Skip to main content
Scientific Data logoLink to Scientific Data
. 2018 Oct 8;5:180200. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.200

Embryonic transcriptome sequencing of the ocellate spot skate Okamejei kenojei

Chiharu Tanegashima 1,2, Osamu Nishimura 1,2, Fumio Motone 2,3, Kaori Tatsumi 1,2, Mitsutaka Kadota 1,2, Shigehiro Kuraku 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC6174922  PMID: 30295675

Abstract

Chondrichthyans (cartilaginous fishes) exhibit highly variable reproductive styles, categorized as viviparity and oviparity. Among these, species with oviparity provide an enormous potential of molecular experimentation with stable sample supply which does not demand the sacrifices of live mothers. Cartilaginous fishes are divided into two subclasses, chimaeras (Holocephali) and elasmobranchs (Elasmobranchii), and the latter consists of two monophyletic groups, Batoidea (rays, skates and torpedoes) and Selachimorpha (sharks). Here we report transcriptome assemblies of the ocellate spot skate Okamejei kenojei, produced by strand-specific RNA-seq of its embryonic tissues. We obtained a total of 325 million illumina short reads from libraries prepared using four different tissue domains and assembled them all together. Our assembly result confirmed the species authenticity and high continuity of contig sequences. Also, assessment of its coverage of pre-selected one-to-one orthologs supported high diversity of transcripts in the assemblies. Our products are expected to provide a basis of comparative molecular studies encompassing other chondrichthyan species with emerging genomic and transcriptomic sequence information.

Subject terms: Evolutionary developmental biology, Gene expression analysis, RNA sequencing, Embryology

Background & Summary

Oviparous (egg-laying) chondrichthyans are distributed into three different selachimorphan (shark) orders, Carcharhiniformes, Heterodontiformes, and Orectolobiformes, and one batoid (skate) order Rajiformes (summarized in1). The order Rajiformes consists of four families, Anacanthobatidae, Arhynchobatidae, Gurgesiellidae, and Rajidae. As of February 2018, molecular sequence data for rajiforms concentrate on species in Rajidae, such as the little skate Leucoraja erinacea, whose genome is being sequenced2, in the head of the list, and it is followed by Amblyraja radiata and Raja clavata. One of the genera in Rajidae is Okamejei, and among more than a dozen of species in the genus Okamejei, we focused on the ocellate spot skate Okamejei kenojei in the present study. Previously, this species was recognized as Raja porosa, Okamejei porosa, or Raja kenojei. The NCBI RefSeq entry for the whole mitochondrial genome sequence of this species Okamejei kenojei (NC_007173.1) was originally registered in GenBank under one of the former species names, Raja porosa (AY525783.1)3. The habitat of O. kenojei is the coasts of Japan, Korea, China, and Taiwan in the Northwest Pacific4. While the skate species with the most abundant sequence information, L. erinacea, inhabits a small area on the east coast of North America, O. kenojei is one of the most promising oviparous skate species available in East Asia for experimentation.

For modern life science studies, genomic and transcriptomic information serves as an indispensable fundamental resource. Especially for a species without abundant molecular sequences, even small-scale transcriptome sequencing with short-read data acquisition can provide a valuable start point, which can be achieved by simple tissue sampling and small financial investment. For efficient transcriptome sequencing data acquisition, a number of technical factors have been considered to optimize sample preparation, sequencing run design, and post-sequencing data analysis. Previously, the authors’ group proposed some of those factors5, and in the present study, we extend those factors by incorporating latest reagents for sample preparation and tools for sequence data analysis.

Methods

Animal sampling and RNA extraction

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guideline of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of RIKEN Kobe Branch (Approval ID: H16-11). An approximately 8 cm-long fertilized egg of the ocellate spot skate, O. kenojei (Fig. 1a), was purchased from a commercial marine organism supplier in Minami-ise town in Mie Prefecture, Japan, in February 2016. The embryo contained in the eggcase was 5 cm-long, corresponding morphologically to the stage 31 of typical shark embryos6,7 and was dissected into six pieces labelled as head, gill, trunk, pectoral fins, cloaca, and caudal (Fig. 1b). Total RNAs were extracted from the four parts of the embryo (head, trunk, cloaca, and caudal) using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) (Fig. 1c).

Library preparation and sequencing

Using 1 μg of each of the extracted total RNAs, four strand-specific RNA-seq libraries were prepared with KAPA Stranded mRNA-Seq Kit (Kapa Biosystems, cat. No. KK8420) according to its standard protocol unless stated otherwise below. Before the total volume PCR amplification was performed, we performed a preliminary PCR using a 1.5 μl aliquot of 10 μl DNA from the previous step, with KAPA Real-Time Library Amplification Kit (Kapa Biosystems, cat. No. KK2702). This demonstrated that the amplification of the products reached Standard 1 accompanying this kit between three and four PCR cycles, which instructed us to perform the full-volume PCR with three PCR cycles, introducing the minimal amplification (Fig. 1d). The libraries were first sequenced in-house after on-board cluster generation for 127 cycles using 3x HiSeq Rapid SBS Kit v2-HS (50 cycles) (Illumina, cat. No. FC-402-4022) and HiSeq PE Rapid Cluster Kit v2-HS (Illumina, cat. No. PE-402-4002) on a HiSeq 1500 (Illumina) operated by HiSeq Control Software v2.2.58. The output was processed with Illumina RTA v1.18.64 for basecalling and with bcl2fastq v1.8.4 for de-multiplexing. To obtain more reads, we outsourced the sequencing for three of the four above-mentioned libraries on HiSeq 4000. Quality control of the obtained fastq files for individual libraries was performed with FASTQC v0.11.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/).

Figure 1. Preparation of the ocellate spot skate RNA-seq library.

Figure 1

(a) Eggcase. (b) Embryo dissection. (c) Length distributions of the extracted total RNAs. (d) Length distributions of DNA molecules in the prepared RNA-seq libraries. The peak lengths were 261 (Ok1 Caudal), 259 (Ok2 Cloaca), 253 (Ok3 Trunk), and 263 bp (Ok4 Head).

Read trimming and assembly

The obtained sequence reads in the fastq files (Data Citation 1) were processed with the program Trim Galore! v0.3.3 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/) with the options ‘--phred33 --stringency 2 --quality 30 --length 25 --paired’. The reads after adaptor trimming were assembled with the program Trinity v2.5.18 with the options ‘--trimmomatic --min_kmer_cov 2 --SS_lib_type RF’. Among the resultant contig sequences, those matching PhiX, mitochondrial DNA, and genome and transcriptome assemblies of the species sequenced in the same HiSeq run in the BLASTN v2.2.30+9 results executed with the options ‘-perc_identity 95’ were removed. We designated the resultant sequence set as the redundant nuclear transcriptome assembly (Data Citation 2). In this assembly, protein-coding regions were predicted with the program Transdecoder v5.0.210 following its user documentation, which employed the protein-level similarity to SWISSPROT11 and PFAM12 by the programs BLASTP v2.2.30+ and Hmmer v3.1b213, respectively (Data Citation 3). The obtained amino acid sequences were processed by CD-HIT v4.714 with its default parameters to reduce redundancy in it (Data Citation 4). Annotation of the putative peptide sequences were performed with similarity searches using BLASTP v2.2.30+ towards RefSeq Protein sequences for the human (GRCh38, 113,620 sequences - as of July 12, 2018) and the Callorhinchus milii (NCBI RefSeq, 28,600 sequences - as of July 12, 2018). The whole post-sequencing procedure is outlined in Fig. 2.

Figure 2. Overview of the post-sequencing work flow.

Figure 2

Code availability

No custom computer code was employed in this study.

Data Records

The approximately 325 million raw sequence reads from four different portions of a O. kenojei embryo were released in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (Table 1 and Data Citation 1). The nuclear transcriptome assembly using all the obtained reads consisted of 1,081,614 sequences (Data Citation 2), which could include spurious intergenic transcripts and alternative splicing variants. Mapping of the reads employed in the assembly to the assembled transcript contig sequences (Data Citation 2) yielded the mapping rates of as high as 90.2 to 93.1%. The nuclear protein-coding transcriptome assembly consisted of 167,783 sequences available both in the nucleotide and amino acid sequences (Data Citation 3). Out of those putative protein-coding sequences, 88,376 (52.7%) were predicted to have complete ORFs with start and stop codons. The amino acid sequence dataset after removing the redundancy consists of 79,083 components (Data Citation 4). Transcriptome assembly was also performed for the individual libraries for caudal, cloaca, trunk, and head samples, which resulted in 498,477, 377,609, 448,394, and 342,765 contigs, respectively (Data Citation 5, 6, 7, 8). These data are available as multifasta files at FigShare. We also provide a table containing best BLASTP hits to the human and C. milii RefSeq Peptide sequences as a reference for cross-species annotation (Data Citation 9).

Table 1. Sequencing statistics.

Library ID Tissue Peak of library molecule length distribution (nt) Sequencing configuration # of raw read pairs obtained # of qualified read pairs SRA ID
All the total RNA samples exhibited the RIN of 10, and all the resultant libraries were amplified with as few as three PCR cycles.            
Ok1 Caudal 272 HiSeq 1500 paired-end 127nt 81,561,105 80,108,371 SRR6866827
      HiSeq 4000 paired-end 101nt 29,204,559 28,792,861 SRR6866830
Ok2 Cloaca 257 HiSeq 1500 paired-end 127 nt 53,239,929 52,302,602 SRR6866826
Ok3 Trunk 275 HiSeq 1500, paired-end127nt 35,956,038 34,786,361 SRR6866825
      HiSeq 4000 paired-end 101nt 28,423,526 27,887,860 SRR6866829
Ok4 Head 269 HiSeq 1500 paired-end 127nt 59,350,049 58,390,345 SRR6866824
      HiSeq 4000 paired-end 101nt 37,010,620 36,489,494 SRR6866828

Technical Validation

Contiguity of RNA-seq reads

Next, we validated the contiguity of the transcript sequences by short read assembly. For this purpose, we focused on known transcript sequences of O. kenojei available at NCBI Nucleotide (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore) that are longer than 1 Kbp and derived from the nuclear genome (with the filter ‘Okamejei kenojei[Organism] AND 1000:1000000[slen] NOT mitochondrial’, accessed on March 15, 2018). With this criterion, we have identified five sequence entries (AB371645.1, AB295474.1, AB195842.1, AB201248.1, and AB201247.1), and for each of those sequences, a transcript contig in our assembly showed no less than 98% similarity (no more than 1% gaps) (Table 2). These high similarities authentificate that the species used for this study was O. kenojei.

Table 2. Long contig sequence matches to existing database entries.

Existing NCBI Entry
Match in transcript assembly
NCBI ID Gene Length (nt) Transcript ID Length (nt) % Identity % Gap
AB371645.1 ptx-l 1,416 DN146223_c3_g1_i4 1,077 99 0
AB295474.1 ptx 1,540 DN136073_c1_g3_i2 584 98 0
AB195842.1 SkCOL1A1 4,866 DN146743_c0_g1_i26 3,558 99 0
AB201248.1 COL2A1 1,802 DN128141_c7_g2_i3 4,913 99 0
AB201247.1 COL5/11A1 6,451 DN133476_c9_g3_i7 2,630 98 1

Transcript diversity measured by one-to-one ortholog coverage

We also employed a completeness assessment on the web server gVolante15 in which the ortholog search pipeline BUSCO16 is implemented. This method evaluates the coverage of one-to-one protein-coding orthologs selected in advance. For this purpose, we used the ortholog set CVG5 introduced for more accurate assessment for vertebrate sequence sets than performed with other ortholog sets, as well as the Vertebrata ortholog set released together with BUSCO16. Although the assessment results showed a slight fluctuation depending on the type of input data (nucleotide or amino acid sequences), out of the 233 components of CVG, our resultant data were shown to always contain at least 218 full-length ortholog sequences (‘complete’) and 232 partial sequences (‘fragmented’) (Table 3). Our assessment with the BUSCO’s Vertebrata ortholog set also produced comparable scores, mostly >92% in percentages. These high scores ascertain the high coverage of protein-coding genes in our resultant transcript sequence data set.

Table 3. Sequence datasets produced in this study.

Dataset Number of sequences Number of core genes a CVG (Vertebrata BUSCO)
N50 contig length (bp) Data Records    
    Only ‘Complete’ Including ‘Fragmented’ ‘Missing’    
Transcriptome assembly - all libraries 1,081,614 218 (2407) 232 (2524) 1 (62) 992 Data Citation 2
Transcriptome assembly - caudal 498,477 226 (2423) 229 (2496) 4 (90) 1,679 Data Citation 5
Transcriptome assembly - cloaca 377,609 224 (2371) 230 (2476) 3 (110) 1,744 Data Citation 6
Transcriptome assembly -trunk 448,394 225 (2389) 232 (2489) 1 (97) 1,560 Data Citation 7
Transcriptome assembly - head 342,765 221 (2361) 228 (2454) 5 (132) 1,889 Data Citation 8
Protein-coding assembly - all libraries 167,783 218 (2401) 232 (2514) 1 (72) 1,782 Data Citation 3
Non-redundant peptides - all libraries 79,083 219 (2400) 233 (2514) 0 (72) N/A Data Citation 4

aSee the existing literature16 for the definitions of ‘complete’, ‘fragmented’ and ‘missing’ in ortholog detection by BUSCO. CVGs consists of 233 orthologs in total, while Vertebrata BUSCO has 2,586 orthologs.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Tanegashima, C. et al. Embryonic transcriptome sequencing of the ocellate spot skate Okamejei kenojei. Sci. Data. 5:180200 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.200 (2018).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

sdata2018200-isa1.zip (3.9KB, zip)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Koh Onimaru, Yuichiro Hara, and the rest of Laboratory for Phyloinformatics in RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research for technical support and discussion. This study was supported by RIKEN and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17K07426 to SKuraku.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interests.

Data Citations

  1. 2018. NCBI Sequence Read Archive. SRP136043
  2. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6233576
  3. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6233570
  4. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6233573
  5. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819602
  6. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819617
  7. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819623
  8. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819629
  9. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819647

References

  1. Lopez J. A., Ryburn J. A., Fedrigo O. & Naylor G. J. Phylogeny of sharks of the family Triakidae (Carcharhiniformes) and its implications for the evolution of carcharhiniform placental viviparity. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40, 50–60 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.02.011 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wyffels J. et al. SkateBase, an elasmobranch genome project and collection of molecular resources for chondrichthyan fishes. F1000Res 3, 191 10.12688/f1000research.4996.1 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim I. C. et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of the rayfish Raja porosa (Chondrichthyes, Rajidae). DNA Seq 16, 187–194 10.1080/10425170500087975 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ishihaha H., Wang Y., Tanaka S. & Nakaya K. Okamejei kenojei. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009 e.T161645A5471805. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2009-2.RLTS.T161645A5471805.en (2009). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hara Y. et al. Optimizing and benchmarking de novo transcriptome sequencing: from library preparation to assembly evaluation. BMC Genomics 16, 977 10.1186/s12864-015-2007-1 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ballard W. W., Mellinger J. & Lechenault H. A series of normal stages for development of Scyliorhinus canicula, the lesser spotted dogfish (Chondrichthyes, Scyliorhinidae). J Exp Zool 267, 318–336 ( (1993). [Google Scholar]
  7. Onimaru K., Motone F., Kiyatake I., Nishida K. & Kuraku S. A staging table for the embryonic development of the brownbanded bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium punctatum). Dev Dyn 247, 712–723 10.1002/dvdy.24623 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grabherr M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotech 29, 644–652 10.1038/nbt.1883 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Altschul S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402 ( (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Haas B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nature Protocols 8, 1494–1512 10.1038/nprot.2013.084 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. UniProt Consortium, T. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 46, 2699 10.1093/nar/gky092 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Finn R. D. et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D279–D285 10.1093/nar/gkv1344 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mistry J., Finn R. D., Eddy S. R., Bateman A. & Punta M. Challenges in homology search: HMMER3 and convergent evolution of coiled-coil regions. Nucleic Acids Res 41, e121 10.1093/nar/gkt263 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fu L., Niu B., Zhu Z., Wu S. & Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nishimura O., Hara Y. & Kuraku S. gVolante for standardizing completeness assessment of genome and transcriptome assemblies. Bioinformatics 33, 3635–3637 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx445 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Simao F. A., Waterhouse R. M., Ioannidis P., Kriventseva E. V. & Zdobnov E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. 2018. NCBI Sequence Read Archive. SRP136043
  2. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6233576
  3. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6233570
  4. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6233573
  5. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819602
  6. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819617
  7. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819623
  8. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819629
  9. Tanegashima C., et al. . 2018. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6819647

Supplementary Materials

sdata2018200-isa1.zip (3.9KB, zip)

Articles from Scientific Data are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES