Skip to main content
MethodsX logoLink to MethodsX
. 2018 Sep 29;5:1148–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.010

Adsorptive removal of noxious cadmium from aqueous solutions using poly urea-formaldehyde: A novel polymer adsorbent

Mohammad Hadi Dehghani a,b,, Samira Tajik c, Ahmad Panahi c, Mostafa Khezri c, Ahmad Zarei d, Zoha Heidarinejad e, Mahmood Yousefi a
PMCID: PMC6174274  PMID: 30302321

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Keywords: Poly urea-formaldehyde, Cadmium, Adsorption, Aqueous solutions

Abstract

Cadmium is a heavy metal toxic that enters water resources through industrial, household, agricultural waste and non-sanitary landfill of urban and industrial wastes. Pollution of water resources by cadmium increases incidence of diseases including Itai-Itai, kidney disorders, cancer, chromosome effects and kidney tubular damages in low exposures. The aim of this study is to study the efficiency of a new poly urea-formaldehyde adsorbent in the removal cadmium ions from aqueous solutions. The effect of different variables such as initial pH, contact time, initial concentration of cadmium and test of real wastewater samples were evaluated. In addition, laboratory data of cadmium adsorption by urea-formaldehyde adsorbent were matched to Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin isotherm models. The results of the study showed that maximum adsorption capacity obtained by Langmuir model was 76.3 mg/g at pH = 5.5. Laboratory adsorption data matched mostly by Freundlich isotherm model (R2 =0.999) which indicates that adsorption of cadmium ions on heterogenic surfaces of poly urea-formaldehyde happens by chemical adsorption mechanism. Generally, the results of the study showed that new poly urea-formaldehyde adsorbent can be efficiently used to remove highly concentrated cadmium ions from aqueous solutions.


Specifications Table

Subject area Environmental Chemical Engineering
  • More specific subject area

  • Adsorption

  • Protocol name

  • Application of new urea formaldehyde adsorbent in the removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions.

  • Reagents/tools

  • The Cd+2 concentration measurement was performed by an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu AA- 670 model).

  • A digital pH meter (Basic 20 Crison) was used for solution pH measurement.

  • Experimental design

  • Measuring of Cd+2 concentrations under various levels of initial Cd+2 concentration, solution pH, and contact time to obtain optimal Cd+2 removal from aqueous solution using a novel adsorbent provided from Urea Formaldehyde.

  • Trial registration

  • No applicable

  • Ethics

  • No applicable

Protocol data

  • Preparation a new highly efficient polymer urea-formaldehyde for the removal of cadmium ions from aqueous solutions.

  • Maximum adsorption capacity of cadmium was 76.3 mg/g.

  • Suitable application of urea-formaldehyde adsorbent in removing cadmium ions from wastewater is shown.

Description of protocol

Chemicals and materials

All chemical materials used in the present research were in analytical grade. Chemicals including cadmium nitrate, urea, formaldehyde, acetic acid (CH3COOH) (purity degree of 100%), nitric acid (purity degree of 65%), acetate sodium (C2H3NaO2), sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4), di-sodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were provided from Merck company, Germany. A stock solution of 500 mg/L of cadmium was prepared by dissolving a certain amount of cadmium nitrate salt in de-ionized water. Different concentrations of cadmium solution were prepared by diluting the stock solution.

Urea-formaldehyde preparation

In order to prepare urea-formaldehyde adsorbent, firstly, 6 mL of formaldehyde was poured into volumetric flask and NaOH 0.1 M was added to it drop by drop for pH of the solution reach to 8. Then, 3 gr of urea was added to the solution and it was kept in a 50 °C hot water bath to be dissolved uniformly. After that, the solution was kept at 70 °C to be completely colorless. In the next step, 2 mL of cadmium with a concentration of 500 mg/L was added to the obtained solution and then 0.5 mL acetic acid 100% was added to it. After some time, obtained solution was stiff as a polymer. Then, it was ground as a powder. Then the polymer was washed three times by 50 mL nitric acid 0.1 M, each time for half an hour and the solution pH was adjusted to 6. Then the polymer was percolated and dried to remove any moisture. Finally, prepared adsorbent was used to perform cadmium adsorption tests (Fig. 1, Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Urea Formaldehyde.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The mechanism of urea and formaldehyde reactions.

Adsorption tests

All cadmium adsorption tests on urea formaldehyde polymeric adsorbent were performed using 50 mL of cadmium solution in 100 mL Erlenmeyer at a temperature range 22–24 °C on a 300 rpm shaker. In this study, the effects of initial pH (3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, 8.5), contact time (1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90 min) and initial cadmium concentrations (5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 mg/L) parameters were studied. Before adsorption process, in order to prepare buffers with pH ranging from 3.5 to 6.5, acetate sodium (C2H3NaO2) 0.01 M and acetic acid 0.01 M (CH3COOH) were used and to prepare buffers with a pH ranging from 6.5 to 8.5, sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4) 0.01 M was used. pH of the solutions was measured by a pH-meter (model Basic 20 Crison). After adsorption tests, adsorbents were removed from solution by membrane filter and the concentration of filtered cadmium solution was measured by an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu AA-670 model) equipped with GFA-4B graphite furnace atomizer and D2 lamp for background correction. Cadmium hollow cathode lamp was applied as radiation source at 4 mA. An atomic absorption signal at 228.8 nm line was recorded on a graphic printed PR-4 with peak height and gas stop mode for quantification.

Cadmium removal in real samples

Efficiency of urea formaldehyde adsorbent for removal of cadmium from real sample (wastewater) was also studied. The sample was collected from effluent of a wastewater treatment plant located in south of Tehran in Ray. First, concentration of cadmium ion was measured in real sample which was 0.078 mg/L. Then, 2 mg/L cadmium was added to the real sample and they were put next to 1 gr adsorbent for 15 min under optimum pH conditions at 22–24 °C and the amount of cadmium adsorption was determined by atomic adsorption spectroscopy method. To improve accuracy and validity, all adsorption tests were repeated in triple.

Data analysis

In surveying efficiency of synthesized polymer on real samples equations (1) and (2) were used to calculate percentage of standard deviation and relative standard deviation, respectively:

SD=x-x¯2n-1 (1)
RSD%=SDx¯×100 (2)

X: Residual concentration after adsorption process in the solution in mg/L

X¯: Mean residual concentration after adsorption process in mg/L

SD: Standard deviation

RSD (%): Relative standard deviation

N: Number of times that test performed

In order to calculate the efficiency of cadmium removal by urea-formaldehyde equation (3) was used [[1], [2], [3]].

RE=(Ci-Ct)Ci×100 (3)

Where, RE is removal efficiency (%), Ci is initial concentration of pollutant in the solution (mg/L) and Ct is final concentration of pollutant in the solution (mg/L).

Effect of pH

Solution pH is one of the most important parameters in adsorption process, because the binding of cations to active surface groups is strongly dependent on the surface charge of particles [[4], [5], [6]]. The effect of pH on the rate of adsorption of cadmium on urea formaldehyde adsorbent is shown in Fig. 3. In this research, after testing different pHs, according to Fig. 3 highest adsorption efficiency was obtained for cadmium ion by formaldehyde adsorbent at pH = 5.5 which indicates that this adsorbent acts better in weak acidic and near to neutral pH and has higher adsorption in this condition, while at pHs lower than 5.5, adsorption rate decreases and this is because at lower pHs, there is competition between H+ ions and cadmium ions, but in pHs higher than 5.5 the rate of cadmium adsorption by studied adsorbent increases and this may be due to the formation of solution complexes [[7], [8], [9]].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The effect of pH on cadmium adsorption by urea formaldehyde.

Effect of contact time

Contact time between adsorbate and adsorbent is an important parameter in adsorption process [[10], [11], [12]]. As shown in Fig. 4, during first 5 min shaking, highest cadmium adsorption has happened by urea formaldehyde and by passing time, adsorption efficiency did not considerably change and was mostly stable until the adsorbent was saturated. This can be attributed to the availability of more vacant biding sites for cadmium adsorption during initial contact times [6].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The effect of contact time on cadmium adsorption by urea formaldehyde.

Adsorption isotherms

In order to design an adsorption process for application in field, the isotherms for an adsorbate-adsorbent system should be determined experimentally [13]. The isotherms show the chemical equilibrium for the specific conditions of temperature, pH, adsorbent dosage etc. and thus indicate the maximum achievable adsorption capacity in adsorption process. To study the isotherm of cadmium adsorption by urea formaldehyde polymer, Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin adsorption isotherm models were used in optimum conditions.

Langmuir isotherm

Langmuir isotherm is valid for single layer surface adsorption and was first performed with the aim of describing gas surface adsorption on activated carbon [14].

Assumptions of Langmuir model: 1-adsorption energy is the same and does not depend on the amount of absorbed material on the adsorbent, in other words, the adsorption capability of each site is the same as the other and the presence of absorbed material in each site has no other effect, 2-adsorption bonds are reversible and 3-absorbed material is a layer with thickness of a molecule [15,16].

The linear form of Langmuir isotherm is represented by the expression:

Ceqe=Ceqmax+1KqLmax (4)

Where, qe is the amount of contaminant per 1 gr of adsorbent, Ce is the amount of remaining contaminant after equilibrium, qmax is maximum amount of absorbed substance after equilibrium and b is Langmuir constant.

Freundlich isotherm

The most important multisite adsorption isotherm for heterogeneous surfaces is the Freundlich adsorption isotherm [17]. Freundlich isotherm indicates non ideal, reversible and multilayer adsorption with heterogeneous distribution of heat and adsorption on heterogeneous surface [18]. The non-linearized form of Freundlich isotherm model is given in the following equation:

qe=kFCe1/nf (5)

Freundlich isotherm can also be written as follows:

1nq=1nK+1n1nCf (6)

LnK is y-intercept. Slope of this line is 1n which indicates adsorption intensity and K indicates adsorption capacity.

Temkin adsorption isotherm

The Temkin isotherm is usually applied for heterogeneous surface energy systems (non-uniform distribution of sorption heat) [19]. Assumptions of Temkin model: 1- adsorption is exponential, and 2- adsorption is single layer. Temkin isotherm is presented as:

qe = BLnA + B LnCe (7)

In the above equation, B = RT/b is a constant showing heat of sorption (J/mol) obtained from the Temkin plot (qe against lnCe), A (slope) is Temkin isotherm equilibrium binding constant (L/g), b (intercept) is Temkin isotherm constant, R is universal gas constant (8.314 J/mol.k) and T is absolute temperature (Kelvin).

In this study, three isotherm models such as Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin adsorption isotherms were used. Maximum adsorption capacity was 76.3 mg/g. Freundlich, Langmuir and Temkin adsorption isotherms parameters are presented in Table 1. Considering R2 correlation coefficient, the results showed that cadmium adsorption on urea formaldehyde adsorbent best matches Freundlich isotherm model. Since Freundlich isotherm indicates multi-layer adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces, it can be concluded that cadmium adsorption by urea formaldehyde occurred in multi layers (Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7).

Table 1.

Parameters and correlation coefficients of isotherm models of cadmium adsorption on urea formaldehyde.

Isotherm Isotherm formula Parameters Values
Langmuir Ceqe=Ceqmax+1KqLmaxRL=1/1+KLC0 qmax (mg/g) 76.3
KL (lit/g) 0.005
R2 0.97
Freundlich Lnqe=lnKF+1/n LnCe KF 0.44
n 1.078
R2 0.99
Temkin qe=BLnA+BLnCeB=RT/b A 0.3116
B 4.966
R2 0.91

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Langmuir isotherm for cadmium adsorption.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Freundlich isotherm for cadmium adsorption.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Temkin isotherm for cadmium adsorption.

Study of cadmium removal in real samples

Results of tests performed on real sample are presented in Table 2. Regarding the test performed on considered adsorbent, the value of standard deviation was obtained 2.47% that indicates low errors of tests. Considering Table 2, the rate of cadmium removal on real wastewater samples by urea formaldehyde adsorbent is equal to 54.6% that indicates good function of adsorbent in absorbing cadmium from aqueous solutions.

Table 2.

Standard deviation and relative standard deviation of cadmium ion adsorption in the real samples in 3 steps.

Initial concentration of cadmium (mg/L) Added concentration of cadmium (mg/L) Total concentration of cadmium (mg/L) Cadmium concentration after adsorption (mg/L) Mean concentration (mg/L) Rate of adsorption (g) SD RSD (%) Removal percentage
0.078 2 2.078 0.924 0.946 1 0.0234 2.47 54.5
0.940
0.975

References

  • 1.Dehghani M.H., Zarei A., Mesdaghinia A., Nabizadeh R., Alimohammadi M., Afsharnia M. Response surface modeling, isotherm, thermodynamic and optimization study of arsenic (V) removal from aqueous solutions using modified bentonite-chitosan (MBC) Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017;34:757–767. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khosravi R., Zarei A., Heidari M., Ahmadfazeli A., Vosughi M., Fazlzadeh M. Application of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles coated onto montmorillonite in the presence of H2O2 for efficient removal of cephalexin from aqueous solutions. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2018;35:1000–1008. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saleh H.N., Dehghani M.H., Nabizadeh R., Mahvi A.H., Hossein F., Ghaderpoori M., Yousefi M., Mohammadi A. Data on the acid black 1 dye adsorbtion from aqueous solutions by low-cost adsorbent-Cerastoderma lamarcki shell collected from the northern coast of Caspian Sea. Data Brief. 2018;17:774–780. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.01.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Assadi A., Dehghani M.H., Rastkari N., Nasseri S., Mahvi A.H. Photocatalytic reduction of hexavalent chromium in aqueous solutions with zinc oxide nanoparticles and hydrogen peroxide. Environ. Prot. Eng. 2012;38:5–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dehghani M.H., Zarei A., Mesdaghinia A., Nabizadeh R., Alimohammadi M., Afsharnia M. Adsorption of Cr (VI) ions from aqueous systems using thermally sodium organo-bentonite biopolymer composite (TSOBC): response surface methodology, isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017;85:298–312. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pandey S., Tiwari S. Facile approach to synthesize chitosan based composite—characterization and cadmium (II) ion adsorption studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015;134:646–656. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heidari A., Younesi H., Mehraban Z. Removal of Ni (II), Cd (II), and Pb (II) from a ternary aqueous solution by amino functionalized mesoporous and nano mesoporous silica. Chem. Eng. J. 2009;153:70–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Agarwal S., Tyagi I., Gupta V.K., Dehghani M., Jaafari J., Balarak D., Asif M. Rapid removal of noxious nickel (II) using novel γ-alumina nanoparticles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes: kinetic and isotherm studies. J. Mol. Liq. 2016;224:618–623. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qasemi M., Zarei A., Afsharnia M., Salehi R., Allahdadi M., Farhang M. 2018. Data on Cadmium Removal From Synthetic Aqueous Solution Using Garbage Ash. Data in Brief. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pandey S. A comprehensive review on recent developments in bentonite-based materials used as adsorbents for wastewater treatment. J. Mol. Liq. 2017;241:1091–1113. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shams M., Dehghani M.H., Nabizadeh R., Mesdaghinia A., Alimohammadi M., Najafpoor A.A. Adsorption of phosphorus from aqueous solution by cubic zeolitic imidazolate framework-8: modeling, mechanical agitation versus sonication. J. Mol. Liq. 2016;224:151–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dehghani M.H., Nikfar E., Zarei A., Esfahani N.M. The effects of US/H2O2 processes on bisphenol-A toxicity in aqueous solutions using Daphnia magnad. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017;68:183–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pandey S., Ramontja J. Guar gum-grafted poly (acrylonitrile)-templated silica xerogel: nanoengineered material for lead ion removal. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2016;7:24. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Naghizadeh A., Shahabi H., Ghasemi F., Zarei A. Synthesis of walnut shell modified with titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles for efficient removal of humic acid from aqueous solutions. J. Water Health. 2016 doi: 10.2166/wh.2016.072. wh2016072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dehghani M.H., Mahvi A.H., Rastkari N., Saeedi R., Nazmara S., Iravani E. Adsorption of bisphenol A (BPA) from aqueous solutions by carbon nanotubes: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015;54:84–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Morovat M., Chamani M., Zarei A., Sadeghi A. Dietary but not in ovo feeding of Silybum marianum extract resulted in an improvement in performance, immunity and carcass characteristics and decreased the adverse effects of high temperatures in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2016;57:105–113. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2015.1121537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heidarinejad Z., Rahmanian O., Fazlzadeh M., Heidari M. Enhancement of methylene blue adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from Date Press Cake by low frequency ultrasound. J. Mol. Liq. 2018 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dehghani M., Heibati B., Asadi A., Tyagi I., Agarwal S., Gupta V. Reduction of noxious Cr (VI) ion to Cr (III) ion in aqueous solutions using H2O2 and UV/H2O2 systems. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016;33:197–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nechifor G., Pascu D.-E., Pascu M., Traistaru G.A., Albu P.C. Comparative study of Temkin and Flory Huggins isotherms for adsorption of phosphate anion on membranes. Sci. Bull. B Chem. Mater. Sci. UPB. 2015;77:63–72. [Google Scholar]

Articles from MethodsX are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES