Abstract
During the asexual intra-erythrocytic cycle, Plasmodium (P.) falciparum exports parasitic proteins to the surface of infected red blood cells (iRBCs) facilitating its cytoadhesion to various endothelial host receptors. This adhesive behavior is a critical contributor towards disease manifestation. However, little is known about the influence of recurring elevated temperature – a common symptom of the malaria infection – on the adhesive properties of iRBCs to endothelial receptors. To address this, we performed dual-micropipette step-pressure technique between P. falciparum (strain FCR3CSA) iRBCs and Chinese Hamster Ovary cells expressing Chondroitin sulfate A (CHO-CSA) after transient iRBCs incubation at febrile temperatures which revealed increase in adhesion parameters. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis revealed an increase in phosphatidylserine (PS) expression on the iRBC surface following exposure to febrile temperature. The adhesion between iRBCs and CHO-CSA cells was remarkably reduced in presence of soluble Annexin V, indicating the mediation of PS on the adhesion events. Our results suggest that elevated PS recruitment on iRBC under thermally stressed conditions contributes to the increased adhesive behavior of iRBCs CSA-binding phenotype to CHO-CSA.
Introduction
Malaria is the most prevalent blood-borne infectious disease caused by protozoan parasites of the species Plasmodium. About half of the world’s population inhabits a malaria endemic regions. In 2016, 216 million malaria infections were reported resulting in 445,000 deaths1. During the intra-erythrocytic asexual cycle, Plasmodium falciparum, the most common causative agent of malaria-associated pathology in humans, modifies the infected red blood cells (iRBCs) extensively. IRBCs become less deformable and eventually adhere to the blood vessel walls to avoid clearance by the spleen2–6. The adherence of iRBCs to blood vessel walls induces microvasculature obstruction, reduces microcirculatory flow and can cause a fatal outcome.
To establish adherence to the endothelial cells, P. falciparum rely on several parasite proteins that are exported to the surface of iRBCs. The P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1) is one such adhesive ligand exported to the iRBC membrane. It is encoded by the ‘var’ gene family and contains multiple unique domains to facilitate efficient binding to a variety of host receptors including CD36, ICAM1 and CSA7,8. Several other adhesive ligands, such as RIFIN, STEVOR and ring surface protein 2 (RSP-2) have also been identified as key molecules contributing to the increased adhesive behavior of iRBCs9–13. Moreover, previous studies reported that a phospholipid component residing on the inner-leaflet of the red blood cell (RBC) lipid bilayer, phosphatidylserine (PS), to significantly enhance the RBC adhesiveness (in both healthy and infected RBCs) particularly to TSP and CD369,14,15. Phosphatidylserine can be flipped out to the surface of RBCs upon long-term exposure (>24 h) to thermally or oxidatively stressed condition15–17.
The binding strength and kinetic parameters between host receptors and corresponding ligands provide important information towards better understanding of iRBC sequestration. Several studies have quantified the binding strength between PfEMP1 and different host receptors18–20. These reports predominantly outline the interactions at room temperature (23 °C) and at normal body temperature (37 °C), whereas the effect of fever is less explored within the context of receptor-ligand interactions. Importantly, the elevated temperatures during fever is likely to alter multiple molecular pathways required for the survival of malaria parasites21.
Here we study the effect of a transient exposure to febrile temperatures on the cell-cell adhesion strength via a dual-pipette step-pressure technique. We first measured the binding strength and the percentage of binding between PfEMP1 and CSA bearing Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO-CSA) cells and compared our observations with previously published results regarding the interactions between PfEMP1 and other host receptors. Further, we evaluated the effect of febrile temperature on iRBCs adhesion, which revealed significant increase in iRBC adhesion to target cells. Moreover, a transient exposure to febrile temperatures increased the expression of phosphatidylsesrine (PS) on iRBC surface. Using soluble Annexin V, we specifically blocked PS expression on iRBC surface, which subsequently resulted in a remarkable reduction in the iRBCs’ adhesion forces to CHO-CSA cells.
Materials and Methods
Culture and maintenance of adhesive malaria parasites
Plasmodium falciparum strain FCR3CSA was used in this study. Parasites were maintained in human RBCs supplemented with human serum (0.5% wt/vol) in HEPES-buffered RPMI media (malaria culture medium), supplemented with hypoxanthine (50μg mL−1), NaHCO3 (25 mM), gentamicin (2.5μg mL−1). Continuous culture methods were followed as described in previous studies22. Parasites were synchronized by treatment with 5% D-sorbitol (Sigma) to select ring-stage infections, and adhesive parasites of trophozoite stage were selected periodically using CHO-CSA cells. Fresh malaria culture medium was added with 5% hematocrit for continuous culture.
Culture of CHO cells
CHO-CSA (CHO-K1:ATCC CCL-61) were cultured in CHO cell culture medium of 90% F-12K Medium (with L-Glutamine, ATCC), 9% Fetal Bovine Serum (Origin: USDA, PAA, de-activated), and 1% pen-streptomycin. Sub-culture was performed every two days at 80% confluence. For sub-culture, cells were incubated in 5 ml Accutase Cell Detachment Solution (Innovative Cell Technologies, Inc.) at 37 °C for 10 min. The detached CHO cells were then washed three times by centrifugation (1500 rpm, 5 min) in RPMI-1640. The supernatant was removed and cells were resuspended in 5 ml culture medium at 2 × 104 cells/ml. CHO-CSA cells were not used beyond 25 passages.
Febrile temperature incubation and adhesive sample preparation
Trophozoite stage parasites (30–32 hours post-infection) were resuspended in malaria culture medium and incubated in a water bath pre-set at 40 °C for a period of 1 h. Cells were then washed in RPMI-1640 and resuspended in PBS with 500 μg/ml BSA at 5 × 105 cells/ml. Another aliquot of the same parasite culture incubated at 37 °C served as control.
CHO-CSA cells were detached using 5 ml of Accutase Cell Detachment Solution (Innovative Cell technologies, Inc.) for a T25 flask and washed twice in RPMI-1640. CHO-CSA cells were then resuspended at 105 cells/ml in PBS with 500 μg/ml BSA together with iRBCs that were differentially exposed to febrile condition.
Dual pipette assay and step-pressure technique
The cell-cell adhesion force between the iRBCs and CHO-CSA cells was measured using the dual-pipette assay and step-pressure technique18,20,23. To fabricate the micropipettes, borosilicate glass tubings (B100-75-10, Sutter) were pulled using Sutter Micropipette Puller (Sutter Instruments) and forged by Narishige Microforge (MF900, Narishige). Micropipettes with inner diameter (ID) of 5 to 10 μm were used to hold the CHO-CSA cells. Smaller micropipettes of 1 to 2 μm were fabricated to manipulate the iRBCs and to measure the adhesion force.
The mixture of treated iRBCs and CHO-CSA cells was loaded into a cell mounting chamber made of two coverslips and parafilm separate gasket. A CHO-CSA cell was held by a larger micropipette (ID of 5 to 10 μm) as the adhesive target. An iRBC was then held and manipulated by a smaller micropipette (ID of 1 to 2 μm). The aspiration pressure exerted by the micropipettes could be adjusted by the height of the externally connected water column. The iRBCs were kept in touch with the target cells for 30 s to allow a stable cell-cell adhesion. The adherent iRBCs were then removed by the micropipette at increasing pressure (Fig. 1(B)). The suction pressure to separate the two cells was measured by a pressure transducer (P55, Validyne Engineering). Optical images were viewed using a 100× oil objective with DIC and captured by Olympus QColor5 High Resolution Color CCD Digital FireWire Camera. Images were processed by QCapture Pro 6.0.
Force measurements were conducted at 37 ± 0.5 °C. A heating plate (Linkam Scientific Instruments, UK) and an objective heater (Tokai Hit, Japan) were used to maintain the temperature within the required range. A thermocouple thermometer was used to continuously monitor the testing medium temperature.
Calculation of Adhesion Force
The aspiration pressure ΔP to separate the two cells was recorded, and the adhesion force was calculated as,
1 |
where F is the adhesion force, ΔP is the negative aspirating pressure provided by the micropipettes, and DP is the inner diameter of the micropipette (Fig. 1(A)). As the lowest negative pressure to be applied was 7.848 pa using the step-pressure technique, the threshold force measurement was calculated as 14 pN if a 1.5 µm micropipette was used.
Calculation of the adhesion energy density
The adhesion energy density wa is defined as the energy to separate a unit contact area. The Young equation was used to calculate the adhesion energy density of the cell-cell adhesion interface24–28,
2 |
where Tm is the membrane tension close to the contact rim, and θm is the angle between the CHO cell membrane and the horizontal (Fig. 1(A)). The membrane tension Tm was calculated as,
3 |
where F is the adhesion force, D is the cell-cell contact diameter, and θP is the angle between the iRBC membrane and the vertical (Fig. 1(A)).
In most cases θm is close to 90°, and the adhesion energy density is close to Tm.
PfEMP1 expression
The staining of iRBCs for PfEMP1 expression levels followed the protocol as described previously29. After incubating at 40 °C, trophozoite stage parasites were washed in RPMI-1640 and resuspended in PBS with 500 μg/ml BSA at 106 cells/ml. This sample was then incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) against VAR2CSA PfEMP1 cysteine-rich interdomain region for 30 min at 4 °C. After centrifugal separation, the iRBCs were washed and incubated with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Invitrogen) for 30 min. SYTO16 (Invitrogen) was used to stain the DNA contents of iRBCs. Parasites were then fixed in 4% freshly prepared paraformaldehyde for flow cytometry analysis. A control group maintained at 37 °C was also included in all experiments. The immunofluorescent intensity (MFI) of Alexa Fluor 488 was measured by flow cytometry.
PS expression
The staining of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the iRBC membrane followed the protocol described in the previous study17. Annexin V:FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen) was used to monitor the PS expression on the iRBC surface. After incubating at 40 °C, iRBCs were washed in PBS with 500 μg/mL BSA and resuspended in 1× Annexin V Binding Buffer (BD Pharmingen) at 1 × 106 cells/ml. Infected RBCs were incubated at room temperature for 15 min with FITC Annexin V diluted 1/100 together with Dihydroethidium, HE (Invitrogen) diluted 1/100. After washing with PBS that contains 500 μg/ml BSA, PS expression was examined using flow cytometry (wavelength: 488 nm). A group of iRBCs that were maintained at 37 °C served as controls.
PfEMP1 and PS inhibition assay
Soluble CSA (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to block the adhesion mediated by PfEMP1. After incubating at 40 °C for 1 h, parasites were washed in RPMI-1640 and resuspended in PBS with 100 μg/ml CSA and 400 μg/ml BSA at 5 × 105 cells/ml. A control group was prepared by re-suspending parasites in PBS with 500 μg/ml BSA.
The adhesion mediated by PS was inhibited by Annexin V (BD Pharmingen). After the febrile temperature incubation, iRBCs were washed in RPMI-1640 and resuspended in freshly prepared PS inhibition medium (450 μg/ml BSA and 50 μg/ml Annexin V in PBS with Ca2+) at 5 × 105 cells/ml. A control group was prepared by re-suspending iRBCs in PBS with 500 μg/ml BSA.
To block the adhesion mediated by both PS and PfEMP1, iRBCs were washed and re-suspended in PBS with 350 μg/ml BSA, 50 μg/ml Annexin V and 100 μg/ml CSA at 5 × 105 cells/ml. A control group was prepared by resuspending iRBCs in PBS with 500 μg/ml BSA.
Statistical Analysis
Scatter dot plots with median value of each group were used for data presentation. Statistical significance and non-Gaussian distribution were determined by the Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance with Dunns post hoc test and Mann-Whitney test respectively.
Results
Exposure to Febrile temperature significantly increases iRBC adhesion to Chondroitin Suphate A expressing CHO cells
To study the effect of febrile temperature on adhesion, iRBCs were subjected to 1 h incubation at 40 °C before conducting the dual-pipette adhesion experiments. Trophozoite stage parasites are susceptible to febrile temperatures. Longer incubations (of more than 2 h) may lead to parasite death21. Thus, 2 h incubation were used to study the fever temperature effect on live iRBCs adhesion. The adhesion measurements were performed at 37 °C after the incubation of iRBCs at 40 °C. Five independent experiments of force measurement were conducted as part of this analysis. In total, 181 iRBCs after 1 h febrile temperature incubation were measured. In addition, 75 iRBCs incubated at room temperature (23 °C), and 223 iRBCs incubated at 37 °C were measured as control groups. All measurements were done within 1 h of treatment to avoid artefactual effects arising from liquid evaporation etc. under the conditions of measurements. Moreover, experiments were repeated to obtain reliable measurements from sufficient number of cells. The percentage of adhesion was then calculated by dividing the number of adherent iRBCs to the total number of cells tested. Figure 2(A) shows the percentage of adhesion of each group.
At room temperature (23 °C), 58.9% iRBCs adhered to the CHO-CSA cells. At 37 °C, the percentage of adhesion was 58.4%. There is no significant difference between these two groups. However, after 1 h incubation at 40 °C, the percentage of adhesion increased significantly to 85.6% (p < 0.0001).
We used the dual-pipette step-pressure to quantify the cell-cell adhesion force between the iRBCs and CHO-CSA cells. Figure 2(B) shows the adhesion force measured at 23 °C, 37 °C and after 1 h febrile temperature incubation. At 23 °C, the adhesion force was 148.1 ± 84.2 pN, which slightly decreased to 139.1 ± 85.6 pN at 37 °C (p > 0.05). Strikingly, we observed a significant rise in the adhesion force to 196 ± 105 pN (p < 0.0001) after 1 h incubation at 40 °C.
Febrile temperature incubation enables a larger contact diameter between the two cells
If the iRBC detachment is considered as a peeling process (process of reducing contact area), the resultant adhesion force is proportional to the contact diameter and the adhesion energy density according to the Young equation. In turn, the contact diameter is proportional to the receptor-ligand density, the bond strength, and the cell membrane property. Furthermore, the adhesion energy density quantifies the unit strength of an adhesive interface, which is proportional to both the bond density and the strength of a single bond25,26,30,31. Since 1 h incubation at 40 °C significantly increases the cell-cell adhesion force, we studied the effect of febrile incubation on contact diameter and adhesion energy density.
Figure 1(B) shows the procedure of one iRBC being detached from the CHO cell by the continuous increasing aspiration force. The contact diameter was directly measured from the optical microscopy images with resolution down to 200 nm. Figure 1(C) shows the contact diameter corresponding to different aspirating pressures. With a pressure increase from 40 Pa to 100 Pa, there was only a 20% reduction in the contact diameter. When the aspirating force reached the threshold pressure, the two cells detached completely. The percentage of adhesion (Fig. 2(A) was calculated by dividing the number of adherent iRBCs to the total number of cells tested. Figure 2(B) shows the percentage of adhesion of each group tested.
To quantify the iRBC spreading ability on the CHO-CSA cell, the initial contact diameters were measured and compared among the three temperature groups. Figure 2(C) shows the initial contact diameter measured at 23 °C, 37 °C and after 1 h incubation at 40 °C, respectively. The initial contact diameter that was formed at 23 °C was 1.6 ± 1.2 µm and 1.9 ± 1.24 µm at 37 °C with no significant difference between these two groups (p > 0.05). However, after 1 h incubation at 40 °C, there was a significant increase to 2.49 ± 0.97 µm (p < 0.0001) in contact diameter. We then measured the final contact diameter just before the iRBC was completely separated from the CHO-CSA cell. Figure 2(D) shows the final contact diameter prior to detachment measured at 23 °C, 37 °C and after 1 h incubation at 40 °C were 1.34 ± 0.73 µm, 1.25 ± 0.92 µm and 1.8 ± 0.8 μm, respectively. The latter was significantly larger than the value measured at both 23 °C and 37 °C.
The adhesion energy density is defined as the energy to remove a unit contact area of the cell-cell adhesion25,27. It was calculated using the Young equation (Eqn. (2)). At 23 °C, the adhesion energy density measured was 35.85 ± 29.52 μJ/m2, while at 37 °C, it was 49.05 ± 36.7 μJ/m2. After 1 h incubation at 40 °C, it was 43.88 ± 36.49 μJ/m2, which showed an apparent lack of change (p > 0.05) among the three groups, as shown in Figure S1.
Febrile temperature increases the expression of Phosphatidylserine (PS) on the iRBC surface, but PfEMP1 expression remains unchanged
Febrile temperature is known to alter several molecular pathways in iRBCs21. Moreover, previous studies have shown that febrile temperature changed the asymmetry of phospholipids on the RBC membrane lipid bilayer and subsequently increased the exposure of PS from the inner-leaflet16,17. However, at trophozoite and schizont stage, the expression of PfEMP1 did not change with febrile temperature incubation21,32,33. We used flow cytometry to evaluate any changes in PS and PfEMP1 expression on magnet- isolated iRBCs (with ~ 80% purity) incubated at febrile temperature using annexin V and antisera against PfEMP1, respectively (Fig. 3(A–D)). The mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) was measured before and after the fever temperature incubation (Fig. 3(E)). After one-hour incubation at 40 °C, the MFI value of PS increased from 54.67 ± 2.51 to 81.23 ± 5.88. However, one-hour incubation resulted in no significant changes in the MFI of PfEMP1 (37.12 at 37 °C, and 38.22 after 1 h incubation at 40 °C)33. A previous study indicates that an extended 24 h-incubation at 40 °C can enhance the PS expression of normal RBCs (nRBCs) significantly16. In our experiments (with 2 h incubation), we did not observe any changes of the PS expression on nRBCs upon febrile temperature exposure.
The increased iRBC adhesion is likely due to the additional negative charges rendered by elevated surface expression of PS
Our results show a significant increase in the adhesion force between iRBCs and CHO-CSA cells upon one-hour incubation at 40 °C. It appeared that the elevated adhesion force arose primarily from the formation of a larger cell-cell contact diameter. However, the adhesion energy density was similar prior to and after incubation at febrile temperature. PfEMP1 and PS are both potential adhesive ligands as reported in previous literature, and the incubation at febrile temperature significantly increased PS expression. Hence, to examine the roles of each adhesive ligand in the increased resultant adhesion force, specific inhibition assay was performed. The adhesion mediated by PfEMP1 was blocked by using soluble CSA, and Annexin V was added to inhibit the adhesion mediated by PS. The adhesion force and percentage were measured after CSA and Annexin V were added.
Figure 4(A) shows the percentage of adhesion after the iRBCs being inhibited by CSA and Annexin V. Based on prior literature34–36, we used soluble CSA as the adhesion inhibitor in the assay. At 37 °C, soluble CSA reduced the adhesion percentage from 58.4% to 8% while Annexin V reduced the adhesion percentage to 40%. After one-hour incubation at 40 °C, 85.6% iRBCs adhered to CHO cells. With the addition of CSA, the adhesion percentage was reduced to 31.3%, and Annexin V reduced the adhesion percentage to 37.2%. When CSA and Annexin V were combined, adhesion was totally reduced by about 10% in infected RBCs, but remained unchanged in healthy controls.
To examine the adhesion force mediated solely by PfEMP1, Annexin V was added, which specifically blocks any adhesion mediated by PS. The adhesion force was compared with the control group. Figure 4(B,C) show the adhesion force measured with the addition of Annexin V. After one-hour incubation at 40 °C, the adhesion force increased significantly from 113.7 ± 77.43 pN to 159.9 ± 96.33 pN (p < 0.005). However, with the addition of Annexin V, the adhesion force was 102 ± 53.92 pN measured at 37 °C, and it was 108.63 ± 50.45 pN after 1 h incubation. The adhesion force did not change significantly (p > 0.05). We also tried to measure the iRBCs adhesion force mediated by PS only. However, with the addition of soluble CSA blocking CSA-specific bindings, the adhesion force mediated by PS was too weak (below 14 pN) to be measured by the dual-pipette technique.
Discussion
Cyto-adhesion of iRBCs has important clinical significance during the course of malaria infection, but the impact of recurring fever on iRBCs adherent properties has not been thoroughly studied. Upon parasite maturation, the release of merozoites, metabolic intermediates and other toxic molecules stimulate the production of pyrogenic inflammatory mediators and cytokines. Subsequently, these cytokines send signals to the brain to elevate the core body temperature21,37–40. Hence, in a synchronized iRBC population, the fever that starts with iRBC rupture only affects the ring stage parasites. However, in acute falciparum malaria infections, asynchronous or even bimodal distributed parasites exist in patients41–45. Thus, elevated body temperature caused by the fever could also affect adhering trophozoites and fully developed schizonts. A short period of exposure to febrile temperature significantly induces more iRBCs to adhere to endothelial receptors, including the normally non-adhesive ring stage iRBCs32,33. A brief febrile incubation accelerates the expression of PfEMP1, and the appearance of PfEMP1 at ring stage enhances fever-induced ring stage adhesion. However, at trophozoite stage, the PfEMP1 expression was not altered21,32. Thus, the possibilities of other proteins involved in fever-induced adhesion are not ruled out.
Here we used the dual-pipette step-pressure technique to quantify the stable cell-cell adhesion of P. falciparum iRBCs and CHO cells expressing CSA (VAR2CSA). CSA is one of the major ligands for placental adhesion of human plasmodia, and it could be the basis for a vaccine against pregnancy malaria46. Thus, we used the parasite line that has been selected for CSA binding, and the CHO cells as surrogates to the human host cells. Overall, our results demonstrated a two-fold increase in the adhesion force as well as a larger cell-cell contact area formation between trophozoite stage iRBCs and target CHO-CSA cells at elevated temperature. Correspondingly, the adhesion percentage increased as well. Moreover, we identified that the increased adhesion was derived from an increased exposure of PS on the iRBC surface under thermally stressed condition. The expression level of PfEMP1 remained unchanged, as determined by FACS. PS is a negatively charged phospholipid, and any altered exposure of PS changes the cell membrane charge balance rendering a more adhesive cell surface14,47. Specifically, PS can bind to several host receptors including TSP and CD36, and it is one of the non-specific adhesive ligands involved in malarial cytoadherence as well as sickle cell disease9,11,14,15. Recent studies suggested that at febrile temperature, the lipid bilayer loses its phospholipids asymmetry and as a result, the PS components flip to the membrane outer layer16,17. Thus, during febrile temperature, increased surface expression of PS significantly enhanced the cell-cell adhesion strength and allowed more iRBCs adhering to endothelial cell receptors. Our quantitative measurements showed that a 50% increase in the adhesion force could be brought by the increased PS exposure at febrile temperature for iRBCs. Point contacts were observed between healthy RBCs to CHO cells after febrile temperature incubation, but the adhesion force was below the threshold of the dual pipette step-pressure technique (below 14 pN). The point contacts were inhibited by the addition of Annexin V (Fig. S2). A significant PS expression in normal RBCs is expected only upon prolonged febrile incubation16.
The cell-cell adhesion of receptor-ligand interactions is dominated by several factors. Here we used the “fracture energy density” approach25,26 to describe the adhesion process. In this approach, the Young equation (Eqn. (2)) indicates that the resultant cell-cell adhesion force is proportional to the contact diameter and the adhesion energy density. Being exposed to febrile temperature greatly enhanced the PS expression; therefore, larger contacts were formed between two infected cells. The adhesion energy density is defined as the energy to separate a unit contact25–27,48, and it is proportional to both the adhesive ligand density and the strength to break a single receptor-ligand pair25,31. While the febrile temperature incubation enhanced the non-specific adhesive ligand (PS) expression, it did not change the adhesion energy density significantly. Similar to what we observed in the present study (Fig. 4(A)), increased binding frequency between iRBCs and CHO-CSA cells was found by atomic force microscopy (AFM) at febrile temperature in our recent study33. Considering the small (~20%) drop in specific CSA-PfEMP1 single receptor-ligand pair binding force33, it appears that increased non-specific ligand (PS) expression balanced the weakened single and multiple CSA-PfEMP1 bindings with no changes in PfEMP1 expression after febrile temperature incubation. Thus, the overall adhesion energy density did not change significantly. Nevertheless, much stronger overall adhesion force between the two cells was observed with the increased PS expression. The dual-pipette cell-cell adhesion assay is ideal for capturing the overall adhesion rupture force between two cells, which can be used to give a more complete picture together with the specific single receptor-ligand rupture force measurements.
Recent in vitro studies have suggested that the fever episodes contribute to increased parasite clearance and thus it is protective to the human host. Parasites exposed to high fever proceeds to an apoptosis-like progressive cell death pathway21. With their surface exposed to PS, these iRBCs are ready to be recognized and cleared by phagocytes in spleen49–52. Hence, malaria-associated fever is considered beneficial to the patients suffering from the disease. Some but not all studies have shown that antipyretic drugs, with their ability of alleviating fever, extend the parasites clearance time53,54. Although longer exposure to febrile temperature (>2 h) leads to parasites death, we demonstrate that a short exposure (<1 h) in fact significantly enhanced the iRBCs adherence via PS. Increased surface expression of PS could possibly contribute to the parasite clearance through apoptosis-like pathway. In addition, the stronger adhesion force can facilitate parasites sequestration and help them escape mechanical barriers associated with splenic clearance. As a result, it supports long-term parasite survival and at the same time keeps low levels of infection. Although these in vitro studies provide direct evidence to the effect of febrile temperature on cytoadherence by malaria-iRBCs, adhesion measurements were performed in static environment. Further experiments using dynamic modes of measurements and the use of in vivo model systems will strengthen the current understanding of the relationship between febrile temperature and malaria cytoadhesion.
Conclusion
Here, we report a link between febrile temperature, PS expression and the elevated adhesive properties of malaria-iRBCs. Our results demonstrate that a short exposure to febrile temperature significantly increases both the adhesion force and adhesion percentage between iRBCs and CSA-CHO cells, which might be related to clinical manifestations relevant to malaria-associated fever.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Advanced Materials for Micro- and Nano- systems program of the Singapore-MIT Alliance (SMA) Fellowship, the Infectious Diseases Interdisciplinary Research Group of the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART) and the Global Enterprise for Micro-Mechanics and Molecular Medicine (GEM4). The authors thank Dr. J. Smith (SBRI, Seattle, Washington, USA) for kindly providing FCR3CSA parasites and Dr. Monica-Diez Silva for discussions. Rajesh Chandramohanadas acknowledges T1MOE1506 for funding support. Technical assistance of Ms. Hu Yang is greatly C.T. Lim acknowledged support provided by the Biomedical Institute for Global Health Research and Technology as well as the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Research Centre for Excellence, Mechanobiology Institute at the National University of Singapore.
Author Contributions
R.Z.: Involved in study design, conducted experiments and assisted in manuscript preparation; R.C.: Involved in study design, provided tools for research and assisted in manuscript preparation; C.T.L.: Designed research, verified results and wrote the manuscript. M.D.: Designed research, verified results and wrote the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Rajesh Chandramohanadas, Email: rajesh@sutd.edu.sg.
Chwee Teck Lim, Email: ctlim@nus.edu.sg.
Ming Dao, Email: mingdao@mit.edu.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-33358-2.
References
- 1.Organization WH, World malaria report 2017. World Health Organization (2017).
- 2.Glenister FK, Coppel RL, Cowman AF, Mohandas N, Cooke BM. Contribution of parasite proteins to altered mechanical properties of malaria-infected red blood cells. Blood. 2002;99:1060–1063. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.3.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Engwerda CR, Beattie L, Amante FH. The importance of the spleen in malaria. Trends in parasitology. 2005;21:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kraemer SM, Smith JD. A family affair: var genes, PfEMP1 binding, and malaria disease. Current opinion in microbiology. 2006;9:374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mills J. P., Diez-Silva M., Quinn D. J., Dao M., Lang M. J., Tan K. S. W., Lim C. T., Milon G., David P. H., Mercereau-Puijalon O., Bonnefoy S., Suresh S. Effect of plasmodial RESA protein on deformability of human red blood cells harboring Plasmodium falciparum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(22):9213–9217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703433104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Park Y, et al. Refractive index maps and membrane dynamics of human red blood cells parasitized by Plasmodium falciparum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105:13730–13735. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806100105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Flick K, Chen Q. Var genes, PfEMP1 and the human host. Molecular and biochemical parasitology. 2004;134:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2003.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pasternak ND, Dzikowski R. PfEMP1: An antigen that plays a key role in the pathogenicity and immune evasion of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology. 2009;41:1463–1466. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Manodori AB, Barabino GA, Lubin BH, Kuypers FA. Adherence of phosphatidylserine-exposing erythrocytes to endothelial matrix thrombospondin. Blood. 2000;95:1293–1300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pouvelle B, Buffet PA, Lepolard C, Scherf A, Gysin J. Cytoadhesion of Plasmodium falciparum ring-stage-infected erythrocytes. Nature medicine. 2000;6:1264–1268. doi: 10.1038/81374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sherman IW, Eda S, Winograd E. Cytoadherence and sequestration in Plasmodium falciparum: defining the ties that bind. Microbes and Infection. 2003;5:897–909. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(03)00162-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bultrini E, et al. Revisiting the Plasmodium falciparum RIFIN family: from comparative genomics to 3D-model prediction. BMC genomics. 2009;10:445. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Niang M, Yam XY, Preiser PR. The Plasmodium falciparum STEVOR multigene family mediates antigenic variation of the infected erythrocyte. PLoS pathogens. 2009;5:e1000307. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bonomini M, et al. Enhanced adherence of human uremic erythrocytes to vascular endothelium: role of phosphatidylserine exposure. Kidney international. 2002;62:1358–1363. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2002.kid560.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eda S, Sherman IW. Cytoadherence of malaria-infected red blood cells involves exposure of phosphatidylserine. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2002;12:373–384. doi: 10.1159/000067908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Föller Michael, Braun Manuel, Qadri Syed M., Lang Elisabeth, Mahmud Hasan, Lang Florian. Temperature sensitivity of suicidal erythrocyte death. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2010;40(6):534–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02296.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pattanapanyasat K, et al. Febrile temperature but not proinflammatory cytokines promotes phosphatidylserine expression on Plasmodium falciparum malaria‐infected red blood cells during parasite maturation. Cytometry Part A. 2010;77:515–523. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nash GBG, Cooke BBM, Carlson J, Wahlgren M. Rheological properties of rosettes formed by red blood cells parasitized by Plasmodium falciparum. British journal of haematology. 1992;82:757–763. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb06955.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li A, et al. Molecular mechanistic insights into the endothelial receptor mediated cytoadherence of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. PLoS one. 2011;6:e16929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nash GB, et al. Rheological analysis of the adhesive interactions of red blood cells parasitized by Plasmodium falciparum. Blood. 1992;79:798–807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Oakley MSM, et al. Molecular factors and biochemical pathways induced by febrile temperature in intraerythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Infection and immunity. 2007;75:2012–2025. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01236-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ljungström, I., Moll, K. & Perlmann, H. (2008) Methods in malaria research. Available:http://www.mr4. org/Portals/3/Pdfs/ProtocolBook/Methods_in_Malaria_Research.pdf. Accessed 23 January2014.
- 23.Vedula SRK, et al. Quantifying forces mediated by integral tight junction proteins in cell–cell adhesion. Experimental mechanics. 2009;49:3–9. doi: 10.1007/s11340-007-9113-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Evans E, Buxbaum K. Affinity of red blood cell membrane for particle surfaces measured by the extent of particle encapsulation. Biophysical journal. 1981;34:1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84834-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Evans E, Leung A. Adhesivity and rigidity of erythrocyte membrane in relation to wheat germ agglutinin binding. The Journal of cell biology. 1984;98:1201–1208. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.4.1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Evans E, Berk D, Leung A, Mohandas N. Detachment of agglutinin-bonded red blood cells. II. Mechanical energies to separate large contact areas. Biophysical journal. 1991;59:849–860. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82297-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brochard-Wyart F, De Gennes P-G. Unbinding of adhesive vesicles. Comptes Rendus Physique. 2003;4:281–287. doi: 10.1016/S1631-0705(03)00048-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Evans E, Leung A, Heinrich V, Zhu C. Mechanical switching and coupling between two dissociation pathways in a P-selectin adhesion bond. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004;101:11281–11286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401870101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bengtsson D, et al. A method for visualizing surface-exposed and internal PfEMP1 adhesion antigens in Plasmodium falciparum infected erythrocytes. Malaria journal. 2008;7:101. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kuo SC, Lauffenburger DA. Relationship between receptor/ligand binding affinity and adhesion strength. Biophysical journal. 1993;65:2191–2200. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81277-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Evans EA. Detailed mechanics of membrane-membrane adhesion and separation. I. Continuum of molecular cross-bridges. Biophysical journal. 1985;48:175–183. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83770-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Udomsangpetch R, et al. Febrile temperatures induce cytoadherence of ring-stage Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99:11825–11829. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172398999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Carvalho, P. A., Diez–Silva, M., Chen, H., Dao, M. & Suresh S. Cytoadherence of erythrocytes invaded by Plasmodium falciparum: Quantitative contact–probing of a human malaria receptor. Acta biomaterialia (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Andrews KT, Adams Y, Viebig NK, Lanzer M, Schwartz-Albiez R. Adherence of Plasmodium falciparum infected erythrocytes to CHO-745 cells and inhibition of binding by protein A in the presence of human serum. International journal for parasitology. 2005;35:1127–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Andrews KT, Klatt N, Adams Y, Mischnick P, Schwartz-Albiez R. Inhibition of chondroitin-4-sulfate-specific adhesion of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes by sulfated polysaccharides. Infection and immunity. 2005;73(7):4288–94. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.7.4288-4294.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fusai T, et al. Characterisation of the chondroitin sulphate of Saimiri brain microvascular endothelial cells involved in Plasmodium falciparum cytoadhesion. Molecular and biochemical parasitology. 2000;108:25–37. doi: 10.1016/S0166-6851(00)00199-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kwiatkowski D. Tumour necrosis factor, fever and fatality in falciparum malaria. Immunology letters. 1990;25:213–216. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(90)90117-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miller LH, Baruch DI, Marsh K, Doumbo OK. The pathogenic basis of malaria. Nature. 2002;415:673–679. doi: 10.1038/415673a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.McKenzie FE, Jeffery GM, Collins WE. Gametocytemia and fever in human malaria infections. Journal of Parasitology. 2007;93:627–633. doi: 10.1645/GE-1052R.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Oakley MS, Gerald N, McCutchan TF, Aravind L, Kumar S. Clinical and molecular aspects of malaria fever. Trends in parasitology. 2011;27:442–449. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Robert F, et al. Extensive genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum isolates collected from patients with severe malaria in Dakar, Senegal. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1996;90:704–711. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(96)90446-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Beck H-P, et al. Analysis of multiple Plasmodium falciparum infections in Tanzanian children during the phase III trial of the malaria vaccine SPf66. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1997;175:921–926. doi: 10.1086/513991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Konaté L, et al. Variation of Plasmodium falciparum msp1 block 2 and msp2 allele prevalence and of infection complexity in two neighbouring Senegalese villages with different transmission conditions. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1999;93:21–28. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90323-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bendixen M, Msangeni HA, Pedersen BV, Shayo D, Bedker R. Diversity of Plasmodium falciparum populations and complexity of infections in relation to transmission intensity and host age: a study from the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2001;95:143–148. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90140-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schleiermacher D, et al. Hidden Plasmodium falciparum parasites in human infections: different genotype distribution in the peripheral circulation and in the placenta. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2002;2:97–105. doi: 10.1016/S1567-1348(02)00085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yosaatmadja F, et al. Characterization of VAR2CSA-deficient Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes selected for adhesion to the BeWo placental cell line. Malaria journal. 2008;7:51. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Boas FE, Forman L, Beutler E. Phosphatidylserine exposure and red cell viability in red cell aging and in hemolytic anemia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95:3077–3081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Evans EA. Analysis of adhesion of large vesicles to surfaces. Biophysical journal. 1980;31:425–431. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(80)85069-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lang PAP, et al. Accelerated clearance of Plasmodium-infected erythrocytes in sickle cell trait and annexin-A7 deficiency. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2009;24:415–428. doi: 10.1159/000257529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Turrini F, et al. Phagocytosis of Plasmodium falciparum-infected human red blood cells by human monocytes: involvement of immune and nonimmune determinants and dependence on parasite developmental stage. Blood. 1992;80:801–808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tanaka Y, Schroit A. Insertion of fluorescent phosphatidylserine into the plasma membrane of red blood cells. Recognition by autologous macrophages. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1983;25–258(18):11335–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schroit AJ, Madsen JW, Tanaka Y. In vivo recognition and clearance of red blood cells containing phosphatidylserine in their plasma membranes. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1985;260:5131–5138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Brandts CH, Ndjavé M, Graninger W, Kremsner PPG, Ndjave M. Effect of paracetamol on parasite clearance time in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The Lancet. 1997;350:704–709. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02255-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Meremikwu MM, Odigwe CC, Akudo Nwagbara B, Udoh EE. Antipyretic measures for treating fever in malaria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12(9):CD002151. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002151.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.