Skip to main content
Journal of Nutritional Science logoLink to Journal of Nutritional Science
. 2018 Oct 2;7:e26. doi: 10.1017/jns.2018.17

Effects of gene polymorphisms of metabolic enzymes on the association between red and processed meat consumption and the development of colon cancer; a literature review

S Doaei 1,2, M Hajiesmaeil 3, A Aminifard 4, S A Mosavi-Jarrahi 5, M E Akbari 2, M Gholamalizadeh 6,*
PMCID: PMC6176493  PMID: 30305892

Abstract

The role of environmental factors and genetic susceptibility in the development of colon cancer (CC) has been already proven, but the role of gene polymorphisms in modifying the risk of environmental factors such as nutritional factors is still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of polymorphisms of involved genes in the association between red meat consumption and the development of CC. The present review was carried out using keywords such as polymorphism and/or protein and/or red meat and/or processed meat and/or colon cancer. PubMed and Science Direct databases were used to collect all related articles published from 2001 to 2017. The presence of SNP in the coding genes of proteins involved in metabolism of nutrients could play significant roles in the extent of the effects of nutrition in the development of CC. The effect of dietary proteins greatly depends on the polymorphisms in the metabolising genes of these substances. Gene polymorphisms may have a role in colorectal cancer risk, especially in people with high meat intake, and this leads to a difference in the effects of meat consumption in different individuals. To conclude, dietary recommendations for the prevention and control of CC should be modified based on the genotype of different individuals. Increasing our knowledge on this field of nutritional genomics can lead to personalised preventive and therapeutic recommendations for CC patients.

Key words: Colon cancer, Polymorphisms, Protein, Colorectal cancer

Abbreviations: CC, colon cancer; COX, cyclo-oxygenase; CRC, colorectal cancer; CYP, cytochrome P450; MutS, mutator S; NAT, N-acetyltransferase; NER, nucleotide excision repair; XP, xeroderma pigmentosum


Colon cancer (CC), also known as colorectal cancer (CRC), is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide(1). The prevalence of CC among Iranian people was between 7 and 8 per 100 000 people, with a significant increase over the last several years(2).

In most cases, CC occurs in people aged 50 years or older and the risk of CC recurrence is increased with age(3). It has been reported that about 6 to 7 % of CC cases have a genetic origin. Approximately 10 to 15 % of CRC occur in patients where at least one of his/her relatives also had CC(4). Also, some hereditary syndromes are also effective on the risk of CC including Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome(5). In addition, some environmental factors such as alcohol consumption, smoking, physical inactivity, high-fat diet and consumption of red and processed meat are also considered as risk factors for CRC(3). Recent studies reported that change in the expression level of some genes is also a mechanism involved in the effects of these environmental factors(68). Moreover, some people are at higher risk for CC because of their genotype(9). In other words, the development of CRC is a complex process that involves positive and negative interactions between genes and environmental factors. In the present study, the effects of the interactions between gene polymorphisms and red and processed meat consumption on the risk of CC have been reviewed.

Red and processed meat and colon cancer

Many studies have shown that there is a significant association between a red and processed meat-rich diet and CRC(10,11). This association has been attributed to several dietary factors, including heterocyclic amines, aromatic hydrocarbons produced during high temperature heating processes, N-nitrosamines that are found in many food products after nitrite addition and processed meat that contains high levels of preservatives. The polymorphisms in some genes involved in the metabolism of these components and risk of CC are discussed below.

N-acetyltransferases

Many studies have examined the enzymes involved in the metabolism of amines and heterocyclic amines and suggested a significant relationship between polymorphisms of these enzymes and risk of CC(12,13). Heterocyclic amines are produced during cooking meat at high temperatures. N-acetyltransferases (NAT) are important enzymes in the metabolic activation of heterocyclic amines, which are found in two forms of NAT1 and NAT2. The rs1495741 polymorphism of NAT2 was strongly related to its activity and the GG, AG and AA genotypes are classified as enzymes with rapid, intermediate and slow activity, respectively. In people with the GG genotype of this polymorphism, there is a strong association between the consumption of red meat and the risk of CRC(1214). Another study reported that cooking meat at a high temperature increased the risk of CC in people with NAT2 gene polymorphisms(15). However, Barrett et al.(16) provide no support for the hypothesis that those with the fast phenotype of NAT2 are at increased risk of CRC.

A study was conducted on 147 CRC patients (seventy-six women and ninety men); the cancer risk in women was found to be lower in the NAT intermediate activity phenotype, but this difference was not found in men. It has also been reported that in people with the GG genotype of NAT2 G857A, meat intake more than three times per week increased CRC risk(17). However, some other studies failed to find any interaction between GG genotype, meat intake and CRC(1820). For example, Chan et al.(20) reported that there was no interaction between the amount of meat consumed with NAT1 and NAT2 and the risk of developing CRC. Overall, it can be concluded that NAT2 gene polymorphisms may have a role in CRC risk, especially in people with high meat intake.

Cyclo-oxygenases

Cyclo-oxygenases (COX) play a key role in converting arachidonic acid into prostaglandins. Red meat contains a substantial amount of arachidonic acid and most probably is involved in the inflammatory response and initiation of CC especially in people with a polymorphism in the COX-1 and COX-2 genes. This polymorphism occurs in the promoter region of the gene, resulting in a possible increase in gene expression with consequent elevation of levels of the COX-2 protein. Individuals who carry the polymorphisms that could affect the expressions of COX-2 are more susceptible to CC(21). There are two isoforms of the COX enzyme, COX-1 (or prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1; PTGS1), that produces PG1, and COX-2 (or PTGS2), which produces PG2. The rs20417 (−765G > C) and rs5275 (8473T > C) polymorphisms of COX-2 play an important role in many cancers such as gastric cancer, prostate cancer and CRC. Some studies have also shown that the COX-2 rs1195AA genotype can also play a supportive role in the development of CRC. Makar et al.(22) showed that polymorphism rs20417 (−765G > C) in the COX-2 gene increases the risk of rectal cancer by up to two times higher than others. No significant relationship was reported between COX-1 gene polymorphisms and CRC in this study. In one meta-analysis study, there was a significant relationship between the COX-2 rs20417 polymorphism and the risk of CRC in an Asian population(23). Andersen et al.(24) suggested that the relationship between the COX-2 rs20417 polymorphism and the risk of CRC is influenced by dietary meat intake and COX-2 rs20417 risk allele carriers were at 8 % increased risk of CRC per 25 g/d higher red meat or processed meat intake. Generally, it can be concluded that COX-2 gene polymorphisms may have a role in CRC risk, especially in people with higher meat intake.

Cytochrome P450 2E1 and cytochrome P450 1A2

CRC is associated with environmental factors such as cigarette smoking, and consuming cooked meats and fish at high temperature. These factors result in the formation of carcinogenic compounds including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, arylamines and heterocyclic amines. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are critically important for the metabolism of these carcinogens by N oxidation(25). CYP2E1 is an enzyme that plays a key role in the metabolism of nitrosamines and other carcinogens(26). The RsaI polymorphism of CYP2E1 (C2 allele) is associated with an increased risk of CRC(26,27). The RsaI polymorphism has been shown to affect its transcription level. The variant type of this polymorphic site can enhance transcription and increase the level of CYP2E1 enzymic activity in vitro(10).

Some studies have also shown that individuals carrying a variant of the C2 allele have lower enzyme activity. In the Hawaiian population, it has been shown that the risk of CC has decreased in subjects carrying the RsaI C2 allele(27). On the other hand, a study in China showed that homozygous individuals for the C2 allele were also more likely to develop CRC(28). Moreover, in some other studies, no relationship was observed between RsaI polymorphisms and the risk of CRC(29). Interestingly, Morita et al.(30) showed that there is a significant relationship between red meat consumption and an increased risk of CC in the individuals carrying the RsaI C2 allele. However, another study reported that no significant relationship was observed between the the CYP2E1 RsaI polymorphism, red meat consumption and CC(31).

CYP1A2, a member of the cytochrome P450 mixed-function oxidase system, is involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics in the body(32). Some studies have shown that individuals carrying CYP1A2 polymorphisms are at higher risk of developing rectal cancer but not for CC(3335). In a case–control study on CYP1A2 polymorphisms, it was found that there was a significant relationship between the consumption of cooked meat at high temperature in −154A > C polymorphism carriers of CYP1A2 and the risk of CRC. Overall, it is possible that CYP2E1 and CYP1A2 gene polymorphisms may have a role in CRC risk, especially in people with higher meat intake.

Nucleotide excision repair pathway

The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway plays an important role in repairing damaged DNA. The NER pathway is a particularly important excision mechanism that removes DNA damage induced by UV light and environmental carcinogens(36). Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) complementation group A (XPA), XP complementation group C (XPC) and XP complementation group D (XPD) are important enzymes in the NER pathway. There is a significant relationship between polymorphisms in XPA, XPC and XPD and a lower capacity of DNA repair. Numerous polymorphisms of NER genes have been identified and these changes individually or in combination may adversely affect NER fidelity, which could contribute to the risk of CRC. Four polymorphisms of these genes including A23G in XPA, Lys939Gln in XPC, and Lys751Gln and Asp312Asn in XPD have been identified that may have a significant relationship with the risk of CC(37). For example, in a study conducted by Hansen et al.(38), a lower risk of cancer was reported in women with the Lys751Gln polymorphism of XPD. In homozygous individuals with the XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism, the risk of CC was increased by 3·7 times per 100 g/d increased intake of red meat. In the individuals carrying the wild-type allele, meat has no effect on CRC. No significant relationship was observed between other polymorphisms and CC.

Moreover, it was shown that people with a high consumption of red meat and XPD 312Asp and XPD 751Lys risk alleles have a higher chance of developing CRC than those with XPD 312Asn and XPD 751Gln alleles(39). There is also a statistically significant interaction between Lys939Gln of XPC and A23G of XPA with red meat and processed meat intake and the risk of CC(38,40). Overall, it can be concluding that higher meat intake may have a role in CRC risk, especially in people with polymorphisms in genes involved in the NER pathway.

DNA mismatch repair (mutator S)

A DNA mismatch repair protein, also known as mutator S (MutS), participates in the DNA mismatch repair system. In a study conducted on the polymorphisms of this gene, it was found that some gene polymorphisms were associated with an increased risk of CC. Processed meat intake could increase CC risk in people with the MutS polymorphism(41). In another study, a significant relationship was observed between processed meat intake, the – polymorphism of the MutS gene and the risk of CC(42). In general, it can be concluded that MutS polymorphisms may have a role in CRC risk, especially in people with higher processed meat intake.

Discussion

The presence of SNP associated with the metabolism and function of proteins could play an important role in the effects of red meat consumption on the risk of CC.

Several individual SNP have been associated with CC risk. It is plausible that a set of SNP derived from genetic pathways that are critical in colon carcinogenesis could contribute to the cancer risk. We investigated the role of polymorphisms involved in five metabolic pathways that are relevant for the activation or detoxification of carcinogens formed during red meat processing. The polymorphisms investigated in the present study were mostly functional polymorphisms that alter the expression of genes participating in metabolic pathways associated with carcinogenesis(43).

Recent studies demonstrated the modifier role of NAT2 G857A, COX-2 rs20417, CYP2E1 RsaI, CYP1A2 154A>C, XPC Lys939Gln, XPA A23G and MutS T1036A on the effect of red meat consumption on CRC risk. However, some studies failed to identify an association between red meat consumption and the effect of these polymorphisms on CRC risk. Possible explanations for the discrepancy might include differences in meat variable definitions, and lack of stratification by tumour subsite in these studies. Moreover, other factors including frequency of turning the meat over during the cooking process, meat thickness, cut of meat, use of marinade or thawing meat in the microwave were not considered and may have contributed to these contradictory results(44).

Conclusion

In conclusion, some gene polymorphisms may have a significant role in CRC risk, especially in people with higher processed meat intake. Increasing the knowledge on nutritional genomics can lead to the finding of new methods to prevent, treat and control of CC. A summary of descriptions of studies is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of study descriptions and outcomes

Reference Title Study design Sample characteristic Examined components Main findings
NAT
 Wang et al. (2015)(12) Interaction between red meat intake and NAT2 genotype in increasing the risk of CRC in Japanese and African Americans Meta-analyses 2744 cases, 8315 controls NAT genotype (SNP rs1495741) In people with GG genotype (rapid NAT2 phenotype) of this polymorphism, there is a strong association between consumption of red meat and the risk of CRC
 Ananthakrishnan et al. (2015)(13) Red meat intake, NAT2, and risk of CRC: pooled analysis of 11 studies Pooled analysis 8290 cases, 9115 controls NAT2 phenotype based on polymorphism at rs1495741 High red meat consumption was similarly associated with CRC in those with a rapid/intermediate NAT2 genotype
 Barrett et al. (2003)(16) Investigation of interaction between NAT2 and HA as potential risk factors for CRC Case–control study 484 cases, 738 controls NAT2 phenotype This study provides no support for the hypothesis that fast NAT2 acetylators are at increased risk of CRC, even if exposed to high levels of HA from well-cooked meat or smoking
 Sørensen et al. (2008)(14) Prospective study of NAT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms, tobacco smoking and meat consumption and risk of CRC Case–control study 379 cases, 769 controls NAT 1 and NAT2 fast and slow NAT acetylator phenotypes There were statistically significant associations between consumption of brown-dark pan-fried meat and increased CRC risk. NAT1 fast acetylators had a significantly higher risk of CRC than NAT1 slow acetylators, whereas NAT2 acetylator phenotype did not affect the CRC risk
 Lilla et al. (2006)(15) Effect of NAT1 and NAT2 genetic polymorphisms on CRC risk associated with exposure to tobacco smoke and meat consumption Case–control study 505 patients with incident CRC, 604 controls NAT 1 and NAT2 fast and slow NAT acetylator phenotypes Cooking meat at high temperature increased the risk of CC in people with NAT2 gene polymorphisms
 Procopciuc et al. (2017)(17) NAT2/environmental factors and their association as a modulating risk factor for sporadic colon and rectal cancer Case–control study 150 cases, 162 controls NAT2 phenotypes Fried red meat, alcohol and smoking increase the risk of sporadic CRC, especially of colon cancer, in the case of rapid acetylators for the NAT2 variants
 Da Silva et al. (2011)(18) NAT2 genetic polymorphisms and risk of CRC Case–control study 147 patients with CRC, 162 controls People with GG genotype (NAT2 fast acetylators) Among NAT2 fast acetylators, meat intake more than three times per week increased the risk of CRC
 Tiemersma et al. (2002)(19) Meat consumption, cigarette smoking and genetic susceptibility in the aetiology of CRC Case–control study 102 incident CRC cases, 537 controls NAT2 gene polymorphisms (NAT2 fast acetylators) This study found no association between GG genotype and CRC
 Chan et al. (2005)(20) Prospective study of NAT2 genotypes, meat intake, smoking and risk of CRC Nested case–control study 183 women with CRC, 443 controls NAT2 gene polymorphisms This study found no interaction between meat consumption with NAT2 and CRC
COX
 Zhu et al. (2010)(45) −2765G>C and 8473T > C polymorphisms of COX-2 and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 33 case–control studies Meta-analyses 19 100 cases, 29 777 controls COX-2 gene, −2765G > C and 8473T > C polymorphisms This study suggested that −765G > C may cause an increased risk of colorectal carcinoma in those of Asian descent
 Makar et al. (2013)(22) COX-1 (PTGS1) and COX-2 (PTGS2) polymorphisms, NSAID interactions, and risk of colon and rectal cancers in two independent populations Case–control study 2053 colon and rectal cancer patients, 2648 controls COX-2 gene, rs20417 (−765G> C) polymorphism The rs20417 (−765G > C) polymorphism in the COX-2 gene increases the risk of rectal cancer by up to two times. However, no significant relationship was reported between PTGS1 and CRC in this study
 Andersen et al. (2013)(24) Interactions between diet, lifestyle and IL-10, IL-1B and PTGS2/COX-2 gene polymorphisms in relation to risk of CRC in a prospective Danish case–cohort study Case–control study 9070 CRC cases, 1789 controls COX-2 gene, −765G>C polymorphism Suggested that COX-2 −765G < C risk allele carriers were at 8 % increased risk of CRC per 25 g red meat or processed meat intake per d
CYP2E1
 Le Marchand et al. (2002)(10) Red meat intake, CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms, and CRC risk Case–control study 521 patients with CRC, 639 controls Polymorphisms in CYP2E1 This study showed that individuals carrying a variant of the C2 allele have lower enzyme activity
 van der Logt et al. (2006)(28) Role of epoxide hydrolase, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, CYP2E1 or alcohol dehydrogenase genotypes in susceptibility to CRC Case–control study 371 patients with sporadic CRC, 415 healthy controls Polymorphisms in CYP2E1 Homozygous individuals for the C2 allele were also more likely to develop CRC
 Morita et al. (2009)(30) Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2E1 and risk of CRC: the Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study Case–control study 685 incident cases of CRC, 778 controls Polymorphisms in CYP2E1 Risk of cancer in individuals carrying CYP2E1 Rsa I C2 allele decreases in comparison with patients carrying CYP2E1 96-bp insertion
 Wang et al. (2012)(32) Carcinogen metabolism genes, red meat and poultry intake, and CRC risk Case–control study 577 cases, 307 controls −154A>C polymorphism of CYP1A2 There was a significant relationship between the −154A>C polymorphism of CYP1A2 and consumption of cooked meat at high temperature with the risk of CRC
Nucleotide excision repair pathway
 Khan et al. (2000)(37) A new XPC poly(AT) insertion/deletion polymorphism Case–control study 419 cases, 219 controls Four polymorphisms including A23G in XPA, Lys939Gln in XPC, and Lys751Gln and Asp312Asn in XPD Significant relationship with the risk of CC
 Hansen et al. (2007)(38) XPA A23G, XPC Lys939Gln, XPD Lys751Gln and XPD Asp312Asn polymorphisms, interactions with smoking, alcohol and dietary factors, and risk of CRC Case–control study 405 CRC cases, 810 controls XPC Lys939Gln, XPA A23G, XPD Lys751Gln, and XPD Asp312Asn polymorphisms This study showed lower risk of cancer in women with Lys751Gln polymorphism of XPD and in homozygous individuals for XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism increased CC
 Joshi et al. (2009)(39) Red meat and poultry intake, polymorphisms in the nucleotide excision repair and mismatch repair pathways and CRC risk Case–control study 577 cases, 307 controls XPD 312ASP and XPD 751Lys People with high consumption of red meat and XPD 312ASP and XPD 751Lys risk alleles have a higher chance of CRC. The consumption of poultry meat in the carriers of the XPD 751Lys allele increased risk of CC
 Steck et al. (2014)(40) Nucleotide excision repair gene polymorphisms, meat intake and colon cancer risk Case–control study 331 African Americans with colon cancer, 544 controls XPC (A499V and K939Q), XPD (D312N and K751Q), XPF (R415Q), XPG (D1104H) genotypes This study showed the statistically significant positive association between colon cancer risk and XPC 499 AV + VV genotype and an inverse association with XPC 939 QQ
DNA mismatch repair (MutS)
 Berndt et al. (2007)(41) Mismatch repair polymorphisms and the risk of CRC Case–control study 237 CRC cases and a subcohort of 2189 participants Four SNP in three mismatch repair genes (MSH3 R940Q, MSH3 T1036A, MSH6 G39E and MLH1 I219V) were genotyped Processed meat intake appeared to modify the association between MSH3 polymorphisms and CRC

NAT, N-acetyltransferase; CRC, colorectal cancer; HA, heterocyclic amines; COX, cyclo-oxygenase; PTGS, prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; CYP2E1, cytochrome P450 2E1; XP, xeroderma pigmentosum; MutS, mutator S; MSH, MutS homolog 3; MLH, MutL homolog 1.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Student Research Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (code 1396/54017). The authors contributed equally to this work.

None of the authors reported a conflict of interest related to the study.

References

  • 1.Slattery ML, Yakumo K, Hoffman M, et al. (2004) Variants of the VDR gene and risk of colon cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12, 359–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kolahdoozan SH, Sadjadi A, Radmard A, et al. (2010) Five common cancers in Iran. Arch Iran Med 13, 143–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Becker N (2003) Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Radiologe 43, 98–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwartz SI (1999) Principles of Surgery, 7th ed., pp. 1328–1352. New York: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Borji M (2017) Investigating the effect of home care on death anxiety in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Govaresh 22, 131–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Doaei S, Kalantari N, Mohammadi NK, et al. (2017) Macronutrients and the FTO gene expression in hypothalamus; a systematic review of experimental studies. Indian Heart J 69, 277–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kalantari N, Doaei S, Keshavarz-Mohammadi N, et al. (2016) Review of studies on the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene interactions with environmental factors affecting on obesity and its impact on lifestyle interventions. ARYA Atheroscler 12, 281. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Akbari ME, Doaei S, Gholamalizadeh M, et al. (2018) FTO gene affects obesity and breast cancer through similar mechanisms: a new insight into the molecular therapeutic targets. Nutr Cancer 70, 30–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kalantari N, Mohammadi NK, Rafieifar S, et al. (2017) Indicator for success of obesity reduction programs in adolescents: body composition or body mass index? Evaluating a school-based health promotion project after 12 weeks of intervention. Int J Prev Med 8, 73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Seifried A, et al. (2002) Red meat intake, CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11, 1019–1024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brink M, Weijenberg MP, De Goeij AF, et al. (2005) Meat consumption and K-ras mutations in sporadic colon and rectal cancer in The Netherlands Cohort Study. Br J Cancer 92, 1310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang H, Iwasaki M, Haiman CA, et al. (2015) Interaction between red meat intake and NAT2 genotype in increasing the risk of colorectal cancer in Japanese and African Americans. PLOS ONE 10, e0144955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ananthakrishnan AN, Du M, Berndt SI, et al. (2015) Red meat intake, NAT2, and risk of colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 11 studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24, 198–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sørensen M, Autrup H, Olsen A, et al. (2008) Prospective study of NAT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms, tobacco smoking and meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett 266, 186–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lilla C, Verla-Tebit E, Risch A, et al. (2006) Effect of NAT1 and NAT2 genetic polymorphisms on colorectal cancer risk associated with exposure to tobacco smoke and meat consumption. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15, 99–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barrett JH, Smith G, Waxman R, et al. (2003) Investigation of interaction between N-acetyltransferase 2 and heterocyclic amines as potential risk factors for colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis 24, 275–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Procopciuc LM, Osian G & Iancu M (2017) N-acetyl transferase 2/environmental factors and their association as a modulating risk factor for sporadic colon and rectal cancer. J Clin Lab Anal 5, e22098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Da Silva TD, Felipe AV, de Lima JM, et al. (2011) N-acetyltransferase 2 genetic polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 17, 760–765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tiemersma EW, Kampman E, Bueno de Mesquita HB, et al. (2002) Meat consumption, cigarette smoking, and genetic susceptibility in the etiology of colorectal cancer: results from a Dutch prospective study. Cancer Causes Control 13, 383–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chan AT, Tranah GJ, Giovannucci EL, et al. (2005) Prospective study of N-acetyltransferase-2 genotypes, meat intake, smoking and risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 115, 648–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shalaby MA, Nounou HA, Ms A, et al. (2014) Associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms of COX-2 and MMP-2 genes and colorectal cancer susceptibility in the Saudi population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15, 4989–4994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Makar KW, Poole EM, Resler AJ, et al. (2013) COX-1 (PTGS1) and COX-2 (PTGS2) polymorphisms, NSAID interactions, and risk of colon and rectal cancers in two independent populations. Cancer Causes Control 24, 2059–2075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Peng Q, Yang S, Lao X, et al. (2014) Meta-analysis of the association between COX-2 polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer based on case–control studies. PLOS ONE 9, e94790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Andersen V, Holst R, Kopp TI, et al. (2013) Interactions between diet, lifestyle and IL10, IL1B, and PTGS2/COX-2 gene polymorphisms in relation to risk of colorectal cancer in a prospective Danish case–cohort study. PLOS ONE 8, e78366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yoshida K, Osawa K, Kasahara M, et al. (2007) Association of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, GSTM1 and NAT2 gene polymorphisms with colorectal cancer and smoking. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 8, 438–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hayashi S, Watanabe J & Kawajiri K (1991) Genetic polymorphisms in the 5′-flanking region change transcriptional regulation of the human cytochrome P450IIE1 gene. J Biochem 110, 559–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shahriary GM, Galehdari H, Jalali A, et al. (2012) CYP2E1* 5b, CYP2E1* 6, CYP2E1* 7B, CYP2E1* 2, and CYP2E1* 3 allele frequencies in Iranian populations. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13, 6505–6510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Van der Logt EMJ, Bergevoet SM, Roelofs HMJ, et al. (2006) Role of epoxide hydrolase, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, cytochrome P450 2E1or alcohol dehydrogenase genotypes in susceptibility to colorectal cancer. Mutat Res 593, 39–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gao CM, Takezaki T, Wu JZ, et al. (2007) CYP2E1 Rsa I polymorphism impacts on risk of colorectal cancer association with smoking and alcohol drinking. World J Gastroenterol 13, 5725–5730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Morita M, Le Marchand L, Kono S, et al. (2009) Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2E1 and risk of colorectal cancer: The Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18, 235–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Silva TD, Felipe AV, Pimenta CA, et al. (2012) CYP2E1 RsaI and 96-bp insertion genetic polymorphisms associated with risk for colorectal cancer. Genet Mol Res 11, 3138–3145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang J, Joshi AD, Corral R, et al. (2012) Carcinogen metabolism genes, red meat and poultry intake, and colorectal cancer risk. Int J Cancer 130, 1898–1907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Le Marchand L, Wilkinson GR & Wilkens LR (1999) Genetic and dietary predictors of CYP2E1 activity: a phenotyping study in Hawaii Japanese using chlorzoxazone. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 8, 495–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Le Marchand L, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, et al. (2001) Combined effect of well-done red meat, smoking and rapid N-acetyltransferase 2 and CYP1A2 phenotypes in increasing colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 10, 1259–1266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cotterchio M, Boucher BA, Manno M, et al. (2008) Red meat intake, doneness, polymorphisms in genes that encode carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17, 3098–3107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Qiao Y, Spitz MR, Shen H, et al. (2002) Modulation of repair of ultraviolet damage in the host-cell reactivation assay by polymorphic XPC and XPD/ERCC2 genotypes. Carcinogenesis 23, 295–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Khan SG, Metter EJ, Tarone RE, et al. (2000) A new xeroderma pigmentosum group C poly(AT) insertion/deletion polymorphism. Carcinogenesis 21, 1821–1825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hansen RD, Sørensen M, Tjønneland A, et al. (2007) XPA A23G, XPC Lys939Gln, XPD Lys751Gln and XPD Asp312Asn polymorphisms, interactions with smoking, alcohol and dietary factors, and risk of colorectal cancer. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 619, 68–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Joshi AD, Corral R, Siegmund KD, et al. (2009) Red meat and poultry intake, polymorphisms in the nucleotide excision repair and mismatch repair pathways and colorectal cancer risk. Carcinogenesis 30, 472–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Steck SE, Butler LM, Keku T, et al. (2014) Nucleotide excision repair gene polymorphisms, meat intake and colon cancer risk. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 762, 24–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Berndt SI, Platz EA, Fallin MD, et al. (2007) Mismatch repair polymorphisms and the risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 120, 1548–1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Laporte GA, Leguisamo NM, Kalil AN, et al. (2018) Clinical importance of DNA repair in sporadic colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 126, 168–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Goodman JE, Mechanic LE, Luke BT, et al. (2006) Exploring SNP–SNP interactions and colon cancer risk using polymorphism interaction analysis. Int J Cancer 118, 1790–1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ho V, Peacock S, Massey TE, et al. (2014) Meat-derived carcinogens, genetic susceptibility and colorectal adenoma risk. Genes Nutr 9, 430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhu W, Wei BB, Shan X, et al. (2010) -765G>C and 8473T>C polymorphisms of COX-2 and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 33 case–control studies. Mol Biol Rep 37, 277–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Nutritional Science are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES