history and results of the thiazolidinedione intervention with vitamin D evaluation (TIDE) randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2012;55:36–45. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2357-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Bolland MJ, Grey A, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Vitamin D supplementation and falls: a trial sequential meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:573–580. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70068-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Brooke O G, Brown I R, Bone C D, Carter N D, Cleeve H J, Maxwell J D, Robinson V P, Winder S M. Vitamin D supplements in pregnant Asian women: effects on calcium status and fetal growth. BMJ. 1980;280(6216):751–754. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6216.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Pfeifer Michael, Begerow Bettina, Minne Helmut W., Abrams Christine, Nachtigall Detlef, Hansen Corinna. Effects of a Short-Term Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Body Sway and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Elderly Women. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2000;15(6):1113–1118. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.6.1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Chapuy M. C., Pamphile R., Paris E., Kempf C., Schlichting M., Arnaud S., Garnero P., Garnero P., Meunier P. J. Combined Calcium and Vitamin D3 Supplementation in Elderly Women: Confirmation of Reversal of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Hip Fracture Risk: The Decalyos II Study. Osteoporosis International. 2002;13(3):257–264. doi: 10.1007/s001980200023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Bischoff Heike A, Stähelin Hannes B, Dick Walter, Akos Regula, Knecht Margrith, Salis Christian, Nebiker Matthias, Theiler Robert, Pfeifer Michael, Begerow Bettina, Lew Robert A, Conzelmann Martin. Effects of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Falls: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2003;18(2):343–351. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.2.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Martineau AR, Timms PM, Bothamley GH, et al. High-dose vitamin D(3) during intensive-phase antimicrobial treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):242–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49.Mosayebi Ghasem, Ghazavi Ali, Ghasami Keyvan, Jand Yahya, Kokhaei Parviz. Therapeutic Effect of Vitamin D3 in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Immunological Investigations. 2011;40(6):627–639. doi: 10.3109/08820139.2011.573041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Amestejani M, Salehi BS, Vasigh M, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a clinical trial study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11(3):327–30. [PubMed]
51.Schreuder F., Bernsen R. M. D., van der Wouden J. C. Vitamin D Supplementation for Nonspecific Musculoskeletal Pain in Non-Western Immigrants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2012;10(6):547–555. doi: 10.1370/afm.1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Mozaffari-Khosravi Hassan, Nabizade Lale, Yassini-Ardakani Seyed Mojtaba, Hadinedoushan Hossein, Barzegar Kazem. The Effect of 2 Different Single Injections of High Dose of Vitamin D on Improving the Depression in Depressed Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2013;33(3):378–385. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31828f619a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Hossain Nazli, Kanani Fatima H., Ramzan Shabana, Kausar Robina, Ayaz Shabana, Khanani Rafiq, Pal Lubna. Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes of Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation: Results of an Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial of Antenatal Vitamin D Supplementation in Pakistani Women. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2014;99(7):2448–2455. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Bhan I., Dobens D., Tamez H., Deferio J. J., Li Y. C., Warren H. S., Ankers E., Wenger J., Tucker J. K., Trottier C., Pathan F., Kalim S., Nigwekar S. U., Thadhani R. Nutritional Vitamin D Supplementation in Dialysis: A Randomized Trial. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2015;10(4):611–619. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06910714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Jorde R., Sneve M., Figenschau Y., Svartberg J., Waterloo K. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on symptoms of depression in overweight and obese subjects: randomized double blind trial. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2008;264(6):599–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.02008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Wejse Christian, Gomes Victor F., Rabna Paulo, Gustafson Per, Aaby Peter, Lisse Ida M., Andersen Paul L., Glerup Henning, Sodemann Morten. Vitamin D as Supplementary Treatment for Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2009;179(9):843–850. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200804-567OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Rastelli Antonella L., Taylor Marie E., Gao Feng, Armamento-Villareal Reina, Jamalabadi-Majidi Shohreh, Napoli Nicola, Ellis Matthew J. Vitamin D and aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS): a phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2011;129(1):107–116. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1644-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Kjærgaard Marie, Waterloo Knut, Wang Catharina E. A., Almås Bjørg, Figenschau Yngve, Hutchinson Moira S., Svartberg Johan, Jorde Rolf. Effect of vitamin D supplement on depression scores in people with low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D: nested case—control study and randomised clinical trial. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;201(05):360–368. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.104349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Lehouck An, Mathieu Chantal, Carremans Claudia, Baeke Femke, Verhaegen Jan, Van Eldere Johan, Decallonne Brigitte, Bouillon Roger, Decramer Marc, Janssens Wim. High Doses of Vitamin D to Reduce Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2012;156(2):105. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Murdoch David R., Slow Sandy, Chambers Stephen T., Jennings Lance C., Stewart Alistair W., Priest Patricia C., Florkowski Christopher M., Livesey John H., Camargo Carlos A., Scragg Robert. Effect of Vitamin D3Supplementation on Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in Healthy Adults. JAMA. 2012;308(13):1333. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.12505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.ABOU-RAYA A., ABOU-RAYA S., HELMII M. The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Inflammatory and Hemostatic Markers and Disease Activity in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2012;40(3):265–272. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.McAlindon Timothy, LaValley Michael, Schneider Erica, Nuite Melynn, Lee Ji Yeon, Price Lori Lyn, Lo Grace, Dawson-Hughes Bess. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Progression of Knee Pain and Cartilage Volume Loss in Patients With Symptomatic Osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2013;309(2):155. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.164487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Amrein Karin, Schnedl Christian, Holl Alexander, Riedl Regina, Christopher Kenneth B., Pachler Christoph, Urbanic Purkart Tadeja, Waltensdorfer Andreas, Münch Andreas, Warnkross Helga, Stojakovic Tatjana, Bisping Egbert, Toller Wolfgang, Smolle Karl-Heinz, Berghold Andrea, Pieber Thomas R., Dobnig Harald. Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D3on Hospital Length of Stay in Critically Ill Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency. JAMA. 2014;312(15):1520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Lopez-Torres Hidalgo J, Grupo A. [Effect of calcium and vitamin D in the reduction of falls in the elderly: a randomized trial versus placebo]. Med Clin (Barc). 2014;142(3):95–102. [DOI] [PubMed]
65.Tran Bich, Armstrong Bruce K, Ebeling Peter R, English Dallas R, Kimlin Michael G, van der Pols Jolieke C, Venn Alison, Gebski Val, Whiteman David C, Webb Penelope M, Neale Rachel E. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on antibiotic use: a randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2013;99(1):156–161. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.063271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Turner Abigail Norris, Carr Reese Patricia, Fields Karen S., Anderson Julie, Ervin Melissa, Davis John A., Fichorova Raina N., Roberts Mysheika Williams, Klebanoff Mark A., Jackson Rebecca D. A blinded, randomized controlled trial of high-dose vitamin D supplementation to reduce recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;211(5):479.e1-479.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Martineau AR, MacLaughlin BD, Hooper RL, et al. Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial of bolus-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in adults with asthma (ViDiAs). Thorax. 2015;70(5):451–57. [DOI] [PubMed]
68.Miskulin DC, Majchrzak K, Tighiouart H, et al. Ergocalciferol Supplementation in Hemodialysis Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69.Sandoughi Mahnaz, Zakeri Zahra, Mirhosainee Zahra, Mohammadi Mahdi, Shahbakhsh Sogol. The effect of vitamin D on nonspecific low back pain. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases. 2013;18(8):854–858. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Tukvadze Nestan, Sanikidze Ekaterina, Kipiani Maia, Hebbar Gautam, Easley Kirk A, Shenvi Neeta, Kempker Russell R, Frediani Jennifer K, Mirtskhulava Veriko, Alvarez Jessica A, Lomtadze Nino, Vashakidze Lamara, Hao Li, Del Rio Carlos, Tangpricha Vin, Blumberg Henry M, Ziegler Thomas R. High-dose vitamin D3 in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2015;102(5):1059–1069. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.113886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Chapuy M C, Chapuy P, Meunier P J. Calcium and vitamin D supplements: effects on calcium metabolism in elderly people. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1987;46(2):324–328. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/46.2.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Lips P, van Ginkel F C, Jongen M J, Rubertus F, van der Vijgh W J, Netelenbos J C. Determinants of vitamin D status in patients with hip fracture and in elderly control subjects. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1987;46(6):1005–1010. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/46.6.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.Löwik M R, Schrijver J, Odink J, van den Berg H, Wedel M, Hermus R J. Nutrition and aging: nutritional status of “apparently healthy” elderly (Dutch nutrition surveillance system) Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 1990;9(1):18–27. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1990.10720345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74.LIPS P., WIERSINGA A., VAN GINKEL F. C., JONGEN M. J. M., NETELENBOS J. C., HACKENG W. H. L., DELMAS P. D., VAN DER VIJGH W. J. F. The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Vitamin D Status and Parathyroid Function in Elderly Subjects*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1988;67(4):644–650. doi: 10.1210/jcem-67-4-644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75.Mowe M, Bohmer T, Haug E. Vitamin D-mangel hos eldre sykehusinnlagte og hjemmeboende i Oslo. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1998;118:3929–31. [PubMed]
76.Nes M, Lund-Larsen K, Trygg K, Hoivik HO, Pedersen JI. Nutrition and the elderly in Europe: low prevalence of obesity and biochemical deficiencies in Norwegian subjects. Age Nutr 1993;4:72–81.
77.Finch S, Doyle W, Lowe C, Bates CJ, Prentice A, Smithers G, Clarke PC. National diet and nutrition survey: people aged 65 years and over. London: The Stationery Office; 1998.
78.Lund B., Sørensen O. H. Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum and its relation to sunshine, age and vitamin D intake in the Danish population. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 1979;39(1):23–30. doi: 10.3109/00365517909104935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79.Schleicher Rosemary L, Sternberg Maya R, Lacher David A, Sempos Christopher T, Looker Anne C, Durazo-Arvizu Ramon A, Yetley Elizabeth A, Chaudhary-Webb Madhulika, Maw Khin L, Pfeiffer Christine M, Johnson Clifford L. The vitamin D status of the US population from 1988 to 2010 using standardized serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D shows recent modest increases. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2016;104(2):454–461. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.127985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80.Gordon Catherine M., DePeter Kerrin C., Feldman Henry A., Grace Estherann, Emans S. Jean. Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency Among Healthy Adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2004;158(6):531. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.6.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81.Kauppi Maarit, Impivaara Olli, Mäki Juhani, Heliövaara Markku, Marniemi Jukka, Montonen Jukka, Jula Antti. Vitamin D status and common risk factors for bone fragility as determinants of quantitative ultrasound variables in a nationally representative population sample. Bone. 2009;45(1):119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.03.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82.Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC, Sanders KM, Kotowicz MA. Vitamin D status of women in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study: association with diet and casual exposure to sunlight. Med J Aust 2001;175:401–5. [DOI] [PubMed]
83.Javaid MK, Crozier SR, Harvey NC, Gale CR, Dennison EM, Boucher BJ, Arden NK, Godfrey KM, Cooper C, and the Princess Anne Hospital Study Group. Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and childhood bone mass at age 9 years: longitudinal study. Lancet 2006;367:36–43. [DOI] [PubMed]
84.National Diet and Nutrition Survey. Results from years 1, 2, 3 and 4 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009 – 2011/2012). London: Public Health London; 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/310995/NDNS_Y1_to_4_UK_report.pdf.
85.Rockell J. E. P., Skeaff C. M., Williams S. M., Green T. J. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations of New Zealanders aged 15 years and older. Osteoporosis International. 2006;17(9):1382–1389. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86.Ministry of Health. 2012. Vitamin D status of New Zealand adults: Findings from the 2008/09 New Zealand adult nutrition survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
87.Tran Bich, Armstrong Bruce K., Carlin John B., Ebeling Peter R., English Dallas R., Kimlin Michael G., Rahman Bayzidur, van der Pols Jolieke C., Venn Alison, Gebski Val, Whiteman David C., Webb Penelope M., Neale Rachel E. Recruitment and Results of a Pilot Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation in the General Population of Australia. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2012;97(12):4473–4480. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88.Waterhouse Mary, Tran Bich, Ebeling Peter R., English Dallas R., Lucas Robyn M., Venn Alison J., Webb Penelope M., Whiteman David C., Neale Rachel E. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on selected inflammatory biomarkers in older adults: a secondary analysis of data from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. British Journal of Nutrition. 2015;114(05):693–699. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515002366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89.Australian Health Survey 2011 – 2012 http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4364.0.55.0062011-12?OpenDocument.
90.Hurskainen Anne-Riina, Virtanen Jyrki K., Tuomainen Tomi-Pekka, Nurmi Tarja, Voutilainen Sari. Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D with type 2 diabetes and markers of insulin resistance in a general older population in Finland. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 2012;28(5):418–423. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91.Salminen M, Saaristo P, Salonoja M, Vaapio S, Vahlberg T, Lamberg-Allardt C, Aarnio P, Kivela S-L. Arch Gerontol Geriatric 2015;61:419–24. [DOI] [PubMed]
92.Carlberg Carsten, Seuter Sabine, de Mello Vanessa D. F., Schwab Ursula, Voutilainen Sari, Pulkki Kari, Nurmi Tarja, Virtanen Jyrki, Tuomainen Tomi-Pekka, Uusitupa Matti. Primary Vitamin D Target Genes Allow a Categorization of Possible Benefits of Vitamin D3 Supplementation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e71042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93.Hirani Vasant, Primatesta Paola. Vitamin D concentrations among people aged 65 years and over living in private households and institutions in England: population survey. Age and Ageing. 2005;34(5):485–491. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94.Looker A.C, Dawson-Hughes B, Calvo M.S, Gunter E.W, Sahyoun N.R. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status of adolescents and adults in two seasonal subpopulations from NHANES III. Bone. 2002;30(5):771–777. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00692-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1:^{(313.5KB, docx)}

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information file.

[CR1] 1.Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374:86–89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Bolland MJ, Avenell A, Grey A. Assessment of research waste part 1: an exemplar from examining study design, surrogate and clinical endpoints in studies of calcium intake and vitamin D supplementation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 10.1186/s12874-018-0556-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR3] 3.IOM (Institute of Medicine) Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:1911–1930. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN). Vitamin D and Health. 2016:Available on line at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/537616/SACN_Vitamin_D_and_Health_report.pdf (Accessed 25 July 2016).

[CR6] 6.Lips P. Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:477–501. doi: 10.1210/edrv.22.4.0437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Heaney RP. Guidelines for optimizing design and analysis of clinical studies of nutrient effects. Nutr Rev. 2014;72:48–54. doi: 10.1111/nure.12090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Autier P, Boniol M, Pizot C, Mullie P. Vitamin D status and ill health: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:76–89. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Avenell A, Mak JC, O'Connell D. Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD000227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000227.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Bolland MJ, Grey A, Gamble GD, Reid IR. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:307–320. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70212-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Theodoratou E, Tzoulaki I, Zgaga L, Ioannidis JP. Vitamin D and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. BMJ. 2014;348:g2035. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Lund H, Brunnhuber K, Juhl C, Robinson K, Leenaars M, Dorch BF, et al. Towards evidence based research. BMJ. 2016;355:i5440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.McKenna MJ. Differences in vitamin D status between countries in young adults and the elderly. Am J Med. 1992;93:69–77. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90682-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.van der Wielen RP, Lowik MR, van den Berg H, de Groot LC, Haller J, Moreiras O, et al. Serum vitamin D concentrations among elderly people in Europe. Lancet. 1995;346:207–210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91266-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Hilger J, Friedel A, Herr R, Rausch T, Roos F, Wahl DA, et al. A systematic review of vitamin D status in populations worldwide. Br J Nutr. 2014;111:23–45. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513001840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Spiro A, Buttriss JL. Vitamin D: an overview of vitamin D status and intake in Europe. Nutr Bull. 2014;39:322–350. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Cashman KD, Dowling KG, Skrabakova Z, Gonzalez-Gross M, Valtuena J, De Henauw S, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:1033–1044. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.120873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.IOM (Institute of Medicine) Evaluation of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in chronic disease. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Lips P, Chapuy MC, Dawson-Hughes B, Pols HA, Holick MF. An international comparison of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:394–397. doi: 10.1007/s001980050162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Carter GD, Carter R, Jones J, Berry J. How accurate are assays for 25-hydroxyvitamin D? Data from the international vitamin D external quality assessment scheme. Clin Chem. 2004;50:2195–2197. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.040683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Chapuy MC, Arlot ME, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ. Effect of calcium and cholecalciferol treatment for three years on hip fractures in elderly women. BMJ. 1994;308:1081–1082. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6936.1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Lips P, Graafmans WC, Ooms ME, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM. Vitamin D supplementation and fracture incidence in elderly persons. A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:400–406. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-4-199602150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Meyer HE, Smedshaug GB, Kvaavik E, Falch JA, Tverdal A, Pedersen JI. Can vitamin D supplementation reduce the risk of fracture in the elderly? A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:709–715. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.Larsen ER, Mosekilde L, Foldspang A. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation prevents osteoporotic fractures in elderly community dwelling residents: a pragmatic population-based 3-year intervention study. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:370–378. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.0301240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR25] 25.Lappe J, Cullen D, Haynatzki G, Recker R, Ahlf R, Thompson K. Calcium and vitamin d supplementation decreases incidence of stress fractures in female navy recruits. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:741–749. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Simpson JA, Kotowicz MA, Young D, et al. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303:1815–1822. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Cooper C, Harvey NC, Bishop NJ, Kennedy S, Papageorghiou AT, Schoenmakers I, et al. Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone health (MAVIDOS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:393–402. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00044-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Scragg R, Stewart AW, Waayer D, Lawes CMM, Toop L, Sluyter J, et al. Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular disease in the vitamin D assessment study a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:608–616. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Grant AM, Avenell A, Campbell MK, McDonald AM, MacLennan GS, McPherson GC, et al. Oral vitamin D3 and calcium for secondary prevention of low-trauma fractures in elderly people (randomised evaluation of calcium or vitamin D, RECORD): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1621–1628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63013-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Salovaara K, Tuppurainen M, Karkkainen M, Rikkonen T, Sandini L, Sirola J, et al. Effect of vitamin D(3) and calcium on fracture risk in 65- to 71-year-old women: a population-based 3-year randomized, controlled trial--the OSTPRE-FPS. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:1487–1495. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Lee IM, Cook NR, Albert MA, Gordon D, et al. The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL): rationale and design of a large randomized controlled trial of vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acid supplements for the primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Bassuk SS, Manson JE, Lee IM, Cook NR, Christen WG, Bubes VY, et al. Baseline characteristics of participants in the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;47:235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, Gass M, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(7):669–83. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR34] 34.Law M, Withers H, Morris J, Anderson F. Vitamin D supplementation and the prevention of fractures and falls: results of a randomised trial in elderly people in residential accommodation. Age Ageing. 2006;35:482–486. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afj080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR35] 35.Smith H, Anderson F, Raphael H, Maslin P, Crozier S, Cooper C. Effect of annual intramuscular vitamin D on fracture risk in elderly men and women--a population-based, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1852–1857. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Baron John A., Barry Elizabeth L., Mott Leila A., Rees Judy R., Sandler Robert S., Snover Dale C., Bostick Roberd M., Ivanova Anastasia, Cole Bernard F., Ahnen Dennis J., Beck Gerald J., Bresalier Robert S., Burke Carol A., Church Timothy R., Cruz-Correa Marcia, Figueiredo Jane C., Goodman Michael, Kim Adam S., Robertson Douglas J., Rothstein Richard, Shaukat Aasma, Seabrook March E., Summers Robert W. A Trial of Calcium and Vitamin D for the Prevention of Colorectal Adenomas. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(16):1519–1530. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Trivedi DP, Doll R, Khaw KT. Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;326:469. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Porthouse J, Cockayne S, King C, Saxon L, Steele E, Aspray T, et al. Randomised controlled trial of calcium and supplementation with cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) for prevention of fractures in primary care. BMJ. 2005;330:1003. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.Lyons RA, Johansen A, Brophy S, Newcombe RG, Phillips CJ, Lervy B, et al. Preventing fractures among older people living in institutional care: a pragmatic randomised double blind placebo controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:811–818. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0309-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Gillespie WJ, Henry DA, O'Connell DL, Robertson J. Vitamin D, vitamin D analogues and calcium in prevention of fractures in involutional and postmenopausal osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1996;3:18. [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Autier P, Gandini S. Vitamin D supplementation and Total mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1730–1737. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.16.1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR42] 42.Punthakee Z, Bosch J, Dagenais G, Diaz R, Holman R, Probstfield J, et al. Design, history and results of the thiazolidinedione intervention with vitamin D evaluation (TIDE) randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2012;55:36–45. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2357-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Bolland MJ, Grey A, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Vitamin D supplementation and falls: a trial sequential meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:573–580. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70068-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Brooke O G, Brown I R, Bone C D, Carter N D, Cleeve H J, Maxwell J D, Robinson V P, Winder S M. Vitamin D supplements in pregnant Asian women: effects on calcium status and fetal growth. BMJ. 1980;280(6216):751–754. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6216.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR45] 45.Pfeifer Michael, Begerow Bettina, Minne Helmut W., Abrams Christine, Nachtigall Detlef, Hansen Corinna. Effects of a Short-Term Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Body Sway and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Elderly Women. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2000;15(6):1113–1118. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.6.1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR46] 46.Chapuy M. C., Pamphile R., Paris E., Kempf C., Schlichting M., Arnaud S., Garnero P., Garnero P., Meunier P. J. Combined Calcium and Vitamin D3 Supplementation in Elderly Women: Confirmation of Reversal of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Hip Fracture Risk: The Decalyos II Study. Osteoporosis International. 2002;13(3):257–264. doi: 10.1007/s001980200023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR47] 47.Bischoff Heike A, Stähelin Hannes B, Dick Walter, Akos Regula, Knecht Margrith, Salis Christian, Nebiker Matthias, Theiler Robert, Pfeifer Michael, Begerow Bettina, Lew Robert A, Conzelmann Martin. Effects of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Falls: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2003;18(2):343–351. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.2.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR48] 48.Martineau AR, Timms PM, Bothamley GH, et al. High-dose vitamin D(3) during intensive-phase antimicrobial treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):242–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR49] 49.Mosayebi Ghasem, Ghazavi Ali, Ghasami Keyvan, Jand Yahya, Kokhaei Parviz. Therapeutic Effect of Vitamin D3 in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Immunological Investigations. 2011;40(6):627–639. doi: 10.3109/08820139.2011.573041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR50] 50.Amestejani M, Salehi BS, Vasigh M, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a clinical trial study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11(3):327–30. [PubMed]

[CR51] 51.Schreuder F., Bernsen R. M. D., van der Wouden J. C. Vitamin D Supplementation for Nonspecific Musculoskeletal Pain in Non-Western Immigrants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2012;10(6):547–555. doi: 10.1370/afm.1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR52] 52.Mozaffari-Khosravi Hassan, Nabizade Lale, Yassini-Ardakani Seyed Mojtaba, Hadinedoushan Hossein, Barzegar Kazem. The Effect of 2 Different Single Injections of High Dose of Vitamin D on Improving the Depression in Depressed Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2013;33(3):378–385. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31828f619a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR53] 53.Hossain Nazli, Kanani Fatima H., Ramzan Shabana, Kausar Robina, Ayaz Shabana, Khanani Rafiq, Pal Lubna. Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes of Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation: Results of an Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial of Antenatal Vitamin D Supplementation in Pakistani Women. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2014;99(7):2448–2455. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR54] 54.Bhan I., Dobens D., Tamez H., Deferio J. J., Li Y. C., Warren H. S., Ankers E., Wenger J., Tucker J. K., Trottier C., Pathan F., Kalim S., Nigwekar S. U., Thadhani R. Nutritional Vitamin D Supplementation in Dialysis: A Randomized Trial. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2015;10(4):611–619. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06910714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR55] 55.Jorde R., Sneve M., Figenschau Y., Svartberg J., Waterloo K. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on symptoms of depression in overweight and obese subjects: randomized double blind trial. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2008;264(6):599–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.02008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR56] 56.Wejse Christian, Gomes Victor F., Rabna Paulo, Gustafson Per, Aaby Peter, Lisse Ida M., Andersen Paul L., Glerup Henning, Sodemann Morten. Vitamin D as Supplementary Treatment for Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2009;179(9):843–850. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200804-567OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR57] 57.Rastelli Antonella L., Taylor Marie E., Gao Feng, Armamento-Villareal Reina, Jamalabadi-Majidi Shohreh, Napoli Nicola, Ellis Matthew J. Vitamin D and aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS): a phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2011;129(1):107–116. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1644-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR58] 58.Kjærgaard Marie, Waterloo Knut, Wang Catharina E. A., Almås Bjørg, Figenschau Yngve, Hutchinson Moira S., Svartberg Johan, Jorde Rolf. Effect of vitamin D supplement on depression scores in people with low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D: nested case—control study and randomised clinical trial. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;201(05):360–368. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.104349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR59] 59.Lehouck An, Mathieu Chantal, Carremans Claudia, Baeke Femke, Verhaegen Jan, Van Eldere Johan, Decallonne Brigitte, Bouillon Roger, Decramer Marc, Janssens Wim. High Doses of Vitamin D to Reduce Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2012;156(2):105. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR60] 60.Murdoch David R., Slow Sandy, Chambers Stephen T., Jennings Lance C., Stewart Alistair W., Priest Patricia C., Florkowski Christopher M., Livesey John H., Camargo Carlos A., Scragg Robert. Effect of Vitamin D3Supplementation on Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in Healthy Adults. JAMA. 2012;308(13):1333. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.12505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR61] 61.ABOU-RAYA A., ABOU-RAYA S., HELMII M. The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Inflammatory and Hemostatic Markers and Disease Activity in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2012;40(3):265–272. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR62] 62.McAlindon Timothy, LaValley Michael, Schneider Erica, Nuite Melynn, Lee Ji Yeon, Price Lori Lyn, Lo Grace, Dawson-Hughes Bess. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Progression of Knee Pain and Cartilage Volume Loss in Patients With Symptomatic Osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2013;309(2):155. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.164487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR63] 63.Amrein Karin, Schnedl Christian, Holl Alexander, Riedl Regina, Christopher Kenneth B., Pachler Christoph, Urbanic Purkart Tadeja, Waltensdorfer Andreas, Münch Andreas, Warnkross Helga, Stojakovic Tatjana, Bisping Egbert, Toller Wolfgang, Smolle Karl-Heinz, Berghold Andrea, Pieber Thomas R., Dobnig Harald. Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D3on Hospital Length of Stay in Critically Ill Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency. JAMA. 2014;312(15):1520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR64] 64.Lopez-Torres Hidalgo J, Grupo A. [Effect of calcium and vitamin D in the reduction of falls in the elderly: a randomized trial versus placebo]. Med Clin (Barc). 2014;142(3):95–102. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR65] 65.Tran Bich, Armstrong Bruce K, Ebeling Peter R, English Dallas R, Kimlin Michael G, van der Pols Jolieke C, Venn Alison, Gebski Val, Whiteman David C, Webb Penelope M, Neale Rachel E. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on antibiotic use: a randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2013;99(1):156–161. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.063271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR66] 66.Turner Abigail Norris, Carr Reese Patricia, Fields Karen S., Anderson Julie, Ervin Melissa, Davis John A., Fichorova Raina N., Roberts Mysheika Williams, Klebanoff Mark A., Jackson Rebecca D. A blinded, randomized controlled trial of high-dose vitamin D supplementation to reduce recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;211(5):479.e1-479.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR67] 67.Martineau AR, MacLaughlin BD, Hooper RL, et al. Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial of bolus-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in adults with asthma (ViDiAs). Thorax. 2015;70(5):451–57. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR68] 68.Miskulin DC, Majchrzak K, Tighiouart H, et al. Ergocalciferol Supplementation in Hemodialysis Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR69] 69.Sandoughi Mahnaz, Zakeri Zahra, Mirhosainee Zahra, Mohammadi Mahdi, Shahbakhsh Sogol. The effect of vitamin D on nonspecific low back pain. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases. 2013;18(8):854–858. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR70] 70.Tukvadze Nestan, Sanikidze Ekaterina, Kipiani Maia, Hebbar Gautam, Easley Kirk A, Shenvi Neeta, Kempker Russell R, Frediani Jennifer K, Mirtskhulava Veriko, Alvarez Jessica A, Lomtadze Nino, Vashakidze Lamara, Hao Li, Del Rio Carlos, Tangpricha Vin, Blumberg Henry M, Ziegler Thomas R. High-dose vitamin D3 in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2015;102(5):1059–1069. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.113886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR71] 71.Chapuy M C, Chapuy P, Meunier P J. Calcium and vitamin D supplements: effects on calcium metabolism in elderly people. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1987;46(2):324–328. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/46.2.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR72] 72.Lips P, van Ginkel F C, Jongen M J, Rubertus F, van der Vijgh W J, Netelenbos J C. Determinants of vitamin D status in patients with hip fracture and in elderly control subjects. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1987;46(6):1005–1010. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/46.6.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR73] 73.Löwik M R, Schrijver J, Odink J, van den Berg H, Wedel M, Hermus R J. Nutrition and aging: nutritional status of “apparently healthy” elderly (Dutch nutrition surveillance system) Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 1990;9(1):18–27. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1990.10720345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR74] 74.LIPS P., WIERSINGA A., VAN GINKEL F. C., JONGEN M. J. M., NETELENBOS J. C., HACKENG W. H. L., DELMAS P. D., VAN DER VIJGH W. J. F. The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Vitamin D Status and Parathyroid Function in Elderly Subjects*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1988;67(4):644–650. doi: 10.1210/jcem-67-4-644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR75] 75.Mowe M, Bohmer T, Haug E. Vitamin D-mangel hos eldre sykehusinnlagte og hjemmeboende i Oslo. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1998;118:3929–31. [PubMed]

[CR76] 76.Nes M, Lund-Larsen K, Trygg K, Hoivik HO, Pedersen JI. Nutrition and the elderly in Europe: low prevalence of obesity and biochemical deficiencies in Norwegian subjects. Age Nutr 1993;4:72–81.

[CR77] 77.Finch S, Doyle W, Lowe C, Bates CJ, Prentice A, Smithers G, Clarke PC. National diet and nutrition survey: people aged 65 years and over. London: The Stationery Office; 1998.

[CR78] 78.Lund B., Sørensen O. H. Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum and its relation to sunshine, age and vitamin D intake in the Danish population. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 1979;39(1):23–30. doi: 10.3109/00365517909104935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR79] 79.Schleicher Rosemary L, Sternberg Maya R, Lacher David A, Sempos Christopher T, Looker Anne C, Durazo-Arvizu Ramon A, Yetley Elizabeth A, Chaudhary-Webb Madhulika, Maw Khin L, Pfeiffer Christine M, Johnson Clifford L. The vitamin D status of the US population from 1988 to 2010 using standardized serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D shows recent modest increases. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2016;104(2):454–461. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.127985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR80] 80.Gordon Catherine M., DePeter Kerrin C., Feldman Henry A., Grace Estherann, Emans S. Jean. Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency Among Healthy Adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2004;158(6):531. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.6.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR81] 81.Kauppi Maarit, Impivaara Olli, Mäki Juhani, Heliövaara Markku, Marniemi Jukka, Montonen Jukka, Jula Antti. Vitamin D status and common risk factors for bone fragility as determinants of quantitative ultrasound variables in a nationally representative population sample. Bone. 2009;45(1):119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.03.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR82] 82.Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC, Sanders KM, Kotowicz MA. Vitamin D status of women in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study: association with diet and casual exposure to sunlight. Med J Aust 2001;175:401–5. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR83] 83.Javaid MK, Crozier SR, Harvey NC, Gale CR, Dennison EM, Boucher BJ, Arden NK, Godfrey KM, Cooper C, and the Princess Anne Hospital Study Group. Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and childhood bone mass at age 9 years: longitudinal study. Lancet 2006;367:36–43. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR84] 84.National Diet and Nutrition Survey. Results from years 1, 2, 3 and 4 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009 – 2011/2012). London: Public Health London; 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/310995/NDNS_Y1_to_4_UK_report.pdf.

[CR85] 85.Rockell J. E. P., Skeaff C. M., Williams S. M., Green T. J. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations of New Zealanders aged 15 years and older. Osteoporosis International. 2006;17(9):1382–1389. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR86] 86.Ministry of Health. 2012. Vitamin D status of New Zealand adults: Findings from the 2008/09 New Zealand adult nutrition survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

[CR87] 87.Tran Bich, Armstrong Bruce K., Carlin John B., Ebeling Peter R., English Dallas R., Kimlin Michael G., Rahman Bayzidur, van der Pols Jolieke C., Venn Alison, Gebski Val, Whiteman David C., Webb Penelope M., Neale Rachel E. Recruitment and Results of a Pilot Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation in the General Population of Australia. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2012;97(12):4473–4480. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR88] 88.Waterhouse Mary, Tran Bich, Ebeling Peter R., English Dallas R., Lucas Robyn M., Venn Alison J., Webb Penelope M., Whiteman David C., Neale Rachel E. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on selected inflammatory biomarkers in older adults: a secondary analysis of data from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. British Journal of Nutrition. 2015;114(05):693–699. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515002366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR89] 89.Australian Health Survey 2011 – 2012 http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4364.0.55.0062011-12?OpenDocument.

[CR90] 90.Hurskainen Anne-Riina, Virtanen Jyrki K., Tuomainen Tomi-Pekka, Nurmi Tarja, Voutilainen Sari. Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D with type 2 diabetes and markers of insulin resistance in a general older population in Finland. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 2012;28(5):418–423. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR91] 91.Salminen M, Saaristo P, Salonoja M, Vaapio S, Vahlberg T, Lamberg-Allardt C, Aarnio P, Kivela S-L. Arch Gerontol Geriatric 2015;61:419–24. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR92] 92.Carlberg Carsten, Seuter Sabine, de Mello Vanessa D. F., Schwab Ursula, Voutilainen Sari, Pulkki Kari, Nurmi Tarja, Virtanen Jyrki, Tuomainen Tomi-Pekka, Uusitupa Matti. Primary Vitamin D Target Genes Allow a Categorization of Possible Benefits of Vitamin D3 Supplementation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e71042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR93] 93.Hirani Vasant, Primatesta Paola. Vitamin D concentrations among people aged 65 years and over living in private households and institutions in England: population survey. Age and Ageing. 2005;34(5):485–491. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR94] 94.Looker A.C, Dawson-Hughes B, Calvo M.S, Gunter E.W, Sahyoun N.R. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status of adolescents and adults in two seasonal subpopulations from NHANES III. Bone. 2002;30(5):771–777. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00692-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Assessment of research waste part 2: wrong study populations- an exemplar of baseline vitamin D status of participants in trials of vitamin D supplementation

Mark J Bolland

Andrew Grey

Alison Avenell

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Electronic supplementary material

Background

Methods

Literature searches

Trial classification

Vitamin D status survey data

Analyses

Table 3.

Table 4.

Results

Baseline 25OHD in randomised controlled trials

Fig. 1.

Table 1.

Table 2.

Large randomised controlled trials and prior 25OHD surveys

Large randomised controlled trials and citation of prior systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

Discussion

Conclusions

Additional file

Acknowledgements

Funding

Availability of data and materials

Abbreviations

Authors’ contributions

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Contributor Information

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases