Abstract
Background
There is increasing evidence that the effects of Huntington's disease (HD) extend beyond the central nervous system. In particular, significant cardiac dysfunction has been described in transgenic mouse models and suggested in symptomatic patients, in whom cardiac involvement could provide an independent risk for sudden cardiac death.
Methods
Standard 12‐lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained at screening from 590 early symptomatic (Stage 1 and 2) HD patients participating in a multi‐site Phase III study were analyzed.
Results
Evaluating only those ECGs in individuals not on medications or with potentially contributing medical conditions, the prevalence of bradycardia was 28.3% (marked in 5.8%), prolonged QRS 4.9%, intraventricular conduction delay 3.4%, right bundle branch block 1.3%, and QTc prolongation 3.7%.
Conclusion
Significant cardiac abnormalities, characterized primarily by conduction abnormalities, were found in a larger than expected number of patients. Abnormal intraventricular conduction may lead to increased risk for arrhythmia and may be compounded by prescription of QT‐prolonging medications.
Keywords: cardiac conduction, ECG abnormalities, Huntington
Introduction
Huntington's disease (HD) is a dominantly inherited, progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a CAG triplet repeat expansion in the huntingtin gene, translated to a pathogenic polyglutamine expansion in the ubiquitously expressed huntingtin protein. The characteristic clinical features of HD include chorea, dystonia, bradykinesia, eye movement abnormalities, cognitive decline, and behavioral disturbances such as depression, irritability, and volatility. However, there is growing evidence that HD can also include peripheral manifestations, which may be clinically relevant.1 Cardiac causes are the second most common cause of death in HD (second only to pneumonia) affecting as many as 25% of HD patients.2 Cardiac abnormalities have been described in transgenic mouse models of HD, including dysregulation of the baroreceptor reflex, decreased heart rate variability, increased sympathetic activity, and in some cases severe arrhythmias, leading to sudden cardiac death.3, 4
We conducted a retrospective study of a large, unique electrocardiogram (ECG) dataset to evaluate the baseline characteristics of a cohort of early symptomatic HD patients participating in the Creatine Safety, Tolerability, & Efficacy in Huntington's Disease study (CREST‐E), an international, multi‐site Phase III clinical trial. We sought to evaluate the prevalence of ECG abnormalities in a representative HD patient sample.
Methods
Subjects
Screening ECGs collected from a cohort of 590 subjects participating in CREST‐E were assessed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria: 18 years of age and older, genetically confirmed HD, and stage I or II (early) disease denoted by a total functional capacity (TFC) score of ≥ 7. The study was performed in compliance with guidelines on human experimentation. The protocol was approved by the Partners Human Research Committee/Institutional Review Board and monitored by an independent data and safety monitoring board approved by NINDS.
Standard 12‐lead ECG Recording
Participants underwent standard 12‐lead ECGs. Intervals assessed included heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, and corrected QT interval (QTc), calculated using the Bazett formula. Abnormal QTc defined as ≥ 450ms for men and ≥ 460ms for women.
Results
Demographics
The ECGs from 590 individuals (285 male and 305 female) with early HD were included. The mean total functional capacity was 10.1 ± 2.1; 271 individuals were in Stage 1 (TFC 11‐13) and 319 in Stage 2 (TFC 7‐10).
ECG Abnormalities
Abnormal ECGs were found in 256 (43.3%) of the study population; 231 (39.2%) were unexplained by medical risk factors or inciting drugs and 139 (23.6%) when subjects with relative bradycardia (heart rate 50‐60 beats per minute) were excluded. We present our findings based on the population without specific risk factors tailored to each ECG abnormality. Table 1 summarizes the ECG abnormalities that were not attributable to cardiac risk factors or medications. Supporting Table 1 provides rates in the general population as a general point of comparison.
Table 1.
ECG abnormality | Age ranges separated by disease stage | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All age ranges, n (%) | 20‐39 years, n (%) | 40‐59 years, n (%) | ≥60 years, n (%) | |||||||||
Total (n = 590) | Stage 1 (n = 271) | Stage 2 (n = 319) | Total (n = 105) | Stage 1 (n = 53) | Stage 2 (n = 52) | Total (n = 346) | Stage 1 (n = 151) | Stage 2 (n = 195) | Total (n = 139) | Stage 1 (n = 67) | Stage 2 (n = 72) | |
Unexplained abnormal ECGs | 231 (39.2) | 105 (38.7) | 126 (39.5) | 29 (27.6) | 11 (20.8) | 18 (34.6) | 136 (39.3) | 64 (42.4) | 72 (36.9) | 66 (47.5) | 30 (44.8) | 36 (50.0) |
Unexplained abnormal ECGs (not including bradycardia with HR ≥50) | 139 (23.6) | 61 (22.5) | 78 (24.5) | 16 (15.2) | 5 (9.4) | 11 (21.2) | 79 (22.8) | 36 (23.8) | 43 (22.1) | 44 (31.7) | 20 (29.9) | 24 (33.3) |
Brady‐arrhythmia: expressed as % of pool without individual risk factors a | (n = 502) | (n = 233) | (n = 269) | (n = 97) | (n = 48) | (n = 49) | (n = 303) | (n = 137) | (n = 166) | (n = 101) | (n = 48) | (n = 53) |
Bradycardia (HR<60) | 142 (28.3) | 68 (25.1) | 74 (29.2) | 20 (20.6) | 10 (20.8) | 10 (20.4) | 84 (27.7) | 40 (29.2) | 44 (26.5) | 38 (37.6) | 18 (37.5) | 20 (37.7) |
Marked bradycardia (HR<50) | 29 (5.8) | 16 (6.7) | 13 (4.8) | 6 (6.2) | 4 (8.3) | 2 (4.1) | 17 (5.6) | 8 (5.8) | 10 (6.0) | 6 (5.9) | 4 (8.3) | 2 (3.8) |
Ectopy: expressed as % of pool with or without individual risk factors b | (n = 553) | (n = 254) | (n = 299) | (n = 101) | (n = 51) | (n = 50) | (n = 331) | (n = 147) | (n = 184) | (n = 121) | (n = 56) | (n = 65) |
Ectopy (atrial and ventricular) | 22 (4.0) | 10 (3.9) | 12 (4.0) | 3 (3.0) | 0 (0) | 3 (6.0) | 8 (2.4) | 3 (3.1) | 5 (2.7) | 11 (9.1) | 7 (12.5) | 4 (6.2) |
PVCs | 11 (2.0) | 7 (2.8) | 4 (1.3) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.0) | 4 (1.2) | 2 (1.4) | 2 (1.1) | 6 (5.0) | 5 (8.9) | 1 (1.5) |
Bigeminy | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Conduction abnormalities | ||||||||||||
AV block: expressed as % of pool without individual risk factors c | (n = 543) | (n = 250) | (n = 293) | (n = 103) | (n = 51) | (n = 52) | (n = 327) | (n = 147) | (n = 180) | (n = 113) | (n = 52) | (n = 61) |
All AV block | 23 (4.2) | 12 (4.8) | 11 (3.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 12 (3.7) | 7 (4.8) | 5 (2.8) | 11 (9.7) | 5 (9.6) | 6 (9.8) |
1st degree AV block | 22 (4.1) | 12 (4.8) | 10 (3.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 11 (3.4) | 7 (4.8) | 4 (2.1) | 11 (9.7) | 5 (9.6) | 6 (9.8) |
Mobitz 2 Wenckebach | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Infra‐Hisian block: expressed as % of pool without individual risk factors d | (n = 555) | (n = 261) | (n = 294) | (n = 103) | (n = 53) | (n = 50) | (n = 330) | (n = 150) | (n = 180) | (n = 122) | (n = 58) | (n = 64) |
Prolonged QRS (≥110ms) | 27 (4.9) | 9 (3.4) | 18 (6.1) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.0) | 17 (5.2) | 7 (4.7) | 10 (5.6) | 9 (7.4) | 2 (3.4) | 7 (10.9) |
IVCD | 19 (3.4) | 7 (2.7) | 12 (4.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 15 (4.5) | 5 (3.3) | 10 (5.6) | 4 (3.3) | 2 (3.4) | 2 (3.1) |
RBBB | 7 (1.3) | 2 (0.8) | 5 (1.7) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.0) | 2 (0.6) | 2 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 4 (3.3) | 0 (0) | 4 (6.3) |
LBBB | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Other: Wolff‐Parkinson‐White | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.3) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
QT prolongation: expressed as % of pool without individual risk factors e | (n = 294) | (n = 160) | (n = 134) | (n = 57) | (n = 31) | (n = 26) | (n = 171) | (n = 90) | (n = 81) | (n = 66) | (n = 39) | (n = 27) |
QT prolongation | 11 (3.7) | 4 (2.5) | 7 (5.2) | 2 (3.5) | 0 (0) | 2 (7.7) | 7 (4.1) | 3 (3.3) | 4 (4.9) | 2 (3.0) | 1 (2.6) | 1 (3.7) |
Cardiac axis abnormalities and fascicular block: expressed as % of pool without individual risk factors f | (n = 541) | (n = 249) | (n = 292) | (n = 105) | (n = 52) | (n = 50) | (n = 322) | (n = 141) | (n = 181) | (n = 117) | (n = 56) | (n = 61) |
Left axis deviation | 20 (3.7) | 8 (3.2) | 12 (4.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 8 (2.5) | 3 (2.1) | 5 (2.8) | 12 (10.3) | 5 (8.9) | 7 (11.5) |
Left anterior fascicular block | 15 (2.8) | 6 (2.4) | 9 (3.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 6 (1.9) | 3 (2.1) | 3 (1.7) | 9 (7.7) | 3 (5.4) | 6 (9.8) |
Unexplained Ischemic changes (ST, T other changes): expressed as % of pool without individual risk factors g | (n = 569) | (n = 262) | (n = 307) | (n = 104) | (n = 53) | (n = 51) | (n = 341) | (n = 151) | (n = 190) | (n = 124) | (n = 58) | (n = 66) |
Total ischemic changes | 27 (4.7) | 14 (5.3) | 13 (4.2) | 3 (2.9) | 1 (1.9) | 2 (3.9) | 17 (5.0) | 9 (6.0) | 8 (4.2) | 7 (5.6) | 4 (6.9) | 3 (4.5) |
Q waves | 3 (0.5) | 2 (0.8) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.6) | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.5) |
ST changes | 10 (1.8) | 4 (1.5) | 7 (2.3) | 2 (1.9) | 0 (0) | 2 (3.9) | 6 (1.8) | 3 (2.0) | 3 (1.6) | 2 (1.6) | 1 (1.7) | 1 (1.5) |
T wave changes (T wave inversion) | 19 (3.5) | 11 (4.2) | 9 (2.9) | 3 (2.9) | 1 (1.9) | 2 (3.9) | 13 (3.8) | 8 (5.3) | 5 (2.6) | 4 (3.2) | 2 (3.4) | 2 (3.0) |
Poor R wave progression | 2 (0.4) | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (1.7) | 0 (0) |
Left ventricular hypertrophy: expressed as % of pool without individual risk factors h | 465 | 212 | 253 | 94 | 45 | 49 | 287 | 126 | 161 | 84 | 41 | 43 |
LVH | 2 (0.4) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.8) | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.0) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Abbreviations: AV, atrioventricular); CAD, coronary artery disease; HR, heart rate; IVCD, intraventricular conduction delay; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; PVCs, premature ventricular contractions; RBBB, right bundle branch block; TdP, torsades de pointes.
aBradyarrhythmias unexplained by SA nodal blocking drugs, hypothyroidism, CAD, or hypertensive heart disease (defined as LVH/CAD/CHF).
bEctopy unexplained by CAD, hyperthyroidism or stimulants.
cAV block unexplained by CAD or AV nodal blocking drugs.
dInfra‐Hisian block unexplained by QRS prolonging drugs or CAD.
eQT prolongation unexplained by QT prolonging drugs with a known or possible risk of TdP or cardiac disease.
fCardiac axis abnormalities and fascicular block unexplained by CAD, hypertensive heart disease or obstructive sleep apnea.
gIschemic changes unexplained by CAD, digoxin therapy or hypertensive heart disease.
hLeft ventricular hypertrophy unexplained by hypertension.
Heart Rate Abnormalities
Bradycardia was very common in our cohort and present in 178 (30.2%) patients. Of the 502 subjects without risk factors for bradycardia, including sino‐atrial (SA) nodal blocking drugs, hypothyroidism, coronary artery disease (CAD), or hypertensive heart disease, 142 (28.3%) had unexplained bradycardia (heart rate < 60 bpm) and 29 (5.8%) had unexplained marked bradycardia (heart rate < 50 bpm), which did not correlate with advancing age or disease severity.
Ectopy and Rhythm Abnormalities
In the 553 without known risk factors for ectopy, including CAD, hyperthyroidism, or the use of stimulants, 22 (4.0%) patients had ectopic beats, including 2.0% with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs).
Conduction Abnormalities
Conduction abnormalities were frequent: 70 (11.9%) had evidence of atrioventricular (AV) block, prolonged QRS, cardiac axis abnormalities or fascicular block, or QTc prolongation unexplained by specific disease risk factors or relevant medications.
Atrioventricular (AV) Block
Of the 543 without CAD or AV nodal blocking drugs, 23 (4.2%) had unexplained AV block. One subject had Mobitz Type I Wenckebach and the remainder had first degree AV block. Advancing age, but not HD severity, was associated with a higher incidence of altered AV conduction.
Prolonged QRS
Of the 555 without QRS prolonging drugs or CAD, 27 (4.9%) had unexplained intraventricular conduction abnormalities with QRS prolongation ≥ 110 ms, 19 (3.4%) had intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), and 7 (1.3%) had right bundle branch block (RBBB).
Cardiac Axis Abnormalities and Fascicular Block
Of the 541 without CAD, hypertensive heart disease or obstructive sleep apnea, unexplained left axis deviation (LAD) was seen in 20 (3.7%) and left anterior fascicular block (LAFB) in 15 (2.8%).
QT Prolongation
QTc‐prolongation was found in 11 (3.7%) of the 294 subjects not on medications known to prolong the QTc interval or with CAD. Supplorting Table 2 provides prescription rates of medications associated with QTc prolongation, categorized as known or possible risk for torsades de pointes (http://www.crediblemeds.org).
Ischemic Changes (ST/T Wave Abnormalities or Other Changes)
In the 569 without known CAD, hypertensive heart disease, or on digoxin therapy, possible ischemic changes were present in 27 (4.7%). T wave inversion was the most common (3.5%), followed by ST depression (1.8%), the presence of Q waves (0.5%), and poor R wave progression (0.4%).
Multiple Unexplained ECG Abnormalities
25 subjects (4.2%) had multiple unexplained ECG abnormalities, including those potentially co‐associated, such as QT prolongation and bundle branch block, AV nodal dysfunction, or ischemic changes.
DISCUSSION
Our study suggests that significant ECG abnormalities, primarily involving rate (bradycardia) and cardiac conduction (QRS prolongation, AV, and QT prolongation) appear to occur in HD, with a greater prevalence associated with advancing age and advancing disease severity, and not associated with known secondary causes. This suggests that a diagnosis of HD alone provides an independent and significant cardiac risk factor. While one of the strengths of our retrospective study is the large sample size of a rare neurodegenerative disorder, one potential limitation is that our cohort did not include healthy controls. However, the rates of ECG abnormalities appear to be significantly greater than what has been reported in the literature and suggests that these findings may have great potential clinical relevance.
The prevalence of conduction abnormalities in early HD, in the absence of known CAD or the use of mediations known to affect cardiac conduction, suggests possible compromise of the cardiac bundles and AV node, which could lower the threshold for arrhythmia or sudden cardiac death and cause and/or aggravate cardiac failure.5 In particular, the rates of QRS‐prolongation, including infra‐Hisian block (prolonged QRS 4.7% vs. 1.30%; IVCD 3.4% vs. 0.60%)6 and RBBB (1.3% vs. 0.90%),7 were higher in HD than normative population values. In the general population, IVCD can both increase cardiac mortality (RR 2.53) and all‐cause mortality (RR 2.01), with a 3‐fold increased risk of sudden arrhythmic death.6 RBBB, usually associated with structural heart disease, is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and increased all‐cause mortality.7 Bradycardia was observed in almost one‐third of our population and marked bradycardia, with heart rates in the low 40s in approximately 6% of our cohort—higher than reported values in the general population.8 Studies have reported decreased cardiovagal activity in mid‐stage disease, suggesting an imbalance between sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiac innervation.9 Significant bradycardia can also exacerbate angina, or worsen heart failure which may complicate late stages of disease.1
It is important to note that serotonin‐uptake inhibitors and neuroleptics (not uncommonly given to treat common behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in HD), as well as tetrabenazine, might also increase the risk of QT‐prolongation and predispose HD patients to torsades‐de‐pointes and potentially fatal arrhythmias.4, 10 Our study suggests that careful monitoring of use of these medications in the HD population is warranted.
Conclusions
These results provide evidence of significant electrocardiographic abnormalities in early stage HD, which could increase the risk of symptomatic cardiac disease or lower the threshold for other cardiac risks to become symptomatic. Our results provide a definitive rationale for future controlled studies of cardiac pathology in HD.
Author Roles
1. Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; 2. Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; 3. Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing the First Draft, B. Review and Critique.
C.D.S.: 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B
H.D.R.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2C, 3A, 3B
J.H.: 2C, 3B
G.S.: 2C, 3B
S.M.H.: 1A, 2C, 3A, 3B
Disclosures
Ethical Compliance Statement: The authors confirm that they have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.
Funding sources and conflicts of interest: This work was primarily supported by cooperative agreements from the National Institutes of Health/National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NIH/NCCIH) to Dr. Hersch (U01AT000613) to Hersch and to Dr. Schifitto (U01AT008197). NIH/NCCIH staff reviewed the study design, provided oversight and assistance for study conduct, served as an interface between the study and the DSMB, and critically reviewed the manuscript. Additional funding was provided by the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements and by the FDA Orphan Products Division (R01FD003359) to Dr. Hersch. Support for biomarkers was provided by NIH/NINDS grants, P01NS058793 and U01NS071789 to Dr. Hersch and R01NS042861 to Dr. Rosas. UPenn Million Dollar Bike Ride Grant Program grant MDBR‐17‐131‐NTSAD to Dr. Stephen.
Financial disclosures for previous 12 months: There are no financial relationships deemed relevant to this manuscript for any author. Drs. Rosas and Hersch have served as consultants for Wave pharmaceuticals.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the individuals who participated in this study who so generously contributed their time and energy to this project and without whom it would not have been possible and to the CREST‐E investigators and coordinators who were critical for the data collection. The authors wish to thank the members of the CREST‐E steering committee, including Amy‐Lee Bredlau, Karen Hodgeman, Susan Smith, and the other members of the University of Rochester CHET/CTCC. Sona Gevorkian and Keith Malarick for their dedication to this research program.
Relevant disclosures and conflicts of interest are listed at the end of this article.
References
- 1. Van der Burg JM, Bjorkqvist M, Brundin P. Beyond the brain: widespread pathology in Huntington's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:765–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sørensen SA, Fenger K. Causes of death in patients with Huntington's disease and in unaffected first degree relatives. J Med Genet 1992;29(12):911–914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wood NI, Sawiak SJ, Buonincontri G, et al. Direct evidence of progressive cardiac dysfunction in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington's disease. J Huntingtons Dis 2012;1:57–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Abildtrup M, Shattock M. Cardiac Dysautonomia in Huntington's Disease J Huntingtons Dis 2013;2:251–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kurl S, Makikallio TH, Rautaharju P, Kiviniemi V, Laukkanen JA. Duration of QRS complex in resting electrocardiogram is a predictor of sudden cardiac death in men. Circulation 2012;125:2588–2594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Aro AL, Anttonen O, Tikkanen JT, et al. Intraventricular conduction delay in a standard 12‐lead electrocardiogram as a predictor of mortality in the general population. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4:704–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bussink BE, Holst AG, Jespersen L, Deckers JW, Jensen GB, Prescott E. Right bundle branch block: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in the general population: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Heart J 2013;34:138–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Tresch DD, Fleg JL. Unexplained sinus bradycardia: clinical significance and long‐term prognosis in apparently healthy persons older than 40 years. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:1009–1013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sharma KR, Romano JG, Ayyar DR, Rotta FT, Facca A, Sanchez‐Ramos J. Sympathetic skin response and heart rate variability in patients with Huntington disease. Arch Neurol 1999;56:1248–1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Roden DM. Drug‐induced prolongation of the QT interval. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1013–1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.