Abstract
Mannich bases and its derivatives are regarded as supreme pharmacophores in therapeutics. The study investigates the antimycotic potential of Mannich bases, 1-((1H-benzimidazol-1-yl) methyl) urea (C1) and 1-((3-hydroxynapthalen-2-yl) methyl) thiourea (C2), against Candida albicans. Biofilm and hyphal inhibitory activities of the Mannich bases were tested by crystal violet quantification, fluorescence imaging cAMP rescue, qRT PCR, and by molecular docking analysis. The compounds inhibited the biofilms of C. albicans and restrained the filamentation abilities of the pathogen. Structure-activity relationship studies revealed that the presence of urea or thiourea moiety in the tail section is essential for interacting with adenylate cyclase (AC). The Mannich bases seemed to block Ras-cAMP-PKA pathway by inhibiting second messenger activity required for hyphal induction and biofilm formation. In conclusion, the study warrants point-of-care testing of C1/C2 and provides a starting point for deriving several structurally modified Mannich bases which might plausibly replace the prevailing antimycotic drugs in future.
Introduction
Candida albicans is the most prevalent pathogenic yeast known to cause a diverse spectrum of systemic and chronic infections in human1. In the last few decades, C. albicans infections have resulted in high mortality rate ranging from 15 to 25% of the world population2. Biofilm formation and hyphal transition are the major virulence traits in C. albicans which remain as the vital etiological factors of candidiasis3. This ability allows the pathogen to adhere to host cells, invade into intestinal epithelium and colonize to form sessile phenotypes4. Yeasts constituting biofilm populations are reported to have an unique characteristic feature of exhibiting resistance to antimicrobials and antibiotics5. Extracellular and polymeric matrix structures of biofilms give cohesive and adherent properties of the organism to a surface which render the species more resistant to antifungal agents5. Several approaches were taken into consideration to eradicate C. albicans biofilms6,7.
In recent years, several mycologists have reported the rapid emergence of drug-resistant strains in the clinical specimens8. Present treatment strategies are crippled due to inadequate antimycotic drugs and the rapid emergence of drug-resistant variants (Li et al., 2017). Alternatively, targeting Ras-cAMP pathway is an alternate and selective approach to counter the virulence of C. albicans9. The obvious role of Ras1 as a switching G-protein in C. albicans is established10. Inhibitors of Ras pathway selectively target the signals and/or enzymes required for proper functioning of cellular metabolism11. Adenylyl cyclase, Cyr1, is an enzyme which is shown to regulate several developmental and virulence factors in C. albicans12,13. These include hyphal filamentations, white-opaque phenotypic switching, and biofilm formations13. The enzyme converts ATP to cAMP and the resultant cAMP binds to and activates the catalytic subunit (Bcy1) of cAMP responsive protein kinase (PKA)14,15. PKA, in turn, phosphorylates the transcription factor, EFG1, which triggers biofilm formations and filamentations in pathogenic yeasts14,16. Lately, few studies have reported inactivation of AC by different phytocompounds17 and several studies have shown the expressional levels of Ras-cAMP related genes in C. albicans, and theorized the involvement of this signaling pathway in inducing the anti-hyphal effect.
Mannich bases are end products of a nucleophilic addition reaction termed as a Mannich reaction, and are often referred to as beta-amino ketones. These synthetic chemicals have played a vital role in the development of medicinal and pharmaceutical chemistry as well. They often act as chemical leads for the synthesis of new pharmacophores or drugs with medicinal values. Several clinically reliable Mannich bases have been reported in recent times18. Other studies have reported the antifungal, antimycobacterial, antimalarial, and/or antiviral potential of Mannich bases and their derivatives19–21. Due to the emerging antibiotic resistance in microbial species have evolved, there is a constant demand to develop innovative, effective, and affordable drugs to fight the existing antibiotic crisis. This study was conducted to test the antibiofilm and antihyphal potency of few synthetic Mannich bases on C. albicans strains. A urea/thiourea-tail containing Mannich base was found to inhibit the biofilms and hyphal elements of C. albicans. In-depth analysis was performed to identify and elucidate the mode of action of the lead compound by molecular docking, quantitative PCR, and cAMP rescue assays.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
All the experiments were approved by the Ethical Committee of PRIST University, Thanjavur, India and the methods were carried out as per the guidelines.
Mannich bases, strains and culture conditions
Mannich bases, [1-((1H-benzimidazol-1-yl) methyl) urea (C1),1-((3-hydroxynapthalen-2-yl)methyl) thiourea (C2)3-((1H-Imidazol-1-yl)methylnaphthalene-2-ol (C3), and 3-((1 H-Benimidazol-1-yl) methyl) napthalen-2-ol (C4) reported in the study were synthesized by procedures as previously described22. The structures of all the Mannich bases are presented in Fig. 1. C. albicans strains (ATCC 90028 (MTCC 3017), MTCC 183, and MTCC 227) used in the experiments were procured from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) or Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC, India). All strains of C. albicans were stored in the culture medium (yeast extract- peptone- dextrose, YPD) as frozen stock with 10% (v/v) of glycerol at −80 °C and sub-cultured twice at 37 °C before every single usage of yeast culture.
Figure 1.
Structures and antibiofilm activities of Mannich bases tested against C. albicans. The non treated controls showed dense biofilms and hyphal morphology on glass surfaces when viewed under confocal microscope after 48 h of incubation at 37 °C and subsequent staining with 0.1% acridine orange. Biofilm inhibition was observed in 1-((1H-benzimidazol-1-yl) methyl) urea (C1), and 1-((3-hydroxynapthalen-2-yl) methyl) thiourea (C2), while compounds, 3-((1H-Imidazol-1-yl)methylnaphthalene-2-ol (C3), and 3-((1 H-Benimidazol-1-yl) methyl) napthalen-2-ol (C4) did not inhibit yeast biofilms. Scale bar: 50 µm.
Minimum inhibitory concentration assay
Microdilution assays were done to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in a 96-well polystyrene plates (Tarson, India)23. C. albicans were cultured in spider medium (1% mannitol, 1% nutrient broth, 0.2% K2HPO4, pH 7.2) with 0.165 M morpholine propane sulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer in 96-well flat-bottomed microtitre plates followed by inoculation of different Mannich bases (0, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 and 256 µg/mL). After incubation at 37 °C for 48 h, MIC was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm and interpreting the lowest concentration of Mannich base that inhibits the microbial growth by at least 80% and comparing the readings with organisms grown without Mannich bases. The experiments were performed in triplicates and the background optical densities were subtracted from each well of the 96-well polystyrene plates.
In vitro Biofilm inhibition assay
Biofilm inhibition assays were performed in 96-well polystyrene plate (Tarsons, India)5. C. albicans overnight-grown culture of 1 × 106 cells/mL were prepared in spider medium and were inoculated with Mannich bases at different concentrations (0, 8, 16, 32 and 64 µg/mL). They were used as anti-biofilm agents while the wells without Mannich base served as controls. After incubation for 48 h at 37 °C, followed by removal of non-adhered cells with sterile PBS, the biofilms were quantified by staining with 0.4% crystal violet for 20 mins. The crystal violet was rinsed thrice with H2O and extracted with 95% ethanol. The absorbance was measured by Bio-Tek Synergy 4 microplate reader (Thermo Fischer, USA) at 575 nm. The experiments were performed in triplicates and results are presented as mean ± SEM. cAMP biofilm rescue assays are expressed in percentage biofilm inhibition. The percent biofilm inhibition was calculated by the below formula:
Microscopic imaging
For imaging, C. albicans strains (1 × 105 cells/mL) were cultured in spider medium grown on 96-well polystyrene surfaces (Tarsons, India) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h with or without Mannich bases. After incubation, the non-adherent cells were removed by washing with sterile PBS thrice followed by aspirating the supernatant. The sessile cells adhered firmly on the bottom of the plates and were stained with 0.4% crystal violet and/or 0.1% acridine orange. The images were visualized and captured under a fluorescent microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti 100, Japan) and documented.
XTT reduction assay
Biofilm quantification was performed by calorimetric XTT [2,3-bis (2-methoxy-4-Nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide sodium salt] reduction assay and viability was indicated in terms of the calculated metabolic activity percentage. Experimental procedures involve inoculation of C. albicans strain in spider medium for 48 h at 37 °C with shaking at 250 rpm, and proceeding to re-inoculate the cells in spider medium with or without Mannich base (0, 8, 16, 32 and 64 µg/ml) in a 96-well plate for 24 h at 37 °C. XTT reduction assay kit (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) was used to study biofilm metabolic activities and experiments were performed as described by the manufacturer. The colored supernatant was measured at 450 nm using a Bio-Tek Synergy 4 microplate reader (Thermo Fischer, USA).
Yeast-Hyphae (Y-H) inhibition assay
The yeast cell suspension was incubated in liquid spider medium with different concentrations of Mannich base (0, 8, 16, 32 and 64 µg/ml) at 37 °C with continuous shaking (250 rpm) for 24 h. Bright-field and fluorescent microscope were used to visualize the formation of true hyphae in the aliquots. The aliquots were smeared, fixed, and stained with 0.4% crystal violet (CV) or 0.1% acridine orange. Inhibition of hyphal protrusion from embedded colonies was tested by streaking the yeast cells in spider medium and by visualizing the colonies after 5 days of incubation under dark field optical imaging (Nikon Eclipse Ti 100, Japan).
Quantitative Real-Time PCR assays
Quantitative RT-PCR was performed by protocols as previously described23. Planktonic cells of C. albicans treated with C1 (32 µg/mL) and grown in spider medium at 37 °C for 24 h are diluted to the cell density of 1.0 × 106. They were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Approximately 1 µg of total RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using random primers using cDNA synthesis kit (TAKARA, USA) RT- PCR was performed in 8-tube strips using 2X USB® VeriQuest TM Fast SYBR® Green qPCR master mix (Affymetrix, Inc. USA) in a Real-Time PCR machine (Step One system, Applied Biosystems, USA), and delta-delta Ct method was used to compute gene expression. Beta-actin was used as an internal reference gene and the primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 124.
Molecular docking analysis
Molecular docking study was executed by Schrodinger version 9.3. The ligands were flexible to rotate within the binding poses, while receptor was kept rigid. A grid was generated with close proximity to active sites of adenylate cyclase and docking was performed by Glide (XP model). The grid maps representing the center of active site pocket for the ligand were calculated with Autogrid. Glide module of Schrodinger 9.3 was used for docking Mannich bases with the crystal structure of adenylate cyclase (Code IFX2) retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (10.2210/pdb1fx2/pdb) as described by Singh et al.23,25. Finally, the results generated were visualized by PyMOL viewer for analysis of minimum binding energy (Kcal/mol), Ki (Inhibition constant) value (μM), and hydrogen and hydrophobic interaction of the docked inhibitor to the modeled structure.
cAMP Rescue experiment
cAMP rescue experiment was performed by the procedure as described previously24. Overnight-grown C. albicans cells were diluted in spider medium. Di-butyryl-cAMP (db-cAMP) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) were added to the culture with a final concentration of 5 mM immediately after treatments with C1 (32 µg/mL) and incubated for a period of 5 h, following which the yeast cells were assessed for hyphal growth. The free- drug treatment cells with or without db-cAMP served as a control. After incubation, cells were visualized under the phase contrast microscope. Inhibition of hyphal protrusion from embedded colonies was tested by streaking the yeast cells in spider medium and by visualizing the colonies after 5 days of incubation under dark field optical imaging (Nikon Eclipse 100, Japan).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were conducted in triplicates, and the results were expressed as means ± SD. Student’s t test was used to determine the significance levels and was considered as statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001).
Results and Discussion
Emergence of a multi-drug-resistant variant of yeast species via vertical and horizontal gene transfers demand the need for developing a new class of antifungals superior to the antibiotics used in the current regimen. The therapeutic importance Mannich bases are well documented21. This study identifies few newly synthesized Mannich bases as an antimycotic drug against the opportunistic pathogen, C. albicans. Initially, in vitro assays to test the effect of Mannich bases on C. albicans pathogenesis were conducted. C. albicans strain (ATCC 90028/ MTCC 3017) was initially used for screening the anti-pathogenic potential of Mannich bases due to its remarkable biofilm forming ability. Among the tested chemicals, C1 and C2 were efficient in reducing the yeast biofilms at the tested dosage (100 μg/mL), while C3 and C4 were ineffective (Fig. 1). Crystal violet quantification of yeast biofilms treated with Mannich bases and the structures are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1.
Based on the findings, further experiments were conducted with C1 and C2. C. albicans biofilm formation was tested in the presence and absence of the Mannich bases (0–32 μg/mL) using microtitre plates. At lower concentrations (16 and 32 μg/mL), C1 and C2 significantly inhibited the biofilm cells of C. albicans without compromising the planktonic counterparts (Fig. 2A,B). Microscopic inspection of 48 h grown biofilms on glass surfaces stained with 0.4% crystal violet (Fig. 2C) revealed a drastic reduction in biofilm cells in treated groups. The Mannich bases were also effective in preventing yeast-hypha transitions in liquid spider medium. Microscopic images of C1 or C2 treated C. albicans showed the presence of yeast cells and no filaments when cultured in liquid spider media (Fig. 2D). The aliquots were smeared, fixed and stained with Gram’s crystal violet (0.4%) and fluorescent stain (acridine orange (0.1%)) to visualize the yeast cells and the hyphal elements. (Fig. 2D). In C1 and C2 treated groups the filaments were absent and there were more yeasts per field, while the controls revealed more filaments per field.
Figure 2.
Effect of Mannich bases on C. albicans biofilms. (A) Inhibitory effect of 1-((1H-benzimidazol-1-yl) methyl) urea (C1) on C. albicans, C1 showed dose dependent inhibition of yeast biofilms after 48 h of incubation at 37 °C, with maximum inhibition at 32 µg/mL. (B) Inhibitory effect of C2 on C. albicans, 1-((3-hydroxynapthalen-2-yl) methyl) thiourea (C2) showed dose dependent inhibition of yeast biofilms after 48 h of incubation at 37 °C, with maximum inhibition at 32 µg/mL. (C) Light microscopic images of C. albicans, biofilms stained with 0.4% crystal violet showing maximum inhibition in C1 and C2 treated groups (Scale bar: 50 µm). (D) Effect of Mannich bases on yeast-to-hyphal transition in liquid spider media, control group show more hyphal elements per field following staining with crystal violet (0.4%) stain, treatment with C1 and C2 shows more yeast cells per field (Scale bar: 100 µm).
Further, to confirm the efficacy, the compounds (32 μg/mL) were tested against several other C. albicans strains and astonishingly, C1 and C2 excelled in limiting the biofilms in the tested strains (Supplementary Fig. 2). MIC of C1 and C2 against the strain was estimated as 256 μg/mL (Fig. 3A). The compounds were also successful in disrupting the pre-formed C. albicans at 64 μg/mL, suggesting its therapeutic role (Fig. 3B). Importantly, activity of the compounds were further confirmed by XTT assay. XTT assay was performed which uses cell viability as a marker based on metabolic activity of the cells. The assay is based on the reduction of XTT (yellow coloured compound) to a bright orange color formazan derivatives by viable cells. C1 (Fig. 3C) and C2 (Fig. 3D) caused a dose-dependent decline in the metabolic activities of C. albicans biofilm cells, thus confirming the crystal violet quantification methods.
Figure 3.
Effect of Mannich bases on growth, pre-formed biofilms and metabolic activities of C. albicans. (A) Concentration dependent decline of yeast growth when treated with 1-((1H-benzimidazol-1-yl) methyl) urea (C1) and 1-((3-hydroxynapthalen-2-yl) methyl) thiourea (C2), showing MIC90 as 256 µg/mL, (B) disruption of C. albicans biofilms in presence of C1 and C2. The compounds showed significant reduction in biofilms at 64 µg/mL, (C) metabolic activity of C. albicans treated with C1 showing a concentration dependent decline in the biofilm cells with a maximum inhibition at 64 µg/mL, and (D) metabolic activity of C. albicans treated with C2 showing a concentration dependent decline in the biofilm cells with maximum inhibition at 64 µg/mL. All the cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Bar graphs represent means ± SD of n = 3 experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 vs. the control.
C. albicans colonies on solid spider medium also revealed extensive hyphal protrusion, irregular shape, and top filamentation after five days of incubation at 37 °C (Fig. 4). C1 (32 μg/mL) treated colonies were devoid of hyphal protrusions and revealed smooth surface topography as confirmed by colony morphology and dark-field microscopic imaging of colony edges (Fig. 4). C1 also was devoid of top filamentations and exhibited round morphology. C2 was also successful in limiting the hyphal protrusion from colony edges and exhibited smooth and round morphology, though revealed low levels of top filamentations. Overall, hyphal inhibition in both liquid and solid media affirm C1 and C2 as strong hyphal inhibitors.
Figure 4.
Effect of Mannich bases on yeast-to-hyphal transition on solid media. The control groups show extensive hyphal protrusion from embedded colonies and top filamentation that are absent in 1-((1H-benzimidazol-1-yl) methyl) urea (C1) treated colony and comparatively low in 1-((3-hydroxynapthalen-2-yl) methyl) thiourea (C2) treated colony. The colonies were imaged after five days of incubation at 37 °C. Yellow arrow denotes top filamentations observed in control and C2 treated colony, red arrow shows hyphal protrusion from colony edges, and blue arrow represents smooth topography. Scale bar: 10 µm.
Hyphal and biofilm formation in C. albicans requires activation of the transcriptional regulator Nrg1p, which functions as a negative regulator of Y-H morphogenetic transitions. Activation of NRG1 gene follows two major pathways namely Ras-dependent (Ras-cAMP-PKA) and Ras-independent (Ubr1-Cup9) pathway26. Ras-dependent or cAMP-PKA pathway functions by producing cAMP required for activation of protein kinases (PKA) via AC. AC is a candidate enzyme which plays a vibrant role in modulating Ras-cAMP-PKA pathway and effectively controls filamentation traits in C. albicans11. Molecular docking was performed to understand the interactions of the Mannich bases with the ATP binding pocket of AC enzyme. Glide (grid-based ligand docking energetic) module of Schrodinger 9.3 was used for docking the ligands (C1-C4, quercetin and 2′, 5′-Dideoxyadenosine 3′-triphosphate tetrasodium salt (standard)) with the crystal structure of AC23,25. Quercetin was taken as the positive control as it was previously shown to limit hyphal filamentations in C. albicans by interacting with AC25. Among the tested ligands, C1 exhibited the best negative energy Glide scores (−5.90 kcal/moL) followed by C2 (−4.62 kcal/moL) (Table 1). The compounds, mainly C1, showed better binding efficiencies when compared to the standard (−4.86 Kcal/moL), and quercetin (−4.92 Kcal/moL). Glide scores of the tested ligands are presented in Supplementary Fig. 3. The other Mannich bases (C3 and C4) showed lesser binding energy scores which might be attributed to their complex structures (Table 1).
Table 1.
Interactions of Mannich bases and standard inhibitors with adenylate cyclase.
| S.No | Mannich bases | GScore (kcal/moL) | H- Bond (s) | Key residue (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-((1H-benzimidazol-1-yl) methyl) urea (C1) | −5.90 | 2 | Asp83, Asn1017 |
| 2 | 1-((3-hydroxynapthalen-2-yl)methyl) thiourea (C2) | −4.62 | 2 | Thr979, Asn1017 |
| 3 | 3-((1H-Imidazol-1-yl)methylnaphthalene-2-ol (C3) | −2.92 | 1 | Ser1013 |
| 4 | 3-((1 H-Benimidazol-1-yl) methyl) napthalen-2-ol (C4) | −3.065 | 1 | Asn1017 |
| 5 | Quercetin | −4.92 | 2 | Leu973, Asn980 |
| 6 | 2′,5′-Dideoxyadenosine 3′-triphosphate tetrasodium salt (Standard) | −4.86 | 2 | Ser1013. Asn980 |
Interactions of C1 with ATP-binding pocket of adenylate cyclase revealed strong binding interactions with two backbone hydrogen bonds with catalytic amino acids namely, asparagine-1017 and aspartic acid-983 (Fig. 5A,B), while C2 formed H-bonds with threonine-979 and asparagine-1017 (Table 1). The interactions were further stabilized by Van der Waals force interaction forces with polar and non-polar amino acid residues within the active site. Structure-activity relationship studies of C1-AC and C2-AC complexes revealed that the presence of urea or thiourea moiety in the tail section is vital for H-bonding interactions (Fig. 1). Previously, it was shown that a potent antibacterial compound containing a urea moiety, aminobenzimidazole urea, inhibited bacterial gyrase (GyrB) and topoisomerase IV (ParE)27. Taken together, the docking results confirm the hyphal inhibition by C1 and C2 and the results were in agreement.
Figure 5.
Interaction of Mannich bases with adenylate cyclase and hyphal rescue using exogenous db-cAMP. (A) 3D representations of interactions of 1-((1H-benzimidazol-1-yl) methyl) urea (C1) with adenylate cyclase (AC), (B) 2D representation of C1- adenylate cyclase complex. (C) Percent C. albicans biofilm inhibition was calculated, which showed maximum inhibition percentage for C1 (~83%) treated cells (P < 0.001 vs. the control), while the inhibitions were ~12% (P > 0.05 vs. the control) and ~26% (P > 0.05 vs. the control) for db-cAMP (vehicle control), and C1 + db-cAMP, respectively, (D) hyphal conformations of C. albicans on liquid spider media after fixing and staining with 0.1% acridine orange. Control groups show more hyphal elements per field, treatment with C1 shows more yeast cells per field, while C1 (32 µg/mL) + db–cAMP (5 mM) shows more pseudo-hyphal elements suggesting db–cAMP mimics cAMP and triggers the Ras-cAMP pathway and (E) hyphal protrusion of C. albicans colonies embedded in solid spider medium observed on fifth day of streaking and incubation at 37 °C, treatment with C1 (32 µg/mL) shows smooth colony edges, while C1 (32 µg/mL) + db–cAMP (5 mM) shows the reoccurrence of hyphal filaments from embedded colonies. Yellow arrow denotes top filamentations observed in control and C1 + db–cAMP treated colony. Scale bar: 100 µm.
To confirm that the observed anti-biofilm and anti-hyphal effect might be due to AC inactivation, we performed cAMP rescue experiment to validate our findings17. C. albicans biofilm inhibition was tested in the presence of C1 (32 µg/mL), C1 (32 µg/mL) + db-cAMP (5 mM), and db-cAMP (5 mM) alone as vehicle, and subsequently stained with crystal violet (0.4%) and quantified at 575 nm using a microtitre plate reader. Percent biofilm inhibition was calculated which showed maximum biofilm inhibition percentage for C1 (~83%) treated cells, while the inhibitions were ~12% and ~26% for db-cAMP (vehicle control), and C1 + db-cAMP, respectively (Fig. 1C). The data confirms the role of cAMP in biofilm formation. For hyphal assay, overnight cultures of C. albicans in liquid spider medium were supplemented with dibutyryl-cAMP (db-cAMP) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) (Final concentration: 5 mM) immediately after treatment with C1 (32 µg/mL) and incubated for a period of 5 h, following which the yeast cells were assessed for hyphal growth. Reassuringly, the exogenous supply of db-cAMP to C1 treated C. albicans partially restored the hyphal phenotypes (Fig. 5D). Cell counts showed a preponderance of yeast cells in C1 treated groups (>90%), while the groups treated with C1 and db-cAMP showed decreased yeast cells (20%) and dominance of pseudohyphal elements (80%). Further, assays on solid spider medium supplemented with and without C1 (32 µg/mL), and C1 (32 µg/mL) + db-cAMP (5 mM) also revealed fewer hyphal protrusion on from colony edges in C1 + db-cAMP treated groups (Fig. 5E). Explaining this finding, we suggest that db-cAMP mimics cAMP, binds to the protein kinases (PKA), and activates EFG1, which in turn triggers biofilm and hyphal formations.
C1 exhibited the best activity against C. albicans biofilms, hyphal elements and showed remarkable interactions with AC. Hence the compound was further taken forward to understand the mechanism involved in hyphal inhibition, we performed quantitative PCR analysis of candidate genes involved in Ras- Ras-cAMP-PKA pathway (RAS1 (Ras GTPase), EFG1 (enhanced filamentation growth factor-1), CYR1 (adenylate cyclase)), and the hyphal concomitant gene, HWP1 (hyphal wall protein-1). The results revealed significant down-regulation (RAS1 by >6 fold, CYR1 by >5 fold, by EFG1 >56 fold and HWP1 by >500 fold respectively) in C1 (32 µg/mL) treated groups, thus confirming the involvement of Ras-cAMP pathway in the observed anti-hyphal effect (Fig. 6A). EFG1 is a key regulator which function downstream Ras1 and is known to control biofilm formation and hyphal morphogenesis28. Significant downregulation of downstream-activating genes (EFG1 and HWP1) suggests an upstream inhibition in the Ras-cAMP-PKA signaling pathway. Ras1 controls the expression of cyr1, and downregulation of CYR1 and RAS1 mRNA transcripts observed in our experiment (Fig. 6A). It also suggests that C1 might block Ras1 as well, although we were unable to clarify this finding.
Figure 6.
(A) mRNA transcript levels of candidate genes involved in Ras-cAMP pathway in the presence and absence of 1-((1H-benzimidazol-1-yl) methyl) urea (C1), the results show significant down-regulation of mRNA transcripts (RAS1 by >6 fold, CYR1 by >5 fold, by EFG1 >56 fold and HWP1 by >500 fold respectively) in C1 treated cells, the quantification was performed by 2−ΔΔCT using ß-actin as internal reference gene, (B) plausible mode of action of C1 suggesting its potential involvement in binding to ATP binding sites of adenylate cyclase, thus inhibiting the production of cAMP levels required for biofilm and hyphal growth. Bar graph represents means ± SD of n = 3 experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 vs. the control.
Ras-cAMP-PKA pathway is unanimous in all eukaryotes and is essential for cellular response and metabolism9,29. Ras plays a critical role in controlling several phenotypes in C. albicans which includes yeast/hyphal morphogenesis, finger and tentacle formations, cell adhesion and biofilm formation, and MTLa/an opaque cell morphology. When activated, Ras, a GTPase protein interacts with AC in the plasma membrane and initiates the conversion of ATP to cAMP. cAMP binds and activates PKAs (TPK1/TPK2) which further initiates a signaling cascade leading to cellular response, hyphal growth and biofilm formation in yeasts9. Inactivation of AC, in turn, lowers cAMP levels thus inactivating PKA and enzymes downstream Ras-cAMP-PKA pathway30. From our findings, we suggest that the Mannich bases might function as competitive inhibitors and achieve hyphal and biofilm inhibition by inactivating AC (Fig. 6B).
The use of an antibiofilm agent for antimicrobial chemotherapy is an effective measure to control the microbial disease. Several reports have established the use of synthetic compounds as a promising biofilm inhibitor31. In this present study, we tested the antibiofilm and anti-hyphal potential of two synthetic Mannich bases and this is the first report to the best of our knowledge. We also propose the mode of action of the Mannich bases and have explained the possible role of urea moiety in inducing the anti-pathogenic effect. Our pivot warrants point-of-care testing of the compounds and provides a developmental starting point for deriving several structurally modified Mannich bases which might plausibly replace the existing antimycotic drugs to treat candidiasis in near future.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Chakkaravarthi Kamalanathan for providing the Mannich bases for the study. This work was supported by PRIST University in-house funding and is thankfully acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge the management of D.G. Vaishnav College for facilities to carry out the work.
Author Contributions
S.K.R. designed the work and performed assays with the synthetic compounds, qPCR. C.K. synthesized the compounds, V.R. performed the molecular docking, S.K.M and A.R. performed the XTT assay and imaging assays, and S.K.R., A.S.S. and S.K.M. drafted the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Satish Kumar Rajasekharan and Chakkaravarthi Kamalanathan contributed equally.
Contributor Information
Satish Kumar Rajasekharan, Email: generic.sat@gmail.com.
Sucharitha Kannappan Mohanvel, Email: sucharithamohanvel@gmail.com.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-32935-9.
References
- 1.Crunkhorn S. Fungal infection: Protecting from Candida albicans. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016;15:604. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kullberg BJ, et al. Efficacy of anidulafungin in 539 patients with invasive candidiasis: a patient-level pooled analysis of six clinical trials. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017;72:2368–2377. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence. 2013;4:119–128. doi: 10.4161/viru.22913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gow NA, van de Veerdonk FL, Brown AJ, Netea MG. Candida albicans morphogenesis and host defence: discriminating invasion from colonization. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;10:112–122. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rajasekharan SK, Ramesh S, Bakkiyaraj D. Synergy of flavonoids with HDAC inhibitor: new approach to target Candida tropicalis biofilms. J. Chemother. 2015;27:246–249. doi: 10.1179/1973947814Y.0000000186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haque F, Alfatah M, Ganesan K, Bhattacharyya MS. Inhibitory effect of sophorolipid on Candida albicans biofilm formation and hyphal growth. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:23575. doi: 10.1038/srep23575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rocha FAC, et al. Tumor necrosis factor prevents Candida albicans biofilm formation. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1206. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01400-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sanglard D, et al. Mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans isolates from AIDS patients involve specific multidrug transporters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2378–2386. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hogan DA, Sundstrom P. The Ras/cAMP/PKA signaling pathway and virulence in Candida albicans. Future Microbiol. 2009;4:1263–1270. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Grahl N, et al. Mitochondrial activity and Cyr1 Are key regulators of Ras1 activation of C. albicans virulence pathways. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005133. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rocha CR, et al. Signaling through adenylyl cyclase is essential for hyphal growth and virulence in the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2001;12:3631–3643. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.11.3631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vediyappan G, Dumontet V, Pelissier F, d’Enfert C. Gymnemic acids inhibit hyphal growth and virulence in Candida albicans. PLoS One. 2013;8:e74189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hogan DA, Muhlschlegel FA. Candida albicans developmental regulation: adenylyl cyclase as a coincidence detector of parallel signals. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011;14:682–686. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Midkiff J, Borochoff-Porte N, White D, Johnson DI. Small molecule inhibitors of the Candida albicans budded-to-hyphal transition act through multiple signaling pathways. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sonneborn A, et al. Protein kinase A encoded by TPK2 regulates dimorphism of Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 2000;35:386–396. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stoldt VR, Sonneborn A, Leuker CE, Ernst JF. Efg1p, an essential regulator of morphogenesis of the human pathogen Candida albicans, is a member of a conserved class of bHLH proteins regulating morphogenetic processes in fungi. EMBO J. 1997;16:1982–1991. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.8.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sun L, Liao K, Wang D. Effects of magnolol and honokiol on adhesion, yeast-hyphal transition, and formation of biofilm by Candida albicans. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bala S, Sharma N, Kajal A, Kamboj S, Saini V. Mannich bases: an important pharmacophore in present scenario. Int. J. Med. Chem. 2014;2014:191072. doi: 10.1155/2014/191072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gul HI, Sahin F, Gul M, Ozturk S, Yerdelen KO. Evaluation of antimicrobial activities of several mannich bases and their derivatives. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 2005;338:335–338. doi: 10.1002/ardp.200400962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bayrak H, Demirbas A, Karaoglu SA, Demirbas N. Synthesis of some new 1,2,4-triazoles, their Mannich and Schiff bases and evaluation of their antimicrobial activities. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009;44:1057–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Roman G. Mannich bases in medicinal chemistry and drug design. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;89:743–816. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chakkravarthi K, Gokulakrishnan K, Suman T, Tamilvendan D. Synthesize, spectral, antimicrobial and antioxidant studies of diamide Mannich base derivatives. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2013;6:492–495. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lu Y, Su C, Unoje O, Liu H. Quorum sensing controls hyphal initiation in Candida albicans through Ubr1-mediated protein degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:1975–1980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318690111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lu Y, Su C, Liu H. Candida albicans hyphal initiation and elongation. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:707–714. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Singh BN, et al. Quercetin sensitizes fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans to induce apoptotic cell death by modulating quorum sensing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:2153–2168. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03599-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu H. Transcriptional control of dimorphism in Candida albicans. Curr Opin. Microbiol. 2001;4:728–735. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(01)00275-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.East SP, et al. DNA gyrase (GyrB)/topoisomerase IV (ParE) inhibitors: synthesis and antibacterial activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19:894–899. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.11.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Inglis DO, Sherlock G. Ras signaling gets fine-tuned: regulation of multiple pathogenic traits of Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell. 2013;12:1316–1325. doi: 10.1128/EC.00094-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thevelein JM. The RAS-adenylate cyclase pathway and cell cycle control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1992;62:109–130. doi: 10.1007/BF00584466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Uppuluri P, et al. The transcriptional regulator Nrg1p controls Candida albicans biofilm formation and dispersion. Eukaryot. Cell. 2010;9:1531–1537. doi: 10.1128/EC.00111-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Morici P, Fais R, Rizzato C, Tavanti A, Lupetti A. Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation by the synthetic lactoferricin derived peptide hLF1-11. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






