Abstract
The morbidity caused by viper bites is very dangerous and the anti-venom therapy couldn't treat the local injures such as hemorrhage, edema, necrosis and inflammation of bitten tissues. Searching for safe and effective anti-venom compounds from natural sources is very important. This study was designed to explore the neutralizing ability of Rosmarinus officinalis L. leaves aqueous extract (RMAE) against Egyptian Cerastes cerastes (Cc) viper venom toxicity. The RMAE contained a considerable amount of phenolic and flavonoid contents with 3,300 and 800 mg/100 g dry weight, respectively. The RMAE showed a considerable variation of phenolic acids by using HPLC technique. Rosmarinic acid is the major component of the RMAE which recorded 400 mg/100 g dry weight and 64% of all the identified compounds. In vitro, the RMAE neutralized the enzymatic activities of proteases, l-amino acid oxidases, and phospholipases A2 of the Cc venom dose-dependently. In addition, the RMAE effectively neutralized the gelatinolytic, fibrinogenolytic, hemolytic and procoagulant activities of Cc venom. In vivo, the RMAE markedly reduced lethality, hemorrhage, edema, muscle and liver toxicities induced by Cc venom. In conclusion, the venom neutralizing property of the RMAE gives a new prospect for efficient treatment of the lethal viper bites.
Keywords: Cerastes cerastes, Venom, Enzymes, Lethality, Rosmarinus officinalis L., Neutralization
Graphical abstract

1. Introduction
Snake bite is still a common medical human health problem in many tropical and subtropical areas of the world, especially in northern Africa, southern Asia, Latin America and Middle East resulting in high mortality and morbidity.1 More than 90% of snake venom composition is toxic proteins, which includes mainly the enzymes of phospholipases A2, hemorrhagic metalloproteases, l-amino acid oxidases and hyaluronidases. These enzymes implicated in a series of dangerous events happened in the victim's body following the envenomation.2 The Egyptian desert horned viper (Cerastes cerastes) is the most distinctive and plenty viper of North Africa and the Middle East deserts. Envenomings by Cerastes cerastes viper caused local tissue injuries, such as swelling, blistering, hemorrhage and necrosis of skeletal muscles, which occasionally leading to amputation of the injured limb.3
Anti-venoms are the only specific medication of snake bites; however, they have many disadvantages such as high cost, hypersensitivity, non-availability and their limitation in the neutralization of local tissue damage. Degradation of local tissue damage is a nonstop process which is prolonged even after the administration of anti-venoms.4 So, the searching for supplementary/alternative snake bite remedies is fundamental.5 Plant extracts have an amazing mixture of diverse active compounds. These compounds possess diverse pharmacological activities which they can bind with the toxins/enzymes leads to the neutralization/inhibition of their activities.6
Rosemarinus officinalis L. (rosemary) is an evergreen perennial aromatic shrub belonging to the family Lamiaceae. Previously, rosemary was grown in the north and south coasts of the Mediterranean Sea but now it is cultivated all over the world as an aromatic plant. Rosemary leaves are used for food flavoring and in folk medicine such as antispasmodic, dysmenorrhoea, relieving respiratory disorders and heart diseases, analgesic, antirheumatic, carminative, cholagogue, diuretic, antiepileptic, stimulate the growth of hair and treatment of eczema of the scalp, boils and wounds.7, 8, 9 It also had anti-proliferative effect against cancer cells, high antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetogenic and hepatoprotective activities.10, 11, 12, 13 Previously, we demonstrated that the rosemary leaves aqueous extract had potent hyaluronidase inhibitory effect among several medicinal plants tested in this study.14 From this standpoint, the present study aims to evaluate the anti-venom properties of rosemary leaf aqueous extract against Egyptian Cerastes cerastes viper venom toxicity using both in vitro and in vivo assays.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant collection
Rosmarinus officinalis L. (rosemary) plant was collected from Horticulture Institute Research, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Cairo, Egypt. It was authenticated by Dr. M. Salah (Professor, Botany department, ARC, Cairo, Egypt). A voucher specimen was deposited in the herbarium of the same department under the number ARC/42014.
2.2. Plant extraction
Rosemary leaves were thoroughly washed with water, shade-dried and grounded into coarse powder. Five grams of rosemary leaves powder were soaked in 20 ml distilled water (w/v) overnight at room temperature with constant stirring. The obtained extract was filtered using Whatman filter paper No. 1. Then, the extract was centrifuged, lyophilized and dissolved in least volume of 0.1 % DMSO and designated as rosemary aqueous extract (RMAE).
2.3. Animals
Male Swiss-albino mice weighing 20 ± 1 g were used for this study. All animals were maintained at the animal house, National Research Centre (NRC), under standard conditions and diet. Experiments were carried out with prior permission from the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee, NRC, Egypt.
2.4. Snake venom and chemicals
Cerastes cerastes (Cc) venom was milked from adult vipers which collected from El-Faiyum, Egypt. Directly after extraction, the venom was pooled, divided in aliquots, lyophilized, and stored at –20 °C. Azocasein, tricholoroacetic acid, Tris base, acrylamide, bis-acrylamide, fibrinogen, gelatin, coomassie brilliant blue R-250, l-Leucine and o-phenylenediamine (OPD) were obtained from sigma. ALT and AST diagnostic kits were purchased from Biodiagnostic Co., Egypt. All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade. The buffers were prepared according to Gomorie15 and the final pH was checked by pH meter (Hanna, pH 211 Microprocessor pH meter).
2.5. Total phenolic content estimation
The total phenolic content was measured according to Velioglu et al.16 Fifty μL of the rosemary aqueous extract (RMAE) was mixed with 100 μL Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, 850 μL of distalled water and allowed to stand for 5 min at ambient temperature. A 500 μL of 20% sodium carbonate was added and the mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Absorbance was measured at 750 nm. Gallic acid was used as standard for the calibration curve and total phenolic content was expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g dry weight.
2.6. Total flavonoid content estimation
The total flavonoid content was determined using modified colorimetric method described previously by Zhishen et al.17 and used catechin as a standard. RMAE (250 μL) was mixed with 1.25 μL distilled water and 75 μL of 5 % NaNO2 solution. After 6 min, 150 μL of 10% AlCl3 solution was added to the mixture. 0.5 ml of 1 M NaOH and 275 μL of distilled water were added to the mixture 5 min later. The absorbance of the solutions was measured at 510 nm. The results were expressed as mg catechin equivalent (CE)/100 g dry weight.
2.7. HPLC analysis of phenolic compounds
The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was carried out for RMAE according to Kim et al.,18 using an Agilent Technologies 1100 series liquid chromatography equipped with an auto sampler and a diode-array detector. The separation and determination were performed on XDB- C18 column (150 × 4.6 μm). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (solvent A) and 2% acetic acid in water (v/v) (solvent B). The total run time was 70 min at flow rate one ml/min with gradient programmed as follows: 100 to 85% (in 30 min), 85 to 50% (in 20 min), 50 to 0% (in 5 min) and 0 to 100% (in 5 min) of solvent B. There was 10 min of post-run for reconditioning. The obtained peaks were monitored simultaneously at 280, 320 and 360 nm. All samples were filtered through a 0.45 μm Acrodisc syringe filter (Gelman Laboratory, MI) before injection. Peaks were identified by congruent retention times and UV spectra and compared with the standards (Fig. 1A and B).
Fig. 1.
(A) HPLC profile of Phenolic compounds as standards at 280 nm. (1) pyrogallol, (2) gallic, (3) protochatchuic, (4) p-hydroxybenzoic, (5) gentisic, (6) catachine, (7) chlorgenic, (8) caffic, (9) syrngic, (10) vanillic, (11) scoplatine, (12) ferulic, (13) sinapic, (14) rutin, (15) p-coumaric, (16) naringeen, (17) hisperdin, (18) apeginin-7-glucoside, (19) myrcetin, (20) rosmarinic, (21) cinnamic, (22) qurcetin, (23) apegnin, (24) kaempferol, and (25) chyrsin. (B) HPLC profile of the RMAE at 280 nm. The major peak is at Rtime of 40 min corresponding to rosmarinic acid (RA).
2.8. Protease inhibition
2.8.1. Azocasein assay
The caseinolytic activity was determined according to Lemos et al.19 with slight modifications. One ml assay reaction mixture containing 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.5, 0.2% azocasein and 5 μg of crude venom was incubated 1 h at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.1 ml of 10% (TCA), followed by centrifugation at 5,000×g for 5 min and the absorbance was recorded at 366 nm. One unit of proteolytic activity was defined as the increase in the absorbance at 366 nm of 0.1 after 1 h in the test reaction compared with the control reaction. For inhibition studies, 5 μg of the crude venom was pre-incubated with various ratios of RMAE (1:0, 1:2, 1:4, 1:6, 1:8 and 1:10) for 30 min at 37 °C and the residual activity was measured according standard assay condition.
2.8.2. Gelatin zymography
Gelatin Zymogram was performed in 12% native polyacrylamide gel containing 2 mg/mL gelatin according to Bee et al.20 The conditions of electrophoresis were carried out according to Laemmli.21 Then, the gel was incubated overnight at 37 °C in 20 mM Tris -HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4. The gel was stained by 0.1% Coomassie brilliant blue in a solution of methanol: acetic acid: water in 45:10:45 (v: v: v) and the de-stained by the same solution. For inhibition experiments, 30 μg of the crude venom was pre-incubated with different ratios of RMAE (1:2.5, 1:5, 1:10 and 1:20) for 30 min at 37 °C then performed according to the method previously described.
2.9. l-amino acid oxidase inhibition
The microplate assay for l-amino acid oxidase (LAAO) activity was conducted as described by Kishimoto and Takahashi22 with slight modifications. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM of Tris–HCl buffer, pH 8.0, 5 mM l-leucine as substrate, horseradish peroxidase (5 IU/mL) and 2 mM orthophenylenediamine (as substrate for peroxidase). Venom Sample (2 μg) was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and the reaction was stopped by adding 50 μL of 2N H2SO4. The absorbance was recorded at 490 nm by ELISA reader. One unit of LAAO activity was the amount of enzyme which produces 1 μmol of H2O2. The inhibition experiments were performed by pre-incubated 2 μg of Cc venom with different ratios of RMAE (1:0, 1:2, 1:4, 1:6, 1:8, and 1:10) for 30 min at 37 °C. The residual activity was measured according standard assay condition. Crude venom was considered as 100% activity.
2.10. Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) inhibition
PLA2 activity was determined using egg yolk as PLA2 substrate (lecithin) according to Marinetti.23 Briefly, the assay was carried out by using egg yolk suspension diluted in saline (1:5 w/v). Crude venom sample (200 μg) alone or pre-incubated with different ratios of RMAE (1:0, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4) for 30 min at 37 °C was added to one ml of egg yolk working suspension to a final assay mixture volume of 5 ml with saline and the absorbance was recorded each 5 min for 15 min at 900 nm.
PLA2 activity was also carried out according to Gutierrez et al.24 Briefly, 200 μg of crude Cc venom was loaded into 3 mm diameter wells of 1% agarose plates containing 4% washed human erythrocytes, 4% egg yolk suspension and 10 mM CaCl2. The fortified agarose-egg yolk plate was incubated for 20 h at 37 °C. The PLA2 inhibition was calculated by measuring the zone of clearance around the haloes in the presence and absence of venom/RMAE ratios (1:0, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, and 1:5). PLA2 activity of venom in the absence of RMAE served as positive control.
2.11. Hemolytic inhibition
The hemolytic activity was evaluated according to the method of Abdulla et al.25 Briefly, a pre-warmed assay mixture containing 100 μl of egg yolk suspension (diluted 1:5 in 0.9% isotonic saline), 1 ml of washed human erythrocytes [(2.5% (v/v)], 3.8 ml of hemolytic buffer (1 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5 containing 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM KCl and 10 mM CaCl2) and crude venom (5 μg) alone or pre-incubated with different ratios of RMAE (1:0, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20, and 1:30) for 30 min at 37 °C. The reaction was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min and the amount of hemoglobin released in the supernatant was estimated at 540 nm.
2.12. Coagulant inhibition
The plasma coagulation activity was assayed according to Angulo et al.26 Two hundred μl of platelet poor human citrated plasma was incubated with 1 μg of Cc venom in 0.05 M phosphate buffer saline, pH 7.5 for 10 min at 37 °C. Then, 20 μl of 0.25 M CaCl2 was added and the clotting time was recorded. The inhibition experiments were performed by pre-incubated venom sample with different ratios of RMAE (1:0, 1:2.5, 1:5, 1:10, and 1:20) for 30 min at 37 °C and the clotting time in sec was recorded.
2.13. Fibrinogen degradation
Fibrinogenase activity was assayed according to Ouyang and Teng.27 The plasma fibrinogen (2 mg/ml) in 5 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 10 mM NaCl was mixed and incubated with 5 μg of the venom at 37 °C for 2 h. Then, 0.1 ml of the incubation solution was added to 0.1 ml of stopping solution (10M urea, 4% SDS, and 4% 2-mercaptoethanol). The samples were analyzed on 10% SDS-PAGE according to Laemmli.21 The inhibition experiments were performed by pre-incubated venom sample with ratios of RMAE (1:0, 1:10, 1:20 and 1:40) for 30 min at 37 °C, and then performed according to the method previously described.
2.14. Neutralization of lethal potency of Cc venom
The median lethal dose (LD50) of Cc venom was determined according to the method of Meier and Theakston.28 Groups of 5 mice were injected intraperitonially (i.p) with different concentrations of venom (2–32 μg protein/mouse) in 0.5 ml of saline. Then, the survival time of each animal in each set was recorded for 24 h. LD50 was calculated by the comparison of doses injected, with the observed survival time within 24 h. In neutralization studies, eight groups (n = 5), the groups from 1 to 4 were injected i.p with doses of the 1/2 LD50, 1 LD50, 2 LD50 and 4 LD50 of Cc venom alone respectively. Whereas, groups from 5 to 8 were injected with 1/2 LD50, 1 LD50, 2 LD50 and 4 LD50 venom, respectively and after 10 min following venom injection 0.5 mg/ml of RMAE were injected i.p. Two control groups were received either saline or 0.5 mg of RMAE, respectively. The survival time was recorded.
2.15. Neutralization of hemorrhagic activity
Hemorrhagic activity was determined according to the method of Kondo et al.29 using seven groups (n = 5) of mice. The samples were injected dorsally and intradermally in 100 μl of saline. Briefly, the first group received 1 μg (2 MHD) of Cc venom alone and groups 2, 3, 4, 5 received the pre-incubated venom sample (2 MHD) with different ratios of RMAE (1:5, 1:10, 1:20 and 1:40), respectively for 30 min at 37 °C. Groups 6 and 7 received either RMAE or saline as controls. Skins were removed after 2 h and the diameters of the hemorrhagic spots were measured on the inside surfaces.
2.16. Neutralization of edema activity
Edema inducing activity was carried out according to the method of Vishwanath et al.30 Six groups of five mice were injected intramuscular into the right footpads with final volume of 100 μl saline. Group 1 was injected with 20 μg (5 MED) of Cc venom, groups 2, 3, 4, 5 were injected with pre-incubated different ratios of venom: RMAE (w/w) (1:5, 1:10, 1:20 and 1:40), respectively for 30 min at 37 °C. The sixth group was injected with 0.25 mg/ml of RMAE alone and the left footpads received equal volume of saline as controls. The footpad thickness was measured after 1 h and the MED defined as amount of venom required to cause edema ratio of 120%.
2.17. In vivo neutralization of myotoxicity of Cc venom
The myotoxicity was determined according to the method of Gutierrez et al.31 Four groups of five mice were used in absence and presence of RMAE. Group 1 was injected intramuscularly with 2LD50 of Cc venom alone. Group 2 injected with 0.5 mg/ml of RMAE after 10 min of the venom injection. Groups 3 and 4 were injected with saline and RMAE as control, respectively. The mice were anesthetized by diethyl ether inhalation after 1 h and the abdominal cavities were opened to draw the blood from vena cava. A piece of skeletal muscle tissue at the venom injected spot was taken and immediately processed for histopathological studies. The collected serum was assayed for creatine phosphokinase (CPK, EC 2.7.3.2) activity using diagnostic kit. Activities were expressed as IU/L.
2.18. Histo-pathological studies in mice
Four groups of mice (n = 5) were injected i.p. for pathological study. Group 1 received 2LD50 of Cc venom alone and group 2 was injected after 10 min of venom injection with 0.5 mg/ml of RMAE. Groups 3 and 4 received RMAE and saline alone, respectively, as control. The mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the liver was taken, fixed in 10% formalin solution and dehydrated in a grade alcohol series 24 h and then embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 4–5 μm thickness were stained with hematoxylin–eosin for pathological studies as described by Kiernan.32 The photographs were taking using digital camera attached to the microscope. In addition, the collected serum was assayed for ALT (EC 2.6.1.2) and AST (EC 2.6.1.1) activities using Bio-diagnostic kit.
2.19. Statistical analysis
The analysis was performed with one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Dennett's post hoc test. Values of P < 0.01 were considered significant. Further, the results are represented in the form of mean ± S.D.
3. Results
3.1. Total phenolic, flavonoid contents and HPLC analysis of the RMAE
The total phenolic and flavonoid contents of rosemary aqueous extract (RMAE) were found to be 3,300 mg GAE/100 g and 800 mg CE/100 g, respectively, Table 1. The compounds of RMAE were identified and quantified by HPLC technique and presented in Table 2. The results indicated that the rosmarinic acid (RA) is the major compound of the RMAE (Fig. 1 B). RA represented 400 mg/100 g dry weight and 64 % of all the identified compounds, whereas the minor components were hisperidin, p-coumaric acid, apeginin, myrcetin, caffeic acid, catachine, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, rutin, apeginin-7-glucoside, cholorgenic acid, syrngic acid, ferulic acid, cinnamic acid and vanillic acid. The results indicated that the most of the RMAE components were phenolic acids.
Table 1.
Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of RMAE.
| Sample | Total phenolics mg GAE/100 g dry weight | Total flavonoids mg CE/100 g dry weight |
|---|---|---|
| RMAE | 3,300 ± 120 | 800 ± 112 |
GAE, gallic acid equivalent, CE, catchin equivalent values are presented as means ± SD (n = 3).
Table 2.
HPLC analysis of phenolic compounds of RMAE.
| Compounds | mg/100 g | Percentage % |
|---|---|---|
| p-hydroxybenzoic | 7.6 | 1.2 |
| Catachine | 9.6 | 1.5 |
| Cholorgenic | 4 | 0.64 |
| Caffeic | 12 | 1.92 |
| Syrngic | 3.5 | 0.56 |
| Vanillic | 0.355 | 0.056 |
| Ferulic | 1.2 | 0.19 |
| Rutin | 7.5 | 1.2 |
| p-Coumaric | 50 | 8 |
| Hisperidin | 54.2 | 8.7 |
| Apeginin-7-glucoside | 7 | 1.1 |
| Myricetin | 19.2 | 3 |
| Rosmarinic | 400 | 64.5 |
| Cinnamic | 0.92 | 0.147 |
| Apeginin | 45.7 | 7.3 |
3.2. Protease inhibition
The RMAE inhibited the Cc venom protease activity dose dependently. The extract could inhibit 50% (IC50) and 100% of the venom protease activity at venom: RMAE ratios 1:4 and 1:10 (w/w), respectively (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the inhibition of protease was proven by the zymogram analysis in Fig. 2B, where high protease activity of Cc venom on gelatin was shown as clear zone in lane 1. The RMAE reduced the clear zones of activity dose dependently and the complete inhibition of protease activity was achieved at venom: RMAE ratio of 1:20.
Fig. 2.
(A) Protease inhibition of the of Cc venom. Five caseinolytic units (5 μg) of Cc venom pre-incubated with different of RMAE ratios (1:0, 1:2, 1:4, 1:6, 1:8 and 1:10) for 30 min at 37 °C and the residual activity was measured using standard assay. The values represent mean ± S.D. (n = 3) and the results P < 0.01 (a) were considered as significant. (B) Zymogram analysis of protease inhibition of the Cc venom. Lane 1, 30 μg of Cc venom alone, lanes 2, 3, 4 and 5, (venom: RMAE w/w) ratios of 1:2.5, 1:5, 1:10 and 1:20 respectively.
3.3. l-amino acid oxidase (LAAO) inhibition
The RMAE abolished the LAAO activity of the Cc venom dose-dependently. The IC50 value was determined at venom: RMAE (w/w) ratio of 1:2 ratio. While, the 100% inhibition achieved at 1:10 ratio (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
l-amino acid oxidase inhibition of Cc venom. 2 μg of the Cc venom pre-incubated with different of the RMAE ratios (1:0, 1:2, 1:4, 1:6, 1:8, and 1:10) for 30 min at 37 °C and the residual activity was measured using standard assay. The values represent mean ± S.D. (n = 3) and the results P < 0.01 (a) were considered as significant.
3.4. Phospholipases (PLA2s) inhibition
The RMAE could inhibit the Cc venom PLA2s activity dose-dependently using egg yolk suspension as lecithin source. The IC50 and the 100 % inhibition values were calculated at ratios 1:2 and 1:4 (venom: RMAE w/w), respectively (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, 200 μg of Cc venom caused a clear zone diameter of 0.8 ± 0.05 cm on the prepared gel. Fig. 4B showed decreasing of halos diameters by increasing the RMAE concentration, where 85% inhibition was achieved at ratio 1:5.
Fig. 4.
(A) Phospholipases A2 inhibition of the of Cc venom. 200 μg of the Cc venom was pre-incubated with different of the RMAE ratios (1:0, 1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4) for 30 min at 37 °C and the residual activity was measured using standard assay. The values represent mean ± S.D. (n = 3) and the results P < 0.01 (a) were considered as significant. (B) Phospholipase A2 inhibition of the of Cc venom in agarose gel containing 4% washed human erythrocytes, 4% egg yolk. Halo 1, RMAE alone, hole 2, 200 μg of Cc venom alone, halos 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 (venom: RMAE w/w) ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, and 1:5, respectively.
3.5. Hemolytic inhibition
The RMAE significantly inhibited Cc venom hemolytic activity. The IC50 value of hemolytic inhibition was determined at ratio 1:10 (venom: RMAE w/w). While, the venom hemolytic activity was totally inhibited at ratio 1:30 (Fig. 5A). Further, hemolysis didn't appear when the RMAE incubated with the RBCs assay mixture alone. This proves that the RMAE is non-toxic.
Fig. 5.
(A) Hemolytic inhibition of Cc venom. 5 μg of the Cc venom was pre-incubated at different ratios of the RMAE (1:0, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20, and 1:30) for 30 min at 37 °C. (B) Pro-coagulant inhibition activity of Cc venom. 1 μg of the Cc venom was pre-incubated with different of the RMAE ratios (1:0, 1:2.5, 1:5, 1:10, and 1:20) for 30 min at 37 °C. The residual activity was measured using standard assays. The values represent mean ± S.D. (n = 3) and the results P < 0.01 (a) were considered as significant.
3.6. Inhibition of coagulant activity
The procoagulant activity of Cc venom was found to be Ca+2 dependent as coagulation initiated after calcium chloride addition. The plasma clotting time was 40 ± 1.5 s at 1 μg Cc venom concentration, while the time was prolonged to 180 ± 8 s for the control. The RMAE prolonged the clotting time of the venom from 40 ± 1.5 s to 160 ± 7.5 s at ratio 1:20 (venom: RMAE w/w) (Fig. 5 B).
3.7. Inhibition of fibrinogen degradation
When 5 μg of Cc venom was incubated with fibrinogen for 2 h, the α and ð chains of fibrinogen were completely digested, whereas β-chain was partially digested. At venom/RMAE ratios 1:10 and 1:20, the preferential inhibition of β and ð chains degradation over α chain was observed, while α, β and ð chains degradation were totally inhibited at 1:40 ratio (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.

Fibrinogenase inhibition activity of Cc venom. Lane 1, 2 mg/ml fibrinogen alone, lane 2, 5 μg of Cc venom + fibrinogen, lanes 3, 4, and 5 fibrinogen pre-incubated with (venom: RMAE w/w) ratios of 1:10, 1:20 and 1:40, respectively.
3.8. Neutralization of Cc venom lethality
The LD50 of Cc venom was established at 8 μg/20 g mouse (data not shown), the i.p. administration of the RMAE didn't induce any toxic effects even after 24 h of injection. Different doses of LD50 of venom were injected (i.p) into 8 groups of mice with or without RMAE. The mice injected with the RMAE after 10 min of venom injection showed a significant increase in the survival time compared to the mice injected with the venom alone. Furthermore, it was observed that the RMAE complete neutralized the lethality of the 1/2 and 1 LD50 doses of Cc venom. About 50% of mice still survive in a group injected with (2 LD50 of the venom + 0.5 mg of RMAE) and the survival time was 18 h compared to 27 min for a group of mice injected with 2 LD50 of the venom alone. In addition, the RMAE increased the survival time in a group of mice injected with 4LD50 of venom up to 14 h compared to 12 min for a group of mice injected with 4 LD50 of the venom alone (Table 3).
Table 3.
Neutralization of Cc venom lethality by RMAE administered intra-peritoneal. The values represent mean ± S.D. (n = 5). The results P < 0.01 (a) were considered as significant.
| Groups | Number of dead mice | Survival time (h) |
|---|---|---|
| Group1 (1/2 LD50 venom alone) | 1/5 | 23 ± 0.15 |
| Group 5 (1/2 LD50 venom + 0.5 mg/ml of RMAE) | 0/5 | ≥24 |
| Group 2 (1LD50 venom alone) | 3/5 | 20 ± 0.15 |
| Group 6 (1LD50 venom + 0.5 mg/ml of RMAE) | 0/5 | ≥24 |
| Group 3 (2LD50 venom alone) | 5/5 | 0.45 ± 0.10 |
| Group 7 (2LD50 venom + 0.5 mg/ml of RMAE) | 3/5 | 18 ± 0.91a |
| Group 4 (4LD50 venom alone) | 5/5 | 0.20 ± 0.02 |
| Group 8 (4LD50 venom + 0.5 mg/ml of RMAE) | 5/5 | 14 ± 0.10a |
| Group 9 Saline | 0/5 | ≥24 |
| Group 10 (0.5 mg/ml of RMAE) | 0/5 | ≥24 |
3.9. Neutralization of hemorrhagic activity of Cc venom
It was observed that the diameter of hemorrhagic spot in dorsal skin of mice injected with 1 μg of Cc venom was about 21 ± 1.4 mm. While, the diameters of hemorrhagic spots were reduced dose dependently with increasing the RMAE concentrations and the 100 % neutralization of hemorrhagic activity was achieved at ratio 1:40 (venom: RMAE w/w) (Fig. 7). Furthermore, the RMAE alone didn't cause any hemorrhage.
Fig. 7.
Hemorrhagic inhibition of the Cc venom. The spots were developed in the skin of mice with doses of (a) 2MHD of venom alone, (b, c, d and e) 2MHD of venom pre-incubated with different ratios of the RMAE (1:5, 1:10, 1:20 and 1:40), respectively. The values represent mean ± S.D. (n = 5). The results P < 0.01 (a) were considered as significant.
3.10. Neutralization of edema inducing by Cc venom
The RMAE showed a strong neutralization of edema inducing by Cc venom. When the Cc venom was incubated with RMAE and injected into the mice feet, a significant decrease in the edema ratio was observed. The RMAE reduced the edema from 193 ± 9.1% to 133 ± 5.5% at ratio 1:20 ratio (venom: RMAE w/w). Furthermore, at venom/RMAE ratio 1:40 the edema was reduced to 109 ± 4.7% (Fig. 8). The mice injected with RMAE alone showed an edema of 105 ± 4.9% which represents further evidence of non-toxicity of RMAE in mice models.
Fig. 8.
Inhibition of the edema activity of Cc venom. 20 μg (5 MED) of the Cc venom was pre-incubated with different ratios of the RMAE (1:0, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20 and 1:40) for 30 min at 37 °C before injected in mice. The residual activity was measured using standard assay. The values represent mean ± S.D. (n = 5) and the results P < 0.01 (a) were considered as significant.
3.11. Neutralization of myotoxicity of Cc venom
The Cc venom induced pronounced myotoxicity, which was measured by increasing in the serum CPK level (Table 4). Whereas, the CPK level was highly decreased and 84.4% of the venom myotoxic was inhibited in mice groups injected with 0.5 mg/ml RMAE after 10 min of the venom injection. Moreover, no increasing in enzymatic activity recorded when a group of mice injected individually with RMAE alone. In addition, Fig. 9 showed the light microscopic observation of non-treated and treated mice muscle tissue sections. Hemorrhage, destructions of muscle cells and inflammatory infiltration were the prominent characteristics of muscle of envenomed mice compared with control mice. The hemorrhage and inflammation decreased and the muscle fibers appeared to be normal in a group of mice treated with RMAE.
Table 4.
Serum ALT, AST and CPK levels of mice injected with Cc venom in the absence and presence of RMAE. The values represent mean ± S.D. (n = 5) and the results P < 0.01 (a) were considered as significant.
| Groups | Serum ALT | Serum AST | Serum CPK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saline (Control) | 42 ± 1.6 | 51 ± 2.04 | 57 ± 2.2 |
| Venom alone | 175 ± 5.2 | 182 ± 5.8 | 366 ± 6.1 |
| Venom + 0.5 mg/ml of RMAE | 52 ± 1.6a | 61 ± 1. 2a | 75 ± 1.5a |
| 0.5 mg/ml of RMAE | 43 ± 1.63 | 52 ± 1.7 | 62 ± 1.4 |
Fig. 9.
Effect of saline (A), lethal dose of Cc venom (B) and RMAE (C) on the site of injection of mice muscle. Photomicrographs in (A) showed normal skeletal muscle fibers, (B) showed hemorrhage (thick arrow1) and inflammation (thick arrow2) with degenerated muscle fibers and in (C) showed normal appearance of muscle fibers with less hemorrhage (thin arrow). Sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin dye (H&E X 160).
3.12. Histopathological studies
Histopathological analysis of the liver of mice injected with Cc venom in the presence and absence of the RMAE was performed (Fig. 10). The mice injected with Cc venom alone showed evident alterations in the liver. In contrast, the used of RMAE significantly reduced the venom toxicity in liver. Histological investigation of hepatic tissue sections revealed that Cc venom caused a severe liver inflammatory response, as indicated by inflammatory cellular infiltration as well as cytoplasmic vacuolation and degeneration of hepatocytes. Further, scattered dilated, congested central and portal blood vessels were observed and the hepatic sinusoids were dilated and apparently contained more Kupffer cells. Normal histological features of the liver of mice treated with RMAE. In addition, an obvious increase in AST and ALT enzymatic activities was recorded in groups of mice injected with Cc venom alone. On the other hand, an obvious decrease in AST and ALT enzymatic activities, almost close to negative control levels, was recorded in mice injected with RMAE after venom injection, Table 4.
Fig. 10.
Histological examination of mice liver. (A) a normal architecture of liver tissue with normal hepatocytes (thick arrow), central vein (CV) and thin sinusoid (thin arrow), (B) a marked dilated and congested central vein (CV), shrieked hepatocytes (arrow with 2 tail) and aggregated inflammatory cells (thick arrow) were seen in mice liver injected with Cc venom alone, (C) liver section of mice treated with RMAE showed normal central vein (CV) with few necrotic cells (thick arrow). Sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin dye (H&E X 400).
4. Discussion
Although antivenom is the only available specific treatment, it doesn't provide enough protection against venom. Further, it stimulates local tissue injury and often develops hypersensitivity reactions.33 Searching for safe and effective anti-venom compounds from natural sources is very important. Rosemary leaves extracts were investigated as therapeutic potential agents against several diseases.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
In the present study, rosemary leaves aqueous extract (RMAE) contained a considerable amount of phenolic and flavonoid contents. Difference of total phenolic and flavonoid contents of rosemary extracts were recorded in previous studies.34, 35 These differences might be due to rosemary cultivars, geographical location, and extraction conditions. Further, a considerable variation was found in phenolic acids of RMAE by using HPLC. Some of them were similar to those reported previously.35, 36, 37 Many studies reported that rosmarinic acid (RA) was the major phenolic compound in rosemary extracts. Our results recorded that the concentration of RA was much higher than that reported previously.34, 35, 38 Moreover, previous studies proved that the rosemary extracts and their constituents had antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities.34, 39, 40, 41, 42 The inhibitory potential of RMAE against Cc crude venom was evaluated by two strategies, the first one based on pre-incubation of venom with RMAE for a time prior determining the residual activities of the viper enzymes (in vitro assay) and the second involved administration of the extract after venom injection (in vivo assay).
The proteome wealth of Cc viper venom responsible for the hemostatic disorders and local tissue injury observed after viper envenomation. The Cc venom contains 70% metallo, serine and hemorragic proteinases.3, 43 These proteases caused local hemorrhage, fibrinolysis, and interfere with clotting factors and the complement system.44 The RMAE effectively inhibited the Cc venom proteases and almost the hemostatic alterations induced by Cc venom like hemorrhage, RBCs lysis, coagulation and fibrinogen degradation. The RA is an abundant phenolic component in RMAE, it has been proven to inhibit the proteinase and hemorrhagic activities of the T. flavoviridis, C. atrox, G. blomhoffii, B. arietans crude venoms.45
PLA2s represent 19 % of Cc venom and are well known for their necrotic and inflammatory actions. The PLA2s necrotic action involves the disruption of cell membrane and generates inflammatory mediators.3 The RMAE effectively inhibited the crude venom PLA2s. This inhibition may be due to the anti-inflammatory action of RMAE and its components. The RA of Rosmarinus officinalis has been shown to decrease the production of the inflammatory mediators resulting in stopping of the inflammation process.8 Also, RA of Cordia verbenacea inhibited the main PLA2 of B. jararacussu venom, which modeled into the hydrophobic channel of the enzyme active site.46
Egyptian Cc viper represents the richest source of LAAOs among all vipers inhabiting in the Egyptian environment.47 LAAOs are associated with apoptotic, cytotoxic, platelet aggregation, edema and hemorrhage due to excess production of H2O2.48 RMAE completely inhibited the Cc venom LAAOs activity. This inhibition may be due to the antioxidant action of RMAE and its components. Rosemary extract had higher antioxidant activity because it contained potential natural antioxidants such as RA, caffeic, ferulic, p-coumaric and p-hydroxybenzoic acids.39, 41, 42 Moreover, the most antioxidant activity could be seen in the extracts with more RA.40
Edema is also remarkable local effect of the Cc venom envenomation.49 The collective action of venom enzymes as (PLA2s and LAAOs) and release of histamine from the mast cells resulting in edema.50 RMAE considerably protected the mice feet from edema induced by the venom. This may be due to the ability of RMAE to inhibit the venom PLA2s and LAAOs and prevent releasing of histamine from the mast cells. Al-Sereiti et al.8 reported that the rosemary extract had a therapeutic potential in treatment bronchial asthma by inhibiting the histamine action. Also, RA of Cordia verbenacea neutralized the edema induced by B. jararacussu venom.46
The lethality of the Cc venom effectively reduced after the injection of RMAE. Since the mice injected with lethal dose of the venom were still alive even after 24 h and the survival time was highly increased in groups of mice injected with 2LD50 and 4LD50 of the Cc venom. This was supported by the histological examinations where the RMAE improved the severe damage and inflammatory response occurred in mice liver and muscle after Cc venom injection. Mors et al.6 reported that the RA inhibited the lethal action of the B. jararaca venom in mice. Wahby et al.14 proved that the RMAE, a potent hyaluronidase inhibitor, inhibited the spreading property of the Cc venom.
Clinically CPK assayed in blood tests is an enzymatic index of cellular damage. A remarkable decrease of' CPK levels of the envenomed mice serum confirmed that the RMAE could effectively inhibit the cellular damage (myonecrosis) induced by Cc venom. Ticli et al.46 evidenced the anti-myotoxic properties of RA against the basic PLA2s of B. jararacussu venom. Moreover, high levels of ALT and AST signifying the hepatotoxicity, a remarkable decrease of AST and ALT levels confirmed that the RMAE relieved the mice liver damage induced by the venom. The relief of liver toxicity is one of the therapeutic potentials of rosemary extract.8
5. Conclusion
In the present study, rosemary aqueous extract (RMAE) contained a considerable amount of phenolics, falvonoids and variation of the phenolic acids. Rosmarinic acid (RA) is the major compound of the RMAE and may be responsible for the potential neutralization action against proteases, fibrinogenases, PLAs2, LAAOs, hemolytic, hemorrhagic, edema, myotoxic activities and lethality of the Egyptian Cerastes cerastes viper venom. The RMAE is considered as a promising remedy for lethal viper bites.
Author contributions
W. H. Salama, A. M. Abdel-Aty and A. S. Fahmy had the original idea for the study and carried out the design, W. H. Salama and A. M. Abdel-Aty were responsible for data analysis and data cleaning. Drafted the manuscript was revised by all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors work in the same institute and no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of The Center for Food and Biomolecules, National Taiwan University.
Contributor Information
Walaa H. Salama, Email: walaa_hsalama@hotmail.com.
Azza M. Abdel-Aty, Email: azzasdm@hotmail.com.
Afaf S. Fahmy, Email: afafsfahmy@hotmail.com.
References
- 1.Kasturiratne A., Wickremasinghe A.R., de Silva N. The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modeling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLOS Med. 2008;5:1591–1604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Krishnan S.A., Dileepkumar R., Nair A.S., Oommen O.V. Studies on neutralizing effect of Ophiorrhiza mungos root extract against Daboia russelii venom. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;151:543–547. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fahmi L., Makran B., Pla D. Venomics and antivenomics profiles of North African Cerastes cerastes and Cerastes vipera populations reveals a potentially important therapeutic weakness. J Proteom. 2012;75:2442–2453. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rucavado A., Escalante T., Gutierrez J.M. Effect of the metalloproteinase inhibitor batimastat in the systemic toxicity induced by Bothrops asper snake venom: understanding the role of metalloproteinases in envenomation. Toxicon. 2004;43:417–424. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dey A., De J.N. Phytopharmacology of antiophidian botanicals: a review. Int J Pharmacol. 2012;8:62–79. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mors W.B., Nascimento M.C., Pereira B.M.R., Pereira N.A. Plant natural products active against snake bite—the molecular approach. Phytochemistry. 2000;55:627–642. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00229-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ashoor A. 1985. Medication with Herbs and Plants (Ebn-Sina Library for Publication and Distribution. Cairo) [Google Scholar]
- 8.Al-Sereiti M.R., Abu-Amerb K.M., Sen P. Pharmacology of rosemary (Rosmarinus oificinalis Linn.) and its therapeutic potentials. Indian J Exp Biol. 1999;37:124–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Takaki I., Bersani Amado L.E., Vendruscolo A. Antiinflammatory and antinociceptive effects of Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oil in experimental animal models. J Med Food. 2008;11:741–746. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2007.0524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bakırel T., Bakırel U., Keles O.U., Ulgen S.G., Yardibi H. In vivo assessment of antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) in alloxan-diabetic rabbits. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tai J., Cheung S., Wu M., Hasman D. Antiproliferation effect of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) on human ovarian cancer cells in vitro. Phytomedicine. 2012;19:436–443. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2011.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Doolaege E.H., Vossen E., Raes K. Effect of rosemary extract dose on lipid oxidation, colour stability and antioxidant concentrations, in reduced nitrite liver pâtés. Meat Sci. 2012;90:925–931. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Giner M.J., Vegara S., Funes L. Antimicrobial activity of food-compatible plant extracts and chitosan against naturally occurring microorganisms in tomato juice. J Sci Food Agric. 2012 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wahby A.F., Mahdy E.M.E., EL-mezayen H.A. Role of hyaluronidase inhibitors in the neutralization of toxicity of Egyptian horned viper Cerastes cerastes venom. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2012;10:213–219. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gomorie G. Preparation of buffers for use in enzyme studies. Methods Enzymol. 1955;3:357–363. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Velioglu Y.S., Mazza G., Gao L., Oomah B.D. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46:4113–4117. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhishen J., Mengcheng T., Jianming W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999;64:555–559. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim K.H., Tsao R., Yang R., Cui S.W. Phenolic acid profiles and antioxidant activities of wheat bran extracts and the effect of hydrolysis conditions. Food Chem. 2006;95(3):466–473. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lemos F.J.A., Campos F.A.P., Silva C.P.Y., Xavier-Filho J. Proteinase and amylases of larval midgut of Zabrotes subfasciatus reared on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds. Entomol Exp Appl. 1990;56:219–227. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bee A., Theakston R.D.G., Harrison R.A., Carter S.D. Novel in vitro assays for assessing the haemorrhagic activity of snake venoms and for demonstration of venom metalloproteinase inhibitors. Toxicon. 2001;39:1429–1434. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(01)00103-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kishimoto M., Takahashi T. A spectrophotometric microplate assay for L-amino acid oxidase. Anal Biochem. 2001;298:136–139. doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Marinetti G.V. The action of phospholipase A on lipoproteins. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1965;60:554–565. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(65)90152-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gutierrez J.M., Avila C., Rojas E., Cerdas L. An alternative in vitro method for testing the potency of the polyvalent antivenom produced in Costa Rica. Toxicon. 1988;26:411–413. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(88)90010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Al-Abdulla I.H., Sidki A.M., Landon J. An indirect haemolytic assay for assessing antivenoms. Toxicon. 1991;29:1043–1046. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(91)90087-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Angulo Y., Estrada R., Gutierrez J.M. Clinical and laboratory alterations in horses during immunization with snake venoms for the production of polyvalent (Crotalinae) antivenom. Toxicon. 1997;35:81–90. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(96)00077-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ouyang C., Teng C.M. Fibrinogenolytic enzymes of Trimeresurus mucrosquamatus venom. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979;420:298–308. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(76)90321-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meier J., Theakston R.D. Approximate LD50 determinations of snake venoms using eight to ten experimental animals. Toxicon. 1986;24:395–401. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(86)90199-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kondo H., Kondo S., Ikezawa H., Murata R. Studies on the quantitative method for determination of hemorrhagic activity of Habu snake venom. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1960;13:43–52. doi: 10.7883/yoken1952.13.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vishwanath B.S., Kini R.M., Gowda T.V. Characterization of three edema-inducing phospholipase A2 enzymes from habu (Trimeresurus flavoviridis) venom and their interaction with the alkaloid aristolochic acid. Toxicon. 1987;25:501–515. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(87)90286-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gutierrez J.M., Arce V., Brenes F., Chaves F. Changes in myofibrillar components after skeletal muscle necrosis induced by a myotoxin isolated from the venom of the snake Bothrops asper. Exp Mol Pathol. 1990;52:25–36. doi: 10.1016/0014-4800(90)90055-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kiernan J.A. 3rd ed. Oxford: Buttrerworth-Heinemann; London: 1999. Histological and Histochemical Methods: Theory and Practice; p. 502. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Thwin M.M., Samy R.P., Satyanarayanajois S.D., Gopalakrishnakone P. Venom neutralization by purified bioactive molecules: synthetic peptide derivatives of the endogenous PLA(2) inhibitory protein PIP (a minireview) Toxicon. 2010;56:1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Moreno S., Scheyer T., Romano C.S., Vojnov A.A. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of rosemary extracts linked to their polyphenol composition. Free Radic Res. 2006;40:223–231. doi: 10.1080/10715760500473834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.El-Beltagi H.S., Badawi M.H. Comparison of antioxidant and antimicrobial properties for Ginkgo biloba and rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) from Egypt. Not Bot Horti Agrobo. 2013;41:126–135. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cuvelier M.E., Richard H., Berset C. Antioxidative activity and phenolic composition of pilot-plant and commercial extracts of sage and rosemary. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1996;73:645–652. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zheng W., Wang S.Y. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:5165–5170. doi: 10.1021/jf010697n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dorman H.J.D., Peltoketo A., Hiltunen R., Tikkanen M.J. Characterization of the antioxidant properties of de-odorized aqueous extracts from selected Lamiaceae herbs. Food Chem. 2003;83:255–262. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Erkan N., Ayranci G., Ayranci E. Antioxidant activities of rosemary (Rosmarinus Officinalis L.) extract, blackseed (Nigella sativa L.) essential oil, carnosic acid, acid and sesamol. Food Chem. 2008;110:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mehni F., Sharififar F., Ansari M. Antioxidant activity and rosmarinic acid content of ten medicinal plants. Res Pharm Sci. 2012;7(5) [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rice-Evans C.A., Miller N.J., Paganga G. Structure – antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Fee Radic Biol Med. 1996;20:933–956. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Piazzon A., Vrhovsek U., Masuero D., Mattivi F., Mandoj F., Nardini M. Antioxidant activity of phenolic acids and their metabolites: synthesis and antioxidant properties of the sulfate derivatives of ferulic and caffeic acids and of the acyl glucuronide of ferulic acid. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:12312–12323. doi: 10.1021/jf304076z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fahmi L., Makran B., Boussadda L., Lkhider M., Ghalim N. Haemostasis disorders caused by envenomation by Cerastes cerastes and Macrovipera mauritanica vipers. Toxicon. 2015;116:43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sajevic T., Leonardi A., krizaj I. Haemostatically active proteins in snake venoms. Toxicon. 2011;57:627–645. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2011.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Aung H.T., Nikai T., Niwa M., Takaya Y. Rosmarinic acid in Argusia argentea inhibits snake venom-induced hemorrhage. J Nat Med. 2010;64:482–486. doi: 10.1007/s11418-010-0428-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ticli F.K., Hage L.I., Cambraia R.S. Rosmarinic acid, a new snake venom phospholipase A2 inhibitor from Cordia verbenacea (Boraginaceae): antiserum action potentiation and molecular interaction. Toxicon. 2005;46:318. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.El-Hakim A.E., Salama W.H., Hamed M.B., Ali A.A., Ibrahim N.M. Heterodimeric L-amino acid oxidase enzymes from Egyptian Cerastes cerastes venom: purification, biochemical characterization and partial amino acid sequencing. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2015;13:165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2015.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sunitha K., Hemshekhar M., Thushara R.M. Inflammation and oxidative stress in viper bite: an insight within and beyond. Toxicon. 2015;98:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Boumaiza S., Oussedik-Oumehdi H., Laraba-Djebari F. Pathophysiological effects of Cerastes cerastes and Vipera lebetina venoms: immunoneutralization using anti-native and anti-60Co irradiated venoms. Biologicals. 2016;44:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2015.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nascimento N.G., Sampaio M.C., Olivo R.A., Teixeira C. Contribution of mast cells to the oedema induced by Bothrops moojeni snake venom and a pharmacological assessment of the inflammatory mediators involved. Toxicon. 2010;55:343–352. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]









