Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2018 Sep 24;20:1975–1983. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.057

Collated data of mutation frequencies and associated genetic variants of bedaquiline, clofazimine and linezolid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

N Ismail a, SV Omar b, NA Ismail a,b, RPH Peters a,c,
PMCID: PMC6172430  PMID: 30306102

Abstract

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to obtain previously published resistance associated mutations for bedaquiline, clofazimine and linezolid for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Where possible, mutation frequencies for these three drugs were also identified. This catalog of previously published mutations could serve as a reference for comparing mutations associated with either in vitro or clinical resistant mutants. The usage of these data was seen in our study relating to approaches for resistance mutant creation (in vitro approaches for generation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants resistant to bedaquiline, clofazimine or linezolid and identification of associated genetic variants (Ismail et al., 2018 in press). Previously published mutations for clofazimine were described in the rv0678 and rv1979c genes, for bedaquiline in atpE, rv0678 and rv2535c (pepQ) genes and for linezolid in the rplC and rrl genes.


Specifications table

Subject area Biology
More specific subject area Microbiology
Type of data Tables
How data was acquired Literature search for mutation frequencies and genetic variants related to bedaquiline, clofazimine and linezolid resistance
Data format Filtered
Experimental factors Published articles regarding bedaquiline, clofazimine and linezolid resistant isolates and associated mutations
Experimental features Previously published mutations in rv0678, rv1979c, rv2535c, atpE, rplC and rrl genes and mutation frequencies associated with either bedaquiline-, clofazimine- or linezolid-resistant M. tuberculosis
Data source location South Africa
Data accessibility Data is included in this article and accessible in related referenced articles
Related research article Ismail, N., Omar, S.V., Ismail, N.A., Peters, R.P.H. (2018). in vitro approaches for generation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants resistant to bedaquiline, clofazimine or linezolid and identification of associated genetic variants, JMM (In press)

Value of the data

  • The data pertaining to genetic variants for bedaquiline, clofazimine and linezolid resistance are vital for understanding drug mechanisms of action.

  • A catalog such as this may prevent data replication and serve as a comparator or reference for other studies related to resistance-associated mutation.

  • The combined data of the resistance-associated variants could provide a starting point for the design of molecular susceptibility tests.

1. Data

The data in this article includes previously published mutations identified in both in vitro (Tables 1 and 3) as well as clinical isolates (Tables 2 and 4) associated with bedaquiline, clofazimine or linezolid resistance. Data were filtered according to the type of mutation identified and the gene in which the mutation occurred. Where available the in vitro approach used to generate the mutant, any information around the strain the mutants were derived from, the mutant MIC value as well as the article from which the data was derived from were included in the data. As bedaquiline- and clofazimine-resistant isolates tend to harbor rv0678 mutations, data for these mutants were presented together. The final data table (Table 5) describes previously published mutation frequencies. A diversity of mutations were identified in the rv0678 gene and were scattered along the gene. For the atpE gene, hotspots have been identified at positions 28 and 63. Mutations in the rplC and rrl target genes appear to be associated with either high or low-level linezolid resistance respectively. Four mutations in rv2535c were identified in in vivo bedaquiline and clofazimine resistant isolates. Rv1979c mutations were found in clinical pre-XDR and XDR isolates.

Table 1.

Catalog of previously published mutations from bedaquiline- and clofazimine-resistant in vitro and in vivo isolates.

Mutation
Approach Notes MIC (µg/mL)
Refs.
rv0678 atpE rv2535c BDQ CFZ
G187C Serial Passage Fully susceptible strain >8 [1]
T461C A83G Isoniazid-resistant strain >8
201_206del A83C Kanamycin-resistant strain >8
G183T Pyrazinamide-resistant strain >8
A83G
A63T A83G Rifampicin-resistant strain >8
G74A Fully susceptible strain 4
T131C Isoniazid-resistant strain >4
T407C Kanamycin-resistant strain 4
C204A Pyrazinamide-resistant strain >4
T131C Rifampicin-resistant strain 4
A83T Spontaneous Fully susceptible strain >8
C403G Pyrazinamide-resistant strain 4
A83G Pyrazinamide-resistant strain 8
G187C Pyrazinamide-resistant strain >8
193delG Fully susceptible strain 2
193delG Fully susceptible strain 4
A65T Fully susceptible strain 4
T407C Pyrazinamide-resistant strain 1
C214T Pyrazinamide-resistant strain 2
G137A Pyrazinamide-resistant strain 4
A97G
CinArg271 in vivo Mice treated with BDQ only 0.12 0.5-1 [2]
+CinAla14 Mice treated with BDQ and CFZ 0.12
+CinAla14 0.12
L44P 0.12
A413G WT in vitro mutants Mutants derived from H37Rv 0.25 [3], [5]
G281A WT 0.5
A202G WT Mutants derived from MDR M. tuberculosis clinical strain 0.5
Ins G 192-193 I66M 4
IS6110 nt 272 WT 1
Ins A 38–39 WT 1
A95T Mutagenesis M. smegmatis [4], [5]
C198G Spontaneous M. tuberculosis [6]
G187C
G183T Spontaneous 2 isolates from MDR strain 0.24–0.48 [7]
G187C 3 isolates from MDR strain 0.9–3.84
A83T 1 isolate from MDR strain 0.48
C198G 1 isolate from MDR strain 0.48
A83G 1 isolate from WT strain 0.3
G183T 3 isolates from WT strain 0.48–0.96
G187C 4 isolates from WT strain 0.24–0.9
G187C Spontaneous 4–8x MIC [8]
A95T 4–8x MIC
C189A Spontaneous 0.5 1.25 [9]
C400T 0.5 1.25
G193 deletion Spontaneous 23 isolates All ≤1 [10]
G193 insertion 21 isolates
C466T 11 isolates
C364 insertion 5 isolates
A202G 5 isolates
T2C 2 isolates
G58T 1 isolate
C107T 1 isolate
G125A 1 isolate
T29 insertion 1 isolate
C98A 1 isolate
T128G 1 isolate
G137A 2 isolate
A152G 1 isolate
C158T 1 isolate
C176T 1 isolate
G188A 1 isolate
G194A 2 isolates
G197T 1 isolate
C226T 1 isolate
C251A 1 isolate
G266T 1 isolate
G269C 1 isolate
A292 deletion 1 isolate
G304A 1 isolate
C305T 2 isolates
T341C 1 isolate
T365C 1 isolate
CGCTGGGC371–378 deletion 1 isolate
CG444–445 deletion 1 isolate
G193 insertion 1 isolate
3 isolates
G265T 1 isolate
A63P Mutants from H37Rv reference strain 4 [11]
D28G Mutants from M. tuberculosis clinical isolates 0.5
E61D 0.5
L59V 0.25
I66M 1

Mutations described in rv0678, atpE and rv2535c genes. A dash (–) is used to indicate where no data is available. WT-wild type, no variants detected. BDQ-Bedaquiline. CFZ-Clofazimine.

Table 3.

Catalog of previously published mutations from linezolid-resistant in vitro mutants.

Mutation
Approach Note MIC value (µg/ml) Refs.
rrl rplC
T460C Serial passage Isoniazid-resistant strain >8 [1]
T460C Kanamycin-resistant strain 8
T460C Pyrazinamide-resistant strain >8
T460C Rifampicin-resistant strain 8
T460C Spontaneous Fully susceptible strain >8
G2270C Pyrazinamide-resistant strain (13 mutants derived) 4
A2810C 4
T460C 8 to >8
G2061T Spontaneous 4 isolates 32 [23], [24]
G2576T 1 isolate 16
none 5 isolates 4-8
C2848A Serial passage 17 of 32 had rrl mutations, remainder had rplC [25]
A2810T
G2270C
G2270T
G2746A
T460C
T460C Spontaneous 3 in vitro mutants selected for sequencing 16 [26]
T460C 32
G2270T 8
G2814T Spontaneous 4 isolates 25–50 [27]
T460C 12 isolates 50
G2299T 7 isolates 65–156
A2689T 1 isolate 60
G2814T 4 isolates 94

Mutations described in rrl and rplC genes. A dash (–) is used to indicate where data was not available.

Table 2.

Catalog of previously published mutations from bedaquiline- and clofazimine-resistant clinical isolates.

Mutation
Notes MIC (µg/ml)
Refs.
rv0678 atpE rv1979c BDQ CFZ
T124C Clinical strains from BDQ trial 0.25 [3]
A97C 0.5
C107T 0.5
Del C 212 0.5
Ins IS6110 nt 272 0.5
Ins C 141–142 0.25
2T>C WT fMet1Ala-relapse isolate after 0.5 4 [12], [13], [14]
BDQ compassionate use
T437C WT WT XDR 0.78 1.2 [15]
G5T WT WT Pre-XDR 0.73 4
C158T WT WT Pre-XDR 0.39 2.09
T350G WT WT XDR 1.54 4.16
WT WT A155C Pre-XDR 0.08 1.2
Del gg 18–19 MDR isolates 0.5 [16]
Ins G140 0.25
M139T 0.25
198–199 Ins G Mix: WT + rv0678 mutant 0.24;0.48;1 [17], [18]
274–275 Ins A 1
C148T, A187G intergenic mutation, rv0678 mutant 0.48
G334C, (-13) Ins IS6110 0.48
C185T 0.48
C155T 0.48
C176T 0.48
224–225 Ins A 0.24
T(-44)C 0.24
A263G Mix: WT + rv0678 mutant 0.12
T116C 0.12
T124C Mix: WT + rv0678 mutant (silent mutation) 0.12
C45T 0.12
G256A 0.12
[Ins139g] WT 0.12–0.25 [19]
L142R WT Baseline and post-treatment BDQ isolates from BDQ clinical trials 0.25
L142R A63V 0.25–1
[Del198G] [Del212C] [G233C, G78A] WT 0.12
[G66W] [Del198G] [Ins263A] [Del435T] WT 0.12
[Del198G] [Ins466C] WT 0.25
[Del435T] WT 0.25
[E113K] [Del198G] [Del435T] WT 0.25
[Del435T] WT 0.25
G121E WT 0.25
[L40S] [Del291C] [Ins386C] WT 0.25
Del291C WT 0.25
[S53P] [Del198G] [Del336C] WT 0.25
M23L WT 0.06
M23L Ins142C WT 0.12
M23L [Ins142C] [Ins419G] WT 0.12
M23L Ins419g WT 0.12
[Del19G] [E49stop] [Del198G] [Ins468GA] WT 0.12
-[V85A] [R135W] WT 0.12
V85A WT 0.12
Ins44A WT 0.06
[Ins144C] WT 0.12–0.25
Ins421G WT 0.12–0.25
Del32G WT 0.06; 0.25
[Y26stop] [L122P] WT 0.12
L122P WT 0.12
[Del214C] [Del198G] WT 0.06
[F79S] [Ins137G] WT 0.12
[Del19G] [Del198G] WT 0.12
A98V WT 0.12–0.25
WT D28N 0.12
[Ins139G] + [Ins318CG] WT 0.12
[Del274–283] [Ins139TG] WT 0.12
[C46R] [Ins139TG] [L40S] WT 0.12
Ser53Pro WT 2 XDR isolates 0.5 2–4 [20]
Ser53Leu 1 XDR isolate 0.25 2
Tyr157Asp 1 XDR isolate 0.125 2
WT 1 XDR isolate 0.5 2
WT WT G1226A 3 XDR isolates: Culture negative at 6 months 0.25–1 (MGIT) 0.06–0.125 (BMD) 0.5 (MGIT) [21]
136_137insG G1226A XDR: : Culture positive at 6 months 2 (MGIT) 0.25 (BMD) 0.5 (MGIT)
138_139insG G1226A XDR: Culture positive at 6 months 2 (MGIT) 0.5 (BMD) 2 (MGIT)
141_142insC G1226A 2 XDR isolates: Culture positive at 6 months 4 (MGIT) 0.25–0.5 (BMD) 0.5–1 (MGIT)
T200G G1226A XDR: Culture positive at 6 months 4 (MGIT) 0.5 (BMD) 2 (MGIT)
345delG G1226A XDR: Culture positive at 6 months 4 (MGIT) 0.5 (BMD) 1 (MGIT)
-11C>A WT Fully susceptible clinical isolate 0.016 [22]
D5G WT Fully susceptible clinical isolate 0.016
M23V WT STR resistant clinical isolate 0.063
D47fs WT XDR clinical isolate 0.5
E55D WT Fully susceptible clinical isolate 0.063
G87R WT Fully susceptible clinical isolate 0.063
R96Q WT INH resistant 0.25
L117R WT Fully susceptible clinical isolate 0.016
WT -53G>A Fully susceptible clinical isolate 0.125
WT -72T>C RIF and INH resistant clinical isolate 8
WT -138T>C 3 RIF and INH resistant clinical isolates 0.031
WT 183G>A Fully susceptible clinical isolate 0.063
WT I66V Fully susceptible clinical isolate 0.125

Mutations described in rv0678, atpE and rv1979c genes. A dash (–) is used to indicate where no data was available. WT-wild type, no variants detected. MGIT- MGIT960 platform used to determine MIC. BMD- Broth Micro Dilution method used to determine MIC. BDQ-Bedaquiline. CFZ-Clofazimine.

Table 4.

Catalog of previously published mutations from linezolid-resistant clinical isolates.

Mutation
Note MIC value (µg/ml) Refs.
rrl rplC
WT No mutations in rplD, rplV, whiB7, rrl, erm-37 8 (3 strains) [23]
WT 4 (1 strain)
T460C 2 resistant, 3 acquired resistance during treatment 4–16 [24]
G2447T acquired resistance during treatment 16
T460C 2 [28]
T460C 0.5
T460C 4
G2576T 4
G2576T 4
T460C 8 isolates [19]
G2814T 1 isolate
C1921T 1 isolate
G2294A 1 isolate acquired resistance during treatment
G2576T 1 MDR-TB isolate 4 [13]
A2572C
T460C 2 XDR-TB isolates 4–16 [12]

Mutations described in rrl and rplC genes. A dash (–) is used to indicate where data was not available. WT- wild type, no variants detected.

Table 5.

Mutation frequencies and selection concentrations for bedaquiline-, clofazimine- and linezolid-resistant spontaneous mutants from previously published studies.

Drug Conc (µg/ml) Strain Mutation frequency Refs.
Bedaquiline 0.12 Fully susceptible M. tuberculosis 5 × 10–7 [8]
0.12 M. smegmatis 2 × 10–8
0.24 Fully susceptible M. tuberculosis 5 × 10–8
0.24 M. smegmatis 1 × 10–8
0.03-0.05 Fully susceptible M. tuberculosis 1 × 10–8 [11]
Clinical M. tuberculosis 5 × 10–8
Clinical M. tuberculosis 1 × 10–8
Clinical M. tuberculosis 1 × 10–8
0.015-0.5 Clinical strain M. fortuitum 1.5 × 10–8
0.25-8 Clinical strain M. abscessus 1.5 × 10–8
1 Fully susceptible M. tuberculosis 6 × 10–9 [1]
Pyrazinamide-resistant M. tuberculosis 4 × 10−7
Clofazimine 0.25 Fully susceptible M. tuberculosis 5 × 106 [10]
1 Fully susceptible M. tuberculosis 5 × 105 [1]
Pyrazinamide-resistant M. tuberculosis 7 × 107
Linezolid Fully susceptible M. tuberculosis 2 × 10−8 [23]
Fully susceptible M. tuberculosis 5 × 10−9
2 Fully susceptible M. tuberculosis 1 × 108 [1]
Pyrazinamide-resistant M. tuberculosis 1 × 107

A dash (–) is used to indicate where data was not available.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

A catalog was compiled of mutations observed for in vitro, in vivo and clinical M. tuberculosis strains resistant to bedaquiline, clofazimine and linezolid as reported in studies that were identified through a comprehensive literature search. This was done by searching for combinations of each drug (or drug class) together with terms like “resistant”, “resistance”, “mutant”, “mutations” as well as “Mycobacterium tuberculosis”. Related and citing articles were also reviewed. The articles were then analyzed on the basis of the approach used and the mutations documented. Mutations were delineated as arising from either in vivo or clinical and in vitro.

Acknowledgements

Nabila Ismail received PhD support from The National Research Fund, South Africa (SFH150723130071) and the University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.057.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

.

References

  • 1.Ismail N., Omar S.V., Ismail N.A., Peters R.P.H. In vitro approaches for generation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants resistant to bedaquiline, clofazimine or linezolid and identification of associated genetic variants. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2018;153:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Almeida D., Ioerger T., Tyagi S., Li S.Y., Mdluli K., Andries K., Grosset J., Sacchettini J., Nuermberger E. Mutations in pepQ confer low-level resistance to bedaquiline and clofazimine in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;60(8):4590–4599. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00753-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Andries K., Villellas C., Coeck N., Thys K., Gevers T., Vranckx L., Lounis N., de Jong B.C., Koul A. Acquired resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to bedaquiline. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hards K., Robson J.R., Berney M., Shaw L., Bald D., Koul A., Andries K., Cook G.M. Bactericidal mode of action of bedaquiline. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015;70(7):2028–2037. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Koul A., Dendouga N., Vergauwen K., Molenberghs B., Vranckx L., Willebrords R., Ristic Z., Lill H., Dorange I., Guillemont J., Bald D., Andries K. Diarylquinolines target subunit c of mycobacterial ATP synthase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007;3:323–324. doi: 10.1038/nchembio884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Petrella S., Cambau E., Chauffour A., Andries K., Jarlier V., Sougakoff W. Genetic basis for natural and acquired resistance to the diarylquinoline R207910 in mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006;50(8):2853–2856. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00244-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huitric E., Verhasselt P., Koul A., Andries K., Hoffner S., Andersson D.I. Rates and mechanisms of resistance development in Mycobacterium tuberculosis to a novel diarylquinoline ATP synthase inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54(3):1022–1028. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01611-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Andries K., Verhasselt P., Guillemont J., Gohlmann H.W., Neefs J.M., Winkler H., Gestel J. Van, Timmerman P., Zhu M., Lee E., Williams P., de Chaffoy D., Huitric E., Hoffner S., Cambau E., Truffot-Pernot C., Lounis N., Jarlier V. A diarylquinoline drug active on the ATP synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 2005;307(5707):223–227. doi: 10.1126/science.1106753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hartkoorn R.C., Uplekar S., Cole S.T. Cross-resistance between clofazimine and bedaquiline through upregulation of MmpL5 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58(5):2979–2981. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00037-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang S., Chen J., Cui P., Shi W., Zhang W., Zhang Y. Identification of novel mutations associated with clofazimine resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015;70(9):2507–2510. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Segala E., Sougakoff W., Nevejans-Chauffour A., Jarlier V., Petrella S. New mutations in the mycobacterial ATP synthase: new insights into the binding of the diarylquinoline TMC207 to the ATP synthase C-ring structure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2326–2334. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06154-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Somoskovi A., Bruderer V., Homke R., Bloemberg G.V., Bottger E.C. A mutation associated with clofazimine and bedaquiline cross-resistance in MDR-TB following bedaquiline treatment. Eur. Respir. J. 2015;45(2):554–557. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00142914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bloemberg G.V., Keller P.M., Stucki D., Trauner A., Borrell S., Latshang T., Coscolla M., Rothe T., Hömke R., Ritter C., Feldmann J., Schulthess B., Gagneux S., Böttger E.C. Acquired resistance to bedaquiline and delamanid in therapy for tuberculosis. New Engl. J. Med. 2015;373(20):1986–1988. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hoffmann H., Kohl T.A., Hofmann-Thiel S., Merker M., Beckert P., Jaton K., Nedialkova L., Sahalchyk E., Rothe T., Keller P.M., Niemann S. Delamanid and bedaquiline resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis ancestral Beijing genotype causing extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in a Tibetan refugee. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016;193(3):337–340. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0372LE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xu J., Wang B., Hu M., Huo F., Guo S., Jing W., Nuermberger E., Lu Y. Primary clofazimine and bedaquiline resistance among isolates from patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61(6) doi: 10.1128/AAC.00239-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Veziris N., Bernard C., Guglielmetti L., Le Du D., Marigot-Outtandy D., Jaspard M., Caumes E., Lerat I., Rioux C., Yazdanpanah Y., Tiotiu A., Lemaitre N., Brossier F., Jarlier V., Robert J., Sougakoff W., Aubry A., MyRMA C.N.R., the Tuberculosis Consilium of the C.N.R.M., MyRMA, C.N.R, Tuberculosis Consilium of the C.N.R.M. Rapid emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bedaquiline resistance: lessons to avoid repeating past errors. Eur. Respir. J. 2017;49 doi: 10.1183/13993003.01719-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Villellas C., Coeck N., Meehan C.J., Lounis N., de Jong B., Rigouts L., Andries K. Unexpected high prevalence of resistance-associated Rv0678 variants in MDR-TB patients without documented prior use of clofazimine or bedaquiline. J Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017;72:684–690. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pym A.S., Diacon A.H., Tang S.J., Conradie F., Danilovits M., Chuchottaworn C., Vasilyeva I., Andries K., Bakare N., De Marez T., Haxaire-Theeuwes M., Lounis N., Meyvisch P., Van Baelen B., van Heeswijk R.P., Dannemann B. Bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2016;47:564–574. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00724-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zimenkov D.V., Nosova E.Y., Kulagina E.V., Antonova O.V., Arslanbaeva L.R., Isakova A.I., Krylova L.Y., Peretokina I.V., Makarova M.V., Safonova S.G., Borisov S.E., Gryadunov D.A. Examination of bedaquiline- and linezolid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the Moscow region. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017;72(7):1901–1906. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pang Y., Zong Z., Huo F., Jing W., Ma Y., Dong L., Li Y., Zhao L., Fu Y., Huang H. in vitro drug susceptibility of bedaquiline, delamanid, linezolid, clofazimine, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin against extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Beijing, China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61(10) doi: 10.1128/AAC.00900-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ismail N.A., Omar S.V., Joseph L., Govender N., Blows L., Ismail F., Koornhof H., Dreyer A.W., Kaniga K., Ndjeka N. Defining bedaquiline susceptibility, resistance, cross-resistance and associated genetic determinants: a retrospective Cohort study. EBioMedicine. 2018;28:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Martinez E., Hennessy D., Jelfs P., Crighton T., Chen S.C.A., Sintchenko V. Mutations associated with in vitro resistance to bedaquiline in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Australia. Tuberculosis. 2018;111:31–34. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hillemann D., Rusch-Gerdes S., Richter E. In vitro-selected linezolid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008;52(2):800–801. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01189-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beckert P., Hillemann D., Kohl T.A., Kalinowski J., Richter E., Niemann S., Feuerriegel S. rplC T460C identified as a dominant mutation in linezolid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2743–2745. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06227-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang S., Chen J., Cui P., Shi W., Shi X., Niu H., Chan D., Yew W.W., Zhang W., Zhang Y. Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutations associated with reduced susceptibility to linezolid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;60:2542–2544. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02941-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Balasubramanian V., Solapure S., Iyer H., Ghosh A., Sharma S., Kaur P., Deepthi R., Subbulakshmi V., Ramya V., Ramachandran V., Balganesh M., Wright L., Melnick D., Butler S.L., Sambandamurthy V.K. Bactericidal activity and mechanism of action of AZD5847, a novel oxazolidinone for treatment of tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58(1):495–502. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01903-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McNeil M.B., Dennison D.D., Shelton C.D., Parish T. in vitro Isolation and characterization of oxazolidinone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61(10) doi: 10.1128/AAC.01296-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee M., Lee J., Carroll M.W., Choi H., Min S., Song T., Via L.E., Goldfeder L.C., Kang E., Jin B., Park H., Kwak H., Kim H., Jeon H.S., Jeong I., Joh J.S., Chen R.Y., Olivier K.N., Shaw P.A., Follmann D., Song S.D., Lee J.K., Lee D., Kim C.T., Dartois V., Park S.K., Cho S.N., Barry C.E., 3rd Linezolid for treatment of chronic extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. New Engl. J. Med. 2012;367(16):1508–1518. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES