Abstract
Mast cells are prominent components of solid tumors and exhibit distinct phenotypes in different tumor microenvironments. However, their precise mechanism of communication in gastric cancer remains largely unclear. Here, we found that patients with GC showed a significantly higher mast cell infiltration in tumors. Mast cell levels increased with tumor progression and independently predicted reduced overall survival. Tumor-derived adrenomedullin (ADM) induced mast cell degranulation via PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, which effectively promoted the proliferation and inhibited the apoptosis of GC cells in vitro and contributed to the growth and progression of GC tumors in vivo, and the effect could be reversed by blocking interleukin (IL)-17A production from these mast cells. Our results illuminate a novel protumorigenic role and associated mechanism of mast cells in GC, and also provide functional evidence for these mast cells to prevent, and to treat this immunopathogenesis feature of GC.
Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) is a severe health problem, being the fourth most common malignancies and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide1. Despite significant advances in prevention, diagnose, and therapeutic options and strategies in these years, many unanswered questions remain, particularly the pathogenesis of GC is not elaborated clearly. Nowadays, It is generally accepted that the development and prognosis of GC is influenced by tumor and host immune system cross-talk2,3, with some studies supporting a crucial role for adaptive immunity in determining the clinical outcomes of GC patients4–6. However, the role of innate immunity and innate immune cell is little known during GC progression.
Mast cells are a group of innate immune cells with profound immune-regulatory effects on tumor progression7, such as angiogenesis8, interaction with other immune cells and remodeling tumor microenvironment9,10. Currently, some researches performed on mast cells in GC and these limited studies are mostly focused on the correlation between GC survival rate and their mast cell infiltration by immunohistochemistry11, and some on the relationships between the density of the infiltrating mast cells and local angiogenesis12,13. Overall, these studies suggested that mast cells might be promising therapeutic targets for GC. However, the presence of tumor-associated mast cells, as well as their precise mechanisms of communication in gastric cancer remains largely unclear.
Adrenomedullin (ADM) is a 52-amino acid peptide amide, which had been discovered from a human pheochromocytoma14. It plays a powerful role in human carcinogenesis through diverse mechanisms15. Recent studies has shown that elevated ADM expression in cancer cells can augment angiogenesis, reduce apoptosis, and even promote tumor proliferation16,17. In addition to its known tumorigenic abilities, ADM has been shown to regulate certain aspects of the immune function that include modulating mast cell activation18, which potentially involved with tumor promotion and progression.
Herein, we investigated the interplays among mast cells, ADM and tumor cells in the GC microenvironment. We show that mast cells are highly infiltrated in GC, and tumor-derived ADM activates mast cell degranulation via PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. In turn, activated mast cells release interleukin (IL)-17A, which can promote tumor cell proliferation and suppress its apoptosis in vitro. Besides, blocking mast cells degranulation and associated-IL-17A can inhibit tumor growth and GC progression in vivo. Our data confirm a protumorigenic role of mast cells in GC. These tumor-infiltrating mast cells increase with tumor progression and are negatively correlated with patient survival after surgery, suggesting that mast cells may be a novel target to improve GC therapy.
Results
Mast cells are enriched in GC as tumor progress and independently predict poor patient survival
To evaluate the potential role of mast cells in human GC, we analyzed the infiltration of mast cell from intratumoral, marginal, peritumoral, and non-tumor tissues of GC patients at various stages by Immunohistochemistry. Notably, patients with GC showed a higher mast cell infiltration in intratumoral tissues than marginal, peritumoral, and non-tumor tissues (Fig. 1a). Moreover, as the cancer progressed, the accumulation of intratumoral mast cells increased significantly (Fig. 1b). This intratumoral mast cell accumulation was most notable from stage II onwards (Fig. 1c), indicating a potential role for mast cells in the GC microenvironment. In keeping with this finding, increased mast cell per field was correlated with increased advanced tumor size (Fig. 1d).
Next, we evaluated the clinical relevance of intratumoral mast cells in GC. Comparing patients with high (≥47/per field median level) versus low (<47/ per field) mast cell per field number, the 62-month overall survival rates were significantly lower for those within the higher per field number (Fig. 1e). And the disease-free survival rates were similar to overall survival rates (Fig. 1f). Taken together, these findings suggest that increased intratumoral mast cells are associated with tumor progression and poor survival of GC patients.
TTCS can stimulate mast cell activation and degranulation via PI3K-AKT signaling pathway
Degranulation is an important biological activity for mast cells. To see whether the tumor microenvironment might play an important role in this process, we stimulated mast cells with TTCS, and found that, compared to NTCS, TTCS significantly induced mast cell degranulation (Fig. 2a). As a positive control for stimulating mast cell degranulation, Compound 48/80 appeared here. To reveal which signaling pathways might operate in the degranulation of mast cells, we first pretreated mast cells with corresponding inhibitors including AG490 (a JAK inhibitor), BAY 11-7082 (an IκBα inhibitor), SP600125 (a JNK inhibitor), SB203580 (a MAPK inhibitor), U0126 (MEK-1 and MEK-2 inhibitor), or Wortmannin (a PI3K inhibitor), and then exposed them to the indicated TTCS. The results showed that only blocking the signal transduction of PI3K with Wortmannin effectively suppressed the degranulation of mast cells (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, AKT, direct PI3K-AKT pathway downstream substrate, was predominantly phosphorylated in mast cells after treatment with TTCS in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2c). Interestingly, with the increased concentration of TTCS, the phosphorylation level of AKT was up-regulated in mast cells (Fig. 2d). These results above indicate that, in the GC microenvironment, mast cells can be activated and lead to degranulation via PI3K-AKT signaling pathway.
The degranulation of mast cell can be regulated by tumor-derived factor ADM in GC
Tumor microenvironment can possess various soluble factors, including pro-inflammatory molecules. To see which molecules might have effects on mast cells, we first screened pro-inflammatory molecules in human GC microenvironments by microarray (Fig. 3a), and stimulated mast cells with highly-expressed molecules including GM-CSF, M-CSF, G-CSF, IFN-γ, ADM, TGF-β, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-22, etc. We found that only ADM remarkably induced mast cell degranulation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3b, c). Next, we found that ADM in tumor tissues was significantly increased when compared to that in non-tumor tissues (Fig. 3d, e), and that a positive correlation between mast cell degranulation (Supplementary Figure 2a) and ADM production most likely derived from EpCam+ tumor cells within GC tumors (Supplementary Figure 2b). Furthermore, the expression of ADM in TTCS was significantly elevated when compared to that in NTCS (Supplementary Figure 2c). To evaluate the potential role of GC tumor-derived ADM in the degranulation of mast cells which expressed RAMP2 (specific subunit of ADM receptor 1 heterodimer) within tumors (Fig. 3f), we added ADMR antagonist AMA into TTCS/mast cell co-culture system. Interestingly, blockade of ADM-ADMR interaction efficiently inhibited mast cell degranulation (Fig. 3g). Consistent with these findings, AKT phosphorylation was abolished when blocking tumor derived-ADM (Fig. 3h). These findings show that tumor-derived ADM plays an essential role in mast cell degranulation by activation of PI3K-AKT signaling pathway in the GC microenvironment.
Blockade of mast cell-associated degranulation inhibits tumor growth and GC progression
To test the effect of mast cell-associated degranulation on GC cells, we stimulated GC cells with the culture supernatants from TTCS-conditioned hCBMCs (referred as TTCS-hCBMCs in the following text). This potently induced GC cell proliferation compared to the culture supernatants from NTCS-conditioned hCBMCs (referred as NTCS-hCBMCs in the following text) (Fig. 4a). We also found that, compared to those exposed to the culture supernatants from NTCS-hCBMCs, GC cells exposed to the culture supernatants from TTCS-hCBMCs exhibited a delayed onset of apoptosis assessed by annexin V (Fig. 4b) and deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotides (dUTP) (Fig. 4c) detection. Similar observations were made when using the culture supernatants from TTCS-conditioned LAD2 cells (referred as TTCS-LAD2 in the following text)) (Supplementary Figure 3a–c). Together, these results suggest that mast cell-associated degranulation-derived culture supernatants promote the proliferation and inhibit the apoptosis of GC cells in vitro.
To further see whether mast cell-associated degranulation operates in the promotion on tumor growth and GC progression in vivo, we injected BMMCs with or without mast cell degranulation inhibitor Cromolyn into our established NOD/SCID mice bearing mouse MFC-derived GC. Consistent with a vital role in assisting tumors of mast cell-associated degranulation in vivo, compared to mice injected with BMMCs, mice injected with BMMCs plus Cromolyn showed decreased tumor volumes, disease progression and tumor cell proliferation (Fig. 5a, b). Similar observations were made when using LAD2 cells in our established NOD/SCID mice bearing human SGC-7901-derived GC (Fig. 5c, d). These findings suggest that mast cell-associated degranulation promotes GC cell proliferation and suppresses its apoptosis in vitro and thereby contributes to tumor growth and GC progression in vivo.
Mast cell-derived IL-17A contributes to tumor growth and GC progression
Several biologically active factors could be secreted through degranulation from mast cells. To see which molecules from mast cells might have effects on GC cells, we first used some reported molecules (G-CSF, SCF, TGF-β, IL-3, IL-6, IL-17A, IL-22, IL-33) secreted by mast cells to stimulate GC cells, and found that only IL-17A remarkably induced GC cell proliferation (Supplementary Figure 4a). Besides, we found that ADM could remarkably induced IL-17A release from mast cells in a dose-dependent manner (Supplementary Figure 4b). Interestingly, mast cell-derived IL-17A could be blocked by inhibition of mast cell degranulation with Cromolyn (Fig. 6b). Next, to evaluate the potential role of mast cell-derived IL-17A on GC cells, we added neutralizing antibodies against IL-17A into the culture supernatants from TTCS-hCBMCs. Interestingly, blocking IL-17A efficiently inhibited GC cell proliferation (Fig. 6c) and promoted GC cell apoptosis assessed by annexin V (Fig. 6d) and dUTP (Fig. 6e) detection. Similar observations were made when using the culture supernatants from TTCS-conditioned LAD2 cells (referred as TTCS-LAD2) (Supplementary Figure 4c–e).
As for the expression of IL-17A in mast cells within GC tumors (Fig. 6a), and the high expression of IL-17A receptor A (IL-17RA) on GC cells (Supplementary Figure 4f), we blocked IL-17A with neutralizing antibodies or deleted IL-17A with IL-17A-knockout mast cells in our established NOD/SCID mice bearing mouse MFC-derived or human SGC-7901-derived GC. Consistent with a vital role in assisting tumors of mast cell-derived IL-17A in vivo, compared to mice injected with mast cells plus control IgG or mast cells from WT mice, mice injected with mast cells plus IL-17A neutralizing antibodies or mast cells from IL-17A knockout mice showed decreased tumor volumes, disease progression and tumor cell proliferation (Fig. 6f, g and Supplementary Figure 4g). These findings together suggest that mast cell-derived IL-17A promote GC cell proliferation and suppress GC cell apoptosis in vitro and thereby contribute to tumor growth and GC progression in vivo.
Discussion
Illuminating the roles of host innate and adaptive immune cell within the tumor milieu is crucial for understanding the development and progression of human tumors19. Previous studies have been delineating the functions of adaptive immune cells in GC5,20, the roles of innate immune cells remain less well understood. Mast cells are a group of innate immune cells, which have been reported in GC11,21, but the presence of tumor-associated mast cells, as well as their precise mechanisms of communication in gastric cancer remains unclear. A better understanding of tumor and mast cell-derived factors modulating mechanisms such as mast cells degranulation, cancer cell growth, angiogenesis, or apoptosis resistance at the tumor body may prove to be rational biological targets for the therapeutic intervention of human cancers. Hence, we explore the hypothesis that gastric cancer-derived ADM induced mast cells activation and degranulation resulting in enhanced tumor promotion and progression.
In this study, we have shown that within GC mast cells play a positive role on promoting tumor progression. We have found that the infiltration number of mast cells in tumors was significantly increased at advanced stages of GC, with a high number of mast cells positively correlating with poor overall survival of GC patients. In addition, to our knowledge this is the first demonstration for tumor-derived ADM to induce mast cell degranulation in GC microenvironment, which exerts protumorigenic roles by facilitating tumor progression via releasing pro-inflammatory IL-17A.
In humans, mast cell infiltration in tumors influences disease progression and patient survival22,23. Hence, the analysis of mast cell infiltration in GC is a crucial area of clinical investigation. Our data shed some light on the clinical relevance of mast cells in GC. We observed a significant positive association between the number of mast cells infiltrated in GC and advanced clinical features of GC, such as tumor size (Fig. 1d). Besides, we found that an increased number of intratumoral mast cells predicted a lower rate of patient overall survival independently, as well as, disease-free survival was oppositely correlated with intratumoral mast cell levels (Fig. 1e, f), suggesting that tumor-infiltrating mast cells may become a helpful clinical prognostic marker in the future.
Mast cells are long-lived secretory cells, able to rapidly respond to modifications in their microenvironment and release large amounts of preformed and pre-activated immunomodulatory compounds through degranulation24,25. The well-known mechanism of mast cell activation is the engagement of the high-affinity receptor for IgE immunoglobulins in anaphylactic reactions7, however, the mechanisms of mast cell degranulation were not well understood in GC. In view of this, we focused on the potential mechanism and found an IgE-independent manner of mast cell activation in GC. In our study, we detected β-hexosaminidase release as an indicator of mast cell degranulation, and found that TTCS could activate and induce mast cell degranulation. It is known that the granule release by mast cells degranulation would result in a massive proinflammatory response at the tumor site that may be detrimental for cell survival. Alternatively, selective release of critical granules containing trophic or mitogenic factors would establish an enriching microenvironment to drive tumor proliferation. So, we screened pro-inflammatory molecules in human GC microenvironments by microarray (Fig. 3a), and stimulated mast cells with highly-expressed molecules. We found that only ADM remarkably induced mast cell degranulation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4b, c). ADM is a 52-amino acid peptide amide which has multifunction and participates in human carcinogenesis through diverse mechanisms15. In many human malignancies, the level of ADM is often elevated, including cancers of the brain, lung, colon and others26. In our study, we identified an increased ADM within GC microenvironment, meanwhile, the tumor-derived ADM effectively induced mast cell degranulation by activating PI3K-ATK pathway. Besides, some studies revealed the presence of ADM-producing mast cells in intratumoral tissue by immunohistochemical analysis from patients with lung or breast cancer26,27. This clinical finding further implicates ADM-mediated autocrine/paracrine interactions between tumor and mast cells, which is a potent angiogenic factor with similar molar activity to VEGF and bFGF.
Tumor-associated mast cells can also be activated to secrete an amount of biological molecules to mediate tumor progression8,28. Previous studies had found that mast cell released histamine via c-Kit/SCF, which increases cholangiocarcinoma growth, and angiogenesis29. Moreover, mast-cell-derived mediators: histamine, CXCL1 and CXCL10 could induce thyroid cancer cell survival and DNA synthesis in vitro30. In pancreatic cancer, activated mast cells promote tumor progression by IL-13 and tryptase22. IL-17A is a pleiotropic proinflammatory cytokine, participating in regulating tumor progress31,32 and associating with prognosis of carcinoma33. We demonstrated that mast cell-derived IL-17A can promote the proliferation and inhibit the apoptosis of GC cells in vitro. Importantly, with in vivo GC models, our hypothesis that mast cells effectively produce IL-17A by degranulation to facilitate GC progression was fully verified. In line with our data, a recent paper showed the effect of promoting growth of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas depended on IL-17A overexpression in NOD/SCID mice34. Recently, some new mechanisms of tumor proliferation have been found in digestive system neoplasm. Makino Y showed that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) derived connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) could mediates tumor-stroma interactions between hepatoma cells and hepatic stellate cells to accelerate HCC progression35. In colorectal tumor microenvironment, histidine decarboxylase (HDC)+ myeloid cells-derived CXCL13/CXCR5 axis that mediated Foxp3 expression and Treg proliferation, which affected CD8+ T cells directly and thus appeared to play key roles in suppressing tumoricidal immunity and facilitated colorectal tumor proliferation36. In our study, we further demonstrated that such tumor growth was through IL-17A from mast cells as blocking IL-17A reversed such growth. It is highly likely that in different tumors tumor-infiltrating mast cells may play their protumorigenic roles via different bioactive molecules.
Collectively, based on our in vitro and in vivo data, we propose a model involving complex interactions between ADM, mast cells, IL-17A and tumor cells within GC (Fig. 7). First, increased tumor-derived ADM induces mast cell degranulation via PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. Next, these activated mast cells exert a protumorigenic effect through releasing IL-17A, which promotes GC progression. In conclusion, our study has highlighted a notable role for mast cells in human GC and identified new mechanisms of GC–associated mast cells mediating tumor progression via secreting proinflammatory factor-dependent manners. Overall, blocking the function of mast cells that infiltrate tumors or the secreting protumorigenic mediators from mast cells may be a useful therapeutic strategy for preventing GC progress.
Materials and Methods
Patients and specimens
Fresh gastric tumor (homogeneous cellularity, without foci of necrosis, including intratumoral and marginal tissues), peritumoral and non-tumor (non-tumor tissues, at least 5 cm distant from the tumor site) tissues and autologous peripheral blood were obtained from patients with GC who underwent surgical resection at the Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University. Before taking the samples, none of these patients had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Patients with infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, or multi-primary cancers were excluded. The stages of tumors were determined according to the TNM classification system of the International Union Against Cancer (7th edition). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject. Antibodies and other reagents were listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Preparation of TTCS and NTCS
Tumor tissue culture supernatants (TTCS) or non-tumor tissue culture supernatants (NTCS) were prepared by plating autologous tumor or non-tumor gastric tissues (0.5 cm3) in 1 ml RPMI 1640 medium for 24 h. The supernatant was then centrifuged and harvested. RPMI 1640 was referred as Medium, which was set as a non-conditioned media control.
Preparation of the culture supernatants of TTCS-conditioned or NTCS-conditioned mast cells
TTCS or NTCS were prepared as above. hCBMCs or LAD2 cells were cultured with autologous 50% TTCS or NTCS for 24 h. Then the culture supernatants were centrifuged and harvested. TTCS-conditioned or NTCS-conditioned mast cells were referred as TTCS- or NTCS-mast cells in the following text.
Mast cell degranulation measured by β-hexosaminidase release assay
Analysis of tumor microenvironment-induced β-hexosaminidase release from human mast cells was accomplished by following previously established protocol26. Briefly, hCBMCs or LAD2 cells (1 × 105 cells/well in 96-well plates) were suspended in Tyrodes buffer (10 nmol/L HEPES, 137 mmol/L NaCl, 2.7 mmol/L KCl, 0.4 mmol/L Na2HPO4, 5.6 mmol/L D-glucose, 1.8 mmol/L CaCl2, 1.3 mmol/L MgSO4) containing 0.025% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Autologous 50% TTCS (with or without ADM Fragment 22–52 (AMA) (1 μM) or Cromolyn (250 μM)) or NTCS, or appropriate concentrations of ADM (10, 50, 100 ng/ml) or different cytokines (GM-CSF, M-CSF, G-CSF, IFN-γ, TGF-β, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-22) (100 ng/ml) were added into mast cell suspensions and incubated for 60 minutes at 37 °C to stimulate β- hexosaminidase release. The release of β-hexosaminidase in the supernatants and the cell pellets (solubilizing with 0.5% Triton X-100 in Tyrode’s buffer) were measured with p-nitrophenyl N-acetyl-b-D-glucosaminide (PNAG) in 0.1 M sodium citrate (pH = 4.5) for 60 minutes at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped using 0.4 mol/L glycine (pH = 10.7) and the absorbance was determined at 405 nm. Resulting beta-hexosaminidase activity was calculated as (mean ± SEM): [(β-hexosaminidase in supernatant × 2)/(β-hexosaminidase in supernatant + {total β-hexosaminidase in cell pellet × 4})] × 100%. RPMI 1640 medium and Compound48/80 (5 μg/ml) were placed in the cell cultures as blank and positive controls respectively.
Besides, for the signaling pathway inhibition experiments, LAD2 cells were pretreated with 2 μl AG490 (a JAK inhibitor), BAY 11-7082 (an IκBα inhibitor), SP600125 (a c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitor), SB203580 (a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor), U0126 (MEK-1 and MEK-2 inhibitor), or Wortmannin (a PI3K inhibitor) (10 μM) for 2 h, then the cells were stimulated with 50% TTCS for 1 h and harvested as above. Since the inhibitors were dissolved in DMSO, parallel cell groups were pretreated with DMSO (2 μl) or culture media as controls. Then the β-hexosaminidase release was measured as above.
GC cell proliferation and apoptosis assay
Human GC cell lines AGS and SGC-7901 were stimulated with - 50% TTCS or NTCS, the culture supernatants of hCBMCs or LAD2 cells, the culture supernatants of TTCS-conditioned or NTCS-conditioned hCBMCs or LAD2 cells, or different cytokines (G-CSF, SCF, IFN-γ, TGF-β, IL-3, IL-6, IL-17A, IL-22, IL-33) (100 ng/ml) for 72 h, the cell proliferation was measured by CCK-8 (Dojindo) and the cell apoptosis was quantified using Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences) or APO-Direct Apoptosis Detection (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In some cases, human IL-17A neutralizing antibody (20 μg/ml) or control IgG (20 μg/ml) was added in the culture system.
In vivo tumor inhibition assay
All animal experiments were undertaken with the approval from the Animal Ethical and Experimental Committee of Third Military Medical University. 106 GC cells (MFC or SGC-7901 cells) in 100 μl of buffered saline were subcutaneously injected into the axillary tissues of female nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice (5–7 week, one tumor per mouse). Once the xenografts of GC reached the volume of 40 mm3, Cromolyn (10 mg/kg) dissolved in saline was administered intraperitoneally daily (the control group injected with saline). The next day after the first Cromolyn injection, 5 × 105 mast cells (BMMCs from WT or IL-17A knockout mice or LAD2 cells) in 50 μl of buffered saline were injected into the tumor cavity (the control group injected with saline). In some cases, neutralizing antibodies against human/mouse IL-17A (20 μg per mouse) or control IgG (20 μg per mouse) were subsequently injected into the peritoneum in 100 μl of buffered saline every 2 days after the mast cell injection. Tumor size was measured every 2 days by two independent observers using calipers fitted with a vernier scale. Tumor volumes (V) were calculated with the formula: V = A × B2/2 (A = axial diameter; B = rotational diameter). Once the mice were killed, tumors were weighed and photographed, and were further fixed for immunohistochemical staining.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Student t test was generally used to analyze the differences between two groups, but when the variances differed, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. For multigroup data analysis, an ANOVA analysis was used. Correlations between parameters were assessed using the Pearson correlation analysis and linear regression analysis as appropriate. Overall/disease-free survival was defined as the interval between surgery and death/recurrence or between surgery and the last observation for surviving/disease-free patients. The known tumor-unrelated deaths (eg, accidental death) were excluded from the death record for this study. Cumulative survival time was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival was measured in month; the log-rank test was applied to compare between 2 groups. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for patient overall survival was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. SPSS statistical software (version 13.0) was used for all statistical analysis. All data were analyzed using 2-tailed tests, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Prof. Wei Zhang for donating the human mast cell line LAD2, and Xiao Luo for collecting samples from gastric cancer patients. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1302200) and grant of National Natural Science Foundation of China (81670510).
Author contributions
Study concept and design and drafting of the manuscript: Yuan Zhuang. Acquisition of data and analysis and interpretation of data: Yuan Zhuang, Yi-pin Lv. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Yuan Zhuang. Statistical analysis: Yuan Zhuang, Yi-pin Lv, and Na Chen. Obtained funding: Yuan Zhuang. Technical, or material support: Yong-sheng Teng, Ting-ting Wang, Fang-yuan Mao, Liu-sheng Peng, Jin-yu Zhang, Ping Cheng, Yu-gang Liu, Hui Kong, Bin Han, Qiang Ma, Ke Li, and Quan-ming Zou. Final approval of the version to be published: Yuan Zhuang.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by: T. Kaufmann
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Co-first authors: Yi-pin Lv, Liu-sheng Peng
Contributor Information
Ke Li, Phone: +(86)023-67983557, Email: 570235173@qq.com.
Quanming Zou, Phone: +(86)023-68752315, Email: qmzou@tmmu.edu.cn.
Yuan Zhuang, Phone: +(86)023-68752315, Email: yuanzhuang1983@yahoo.com.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-018-1100-1).
References
- 1.Van Cutsem E, Sagaert X, Topal B, Haustermans K, Prenen H. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:2654–2664. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30354-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zou W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and theirtherapeutic relevance. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2005;5:263–274. doi: 10.1038/nrc1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumormicroenvironment. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:1014–1022. doi: 10.1038/ni.2703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.He S, Wang L, Wu Y, Li D, Zhang Y. CCL3 and CCL20-recruited dendritic cells modified by melanoma antigen gene-1 induce anti-tumor immunity against gastric cancer ex vivo and in vivo. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010;29:37. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhuang Y, et al. CD8(+) T cells that produce interleukin-17 regulate myeloid-derived suppressor cells and are associated with survival time of patients with gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:951–962. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Galvin KC, et al. Extratumoral PD-1 blockade does not perpetuate obesity-associated inflammation in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2018;418:230–238. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kalesnikoff J, Galli SJ. New developments in mast cell biology. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:1215–1223. doi: 10.1038/ni.f.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marichal T, Tsai M, Galli SJ. Mast cells: potential positive and negative roles in tumor biology. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2013;1:269–279. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu L, et al. Activation of mucosal mast cells promotes inflammation-related colon cancer development through recruiting and modulating inflammatory CD11b(+)Gr1(+) cells. Cancer Lett. 2015;364:173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sibilano R, Frossi B, Pucillo CE. Mast cell activation: a complex interplay of positive and negative signaling pathways. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014;44:2558–2566. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lin C, et al. Tryptase expression as a prognostic marker in patients with resected gastric cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2017;104:1037–1044. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Micu GV, et al. Correlations between the density of tryptase positive mast cells (DMCT) and that of new blood vessels (CD105+) in patients with gastric cancer. Rom. J. Intern. Med. 2016;54:113–120. doi: 10.1515/rjim-2016-0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Guidolin D, et al. Spatial distribution of mast cells around vessels and glands in human gastric carcinoma. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017;17:531–539. doi: 10.1007/s10238-017-0452-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santiago JA, et al. Synthetic human adrenomedullin and adrenomedullin 15-52 have potent short-lived vasodilator activity in the hindlimb vascular bed of the cat. Life Sci. 1994;55:L85–L90. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(94)00652-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Larrayoz IM, Martinez-Herrero S, Garcia-Sanmartin J, Ochoa-Callejero L, Martinez A. Adrenomedullin and tumour microenvironment. J. Transl. Med. 2014;12:339. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0339-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang L, et al. Adrenomedullin is a therapeutic target in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2014;134:2041–2050. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Siclari VA, et al. Tumor-expressed adrenomedullin accelerates breast cancer bone metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:458. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0458-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen Y, et al. Infiltrating mast cells promote renal cell carcinoma angiogenesis by modulating PI3K→AKT→GSK3β→AM signaling. Oncogene. 2017;36:2879–2888. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ. Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science. 2011;331:1565–1570. doi: 10.1126/science.1203486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Feichtenbeiner A, et al. Critical role of spatial interaction between CD8(+) and Foxp3(+) cells in human gastric cancer: the distance matters. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2014;63:111–119. doi: 10.1007/s00262-013-1491-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ammendola M, et al. Mast cell positivity to tryptase correlates with metastatic lymph nodes in gastrointestinal cancer patients treated surgically. Oncology. 2013;85:111–116. doi: 10.1159/000351145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ma Y, Hwang RF, Logsdon CD, Ullrich SE. Dynamic mast cell-stromal cell interactions promote growth of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73:3927–3937. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Franco G, et al. Bone marrow stroma CD40 expression correlates with inflammatory mast cell infiltration and disease progression in splenic marginal zone lymphoma. Blood. 2014;123:1836–1849. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-497271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wernersson S, Pejler G. Mast cell secretory granules: armed for battle. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:478–494. doi: 10.1038/nri3690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gilfillan AM, Beaven MA. Regulation of mast cell responses in health and disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2011;31:475–529. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v31.i6.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zudaire E, et al. Adrenomedullin is a cross-talk molecule that regulates tumor and mast cell function during human carcinogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2006;168:280–291. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sakimoto S, et al. An angiogenic role for adrenomedullin in choroidal neovascularization. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e58096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Westerberg CM, Hagglund H, Nilsson G. Proteasome inhibition upregulates Bim and induces caspase-3-dependent apoptosis in human mast cells expressing the Kit D816V mutation. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e417. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Johnson C, et al. Inhibition of mast cell-derived histamine decreases human cholangiocarcinoma growth and differentiation via c-kit/stem cell factor-dependent signaling. Am. J. Pathol. 2016;186:123–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Melillo RM, et al. Mast cells have a protumorigenic role in human thyroid cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29:6203–6215. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vonderheide RH. Tumor-promoting inflammatory networks in pancreatic neoplasia: another reason to loathe Kras. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:553–554. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kryczek I, et al. Phenotype, distribution, generation, and functional and clinical relevance of Th17 cells in the human tumor environments. Blood. 2009;114:1141–1149. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-208249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liao R, et al. High expression of IL-17 and IL-17RE associate with poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;32:3. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ferretti E, et al. Interleukin-17A promotes the growth of human germinal center derived non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4:e1030560. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1030560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Makino Y., et al. CTGF mediates tumor-stroma interactions between hepatoma cells and hepatic stellate cells to accelerate HCC progression. Cancer Res. (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 36.Chen X, et al. Histidine decarboxylase (HDC)-expressing granulocytic myeloid cells induce and recruit Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in murine colon cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2017;10:e1290034. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1290034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.