Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2018 Sep 18;74(Pt 10):1448–1450. doi: 10.1107/S2056989018012756

Crystal Structure of (E)-2-(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en-1-yl)aniline

Koji Kubono a, Keita Tani a,*, Masaaki Omote b, Futa Ogawa b, Taisuke Matsumoto c
PMCID: PMC6176427  PMID: 30319798

The mol­ecule adopts an E configuration at the C=C double bond. The dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the prop-1-enyl group is 25.4 (3)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked via N—H⋯F hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers which are linked into ribbons along the b axis by C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. The ribbons are linked by N—H⋯π and C—H⋯π inter­actions, generating a three-dimensional network.

Keywords: crystal structure; 3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en; aniline; hydrogen bonding

Abstract

The mol­ecule of the title compound, C9H8F3N, adopts an E configuration with respect to the C=C double bond. The dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the prop-1-enyl group is 25.4 (3)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked via pairs of N—H⋯F hydrogen bonds into inversion dimers with an R 2 2(16) ring motif. The dimers are linked by C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming a ribbon structure along the b-axis direction. The ribbons are linked by N—H⋯π and C—H⋯π inter­actions, generating a three-dimensional network.

Chemical context  

Fluorescein, rhodamine etc. are water-soluble fluorescent reagents. Their derivatives exhibit strong fluorescence in aqueous solution and so can be utilized as ion-probes and in bio-imaging (Aron et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016). However, complicated procedures are required to obtain them. It is therefore desirable to develop a new fluorescent reagent with a simple structure that can be obtained by a short-step synthetic process. The title compound has a quite simple structure and is a small mol­ecule, consisting of aniline and 3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-enyl units, which emits strong fluorescence not only in organic solvents but also in an aqueous medium (H2O/DMSO, 90:10, v/v). Since aniline derivatives with 2,4-bis­(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en­yl) have been used as fluoro­genic substrates for dipepeptidyl peptidase-4 (Ogawa et al., 2017), the title compound can be treated as a simple but essential component in emitting fluorescence. Hence, it is important to study the relationship between the fluorescent properties and the mol­ecular structure of the title compound. We report here its mol­ecular and crystal structure.graphic file with name e-74-01448-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. The mol­ecule adopts an E configuration with respect to the C=C double bond. The dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the prop-1-enyl group is 25.4 (3)°. The C5—C10—C11—C12 and C9—C10—C11—C12 torsion angles are −158.9 (3) and 24.6 (4)°, respectively. The bond lengths and angles in the title compound are normal and agree with those in other tri­fluoro­propenylaniline compounds (Shimizu et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2014).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound with the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal, two mol­ecules are associated through a pair of inter­molecular N—H⋯F hydrogen bonds (Table 1), forming a centrosymmetric dimer with an Inline graphic(16) ring motif (Fig. 2). The dimers are further linked by C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (Table 1), forming a ribbon with a C(6) chain motif along the b-axis direction. The ribbons are linked by N—H⋯π and C—H⋯π inter­actions (Table 1), generating a three-dimensional network.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

Cg1 is the centroid of the C5–C10 ring.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N4—H4A⋯F2i 0.90 (3) 2.46 (4) 3.352 (3) 169 (3)
C12—H12⋯N4ii 0.95 2.56 3.432 (4) 152
N4—H4BCg1iii 0.88 (3) 2.59 (4) 3.315 (2) 140 (3)
C9—H9⋯Cg1iv 0.95 2.73 3.480 (3) 136

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A packing diagram of the title compound, viewed along the b axis. The N—H⋯F and C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and N—H⋯π and C—H⋯π inter­actions are shown as dashed lines.

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.39; May 2018; Groom et al., 2016) gave 16 hits for 2-(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en-1-yl)aza­benzene derivatives, and gave 18 and 45 hits for (E)-3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-enyl and 2-amino­phenyl-1-enyl fragments, respectively. Of these structures, those that resemble the title compound are 4-[2-(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en-1-yl)phen­yl]morpholine (Lin et al., 2014), N-acetyl-N-{2-[(Z)-2-chloro-3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en­yl]phen­yl}acetamide (Niu et al., 2009) and (E,E)-1,4-di­piperidino-2,5-bis­(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en­yl)benzene (Shim­izu et al., 2009).

Synthesis and crystallization  

The title compound was prepared by a modification of a reported procedure (Omote et al., 2013). In a glove box purged with argon gas, iodo­aniline (1.0 mmol), (2-methyl­all­yl)palladium(II) chloride dimer (0.1mmol), CuF2 (2.0 mmol) and 2,2′-bipyridyl (2.0 mmol) were placed in a flask. To the flask were added anhydrous DMF (6.0 ml) and (E)-trimethyl-(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en­yl)silane (2.0 mmol), and the mixture was stirred at 353 K. After the reaction mixture had been stirred for 4 h, it was poured into ice–water. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2, and the organic layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After the solid had been filtered off, the solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the product in 68% yield. Colourless single crystals were obtained by recrystallization from an ethyl acetate–hexane (1:10, v/v) solution (m.p. 321–322 K). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 3.81 (2H, s), 6.13 (1H, qd, J = 15.9, 6.5 Hz), 6.72 (1H, dd, J = 8.2, 0.9 Hz), 6.80 (1H, dt, J = 7.5, 0.9 Hz), 7.18 (1H, dt, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz), 7.24 (1H, qd, J = 15.9, 2.1 Hz), 7.29 (1H, dd, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ: 116.6 (q, J = 33.4 Hz), 116.8, 119.2, 119.4, 123.6 (q, J = 269.0 Hz), 127.9, 130.9, 133.3 (q, J = 6.8 Hz), 144.8. 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ: 12.07 (3F, dd, J = 6.5, 2.2 Hz). MS m/z 187 (M +), HRMS calculated for C9H8F3N 187.1617 (M +), found 187.0603.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The amino H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined freely. The C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å) and refined using a riding model with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C). One outlier (Inline graphic11) was omitted in the last cycle of refinement.

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C9H8F3N
M r 187.16
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 123
a, b, c (Å) 7.3925 (4), 6.2777 (3), 18.6065 (9)
β (°) 96.243 (7)
V3) 858.37 (8)
Z 4
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.16
Crystal size (mm) 0.40 × 0.26 × 0.08
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID
Absorption correction Multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)
T min, T max 0.543, 0.912
No. of measured, independent and observed [F 2 > 2.0σ(F 2)] reflections 4753, 1566, 1178
R int 0.049
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.602
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.061, 0.175, 1.03
No. of reflections 1566
No. of parameters 126
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.49, −0.39

Computer programs: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 2006), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993), SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015), PLATON (Spek, 2009) and CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2016).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012756/is5499sup1.cif

e-74-01448-sup1.cif (164KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012756/is5499Isup2.hkl

e-74-01448-Isup2.hkl (126.4KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1866671

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C9H8F3N F(000) = 384.00
Mr = 187.16 Dx = 1.448 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54187 Å
a = 7.3925 (4) Å Cell parameters from 4006 reflections
b = 6.2777 (3) Å θ = 4.8–68.2°
c = 18.6065 (9) Å µ = 1.16 mm1
β = 96.243 (7)° T = 123 K
V = 858.37 (8) Å3 Platelet, colourless
Z = 4 0.40 × 0.26 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer 1178 reflections with F2 > 2.0σ(F2)
Detector resolution: 10.000 pixels mm-1 Rint = 0.049
ω scans θmax = 68.2°, θmin = 4.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.543, Tmax = 0.912 k = −6→7
4753 measured reflections l = −22→22
1566 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.175 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1029P)2 + 0.1188P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1566 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
126 parameters Δρmax = 0.49 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.39 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement was performed using all reflections. The weighted R-factor (wR) and goodness of fit (S) are based on F2. R-factor (gt) are based on F. The threshold expression of F2 > 2.0 sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factor (gt).

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
F1 0.2762 (3) −0.0078 (3) 0.52691 (8) 0.0597 (7)
F2 0.3860 (2) −0.3171 (3) 0.51696 (8) 0.0569 (6)
F3 0.0979 (2) −0.2730 (4) 0.50888 (9) 0.0661 (7)
N4 0.3895 (3) 0.4055 (4) 0.31939 (13) 0.0343 (6)
C5 0.3078 (3) 0.2521 (4) 0.27331 (13) 0.0272 (6)
C6 0.2853 (3) 0.2886 (4) 0.19799 (12) 0.0293 (6)
H6 0.3289 0.4171 0.1791 0.035*
C7 0.2009 (3) 0.1398 (4) 0.15202 (13) 0.0311 (6)
H7 0.1863 0.1670 0.1015 0.037*
C8 0.1362 (4) −0.0502 (4) 0.17775 (12) 0.0311 (6)
H8 0.0788 −0.1528 0.1453 0.037*
C9 0.1567 (3) −0.0871 (4) 0.25119 (12) 0.0276 (6)
H9 0.1123 −0.2164 0.2691 0.033*
C10 0.2413 (3) 0.0608 (4) 0.30004 (11) 0.0220 (6)
C11 0.2527 (3) 0.0253 (4) 0.37877 (12) 0.0276 (6)
H11 0.2651 0.1475 0.4090 0.033*
C12 0.2471 (3) −0.1615 (4) 0.41076 (12) 0.0310 (6)
H12 0.2410 −0.2856 0.3814 0.037*
C13 0.2497 (4) −0.1887 (4) 0.48945 (13) 0.0346 (7)
H4A 0.448 (4) 0.362 (6) 0.3618 (18) 0.070 (11)*
H4B 0.448 (5) 0.497 (5) 0.2944 (18) 0.067 (11)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
F1 0.1045 (18) 0.0494 (12) 0.0245 (8) 0.0050 (11) 0.0032 (10) −0.0071 (8)
F2 0.0673 (13) 0.0635 (13) 0.0370 (10) 0.0222 (10) −0.0073 (9) 0.0154 (8)
F3 0.0571 (12) 0.1073 (17) 0.0329 (9) −0.0274 (11) −0.0002 (8) 0.0251 (10)
N4 0.0379 (14) 0.0297 (13) 0.0346 (13) −0.0050 (11) 0.0003 (11) −0.0022 (11)
C5 0.0267 (13) 0.0255 (13) 0.0292 (13) 0.0036 (11) 0.0021 (10) −0.0008 (11)
C6 0.0319 (14) 0.0290 (14) 0.0271 (13) 0.0045 (12) 0.0035 (10) 0.0050 (11)
C7 0.0310 (14) 0.0389 (16) 0.0236 (12) 0.0041 (12) 0.0035 (10) 0.0037 (11)
C8 0.0332 (15) 0.0355 (15) 0.0239 (13) −0.0023 (12) 0.0000 (11) −0.0043 (11)
C9 0.0295 (13) 0.0276 (14) 0.0254 (12) 0.0026 (12) 0.0009 (10) 0.0004 (11)
C10 0.0211 (13) 0.0241 (13) 0.0201 (11) 0.0020 (10) −0.0010 (9) −0.0007 (10)
C11 0.0295 (15) 0.0293 (14) 0.0232 (12) 0.0010 (11) −0.0008 (10) −0.0024 (10)
C12 0.0388 (15) 0.0315 (15) 0.0218 (12) 0.0012 (12) −0.0008 (11) 0.0002 (11)
C13 0.0400 (16) 0.0373 (16) 0.0254 (13) 0.0004 (13) −0.0013 (11) 0.0035 (11)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

F1—C13 1.336 (3) C7—H7 0.9500
F2—C13 1.348 (3) C8—C9 1.378 (3)
F3—C13 1.326 (3) C8—H8 0.9500
N4—C5 1.383 (3) C9—C10 1.398 (3)
N4—H4A 0.90 (3) C9—H9 0.9500
N4—H4B 0.88 (3) C10—C11 1.475 (3)
C5—C10 1.409 (3) C11—C12 1.318 (3)
C5—C6 1.412 (3) C11—H11 0.9500
C6—C7 1.371 (3) C12—C13 1.472 (3)
C6—H6 0.9500 C12—H12 0.9500
C7—C8 1.389 (4)
C5—N4—H4A 118 (2) C10—C9—H9 119.1
C5—N4—H4B 109 (2) C9—C10—C5 119.0 (2)
H4A—N4—H4B 116 (3) C9—C10—C11 121.2 (2)
N4—C5—C10 121.3 (2) C5—C10—C11 119.7 (2)
N4—C5—C6 119.9 (2) C12—C11—C10 125.6 (2)
C10—C5—C6 118.7 (2) C12—C11—H11 117.2
C7—C6—C5 120.3 (2) C10—C11—H11 117.2
C7—C6—H6 119.8 C11—C12—C13 123.7 (2)
C5—C6—H6 119.8 C11—C12—H12 118.1
C6—C7—C8 121.4 (2) C13—C12—H12 118.1
C6—C7—H7 119.3 F3—C13—F1 106.1 (2)
C8—C7—H7 119.3 F3—C13—F2 106.1 (2)
C9—C8—C7 118.7 (2) F1—C13—F2 104.4 (2)
C9—C8—H8 120.6 F3—C13—C12 113.4 (2)
C7—C8—H8 120.6 F1—C13—C12 113.9 (2)
C8—C9—C10 121.8 (2) F2—C13—C12 112.1 (2)
C8—C9—H9 119.1
N4—C5—C6—C7 −178.5 (2) N4—C5—C10—C11 2.2 (4)
C10—C5—C6—C7 −0.3 (4) C6—C5—C10—C11 −176.1 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C8 −0.3 (4) C9—C10—C11—C12 24.6 (4)
C6—C7—C8—C9 0.5 (4) C5—C10—C11—C12 −158.9 (3)
C7—C8—C9—C10 −0.3 (4) C10—C11—C12—C13 −176.8 (2)
C8—C9—C10—C5 −0.2 (4) C11—C12—C13—F3 115.4 (3)
C8—C9—C10—C11 176.3 (2) C11—C12—C13—F1 −6.2 (4)
N4—C5—C10—C9 178.7 (2) C11—C12—C13—F2 −124.5 (3)
C6—C5—C10—C9 0.5 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

Cg1 is the centroid of the C5–C10 ring.

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N4—H4A···F2i 0.90 (3) 2.46 (4) 3.352 (3) 169 (3)
C12—H12···N4ii 0.95 2.56 3.432 (4) 152
N4—H4B···Cg1iii 0.88 (3) 2.59 (4) 3.315 (2) 140 (3)
C9—H9···Cg1iv 0.95 2.73 3.480 (3) 136

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (ii) x, y−1, z; (iii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Cooperative Research Program of Network Joint Reserarch Center for Materials and Devices (Institute for Materials Chemistry and Engineering, Kyushu University) (No. 20181296) grant .

References

  1. Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C. & Guagliardi, A. (1993). J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 343–350.
  2. Aron, A. T., Loehr, M. O., Bogena, J. & Chang, C. J. (2016). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14338–14346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Higashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Li, D., Li, C.-Y., Li, Y.-F., Li, Z. & Xu, F. (2016). Anal. Chim. Acta, 934, 218–225. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Lin, Q.-Y., Xu, X.-H. & Qing, F.-L. (2014). J. Org. Chem. 79, 10434–10446. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Niu, J.-J., Li, Z.-G. & Xu, J.-W. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Ogawa, F., Takeda, M., Miyanaga, K., Tani, K., Yamazawa, R., Ito, K., Tarui, A., Sato, A. & Omote, M. (2017). Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 13, 2690–2697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Omote, M., Tanaka, M., Tanaka, M., Ikeda, A., Tarui, A., Sato, K. & Ando, A. (2013). J. Org. Chem. 78, 6196–6201. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Rigaku (2006). RAPID-AUTO. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  11. Rigaku (2016). CrystalStructure. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  13. Shimizu, M., Takeda, Y., Higashi, M. & Hiyama, T. (2009). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 3653–3656. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012756/is5499sup1.cif

e-74-01448-sup1.cif (164KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012756/is5499Isup2.hkl

e-74-01448-Isup2.hkl (126.4KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1866671

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES