Abstract
The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9 system, co-opted from a bacterial defense natural mechanism, is the cutting edge technology to carry out genome editing in a revolutionary fashion. It has been shown to work in many different model organisms, from human to microbes, including two diatom species, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Transforming P. tricornutum by bacterial conjugation, we have performed CRISPR/Cas9-based mutagenesis delivering the nuclease as an episome; this allowed for avoiding unwanted perturbations due to random integration in the genome and for excluding the Cas9 activity when it was no longer required, reducing the probability of obtaining off-target mutations, a major drawback of the technology. Since there are no reports on off-target occurrence at the genome level in microalgae, we performed whole-genome Illumina sequencing and found a number of different unspecific changes in both the wild type and mutant strains, while we did not observe any preferential mutation in the genomic regions in which off-targets were predicted. Our results confirm that the CRISPR/Cas9 technology can be efficiently applied to diatoms, showing that the choice of the conjugation method is advantageous for minimizing unwanted changes in the genome of P. tricornutum.
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9, Diatoms, Off-target, Bacterial conjugation, Genome editing, Loss of heterozygosity, Knock-out, Whole genome resequencing
Introduction
Diatoms are photosynthetic unicellular eukaryotes responsible for 20% of the global carbon fixation and present in marine and freshwater habitats with roughly 100,000 different species, all characterized by the presence of a silica shell and extraordinary richness of different cell shapes (Falkowski, Barber & Smetacek, 1998; Armbrust, 2009; Mann & Vanormelingen, 2013). These organisms have been attracting scientific interest for a long time for their ecological role and extraordinary biodiversity, for their complex evolutionary history and physiological properties, for the capability of adaptation to considerably diverse environments thanks to unexpected metabolic abilities, and, more recently, for their production of biotechnologically valuable products (Kroth, 2007; Kröger, 2007; Bozarth, Maier & Zauner, 2009; Archibald, 2015). Several diatom genomes have been sequenced in the last few years. Their comparison has revealed that a large amount of the genes are not shared among different species and, moreover, do not have a predictable function when comparing with existing databases. In order to unveil the molecular mechanisms that are at the basis of diatom biology, it is crucial to enrich resources and tools to study and manipulate these organisms (Armbrust et al., 2004; Bowler et al., 2008; Lommer et al., 2012; Tanaka et al., 2015; Mock et al., 2017; Basu et al., 2017). Many efforts have been made in the last decade in this direction. Nowadays, it is possible to knock-down and overexpress genes of interest (De Riso et al., 2009), or to localize the protein product thanks to a fluorescent tag (Siaut et al., 2007), and besides gene expression modulation it is also possible, in Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Nymark et al., 2016) and in Thalassiosira pseudonana (Hopes et al., 2016), to permanently modify the genome obtaining knock-out or knock-in mutants by means of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs).
CRISPRs are repetitive sequences found in bacterial and archaeal genomes interrupted by spacers captured from previously faced virus genomes and other invasive DNA. They provide adaptive immunity via CRISPR associated (Cas) proteins that act as RNA-directed endonucleases to degrade the same type of invasive DNA if it is encountered again (Lee et al., 2016). To date, three CRISPR/Cas subtypes have been classified (Kumar & Jain, 2015). Among them, the type II CRISPR/Cas system derived from Streptococcus pyogenes is the most commonly used based on its relative simplicity (Hsu, Lander & Zhang, 2014). In particular, the type II CRISPR system utilizes a single endonuclease protein Cas9 to induce DNA cleavage (Chylinski et al., 2014). This microbial defense mechanism has been co-opted to carry out mutagenesis through two components, the Cas9 nuclease and a single guide RNA (sgRNA) directing the nuclease to a specific DNA sequence, representing the target site of interest. To accomplish its function, the target site has to be located immediately upstream of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM), a very short sequence that is recognized by the nuclease. Cleavage occurs three nucleotides upstream of the PAM on both strands, mediated by the Cas9 endonuclease introducing a precise double-strand break (DSB) with blunt ends (Chen & Gao, 2014; Doudna & Charpentier, 2014; Osakabe & Osakabe, 2015). DSB can be repaired by a highly efficient but error-prone non homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway that causes mutations at the breakpoint.
In diploid organisms, targeted mutations can be monoallelic or biallelic, homozygous or heterozygous, the latter resulting from the creation of two different mutant alleles at the target (Bortesi et al., 2016).
Despite the success of the CRISPR/Cas9 and the large use of the technology, due to the high efficiency and the user-friendly protocol with low costs, many drawbacks still have to be understood and overcome. In particular, the application of the technology can imply the occurrence of unwanted off-target mutations. Off-targets prediction tools have been developed; these, however, are not always reliable and some predicted off-target sites may be ignored by the enzyme while DSBs may be introduced elsewhere (Sander & Joung, 2014; Anderson et al., 2015).
We used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to edit the Phatr3_J46193 gene in the P. tricornutum genome transforming cells by bacterial conjugation, a method recently extended to diatoms (Karas et al., 2015). Bacterial conjugation was chosen in place of the traditional biolistic method because this latter method causes random integration of the transgene in the genome and therefore has some disadvantages, such as occurrence of unwanted perturbations of gene expression due to position effects, causing unspecific phenotypes, or frequent absence of transgene expression due to fragmentation and incomplete incorporation of the transgene. Moreover, for the CRISPR/Cas9 application, bacterial conjugation offers the great advantage for allowing the exclusion of the nuclease activity from the cells once the desirable gene modification has been obtained (Slattery et al., 2018). It is indeed largely reported in literature that off-target effects can be due to the high amount of enzyme in the cell, with continuous and uncontrollable nuclease activity (Hsu et al., 2013; Spicer & Molnar, 2018).
We analyzed the mutated strains by Sanger sequencing, observing a high mutation rate at the specific locus, but to measure the value of this approach for functional studies it is critical to examine whether it is possible to generate gene-edited cells with minimal mutational load. Allowing for quantitative and sensitive detection of targeted mutations, whole genome sequencing (WGS) is the most intuitive and comprehensive method to identify mutations induced by Cas9 at the whole genome level. Our WGS data confirmed the specific mutation and indicated a certain number of unspecific changes unlikely ascribed to nuclease activity because we observe a comparable amount of changes in the wild type and mutant strains, most likely due to in-culture evolution of the cells.
Materials and Methods
Target sequence design
Putative target sequences found in the locus chr9: 533409–537647 of the P. tricornutum genome were BLASTed against the same genome with the following criteria on the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) website: RefSeq at Representative Genome Database, optimized for somewhat similar sequences, as general parameters: expect threshold 10,000, word size 7, as scoring parameters: match/mismatch 1, −3, without filters and without mask. The sequence showing the lowest identity percentage within the rest of the genome was chosen with particular attention at the 3′ end (seed region). The oligonucleotide pair chosen was sgRNAfw 5′-tcgaatactatgcttggatggcgg-3′ and sgRNArv 5′-aaacccgccatccaagcatagtat-3′ (GC% = 50).
Preparation of the constructs
The target oligonucleotides (two μg each in 50 μl, 40 ng/μl) were annealed 10′ at 100 °C, cooled at RT, then diluted 20×. PtPuc3_diaCas9_sgRNA (https://www.addgene.org/109219/) has been digested with BsaI and 50 ng of the linearized construct were ligated by T4 (2 h at RT) with four ng of insert. The ligation reaction was microdialized and two μl of it were electroporated in one shot top 10 cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The clones were verified by digestion with BsaI and HindIII (in positive clones the BsaI restriction site is lost) and sequenced with pdiaCasfw 5′-CGGTGAGCTGGAAATTGGTT-3′and pdiaCasrv 5′-CCAAGACATGCTACCCGCA-3′ to verify the presence of the target sequence. The obtained plasmid pPtPuc3_diaCas9_sgRNA containing the target sequence (cargo vector) was chemically transformed in DH10B cells containing the conjugation vector pTA-Mob (Strand et al., 2014). Aliquots of transformed DH10B containing conjugation and cargo vectors were cryopreserved and inoculated the day before the conjugation for overnight growth.
P. tricornutum conjugation with E. coli
Axenic CCMP632 strain of P. tricornutum Bohlin was obtained from the Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton. Culture were grown in f/2 medium (Guillard, 1975) at 18 °C under white fluorescent lights (70 μmol m−2 s−1.), 12 h:12 h dark–light cycle. The DH10B containing pTA-Mob and pPtPuc3_diaCas9_sgRNA were used for the conjugation of P. tricornutum performed as in Karas et al. (2015) using f/2 as diatom medium as the only modification.
Selection of resistant clones
Resistant clones were selected on ½f/2, 1% agarose, phleomycin 20 μg/ml containing plates. Colony PCR was performed as in De Riso et al. (2009) and PCR was performed on cell lysates with ShBlefw (5′-acgacgtgaccctgttcatc-3′)-ShBlerv (5′-gtcggtcagtcctgctcct-3′) and CEN6ARS4fw (5′-gaccacacacgaaaatcctg-3′)-HIS3rv (5′-gctctggaaagtgcctcatc-3′) primer pairs to ascertain the presence of the episome (pPtPuc3_diaCas9_sgRNA) in the cells.
Sanger sequence analysis of the resistant clones
Resistant clones, resulting positive to the colony PCR amplification, were amplified by PCR with the locusfw (5′-atcctgtcgaaatggcaaaa-3′)-locusrv (5′-ttgtatcgctctacggcttg-3′) primer pair to produce and sequence the 403 bp amplicon encompassing the target locus.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from P. tricornutum axenic cultures of wild type and mutant strains and cDNA retrotranscription was performed as in Russo et al. (2015). PCR was performed on cDNA with locusfw-locusrv primer pair to produce and sequence the 403 bp amplicon encompassing the target locus. PCR amplification was performed with the locusfw2 (5′-attggagaccattcgtgaag-3′)-locusrv (5′-ttgtatcgctctacggcttg-3′) primer pair to produce and sequence the 984 bp amplicon encompassing the target locus and containing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
P. tricornutum genomic DNA preparation and WGS
Genomic DNA was extracted from 400 ml wild type and mutant P. tricornutum axenic cultures in exponential growth phase by centrifugation, followed by freezing the cells in liquid nitrogen. The frozen pellet was then resuspended in two ml of lysis buffer, incubated at 37 °C for 15′ and centrifuged at 10,000×g at 4 °C for 10′. An equal volume of a mix of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added to the supernatant and centrifuged for 15′. An equal volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added to the supernatant and centrifuged in the same conditions. Two volumes of NaAc 3M pH 5.4 and ethanol 100% were added to the supernatant and precipitated at −20 °C. Following a centrifugation of 30′, five ml of ethanol 70% was added to the pellet twice to remove salts. The resulting pellet was resuspended in water and then treated with RNAse.
Genomic DNA libraries were prepared using KAPA Hyper Prep kit (PCR-free) following manufacturer’s standard protocol. Libraries have been sequenced by Illumina HiSeq 4000 as paired-end (2 × 150 bp) following manufacturer’s standard protocol. Data have been deposited in NCBI with the accession number PRJNA453101.
WGS analyses
Raw sequencing reads were processed with FastQC (v0.11.3, http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and BBDuk (version 35.82, https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools/) to perform a quality check and to remove Illumina adapters and bases with a Phred-Like score less than 30. At the end of the quality check all the reads shorter than 35 bp were removed. High-quality reads were then mapped against the P. tricornutum reference genome (Ensembl Protists accession number ASM15095v2) with BWA MEM (version 0.7.12-r1039) (Li & Durbin, 2009) with default options. The obtained SAM files were then converted to BAM with samtools (v1.2) (Li et al., 2009) and then picard-tools (v1.131, https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/index.html) was used to add read group and to remove optical duplicates. SNPs and small insertions or deletions (indels) were detected by processing the obtained BAM files with FreeBayes (v1.1.0-3-g961e5f3) (Garrison & Marth, 2012) with the following options: -m 30 -q 20 --min-coverage 5 --max-coverage 200 --genotype-qualities. The obtained VCF was filtered to keep only the variants with a quality score higher than 30 and with coverage in both the strains. Bigger structural variations were identified with the software Breakdancer (v1.4.5) (Chen et al., 2009). A manual curation was performed on the detected variants to focus only on those with a clearer difference between wild type and mutant. The heterozygosity rate across the genome was calculated as follows: the genome was divided in 50 kb windows with bedtools (Quinlan & Hall, 2010), then the windows were intersected with the Freebayes filtered VCF and the number of homozygous (1/1 or 0/0) and heterozygous (0/1) variants were calculated. Plots were generated with ggplot2 (Wickham, 2009) applying the loess smooth algorithm. The same procedure was followed to process public available Pt1 strain reads (SRX3566562).
Potential off-targets were predicted with the online Cas-OFFinder tool (http://www.rgenome.net/cas-offinder/new) (Bae, Park & Kim, 2014).
Results
Design of the target sequence
The coding sequence corresponding to the Phatr3_J46193 gene in P. tricornutum chr9: 533409–537647 locus, was scanned for the presence of NGG PAM sequences. Among the putative target sequences, the ones that occurred just upstream of the active sites of the protein were chosen. These sequences were submitted to a nucleotide BLAST analysis on the NCBI website against the P. tricornutum genome, and target sequences showing higher identity with sequences in other regions of the P. tricornutum genome were excluded. Particular attention, in the identity analysis, was paid to the 3′-end, because it has been proposed that the 8–12 PAM-proximal bases, known as the seed sequence, determine targeting specificity of the Cas9 protein (Nishimasu et al., 2014). No software for off-target prediction in diatoms were available at the beginning of this study. A target sequence with a GC content of 50% was chosen considering that it has been reported that a GC content higher than 70% may increase the probability of off-target effects (Tsai et al., 2015).
Selection of mutant clones
The transformation efficiency was 2.0 × 10−5. One month after transformation we performed colony PCR on 14 clones to verify the presence of the episome in the cells, checking for the presence of two different regions of the episome, a fragment of the bleomycin antibiotic coding sequence and a fragment of the yeast centromeric CEN6-ARSH4-HIS3 sequence that enables episome maintenance in P. tricornutum (Karas et al., 2015) (Fig. S1). All the analyzed clones were successfully transformed. On a first group of 20 clones, resistant to the antibiotic selection, we performed colony PCR and sequenced 403 bp, encompassing the target sequence, obtaining two mutant clones. These displayed overlapping traces starting at the mutation site, an indication that two different sequences are present on the two alleles. After 1 month, we analyzed 20 additional clones with the same procedure and we found 16 mutated clones showing overlapping traces in chromatograms, observing an increase in the percentage of the mutated clones. The overlapping traces obtained in sequencing resulted from the presence of a mixture of PCR products that can be due to: (i) the occurrence of a monoallelic mutation (one allele is mutated and the other one is wild type), (ii) biallelic heterozygous mutations (both the alleles are mutated in different ways) or to (iii) a phenomenon of colony mosaicism, that is, a colony consists of a combination of cells with wild type and mutant alleles due to mutations occurring after transformed cells have started dividing (Daboussi et al., 2014).
We chose two clones and subcloned the PCR products in TOPO vector, obtaining, respectively, for clone#1: wild type, del_8, del_2, ins_7; for clone#2: del_13.1, del_23, del_13.2, del_33 (Fig. S2). We decided to focus on clone#2 by manually isolating 24 cells to obtain monoclonal cultures deriving from a single cell. From these 24 clones we obtained: one wild type, two clones with a del_1 with single peaks in the sequence (Fig. 1A), while the other 21 clones showed overlapping peaks indicating the occurrence of two different deletions on the two alleles or the presence of a monoallelic deletion together with a wild type allele (data not shown). We sequenced the same amplicon from the cDNA of the #2del_1 mutant clone and found the same mutation, confirming the presence of the single nucleotide deletion and excluding any repair events at the mRNA level (Fig. 1A).
Isolation of a single clone with specific biallelic mutations
We decided to focus on the mutant clone#2 del_1 with the clear deletion of a single nucleotide. The single nucleotide deletion affected a guanine at position Chr9_535251, corresponding to position -4 immediately adjacent to the PAM sequence. This change in the transcript generated a frame-shift mutation causing the creation of a premature stop codon, and resulted in a truncated protein product lacking the active sites. The mutant strain was subcloned on plate and all of the resulting colonies displayed the same mutation, reinforcing the evidence that they derived from a single clone. Since all the sequences showed single peaks, we imagined two scenarios: the one nucleotide deletion was present on both the alleles (biallelic and homozygous mutation) or only this small mutation was visible by PCR and Sanger analysis and a deletion larger than the obtained amplicon was present (biallelic and heterozygous mutation). To distinguish between the two possibilities of a homozygous or a heterozygous mutation, we performed a PCR amplification on a larger cDNA fragment of 984 bp encompassing the locus of interest and containing SNPs. We obtained fragments of identical length from the wild type and from the mutant strain. Since SNPs were observed in the wild type sequence but not in the mutant (Fig. 1B), the presence of a large deletion on one of the alleles in the mutant could be hypothesized.
Exclusion of Cas9 activity
Once we had identified the desirable mutation in the target locus, we eliminated the selective pressure of the antibiotic in the medium and repeated the colony PCR, verifying that the episome had been lost in the cells grown for 3 or 5 months in the absence of the antibiotic, while the episome was still present in the cells grown for 5 months under antibiotic pressure (Fig. S3).
Analysis of off-target mutations in the genome by WGS
A wild type strain and a mutant strain in which the episome had been removed by relieving the selective pressure were sequenced by WGS. About 21 and 14 million of paired-end 150 nt reads were obtained from the wild type and the mutant strain, respectively. After trimming and duplicate removal, 10,237,553 and 16,194,883 of properly paired reads were mapped against the P. tricornutum genome from wild type and mutant, respectively, corresponding to a predicted coverage of 44× and 70×.
Mutant and wild type strains were compared to the reference genome and between themselves in order to identify both small variants (SNPs, indels) and larger structural variations, such as large insertions and deletions. Overall, 279,279 (81.31% SNPs) and 274,730 (81.32% SNPs) small variants were identified in mutant and wild type respect to the reference genome, respectively. Of those, 265,209 variants were identified both in the mutant and in the wild type, whereas 12,390 and 7,843 were found only in mutant and in the wild type, respectively. A total of 713 larger structural variations were identified comparing mutant and wild type with the reference genome, with a support of at least 10 reads. Those variants included 303 inter-chromosomal translocations, 294 deletions, 37 inversions and 79 intra-chromosomal translocations, with a mean variant size of 14,297 bp. When comparing wild type and mutant, we found seven variants specific for the mutant strain (one intra-chromosomal translocation and six deletions) and one deletion specific for the wild type (Table S1).
The results obtained from the variant calling successfully detected the mutant specific deletion of the G nucleotide (Chr9:535251) on one allele of the target Phatr3_J46193 locus (Figs. 2A and 2B). On the other allele in the same locus we detected a mutant-specific 3,639 nucleotides deletion (Chr9:535239–538878) (Fig. 2C) which was supported by the coverage reduction, the distance of the paired-ends and the presence of split-reads on the breaking point. This result confirmed our hypothesis of a large deletion on one of the alleles in the mutant (Fig. 1B).
By using the Cas-OFFinder tool we predicted 98 possible off-targets of Cas9, distributed on 15 chromosomes (Table S2). Interestingly none of the observed structural variations nor any specific SNP or indel were found in any of the potential off-targets in the mutant strain.
On the other hand, we found long stretches of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the mutant clone respect to the wild type but also vice versa (Figs. 3A and 3B). More specifically, LOHs were observed for chromosomes 3, 6, 15, 21, 24 and 25 in the mutant, and for chromosomes 5, 10, 19 and 22 in the wild type. LOHs were very broad in size, ranging from a minimum of 20 kb (i.e. LOH on chromosome 15) to nearly an entire chromosome (LOH on chromosome 25). Some of the observed LOH included regions predicted as putative off-targets such as those on chromosomes 3, 6 and 25 (Table 1), and might be due to a break in one of the alleles successively repaired by homology-directed repair. However, no off-targets were predicted on the other chromosomes affected by LOH. It is important to point out that when LOH was observed this was not due to a deletion on one of the two chromosomes since the number of reads in that region remained as high as in the other regions (when a deletion occurs the number of mapped reads to that region is halved), therefore all the observed LOHs might be due to gene conversion.
Table 1. Levels of heterozygosity of LOH regions containing putative Cas9 off-targets.
Chromosome | Start | End | MUT HZ | WT HZ | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region (%) | Chromosome (%) | Region (%) | Chromosome (%) | |||
3 | 1,065,985 | 1,448,384 | 0.09 | 0.83 | 1.10 | 1.10 |
6 | 455,938 | 603,852 | 0.04 | 0.95 | 1.24 | 1.12 |
25 | 119,890 | 497,000 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 1.30 | 1.31 |
Whole genome | – | – | 0.98 | – | 0.98 | – |
Notes:
The percentage of heterozygosity has been calculated as the proportion of heterozygous variant sites over the region length.
WT, wild type; MUT, mutant; HZ, heterozygosity.
In order to get more insights into the observed variation in heterozygosity, a public dataset of WGS of the Pt1 strain, hereafter named “public Pt1” (Rastogi et al., 2017) was processed with the same bioinformatics pipeline. The results in Figs. 3A and 3B highlight that the three strains show very similar profiles of heterozygosity across the genome and the only variations affect either the mutant or the wild type strains. Interestingly, the Pearson correlation of the allele frequencies of the observed variants of wild type and mutant with the public Pt1 was higher (0.78) then the correlation between wild type and mutant (0.61). Besides, the similarity of Pt1, wild type and mutant strain was evaluated by calculating Pearson Correlation and Euclidean distance scores using all the detected variants (Table 2). Both the measures highlighted that the WT strain is more similar to Pt1 than the mutant strain.
Table 2. Measures of similarity and distance among the strains.
Pearson correlation/Euclidean distance | MUT | WT | Pt1 |
---|---|---|---|
MUT | 353.31 | 318.31 | |
WT | 0.29 | 244.80 | |
Pt1 | 0.35 | 0.40 |
Note:
Pearson correlation (decimal numbers, lower triangle) and Euclidean distance (three-figure numbers, upper triangle) between MUT, WT and Pt1 strains. The scores were calculated after converting the genotype information to scalar numbers.
Discussion
The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been used for genome editing in a wide-ranging group of organisms, from microbes to human, and it has been observed that the efficiency and mutation quality depends on a number of factors including target site choice, sgRNA design, the properties of the nuclease, the quantity of nuclease and sgRNA, and the intrinsic differences in DNA repair pathways in the diverse species (Lee et al., 2016; Miyaoka et al., 2016; Bothmer et al., 2017; Xu, Duan & Chen, 2017; Shin et al., 2017; Cebrian-Serrano & Davies, 2017). Species-dependent effects include the prevalence of NHEJ compared to homology directed recombination (HDR) in higher eukaryotes and subtle differences in the mutation signatures generated in animals and plants. While CRISPR/Cas9 mainly introduces small deletions (<10 bp) and single-base insertions in plants, both types of indels tend to be larger (deletions <40 bp and insertions of 1–15 bp) and there is a greater frequency of larger deletions in animals (Bortesi et al., 2016; Kapusi et al., 2017; Shin et al., 2017). In addition, while bacteria have a preference for HDR, eukaryotic microbes showed diverse reactions when exposed to CRISPR/Cas9. For example, Cas9 expression was toxic in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii when constitutively expressed, while transient expression of the protein along with sgRNA was able to induce indels by NHEJ (Jiang et al., 2014). On the contrary, Plasmodium falciparum showed to be deficient in the NHEJ pathway but not in the HDR when a donor template was provided (Ghorbal et al., 2014).
We applied the CRISPR/Cas9 technology in P. tricornutum obtaining different indel mutations at the target site. We used genomic PCR and Sanger sequencing as screening procedure to evaluate the efficiency of the method and the quality of mutations obtained. We also observed an increment of the proportion of the mutant cells by extending the cultivation period, probably reflecting the accumulation of new mutations (Mikami, Toki & Endo, 2015, 2016).
While previous studies in diatoms reported predominantly identical biallelic mutation consisting mostly in <40 bp deletions, with the exception of one 212 bp insertion (Nymark et al., 2016; Hopes et al., 2016), we obtained biallelic heterozygous mutations on the two alleles or monoallelic mutations as indicated by the overlapping peaks in the sequences chromatograms of the isolated cells, mostly shorter than 40 bp, but we also obtained a deletion larger than 3,500 bp, that was not detectable by PCR-based methods and was revealed by WGS analysis (Fig. 2). In the selected clone with this large deletion on one allele and a single nucleotide deletion on the other, we expect absence of a functional protein since the single nucleotide mutation leads to a frame-shift and a premature stop codon, resulting in a truncated protein product lacking the active sites. In the mutant clone, we observed only a mild phenotype characterized by a moderate decrease in growth (data not shown) probably because the cell is able to activate a compensation mechanism. More accurate phenotypic analyses will be performed in future studies, while the resequencing data presented in this study allowed to explore the extent of putative off-target effects of Cas9 and of genomic changes in the mutant strain.
As widely reported in literature, the frequency of off-target mutations depends on the abundance of the Cas9/sgRNA complex so the off-target probability can be reduced by transient expression of the components rather than stable transgene integration in the genome (Tsai et al., 2015). For this reason, we coupled the CRISPR/Cas9 technology with bacterial conjugation: the transgene in the form of episome permits to exclude the nuclease activity when it is no more required, and moreover avoids the occurrence of unwanted perturbation of gene expression due to the position effect of the transgene in the genome. A low frequency of unwanted mutations has been reported when the sgRNA features mismatches outside the seed sequence, for example in rice (Zhang, Wen & Guo, 2014; Xu et al., 2015) and wheat (Upadhyay et al., 2013), indicating that such events could be avoided by designing more specific sgRNAs. Therefore, selecting sites predicted to have the most specific seed regions with the fewest possible off-target mismatches may be crucial to improving on-target efficiency. In contrast, the PAM distal sequence has been suggested to be less important for specificity, and mismatches in this region are more likely to be tolerated (Liu et al., 2016). The choice of a target sequences with a GC content lower than 70% also allows to decrease the likelihood of off-target effects (Tsai et al., 2015).
Off-target mutations in human cells were reported by some authors to be more common than mutations at the on-target site, raising concerns about the intrinsic fidelity of the CRISPR/Cas9 system (Fu et al., 2013; Mali et al., 2013; Pattanayak et al., 2013; Hsu, Lander & Zhang, 2014; Kim et al., 2015). Indeed, this was because many studies were conducted on cancer cell lines, which present often dysfunctional repair mechanisms. In fact, when stem cells were used, no off-targets or very few events were reported (Smith et al., 2014; Veres et al., 2014). Negligible off-target effects activity was reported in zebrafish (Hruscha et al., 2013), chicken (Oishi et al., 2016) and rabbit (Lv et al., 2016). However, it is important to stress that most studies have analyzed off-targets at predicted sites rather than by WGS and in microorganisms unspecific mutations have not been widely investigated (Bortesi et al., 2016). In a recent work, which represents the only report on this topic for diatoms, Stukenberg et al. (2018) showed that using target RNAs predicted to have a high off-target score did not result in off-target mutations at the prediction sites. Since they used a PCR-based approach and only examined two potential off-target sites in five different strains, they could not exclude the possibility that the CRISPR/Cas9 system interfered with other genomic regions.
By performing WGS, we were able to reveal a very large deletion at the target site on one of the two alleles. Interestingly, we found a substantial number of mutations and also very large gene conversion phenomena in multiple regions of the genome in the mutant but also in the wild type grown for our experiments, and in a wild type strain grown in a different laboratory (Fig. 3A). We point out that the mutant strain and the wild type strain used in our study have been collected for sequencing almost 1 year after they were separated, and during this time have accumulated differences that are therefore most likely due to an in-culture effect, which could be more pronounced than the Cas9 off-target effects themselves. It is thus difficult to establish how many of the changes observed in the mutant could be ascribed to the effect of the nuclease activity and additional dedicated analyses will be required. A larger set of samples and additional controls, that is, episomes containing Cas9 only or sgRNA only, and multiple genomic targets for Cas9, will increase the amount of information and will allow to detect possible, if any, preferential off-target sites of the Cas9 nuclease. Resequencing of additional wild type strains from different laboratories could also shed light on the extent of rearrangements in cultures maintained for long periods.
Conclusions
In our study, Cas9 delivery through bacterial conjugation allowed to minimize the time of exposure of the genome to the nuclease activity.
Through WGS, we detected genomic changes, mainly large regions showing LOH, in the mutant as well as in wild type strain. This can likely be ascribed to the effect of prolonged cultivation. The occurrence of genome changes due to cultivation has to be taken into account when comparing wild type and mutant and also when comparing data from different laboratories in which P. tricornutum cultures have been grown and evolved independently. Cryopreservation of mutants as soon as they are obtained, and of the wild type original culture, could reduce the cultivation bias in the phenotypic analyses to be performed downstream.
Our results represent the proof of concept that the technology can be safely applied to diatoms, opening new unexplored opportunities to exploit the unlimited resources of this group of organisms that are precious from both ecological and biotechnological viewpoints.
Supplemental Information
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Remo Sanges and Marianne Jaubert for critically reading the manuscript, Elvira Mauriello and the SZN Molecular Biology Unit for technical support. The pPtPuc3_diaCas9_sgRNA and the pTA-Mob plasmids were kind gifts of M. Nymark and R. Lale, respectively. Whole-genome Illumina sequencing was performed by Biodiversa s.r.l.
Funding Statement
This work has received funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation GBMF 4966 (grant DiaEdit) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 654008. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Monia Teresa Russo, Email: monia.russo@szn.it.
Maria Immacolata Ferrante, Email: mariella.ferrante@szn.it.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
R. Aiese Cigliano and W. Sanseverino are employed by Sequentia Biotech SL. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Monia Teresa Russo conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and tables, authored and reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Riccardo Aiese Cigliano analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and tables, authored and reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Walter Sanseverino analyzed the data, approved the final draft.
Maria Immacolata Ferrante conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents and or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
Data have been deposited in NCBI with the accession number PRJNA453101.
References
- Anderson et al. (2015).Anderson EM, Haupt A, Schiel JA, Chou E, Machado HB, Strezoska Ž, Lenger S, McClelland S, Birmingham A, Vermeulen A, Van Brabant Smith A. Systematic analysis of CRISPR–Cas9 mismatch tolerance reveals low levels of off-target activity. Journal of Biotechnology. 2015;211:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.06.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Archibald (2015).Archibald JM. Genomic perspectives on the birth and spread of plastids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112(33):10147–10153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421374112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armbrust (2009).Armbrust EV. The life of diatoms in the world’s oceans. Nature. 2009;459(7244):185–192. doi: 10.1038/nature08057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armbrust et al. (2004).Armbrust EV, Berges JA, Bowler C, Green BR, Martinez D, Putnam NH, Zhou S, Allen AE, Apt KE, Bechner M, Brzezinski MA, Chaal BK, Chiovitti A, Davis AK, Demarest MS, Detter JC, Glavina T, Goodstein D, Hadi MZ, Hellsten U, Hildebrand M, Jenkins BD, Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Kröger N, Lau WW, Lane TW, Larimer FW, Lippmeier JC, Lucas S, Medina M, Montsant A, Obornik M, Parker MS, Palenik B, Pazour GJ, Richardson PM, Rynearson TA, Saito MA, Schwartz DC, Thamatrakoln K, Valentin K, Vardi A, Wilkerson FP, Rokhsar DS. The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira Pseudonana: ecology, evolution, and metabolism. Science. 2004;306(5693):79–86. doi: 10.1126/science.1101156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bae, Park & Kim (2014).Bae S, Park J, Kim J-S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(10):1473–1475. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basu et al. (2017).Basu S, Patil S, Mapleson D, Russo MT, Vitale L, Fevola C, Maumus F, Casotti R, Mock T, Caccamo M, Montresor M, Sanges R, Ferrante MI. Finding a partner in the ocean: molecular and evolutionary bases of the response to sexual cues in a planktonic diatom. New Phytologist. 2017;215(1):140–156. doi: 10.1111/nph.14557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bortesi et al. (2016).Bortesi L, Zhu C, Zischewski J, Perez L, Bassié L, Nadi R, Forni G, Lade SB, Soto E, Jin X, Medina V, Villorbina G, Muñoz P, Farré G, Fischer R, Twyman RM, Capell T, Christou P, Schillberg S. Patterns of CRISPR/Cas9 activity in plants, animals and microbes. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2016;14(12):2203–2216. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bothmer et al. (2017).Bothmer A, Phadke T, Barrera LA, Margulies CM, Lee CS, Buquicchio F, Moss S, Abdulkerim HS, Selleck W, Jayaram H, Myer VE, Cotta-Ramusino C. Characterization of the interplay between DNA repair and CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA lesions at an endogenous locus. Nature Communications. 2017;8:13905. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowler et al. (2008).Bowler C, Allen AE, Badger JH, Grimwood J, Jabbari K, Kuo A, Maheswari U, Martens C, Maumus F, Otillar RP, Rayko E, Salamov A, Vandepoele K, Beszteri B, Gruber A, Heijde M, Katinka M, Mock T, Valentin K, Verret F, Berges JA, Brownlee C, Cadoret J-P, Chiovitti A, Choi CJ, Coesel S, De Martino A, Detter JC, Durkin C, Falciatore A, Fournet J, Haruta M, Huysman MJJ, Jenkins BD, Jiroutova K, Jorgensen RE, Joubert Y, Kaplan A, Kröger N, Kroth PG, La Roche J, Lindquist E, Lommer M, Martin-Jézéquel V, Lopez PJ, Lucas S, Mangogna M, McGinnis K, Medlin LK, Montsant A, Oudot-Le Secq M-P, Napoli C, Obornik M, Parker MS, Petit J-L, Porcel BM, Poulsen N, Robison M, Rychlewski L, Rynearson TA, Schmutz J, Shapiro H, Siaut M, Stanley M, Sussman MR, Taylor AR, Vardi A, Von Dassow P, Vyverman W, Willis A, Wyrwicz LS, Rokhsar DS, Weissenbach J, Armbrust EV, Green BR, Van De Peer Y, Grigoriev IV. The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes. Nature. 2008;456(7219):239–244. doi: 10.1038/nature07410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bozarth, Maier & Zauner (2009).Bozarth A, Maier U-G, Zauner S. Diatoms in biotechnology: modern tools and applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2009;82(2):195–201. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1804-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cebrian-Serrano & Davies (2017).Cebrian-Serrano A, Davies B. CRISPR-Cas orthologues and variants: optimizing the repertoire, specificity and delivery of genome engineering tools. Mammalian Genome. 2017;28(7–8):247–261. doi: 10.1007/s00335-017-9697-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen & Gao (2014).Chen K, Gao C. Targeted genome modification technologies and their applications in crop improvements. Plant Cell Reports. 2014;33(4):575–583. doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1539-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen et al. (2009).Chen K, Wallis JW, McLellan MD, Larson DE, Kalicki JM, Pohl CS, McGrath SD, Wendl MC, Zhang Q, Locke DP, Shi X, Fulton RS, Ley TJ, Wilson RK, Ding L, Mardis ER. BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nature Methods. 2009;6(9):677–681. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chylinski et al. (2014).Chylinski K, Makarova KS, Charpentier E, Koonin EV. Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42(10):6091–6105. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daboussi et al. (2014).Daboussi F, Leduc S, Maréchal A, Dubois G, Guyot V, Perez-Michaut C, Amato A, Falciatore A, Juillerat A, Beurdeley M, Voytas DF, Cavarec L, Duchateau P. Genome engineering empowers the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum for biotechnology. Nature Communications. 2014;5(1):3831. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Riso et al. (2009).De Riso V, Raniello R, Maumus F, Rogato A, Bowler C, Falciatore A. Gene silencing in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37(14):e96. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doudna & Charpentier (2014).Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346(6213):1258096. doi: 10.1126/science.1258096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falkowski, Barber & Smetacek (1998).Falkowski PG, Barber RT, Smetacek V. Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science. 1998;281(5374):200–206. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu et al. (2013).Fu Y, Foden JA, Khayter C, Maeder ML, Reyon D, Joung JK, Sander JD. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nature Biotechnology. 2013;31(9):822–826. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garrison & Marth (2012).Garrison E, Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv preprint. 2012 [q-bio.GN]1207.3907
- Ghorbal et al. (2014).Ghorbal M, Gorman M, Macpherson CR, Martins RM, Scherf A, Lopez-Rubio J-J. Genome editing in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nature Biotechnology. 2014;32(8):819–821. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guillard (1975).Guillard RRL. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chanley MH, editors. Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals. Boston: Springer; 1975. pp. 29–60. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hopes et al. (2016).Hopes A, Nekrasov V, Kamoun S, Mock T. Editing of the urease gene by CRISPR-Cas in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Plant Methods. 2016;12(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13007-016-0148-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hruscha et al. (2013).Hruscha A, Krawitz P, Rechenberg A, Heinrich V, Hecht J, Haass C, Schmid B. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish. Development. 2013;140(24):4982–4987. doi: 10.1242/dev.099085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, Lander & Zhang (2014).Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014;157(6):1262–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu et al. (2013).Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, Ran FA, Konermann S, Agarwala V, Li Y, Fine EJ, Wu X, Shalem O, Cradick TJ, Marraffini LA, Bao G, Zhang F. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nature Biotechnology. 2013;31(9):827–832. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang et al. (2014).Jiang W, Brueggeman AJ, Horken KM, Plucinak TM, Weeks DP. Successful transient expression of Cas9 and single guide RNA genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryotic Cell. 2014;13(11):1465–1469. doi: 10.1128/EC.00213-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kapusi et al. (2017).Kapusi E, Corcuera-Gómez M, Melnik S, Stoger E. Heritable genomic fragment deletions and small indels in the putative ENGase gene induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in barley. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:540. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karas et al. (2015).Karas BJ, Diner RE, Lefebvre SC, McQuaid J, Phillips APR, Noddings CM, Brunson JK, Valas RE, Deerinck TJ, Jablanovic J, Gillard JTF, Beeri K, Ellisman MH, Glass JI, Hutchison CA, III, Smith HO, Venter JC, Allen AE, Dupont CL, Weyman PD. Designer diatom episomes delivered by bacterial conjugation. Nature Communications. 2015;6(1):6925. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim et al. (2015).Kim D, Bae S, Park J, Kim E, Kim S, Yu HR, Hwang J, Kim J-I, Kim J-S. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nature Methods. 2015;12(3):237–243. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kröger (2007).Kröger N. Prescribing diatom morphology: toward genetic engineering of biological nanomaterials. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2007;11(6):662–669. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kroth (2007).Kroth P. Molecular biology and the biotechnological potential of diatoms. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2007;616:23–33. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-75532-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar & Jain (2015).Kumar V, Jain M. The CRISPR–Cas system for plant genome editing: advances and opportunities. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66(1):47–57. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee et al. (2016).Lee CM, Cradick TJ, Fine EJ, Bao G. Nuclease target site selection for maximizing on-target activity and minimizing off-target effects in genome editing. Molecular Therapy. 2016;24(3):475–487. doi: 10.1038/mt.2016.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li & Durbin (2009).Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2009).Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu et al. (2016).Liu X, Homma A, Sayadi J, Yang S, Ohashi J, Takumi T. Sequence features associated with the cleavage efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):19675. doi: 10.1038/srep19675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lommer et al. (2012).Lommer M, Specht M, Roy A-S, Kraemer L, Andreson R, Gutowska MA, Wolf J, Bergner SV, Schilhabel MB, Klostermeier UC, Beiko RG, Rosenstiel P, Hippler M, LaRoche J. Genome and low-iron response of an oceanic diatom adapted to chronic iron limitation. Genome Biology. 2012;13:R66. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-7-r66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lv et al. (2016).Lv Q, Yuan L, Deng J, Chen M, Wang Y, Zeng J, Li Z, Lai L. Efficient generation of myostatin gene mutated rabbit by CRISPR/Cas9. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):25029. doi: 10.1038/srep25029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mali et al. (2013).Mali P, Aach J, Stranges PB, Esvelt KM, Moosburner M, Kosuri S, Yang L, Church GM. CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nature Biotechnology. 2013;31(9):833–838. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mann & Vanormelingen (2013).Mann DG, Vanormelingen P. An inordinate fondness? The number, distributions, and origins of diatom species. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2013;60(4):414–420. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikami, Toki & Endo (2015).Mikami M, Toki S, Endo M. Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Molecular Biology. 2015;88(6):561–572. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0342-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikami, Toki & Endo (2016).Mikami M, Toki S, Endo M. Precision targeted mutagenesis via Cas9 paired nickases in rice. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2016;57(5):1058–1068. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyaoka et al. (2016).Miyaoka Y, Berman JR, Cooper SB, Mayerl SJ, Chan AH, Zhang B, Karlin-Neumann GA, Conklin BR. Systematic quantification of HDR and NHEJ reveals effects of locus, nuclease, and cell type on genome-editing. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):23549. doi: 10.1038/srep23549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mock et al. (2017).Mock T, Otillar RP, Strauss J, McMullan M, Paajanen P, Schmutz J, Salamov A, Sanges R, Toseland A, Ward BJ, Allen AE, Dupont CL, Frickenhaus S, Maumus F, Veluchamy A, Wu T, Barry KW, Falciatore A, Ferrante MI, Fortunato AE, Glöckner G, Gruber A, Hipkin R, Janech MG, Kroth PG, Leese F, Lindquist EA, Lyon BR, Martin J, Mayer C, Parker M, Quesneville H, Raymond JA, Uhlig C, Valas RE, Valentin KU, Worden AZ, Armbrust EV, Clark MD, Bowler C, Green BR, Moulton V, Van Oosterhout C, Grigoriev IV. Evolutionary genomics of the cold-adapted diatom Fragilariopsis cylindrus. Nature. 2017;541(7638):536–540. doi: 10.1038/nature20803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nishimasu et al. (2014).Nishimasu H, Ran FA, Hsu PD, Konermann S, Shehata SI, Dohmae N, Ishitani R, Zhang F, Nureki O. Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell. 2014;156(5):935–949. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nymark et al. (2016).Nymark M, Sharma AK, Sparstad T, Bones AM, Winge P. A CRISPR/Cas9 system adapted for gene editing in marine algae. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):24951. doi: 10.1038/srep24951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oishi et al. (2016).Oishi I, Yoshii K, Miyahara D, Kagami H, Tagami T. Targeted mutagenesis in chicken using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):23980. doi: 10.1038/srep23980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osakabe & Osakabe (2015).Osakabe Y, Osakabe K. Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2015;56(3):389–400. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pattanayak et al. (2013).Pattanayak V, Lin S, Guilinger JP, Ma E, Doudna JA, Liu DR. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nature Biotechnology. 2013;31(9):839–843. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quinlan & Hall (2010).Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rastogi et al. (2017).Rastogi A, Deton-Cabanillas A-F, Rocha Jimenez Vieira F, Veluchamy A, Cantrel C, Wang G, Vanormelingen P, Bowler C, Piganeau G, Tirichine L, Hu H. Continuous gene flow contributes to low global species abundance and distribution of a marine model diatom. bioRxiv preprint. 2017:176008. doi: 10.1101/176008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Russo et al. (2015).Russo MT, Annunziata R, Sanges R, Ferrante MI, Falciatore A. The upstream regulatory sequence of the light harvesting complex Lhcf2 gene of the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum enhances transcription in an orientation- and distance-independent fashion. Marine Genomics. 2015;24:69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2015.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sander & Joung (2014).Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nature Biotechnology. 2014;32(4):347–355. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin et al. (2017).Shin HY, Wang C, Lee HK, Yoo KH, Zeng X, Kuhns T, Yang CM, Mohr T, Liu C, Hennighausen L. CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome. Nature Communications. 2017;8:15464. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siaut et al. (2007).Siaut M, Heijde M, Mangogna M, Montsant A, Coesel S, Allen A, Manfredonia A, Falciatore A, Bowler C. Molecular toolbox for studying diatom biology in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Gene. 2007;406(1–2):23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slattery et al. (2018).Slattery SS, Diamond A, Wang H, Therrien JA, Lant JT, Jazey T, Lee K, Klassen Z, Desgagné-Penix I, Karas BJ, Edgell DR. An expanded plasmid-based genetic toolbox enables Cas9 genome editing and stable maintenance of synthetic pathways in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. ACS Synthetic Biology. 2018;7(2):328–338. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith et al. (2014).Smith C, Gore A, Yan W, Abalde-Atristain L, Li Z, He C, Wang Y, Brodsky RA, Zhang K, Cheng L, Ye Z. Whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals high specificity of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN-based genome editing in human iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(1):12–13. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spicer & Molnar (2018).Spicer A, Molnar A. Gene editing of microalgae: scientific progress and regulatory challenges in Europe. Biology. 2018;7(1):21. doi: 10.3390/biology7010021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strand et al. (2014).Strand TA, Lale R, Degnes KF, Lando M, Valla S. A new and improved host-independent plasmid system for RK2-based conjugal transfer. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(3):e90372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stukenberg et al. (2018).Stukenberg D, Zauner S, Dell’Aquila G, Maier UG. Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 for the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:740. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka et al. (2015).Tanaka T, Maeda Y, Veluchamy A, Tanaka M, Abida H, Maréchal E, Bowler C, Muto M, Sunaga Y, Tanaka M, Yoshino T, Taniguchi T, Fukuda Y, Nemoto M, Matsumoto M, Wong PS, Aburatani S, Fujibuchi W. Oil accumulation by the oleaginous diatom Fistulifera solaris as revealed by the genome and transcriptome. Plant Cell. 2015;27(1):162–176. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.135194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsai et al. (2015).Tsai SQ, Zheng Z, Nguyen NT, Liebers M, Topkar VV, Thapar V, Wyvekens N, Khayter C, Iafrate AJ, Le LP, Aryee MJ, Joung JK. GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nature Biotechnology. 2015;33(2):187–197. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Upadhyay et al. (2013).Upadhyay SK, Kumar J, Alok A, Tuli R. RNA-guided genome editing for target gene mutations in wheat. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2013;3(12):2233–2238. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.008847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Veres et al. (2014).Veres A, Gosis BS, Ding Q, Collins R, Ragavendran A, Brand H, Erdin S, Cowan CA, Talkowski ME, Musunuru K. Low incidence of off-target mutations in individual CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN targeted human stem cell clones detected by whole-genome sequencing. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(2):254. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wickham (2009).Wickham H. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Duan & Chen (2017).Xu X, Duan D, Chen S-J. CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiency correlates strongly with target-sgRNA folding stability: from physical mechanism to off-target assessment. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00180-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu et al. (2015).Xu R-F, Li H, Qin R-Y, Li J, Qiu C-H, Yang Y-C, Ma H, Li L, Wei P-C, Yang J-B. Generation of inheritable and “transgene clean” targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1):11491. doi: 10.1038/srep11491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Wen & Guo (2014).Zhang F, Wen Y, Guo X. CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing: progress, implications and challenges. Human Molecular Genetics. 2014;23(R1):R40–R46. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
Data have been deposited in NCBI with the accession number PRJNA453101.