Skip to main content
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine logoLink to Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
. 2016 Aug 5;13(4):364–374. doi: 10.1007/s13770-016-9047-8

The effect of polyurethane scaffold surface treatments on the adhesion of chondrocytes subjected to interstitial perfusion culture

Manuela Teresa Raimondi 1,5,, Serena Bertoldi 1,2, Silvia Caddeo 3, Silvia Farè 1,2, Chiara Arrigoni 4, Matteo Moretti 4
PMCID: PMC6171542  PMID: 30603418

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure chondrocytes detachment from cellularized constructs cultured in a perfusion bioreactor, and to evaluate the effect of different scaffold coatings on cell adhesion under a fixed flow rate. The scaffolds were polyurethane foams, treated to promote cell attachment and seeded with human chondrocytes. In a preliminary static culture experiment, the scaffolds were imbibed with fetal bovine serum (FBS) and then cultured for 4 weeks. To quantify cell detachment, the number of detached cells from the scaffold treated with FBS was estimated under different interstitial perfusion flow rates and shear stress levels (0.005 mL/min equivalent to 0.05 mPa, 0.023 mL/min equivalent to 0.23 mPa, and 0.045 mL/min equivalent to 0.45 mPa). Finally, groups of scaffolds differently treated (FBS, plasma plus FBS, plasma plus collagen type I) were cultured under a fixed perfusion rate of 0.009 mL/min, equivalent to a shear stress of 0.09 mPa, and the detached cells were counted. Static cultivation showed that cell proliferation increased with time and matrix biosynthesis decreased after the first week of culture. Perfused culture showed that the number of detached cells increased with the perfusion rate on FBS-treated constructs. The plasma-treated/collagen-coated scaffolds showed the highest resistance to cell detachment. To minimize cell detachment, the perfusion rate must be maintained in the order of 0.02 mL/min, giving a shear stress of 0.2 mPa. Our set-up allowed estimating the resistance to cell detachment under interstitial perfusion in a repeatable manner, to test other scaffold coatings and cell types.

Key Words: Tissue engineering, Perfusion, Bioreactor, Scaffold, Polyurethane, Plasma coating

References

  • 1.Yang F, Elisseeff JH. Cartilage Tissue Engineering. In: Bronzino JD, Peterson DR, editors. Tissue Engineering And Artificial Organs. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brittberg M, Lindahl A, et al. Tissue engineering of cartilage. In: van Blitterswijk C, Thomsen P, Lindahl A, Hubbell J, Williams DF, Cancedda R, et al., editors. Tissue Engineering. Cambridge: Academic press; 2008. pp. 533–557. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alvarez-Barreto JF, Sikavitsas VI. Tissue Engineering Bioreactors. In: Bronzino JD, Peterson DR, editors. Tissue Engineering And Artificial Organs. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Asnaghi MA, Candiani G, Farè S, Fiore GB, Petrini P, Raimondi MT, et al. Trends in biomedical engineering: focus on regenerative medicine. J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2011;9:73–86. doi: 10.5301/JABB.2011.8562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wendt D, Timmins N, Malda J, Janssen F, Ratcliffe A, Vunjak-Novakovic G, et al. et al. Bioreactors for tissue engineering. In: van Blitterswijk C, Thomsen P, Lindahl A, Hubbell J, Williams DF, Cancedda R, et al.et al., editors. Tissue Engineering. Cambridge: Academic press; 2008. pp. 483–506. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nukavarapu SP, Dorcemus DL. Osteochondral tissue engineering: current strategies and challenges. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:706–721. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Correia V, Panadero JA, Ribeiro C, Sencadas V, Rocha JG, Gomez Ribelles JL, et al. Design and validation of a biomechanical bioreactor for cartilage tissue culture. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2016;15:471–478. doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0698-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Partap S, Plunkett NA, O’Brien FJ. Bioreactors in Tissue Engineering. In: Eberli D, editor. Tissue Engineering. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McCoy RJ, Jungreuthmayer C, O’Brien FJ. Influence of flow rate and scaffold pore size on cell behavior during mechanical stimulation in a flow perfusion bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:1583–1594. doi: 10.1002/bit.24424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McCoy RJ, O’Brien FJ. Visualizing feasible operating ranges within tissue engineering systems using a “windows of operation” approach: a perfusion-scaffold bioreactor case study. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:3161–3171. doi: 10.1002/bit.24566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu D, Chua CK, Leong KF. Impact of short-term perfusion on cell retention for 3D bioconstruct development. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101:647–652. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bacáková L, Filová E, Rypácek F, Svorcík V, Starý V. Cell adhesion on artificial materials for tissue engineering. Physiol Res. 2004;53(1):S35–S45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kon E, Filardo G, Zaffagnini S D, Martino A, Di Matteo B M, Muccioli GM, et al. Biodegradable polyurethane meniscal scaffold for isolated partial lesions or as combined procedure for knees with multiple comorbidities: clinical results at 2 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:128–134. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2328-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tsai MC, Hung KC, Hung SC, Hsu SH. Evaluation of biodegradable elastic scaffolds made of anionic polyurethane for cartilage tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;125:34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bax DV, Kondyurin A, Waterhouse A, McKenzie DR, Weiss AS, Bilek MM. Surface plasma modification and tropoelastin coating of a polyurethane co-polymer for enhanced cell attachment and reduced thrombogenicity. Biomaterials. 2014;35:6797–6809. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ, Little DG, Schindeler A. Cell-scaffold interactions in the bone tissue engineering triad. Eur Cell Mater. 2013;26:120–132. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v026a09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ragetly G, Griffon DJ, Chung YS. The effect of type II collagen coating of chitosan fibrous scaffolds on mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and chondrogenesis. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3988–3997. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Perdisa F, Filardo G, Di Matteo B, Marcacci M, Kon E. Platelet rich plasma: a valid augmentation for cartilage scaffolds? A systematic review. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29:805–814. doi: 10.14670/HH-29.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shinto H, Hirata T, Fukasawa T, Fujii S, Maeda H, Okada M, et al. Effect of interfacial serum proteins on melanoma cell adhesion to biodegradable poly(l-lactic acid) microspheres coated with hydroxyapatite. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;108:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Weszl M, Skaliczki G, Cselenyák A, Kiss L, Major T, Schandl K, et al. Freeze-dried human serum albumin improves the adherence and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells on mineralized human bone allografts. J Orthop Res. 2012;30:489–496. doi: 10.1002/jor.21527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rutgers M, Saris DB, Vonk LA, van Rijen MH, Akrum V, Langeveld D, et al. Effect of collagen type I or type II on chondrogenesis by cultured human articular chondrocytes. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19:59–65. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen CH, Lee MY, Shyu VB, Chen YC, Chen CT, Chen JP. Surface modification of polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;40:389–397. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bertoldi S, Farè S, Denegri M, Rossi D, Haugen HJ, Parolini O, et al. Ability of polyurethane foams to support placenta-derived cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation: preliminary results. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:1005–1011. doi: 10.1007/s10856-009-3953-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zanetta M, Quirici N, Demarosi F, Tanzi MC, Rimondini L, Farè S. Ability of polyurethane foams to support cell proliferation and the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1126–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Laganà M, Arrigoni C, Lopa S, Sansone V, Zagra L, Moretti M, et al. Characterization of articular chondrocytes isolated from 211 osteoarthritic patients. Cell Tissue Bank. 2014;15:59–66. doi: 10.1007/s10561-013-9371-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guelcher SA. Biodegradable polyurethanes: synthesis and applications in regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2008;14:3–17. doi: 10.1089/teb.2007.0133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bil M, Ryszkowska J, Wozniak P, Kurzydlowski KJ, Lewandowska-Szumiel M. Optimization of the structure of polyurethanes for bone tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2501–2510. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guelcher S, Srinivasan A, Hafeman A, Gallagher K, Doctor J, Khetan S, et al. Synthesis, in vitro degradation, and mechanical properties of two-component poly(ester urethane)urea scaffolds: effects of water and polyol composition. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:2321–2333. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.0395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fassina L, Visai L, Benazzo F, Benedetti L, Calligaro A, De Angelis MG, et al. Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on calcified matrix production by SAOS-2 cells over a polyurethane porous scaffold. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:1985–1999. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bertoldi S, Farè S, Moscatelli M, Addis A, Vitari F, Domeneghini C, et al. In vivo biodegradation of polyurethane foams in the rat animal model. In: Ravaglioli A, Krajewski A, et al., editors. Nanotechnology for functional repair and regenerative medicine. 2007. pp. 120–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bae JS, Seo EJ, Kang IK. Synthesis and characterization of heparinized polyurethanes using plasma glow discharge. Biomaterials. 1999;20:529–537. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00204-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Raimondi MT, Boschetti F, Migliavacca F, Cioffi M, Dubini G. Micro Fluid Dynamics in Three-Dimensional Engineered Cell Systems in Bioreactors. In: Ashammakhi NA, Reis RL, editors. Topics in Tissue Engineering. Oulu: Tampere University of Technology Press; 2005. pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chlupáč J, Filová E, Riedel T, Houska M, Brynda E, Remy-Zolghadri M, et al. Attachment of human endothelial cells to polyester vascular grafts: pre-coating with adhesive protein assemblies and resistance to short-term shear stress. Physiol Res. 2014;63:167–177. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.932577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES