Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Proteomics. 2016 Jul;16(13):1881–1888. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201500102

Peptide-based systems analysis of inflammation induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells reveals diverse signaling pathways

Waeowalee Choksawangkarn 1,2, Lauren M Graham 1, Meghan Burke 1, Sang Bok Lee 1,3, Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg 4, Catherine Fenselau 1, Nathan J Edwards 5
PMCID: PMC6174082  NIHMSID: NIHMS985682  PMID: 27193397

Abstract

A better understanding of molecular signaling between myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), tumor cells, T-cells, and inflammatory mediators is expected to contribute to more effective cancer immunotherapies. We focus on plasma membrane associated proteins, which are critical in signaling and intercellular communication, and investigate changes in their abundance in MDSC of tumor-bearing mice subject to heightened versus basal inflammatory conditions. Using spectral counting, we observed statistically significant differential abundances for 35 proteins associated with the plasma membrane, most notably the pro-inflammatory proteins S100A8 and S100A9 which induce MDSC and promote their migration. We also tested whether the peptides associated with canonical pathways showed a statistically significant increase or decrease subject to heightened versus basal inflammatory conditions. Collectively, these studies used bottom-up proteomic analysis to identify plasma membrane associated pro-inflammatory molecules and pathways that drive MDSC accumulation, migration, and suppressive potency.

Keywords: Cell migration, Differential protein expression, Immune suppression, Inflammation, Mass spectrometry – LC-MS/MS, Myeloid-derived suppressor cells, Systems biology

1. Introduction

Chronic inflammation is associated with tumor promotion and progression [1, 2]. Previous studies have demonstrated that a group of immune suppressive cells, referred to as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), are induced by inflammation and strongly facilitate tumor growth and metastasis. MDSC are immature myeloid cells that exhibit potent suppressive activities for both innate and adaptive immunity [3]. In normal conditions, myeloid progenitor cells differentiate in the bone marrow, and the mature cells migrate to peripheral organs. However, in cancer, the immature MDSC traffic to the blood and peripheral organs and ultimately migrate into tumor sites [4]. Inflammatory mediators secreted by malignant cells and host cells are potent inducers of MDSC and heighten their immune suppressive activities [1,59].

It has been recognized that the inflammation-driven migration and accumulation of MDSC play important roles in the failure of cancer immunotherapy and that depletion of MDSC enhances the function of antitumor T-cell activities. A better understanding of molecular signaling between MDSC, tumor cells, T-cells, and inflammatory mediators is expected to contribute to the development of more effective cancer immunotherapies. Plasma membrane (PM) proteins of MDSC are potential targets for signaling mechanisms that activate these cells, and in this study we focus on the changes in the MDSC plasma membrane associated proteome when the level of inflammation is increased, as is commonly the case in some tumor microenvironments. We have employed MSbased semi-quantitative proteomic analysis to investigate the abundance differences between the PM associated proteins of MDSC induced in basal inflammatory and heightened inflammatory environments. The MDSC induced under lower levels of inflammation are designated “conventional MDSC;” while those induced under heightened levels of inflammation are denoted “inflammatory MDSC.” Both MDSC populations are obtained from BALB/c mice carrying 4T1 mammary carcinoma tumors and characterized by flow cytometry. Heightened inflammatory conditions were generated using 4T1 cells transfected with and expressing high levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β [8].

In this study, we use a nanoparticle pellicle technique to enrich PM proteins prior to MS and filter identified proteins using plasma membrane related Gene Ontology annotations. This analysis strategy identifies, as plasma membrane proteins, both integral cell surface proteins spanning the lipid bilayer and peripheral proteins not traditionally thought of as part of the PM. The pellicle method has been described previously and evaluated using Western blots and spectral counting [1016]. In each case, the technique resulted in the enrichment of PM proteins but identified both traditional PM proteins and proteins not traditionally considered part of the plasma membrane. We use a post-identification GObased filter to further focus the analysis on PM and PM associated proteins, as some of the proteins identified after the pellicle enrichment are not known to be associated with the PM.

2. Materials and methods

Iron (III) chloride (FeCl3·6H2O, 97.0%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA). Optima LC/MS grade acetonitrile, Poly(acrylic acid) (MW = 100 000) and protease inhibitor cocktail were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Trypsin and endoproteinase Lys-C were supplied by Promega (Madison, WI). RCDC™ protein assay kit was purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). TopTip C18 micro-spin columns were purchased from Glygen Corporation (Columbia, MD). Deionized water was produced using a Milli-Q A10 system (Millipore, Billerica, MA). BALB/c mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). The 4T1 cell line derived from a BALB/c spontaneous mammarycarcinoma[17]waskindlyprovidedbyDr.FredR.Miller from the Michigan Cancer Foundation.

2.1. Mice and cell lines

Wild type BALB/c mice were bred and maintained according to the NIH guidelines for the humane treatment of laboratory animals in the University of Maryland Baltimore County animal facility. All animal procedures were approved by the university’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The 4T1 mammary carcinoma cell line and the transfected 4T1/IL1β cell line were maintained as previously described [8,18].

2.2. MDSC harvesting and characterization

BALB/c mice were inoculated in the abdominal mammary gland with 4T1 or 4T1/IL1β tumor cells, and MDSC were harvested from the mice as described by Chornoguz et al. [9]. Briefly, mice with primary 4T1 or 4T1/IL1β tumors of ~7–10 mm in diameter and established metastatic disease were bled from the submandibular vein into heparinized tubes. Red blood cells were removed by lysis and the remaining leukocytes were used immediately or frozen at –80C until used. The percent of MDSC in the ex vivo leukocyte population was determined by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry using the fluorescent antibodies Gr1-FITC and CD11b-PE (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA) as described [9]. Individual biological samples consisted of MDSC pooled from two to three individual mice and consisted of >90% Gr1+ CD11b+ cells (see Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Representative flow cytometry analysis of conventional and inflammatory MDSC isolated from BALB/c mice with large 4T1 or 4T1/IL-1β mammary carcinoma tumors, labeled by immunofluorescence for the MDSC plasma membrane markers Gr1 and CD11b. (B) – (E) Morphology of the cells: (B) conventional MDSC, (C) Fe3O4 nanoparticle-coated conventional MDSC, (D) inflammatory MDSC, and (E) Fe3O4 nanoparticle-coated inflammatory MDSC.

2.3. Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles

Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized using the polyol method previously described by Ammar et al. [19,20]. Briefly, 1,2-propanediol solution containing 8 mM iron (III) chloride, 24 mM sodium acetate, and 2 mL water was refluxed for 15 h. The nanoparticles were extracted from solution with a neodymium magnet, washed with water and dispersed for 24 h in a solution of 20 mM Al(NO3)3 and 100 mM KNO3, adjusted to pH 7. The Al2O3 coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles were rinsed and briefly stored in PBMCA buffer (pH 7.4) until cell coating experiments were performed. Characterization of the particles was achieved with a JEOL JEM-2100F Field Emission TEM (JEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, MA) with scanning TEM and Oxford energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry capabilities, and a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 particle analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Worcestershire WR14 1XZ, UK). Analysis of the particle size showed an average diameter of 17 ± 6 nm. The surface charge was determined as a positive potential of 64 ± 3 mV. To further confirm the presence of the Al2O3 functional group, an elemental analysis was performed using an EDX measurement (Supporting Information Fig. 1).

2.4. Pellicle construction and cell lysis

The pellicle was constructed following our previously published procedure with minor modifications [10, 11]. Preparation of the plasma membrane pellicles on conventional and inflammatory MDSC was performed in parallel. Approximately 1×108 MDSC from each type were resuspended in 2 mL PMCBA (800 mM sorbitol, 20 mM MES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 5.3) and added dropwise to a 10% (w/v) Al2O3 coated Fe3O4 suspension. Coating was performed at 4°C by gently rocking the mixture for 15 min. Excess nanoparticles were removed by collecting the nanoparticle-coated cells at 900 × g for 5 min and washing three times. The coated cells were crosslinked by adding the suspension to 10 mg/mL poly(acrylic acid) in PMCBA, pH 6.0–6.5, in a dropwise fashion, and incubated at 4°C for 15 min with gentle rocking. The cross-linked cells were collected by centrifugation at 900 × g for 5 min and washed with PMCBA to remove excess poly(acrylic acid). The cell pellet was placed in 2.5 mM imidazole with protease inhibitor cocktail and incubated on ice for 30 min to swell the cells. Cell lysis was carried out by using N2 cavitation at 1500 psi for 30 min. The cell lysate was spun at 100 × g for 7 min to isolate the PM nanoparticle pellicles from cellular organelles and lysates, and washed three times with the lysis buffer, three times with 1 M Na2CO3, pH 11.4, and another three times with 1 M KCl. Proteins were released from the pellicles by triplicate extractions in 2% SDS, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, and 5% β-mercaptoethanol, at 100C for 5 min in a lab microwave oven (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC). The protein concentration was measured using an RCDC™ protein assay kit, prior to 1D-gel electrophoresis or proteolysis in-solution.

2.5. Scanning electron microscopy

Cells were prepared for imaging by a Hitachi SU-70 Field Emission scanning electron microscope and a Hitachi S-4700 Field Emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Gaithersburg, MD) as previously reported [10].

2.6. Proteomic analysis by HPLC-MS/MS

One hundred micrograms of protein recovered from the pellicle in 2% SDS was precipitated using chloroform/methanol [21], and resolubilized in 8 M urea in 50 mM NH4HCO3. The proteins were reduced and alkylated by iodoacetamide. Lys-C digestion was carried out in 8 M urea/50 mM NH4HCO3 solution at 37C for 3 h, using an enzyme to protein ratio of 1:50. After five-fold dilution, tryptic digestion was performed at 37°C for 16 h, using an enzyme to protein ratio of 1:25. The digests were desalted for LC-MS/MS analysis.

LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using a Shimadzu Prominence nanoHPLC (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD) interfaced to an LTQ-orbitrap XL (ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). Peptides from 15 μg proteins were fractionated in a Vydac Everest C18 column (150 μmm × 150 μm) with 300 Å pore size and 5 μm particle size (Grace Vydac, Deerfield, IL), using a flow rate of 500 nL/min. A linear gradient was increased from 0 to 60% solvent B (97.5% acetonitrile, 2.5% H2O, 0.1% formic acid) in 90 min, and then from 60 to 85% solvent B for 20 min. The samples were ionized using a spray voltage of +1.8 kV, a tube lens voltage of 100 kV, and a capillary temperature of 275°C. The mass spectrometer was operated in a data-dependent mode. Precursor ions were scanned in the orbitrap at a resolution set for 30 000 at m/z 400. In each cycle, the nine most abundant ions above the threshold of 50 000 ions were isolated for collision-induced dissociation (CID), using a normalized collision energy of 35 and an activation time of 30 ms, followed by product ion scans in the LTQ. The precursor ions were isolated using an isolation window of 3 Da. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with a repeat count of 1 and duration of 180 s. For label-free quantitation, two to six replicate injections were performed to maximize the identification of low abundance proteins, in the three biological replicates.

2.7. Bioinformatics

Spectra in RAW format were subjected to centroiding and mzXML reformatting using msconvert [22]. All data sets were searched against UniProt mouse reference proteome using PepArML [23, 24]. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was specified as a fixed modification, and oxidation of methionine residues specified as a variable modification. Search results were filtered at 1% spectral FDR. A global protein parsimony analysis was used to infer proteins, subject to at least two unshared peptides per protein, resulting in 428 inferred proteins with estimated protein FDR of 0.46% (Supporting Information Tables 1 and 2).

Subcellular localization of proteins was determined using UniProt Gene Ontology annotations [25] and an in-house GO Slim of specific GO cellular compartment terms, including “plasma membrane.” Cellular proteins are highly dynamic and are present in multiple organelles [26] – this is reflected in the GO cellular compartment annotations [27], curated from published manuscripts, which may result in proteins not traditionally considered membrane proteins receiving a “plasma membrane” annotation. In this study, proteins annotated via the GO Slim with “plasma membrane” were considered to be plasma membrane associated proteins and retained for differential protein and pathway analysis.

To compare protein abundance between treatments, inhouse software was developed to determine the spectral count, after spectral FDR-based filtering and protein parsimony analysis, of inferred proteins. Under the nullhypothesis that proteins in the two treatment conditions are not differentially abundant, we expect the spectral counts for a specific protein to reflect the total number of PSMs observed in each condition. Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate the statistical significance of the imbalance in the spectral counts for each protein [28]. To correct for multiple testing, the FDR was determined using the Benjamini-Hochberg method [29]. The ratio of spectral counts (RSC), which provides an estimate of the fold-change between two samples, was computed using the serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) [30] procedure, as described by Old et al. [31].

Pathway analysis was carried out using canonical pathway gene-sets from Molecular Signatures Databases (MSigDB) 4.0 [32] collection C2, which includes KEGG, REACTOME, and PID pathway databases. Since MSigDB provides genesets only for human genes, identified proteins’ UniProt accessions were first mapped to mouse genes and then to orthologous human genes, using the UniProt gene names and NCBI’s HomoloGene. Traditional pathway enrichment analysis of differentially abundant human genes was carried out using candidate gene-lists constructed using Fisher’s exact test FDR < 10% and increased, decreased, or increased and decreased spectral counts in inflammatory MDSC. The set of all identified genes was used as the pathway enrichment background. Fisher’s exact test, and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR, was used to assess the statistical significance of the number of genes in common between each canonical pathway and the various candidate gene-lists.

A novel peptide-based pathway analysis was also applied to canonical pathway gene-sets from MSigDB 4.0. Identified proteins were associated with human genes, as previously described. The number of distinct peptides associated with each gene-set’s genes were determined for conventional and inflammatory MDSC. To assess the statistical significance of the change in distinct peptide count for each treatment, Fisher’s exact test was applied to each pathway’s distinct peptide counts with respect to all distinct peptides, and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR computed to correct for multiple testing.

3. Results and discussion

Circulating MDSC were harvested from mice with 4T1 or 4T1/IL-1 tumors and stained with fluorescently coupled antibodies to the markers characteristic of MDSC (Gr1 and CD11b). Figure 1 indicates that around 93% of the cells used in the experiment are Gr1+CD11b+. Plasma membrane associate proteins from these highly purified MDSC were enriched by the pellicle technique using Al2O3-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Cell surface morphology of MDSC observed by SEM is shown in Fig. 1B and D. Both conventional and inflammatory MDSC exhibited extrusions of various sizes and microvilli. Observations of multiple cells indicate that there is no substantial change in morphology between the two types of MDSC. Most of the MDSC are approximately 5 m in diameter, smaller than many other types of cells. Micrographs in Fig. 1C and E indicate successful coating of the nanoparticles on the MDSC surfaces.

Protein analysis identified 140 PM associated proteins satisfying the two unshared peptide constraint in conventional MDSC and 164 PM associated proteins in inflammatory MDSC; of these 117 proteins are in common. In the combined dataset of plasma membrane annotated proteins, 191 proteins satisfy the two unshared peptide constraint (Supporting Information Tables 3 and 4).In the enriched samples about 45% of the identified UniProt proteins are annotated with the GO Slim term “plasma membrane.” Semi-quantitative analysis using spectral counting was performed on the pooled peptide identifications of conventional and inflammatory MDSC. Changes in protein abundance were calculated and normalized using serial analysis of gene expression, which provides a correction factor for the fold change to avoid discontinuity of the data in case that a given protein is identified in only one sample, and statistical significance assessed by Fisher’s exact test and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR (Supporting Information Table 5). Relative protein abundance expressed as log2 ratios between inflammatory and conventional MDSC (RSC) of absolute value greater than 1 and FDR less than 5% were considered to be significantly changed. From the total of 191 PM associated proteins identified, 22 proteins were shown to have significantly higher abundance in inflammatory MDSC (Table 1), and 13 proteins were observed to have significantly lower abundance (Table 2). Proteins S100A8 and S100A9 show the most significant increase. Previous studies suggest that S100A8 and S100A9 form a heterodimer in exosomes released by MDSC facilitate the migration of MDSC into the tumor microenvironment via an NF-B-dependent pathway [7, 34]. S100A8 and S100A9 also drive the accumulation of MDSC by inhibiting normal myelopoiesis via a STAT3-dependent pathway [33]. The increased abundances observed here are in agreement with a previous report in which western blotting demonstrated increases in the level of S100A8/S100A9 in the inflammatory environment [7].

Table 1.

Plasma membrane associated proteins with significant increase of abundance in response to inflammation (|RSC| ≥ 1 and Fisher’s exact test FDR ≤ 5%)

Accession Gene Description |RSC| FDR
P27005 S100a8 Protein S100-A8 1.75 8.04E-33
P31725 S100a9 Protein S100-A9 1.24 5.78E-21
Q00612 G6pdx Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase X 2.02 1.63E-12
P11276 Fn1 Fibronectin 4.99 6.77E-12
Q61233 Lcp1 Plastin-2 1.75 7.06E-12
P52480 Pkm Pyruvate kinase PKM 1.29 7.72E-11
Q8VCM7 Fgg Fibrinogen gamma chain 4.12 1.54E-10
Q8K0E8 Fgb Fibrinogen beta chain 4.78 2.17E-10
P40124 Cap1 Adenylyl cyclase-associated protein 1 1.36 4.24E-08
P20152 Vim Vimentin 2.62 5.03E-05
P26041 Msn Moesin 1.45 7.09E-05
Q61096 Prtn3 Myeloblastin 1.51 1.10E-04
Q9WVK4 Ehd1 EH domain-containing protein 1 3.46 5.94E-04
P04919 Slc4a1 Band 3 anion transport protein 1.37 8.69E-04
Q61210 Arhgef1 Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 2.51 9.71E-04
Q8CIZ8 Vwf von Willebrand factor 3.23 2.39E-03
Q9CVB6 Arpc2 Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 2 2.34 3.35E-03
P11499 Hsp90ab1 Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta 1.00 9.37E-03
Q63844 Mapk3 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 2.95 9.85E-03
P26040 Ezr Ezrin 1.07 2.57E-02
O08808 Diaph1 Protein diaphanous homolog 1 1.15 2.87E-02
Q9QUM0 Itga2b Integrin alpha-IIb 2.20 3.46E-02

Table 2.

Plasma membrane associated proteins with significant decrease of abundance in response to inflammation (|RSC| ≥ 1 and Fisher’s exact test FDR ≤ 5%)

Accession Gene Description |RSC| FDR
P28293 Ctsg Cathepsin G 1.78 6.83E-13
Q8VDN2 Atp1a1 Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-1 2.67 4.13E-09
P08752 Gnai2 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) subunit alpha-2 1.03 3.11E-07
Q9QXS1 Plec Plectin 2.67 4.46E-06
P51437 Camp Cathelin-related antimicrobial peptide 1.30 3.91E-05
Q5SUA5 Myo1g Unconventional myosin-Ig 1.45 1.37E-04
P24063 Itgal Integrin alpha-L 1.75 1.39E-04
Q61735 Cd47 Leukocyte surface antigen CD47 1.28 1.71E-03
P57787 Slc16a3 Monocarboxylate transporter 4 1.28 2.26E-03
Q62178 Sema4a Semaphorin-4A 2.48 1.46E-02
P04104 Krt1 Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 1 1.03 1.52E-02
Q61462 Cyba Cytochrome b-245 light chain 1.81 1.98E-02
Q9JIZ9 Plscr3 Phospholipid scramblase 3 1.85 2.98E-02

Pathway enrichment analysis was carried out using differentially abundant PM associated proteins and the canonical pathways of the MSigDB C2 collection. After mapping UniProt mouse protein accessions to human genes, a total of 183 genes were considered identified and used as the background genelist, with 31 genes increased and 32 decreased in inflammatory MDSC. A total of 1320 canonical pathways from KEGG, REACTOME, and PID were evaluated for a statistically surprising high (or low) number of genes intersecting with increased, decreased, or increased and decreased candidate gene lists using Fisher’s exact test at 10% FDR (Supporting Information Table 6). Unfortunately, given the small magnitude of the candidate and background genelists, no pathways were found to have a statistically significant number of intersecting genes after multiple test correction. A similar analysis was carried out on the UniProt mouse protein accessions using the DAVID Bioinformatics tool, with a similar lack of statistically significant pathways observed (data not shown).

A novel peptide-based pathway analysis strategy was implemented for a more sensitive detection of perturbed pathways than the traditional approach. Mouse peptides originally identified from mouse protein sequences were associated with MSigDB 4.0 C2 collection canonical pathways via mouse, then human genes. Distinct peptides, tabulated for each pathway gene-set for conventional vs inflammatory MDSC, can be formed into a contingency matrix for Fisher’s exact test. The test determines whether a gene set’s distinct peptide count specific to inflammatory or conventional MDSC is surprisingly high or low. If the genes of a gene-set are not differentially abundant, the number of treatment specific gene-set distinct peptides should be consistent with the total number of conventional or inflammatory specific distinct peptides. We evaluate treatment specific peptides as some peptides are common to both treatments. Table 3 and Supporting Information Table 7 show the MSigDB canonical pathways with at least four identified genes and Fisher’s exact test FDR less than 1% for differential peptide counts. This approach identifies 13 canonical pathways with more distinct peptides than expected in inflammatory MDSC, and three canonical pathways with less distinct peptides than expected in conventional MDSC.

Table 3.

Canonical pathways with significant increase or decrease of distinct peptides in response to inflammation. Pathways with an increase (decrease) in distinct peptides under inflammatory treatment shown above (below) the dotted line

Database: Description Identified genes Conventional peptides Inflammatory peptides FDR
PID: Beta1 integrin cell surface interactions 4 1 24 5.01E-09
PID: Beta3 integrin cell surface interactions 6 4 30 9.49E-09
KEGG: Pathways in cancer 12 22 62 1.79E-07
KEGG: ECM-receptor interaction 5 3 22 5.15E-06
REACTOME: Response to elevated platelet cytosolic Ca2+ 13 60 111 3.15E-05
KEGG: Prostate cancer 5 10 31 2.94E-04
KEGG: NOD-like receptor signaling pathway 4 9 29 2.94E-04
PID: Integrins in angiogenesis 4 6 24 6.65E-04
BIOCARTA: How Progesterone Initiates Oocyte Membrane 4 7 25 1.18E-03
REACTOME: Platelet activation, signaling and aggregation 24 103 157 1.52E-03
REACTOME: Innate immune system 5 13 32 3.19E-03
PID: Syndecan-4-mediated signaling events 6 14 35 5.44E-03
KEGG: Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection 6 54 81 6.04E-03

PID: Integrin family cell surface interactions 4 71 49 1.53E-04
PID: amb2 Integrin signaling 8 112 97 2.02E-05
KEGG: Cell adhesion molecules 4 97 53 1.24E-08

We point out that the pathways found to be statistically significant in the peptide-based analysis were also evaluated by the traditional candidate gene-list based pathway enrichment analysis, but were not statistically significant. For example, the most significant of the gene-sets listed in Table 3 by the traditional approach is “REACTOME: Response to elevated platelet cytosolic Ca2+,” which shares seven genes with the candidate gene-list defined by increased spectral counts (at FDR 10%) in inflammatory MDSC, resulting in (uncorrected) Fisher’s exact test p-value 1.72E-3 and multiple-test corrected FDR of 0.57, which is not statistically significant. The most significant pathway of Table 3, “PID: Beta1 integrin cell surface interactions” has (uncorrected) p-value 0.016 using traditional pathway enrichment analysis, based on three genes in common with the same candidate gene-list of differentially abundant genes, also not significant once adjusted for multiple-testing. Importantly, in addition to the apparent improvement in sensitivity provided by the peptide-based approach, the peptide-based strategy does not require the somewhat arbitrary selection of thresholds for candidate gene-lists of differentially abundant genes (or proteins).

In the peptide-based analysis, the majority of the significant pathways involve members of the integrin family. Integrins, in general, are membrane glycoproteins known to regulate cellular migration and communication in the extracellular matrix [32]. Several proteins from the integrin family have been recognized in MDSC and proposed as cell surface markers for sub-populations, and one of the canonical markers of MDSC, CD11b, is an integrin [35,36]. Although little is known about the functions of integrins in MDSC, published reports have revealed that other myeloid cells express integrins which facilitate their migration to the tumor microenvironment [37,38]. Since MDSC are present at high levels within solid tumors and must migrate to tumors from the bone marrow and blood, it is likely that integrins, such as those identified in this study, are involved in MDSC localization.

4. Concluding remarks

We have integrated a plasma membrane enrichment technique with label-free semi-quantitative proteomic analysis to characterize changes in abundances of plasma membrane associated proteins when MDSC are stimulated by enhanced inflammation. This work confirms by direct measurement that the abundances of the chemotactic proteins S100A8 and S100A9 are increased in the presence of inflammation. We also show (Table 3) that inflammation is associated with increases in the abundances of proteins involved in several pathways that are classically associated with cell migration [3538].Our observations provide mechanistic support for the hypothesis that inflammation stimulates migration of MDSC into the tumor microenvironment.

Supplementary Material

985682
985682i
985682a
985682b
985682c
985682d
985682e
985682f
985682g
985682h

Significance of the study.

This study applies a bottom-up proteomics analysis of plasma membrane associated proteins derived from mouse tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) generated under heightened inflammatory conditions. Inflammatory mediators secreted by malignant cells and host cells induce MDSC and heighten their suppressive potency of innate and adaptive immunity. The workflow uses a previously described pellicle method to enrich plasma membrane associated proteins from the MDSC, and compares protein abundance in basal vs. heightened inflammatory conditions using spectral counting. Statistical significance of differentially abundant proteins is assessed using Fisher’s exact test. Pro-inflammatory and chemotactic proteins S100A8 and S100A9 are observed to be associated with the MDSC plasma membrane, where they are readily available for intercellular signaling, and demonstrate significantly increased abundance under inflammatory conditions. A novel pathway analysis strategy, also using Fisher’s exact test, was used to identify significantly perturbed canonical pathways including a number related to integrin signaling, elucidating functional elements of the complex process of immunosuppression.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Yan Wang, Director of Proteomic Core Facility, Maryland Pathogen Research Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, for advice about the LC-MS/MS analysis, Dr. SungKyoung Kim for advice about the synthesis of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles, and Ms. Virginia Clements for technical support in generating MDSC. We acknowledge Tim Maugel, Director of the Laboratory for Biological Ultrastructure, University of Maryland, College Park, for advice about SEM imaging. This research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, GM 021248. S.B.L. also thanks to the WCU program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, R31–2008- 000–10071-0. W.C. acknowledges a Royal Thai Government Fellowship. We acknowledge the support of the Maryland NanoCenter and its NispLab. The NispLab is supported in part by the National Science Foundation as an MRSEC Shared Experimental Facility.

Abbreviations:

IL-1β

interleukin-1 beta

MDSC

myeloid-derived suppressor cells

PM

plasma membrane

PMCBA

plasma membrane coating buffer A

PSM

peptide-spectrum-matches

SAGE

serial analysis of gene expression

Footnotes

The authors declare that they have no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher’s web-site

5 References

  • [1].Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Sinha P, Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: linking inflammation and cancer. J. Immunol 2009, 182, 4499–4506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Lu H, Ouyang W, Huang C, Inflammation, a key event in cancer development. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006, 4, 221–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Marx J, Cancer immunology. Cancer’s bulwark against immune attack: MDS cells. Science 2008, 319, 154–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S, Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol 2009, 9, 162–174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Bronte V, Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat. Rev. Immunol 2012, 12, 253–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Markiewski MM, DeAngelis RA, Benencia F, RicklinLichtsteiner SK et al. , Modulation of the antitumor immune response by complement. Nat.Immunol 2008, 9, 1225–1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Sinha P, Okoro C, Foell D, Freeze HH et al. , Proinflammatory S100 proteins regulate the accumulation of myeloidderived suppressor cells. J. Immunol 2008, 181, 4666–4675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Bunt SK, Sinha P, Clements VK, Leips J, OstrandRosenberg S, Inflammation induces myeloid-derived suppressor cells that facilitate tumor progression. J. Immunol 2006, 176, 284–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Chornoguz O, Grmai L, Sinha P, Artemenko KA et al. , Proteomic pathway analysis reveals inflammation increases myeloid-derived suppressor cell resistance to apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, M110 002980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Choksawangkarn W, Kim SK, Cannon JR, Edwards NJ et al. , Enrichment of plasma membrane proteins using nanoparticle pellicles: comparison between silica and higher density nanoparticles. J. Proteome Res 2013, 12, 1134–1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Rahbar AM, Fenselau C, Integration of Jacobson’s pellicle method into proteomic strategies for plasma membrane proteins. J. Proteome Res 2004, 3, 1267–1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Rahbar AM, Fenselau C, Unbiased examination of changes in plasma membrane proteins in drug resistant cancer cells. J. Proteome Res 2005, 4 (6), 2148–2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Chaney LK, Jacobson BS, Coating cells with colloidal silica for high yield isolation of plasma membrane sheets and identification of transmembrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem 1983, 258, 10062–10072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Kim SK, Choksawangkarn W, Rose R, Fenselau C et al. , Nanowire pellicles for eukaryotic cells: nanowire coating and interaction with cells. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2013, 9(8):1171–1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Smolders K, Lombaert N, Valkenborg D, Baggerman G et al. , An effective plasma membrane proteomics approach for small tissue samples. Scientific Reports 2015, 5, 10917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Sharma P, Abbasi C, Lazic S, Teng ACT et al. , Evolutionarily conserved intercalated disc protein Tmem65 regulates cardiac conduction and connexin 43 function. Nature Communications 2015, 6, 8391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Aslakson CJ, Miller FR, Selective events in the metastatic process defined by analysis of the sequential dissemination of subpopulations of a mouse mammary tumor. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 1399–1405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Pulaski BA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Reduction of established spontaneous mammary carcinoma metastases following immunotherapy with major histocompatibility complex class II and B7.1 cell-based tumor vaccines. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 1486–1493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Ammar S, Helfen A, Jouini N, Fievet F et al. , Magnetic properties of ultrafine cobalt ferrite particles synthesized by hydrolysis in a polyol medium. J. Mater. Chem 2001, 11, 186–192. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Bai X, Son SJ, Zhang S, Liu W et al. , Synthesis of superparamagnetic nanotubes as MRI contrast agents and for cell labeling. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 2008, 3, 163–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Wessel D, Flugge UI, A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal. Biochem 1984, 138, 141–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Kessner D, Chambers M, Burke R, Agus D et al. , ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24, 2534–2536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Edwards N, Wu X, Tseng TW, An unsupervised, modelfree, machine-learning combiner for peptide identifications from tandem mass spectra. Clinical Proteomics 2009, 5, 23–36. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Edwards NJ, PepArML, a meta-search peptide identification platform for tandem mass spectra. Current Protocols Bioinformatics 2013, 44, 231–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D et al. , Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Jang JH, Hanash S, Profiling of the cell surface proteome. Proteomics 2003, 3, 1947–1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Huntley RP, Sawford T, Mutowo-Meullenet P, Shypitsyna A et al. , The GOA database: Gene ontology annotation updates for 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43 (D1), D1057–D1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Zhang B, VerBerkmoes NC, Langston MA, Uberbacher E et al. , Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 2909–2918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Benjamini YHY, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Beissbarth T, Hyde L, Smyth GK, Job C et al. , Statistical modeling of sequencing errors in SAGE libraries. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20 Suppl 1, i31–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Old WM, Meyer-Arendt K, Aveline-Wolf L, Pierce KG et al. , Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1487–1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, et al BL., Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2005, 102, 15545–15550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Cheng P, Corzo CA, Luetteke N, Yu B et al. , Inhibition of dendritic cell differentiation and accumulation of myeloidderived suppressor cells in cancer is regulated by S100A9 protein. J. Exp. Med 2008, 205, 2235–2249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Burke M, Choksawangkarn W, Edwards N, OstrandRosenberg S, Fenselau C Exosomes from myeloid derived suppressor cells carry biologically active proteins. J. Proteome Res 2014, 13, 836–843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Schmid MC, Varner J, Myeloid cells in tumor inflammation. Vascular Cell 2012, 4, 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Haile LA, Gamrekelashvili J, Manns MP, Korangy F et al. , CD49d is a new marker for distinct myeloid-derived suppressor cell subpopulations in mice. J. Immunol 2010, 185, 203–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Avraamides CJ, Garmy-Susini B, Varner JA, Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 604–617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, Firtel RA et al. , Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 2003, 302, 1704–1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

985682
985682i
985682a
985682b
985682c
985682d
985682e
985682f
985682g
985682h

RESOURCES