Abstract
Insecticide resistance has been reported in many important agricultural pests, and alternative management methods are required. Baculoviruses qualify as an effective, yet environmentally benign, biocontrol agent but their efficacy against generalist herbivores may be influenced by diet. However, few studies have investigated the tritrophic interactions of plant, pest, and pathogen from both a gene expression and physiological perspective. Here we use microscopy and transcriptomics to examine how diet affects the structure of peritrophic matrix (PM) in Trichoplusia ni larvae and consequently their susceptibility to the baculovirus, AcMNPV. Larvae raised on potato leaves had lower transcript levels for chitinase and chitin deacetylase genes, and possessed a thicker and more multi-layered PM than those raised on cabbage or artificial diet, which could contribute to their significantly lower susceptibility to the baculovirus. The consequences of these changes underline the importance of considering dietary influences on pathogen susceptibility in pest management strategies.
Keywords: cabbage looper, AcMNPV baculovirus, chitinase, chitin deacetylase, midgut transcriptome, pathogen resistance, peritrophic matrix, midgut pH
Introduction
Baculoviruses are entomopathogens with high host specificity but some, such as the Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV), can infect a wide range of lepidopterans (Clem and Passarelli, 2013). Once ingested, the alkaline pH of the larval midgut dissolves the viral occlusion body (OB), releasing the occlusion-derived virions (ODVs) that rapidly pass through the midgut peritrophic matrix (PM) and infect the microvilli of columnar midgut epithelium cells (Granados and Lawler, 1981). However, the infection process can be affected by the larval food source (Duffey et al., 1995; Cory and Hoover, 2006) as this shapes the environment of the gut (Keating et al., 1990; Brodersen et al., 2012). Secondary metabolites (phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins) affect the palatability of plant tissue and influence caterpillar growth, which in turn affects larval behavior and plant-pest interactions (Sarfraz et al., 2011).
Brassica spp. synthesize glucosinolates, a significant class of natural defense compounds, which when ingested by insects are hydrolysed by myrosinase to produce isothiocyanates, oxazolidine thiones, epithionitroles, and nitrils (sometimes known as the “mustard oil bomb,” Grubb and Abel, 2006). These compounds are toxic repellents to some insects (Mithen et al., 2000; Lambrix et al., 2001; Talalay and Fahey, 2001; Agrawal and Kurashige, 2003) but others have evolved counter-adaptations including reduced plant cell disruption, rapid absorption of intact glucosinolates and rapid metabolic conversion of glucosinolates to harmless compounds (Winde and Wittstock, 2011). Although the functional basis of glucosinolate detoxification remains to be determined, there is transcriptomic evidence that glutathione S-transferases and cytochrome P450s are involved (Wadleigh and Yu, 1988; Whiteman et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2013). Solanum spp. produce glycoalkaloids as natural defense compounds which inhibit acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase, both of which catalyze the hydrolysis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, as well as interfering with calcium and sodium ion transport across cell membranes (Schwarz et al., 1995). In insect herbivores, the mechanisms of counter-adaptation are predominantly present in the fat body, which contains detoxification enzymes and ABC transporters (Yang et al., 2007).
Lepidopterans have both biochemical and physical gut attributes to counteract the challenges of a wide diet range. As one of the most alkaline environments in a natural system, a high midgut pH retains the nutritional quality of ingested plant proteins and offsets the toxicity of their host plant's defensive compounds (Woodham, 1983). Maintaining a pH > 8 prevents the antidigestive effects of tannin-protein-aggregates (Felton and Duffey, 1991). The physical peritrophic matrix (PM), which separates the gut content from the midgut wall, is another protective feature of the lepidopteran midgut. The PM consists of a proteinaceous matrix embedded in a chitin substructure that serves in the combined roles of digestion and absorption of nutrients, mechanical protection, toxin nullification, and pathogen restriction (Spence, 1991). However, while more toxic diets can induce thicker PM formation which affords greater protection from toxins and pathogens, there is a possible trade-off relating to digestive efficiency. For example, the growth rate of Heliothis virescens was reported to be lower when larvae were fed a more toxic diet that resulted in a thicker PM, although there was an additional effect as the larvae had a lower susceptibility to viral pathogens (Plymale et al., 2008).
Trichoplusia ni is a generalist herbivore capable of feeding on plants from many families, including Solanaceae and Brassicaceae. Its larval PM is typical of most lepidopterans, forming as a thin layer at the anterior end of the midgut and becoming progressively thicker as additional components are added to its structure by the midgut epithelium (Adang and Spence, 1981; Harper and Granados, 1999; Toprak et al., 2014). As it is thinnest and most porous at the anterior region this could help explain why the vast majority of AcMNPV infections in T. ni are initiated in the anterior midgut (Javed et al., 2016). The components contributing to PM architecture, synthesis, and function include structural (peritrophins, mucins, glycoproteins, lipases), microvesicle delivery (gelsolin, annexin), framework (chitin synthase, chitinase, chitin deacetylase), and hormonal effectors (ecdysone, juvenile hormone related) (Hegedus et al., 2016).
In the present study, we undertook experiments to confirm that variable diets could alter the susceptibility of T. ni larvae to viral infections (Cory and Hoover, 2006; Shikano et al., 2010) and to determine if larval diet affected the structure of the PM. In addition, using RNA-seq analysis, we investigated larval midgut gene expression to determine if the expression of various categories of genes whose products could influence PM structure differed with diet.
Materials and methods
Insect rearing, diet, and virus
All insects used were obtained from a T. ni culture reared on cabbage under a 16L:8D photoperiod at 25°C at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada's (AAFC) London Research and Development Centre (LRDC). Golden Acre Cabbage (Brassica oleraceae) and Kennebec Potato (Solanum tuberosum) were grown in a greenhouse at 16L:8D photoperiod at 25°C while the McMorran wheat germ-based artificial diet (Adkisson et al., 1960) was purchased from Insect Production Services (Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada). Virus used for infections was derived from the AcMNPV bacmid bMON14272 backbone repaired with gfp under the control of the OpMNPV ie1 promoter (Javed et al., 2016).
Bioassays
Fourth instar larvae were placed in 5.5 cm diameter petri dishes lined with moist filter paper and provided with either a 6 mm diameter potato or cabbage leaf disc (cut from the leaves of plants that were ~1 month old) or a 5 mm3 cube of artificial diet. The food samples were treated with viral doses calculated from preliminary bioassays: 15, 25, 50, 100, or 200 OBs on cabbage, 50, 100, 150, 250, or 400 OBs on potato, or 25, 50, 100, 200, or 350 OBs on artificial diet. The concentrations obtained using serial dilution were confirmed with hemocytometer counts. Controls for the three diet treatments were treated with 0.05% Triton X-100 in water, the solution used to suspend the OBs. In all cases, the virus was applied in a 2 μl droplet and on leaf disks the droplet was allowed to dry before being fed to insects. In the case of artificial diet, a square of parafilm was placed underneath the cube to ensure the solution was not absorbed by the filter paper. Once the treated food was completely consumed, untreated food was provided for 7 days post treatment or until the larvae pupated. There were three replicates of ten larvae per concentration per diet treatment and mortality was recorded daily. LD50 values were estimated and Fieller's method used to calculate subsequent 95% confidence intervals in the R add-on package drc (Cox, 1990; Ritz et al., 2015). Each continuous dose response curve was modeled based on the parameters of identical lower and upper limits with only binomial responses (alive or dead) and the results were compared pairwise within drc for identity based on slope and LD50 using a one-way ANOVA. GraphPad Prism software was used to generate Figure 1 showing the curves.
Double-barrelled ion-selective microelectrode midgut pH measurements
Construction of double-barrelled ion-selective microelectrodes has been described in detail in Ianowski et al. (2002) and Ianowski and O'Donnell (2004) so the modified protocol used is described briefly. Double-barrelled “theta” glass microcapillaries were pulled to a fine point using a vertical micropipette puller PE-2 (Narashige, Japan). The pH-barrel was silanized to aid retention of the hydrophobic H+ ionophore cocktail, as described by Ianowski et al. (2002). The ion-selective barrel was then filled with a solution containing 100 mM sodium citrate and 100 mM NaCl (pH = 6.0). The reference barrel was filled with 150 mM KCl. Finally, the ion-selective barrel was tip-filled with Hydrogen ionophore I cocktail B. Each barrel was connected through chlorided silver wires to the inputs of a high-input impedance differential electrometer (HiZ-223, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) which was referenced to a bath electrode filled with 3M KCl in 4% agar. The pH microelectrodes were calibrated in TAPS-buffered solutions of pH 8, 9, and 10 with ionic strength approximating that of T. ni diet.
Ten 4th instar larvae from each of the three diets were pinned straight while submerged in saline solution. A longitudinal incision was made along the length of the caterpillar to expose the midgut so that a pH microelectrode could be inserted into the anterior lumen of the midgut and the pH recorded. All measurements were performed in situ, i.e., without removing the gut from the animal and completed within 5 min from the end of dissection. Microelectrode voltages were low-pass filtered at 2 Hz, digitized and recorded using a PowerLab data acquisition system (AD Instruments, Colorado Springs, CO) and analyzed using Chart software (Ad Instruments). pH values were calculated from microelectrode voltages which were stable to within 0.1 mV over 10 s. The pH data for the three diets were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and assessed for significance using the Holm–Sidak method (Sidak, 1967; Holm, 1979).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Larvae were reared on each of the three diets until the 4th instar (head capsule size 1.0–1.3 mm), at which time their midguts were dissected out, the food bolus removed, so that the PM could be cut lengthwise and immersed in Sorenson's phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde as a primary fixative. After triple buffer rinsing, samples were fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h, triple rinsed again, and then dehydrated in a graded ethanol series before being dried in a graded hexamethyldisilazane series (Shivley and Miller, 2009). Samples were mounted, gold sputtered, and observed with a Hitachi 3400-N VP-SEM. Three midgut samples per diet category were processed and the anterior, middle, and posterior regions of the resulting PMs from the larvae reared on differing diets were compared.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
The initial steps of TEM preparation were identical to those used for SEM, up to and including the fixation in 1% osmium tetroxide and secondary wash. Following that, TEM preparation included dehydration in a graded acetone series before infiltration and embedding in epon-araldite resin and finally baking at 60°C for 48 h. Coarse trimming was done using a razor blade and finer sectioning done on a Sorval Ultracut with a diamond knife. All sections were from the anterior region of the PM and netted on copper grids. Samples were post stained in the dark for 20 min with uranyl acetate, rinsed in five water droplets, stained for 2 min with lead citrate, and rinsed in three water droplets. Grid samples were examined and images taken using a Philips CM10 TEM 60 KV. The midguts from three larvae from each diet category were examined.
RNA extraction, RNA-seq, and transcriptomic analysis
Midguts of 4th instar larvae from each diet category were dissected in Calpode's insect saline (pH = 7.2, 10.7 mM NaCl, 25.8 mM KCl, 90 mM glucose, 29 mM CaCl2, 20 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES), immediately suspended in RNAlater buffer (Ambion, Fisher Scientific) and stored at −20°C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted from five pooled midguts using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen), and replicated three times for each diet treatment. The quality and quantity of RNA were assessed using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent). RNA samples were diluted to 300 ng/μL in DEPC-treated water. Strand-specific libraries were constructed and sequencing performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform using 100 bp single-end reads protocol at McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre (Montreal, QC, Canada).
Messenger RNA-seq reads were mapped to a reference T. ni transcriptome containing 58,200 contigs that was previously assembled from 3 tissue-specific transcriptomes (Javed et al., 2017). Subsequent analysis and data handling were done using CLC Genomics Workbench version 10.0.1 (Qiagen Bioinformatics). Before mapping, library reads with <50 nucleotides were discarded. Gene expression tracks were then generated from RNA-seq analysis. Finally, all potential pairings of different diets were tested for differential expression. The output from DESeq analysis included normalized mean number of reads assigned to a contig, log2 fold change, and its statistical significance. A contig was considered differentially expressed if the absolute value of the log2 fold change was ≥3 and the adjusted p-value was ≤ 0.001 following Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction (Benjamini and Yekutieli, 2001). Contigs corresponding to genes of interest were screened from all those found to be differentially expressed. Contig IDs without annotation were analyzed by BLASTN comparison with the NCBI database. The NCBI accessions and descriptions of matching entries using an E-value cut-off of 0.001 are reported in Supplementary Table 1.
Results
Diet based T. ni bioassay lethality curves
Larval diets had a significant effect on the susceptibility of T. ni larvae to AcMNPV baculovirus (Figure 1), with LD50s of 3.1 OBs (95% CI: 0, 39.1); 16.6 OBs (95% CI: 8.4, 32.5); and 61.6 OBs (95% CI: 37.2, 102.1) for larvae reared on artificial diet, cabbage, and potato respectively. The LD50s for larvae reared on artificial diet and cabbage did not differ significantly (p > 0.05, F-ratio = 2.76, df = 2) but both differed significantly from the LD50 value for larvae reared on potato (cabbage: p = 0.0019, F-ratio = 7.81, df = 2; artificial diet: p < 0.001, F-ratio = 14.16, df = 2).
Measurements of anterior midgut pH
Diet had a significant effect on the pH in the anterior midgut of 4th instar T. ni, with larvae raised on cabbage having a significantly less alkaline pH (X = 8.44; SD ± 0.26) than those raised on artificial diet (X = 9.48; SD ± 0.53) or potato (X = 9.28; SD ± 0.52) (Figure 2). Statistically significant differences were determined using a one-way ANOVA coupled with a Holm-Sidak multiple comparison test (p < 0.001, F-ratio = 14.726). The degrees of freedom between groups = 2; the residual degrees of freedom = 27.
SEM characterization of the PM
The structural differences between the anterior, middle, and posterior sections of the midgut are presented in Figure 3. The anterior region has relatively shallow but extensive folds, transitioning into tight coils in the middle region and becoming degraded and sloughed at the posterior end.
While the anterior region of the PM can be morphologically differentiated from the middle and posterior sections, significant morphological differences between the anterior regions of larvae raised on the three diets were not observed.
TEM characterization of the PM
TEM imaging revealed significant morphological variability of the T. ni PM, both within and between diets, and the simplest morphologies are shown in Figure 4A. The PM of larvae reared on both artificial diet and cabbage is thin (≤500 nm in thickness) but with a more dense and uniform appearance in the cabbage treatment. In potato-raised larvae, the PM is usually thin (≤500 nm in thickness) but with its layers separated, thus spanning several microns.
By comparison, the most complex forms of PM (Figure 4B) have very different levels of organization, having thicker, less organized and more numerous layers than those shown in Figure 4A. Larvae reared on artificial diet vary from having a PM that exhibits separated laminae, spanning several microns, to one that is almost completely unraveled, with little structural integrity. In cabbage-raised larvae, the PM has divided laminae and further divided internal fibrils spanning several microns, but each layer is well defined. The structure of the PM in the potato treatment has bends and kinks of multiple fibrils and divided laminae, showing a much greater level of disorganization than in larvae from the other two diet treatments. This highly disorganized form of the PM in larvae reared on potato is the main form present and its prevalence over the simple form was greatest in this treatment group. Furthermore, regardless of form, the PM of larvae raised on potato also featured more numerous microvesicles (Figures 4A,B).
mRNA sequenced read processing and quality control
The sequencing of 9 libraries constructed from larval midgut RNA extracted from insects fed 3 different diets yielded 652,598,015 reads, with raw reads per library ranging from 57.8 to 80.3 million reads, with a mean of 72.5 million. The percentage of reads remaining after trimming ranged between 95.8 and 97.7%, with the average read length being 99.8 bp. The proportion of reads per sample mapping to the reference transcriptome ranged from 94.6 to 96.5%. The number of uniquely mapped reads per sample ranged from 48.4 to 64.2 million, with a mean of 58.8 million. The percentage of uniquely mapped reads ranged from 81.6 to 87.3%. All statistics stated are reported in Supplementary Table 2.
Diet induced transcriptomic responses in T. ni midgut
Using a cut-off of ≥3 absolute fold change and a FDR-corrected p-value of ≤0.001, the total number of contigs significantly differentially expressed for cabbage vs. artificial diet was 1,985; potato vs. cabbage was 1,118 and potato vs. artificial diet was 1,753. There were 132 shared contigs between all diets (Figure 5).
From the contigs that were differentially expressed, we selected those within gene categories encoding products likely to be involved in the PM's architecture, synthesis, and function, for further analysis. The following gene categories were included: structural (peritrophins, mucins, glycoproteins, lipases), microvesicle delivery (gelsolin, annexin), framework (chitin synthase, chitinase, chitin deacetylase) and hormonal effectors (ecdysone and juvenile hormone related). The overall midgut comparisons between 4th instar T. ni raised on different diets are presented in Table 1 while the comparison with expanded statistics are given in Supplementary Tables 3–5. Of all the gene categories of interest, the downregulation of contigs corresponding to chitinase and chitin deacetylase were most correlated with diet toxicity.
Table 1.
Gene category | Contig ID | Contig length (bp) | Sequence description | Cabbage relative to artificial | Potato relative to cabbage | Potato relative to artificial |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chitin Synthase | gi|687040850 | 227 | Chitin synthase A | – | – | ↓ 13x |
Chitinases | 11990 | 1,399 | Chitinase domain | ↓ 3x | – | – |
17052/16243/ gi|687056067 | 1,186 | Viral-like chitinase | ↓ 10x | – | ↓ 13x | |
17700 | 676 | Chitinase | – | – | ↓ 8x | |
gi|687027891 | 9,581 | Chitinase 10 | – | ↓ 4x | ↓ 10x | |
gi|687027960 | 3,179 | Chitinase 3 | ↓ 9x | – | ↓ 13x | |
gi|687094659/8386 | 1,202 | Chitinase 2 | ↓ 17x | ↓ 4x | ↓ 68x | |
gi|687131816 | 2,030 | Endochitinase A1-like | – | – | ↓ 3x | |
Chitin Deacetylase | 16131/11096 | 1,843 | Chitin deacetylase 1 | – | ↓ 2x | ↓ 6x |
Glycoprotein | 838 | 4,146 | Glycoprotein 1-like | ↓ 3x | – | – |
9115 | 789 | Glycoprotein 2B-like | ↑ 3x | – | – | |
12335 | 654 | Glycoprotein 2B-like | ↑ 3x | – | – | |
12706 | 1,400 | Glycoprotein 1-like | ↓ 4x | – | ↓ 4x | |
13031 | 1,431 | Glycoprotein 1-like | ↑ 3x | – | – | |
13710 | 2,774 | Glycoprotein 2C-like | ↑ 25x | – | ↑ 34x | |
13711 | 2,440 | Glycoprotein 2C-like | ↑ 32x | – | ↑ 42x | |
13714 | 559 | Glycoprotein 2C-like | ↑ 28x | – | – | |
17683 | 603 | Glycoprotein 2C-like | – | – | ↑ 6x | |
18285 | 471 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein ABD-5-like | ↑ 7x | – | ↑ 7x | |
18333 | 590 | Glycoprotein ABD-5-like | ↑ 8x | – | – | |
Ecdysone Inducibles | 3024 | 1,783 | Ecdysone-induced protein 74EF isoform A | ↑ 4x | – | ↑ 4x |
5946 | 453 | Ecdysone receptor transcript variant X2 | ↓ 5x | – | ↓ 4x | |
6995 | 571 | Ecdysteroid-induced (E75) | – | – | ↓ 4x | |
8772 | 1,940 | Zinc finger protein on ecdysone puffs | ↓ 3x | – | – | |
16286 | 1,185 | 3-dehydrecdysone 3b-reductase | ↓ 4x | – | ↓ 6x | |
18136 | 2,470 | 20-hydroxy-ecdysone receptor | ↓ 3x | ↑ 15x | ↑ 4x | |
gi|687100743 | 380 | Ecdysone oxidase gene | ↓ 4x | – | ↓ 4x | |
Juvenile hormone inducibles | 2789 | 3,733 | Juvenile hormone-inducible protein | ↓ 5x | – | – |
4247 | 1,993 | Juvenile hormone epoxide hydrolase precursor | – | ↑ 3x | – | |
6007 | 1,020 | Juvenile hormone epoxide hydrolase-like | – | ↓ 7x | ↓ 11x | |
9577 | 2,010 | Juvenile hormone esterase-like isoform | ↓ 4x | – | – | |
11982 | 494 | Juvenile hormone esterase precursor (JHE) | ↓ 19x | – | ↓ 27x | |
13294 | 2,389 | Juvenile hormone epoxide hydrolase-like protein | – | ↓ 5x | – | |
14365 | 2,322 | Juvenile hormone esterase-like | – | – | ↓ 5,811x | |
16406 | 2,351 | Juvenile hormone sensitive hemolymph protein | – | – | ↓ 8x | |
16491 | 850 | Juvenile hormone-inducible protein | – | ↓ 3x | ↓ 4x | |
17075 | 1,195 | Juvenile hormone esterase-like | – | – | ↓ 5x | |
17228 | 1,428 | Juvenile hormone epoxide hydrolase-like | – | – | ↓ 25x | |
18269 | 714 | Juvenile hormone binding-like protein | ↓ 24x | – | ↓ 78x | |
gi|687052097 | 205 | Juvenile hormone esterase precursor (JHE) | ↓ 25x | – | ↓ 35x | |
Gelsolin | 14408 | 1,099 | Gelsolin-like | ↑ 3x | – | – |
Mucins | 2899 | 4,725 | Mucin-12-like | – | – | ↓ 8x |
8946 | 4,324 | Mucin-2-like | ↓ 3x | – | ↓ 6x | |
16236 | 442 | Intestinal mucin | – | ↑ 10x | ↑ 11x | |
17180 | 417 | Mucin-5AC | – | – | ↓ 7x | |
gi|687050021 | 288 | Mucin-5AC | ↓ 13x | – | – | |
gi|687060229 | 294 | Mucin-5AC-like | ↓ 16x | – | ↓ 19x | |
gi|687064266 | 219 | Mucin-5AC-like | ↓ 19x | – | ↓ 13x | |
gi|687073777 | 537 | Mucin-5AC-like | ↓ 17x | – | ↓ 10x | |
gi|687079129 | 295 | Mucin-5AC-like | ↓ 8x | – | ↓ 10x | |
gi|687080496 | 259 | Mucin-5AC-like | ↓ 12x | – | ↓ 5x | |
gi|687085871 | 401 | Mucin-2-like | ↑ 5x | – | – | |
gi|687093538 | 984 | Mucin-5AC | – | – | ↓ 12x | |
Lipases | 3030 | 1,018 | Lipase 3-like | ↑ 8x | ↓ 7x | – |
10385 | 437 | Lipase (Lipn004) | – | – | ↓ 3x | |
10606 | 1,230 | Lipase 3-like | ↓ 4x | ↓ 6x | ↓ 26x | |
11520 | 893 | Lipase-like | – | – | ↓ 3x | |
15809 | 1,398 | Lipase 1-like | – | ↓ 4x | ↓ 4x | |
16200 | 153 | Insect intestinal lipase 7 | – | ↑ 4x | – | |
16325 | 797 | Insect intestinal lipase 6 | – | ↑ 4x | – | |
16375 | 977 | Insect intestinal lipase 6 | ↓ 3x | ↓ 4x | ↓ 15x | |
16377 | 660 | Lipase 3-like | ↑ 3x | – | ↑ 6x | |
16389 | 885 | Lipase-like | – | ↓ 159x | ↓ 96x | |
16607 | 559 | Lipase ABHD12 | ↓ 5x | – | ↓ 5x | |
16887 | 568 | Lipase member H-like | ↑ 23x | – | ↑ 48x | |
17002 | 670 | Bile salt-activated lipase-like | ↑ 5x | – | ↑ 3x | |
17081 | 483 | Lipase-like | – | – | ↓ 4x | |
17396 | 880 | Lipase 3-like | ↑ 69x | – | ↑ 35x | |
gi|687078584 | 265 | Lipase-like | ↓ 26x | ↑ 608x | ↑ 23x | |
gi|687085460 | 404 | Lipase-like | ↓ 20x | ↑ 468x | ↑ 23x | |
gi|687101661 | 671 | Lipase-related Protein 1-like | ↓ 6x | – | ↑ 4x | |
gi|687116092 | 1,317 | Lipase-like | ↓ 4x | – | ↑ 4x | |
gi|687125502 | 266 | Lipase | ↓ 5x | – | – |
Dash, no significant change; ↑, increased; ↓, decreased.
Discussion
Physiological differences in gut pH with different diets
It has been suggested that larval gut pH may play a role in resistance to pathogens and that gut pH can be significantly altered by diet (Keating et al., 1990). However, while our data supported the idea that diet can influence gut pH levels, as observed between diet treatments (Figure 2), there was no evident relationship between these differences and the significant differences in the susceptibility to the virus in T. ni larvae reared on different diets. Larvae reared on potato and artificial diet had an alkaline pH in the midgut well within the 9–11 range reported for most lepidopteran larvae (Dow, 1992), while those raised on cabbage had a less alkaline pH, possibly due to the high ascorbic acid content of cabbage. However, despite having a significantly lower gut pH, larvae fed cabbage were not the most susceptible to the virus, having an LD50 in between those reared on artificial diet and potato (Figure 1). The lack of effect may be related to the fact that the pH remained above 8, which is sufficiently alkaline to dissolve OBs effectively (Martin and Martin, 1983; Felton and Duffey, 1991).
Morphological and transcriptional differences in T. ni midgut and PM
Our results suggest that the different susceptibility of larvae reared on different treatments are the result of changes in the PM structure induced by diet, especially in the anterior end of the midgut where most AcMNPV baculovirus infections in T. ni occur (Javed et al., 2016). Larvae reared on artificial diet, the most susceptible to the baculovirus, not only had thin (≤1 μm) and fragile PMs, they had high levels of chitinase transcripts (Table 1), the products of which would actively degrade chitin structures like the PM. Thus, such a thin PM would not provide a very effective barrier against viral infection. In comparison, while the PM of larvae reared on cabbage, a preferred host plant, was also thin (≤1 μm), it was more uniform and dense than that seen in larvae fed artificial diet. Furthermore, the lower transcript levels of chitinases observed in the midgut of these insects would result in less degradation of the PM, which could lower the susceptibility to the baculovirus. The LD50 for larvae raised on potato, a non-preferred host plant laden with defensive biologically active secondary metabolites (Friedman, 2006), was higher than that for the other two treatments. This could be explained, at least in part by the fact that these larvae had thicker and less organized layers in the PM and the lowest chitinase and chitin deacetylase transcript levels. In addition the PM of larvae reared on potato also had more microvesicles (Figure 4), consistent with repair/reinforcement, as microvesicle membranes become partially soluble in alkaline pH and, when close to the intestinal lumen, release their contents which become incorporated into the PM (Eisemann and Binnington, 1994; Terra, 2001). The proposed relationships between diet chemistry and the corresponding effects on 4th instar T. ni PM morphology, chitinase gene expression regulation, and susceptibility to baculovirus are summarized in Figure 6.
Other potential modulators of the PM are the levels of ecdysone- and JH-induced gene expression in the midgut environment, through resulting changes to synthesis of their corresponding protein products. This is because ecdysone and JH work antagonistically to coordinate molting, a process during which the insect's chitin content is drastically altered (Truman and Riddiford, 2002). For example ecdysone induces molting, which is correlated with a thickening of the PM (Toprak et al., 2014), and larvae reared on potato had increased transcript levels of 20-hydroxyecdysone receptor and reduced levels of those for ecdysone oxidase. The latter catalyzes the conversion of ecdysone into 3-dehydroecdysone, diverting it from being processed into the active form, 20-hydroxyecdysone, which acts on ecdysone receptors to stimulate molting (Takeuchi et al., 2005). Thus differential expression of both gene groups could result in a PM with morphological characteristics of a molting, rather than a feeding, larva.
Detoxification gene responses to plant allelochemicals
The midgut's ability to detoxify plant toxins is an essential characteristic that allows insects, especially generalist species, to cope with a diversity of secondary plant compounds. Many cytochrome P450s are important enzymes in the functionalization step of detoxification (Stevens et al., 2000; Cianfrogna et al., 2002; Li et al., 2002). Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) convert lipophilic xenobiotics into hydrophilic compounds for excretion or sequestration (Francis et al., 2005; Després et al., 2007) while UDP-glucosyl transferases (UGTs) detoxify benzoxazinoids by conjugation with a sugar (Wouters et al., 2014). All three major detoxifying enzyme families were represented in the top 50 contigs with the biggest changes in midgut transcript levels between larvae reared on potatoes and cabbage (Supplementary Table 6), a pattern that was much more pronounced than when comparing the midgut results of larvae reared on artificial diet with either of the host plants (Supplementary Tables 7, 8). These detoxifying enzyme genes were predominantly downregulated in midguts of potato-raised larvae. A similar response was found in a comparison of midgut transcriptomes of T. ni larvae fed on tomato (Solanaceae) or Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) (Herde and Howe, 2014), two different plant species from the same families we used in this study. Herde and Howe (2014) hypothesized that anti-nutritive proteins found in Solanaceae elicit large-scale remodeling of digestive enzymes and that the metabolic costs associated with digestive flexibility constrain an insect's ability to detoxify secondary metabolites when feeding on plants using this defensive strategy. However, it is difficult to isolate the relative importance of such effects on insect health from those resulting from the thickened PM, as a thicker PM could also reduce digestion and result in decreased nutrition (Plymale et al., 2008), but in nature both probably play a role.
Conclusions
We found that diet affects the susceptibility of T. ni larvae to AcMNPV virus infection and this would appear to be mediated through alterations to the structure of the PM and not through changes to midgut pH. Examination of gene expression in the midgut using RNA-seq showed many changes in gene expression in larvae raised on potato compared with those raised on cabbage or artificial diet, most noticeably with respect to lowered transcript levels of chitinase and chitin deacetylase genes. This could explain the thickened and multi-layered PM seen in these larvae, which could provide a more effective barrier to baculovirus infection. These changes in gene expression provide leads for further experiments, using directed approaches such as RNA interference to selectively silence individual candidate genes, to identify the specific mechanisms involved.
Author contributions
EC and CD: conceived and designed the experiments; EC, DK, and MO: performed the experiments; MO and ME: contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools; EC, CD, and JM: wrote the manuscript; DK and ME: edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final document.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. The authors would like to thank: Dr. Richard Gardiner and Ms. Karen Nygard (the Biotron facility at the University of Western Ontario)—for use and training of microscopy processing and imaging machinery, Dr. Brent J. Sinclair (University of Western Ontario) and Dr. Aiming Wang (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) for advice and comments throughout the duration of this study, and Ms. Emine Kaplanoglu and Mr. Patrick Chapman (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) for their bioinformatics assistance.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2018.01348/full#supplementary-material
NCBI Sequence Read Archive submissions can be found under accession SRP124718.
References
- Adang M. J., Spence K. D. (1981). Surface morphology of peritrophic membrane formation in the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Cell Tissue Res. 218, 141–147. 10.1007/BF00210100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adkisson P. L., Vanderzant E. S., Bull D. L., Allison W. E. (1960). A wheat germ medium for rearing the pink bollworm. J. Econ. Entomol. 53, 759–762. 10.1093/jee/53.5.759 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Agrawal A. A., Kurashige N. S. (2003). A role for isothiocyanates in plant resistance against the specialist herbivore Pieris rapae. J. Chem. Ecol. 29, 1403–1415. 10.1023/A:1024265420375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benjamini Y., Yekutieli D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat. 29, 1165–1188. 10.1214/aos/1013699998 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brodersen G., Johns R., Lapointe R., Thumbi D., Thurston G., Lucarotti C. J., et al. (2012). Larval diet prior to and following virus ingestion influences the efficacy of two nucleopolyhedroviruses in whitemarked tussock moth (Orgyia leucostigma) caterpillars. Can. Entomol. 144, 447–457. 10.4039/tce.2012.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cianfrogna J., Zangerl A., Berenbaum M. (2002). Dietary and developmental influences on induced detoxification in an oligophage. J. Chem. Ecol. 28, 1349–1364. 10.1023/A:1016292317948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clem R. J., Passarelli A. L. (2013). Baculoviruses: sophisticated pathogens of insects. PLOS Pathog. 9:e1003729. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cory J. S., Hoover K. (2006). Plant-mediated effects in insect-pathogen interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 278–286. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox C. (1990). Fieller's theorem, the likelihood and the Delta method. Biometrics 46, 709–718. 10.2307/2532090 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Després L., David J. P., Gallet C. (2007). The evolutionary ecology of insect resistance to plant chemicals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 298–307. 10.1016/j.tree.2007.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dow J. A. (1992). pH gradients in lepidopteran midgut. J. Exp. Biol. 172:355–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duffey S. S., Hoover K., Bonning B., Hammock B. D. (1995). The impact of host plant on the efficacy of baculoviruses, in Reviews in Pesticide Toxicology, eds Roe M., Kuhr R. (Raleigh, NC: CTI Toxicology Communications; ), 137–275. [Google Scholar]
- Eisemann C. H., Binnington K. C. (1994). The peritrophic membrane: its formation, structure, chemical composition and permeability in relation to vaccination against ectoparasitic arthropods. Int. J. Parasitol. 24, 15–26. 10.1016/0020-7519(94)90055-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felton G., Duffey S. S. (1991). Reassessment of the role of gut alkalinity and detergency in insect herbivory. J. Chem. Ecol. 17, 1821–1836. 10.1007/BF00993731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francis F., Vanhaelen N., Haubruge E. (2005). Glutathione S-transferases in the adaptation to plant secondary metabolites in the Myzus persicae aphid. Arch. Insect Biochem. 58, 166–174. 10.1002/arch.20049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedman M. (2006). Potato glycoalkaloids and metabolites: roles in the plant and in the diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 8655–8681. 10.1021/jf061471t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Granados R. R., Lawler K. A. (1981). In vivo pathway of Autographa californica baculovirus invasion and infection. Virology 108, 297–308. 10.1016/0042-6822(81)90438-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grubb C. D., Abel S. (2006). Glucosinolate metabolism and its control. Trends Plant Sci. 11, 78–100. 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harper M. S., Granados R. R. (1999). Peritrophic membrane structure and formation of larval Trichoplusia ni with an investigation on the secretion patterns of a PM mucin. Tissue Cell 31, 202–211. 10.1054/tice.1999.0023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hegedus D. D., Toprak U., Erlandson M. (2016). Chapter 3: Lepidopteran peritrophic matrix, composition, function, and formation, in Short Views on Insect Genomics and Proteomics, Entomology in Focus 4, ed Raman C. (New York, NY: Springer International Publishing; ). [Google Scholar]
- Herde M., Howe G. A. (2014). Host plant-specific remodeling of midgut physiology in the generalist insect herbivore Trichoplusia ni. Insect Biochem. Mol. 50, 58–67. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holm S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
- Ianowski J. P., Christensen R. J., O'Donnell M. J. (2002). Intracellular ion activities in Malpighian tubule cells of Rhodnius prolixus: Evaluation of Na+-K+-2Cl− cotransport across the basolateral membrane. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 1645–1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ianowski J. P., O'Donnell M. J. (2004). Basolateral ion transport mechanisms during fluid secretion by Drosophila Malpighian tubules: Na+ recycling, Na+:K+:2Cl− cotransport and Cl− conductance. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 2599–2609. 10.1242/jeb.01058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Javed M. A., Coutu C., Theilmann D. A., Erlandson M. A., Hegedus D. D. (2017). Proteomics analysis of Trichoplusia ni midgut epithelial cell brush border membrane vesicles. Insect Sci. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/1744-7917.12547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Javed M. A., Harris S., Willis L. G., Theilmann D. A., Donly B. C., Erlandson M. A., et al. (2016). Microscopic investigation of AcMNPV infection in the Trichoplusia ni midgut. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 141, 24–33. 10.1016/j.jip.2016.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keating S. T., Schultz J. C., Yendol W. G. (1990). The effect of diet on Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar) larval midgut pH, and its relationship with larval susceptibility to a baculovirus. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 56, 317–326. 10.1016/0022-2011(90)90118-P [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar P., Pandit S. S., Steppuhn A., Baldwin I. T. (2013). Natural history-driven, plant mediated RNAi-based study reveals CYP6B46's role in a nicotine-mediated antipredator herbivore defense. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 1245–1252. 10.1073/pnas.1314848111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lambrix V., Reichelt M., Mitchell-Olds T., Kleibenstein D. J., Gershenzon J. (2001). The Arabidopsis epithiospecifier protein promotes the hydrolysis of glucosinolates to nitriles and influences Trichoplusia ni herbivory. Plant Cell 13, 2793–2807. 10.1105/tpc.13.12.2793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X., Berenbaum M. R., Schuler M. A. (2002). Plant allelochemicals differentially regulate Helicoverpa zea cytochrome P450 genes. Insect Mol. Biol. 11, 343–351. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2002.00341.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin J. S., Martin M. M. (1983). Precipitation of ribulose-1,S-bis-phosphate carboxylase/oxygenase by tannic acid, quebracho, and oak foliage extracts. J. Chem. Ecol. 9, 285–294. 10.1007/BF00988046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mithen R. F., Dekker M., Verkerk R., Rabot S., Johnson I. T. (2000). The nutritional significance, biosynthesis, and bioavailability of glucosinolates in human foods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80, 967–984. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Plymale R., Grove M. J., Cox-Foster D., Ostiguy N., Hoover K. (2008). Plant mediated alteration of the peritrophic matrix and baculovirus infection in lepidopteran larvae. J. Insect Physiol. 54, 737–749. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ritz C., Baty F., Streibig J. C., Gerhard D. (2015). Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS ONE 10:e014621. 10.1371/journal.pone.0146021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarfraz R. M., Cervantes V., Myers J. H. (2011). The effect of host plant species on performance and movement behaviour of the cabbage looper Trichoplusia ni and their potential influences on infection by Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. Agric. Forest Entomol. 13, 157–164. 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00504.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz M., Glick D., Lowenenstein Y., Soreq H. (1995). Engineering of human cholinesterases explains and predicts diverse consequences of administration of various drugs and poisons. Pharmacol. Ther. 67, 283–322. 10.1016/0163-7258(95)00019-D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shikano I., Ericsson J. D., Cory J. S., Myers J. H. (2010). Indirect plant-mediated effects on insect immunity and disease resistance in a tritrophic system. Basic Appl. Ecol. 11, 15–22. 10.1016/j.baae.2009.06.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shivley S., Miller W. R. (2009). The use of HDMS (hexamethyldisilazane) to replace Critical Point Drying (CPD) in the preparation of tardigrades for SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) imaging. Trans Kansas Acad. Sci. 112, 198–200. 10.1660/062.112.0407 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sidak Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62, 626–633. 10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Spence K. D. (1991). Structure and physiology of the peritrophic membrane, in Physiology of the Insect Epidermis, eds Binnington K., Petnakaran A. (Melbourne, VIC: CSIRO; ), 77–93. [Google Scholar]
- Stevens J. L., Snyder M. J., Koener J. F., Feyereisen R. (2000). Inducible P450s of the CYP9 family from larval Manduca sexta midgut. Insect Biochem. Mol. 30, 559–568. 10.1016/S0965-1748(00)00024-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takeuchi H., Rigden D. J., Ebrahimi B., Turner P. C., Rees H. H. (2005). Regulation of ecdysteroid signalling during Drosophila development: identification characterization and modelling of ecdysone oxidase, an enzyme involved in control of ligand concentration. Biochem. J. 389, 637–645. 10.1042/BJ20050498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talalay P., Fahey J. W. (2001). Phytochemicals from cruciferous plants protect against cancer by modulating carcinogen metabolism. J. Nutr. 131, 3027S−3033S. 10.1093/jn/131.11.3027S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terra W. R. (2001). The origin and functions of the insect peritrophic membrane and peritrophic gel. Arch. Insect Biochem. 47, 47–61. 10.1002/arch.1036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toprak U., Hegedus D. D., Baldwin D., Coutu C., Erlandson M. (2014). Spatial and temporal synthesis of Mamestra configurata peritrophic matrix through a larval stadium. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 54, 89–97. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Truman J. W., Riddiford L. M. (2002). Endocrine insights into the evolution of metamorphosis in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 467–500. 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wadleigh R. W., Yu S. J. (1988). Detoxification of isothiocyanate allelochemicals by glutathione transferase in three lepidopteran species. J. Chem. Ecol. 14, 1279–1288. 10.1007/BF01019352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whiteman N. K., Gloss A. D., Sackton T. B., Groen S. C., Humphrey P. T., Lapoint R. T. (2012). Genes involved in the evolution of herbivory by a leaf-mining, drosophilid fly. Genome Biol. Evol. 4, 900–916. 10.1093/gbe/evs063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winde I., Wittstock U. (2011). Insect herbivore counter-adaptations to the plant glucosinolate-myrosinase system. Phytochemistry 72, 1566–1575. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woodham A. A. (1983). The nutritional evaluation of leaf protein concentrates, in Leaf Protein Concentrates, eds Telek L., Graham H. D. (Westport, CT: AVI Publishing Company; ), 415–433. [Google Scholar]
- Wouters F. C., Reichelt M., Glauser G., Bauer E., Erb M., Gershenzon J., et al. (2014). Reglucosylation of the benzoxazinoid DIMBOA with inversion of stereochemical configuration is a detoxification strategy in lepidopteran herbivores. Angew. Chem. 126, 11502–11506. 10.1002/ange.201406643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J., McCart C., Woods D. J., Terhzaz S., Greenwood K. G., Dow J. A. (2007). A Drosophila systems approach to xenobiotic metabolism. Physiol. Genomics 30, 223–231. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00018.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.