Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2018 Jul 30;7:1151. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15642.1

Extraction, purification, and activity of protease from the leaves of Moringa oleifera

Swarnali Banik 1, Shrutidhara Biswas 2, Srabani Karmakar 1,a
PMCID: PMC6171725  PMID: 30345026

Abstract

Background: Proteases cleave proteins, thereby providing essential amino acids for protein synthesis, and degrade misfolded and damaged proteins to maintain homeostasis. Proteases also serve as signaling molecules, therapeutic agents and find wide applications in biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry.  Plant-derived proteases are suitable for many biomedical applications due to their easy availability and activity over a wide range of pH, temperature, and substrates. Moringa oleifera Lam (Moringaceae) is a very common food plant with medicinal property and geographically distributed in tropical countries. Here, we isolate proteases from the leaves of Moringa oleifera and characterize its enzymatic activity.

Methods: Proteases were isolated from the aqueous leaf extract of Moringa oleifera by ammonium sulfate precipitation and purified by ion exchange chromatography. Subsequently, the enzyme kinetics was determined using casein as a substrate and calibrated over different pH and temperature range for maximal activity.

Results: We obtained purified fraction of the protease having a molecular weight of 51 kDa. We observed that for the maximal caseinolytic activity of the protease, a pH of 8 and temperature of 37ºC was found to be most effective.

Conclusion: The plant-derived proteolytic enzymes are finding increasing clinical and industrial applications. We could extract, purify and characterize the enzymatic activity of proteases from the leaves of Moringa oleifera. Further molecular characterization, substrate specificity and activity of the extracted protease are required for determining its suitability as a proteolytic enzyme for various applications.

Keywords: Casein, Enzyme activity, Leaf extract, Moringa Oleifera, Plant-derived proteases, Protein purification.

Introduction

All organisms contain proteases that hydrolyze peptide bonds in order to maintain systemic homeostasis and for its normal growth and development 1, 2. Proteases derived from plants, animals and microbes find wide industrial applications including in the leather, food, brewery and pharmaceutical industry 24 corresponding to approximately 60% of the total worldwide enzyme sales 5.

Moringa oleifera is one of the best known medicinal plants widely distributed in the tropical regions 6. It contains a mixture of several hydrolytic enzymes, in which proteases are the key enzymes reported to show pharmacological activity 7. We attempted to investigate the protease activity of aqueous extracts of Moringa oleifera leaf. Here, we have isolated and purified the protease from Moringa leaves and carried out enzyme kinetics study and find that the protease exhibited optimal caseinolytic activity in alkaline pH.

Methods

Preparation of crude enzyme extract

Mature Moringa Oleifera leaves were collected from a plant located near TIU campus, Salt Lake Kolkata and crushed along with 20mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) and 0.1% tween 20 detergent and protease cocktail inhibitor followed by centrifugation with plastocraft table top refrigerated centrifuge machine (Rota 4RV/FM) at 10000 rpm for 10 mins at 4°C. The crude soup was mixed with 40% ammonium sulphate to obtain the protein precipitate, which was then dissolved in 20 mM tris buffer for further evaluation.

Determination of protein content

The total protein content of the solutions at different stages of protein purification was determined by Bradford methods 8 using Sigma’s Bradford reagent (B6916). In this assay, a series of BSA standard solutions (0.1 – 1.2mg/ml) were used to prepare the standard curve. Bradford assay was performed by adding 1 mL of Bradford reagent to 20 μl of each standard solutions or unknown solution, and homogenized by using vortex mixer. The samples were incubated in dark conditions for 10 minutes and the absorbance was read at 595 nm.

SDS PAGE

We performed sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) using 12% resolving and 5% stacking gels for separating proteins. We followed the Laemmli’s method 9 for gel electrophoresis. The samples were mixed with equal volume of gel loading buffer and heated at 95°C in dry heating bath for 2 mins. The electrophoresis process was run with 90 V for first 10 mins and then run at 150 V with Biorad mini protean gel electrophoresis system. After complete run the gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. We have used protein marker (10kD to 250 kD) from GCC biotech (Pre-stained protein marker GCR-P4B) for determination of molecular weight. We imaged the gels in Biorad gel documentation system. Acrylamide, bis acrylamide, Tris and TEMED (T9281) are from Sigma Aldrich. Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250 (93473) and Ammonium per sulphate (28575) was from SRL (Sisco Research Laboratories).

Purification of protein

Dialysis: The pellet dissolved in Tris buffer as obtained above was then dialyzed in 3.5cm/ml dialysis tubing (SIGMA Aldrich D6066 overnight in a magnetic stirrer by immersing the tubing in a buffer containing Tris (pH 8) and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) SRL, which was repeated thrice for complete exchange of buffer.

Diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) cellulose ion exchange chromatography: The protein sample was loaded in the DEAE cellulose (SIGMA Aldrich 30477) column. Ion exchange column chromatography was carried out by using an assembly of Biorad’s Econo pump model EP-1, UV monitor and chart recorder from Atto, Japan and Biorad’s fraction collector model 2110. A gradient of 0.05 M to 0.5 M NaCl was used to elute the protein from the column. The gradient was run for 150 min with a flow rate of 1ml/min. Optical density (OD) of all the fractions were taken at 280 nm with Schimadzu 2401 UV Vis Spectrophotometer.

Bovine serum albumin (BSA) digestion

Samples at different stages of purification were tested for albuminolytic property of protease by using BSA SIGMA as substrate. BSA digestion was performed at 37°C and pH 7.5 for 1 hour. Further, each of the samples were mixed with protein gel loading dye in 1:1 ratio and loaded in SDS PAGE and the gel was imaged with Biorad gel documentation system.

Protease activity assay

In this assay, β-casein was used as substrate. If protease digests casein, the amino acid tyrosine is liberated along with other peptide fragments. Folin’s reagent reacts with free tyrosine to generate a blue colored product, which is quantifiable and measured as an absorbance value on the Schimadzu UV 2401 spectrophotometer at 660 nm. A tyrosine standard calibration curve is constructed to determine the amount of tyrosine released after the proteolytic activity. A series of tyrosine standard solutions at different concentrations (5 – 50 μg/mL) were prepared from the 0.18mg/mL L-tyrosine stock solution with deionized water. L-tyrosine was purchased from Himedia, Fohlin’s reagent was obtained from SRL and β-casein from SIGMA.

Effect of pH & temperature on the protease activity

We have assayed the protease activity in terms of caseinolytic activity with plant leaf extracts at different stages of purification (crude soup is the initial supernatant after homogenization and centrifugation, 40% ammonium soup is the phosphate dissolved pellet after 40% ammonium sulphate fractionation and pooled soup is the final collection of pure fractions came from DEAE cellulose column). All the three samples were dialysed to remove protease inhibitor and EDTA before the protease assay. The protease activity of pure protein was examined at different pH range 4–9 and temperature range 4–70°C.

Enzyme kinetics assay at different β-casein concentration

The enzyme activity assay for protease was conducted with different concentrations of β-casein as substrate, at pH-8 in 37°C respective optimum conditions as determined with the previous experiments described above (optimum temperature and pH conditions). Here the substrate concentration (β-casein) varied in the range (0.81, 1.6, 2.4, 4.03, 5.2) mg/ml keeping the enzyme concentration fixed.

Results

Moringa oleifera leaves are reported to contain protease but there are no detailed studies on the purification and kinetic parameters of the enzyme. Here, we obtain partially purified protease from the aqueous extract of the leaves by ion exchange chromatography such that in anion exchange the proteins show a peak at 280 nm implying a positively charged protein.

Purification of protease

The protein concentration from mature Moringa oleifera leaves at various stages of purification is shown in Table 1, which was purified by DEAE cellulose ion exchange column chromatography. The chromatogram for purification is shown in Figure 1A. The purified fractions were observed in 12% SDS PAGE ( Figure 1B). The protein was of 51 kDa according to molecular weight markers.

Table 1. Total protein content in different stages of purification.

Samples Protein
concentration(mg/ml)
Crude 0.56
40% 0.55
Pooled 0.22

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A. Chromatogram for the purification of protein from Moringa oleifera shows the elution time versus absorbance at 280 nm and the corresponding NaCl gradient profile (ranging from 0.04M to 0.25M) for maximal elution B. SDS PAGE of the crude extract and fractions after purification by DEAE cellulose ion exchange chromatography. Lane 1 shows extract after 40% ammonium sulphate precipitation, lane 2 shows the prestained molecular weight marker from GCC biotech marking 140, 100, 91, 71, 51, 25 and 10 kDa bands, lanes 3 to 8 represent fractions after column purification, lanes 9 and10 show the bands from crude leaf extract.

BSA digestion and SDS PAGE

Results from Figure 2 shows that both crude extract and 40% ammonium sulfate fractionated sample possesses protease activity and is able to produce fragments of BSA (lane 5, 6 and 9).

Figure 2. SDS PAGE showing BSA fragmentation by Moringa oleifera crude enzyme with trypsin as positive control.

Figure 2.

Lane 1 is BSA and trypsin, lane 2 is BSA + trypsin + PMSF, lane 3 is BSA, lane 4 is BSA +40% Ammonium Sulphate cut + PMSF, lane 5 is BSA + 40% Ammonium Sulphate cut, lane 6 is BSA + Pooled pure protein, lane 7 is BSA, lane 8 is prestained molecular weight marker from GCC biotech showing 140, 100, 91, 71, 51, 25 and 10 kDa bands and lane 9 is BSA + crude leaf extract.

Biophysical characterization of the protease

UV-vis absorption spectra of the pure protease were shown in Figure 3. A single peak at 280 nm can be observed for the pure protein.

Figure 3. UV-Vis absorbance spectra from (230 nm to 400 nm) of the purified protein from Moringa oleifera leaf extract is shown.

Figure 3.

Effect of pH on protease activity with β-casein as substrate

In both crude extract and purified protein, protease activity was measured as described in methods. Reactions in different pH 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 were done ( Figure 4). The results showed maximum activity at the pH 8.0. Therefore, the enzyme is an alkaline protease.

Figure 4. Effect of pH on the caseinolytic property of the protease.

Figure 4.

Protease activity of the pooled pure fractions on β-casein degradation is plotted against different pH (4, 5, 6, 7 and 8) at 37ºC. Free tyrosine liberated due to β-casein degradation was monitored with Folin-Ciocalteau reagent at 660 nm and the corresponding amount was measured from the tyrosine standard curve.

Effect of temperature on protease activity with β-casein as substrate.

The protease assay with β-casein as substrate was performed at a range of temperatures; 4°C, 25°C 37°C, 55°C and 70°C ( Figure 5) according to the methods described above. The enzyme activity was found to be maximum at 37°C.

Figure 5. Effect of temperature on the caseinolytic property of the protease.

Figure 5.

Protease activity of the pooled pure fractions on β-casein degradation is plotted against different temperature (4, 25, 37, 55 and 70°C) at pH 8. Free tyrosine liberated due to β-casein degradation was measured as described earlier.

Enzyme kinetics

Specific activity of the protease was calculated by enzyme activity from the protease assay using β-casein as substrate and the total protein content of the protease solution. We can see a large increase in specific activity after the final purification ( Figure 6).

Figure 6. Comparison of specific activity of crude extract, 40% ammonium sulfate fraction and purified protease at optimum pH 8 and optimum temperature 37ºC is represented as a bar diagram.

Figure 6.

Free tyrosine liberated due to β-casein degradation was measured as described earlier. Enzyme activity present per amount of enzyme is calculated as specific activity of the protease.

We have seen increasing protease activity in the initial substrate concentration range and then saturation of protease activity above concentration of 4.03 mg/ml β-casein ( Figure 7). The graph as a result follows conventional Michaelis Menten kinetics. We calculated K M and V max from the corresponding double reciprocal plot i.e. Lineweaver Burk plot as shown in the inset graph ( Table 2). K M is 5.47 mg/ml and V max is 588.23 μM/min.

Figure 7. Protease activity with different β- casein concentrations is plotted to get Michaelis Menten curve and the double reciprocal plot (1/substrate concentration versus 1/ enzyme activity) is shown on the inset.

Figure 7.

K M and V max obtained from the double reciprocal plot are 5.47 mg/ml and 588.23 µM/min respectively.

Table 2. K M and Vmax from enzyme kinetics.

KM mg/ml Vmax µM/min
5.47 588.235
Enzyme kinetics data

Zip file containing underlying data of all enzyme activity assays with raw gel images

Copyright: © 2018 Banik S et al.

Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Discussion

Our study concludes that mature leaves from Moringa oleifera contains a protease with an approximate molecular weight of 51kD, with an optimum temperature of 37°C and optimum pH of 8.0 for its caseinolytic property. This is the first report of purification of a protease from Moringa oleifera to our knowledge. Further determination of molecular characterization, substrate specificity and activity of the protease are required to determine its suitability for industrial applications.

Data availability

The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: © 2018 Banik S et al.

Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Dataset 1: Enzyme kinetics data. Zip file containing underlying data of all enzyme activity assays with raw gel images 10.5256/f1000research.15642.d212249

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Mr Dipak Chandra Konar of Department of Chemistry, Bose Institute, for his help in using the protein purification set up, and spectrophotometric assays. Special thanks go to Prof. K. P Das, Bose Institute, for his support in this project.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; referees: 2 approved

References

  • 1. López-Otín C, Overall CM: Protease degradomics: a new challenge for proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3(7):509–519. 10.1038/nrm858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Turk B: Targeting proteases: successes, failures and future prospects. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5(9):785–799. 10.1038/nrd2092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Li Q, Yi L, Marek P, et al. : Commercial proteases: present and future. FEBS Lett. 2013;587(8):1155–1163. 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. López-Otín C, Bond JS: Proteases: multifunctional enzymes in life and disease. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(45):30433–30437. 10.1074/jbc.R800035200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Li S, Yang X, Yang S, et al. : Technology prospecting on enzymes: application, marketing and engineering. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2012;2(3):e201209017. 10.5936/csbj.201209017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Stohs SJ, Hartman MJ: Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Moringa oleifera. Phytother Res. 2015;29(6):796–804. 10.1002/ptr.5325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Satish A, Sairam S, Ahmed F, et al. : Moringa oleifera Lam.: Protease activity against blood coagulation cascade. Pharmacognosy Res. 2012;4(1):44–49. 10.4103/0974-8490.91034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227(5259):680–5. 10.1038/227680a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Banik S, Biswas S, Karmakar S: Dataset 1 in: Extraction, purification, and activity of protease from the leaves of Moringa oleifera. F1000Research. 2018. 10.5256/f1000research.15642.d212249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2018 Sep 25. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.17067.r36602

Referee response for version 1

Somsubhra Nath 1

The manuscript by Banik et al. describes the isolation and further characterization of protease activity of partially purified protein fraction from the leaves of Moringa oleifera. The manuscript is well-written with detailed description of materials, methods and results. It, indeed, identified the protease activity with sufficient detailing. It has the potential for future investigation of biochemical characterization and functional relevance of this plant derived protease.

However, there are a few concerns, as pointed below:

  1. In Figure 2, it is apparent that the first lane is not a part of original figure. Adding a separate lane in an otherwise complete picture is not accepted. A repeat experiment with all the lanes is suggested.

  2. The referencing requires to be more elaborate.

  3. The discussion should describe potential application of the findings, based on literature review.

Addressing these issues will strengthen the acceptability of the finding described in this manuscript.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2018 Sep 18. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.17067.r38435

Referee response for version 1

Sujit Roy 1

The article entitled ‘ Extraction, purification, and activity of protease from the leaves of  Moringa oleifera’ by Banik et al. appears to be an interesting topic related to purification of protease from an economically and medicinally important plant species Moringa oleifera.

Overall, the manuscript is well composed, the background and objectives of the study has been mentioned clearly and also justified. The introduction part also appropriately reviews some of the relevant information. The results are sound and explained properly and supported with further explanation in the Discussion part. Therefore, in summary, I’m recommending acceptance and publication of this article.   

However, for future research interest, the introduction section could have been more extensive, indicating relevant information from recent past and current studies for getting meaningful insight into the background of this research as well as the lacunae which motivated to set the objectives for carrying out this study.

The methods part is quite sufficient. However, for the purification part, describing the isolation of the indicated protease activity from Moringa leaf extracts may be more extensive and apart from Coomassie blue staining, quality of purification may be assessed by silver staining procedure to compare the results and enrichment of purification after the column chromatographic techniques.

Finally, a discussion section may be included to compare and discuss the findings in light of the related research. In concluding note, application and future research possibilities using the gained knowledge and information may be mentioned.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2018 Sep 18. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.17067.r38180

Referee response for version 1

Rajat Banerjee 1, Priyanka Biswas 2

The research article entitled “Extraction, purification, and activity of protease from the leaves of  Moringa oleifera by Banik S, Biswas S and Karmakar S” explains the extraction, purification and activity of a protease that has been isolated from the leaves of the plant Moringa oleifera. The work is unique and can be of great applications since Moringa oleifera is reported to have various medicinal properties.

This work may be recommended for indexing only after incorporation of a few changes listed as follows:

Major Revision:

  1. Figure 2 – Lane numbers are missing; Marker positioning wrong; data of BSA+POOLED+PMSF and BSA+CRUDE+PMSF missing. Try to include these data for a better clarification to the readers.

  2. Figure 4 – What happens after pH 8, is not reflected in the graph? Then how can this be concluded as optimum pH? A range of pH 4 – 12 at least, would be better for any such conclusion.

  3. Figure 5 – The data points are very scattered. More data points must be included in the graph for proper conclusion, especially between 25°C and 37°C and 37°C and 55°C.

  4. Figure 7 – This is very confusing. The graph does not look like a Michaelis – Menten graph. Number of data points must be increased. K m is outside the substrate concentration range taken in the graph. K m is usually expressed in units of μM or mM and not mg/ml. The Lineweaver-Burk plot is also erroneous. If the linear line is extrapolated backwards, it will give a negative y-intercept, i.e., a negative 1/V max value. The V max values obtained by the authors can neither be correlated to the Michaelis – Menten graph nor to the Lineweaver-Burk plot. Then how is this value obtained?

Minor Revision:

  1. Under the Methods section, in Preparation of crude extract and Purification of protein, the authors have used “Tris” buffer. It is usually written as Tris-HCl buffer. Moreover, under the two above mentioned sub-headings, somewhere the pH of the buffer is missing and elsewhere its concentration. Clear information should be provided.

  2. Under the Enzyme kinetics assay, it is written “keeping the enzyme concentration fixed”. The concentration used must be specified.

  3. Figure 1B – is a bit confusing. Marker should be preferably loaded into any of the side lanes. AS 40% pellet also has multiple bands, quite similar to the ladder. If possible, change the gel picture with proper loading arrangement and labelling.

  4. Figure 3 – The peak at 280 nm is quite blunt and the 260/280 ratio is close to 1, suggesting the presence of impurities. Purer fractions must be used.

  5. Figure 6 – There is no need to write “Moringa samples” in the X-axis title. Instead, it should be mentioned in the figure legend as “Samples from Moringa oleifera”.

  6. Why is this paper cited as a reference as well? Can this be done? Details about the datasheet is provided in the manuscript itself, after conclusion.

We have read this submission. We believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Enzyme kinetics data

    Zip file containing underlying data of all enzyme activity assays with raw gel images

    Copyright: © 2018 Banik S et al.

    Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

    Data Availability Statement

    The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: © 2018 Banik S et al.

    Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Dataset 1: Enzyme kinetics data. Zip file containing underlying data of all enzyme activity assays with raw gel images 10.5256/f1000research.15642.d212249


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES