Skip to main content
Patient preference and adherence logoLink to Patient preference and adherence
. 2018 Oct 2;12:1989–1996. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S172021

Satisfaction survey among primary health care outpatients in the backward region: an empirical study from rural Western China

Xin He 1, Lingui Li 2, Ying Bian 1,
PMCID: PMC6173270  PMID: 30323568

Abstract

Background

With a growing health demand, patient satisfaction analysis is essential for evaluating the accessibility and performance of medical services. Previous studies had explored the Chinese outpatient satisfaction and influencing factors in developed areas and tertiary hospitals. Considering the lower education level, less income, and heavier economic burden, it was necessary to conduct a region-specific questionnaire survey for the outpatient’s satisfaction in rural Western China.

Objective

To analyze the satisfaction of primary outpatient service in rural Western China, and explore the factors affecting outpatients’ satisfaction.

Methods

Questionnaire composed of nine 5-Likert items was applied to survey outpatient satisfaction among randomly selected samples in 11 provinces of Western China. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to study the factor structure of questionnaire. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to study the influencing factors.

Results

A total of 2,754 outpatients completed the questionnaire, the response rate was 88.7%. Respondents were most satisfied with medical staff service attitude (3.71±0.83) and least satisfied with medical cost (2.97±0.83). A 3-factor solution was adopted in EFA to explain the overall satisfaction. Factors identified were “Service attitude”, “Facility and professional skills”, and “Patients’ cost”. And, the questionnaire was proved to have good reliability and acceptable internal consistency. The stepwise multiple linear regression analysis results presented that factors, including sample hospital type (P<0.05), age (P<0.001), education level (P<0.05), occupation (P<0.01), monthly income (P<0.05), and chronic disease conditions (P<0.01) were significantly associated with the dimensional or overall satisfaction.

Conclusion

The primary health care outpatient satisfaction in rural Western China is lower than developed areas and tertiary hospitals. Care providers in backward regions should pay more attention to patients’ demographic characteristics and health status, to meet outpatients’ actual demand. Efficient hospital management methods, modern technology, and staff training are needed to improve the service quality and care efficiency.

Keywords: outpatient satisfaction, factor analysis, stepwise multiple linear regression, county-level hospitals, backward regions, Western China

Introduction

Patient satisfaction is consumers’ evaluation about the effectiveness, safety, and benefit of health care service, which is a combination of patients’ experience and perception.13 Patient satisfaction is an important and commonly used indicator for measuring the quality of health care, and higher patient satisfaction would lead to better clinical outcomes and less care resource utilization. Therefore, patient satisfaction survey is essential for patients, health care provider, and health care payer.46

Most patient satisfaction studies were conducted in the USA and European countries, suggesting that patients in the flourishing regions tend to evaluate the quality of health care service based on waiting time, medical staffs’ proficiency, hospital environment, and participation in the medical decision making.3,4,710 There are several recent patient assessment studies, which were conducted in developing countries, including India, Thailand, Tanzania, and Ethiopia. Patients in these countries care more about the location of health facility, hospital comfort, and access to appropriate services.1115 Patients perception varies according to education level, age, income, and residence.15

As proposed in previous literature,16 with the increasing population and patient expectation, patient satisfaction analysis is essential to evaluate the accessibility and quality of medical service, especially in developing countries, such as China. Some researchers had explored the outpatient satisfaction and factors affecting Chinese patients’ satisfaction, mostly from developed provinces or tertiary hospitals, performing descriptive analysis and satisfaction ratings survey.17,18 Questionnaire is a commonly used satisfaction survey instrument. As reported in studies conducting univariate or regression analysis, factors, including hospital environment, medical facility, service attitude, patients’ involvement in decision making, doctors and nurses’ proficient skills, effective communication between patients and doctors, disease severity, medical cost, waiting time, and service time were associated with Chinese outpatients’ satisfaction in advanced areas or tertiary hospitals.1923 Similar results were also previously demonstrated in Hong Kong and Taiwan studies.2426

According to Grossman (1973),27 patients’ demand for medical services is associated with demographic characteristics and socioeconomic conditions; therefore, patients’ demand and satisfaction in backward areas should be measured in a different way from developed areas.28 So far, no questionnaire studies have been designed to assess primary health care outpatient’s satisfaction with a large-sample evidence covering different backward provinces in China. Considering the relatively lower education level, less individual income, and heavier economic burden, it is necessary to process a region-specific questionnaire survey for the outpatient’s satisfaction in rural Western China. Consequently, the objective of this study was to conduct a satisfaction survey in primary outpatient service in rural Western China and explore the factors affecting outpatients’ satisfaction.

Materials and methods

This research was approved by the research ethics committee of Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau.

Questionnaire development

The initial questionnaire draft was designed based on the literature review, and the literature search was conducted using CNKI and PubMed database in June 2014, by keywords including “outpatient”, “satisfaction”, “China” and “questionnaire”. More than 50 previous outpatients’ satisfaction survey and relevant studies were screened, and the adaptive information was extracted to compose the item pool. And, local medical price, reimbursement percentage, residents’ income, and education level were considered during the pilot study. According to the pilot study results and local physicians’ advice, the final draft version contains 9 items, including time spent in commuting to hospital, waiting time, doctors’ disease description, patients’ participation in decision making, staff service attitude, hospital facility, hospital environment, medical cost, and doctors and nurses’ professional skills. Interviewees were also asked to fill their background information, including age, gender, occupation, education level, monthly income, medical insurance type, and condition of chronic diseases.

The questionnaire was designed as a 5-point Likert scale,29 and interviewees were asked to rate each item: very dissatisfied (1), dissatisfied (2), neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (3), satisfied (4), and very satisfied (5).

Sampling

Eleven provincial-level divisions in Western China were selected to explore the outpatient satisfaction, including Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Weiwuer Autonomous Region, Gansu Province, Shaanxi province, Qinghai province, Sichuan province, Guizhou Province, Yunnan Province, Inner Mongolia, and Tibet Autonomous Region. In each province, all counties were divided into 3 levels by GDP per capita, and 1 sample county was randomly selected from each level of 11 provinces. The county general hospital, maternal and child health center, and hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in each sample county were recruited as sample hospitals. Fifty outpatients drawn randomly from each sample hospital were enrolled into the study, receiving the questionnaire when leaving the hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all interviewees before filling the questionnaire. All questions were explained by trained investigators. The questionnaire for interviewees aged <14 years was answered by their adult supervisor.

Statistical analysis

The missing item and total response rates were used to assess the questionnaire acceptability and feasibility. Descriptive data were tabulated to present participants’ demographic and other background characteristics. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), using principal component analysis and varimax rotation, was conducted to assess the dimensionality of overall satisfaction, evaluate the structure validity, and reduce the number of variables.3032 Multiple linear regression analysis in a stepwise method (p for removal was set at 0.1 and p for entry at 0.05) was implied to explore the association between outpatients’ characteristics and satisfaction factor scores. Outpatients’ background characteristics that showed significant difference in univariate analysis were included as independent variables, with dimensional and overall factor scores as dependent variables.

All data analysis was performed using SPSS version 19.0.

Results

The questionnaire survey was conducted from October to December 2014. A total of 3,193 patients participated in the survey, and 2,754 questionnaires were fully completed. The missing value rate for each item was 0.2%–0.5%, and the total response rate was 88.7%, indicating that the questionnaire was acceptable and feasible.

Descriptive findings

The descriptive results of participants’ demographic and other background characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mean age of respondents was 36.86 (SD=14.30), 40% were female, and 60% were male. Only 40% of interviewees had completed at least high school education. Farming was the most common occupation, and 70.4% of responders’ income was <2001 yuan (~330 USD) per month. Most participants were enrolled in public medical insurance, 14.6% of respondents were insured by Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI), 9.5% by Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI), and 60.2% by New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS). A total of 20% of the participants had chronic diseases.

Table 1.

Respondents’ characteristics and descriptive findings

Characteristics N (%)
Age, mean (±SD) 36.86 (±14.30)
Gender
 Female 1,101 (40.0)
 Male 1,653 (60.0)
Education
 Illiteracy 287 (10.4)
 Primary school 503 (18.3)
 Junior high school 887 (32.2)
 High school 638 (23.2)
 College or above 439 (15.9)
Occupation
 Farmer 923 (33.5)
 Blue-collar worker 328 (11.9)
 Business/service/enterprise employee 474 (17.2)
 Teacher/governments or public-sector staff 295 (10.7)
 Student/unemployed/other jobs 679 (24.7)
 Retirement 55 (2.0)
Monthly income (RMB)
 No income 689 (25.0)
 1–2,000 yuan 1,250 (45.4)
 2,001–4,000 yuan 655 (23.8)
 4,001 yuan and above 160 (5.8)
Medical insurance
 National health insurance 96 (3.5)
 UEBMI 402 (14.6)
 URBMI 261 (9.5)
 NRCMS 1,658 (60.2)
 Urban and rural residents medical insurance 73 (2.7)
 Other insurances 53 (1.9)
 No medical insurance 211 (7.7)
Chronic diseases
 Yes 550 (20.0)
 No 2,204 (80.0)

Abbreviations: UEBMI, Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance; URBMI, Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance; NRCMS, New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme.

Outpatients satisfaction item scores

The results of the outpatients’ satisfaction survey are shown in detail in Table 2. According to the mean scores, respondents were most satisfied with medical staff service attitude (3.71±0.83) and second, doctors’ disease description (3.64±0.84). Medical cost was the least satisfactory item (2.97±0.83). The sum of mean scores of 9 items was 30.58, with the maximum score of 45, which was relatively lower than the average satisfaction scores in previous studies.

Table 2.

Outpatients satisfaction item scores

Contents Very dissatisfied, N (%) Dissatisfied, N (%) Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, N (%) Satisfied, N (%) Very satisfied, N (%) Mean ± SD
X1 Time spent commuting to hospital 114 (4.1) 371 (13.5) 1,217 (44.2) 774 (28.1) 278 (10.1) 3.27±0.96
X2 Waiting time 169 (6.1) 559 (20.3) 1,249 (45.4) 584 (21.2) 193 (7.0) 3.03±0.97
X3 Doctors’ disease description 42 (1.5) 117 (4.2) 1,038 (37.7) 1,153 (41.9) 404 (14.7) 3.64±0.84
X4 Patients’ participation in decision-making 93 (3.4) 127 (4.6) 1,016 (36.9) 1,155 (41.9) 363 (13.2) 3.57±0.90
X5 Service attitude 32 (1.2) 113 (4.1) 938 (34.1) 1,209 (43.9) 462 (16.8) 3.71±0.83
X6 Hospital facility 32 (1.2) 216 (7.8) 1,367 (49.6) 879 (31.9) 260 (9.4) 3.41±0.81
X7 Hospital environment 48 (1.7) 272 (9.9) 1,321 (48.0) 885 (32.1) 228 (8.3) 3.35±0.84
X8 Medical cost 87 (3.2) 605 (22.0) 1,479 (53.7) 457 (16.6) 126 (4.6) 2.97±0.83
X9 Doctors and nurses’ professional skills 19 (0.7) 90 (3.3) 1,083 (39.3) 1,276 (46.3) 286 (10.4) 3.62±0.84

Factor analysis

EFA was conducted to explore the dimensionality of the overall outpatients’ satisfaction in rural Western China and analyze the validity of the dimensional structure.

The overall Cronbach’s α value was 0.75, suggesting good reliability. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure for the dataset was 0.804, the Bartlett’s test was 6,002.289 (P<0.001), and all item-total correlations exceeded 0.50, implying that the data were adequate for EFA.3133

Principal component analysis and varimax rotation were adopted. As shown in Table 3, only 2 factors had eigenvalues >1.34 However, combined with the cumulative variance percentage and scree plot (see Figure 1),35,36 a 3-factor solution was applied in the factor analysis.

Table 3.

Factor eigenvalues and variance percentage

Components Initial eigenvalue
Rotation sums of square loadings
Total % of variance Cumulative % Total % of variance Cumulative %
1 3.243 36.038 36.038 2.058 22.872 22.872
2 1.493 16.584 52.622 1.900 21.113 43.985
3 0.860 9.555 62.177 1.637 18.192 62.177
4 0.840 9.338 71.515
5 0.622 6.906 78.421
6 0.589 6.545 84.966
7 0.561 6.231 91.197
8 0.405 4.499 95.696
9 0.387 4.304 100.000

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Scree plot of eigenvalues.

According to the factor loading values, 9 items were explained by 3 dimensions. Factor 1 “Service attitude” consisted of the 3 items of the questionnaire, including patients’ participation in decision making, doctors’ disease description, and medical staff service attitude. Factor 2 “Facility and professional skills” consisted of hospital environment, hospital facility, and doctors and nurses’ professional skills. Factor 3 “Patients’ cost” consisted of 3 items, including waiting time, time spent commuting to hospital, and medical cost.

The internal consistency of the matrix was examined. For Factors 1 and 2, the Cronbach’s α values were 0.733 and 0.740, respectively, which were considered very good. The inter-item correlation (IIC) can also be adopted as a measure of internal consistency when the number of items in the scale was <10, which was acceptable between 0.2 and 0.4. Thus, the internal consistency of Factor 3 was considered acceptable although the Cronbach’s α value was only 0.542.32,37

More details of EFA results are available in Table 4.

Table 4.

Results of EFA

Item Factors and contents Loadings h2 Item-total correlation Cronbach’s α IIC
Service attitude (Factor 1) 0.733 0.477
X4  Patients’ participation in decision making 0.840 0.733 0.805
X3  Doctors’ disease description 0.815 0.729 0.803
X5  Staff service attitude 0.588 0.518 0.880
Facility and professional skills (Factor 2) 0.740 0.487
X7  Hospital environment 0.861 0.771 0.797
X6  Hospital facility 0.824 0.748 0.794
X9  Doctors and nurses’ professional skills 0.555 0.520 0.894
Patients’ cost (Factor 3) 0.542 0.279
X2  Waiting time 0.796 0.650 0.632
X1  Time spent commuting to hospital 0.750 0.572 0.652
X8  Medical cost 0.574 0.356 0.789

Abbreviations: EFA, Exploratory factor analysis; IIC, inter-item correlation.

Factors associated with outpatient’s satisfaction

The regression method was used to estimate the factor score coefficients, and the scores of Factor 1 (F1), Factor 2 (F2), and Factor 3 (F3) were produced by SPSS software. To comprehensively explore the characteristics associated with outpatients’ satisfaction, the factor score of overall satisfaction (F) was calculated based on the score and variance contribution rate of the 3 main factors:31,38

F=0.22872*F1+0.21113*F2+0.18192*F3

Stepwise multiple linear regression was conducted to investigate the factors influencing the 3 main dimensions and the overall satisfaction. Patients’ age, sample hospital type, education, occupation, monthly income, medical insurance type, and chronic disease condition showed significant differences in the univariate analysis, thus included in regression model as independent variables, with F1, F2, F3 and F as dependent variables.

Table 5 presents the results of the stepwise multiple linear regression, which demonstrated that the age, sample hospital type, education, occupation, monthly income, and chronic disease condition were statistically associated with the dimensional or overall outpatient satisfaction.

Table 5.

Multiple linear regression results of factors influencing outpatients’ satisfaction

Variable Service attitude (F1)
Facility and professional skills (F2)
Patients’ cost (F3)
Overall satisfaction (F)
β P-value β P-value β P-value β P-value
Age 0.003 <0.016* 0.004 0.002** 0.007 <0.001*** 0.003 <0.001***
Sample hospital type
 Other county hospitalsa
 County general hospitals −0.113 0.003** 0.098 0.011* −0.147 <0.001*** −0.032 0.018*
Education
 Primary school or lessa
 Junior middle school or higher 0.197 <0.001*** 0.110 0.012* −0.145 0.001** 0.037 0.029*
Occupation
 Farmer/worker/student/unemployment/othersa
 Business/service/enterprise employee/government staff/teacher/retirement 0.167 <0.001*** 0.042 0.008**
Monthly income (RMB)
 No incomea
 1–2,000 yuan 0.164 <0.001***
 2,001 yuan or above −0.121 0.046* 0.140 0.008**
Chronic diseases
 Noa
 Yes 0.204 <0.001*** 0.139 0.005** 0.074 <0.001***

Notes:

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001,

a

As reference category.

According to the coefficients and P-values, significant differences were observed among different respondent populations in dimensional satisfaction: older outpatients had higher satisfaction score in all 3 dimensions; interviewees from general county hospitals were more satisfied with “Facility and professional skills”, but less satisfied with other 2 dimensions than other county hospitals; compared with lower educated patients, respondents who had completed at least junior middle school were more satisfied with “Service attitude” and “Facility and professional skills”, less satisfied with “Patients’ cost”; outpatients with chronic diseases graded higher in “Service attitude” and “Facility and professional skills”; higher income participants were more satisfied with “Patients’ cost”, and less satisfied with “Service attitude”; and teachers, governments staff, service industry workers, business workers, enterprise employee, and retirees, in comparison with farmers, workers, students, and the unemployed, were more satisfied with “Service attitude”.

Different respondent populations also had significant differences in overall satisfaction: the overall satisfaction increased significantly with age; interviewees from other county hospitals were more satisfied than those from general county hospitals; outpatients with chronic diseases graded higher overall satisfaction; and higher educated respondents were more satisfied; teachers, governments staff, service industry workers, business workers, enterprise employees and retirees, compared with farmers, workers, students and the unemployed, were more satisfied with overall outpatient health care.

Discussion

Patients’ satisfaction is an important and commonly used indicator to analyze the patients’ demand, performance, and utilization of medical service. Therefore, patients’ satisfaction research is essential in the process of China’s health system reform. Although several patient satisfaction reports had been published before, no intensive study was conducted to investigate outpatients’ satisfaction with large-sample evidence covering China’s backward provinces.

In this research, county hospital outpatients’ satisfaction of 11 provinces in Western China were analyzed. A total of 2,754 outpatients completed the questionnaire, and the response rate was 88.7%. Among included respondents, 45.5% were farmers and 60.2% were insured with the NRCMS. According to China’s National Health Service Survey (NHSS) report, 2013,39 Western China residents have lower outpatient satisfaction rate than Middle and Eastern China. Rural residents have higher satisfaction rate with regard to “medical staff” (80.3%–82.7%) than “hospital environment” (67.9%) and “waiting time” (70.7%), supporting the results of higher satisfaction in “service attitude”, “doctors’ disease description” and “medical staff proficient skills” in this paper. “Medical cost” was the least satisfactory item, which had also been previously presented in NHSS report and outpatients’ satisfaction study in Beijing.23,39 In this study, no satisfaction item core exceeded 3.8, less than the overall satisfaction scores (4.67±0.62) for outpatient in tertiary hospitals,20 the result is consistent with previous references,40,41 suggesting that outpatients in primary health care in rural Western China were relatively less satisfied with medical service than developed areas or tertiary hospitals.

EFA results showed a 3-dimension structure of overall outpatient satisfaction, “Service attitude”, “Facility and professional skills”, and “Patients’ cost” with 3 items, respectively, and demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity. The stepwise multiple linear regression results indicated that age, sample hospital type, education, occupation, monthly income, and chronic disease condition were statistically associated with dimensional or overall outpatient satisfaction.

The overall satisfaction increased with age, which was agreeable to the report of outpatient satisfaction in Ningxia province and Shanghai.21,42 Respondents with chronic diseases tended to have higher overall satisfaction, and a similar trend was observed in satisfaction study from developed areas.23 It is possible that the elderly and chronic patients, compared with the young and patients without chronic diseases, were more experienced and trusted their doctors due to their health status. Participants from county-level general hospital were less satisfied with “Patients’ cost” than other county hospitals, since waiting time was reported as the most important item of patient satisfaction in general hospitals,43 this result was in agreement with the lower overall satisfaction in county general hospital. Outpatients with higher income were more satisfied with “Patient cost” but less satisfied with “Service attitude”, predicting the increasing demand for better service attitude with the growing income of Chinese residents. Contrary to previous evidence,44 although less satisfied with “Patients’ cost”, better educated outpatients were more satisfied with “Service attitude”, “Facility and professional skills”, and overall outpatient service. It is probably the accessibility to high-quality medical service rather than the affordability that influence the overall satisfaction of educated outpatients in rural Western China. Teachers, governments staff, service industry workers, business workers, enterprise employees, and retirees had higher overall satisfaction than farmers, workers, students, and the unemployed, which may be related to the stable income and higher reimbursement rate of the former.

Patient satisfaction is a reflection of the residents’ health care demand, understanding the demand of patients under different conditions plays a crucial role in improving the performance and efficiency of medical services. There are similarities and differences between the results in this survey and previous literatures, which suggest that outpatients’ health care demand in rural Western China have their own uniqueness. As reported in China’s NHSS, 2013,39 “high medical cost” was the primary cause of rural outpatient dissatisfaction in recent years, and then “poor professional skills” and “bad service attitude”. However, considering the association between outpatients’ characteristics and satisfaction in this study, primary demand of some rural outpatients has altered from lower price to higher efficiency, better service attitude, and professional skills. Since China has implemented the national Essential Medicines List in 2009 and required no drug profit margins in public hospitals in 2017, a universal access to affordable essential medicines would be promoted in a few years, health care providers should identify and target more initiatives to improve service attitude, environment, and professional skills. In rural Western China, efficient hospital management methods, modern technologies, and more staff training are needed to improve the health care service quality. Implementation of electronic patient record system and consultation desk in each department may reduce the patient queue time and doctor preparation time in general hospitals.45 More interpersonal communication training would help doctors and nurses in disease explanation and promoting service attitude.46 Rural primary health care institutions are also suggested to develop more patient education about chronic disease management, promote patient participation, and improve the care efficiency.47

Most of published satisfaction questionnaire survey on Chinese patients were single-center study in tertiary hospitals or developed regions,23,48 conducting regression analysis on mean satisfaction score or satisfaction rate.21,44 Compared with previous literature, a questionnaire was developed in this study to collect primary health care outpatients’ satisfaction score in rural Western China, then EFA and multiple linear regression were conducted to describe the satisfaction dimension and associated factors, exploring rural outpatient satisfaction from another perspective. It is the first outpatient satisfaction questionnaire study based on EFA with multi-province evidence in backward China, and the questionnaire showed acceptable reliability and good feasibility.

Limitations

Although there was a large sample size and reliable results, it should be noted that this study has some limitations: 1) the research sampling was not conducted based on the population distribution of 11 provinces, which may cause the deviation of sample resource. 2) Differences of economic level and medical service quality among 11 provinces were not controlled, by which the satisfaction difference caused could not be explained in this study.

Conclusion

On the whole, the primary health care outpatient satisfaction in rural Western China is lower than developed areas and tertiary hospitals, “Service attitude”, “Facility and professional skills”, and “Patients’ cost” were the main 3 dimensions of overall satisfaction, with significant differences among patients with different demographic characteristics and chronic disease conditions. Local health care institutions should evaluate and manage the outpatient service quality based on the actual need of patients, considering patients’ demographic characteristics and health status. Efficient hospital management methods, modern technologies, and staff training are needed to improve the quality of medical service and care efficiency in backward areas.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Research Fund of the University of Macau, Macau SAR, China. Funds (MYRG106(Y1-L3)-ICMS13-BY and MYRG2015–00190-ICMS-QRCM).

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1):e001570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(4):509–516. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tehrani AB, Feldman SR, Camacho FT, Balkrishnan R. Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Medical Care in the United States. Health Outcomes Res Med. 2011;2(4):e197–e202. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kleefstra SM, Kool RB, Veldkamp CM, et al. A core questionnaire for the assessment of patient satisfaction in academic hospitals in The Netherlands: development and first results in a nationwide study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):e24. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.030825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Säilä T, Mattila E, Kaila M, Aalto P, Kaunonen M. Measuring patient assessments of the quality of outpatient care: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(1):148–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anhang Price R, Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality. Med Care Res Rev. 2014;71(5):522–554. doi: 10.1177/1077558714541480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Etier BE, Orr SP, Antonetti J, Thomas SB, Theiss SM. Factors impacting Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores in orthopedic surgery spine clinic. Spine J. 2016;16(11):1285–1289. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Garratt AM, Bjaertnes ØA, Krogstad U, Gulbrandsen P. The OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(6):433–437. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kleefstra SM, Kool RB, Zandbelt LC, de Haes JCJM. An instrument assessing patient satisfaction with day care in hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:125. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rahmqvist M, Bara AC. Patient characteristics and quality dimensions related to patient satisfaction. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(2):86–92. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mohd A, Chakravarty A. Patient satisfaction with services of the outpatient department. Med J Armed Forces India. 2014;70(3):237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goel S, Sharma D, Singh A. Development and validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for outpatients attending health centres in North Indian cities. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014;19(2):85–93. doi: 10.1177/1355819613508381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jaturapatporn D, Hathirat S, Manataweewat B, et al. Reliability and validity of a Thai version of the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(9):1491–1496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khamis K, Njau B. Patients’ level of satisfaction on quality of health care at Mwananyamala hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):400. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Woldeyohanes TR, Woldehaimanot TE, Kerie MW, Mengistie MA, Yesuf EA. Perceived patient satisfaction with in-patient services at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:285. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1179-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Andaleeb SS. Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: a study of hospitals in a developing country. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(9):1359–1370. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00235-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cai S, Cai W, Deng L, Cai B, Yu M. Hospital organizational environment and staff satisfaction in China: A large-scale survey. Int J Nurs Pract. 2016;22(6):565–573. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li X, Zhang H, Wang J, Li F, Chen J, Chen J. Assessing patient satisfaction with medication related services in hospital settings: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey in China. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;52(7):587–597. doi: 10.5414/CP202016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lv Y, Xue C, Ge Y, et al. Analysis of factors influencing inpatient and outpatient satisfaction with the Chinese military health service. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sun J, Hu G, Ma J, et al. Consumer satisfaction with tertiary healthcare in China: findings from the 2015 China National Patient Survey. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(2):213–221. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yu W, Li M, Xue C, et al. Determinants and influencing mechanism of outpatient satisfaction: a survey on tertiary hospitals in the People’s Republic of China. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:601–612. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S104453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang N, Sun D, Zhou H. Influencing factors of outpatients’ satisfaction rate in large general hospitals. Chin Hosp. 2011;15(10):25–27. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bao C, Zhou Y, Li J, Wu F, Cao J, Tian J. Investigation and analysis of outpatients’ satisfaction of 2170 cases. Chin Hosp Manage. 2015;35(9):34–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stanworth JO, Hsu RS, Warden CA. Validation of a Measure of Chinese Outpatients’ Satisfaction in the Taiwan Setting. Inquiry. 2017;54 doi: 10.1177/0046958016688979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wong EL, Leung MC, Cheung AW, Yam CH, Yeoh EK, Griffiths S. A population-based survey using PPE-15: relationship of care aspects to patient satisfaction in Hong Kong. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23(4):390–396. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xie Z, Or C. Associations between waiting times, service times, and patient satisfaction in an endocrinology outpatient department: A time study and questionnaire survey. Inquiry. 2017;54:46958017739527. doi: 10.1177/0046958017739527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grossman M. On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health. J Polit Econ. 1972;80(2):223–255. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wei J, Shen L, Yang HB, et al. Development and validation of a Chinese outpatient satisfaction questionnaire: evidence from 46 public general hospitals and 5151 outpatients. Public Health. 2015;129(11):1523–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;140:22. 55. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Alamanou GD, Balokas AS, Fotos VN, Patiraki E, Brokalaki H. Information needs of cancer patients: Validation of the Greek Cassileth’s Information Styles Questionnaire. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;20:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Field A. In: Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Carmichael M, editor. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pallant J. SPSS survival manual. UK: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu M. SPSS operation and application: The practice of auantitative analysis of auestionnaire data. Chongqing University Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):141–151. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;30:179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1(2):245–276. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mansour M. Factor analysis of nursing students’ perception of patient safety education. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(1):32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Distefano C, Zhu M, Mindrila D. Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Prac Assess, Res Eval. 2009;14(20):1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Center for Health Statistics and Information An Analysis Report of National Health Services Survey in China, 2013: Beijing Medical University and China Xie – he Medical University Joint Publishing House. 2015. [Accessed September 14, 2018]. Available from: http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/ewebeditor/uploadfile/2016/10/20161026163512679.pdf. Chinese.
  • 40.Chen X. Satisfaction study on rural community healthcare service in backward area. Labor Security World. 2012;10:48–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ge Z, Huang J, Wang M, Hu Y, Lv X, Chen Y. Analyzing the outpatients’ satisfaction in township health clinics. Chin Health Serv Manage. 2011;2:132–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li J, Li Z, Qiao H, Ouyang H. Outpatient satisfaction study in public county hospital reform pilot hospitals, Ningxia province. Ningxia Med Univ. 2016;38(12):1396–1400. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yuan Y, Li L. Investigation and analysis of outpatient satisfaction in a general hospital in Hunan province. China Health Ind. 2015;26:51–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhou Z, Mei C, Zhang Y, Shao J. Study on satisfaction degree of outpatients in a top-notched hospital. Mod Prev Med. 2011;38(7):1262–1265. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, et al. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e2–e8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Al-Abri R, Al-Balushi A. Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement. Oman Med J. 2014;29(1):3–7. doi: 10.5001/omj.2014.02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nie L, Wu H, Wang Y, Yuan X. Analyzing the satisfaction on health management for rural patients with chronic diseases and its influencing factors. Chin Health Serv Manage. 2018;3:205–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shi J, Gong Y, Li Y, Jiang Y, Hu P. Development of out-patient satisfaction assessment scale and empirical study. Chin Health Serv Manage. 2015;4:262–267. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Patient preference and adherence are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES