Skip to main content
Cell Transplantation logoLink to Cell Transplantation
. 2018 Sep 18;27(10):1469–1494. doi: 10.1177/0963689718795096

A Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Analysis of the Proteins Secreted by Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Yoshiki Nakashima 1, Saifun Nahar 2, Chika Miyagi-Shiohira 1, Takao Kinjo 3, Zensei Toyoda 3, Naoya Kobayashi 4, Issei Saitoh 5, Masami Watanabe 6, Jiro Fujita 2, Hirofumi Noguchi 1,
PMCID: PMC6180722  PMID: 30226075

Abstract

Liquid chromatography using a tandem mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) is a method of proteomic analysis. A shotgun analysis by LC-MS/MS comprehensively identifies proteins from tissues and cells with high resolution. The hepatic function of mice with acute hepatitis following the intraperitoneal administration of CCL4 was improved by the tail vein administration of the culture conditional medium (CM) of human mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue (hMSC-AT). In this study, a secreted protein expression analysis of hMSC-AT was performed using LC-MS/MS; 128 proteins were identified. LC-MS/MS showed that 106 new functional proteins and 22 proteins (FINC, PAI1, POSTN, PGS2, TIMP1, AMPN, CFAH, VIME, PEDF, SPRC, LEG1, ITGBL, ENOA, CSPG2, CLUS, IBP4, IBP7, PGS1, IBP2, STC2, CTHR1, CD9) were previously reported in hMSC-AT-CMs. In addition, various proteins associated with growth (SAP, SEM7A, PTK7); immune system processes (CO1A2, CO1A1, CATB, TSP1, GAS6, PTX3, C1 S, SEM7A, G3P, PXDN, SRCRL, CD248, SPON2, ENPP2, CD109, CFAB, CATL1, MFAP5, MIF, CXCL5, ADAM9, CATK); and reproduction (MMP2, CATB, FBLN1, SAP, MFGM, GDN, CYTC) were identified in hMSC-AT-CMs. These results indicate that a comprehensive expression analysis of proteins by LC-MS/MS is useful for investigating new factors associated with cellular components, biological processes, and molecular functions.

Keywords: Human mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue (hMSC-AT), acute hepatitis, conditional medium (CM), LC-MS/MS analysis

Introduction

The clinical application of liver cell therapy using stem cells has great significance. The liver can develop acute hepatitis or chronic liver failure due to the influence of factors such as drugs, xenobiotics, and viruses. Eventually, chronic hepatitis and fibrosis develop and the ability to regenerate hepatocytes is lost1. At present, the only effective treatment is liver transplantation; however, liver transplantation is associated with problems such as rejection and limitation of donors. Thus, alternative approaches are necessary, and stem cells are attracting attention as a therapeutic approach. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) represent an outstanding candidate stem cell for clinical treatment. MSCs have been collected from various organs, including the bone marrow (BM)2, cord blood3, placenta4. and adipose tissue (AT)5,6. Currently, attention is being given to adipose tissue as a source of MSCs for regenerative medicine57. Adipose tissue contains large amounts of MSCs (adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs)) and is considered to be a useful source of cells for clinical application because of its fast proliferation and high cellular activity.

In recent years, treatment methods using conditional medium of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC-CM) have been reported811. Because the culture supernatant does not contain cellular components, there is a high possibility that they will have clinical applications because of the extremely low risk of complications (i.e. pulmonary embolism) associated with the administration of cells in the blood and canceration of the administered cells. Proteins are important components in the regulation of cellular functions such as cell proliferation, cell death, and the immune function, and in the induction of differentiation. Thus, proteomic analyses, which detect the expression of protein, are considered to be a powerful tool for analyzing the system biology and exploring the active factors in MSC-CMs.

Liquid chromatography by tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is an analytical chemistry technique that combines the physical separation capability of liquid chromatography (or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)) and the mass spectrometric ability of mass spectrometry12. MS involves a mass separation step; the ionized component is detected as it is. In soft ionization methods such as electrospray ionization (ESI)1315, molecular weight-related ions are mainly detected (mass spectrum). In tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), specific ions are first selected by a mass separator (MS1). In addition, the fragmentation of ions occurs due to the collision of ions with inert gas. The fragment ions obtained are separated and detected by a second mass separator (MS2) (product ion spectrum). Molecular weight-related ions are mainly detected by MS, and precursor ions and product ions are detected by MS/MS. LC-MS/MS allows for the identification of proteins fragmented into peptides by trypsin. Our protocol was based on the bottom-up strategy of a proteomic MS analysis. Enzymatic digestion was carried out using the Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) method with trypsin as protease16. The peptide mixture was treated with ZipTip and then on-line coupled nano-liquid chromatography (nano LC) was performed using an Orbitrap Elite Hybrid Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan). In addition, an on-line LC-MS/MS system for quantitative proteomics based on data-dependent protein IDs and shotgun-based quantitative proteomics methods was used.

This study was performed to identify functional protein components in the conditional medium of human mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue (hMSC-AT-CM) using LC-MS/MS. The identification of the secreted protein components of hMSC-AT and protein components with therapeutic effects is expected to be useful for future cell therapy.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

The MSCGM-CD™ Mesencymal Stem Cell Growth Medium BulletKit™ was obtained from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland). hMSC-ATs (46-year-old Caucasian female) (PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) were cultured. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from BioWest (Nuaille, France). D-MEM/Ham’s F-12 medium was obtained from Wako (Osaka, Japan). Plastic dishes were obtained from TPP (Trasadingen, Switzerland). All other materials used were of the highest commercial grade.

Flow Cytometry

Cell flow cytometry was performed using a NovoCyte® Flow Cytometer (ACEA Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, hMSC-ATs (1 × 105 cells) were mixed into 0.5 mL of Perfusion Solution (CORNING, Manassas, VA, USA). Each antibody (1/100 of the volume) was added to the cell admixture, which was then incubated on ice for 30 minutes. After washing the cells with Brilliant Stain Buffer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) measurement was carried out. The following primary antibodies were used: APC Mouse Anti-Human CD29, BV421 Mouse Anti-Human CD44, BV421 Mouse IgG2b κ Isotype Control, APC Mouse IgG1 κ Isotype Control (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); FITC anti-human CD90 (Thy1) Antibody, FITC Mouse IgG1 κ Isotype Ctrl Antibody, PerCP anti-human CD34 Antibody, PerCP Mouse IgG1 κ Isotype Ctrl Antibody, PE/Cy7 anti-human CD45 Antibody, and PE/Cy7 Mouse IgG1 κ Isotype Ctrl Antibody (BioLegend, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Animal Care

All experimental protocols were in accordance with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals set by Research Laboratory Center, Faculty of Medicine and the Institute for Animal Experiments, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus (Okinawa, Japan). The experimental protocol was approved by the Committee on Animal Experiments of University of the Ryukyus (permit number: A2017101). C57BL/6 male mice (8-week-old; Japan SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) were maintained under controlled temperature (23 ± 2°C) and light conditions (lights on from 08:30–20:30). Animals were fed standard rodent chow pellets with ad libitum access to water. All efforts were made to minimize the suffering of the animals.

Preparation of the Mouse Model of Acute Liver Failure

Carbon tetrachloride (CCL4) (Wako 035-01273) diluted with olive oil (Wako 150-00276) was administered intraperitoneally (0.5 mL/kg) to 8-week-old C57BL/6 male mice as a mouse model of acute liver failure. Nine mice each were used for both treated and control animals. At 4 h after the administration of CCL4, 20-fold concentrated culture supernatant was administered via the mouse tail vein (100 μl of PBS and hMSC-AT-CM solution was administered via the mouse tail vein). Blood and liver tissues were sampled at 24 h after the administration of CCL4. Under anesthesia, approximately 500 μL of blood was collected from the descending aorta using a 1 mL syringe (22 G injection needle) passed through heparin, centrifuged (150 g, 30 min, 4°C) after the coagulation, 100 μL of blood was obtained. Four hundred microliters of physiological saline were added to 100 μL of serum and diluted, and the blood components were analyzed (commissioned to SRL). The liver was fixed in formalin after sampling and HE staining was performed after the preparation of tissue sections. Fragmented DNA generated during apoptosis was detected by a TdT-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay to identify apoptotic cells in the liver tissue. TUNEL staining was performed using the In Situ Apoptosis Detection kit (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) and visualized using DAB as the chromogen. The Ki67 protein present in the nucleus of cells in G1, S, G2, M cycles (cell growth phase) was detected by using immunostaining in order to identify cells in the growth phase in liver tissue. The reagent Histofine Simple Stain MAX PO (Rubbit) (NICHIRE BIOSCIENCES INC., Tokyo, Japan) and anti-Ki67 antibody (ab 15580) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used.

Preparations of hMSC-AT-CMs for Animal Studies and the Analysis of the Protein Expression by LC-MS/MS

The hMSCs used in this study are limited to three to five passages in order to match the cell nature with clinically used hMSCs. Two milliliters of DMEM/F12 medium was added to hMSC-AT (1 × 106 cells) and cultured for 48 h to prepare hMSC-AT-CMs; this was concentrated to 1/20 of the original volume using a 10 k filter, 100 μL was injected per mouse. The 20-fold concentrated hMSC-AT-CM was serous and successfully passed through a 32 G injection needle (Fig. 1(a)). Two milliliters of clinical Xeno-free medium (MSCGM-CD mesenchymal stem cell BulletKit [Lonza]) was added to hMSC-AT (1 × 106 cells) and cultured for 48 h to prepare hMSC-AT-CMs and then concentrated to 1/20 of the original volume using a 10 k filter, after which the component proteins were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Twenty-fold concentrated hMSC-AT-CM was subjected to LC-MS/MS. If the medium’s albumin concentration is high, the accuracy of a protein analysis decreases. Thus, after washing these cells with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), they were cultured in albumin-free medium and the resulting culture supernatant was used for this study (Fig. 1(b)). One hundred twenty-eight proteins were identified from the hMSC-AT-CM samples; the identified proteins are listed in Table 1. In this study, DMEM/F12 (containing 0% FBS) was used to prepare hMSC-AT-CMs to be administered to mice, due to the difficulty of accurately observing the therapeutic effect of hMSC-AT-secreted protein when the protein component of clinical Xeno-free medium rich in growth factor proteins is concentrated.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Illustration of the preparation of conditional medium for hMSC-AT. (a) The procedure for administering 100 μL hMSC-AT-CM concentrate to the tail vein of the mouse. (b) The procedure for preparing the hMSC-AT-CM concentrate for the LC-MS/MS analysis.

Table 1.

Details of the hMSC-AT Secreted Protein Identified.

UniProt/SWISS- PROT ID Description Protein scorea Protein mass (kDa) pIb Num. of matchesc Num. of significant matchesd Num. of sequencese Num. of significant sequencesf Num. of unique sequencesg Sequence coverageh emPAIi
FINC_HUMAN Fibronectin 17,045 262,460 5.46 1127 667 120 99 53 0.67 7.1
BGH3_HUMAN Transforming growth factor-beta-induced protein ig-h3 5287 74,634 7.62 161 135 26 18 26 0.61 2.83
CO6A1_HUMAN Collagen alpha-1(VI) chain 4997 108,462 5.26 168 126 33 25 33 0.49 1.83
CO6A3_HUMAN Collagen alpha-3(VI) chain 4217 343,457 6.26 224 169 85 66 85 0.41 1.32
CO1A2_HUMAN Collagen alpha-2(I) chain 3164 129,235 9.08 209 129 51 38 46 0.63 2.65
PAI1_HUMAN Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 2264 45,031 6.68 95 59 19 12 19 0.56 2.64
FSTL1_HUMAN Follistatin-related protein 1 1973 34,963 5.39 50 38 13 10 13 0.53 2.69
POSTN_HUMAN Periostin 1936 93,255 7.27 146 83 41 32 41 0.62 4.49
MMP2_HUMAN 72 kDa type IV collagenase 1619 73,835 5.26 106 66 25 23 15 0.65 3.35
CO1A1_HUMAN Collagen alpha-1(I) chain 1576 138,857 5.6 206 87 36 28 27 0.44 1.47
FBN1_HUMAN Fibrillin-1 1557 312,022 4.81 95 54 46 27 43 0.29 0.44
FBN2_HUMAN Fibrillin-2 1479 314,558 4.73 106 54 55 25 52 0.38 0.4
CATB_HUMAN Cathepsin B 1327 37,797 5.88 46 31 12 9 12 0.56 2.35
LAMB1_HUMAN Laminin subunit beta-1 1302 197,909 4.83 62 43 29 19 29 0.35 0.5
PGS2_HUMAN Decorin 1223 39,722 8.75 28 18 9 4 9 0.36 0.69
CO6A2_HUMAN Collagen alpha-2(VI) chain 1144 108,512 5.85 79 56 23 14 23 0.32 0.78
LTBP1_HUMAN Latent-transforming growth factor beta-binding protein 1 1125 186,673 5.63 77 53 31 21 22 0.31 0.71
TSP1_HUMAN Thrombospondin-1 1023 129,300 4.71 56 39 22 14 20 0.28 0.68
TIMP1_HUMAN Metalloproteinase inhibitor 1 961 23,156 8.46 58 43 7 6 7 0.54 2.48
AMPN_HUMAN Aminopeptidase N 896 109,471 5.31 23 17 10 5 10 0.17 0.21
CO3A1_HUMAN Collagen alpha-1(III) chain 868 138,479 6.21 57 30 24 14 22 0.24 0.57
CFAH_HUMAN Complement factor H 790 139,005 6.21 41 28 20 15 20 0.3 0.57
LTBP2_HUMAN Latent-transforming growth factor beta-binding protein 2 765 194,923 5.06 54 28 26 15 26 0.26 0.38
CO5A1_HUMAN Collagen alpha-1(V) chain 664 183,447 4.94 32 19 12 6 11 0.12 0.15
LG3BP_HUMAN Galectin-3-binding protein 640 65,289 5.13 29 21 10 7 10 0.32 0.56
LAMC1_HUMAN Laminin subunit gamma-1 590 177,489 5.01 54 31 28 15 28 0.3 0.42
MFAP2_HUMAN Microfibrillar-associated protein 2 579 20,812 4.86 11 10 3 3 3 0.21 0.81
VIME_HUMAN Vimentin 531 53,619 5.06 36 16 14 7 14 0.37 0.86
PCOC1_HUMAN Procollagen C-endopeptidase enhancer 1 522 47,942 7.41 47 23 17 11 17 0.63 1.84
COBA1_HUMAN Collagen alpha-1(XI) chain 513 180,954 5.06 26 16 12 4 11 0.17 0.12
PEDF_HUMAN Pigment epithelium-derived factor 497 46,283 5.97 15 13 9 7 9 0.3 0.88
SPRC_HUMAN SPARC 435 34,610 4.73 40 25 13 9 6 0.63 2.32
GAS6_HUMAN Growth arrest-specific protein 6 433 79,625 5.84 19 12 9 5 9 0.24 0.3
LEG1_HUMAN Galectin-1 420 14,706 5.34 12 11 3 3 3 0.32 1.31
OLFL3_HUMAN Olfactomedin-like protein 3 390 45,981 6.17 24 14 10 6 10 0.36 0.72
PTX3_HUMAN Pentraxin-related protein PTX3 381 41,949 4.94 33 21 12 10 12 0.42 1.7
LAMA2_HUMAN Laminin subunit alpha-2 364 343,684 6.01 39 13 27 8 27 0.17 0.1
ITGBL_HUMAN Integrin beta-like protein 1 361 53,884 5.39 24 15 14 9 14 0.38 1.01
AEBP1_HUMAN Adipocyte enhancer-binding protein 1 361 130,847 5.05 9 7 5 4 5 0.07 0.14
CO5A2_HUMAN Collagen alpha-2(V) chain 355 144,821 6.07 18 10 9 4 8 0.12 0.12
FBLN1_HUMAN Fibulin-1 352 77,162 5.07 20 12 13 9 6 0.29 0.63
ENOA_HUMAN Alpha-enolase 350 47,139 7.01 13 10 3 3 3 0.13 0.3
FBLN5_HUMAN Fibulin-5 341 50,147 4.58 22 13 9 6 9 0.34 0.94
LUM_HUMAN Lumican 311 38,405 6.16 35 12 11 5 11 0.37 0.72
DKK3_HUMAN Dickkopf-related protein 3 290 38,365 4.59 9 8 4 4 4 0.25 0.54
CO4A2_HUMAN Collagen alpha-2(IV) chain 285 167,449 8.89 11 8 4 3 4 0.05 0.08
CSPG2_HUMAN Versican core protein 282 372,590 4.43 24 11 17 9 17 0.1 0.11
SRPX_HUMAN Sushi repeat-containing protein SRPX 279 51,538 8.98 25 14 14 8 14 0.48 0.91
C1S_HUMAN Complement C1 s subcomponent 272 76,635 4.86 27 13 14 8 14 0.35 0.55
ECM1_HUMAN Extracellular matrix protein 1 268 60,635 6.25 39 16 17 9 17 0.41 0.86
NID1_HUMAN Nidogen-1 248 136,291 5.12 35 18 19 11 17 0.26 0.4
SAP_HUMAN Prosaposin 242 58,074 5.06 18 12 10 4 10 0.28 0.33
SEM7A_HUMAN Semaphorin-7A 229 74,776 7.57 21 12 15 10 15 0.37 0.85
CLUS_HUMAN Clusterin 225 52,461 5.89 9 7 4 3 4 0.18 0.27
LYOX_HUMAN Protein-lysine 6-oxidase 224 46,915 8.36 18 13 8 4 8 0.3 0.56
QSOX1_HUMAN Sulfhydryl oxidase 1 209 82,526 9.13 18 8 8 6 8 0.18 0.36
G3P_HUMAN Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 196 36,030 8.57 8 6 6 5 6 0.34 0.78
TICN1_HUMAN Testican-1 184 49,092 5.74 12 8 9 6 9 0.34 0.66
EMIL1_HUMAN EMILIN-1 177 106,601 5.07 9 5 7 4 7 0.15 0.17
WISP2_HUMAN WNT1-inducible-signaling pathway protein 2 168 26,807 8.32 11 4 5 2 5 0.35 0.36
TFPI1_HUMAN Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 164 34.992 8.61 24 3 2 1 2 0.13 0.13
PXDN_HUMAN Peroxidasin homolog 164 165,170 6.79 18 6 10 4 10 0.12 0.11
PGBM_HUMAN Basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan core protein 159 468,532 6.06 22 7 11 4 11 0.06 0.04
IBP4_HUMAN Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 149 27,915 6.81 16 6 10 5 10 0.52 1.1
VASN_HUMAN Vasorin 145 71,668 7.16 8 7 4 4 4 0.09 0.26
GPNMB_HUMAN Transmembrane glycoprotein NMB 141 63,882 6.17 5 4 2 1 2 0.06 0.07
SRCRL_HUMAN Soluble scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain-containing protein SSC5D 140 165,639 5.71 26 3 4 1 4 0.04 0.03
FBLN3_HUMAN EGF-containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1 138 54,604 4.95 21 9 10 4 10 0.32 0.36
PLTP_HUMAN Phospholipid transfer protein 137 54,705 6.53 8 4 4 2 4 0.16 0.16
PROF1_HUMAN Profilin-1 135 15,045 8.44 5 4 3 2 3 0.31 0.72
IBP7_HUMAN Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 134 29,111 8.25 12 7 5 3 5 0.3 0.53
PGS1_HUMAN Biglycan 133 41,628 7.16 10 4 6 3 6 0.27 0.35
NUCB1_HUMAN Nucleobindin-1 124 53,846 5.15 20 5 14 4 14 0.45 0.36
CD44_HUMAN CD44 antigen 119 81,487 5.13 8 4 3 1 3 0.08 0.05
AGRIN_HUMAN Agrin 114 217,092 6.01 10 4 7 4 7 0.09 0.08
MFGM_HUMAN xLactadherin 111 43,095 8.47 16 6 6 3 6 0.2 0.34
RCN1_HUMAN Reticulocalbin-1 111 38,866 4.86 3 2 1 1 1 0.06 0.11
FAM3C_HUMAN Protein FAM3C 109 24,665 8.52 3 3 1 1 1 0.07 0.18
CATZ_HUMAN Cathepsin Z 108 33,846 6.7 6 4 4 3 4 0.25 0.44
PDIA1_HUMAN Protein disulfide-isomerase 106 57,081 4.76 5 4 3 2 3 0.14 0.16
IBP2_HUMAN Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 104 34,791 7.48 7 4 5 3 5 0.27 0.43
TPP1_HUMAN Tripeptidyl-peptidase 1 103 61,210 6.01 3 2 2 1 2 0.08 0.07
GDN_HUMAN Glia-derived nexin 99 43,974 9.35 16 5 8 4 8 0.28 0.46
CD248_HUMAN Endosialin 93 80,807 5.18 5 4 3 3 3 0.09 0.17
SPON2_HUMAN Spondin-2 92 35,824 5.35 26 8 12 7 12 0.44 1.25
MARCS_HUMAN Myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate 91 31,536 4.47 3 2 2 1 2 0.1 0.3
LAMA1_HUMAN Laminin subunit alpha-1 90 336,867 5.93 17 3 11 3 11 0.08 0.04
SERPH_HUMAN Serpin H1 90 46,411 8.75 15 5 6 2 6 0.2 0.2
PLOD1_HUMAN Procollagen-lysine,2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1 84 83,497 6.47 12 4 9 3 9 0.18 0.16
CO4A1_HUMAN Collagen alpha-1(IV) chain 80 160,514 8.55 7 2 6 2 6 0.1 0.05
GOLM1_HUMAN Golgi membrane protein 1 79 45,306 4.91 10 4 6 2 6 0.19 0.2
ENPP2_HUMAN Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 2 78 98,930 7.14 11 6 8 4 8 0.17 0.18
LAMA4_HUMAN Laminin subunit alpha-4 77 202,397 5.89 15 3 11 3 11 0.11 0.06
TARSH_HUMAN Target of Nesh-SH3 77 118,569 9.48 7 3 6 2 6 0.08 0.07
PTK7_HUMAN Inactive tyrosine-protein kinase 7 75 118,317 6.67 3 2 3 2 3 0.04 0.07
SAP3_HUMAN Ganglioside GM2 activator 73 20,825 5.17 6 3 3 2 3 0.4 0.48
CD109_HUMAN CD109 antigen 72 161,587 5.59 12 1 6 1 6 0.06 0.03
PAMR1_HUMAN Inactive serine protease PAMR1 70 80,146 7.57 5 2 5 2 5 0.16 0.11
KPYM_HUMAN Pyruvate kinase PKM 68 57,900 7.96 7 3 4 3 4 0.16 0.24
PTGDS_HUMAN Prostaglandin-H2 D-isomerase 64 21,015 7.66 3 1 2 1 2 0.17 0.22
IBP6_HUMAN Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 6 64 25,306 8.15 3 2 3 2 3 0.25 0.39

a Protein score is calculated from the score of the peptide attributed to the protein; b pI: (Predicted) isoelectric point.; c Number of matches is spectrum number matched to protein#1; d Number of significant matches is spectrum number that matches protein and exceeds the identification criteria; e Number of sequences is number of peptides matched to protein#2; f Number of significant sequences is number of peptides exceeding the identification criteria matched to proteins; h Sequence coverage is the ratio of the total number of matched peptide residues to the total length of the protein; I Exponentially Modified Protein Abundance Index (http://www.matrixscience.com/help/quant_empai_help.html).

Real-time PCR and RT-PCR

Five microliters of a cell admixture (concentration, 1 × 107 cells/ml) was collected. RNA was prepared for a qPCR using a SuperPrep Cell Lysis and RT kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Quick Taq HS DyeMix was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Toyobo Co., Ltd.). Real-time PCR analyses were performed using a LightCycler 96 Real-Time PCR system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The FastStart Essential DAN Green Master (Roche) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An RT-PCR was performed using a GeneAtlas 482 thermal cycler (Astec Co., Ltd., Fukuoka, Japan). Images were recorded using an Aplegen® Omega Lum C (Gel Company, San Francisco, CA, USA), and procedures were performed using the primers listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Sequences of Primers used for the RT-PCR.

Gnens GenBank number Forward primer (5’-3’) Reverse primer (5’-3’) Product size (bp)
human CD29 NM_002211.3 CTGAAGACTATCCCATTGACCTCTA GCTAATGTAAGGCATCACAGTCTTT 179
human CD34 NM_001025109.1 CCTGCTCTCTTGTAATGATATAGCC GAGACTAGAACTGAGCTGTTTGTCC 227
human CD44 NM_000610.3 ACTAGTGTTCAAGTGCCTCTTGTTT GCCTCTTTTTGGGAATATCTAGAAG 227
human CD45 NM_001267798.1 TTCTTAGGGTAACAGAGGAGGAAAT ACAAATACTTCTGTGTCCAGAAAGG 167
human HGF NM_000601.5 ACAGTCATAGCTGAAGTAAGTGTGT GCAGGATACATGGTGAAGAGAAATG 511
human SCAI NM_001144877.2 CTTCACTCGTATTGCTGTGTCTCTA GCATTGCACGTATTTACTATCCTCT 183
human VEGFA NM_001025366.2 AAGTGGTGAAGTTCATGGATGTCTA AAGTACGTTCGTTTAACTCAAGCTG 558
human GAPDH NM_001256799.2 AGAAGTATGACAACAGCCTCAAGAT CCAAATTCGTTGTCATACCAGGAAA 544

Preparation of hMSC-AT

hMSC-ATs (46-year-old Caucasian female) were cultured (37°C, 5% CO2) on a coated 100-mm culture plate (TPP 93100). The passage of cells was performed every 3 to 4 days after reaching 80% confluence after sowing the cells. The cells were washed with PBS (calcium, magnesium-free), and hMSC-ATs were dissociated using a dissociation solution. Subculturing was carried out by plating on uncoated 100-mm culture plate. An MSCGM-CD mesenchymal stem cell BulletKit (Lonza 00190632) was used for the culture medium. Trypsin/EDTA (Lonza CC-3232) was used for the dissociation solution.

Preparation of Culture Supernatant

hMSC-ATs were cultured on a 100 mm culture plate using an MSCGM-CD mesenchymal stem cell BulletKit (the number of cells was 3 × 106/plate) until reaching 80% confluence. The cells were cultured for 24 h in D-MEM/Ham’s F-12 medium (Wako 4230795) containing 10% FBS, after which the cells were washed with PBS (calcium, magnesium-free); 2 ml of D-MEM/Ham’s F-12 medium was then added to 1 × 106 cells and the cells were cultured for 48 h. After 48 h, the culture supernatant was aspirated with a pipette and centrifuged (1500 g, 30 minutes, 4°C) to remove the cells. After the centrifugation of the medium, the supernatant was concentrated 20 times using Amicon Ultra-15, PLGC Ultracell-PL membrane, 10 kDa (UFC901008) (MERCK, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) and a concentrated solution of culture supernatant was obtained.

Protein Identification by a Nano LC-MS/MS Analysis

A protein solution of 2066 μg/ml was obtained from the concentrated solution of culture supernatant. Finally, 0.4 μg of protein was used for nanoLC-MS/MS. The samples were analyzed via nano LC using an UltiMate 3000 RSLC nano system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan) at the Support Center for Advanced Medical Sciences, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School by Ikuko Sagawa. In brief, protein-containing solutions were reduced with 10 mM DTT/8 M urea and Tris buffer containing 2 mM EDTA (pH 8.5), alkylated with 25 mM iodoacetamide/8 M Urea and Tris buffer containing 2 mM EDTA (pH 8.5), subsequently diluted with trypsin (pig-derived trypsin) and digested overnight at 37°C. Peptides were purified and concentrated by solid-phase extraction (SPE) in ZipTip µC18 pipette tips (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Nano LC-MS/MS was carried out using an UltiMate 3000 RSLC nano system. The reconstituted peptides were injected into an Acclaim PepMap C18 trap column (75 μm × 15 cm, 2 μm, C18) (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid. Solvent B was 80% acetonitrile/0.08% formic acid. The peptides were eluted in a 229-min gradient of 4% solvent B in solvent A to 90% solvent B in solvent A at 300 nl/min. Orbitrap Elite’s ionization method was set to Nanoflow-LC ESI, positive, and the capillary voltage was set to 1.7 kV. Tandem mass spectrometry was performed using the Proteome Discoverer software program, version 1.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan). Charge stated deconvolution and deisotoping were not performed.

Data Analyses

Database Searching

All raw data were searched against the SwissProt 2016-07 database using the Mascot 2.5.1 software program (Matrix Science, London, UK) (unknown version, 551705 entries). The peptide tolerance was set to 10 ppm, and the MS/MS tolerance was set to 0.6 Da. The false discovery rates (FDRs) were calculated for each of the samples using the following formula: FDR = (Ndecoy/Nreal+NDecoy) × 100. This is an indication of the percentage of the random or “false” peptide identifications in the raw data. The relative abundance of the proteins identified by LC-MS/MS was estimated by determining the protein abundance index (PAI) and the exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI). Visualized and validated complex LC-MS/MS proteomics experiments were performed using Scaffold (version 4.7.3, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR, USA – http://www.proteomesoftware.com/) to compare samples in order to identify biological relevance.

The Criteria for Protein Identification

The Scaffold software program was used to validate the MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at > 46.0% probability to achieve an FDR of < 1.0% by the Scaffold Local FDR algorithm. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at > 5.0% probability to achieve an FDR of < 1.0% and contained at least 2 identified peptides. Protein probabilities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm17. Proteins that contained similar peptides and could not be differentiated based on MS/MS alone were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony. Proteins that shared significant peptide evidence were grouped into clusters. A protein GO analysis was performed using the GO analysis function of the Scaffold 4 software program with imported data (goa_uniprot_all.gaf [downloaded 2016/10/14]) from the external GO Annotation Source database.

Results

The Characteristics and Cell Quality of hMSC-ATs

hMSC-ATs were cultured to an 80% confluent state using Clinical Xeno-free medium. We observed the absence of abnormalities in cell size, shape, and culture state with a normal microscope (Fig. 2(a)). Flow cytometry was performed using markers of hMSC-AT (CD 29, CD 44), hematopoietic stem cells (CD 34), and leukocytes (CD 45). Markers of CD29 and CD44 were expressed in hMSC-AT, while the expression of CD34 and CD45 was not detected (Fig. 2(b)). The expression of hMSC-AT markers (CD29, CD44), hematopoietic stem cells (CD34), and leukocytes (CD45) was examined by real-time PCR. CD29 and CD44 were expressed by hMSC-AT, while the expression of CD34 and CD45 was not detected (Fig. 2(c)). The PCR method was used to examine the mRNA expression levels of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a suppressor of cancer cell invasion (SCAI) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expressed in hMSC-AT. (Fig. 2(d)). hMSC-AT-CM was prepared using DMEM/F12 medium. Prior to concentrating hMSC-AT-CM to 1/20 using a 10 k filter, the protein concentration was measured using an ELISA (Fig. 1(a)). The expression of hMSC-AT secreted proteins was examined by an ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), which revealed that hMSC-AT secreted VEGFA proteins into the culture medium (control group: < 20 [N.D] ± 0.00 pg/ml, n = 3; hMSC group: 886.67 ± 28.93 pg/ml, n = 3) (Fig. 2(e)). hMSC-AT have been reported to secrete HGF9. In our experiments, we could not show the measurement because the detection limit of the ELISA (Otuka, Tokyo, Japan) to detect HGF (0.3 ng/ml) was high (control group: < 0.3 [N.D] ± 0.00 ng/ml, n = 3; hMSC group: < 0.3 ± 0.00 ng/ml, n = 3). We induced differentiation into adipocytes (Fig. 2(f), upper panels) and osteoblasts (Fig. 2(f), lower panel) using hMSC-AT. Mature adipocytes were stained with Oil Red O and mature osteoblasts were stained with alkaline phosphatase (Fig. 2(f), right panel). hMSC-ATs were cultured in three wells of a six-well plate. Adipocytes stained red with Oil Red O staining in all three wells and osteoblasts stained blue with alkaline phosphatase staining in all three wells were confirmed with a normal microscope.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The phenotype and differentiation potential of hMSC-AT in culture. (a) The morphological appearance of hMSC-AT on day 3. (b) The results of flow cytometry of the cell surface markers of hMSC-AT. (c) The results of real-time PCR to detect cell surface markers of hMSC-AT. The expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt method. The expression of the target gene was corrected by the expression of the housekeeping gene. The relative values are indicated. n = 1. (d) The results of an RT-PCR to evaluate the growth factor and cell surface markers mRNA expression of hMSC-AT. (e) The results of an ELISA to evaluate the growth factor protein expression of hMSC-AT-CM. (f) Representative images of adipocyte and osteocyte differentiation of hMSC-AT cultured in growth or differentiation medium.

hMSC-AT-CM Improves the Liver Function of Mice with Acute Liver Failure

CCL4 was intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered to mice to induce hepatic cell damage and model mice were prepared. The upper part of the photo shows the liver histology at 24 h after the administration of CCL4. The hepatocytes of the centrilobular region showed necrotic change. However, when hMSC-AT-CM was injected into the tail vein at 4 h after the administration of CCL4, the number of necrotic cells was reduced. Cells in the growth phase (shown in the panels of Ki67) and apoptotic cells (shown in the panels of the TUNEL assay) of liver tissue sections were detected. In mouse liver administered hMSC-AT-CM, the number of apoptotic cells widely observed in liver tissues was reduced by CCL4 administration. Furthermore, the apoptotic cells were localized to the interlobular vein in liver tissues treated with hMSC-AT-CM. Cells in the growth phase were observed around the cells showing apoptosis due to the administration of CCL4 (Fig. 3(a), left and middle panels). However, cells in the growth phase were uniformly observed in liver tissues treated with hMSC-AT-CM. Ki67 was expressed only in the nucleus, and cells in the proliferation phase had brown-stained nuclei. Mouse hepatocytes in the group treated with hMSC-AT-CM showed more nuclear-stained cells than those in the group treated with PBS, thus indicating that hMSC-AT-CM promoted hepatocyte proliferation (Fig. 3(a), right panel). We also counted the number of positively stained cells in images of TUNNEL-stained sections (× 100). The numbers of positively stained cells in the PBS and CM groups were 15.25 ± 3.96 and 10.00 ± 5.07, respectively (n = 4; P = 0.18) (Fig. 3(a), middle panels). We also counted the number of cells with positively stained nuclei on images of Ki67-stained sections (× 100). The numbers of cells with positively stained nuclei in the PBS and CM groups were 10.25 ± 4.23 and 90.75 ± 38.42, respectively (n = 4; ** P < 0.01) (Fig. 3(a), right panels). These results indicate that hMSC-AT-CM rapidly recovered because of the generation of new viable cells as the older cells died due to CCL4 administration (Fig. 3(a)).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The culture supernatant concentrate significantly improved the symptoms of acute liver failure caused by the administration of CCL4. (a) Micrographic image of H&E staining (left panel), TUNEL assay (middle panels) and tissue immunostaining of Ki67 (right panel) of liver specimens. Scale bar = 200 μm. (b) In the group to which the culture supernatant concentrate was administered, the total bilirubin (95%), AST (74%), ALT (57%), LD (28%), and ALP (83%) decreased in comparison with the group to which PBS was administered. The decrease in the ALT, LD, and ALP values was significant (** P < 0.01, n = 9).

Our experiments show that the administration of MSC-AT-CM from a single vein rapidly promoted the cellular proliferation of mouse hepatocytes. The proteins associated with a growth function (GO analysis), identified by the presence of MSC-AT-CM, were POSTN, SAP, SEM7A, PTK7 (Table 3). Of course, it is not possible to explain the proliferative effect of hepatocytes based on the presence of four proteins. Periostin, which is encoded by the POSTIN gene, has been reported as an extracellular factor that promotes hepatosteatosis18,19; however, many points about proteins with the ability to promote the cellular proliferation of hepatocytes remain unclear. P component (SAP) is a protein that is expressed in hepatocytes and secreted into serum, and is known to be involved in processes associated with immune regulation, such as the action of opsonins20. Whether SAP is involved in the cellular proliferation of hepatocytes is unknown. Semaphorin 7A (SEM7A) is known to contribute to TGF-β mediated hepatic fibrosis21. It is unknown whether SEM7A promotes hepatocyte cell proliferation. Thus, future studies should investigate whether the growth-associated proteins that are newly identified by GO analyses promote the cellular proliferation of hepatocytes with CCL4-induced impairment. At approximately 10 days of gestation, during the development of the liver, the hematopoietic cells flow from the aorta-gonad-mesonephros region (AGM region) and placenta, and the liver begins to function as a hematopoietic organ22. It has been clarified that HGF and various extracellular matrices produced by non-parenchymal cells promote the differentiation of hepatoblasts into hepatocytes during this period23. In addition, a recent theory suggests that the biliary tree functions as a source of liver and pancreatic stem cells and progenitor cells. It is known that VEGF is secreted by the biliary tree due as a stress response24. From these developmental perspectives, it can be hypothesized that the HGF and VEGF secreted by MSC-AT-CMs have an extremely strong promoting effect on hepatocyte proliferation.

Table 3.

Biological Process.

UniProt/SWISS-PROT ID Biological adhesion Biological regulation Cell killing Cellular process Developmental process Establishment of localization Growth Immune system process Localization Locomotion Metabolic process Multi-organism process Multicellular organismal process Pigmentation Reproduction Reproductive process Response to stimulus Rhythmic process Viral process
FINC_HUMAN FINC FINC FINC FINC FINC FINC FINC FINC FINC FINC FINC
BGH3_HUMAN
CO6A1_HUMAN CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1
CO6A3_HUMAN CO6A3 CO6A3 CO6A3 CO6A3 CO6A3 CO6A3
CO1A2_HUMAN CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2
PAI1_HUMAN PAI1 PAI1 PAI1 PAI1 PAI1 PAI1 PAI1 PAI1 PAI1
FSTL1_HUMAN FSTL1 FSTL1 FSTL1
POSTN_HUMAN POSTN POSTN POSTN POSTN POSTN POSTN POSTN
MMP2_HUMAN MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2
CO1A1_HUMAN CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1
FBN1_HUMAN FBN1 FBN1 FBN1 FBN1 FBN1 FBN1 FBN1 FBN1
FBN2_HUMAN FBN2 FBN2 FBN2 FBN2 FBN2
CATB_HUMAN CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB
LAMB1_HUMAN LAMB1 LAMB1 LAMB1 LAMB1 LAMB1 LAMB1 LAMB1
PGS2_HUMAN PGS2 PGS2 PGS2 PGS2 PGS2 PGS2 PGS2 PGS2 PGS2
CO6A2_HUMAN CO6A2 CO6A2 CO6A2 CO6A2 CO6A2
LTBP1_HUMAN LTBP1 LTBP1 LTBP1 LTBP1 LTBP1 LTBP1
TSP1_HUMAN TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1
TIMP1_HUMAN TIMP1 TIMP1 TIMP1 TIMP1 TIMP1 TIMP1 TIMP1
AMPN_HUMAN
CO3A1_HUMAN CO3A1 CO3A1 CO3A1 CO3A1 CO3A1 CO3A1 CO3A1
CFAH_HUMAN CFAH CFAH CFAH CFAH
LTBP2_HUMAN LTBP2 LTBP2 LTBP2 LTBP2 LTBP2
CO5A1_HUMAN CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1
LG3BP_HUMAN LG3BP LG3BP LG3BP LG3BP LG3BP LG3BP
LAMC1_HUMAN LAMC1 LAMC1 LAMC1 LAMC1 LAMC1 LAMC1
MFAP2_HUMAN MFAP2 MFAP2 MFAP2
VIME_HUMAN VIME VIME VIME VIME VIME VIME VIME
PCOC1_HUMAN PCOC1 PCOC1 PCOC1 PCOC1
COBA1_HUMAN COBA1 COBA1 COBA1 COBA1 COBA1
PEDF_HUMAN PEDF PEDF PEDF PEDF PEDF PEDF PEDF PEDF
SPRC_HUMAN SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC
GAS6_HUMAN GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6
LEG1_HUMAN LEG1 LEG1 LEG1 LEG1 LEG1 LEG1
OLFL3_HUMAN OLFL3 OLFL3
PTX3_HUMAN PTX3 PTX3 PTX3 PTX3 PTX3 PTX3
LAMA2_HUMAN LAMA2 LAMA2 LAMA2 LAMA2 LAMA2 LAMA2 LAMA2
ITGBL_HUMAN
AEBP1_HUMAN AEBP1 AEBP1 AEBP1 AEBP1 AEBP1
CO5A2_HUMAN CO5A2 CO5A2 CO5A2 CO5A2 CO5A2 CO5A2
FBLN1_HUMAN FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1
ENOA_HUMAN ENOA ENOA ENOA ENOA ENOA ENOA ENOA
FBLN5_HUMAN FBLN5 FBLN5 FBLN5 FBLN5 FBLN5
LUM_HUMAN LUM LUM LUM LUM LUM LUM
DKK3_HUMAN DKK3 DKK3 DKK3 DKK3 DKK3
CO4A2_HUMAN CO4A2 CO4A2 CO4A2 CO4A2 CO4A2 CO4A2
CSPG2_HUMAN CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2
SRPX_HUMAN SRPX SRPX SRPX SRPX SRPX SRPX SRPX
C1S_HUMAN C1S C1S C1S C1S
ECM1_HUMAN ECM1 ECM1 ECM1 ECM1 ECM1 ECM1 ECM1
NID1_HUMAN NID1 NID1 NID1 NID1 NID1
SAP_HUMAN SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP
SEM7A_HUMAN SEM7A SEM7A SEM7A SEM7A SEM7A SEM7A SEM7A SEM7A SEM7A
CLUS_HUMAN CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS
LYOX_HUMAN LYOX LYOX LYOX LYOX LYOX
QSOX1_HUMAN QSOX1 QSOX1 QSOX1 QSOX1 QSOX1
G3P_HUMAN G3P G3P G3P G3P G3P
TICN1_HUMAN TICN1 TICN1 TICN1 TICN1 TICN1 TICN1 TICN1 TICN1
EMIL1_HUMAN EMIL1
WISP2_HUMAN WISP2 WISP2 WISP2 WISP2
TFPI1_HUMAN TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1
PXDN_HUMAN PXDN PXDN PXDN PXDN PXDN
PGBM_HUMAN PGBM PGBM PGBM PGBM
IBP4_HUMAN IBP4 IBP4 IBP4 IBP4 IBP4 IBP4
VASN_HUMAN VASN VASN VASN VASN
GPNMB_HUMAN GPNMB GPNMB GPNMB GPNMB GPNMB GPNMB GPNMB
SRCRL_HUMAN SRCRL SRCRL SRCRL SRCRL SRCRL SRCRL SRCRL SRCRL
FBLN3_HUMAN FBLN3 FBLN3 FBLN3 FBLN3 FBLN3 FBLN3
PLTP_HUMAN PLTP PLTP PLTP PLTP PLTP PLTP
PROF1_HUMAN PROF1 PROF1 PROF1 PROF1 PROF1 PROF1
IBP7_HUMAN IBP7 IBP7 IBP7 IBP7 IBP7 IBP7 IBP7 IBP7 IBP7
PGS1_HUMAN PGS1 PGS1 PGS1 PGS1 PGS1
NUCB1_HUMAN NUCB1 NUCB1
CD44_HUMAN CD44
AGRIN_HUMAN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN
MFGM_HUMAN MFGM MFGM MFGM MFGM MFGM MFGM MFGM MFGM MFGM MFGM MFGM MFGM
RCN1_HUMAN RCN1 RCN1
FAM3C_HUMAN FAM3C FAM3C FAM3C FAM3C FAM3C
CATZ_HUMAN CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ
PDIA1_HUMAN PDIA1 PDIA1 PDIA1 PDIA1
IBP2_HUMAN IBP2 IBP2 IBP2 IBP2 IBP2 IBP2 IBP2 IBP2 IBP2
TPP1_HUMAN TPP1 TPP1 TPP1 TPP1 TPP1 TPP1
GDN_HUMAN GDN GDN GDN GDN GDN GDN GDN GDN GDN GDN
CD248_HUMAN CD248 CD248 CD248 CD248 CD248 CD248 CD248
SPON2_HUMAN SPON2 SPON2 SPON2 SPON2 SPON2 SPON2 SPON2 SPON2 SPON2 SPON2 SPON2 SPON2
MARCS_HUMAN MARCS
LAMA1_HUMAN LAMA1 LAMA1 LAMA1 LAMA1
SERPH_HUMAN SERPH SERPH SERPH SERPH SERPH SERPH
PLOD1_HUMAN PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1
CO4A1_HUMAN
GOLM1_HUMAN GOLM1 GOLM1
ENPP2_HUMAN ENPP2 ENPP2 ENPP2 ENPP2 ENPP2 ENPP2 ENPP2 ENPP2
LAMA4_HUMAN LAMA4 LAMA4 LAMA4
TARSH_HUMAN TARSH TARSH
PTK7_HUMAN PTK7 PTK7 PTK7 PTK7 PTK7 PTK7 PTK7 PTK7 PTK7 PTK7
SAP3_HUMAN SAP3 SAP3 SAP3 SAP3 SAP3 SAP3
CD109_HUMAN CD109 CD109 CD109 CD109 CD109
PAMR1_HUMAN
KPYM_HUMAN KPYM KPYM
PTGDS_HUMAN PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS
IBP6_HUMAN IBP6 IBP6 IBP6 IBP6
PROTID adhesion regulation killing process process localization growth process localization locomotion process process organismalprocess pigmentation reproduction process stimulus process process
STC2_HUMAN STC2 STC2 STC2 STC2 STC2 STC2 STC2 STC2
F180A_HUMAN
CFAB_HUMAN CFAB CFAB CFAB
CSTN1_HUMAN CSTN1 CSTN1
VAS1_HUMAN VAS1 VAS1 VAS1 VAS1 VAS1
FBLN4_HUMAN
CATL1_HUMAN CATL1 CATL1 CATL1 CATL1 CATL1 CATL1
CAB45_HUMAN
CTHR1_HUMAN CTHR1 CTHR1 CTHR1 CTHR1 CTHR1 CTHR1 CTHR1
MFAP5_HUMAN MFAP5 MFAP5 MFAP5 MFAP5
CD59_HUMAN CD59 CD59 CD59 CD59 CD59 CD59
MIF_HUMAN MIF MIF MIF MIF MIF MIF MIF MIF
CXCL5_HUMAN CXCL5 CXCL5 CXCL5 CXCL5 CXCL5 CXCL5 CXCL5
ADAM9_HUMAN ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9
S10AB_HUMAN S10AB S10AB S10AB S10AB
MA2A1_HUMAN MA2A1 MA2A1 MA2A1 MA2A1 MA2A1
CATK_HUMAN CATK CATK CATK CATK CATK CATK
CAP1_HUMAN CAP1 CAP1 CAP1 CAP1 CAP1 CAP1 CAP1
CYTC_HUMAN CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC
MXRA8_HUMAN
CCD80_HUMAN CCD80 CCD80
FBLN2_HUMAN FBLN2
COR1C_HUMAN COR1C COR1C COR1C COR1C COR1C COR1C COR1C COR1C
NPC2_HUMAN NPC2 NPC2 NPC2 NPC2 NPC2 NPC2 NPC2 NPC2
KNL1_HUMAN
CD9_HUMAN
CD14_HUMAN

Serum from the model mice was sampled and biochemically analyzed. The average value of each measurement was s as follows (correction was not made by diluting 100 μL of serum with 400 μL of physiological saline). Total bilirubin (PBS 0.04 ± 0.02, supernatant concentrate 0.03 ± 0.01 (unit mg/ml)), AST (PBS 2956 ± 1133, supernatant concentrate 2195 ± 1319 (unit IU/L)), ALT (PBS 2538 ± 663, supernatant concentrate 1448 ± 608 (unit IU/L)), LD (PBS 3574 ± 1873, supernatant concentrate 997 ± 572 (unit IU/L)), ALP (PBS 120 ± 15, supernatant concentrate 99 ± 18 (unit IU/L)). The serum liver injury markers (ALT, LD and ALP) were significantly reduced at 20 h after the administration of hMSC-AT-CM (Fig. 3(b)).

The Biological Processes, Cellular Components and Molecular Function of Proteins Identified from hMSC-AT-CM

The biological processes of proteins were analyzed using the Mascot software program with the SwissProt 2016 database.

In this study, a secreted protein expression analysis of hMSC-AT was performed using LC-MS/MS and 128 proteins were identified (Table 1). LC-MS/MS showed that 106 new functional proteins and 22 proteins (FINC, PAI1, POSTN, PGS2, TIMP1, AMPN, CFAH, VIME, PEDF, SPRC, LEG1, ITGBL, ENOA, CSPG2, CLUS, IBP4, IBP7, PGS1, IBP2, STC2, CTHR1, CD9) were previously reported in hMSC-AT-CMs. In addition, various proteins associated with growth (SAP, SEM7A, PTK7); immune system processes (CO1A2, CO1A1, CATB, TSP1, GAS6, PTX3, C1 S, SEM7A, G3P, PXDN, SRCRL, CD248, SPON2, ENPP2, CD109, CFAB, CATL1, MFAP5, MIF, CXCL5, ADAM9, CATK); and reproduction (MMP2, CATB, FBLN1, SAP, MFGM, GDN, CYTC) were identified in hMSC-AT-CMs.

Biological processes

FINC, CATB, TSP1, GAS6, SAP, SEM7A, SRCRL, MFGM, GDN, SPON2, PTK7, ADAM9 and CYTC all seemed to be widely involved in the function of hMSC-AT-CM under the classification of ‘biological processes’ (Table 3). FINC was distributed in sites such as those associated with the response to biological adhesion, biological regulation, cellular processes, the developmental process, the establishment of localization, the immune system process, localization, locomotion, the metabolic process, the multicellular organismal process, and response to stimulus. Collagen types I, V, VI and XII, and fibronectin (ECM components) were detected in hMSC-AT-CM by MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry25. Fibronectin is a major ECM component that supports cell adhesion by presenting an integrin binding domain26. FINC in plasma is taken up by the fibrin clot during tissue injury, contributing to the platelet function and hemostasis. The cell’s FINC is then synthesized by the cells to reconstitute the damaged tissue27. CATB, TSP1, GAS6, SAP, SEM7A, SRCRL, MFGM, GDN, SPON2, PTK7, ADAM9 and CYTC were newly detected in hMSC-AT-CM. MFGM was distributed in sites such as those associated with the response to biological adhesion, biological regulation, cellular processes, the developmental process, the establishment of localization, localization, the metabolic process, multi-organism processes, multicellular organismal processes, reproduction, the reproductive process, and the viral process. Jang et al. presented a pathology model showing that MFGM inhibits hepatic fibrosis via the signal of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β28 (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The biological processes, cellular components and molecular function of the hMSC-AT-CM proteins (as determined by GO). The PCA of proteome dynamics based on the protein information generated by high-resolution mass spectrometry. (a) The ordinate shows each protein’s biological function, and the abscissa indicates the proteins that were identified. The names of the proteins classified in Table 3 are listed by their abbreviated names. (b) The ordinate shows the name of each organelle, and the abscissa indicates the number of proteins identified. The names of the proteins classified in Table 4 are listed by their abbreviated names. (c) The ordinate shows each protein’s molecular function, and the abscissa indicates the proteins identified. The names of the proteins classified in Table 5 are listed by their abbreviated names.

Cellular components

Proteins synthesized in the rough endoplasmic reticulum are transported to the lumen of the rough endoplasmic reticulum and transported or secreted to the cell membrane via the Golgi apparatus. In hMSC-AT-CM, GAS6, CLUS, NUCB1, CATZ, PTGDS, STC2, CSTN1, and CD59 also seem to be widely involved in the function of hMSC-AT-CM under the classifications of endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, membrane, and extracellular region of ‘cellular component’ (Table 4). STC2 suppresses the oxidative stress-induced cell damage of MSC. In the clinical application of MSC, it was suggested that STC2 promotes the long-term therapeutic effects of therapeutic cells29. GAS6, CLUS, NUCB1, CATZ, CSTN1 and CD59 were newly detected in hMSC-AT-CM (Fig. 4b).

Table 4.

Cellular Component.

UniProt/SWISS-PROTID golgi
apparatus
cytoplasm cytoskeleton endoplasmic
reticulum
endosome extracellular
region
intracellular
organelle
membrane mitochondrion nucleus organelle
membrane
organelle
part
plasma
membrane
ribosome
FINC_HUMAN FINC FINC FINC FINC FINC FINC
BGH3_HUMAN BGH3 BGH3 BGH3 BGH3 BGH3 BGH3 BGH3
CO6A1_HUMAN CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1 CO6A1
CO6A3_HUMAN CO6A3 CO6A3 CO6A3 CO6A3 CO6A3 CO6A3 CO6A3
CO1A2_HUMAN CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2
PAI1_HUMAN PAI1 PAI1 PAI1 PAI1 PAI1 PAI1
FSTL1_HUMAN FSTL1
POSTN_HUMAN POSTN POSTN POSTN POSTN POSTN
MMP2_HUMAN MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2 MMP2
CO1A1_HUMAN CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1
FBN1_HUMAN FBN1
FBN2_HUMAN FBN2
CATB_HUMAN CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB CATB
LAMB1_HUMAN LAMB1 LAMB1
PGS2_HUMAN PGS2 PGS2 PGS2 PGS2 PGS2
CO6A2_HUMAN CO6A2 CO6A2 CO6A2 CO6A2 CO6A2 CO6A2 CO6A2
LTBP1_HUMAN LTBP1
TSP1_HUMAN TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1 TSP1
TIMP1_HUMAN TIMP1 TIMP1 TIMP1 TIMP1
AMPN_HUMAN AMPN AMPN AMPN AMPN AMPN AMPN AMPN
CO3A1_HUMAN CO3A1 CO3A1 CO3A1 CO3A1 CO3A1
CFAH_HUMAN CFAH
LTBP2_HUMAN LTBP2
CO5A1_HUMAN CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1
LG3BP_HUMAN LG3BP LG3BP LG3BP LG3BP LG3BP
LAMC1_HUMAN LAMC1
MFAP2_HUMAN MFAP2
VIME_HUMAN VIME VIME VIME VIME VIME VIME VIME
PCOC1_HUMAN PCOC1
COBA1_HUMAN COBA1 COBA1 COBA1 COBA1 COBA1
PEDF_HUMAN PEDF PEDF PEDF
SPRC_HUMAN SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC SPRC
GAS6_HUMAN GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6
LEG1_HUMAN LEG1 LEG1 LEG1 LEG1
OLFL3_HUMAN OLFL3
PTX3_HUMAN PTX3
LAMA2_HUMAN LAMA2 LAMA2 LAMA2
ITGBL_HUMAN ITGBL
AEBP1_HUMAN AEBP1 AEBP1 AEBP1 AEBP1
CO5A2_HUMAN CO5A2 CO5A2 CO5A2 CO5A2 CO5A2
FBLN1_HUMAN FBLN1
ENOA_HUMAN ENOA ENOA ENOA ENOA ENOA ENOA ENOA
FBLN5_HUMAN FBLN5
LUM_HUMAN LUM LUM LUM LUM LUM
DKK3_HUMAN DKK3
CO4A2_HUMAN CO4A2 CO4A2 CO4A2 CO4A2 CO4A2
CSPG2_HUMAN CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2
SRPX_HUMAN SRPX SRPX SRPX SRPX
C1S_HUMAN C1S
ECM1_HUMAN ECM1 ECM1 ECM1 ECM1
NID1_HUMAN NID1
SAP_HUMAN SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP SAP
SEM7A_HUMAN SEM7A SEM7A SEM7A
CLUS_HUMAN CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS CLUS
LYOX_HUMAN LYOX LYOX LYOX
QSOX1_HUMAN QSOX1 QSOX1 QSOX1 QSOX1 QSOX1 QSOX1 QSOX1
G3P_HUMAN G3P G3P G3P G3P G3P G3P G3P G3P G3P
TICN1_HUMAN TICN1 TICN1
EMIL1_HUMAN EMIL1
WISP2_HUMAN WISP2
TFPI1_HUMAN TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1 TFPI1
PXDN_HUMAN PXDN PXDN PXDN PXDN
PGBM_HUMAN PGBM PGBM PGBM PGBM PGBM PGBM PGBM
IBP4_HUMAN IBP4
VASN_HUMAN VASN VASN VASN VASN VASN VASN VASN VASN
GPNMB_HUMAN GPNMB GPNMB GPNMB GPNMB
SRCRL_HUMAN SRCRL SRCRL SRCRL
FBLN3_HUMAN FBLN3
PLTP_HUMAN PLTP
PROF1_HUMAN PROF1 PROF1 PROF1 PROF1 PROF1 PROF1
IBP7_HUMAN IBP7
PGS1_HUMAN PGS1 PGS1 PGS1 PGS1 PGS1 PGS1 PGS1
NUCB1_HUMAN NUCB1 NUCB1 NUCB1 NUCB1 NUCB1 NUCB1 NUCB1 NUCB1 NUCB1 NUCB1 NUCB1
CD44_HUMAN CD44 CD44
AGRIN_HUMAN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN
MFGM_HUMAN MFGM MFGM MFGM
RCN1_HUMAN RCN1 RCN1 RCN1 RCN1
FAM3C_HUMAN FAM3C FAM3C FAM3C FAM3C FAM3C
CATZ_HUMAN CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ CATZ
PDIA1_HUMAN PDIA1 PDIA1 PDIA1 PDIA1 PDIA1 PDIA1 PDIA1
IBP2_HUMAN IBP2 IBP2 IBP2 IBP2 IBP2
TPP1_HUMAN TPP1 TPP1 TPP1 TPP1 TPP1
GDN_HUMAN GDN GDN GDN GDN GDN
CD248_HUMAN CD248 CD248 CD248
SPON2_HUMAN SPON2
MARCS_HUMAN MARCS MARCS MARCS MARCS MARCS MARCS MARCS MARCS
LAMA1_HUMAN LAMA1
SERPH_HUMAN SERPH SERPH SERPH SERPH SERPH SERPH
PLOD1_HUMAN PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1
CO4A1_HUMAN CO4A1
GOLM1_HUMAN GOLM1 GOLM1 GOLM1 GOLM1 GOLM1 GOLM1
ENPP2_HUMAN ENPP2 ENPP2 ENPP2
LAMA4_HUMAN LAMA4
TARSH_HUMAN TARSH
PTK7_HUMAN PTK7 PTK7
SAP3_HUMAN SAP3 SAP3 SAP3 SAP3 SAP3 SAP3 SAP3
CD109_HUMAN CD109 CD109 CD109
PAMR1_HUMAN PAMR1
KPYM_HUMAN KPYM KPYM KPYM KPYM KPYM KPYM KPYM
PTGDS_HUMAN PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS
IBP6_HUMAN IBP6 IBP6 IBP6 IBP6
STC2_HUMAN STC2 STC2 STC2 STC2 STC2
F180A_HUMAN F180A
CFAB_HUMAN CFAB
CSTN1_HUMAN CSTN1 CSTN1 CSTN1 CSTN1 CSTN1 CSTN1 CSTN1 CSTN1 CSTN1 CSTN1
VAS1_HUMAN VAS1 VAS1 VAS1 VAS1 VAS1 VAS1 VAS1
FBLN4_HUMAN FBLN4
CATL1_HUMAN CATL1 CATL1 CATL1 CATL1 CATL1 CATL1
CAB45_HUMAN
CTHR1_HUMAN CTHR1 CTHR1
MFAP5_HUMAN MFAP5
CD59_HUMAN CD59 CD59 CD59 CD59 CD59 CD59 CD59 CD59 CD59
MIF_HUMAN MIF MIF MIF MIF MIF
CXCL5_HUMAN CXCL5
ADAM9_HUMAN ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9
S10AB_HUMAN S10AB S10AB S10AB S10AB
MA2A1_HUMAN MA2A1 MA2A1 MA2A1 MA2A1 MA2A1 MA2A1 MA2A1
CATK_HUMAN CATK CATK CATK CATK CATK
CAP1_HUMAN CAP1 CAP1 CAP1 CAP1 CAP1 CAP1 CAP1
CYTC_HUMAN CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC CYTC
MXRA8_HUMAN
CCD80_HUMAN CCD80
FBLN2_HUMAN FBLN2
COR1C_HUMAN COR1C COR1C COR1C COR1C COR1C
NPC2_HUMAN NPC2 NPC2 NPC2 NPC2
KNL1_HUMAN
CD9_HUMAN
CD14_HUMAN

Molecular function

In hMSC-AT-CM, LTBP1, AMPN, GAS6, FBLN1, PXDN, FBLN3, PGS1, ENPP2, PTK7 and MIF also seem to be widely involved in the function of hMSC-AT-CM under the classification of ‘molecular function’ (Table 5).

Table 5.

Molecular Function.

UniProt/SWISS-PROT ID Antioxidant activity Binding Catalytic activity Chemoattractant activity Chemorepellent activity Electron carrier activity Enzyme regulator activity Molecular function Molecular transducer activity Motor activity Structural molecule activity Transporter activity
FINC_HUMAN FINC FINC FINC
BGH3_HUMAN BGH3 BGH3
CO6A1_HUMAN CO6A1 CO6A1
CO6A3_HUMAN CO6A3 CO6A3
CO1A2_HUMAN CO1A2 CO1A2 CO1A2
PAI1_HUMAN PAI1 PAI1 PAI1
FSTL1_HUMAN FSTL1 FSTL1
POSTN_HUMAN POSTN POSTN
MMP2_HUMAN MMP2 MMP2 MMP2
CO1A1_HUMAN CO1A1 CO1A1 CO1A1
FBN1_HUMAN FBN1 FBN1 FBN1
FBN2_HUMAN FBN2 FBN2 FBN2
CATB_HUMAN CATB CATB CATB
LAMB1_HUMAN LAMB1 LAMB1
PGS2_HUMAN PGS2 PGS2 PGS2
CO6A2_HUMAN
LTBP1_HUMAN LTBP1 LTBP1 LTBP1 LTBP1
TSP1_HUMAN TSP1 TSP1
TIMP1_HUMAN TIMP1 TIMP1 TIMP1
AMPN_HUMAN AMPN AMPN AMPN AMPN
CO3A1_HUMAN CO3A1 CO3A1 CO3A1
CFAH_HUMAN CFAH CFAH
LTBP2_HUMAN LTBP2 LTBP2
CO5A1_HUMAN CO5A1 CO5A1 CO5A1
LG3BP_HUMAN LG3BP LG3BP
LAMC1_HUMAN LAMC1 LAMC1
MFAP2_HUMAN
VIME_HUMAN VIME VIME VIME
PCOC1_HUMAN PCOC1 PCOC1 PCOC1
COBA1_HUMAN COBA1 COBA1 COBA1
PEDF_HUMAN PEDF PEDF PEDF
SPRC_HUMAN SPRC SPRC
GAS6_HUMAN GAS6 GAS6 GAS6 GAS6
LEG1_HUMAN LEG1 LEG1
OLFL3_HUMAN
PTX3_HUMAN PTX3 PTX3
LAMA2_HUMAN LAMA2 LAMA2 LAMA2
ITGBL_HUMAN
AEBP1_HUMAN AEBP1 AEBP1 AEBP1
CO5A2_HUMAN CO5A2 CO5A2 CO5A2
FBLN1_HUMAN FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1 FBLN1
ENOA_HUMAN ENOA ENOA ENOA
FBLN5_HUMAN FBLN5 FBLN5
LUM_HUMAN LUM LUM LUM
DKK3_HUMAN
CO4A2_HUMAN CO4A2 CO4A2
CSPG2_HUMAN CSPG2 CSPG2 CSPG2
SRPX_HUMAN
C1S_HUMAN C1S C1S C1S
ECM1_HUMAN ECM1 ECM1
NID1_HUMAN NID1 NID1
SAP_HUMAN SAP SAP SAP
SEM7A_HUMAN SEM7A SEM7A SEM7A
CLUS_HUMAN CLUS CLUS CLUS
LYOX_HUMAN LYOX LYOX LYOX
QSOX1_HUMAN QSOX1 QSOX1
G3P_HUMAN G3P G3P G3P
TICN1_HUMAN TICN1 TICN1 TICN1
EMIL1_HUMAN EMIL1 EMIL1 EMIL1
WISP2_HUMAN WISP2 WISP2
TFPI1_HUMAN TFPI1 TFPI1
PXDN_HUMAN PXDN PXDN PXDN PXDN PXDN
PGBM_HUMAN PGBM PGBM
IBP4_HUMAN IBP4 IBP4
VASN_HUMAN VASN VASN
GPNMB_HUMAN GPNMB GPNMB GPNMB
SRCRL_HUMAN SRCRL SRCRL SRCRL
FBLN3_HUMAN FBLN3 FBLN3 FBLN3 FBLN3
PLTP_HUMAN PLTP PLTP
PROF1_HUMAN PROF1 PROF1 PROF1
IBP7_HUMAN IBP7 IBP7
PGS1_HUMAN PGS1 PGS1 PGS1 PGS1
NUCB1_HUMAN NUCB1 NUCB1
CD44_HUMAN CD44 CD44
AGRIN_HUMAN AGRIN AGRIN AGRIN
MFGM_HUMAN MFGM MFGM
RCN1_HUMAN RCN1 RCN1
FAM3C_HUMAN FAM3C FAM3C
CATZ_HUMAN CATZ CATZ CATZ
PDIA1_HUMAN PDIA1 PDIA1 PDIA1
IBP2_HUMAN IBP2 IBP2
TPP1_HUMAN TPP1 TPP1 TPP1
GDN_HUMAN GDN GDN GDN
CD248_HUMAN CD248 CD248
SPON2_HUMAN SPON2 SPON2
MARCS_HUMAN MARCS MARCS
LAMA1_HUMAN LAMA1 LAMA1 LAMA1
SERPH_HUMAN SERPH SERPH SERPH
PLOD1_HUMAN PLOD1 PLOD1 PLOD1
CO4A1_HUMAN CO4A1 CO4A1
GOLM1_HUMAN GOLM1 GOLM1
ENPP2_HUMAN ENPP2 ENPP2 ENPP2 ENPP2
LAMA4_HUMAN LAMA4 LAMA4 LAMA4
TARSH_HUMAN TARSH TARSH
PTK7_HUMAN PTK7 PTK7 PTK7 PTK7
SAP3_HUMAN SAP3 SAP3 SAP3 SAP3
CD109_HUMAN CD109 CD109 CD109
PAMR1_HUMAN PAMR1 PAMR1
KPYM_HUMAN KPYM KPYM KPYM
PTGDS_HUMAN PTGDS PTGDS PTGDS
IBP6_HUMAN IBP6 IBP6
STC2_HUMAN STC2 STC2
F180A_HUMAN
CFAB_HUMAN CFAB CFAB
CSTN1_HUMAN CSTN1 CSTN1
VAS1_HUMAN VAS1 VAS1 VAS1
FBLN4_HUMAN FBLN4 FBLN4 FBLN4
CATL1_HUMAN CATL1 CATL1 CATL1
CAB45_HUMAN
CTHR1_HUMAN CTHR1 CTHR1
MFAP5_HUMAN MFAP5 MFAP5
CD59_HUMAN CD59 CD59
MIF_HUMAN MIF MIF MIF MIF
CXCL5_HUMAN CXCL5 CXCL5
ADAM9_HUMAN ADAM9 ADAM9 ADAM9
S10AB_HUMAN S10AB S10AB
MA2A1_HUMAN MA2A1 MA2A1 MA2A1
CATK_HUMAN CATK CATK CATK
CAP1_HUMAN CAP1 CAP1
CYTC_HUMAN CYTC CYTC CYTC
MXRA8_HUMAN
CCD80_HUMAN CCD80 CCD80
FBLN2_HUMAN FBLN2 FBLN2 FBLN2
COR1C_HUMAN COR1C COR1C
NPC2_HUMAN NPC2 NPC2
KNL1_HUMAN
CD9_HUMAN
CD14_HUMAN

POSTN, PGS2, TIMP1, PEDF, LEG1 and IBP7, the protein function of which was not especially wide was related to the biological processes, cellular components and molecular function of hMSCs (Table 1). POSTN has previously been reported as a factor that promotes the in vivo proliferation activity of cancer in association with hACS transplantation30. POSTN has been reported to promote the cell migration of MSC-BM via PI3K/Akt signaling through receptor integrin αvβ331. The simultaneous administration of MSC-BM and PGS2 was reported to significantly improve thioacetamide-induced the rat model of hepatic fibrosis in comparison with the administration of MSC-BM alone32. The TIMP1 contained in the culture supernatant of the immortalized MSC line RCB2157 was reported to inhibit the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells33. MSC-BM in aged mice show the increased expression of PEDF. PEDF was reported to promote or inhibit the growth of cells affected by myocardial infarction34. PEDF has also been reported to promote the expression of bone formation genes and mineral deposition genes of human MSC-BM35. It has been reported that IBP7 has an important function in the action of MSC-BM in preparation for immune regulation in a mouse model of colitis36. LTBP1, AMPN, GAS6, FBLN1, PXDN, FBLN3, PGS1, ENPP2, PTK7 and MIF were newly detected in hMSC-AT-CM (Fig. 4c).

Discussion

In recent years, genome sequencing and epigenetic analysis techniques have provided important information to help clarify the causes of diseases. The application of cell therapy in regenerative medicine is expected to be useful for the treatment of many types of diseases. Genetic, epigenetic, and proteomic analysis techniques play an important role in inducing the differentiation of cells used for cell therapy. Several papers focusing on the MSCs involved in the treatment of liver diseases have been published and the functions of the factors identified in the latest analysis have been explained.

A proteomic analysis using LC-MS/MS provides evidence to support the possible application of cell therapy using MSCs and information regarding the potential application of MSCs in the treatment of liver disease. This information provides important clues for investigating the function. However, MSCs are distributed throughout the body, and there are different types of MSCs, such as mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue (MSC-ATs), bone marrow (MSC-BMs), umbilical cord blood (MSC-UCs), and dental pulp (MSC-DPs). In previous reports, to identify the proteins expressed in MSCs, MSC-BMs, components contained in the culture supernatant of MSC-DPs and MSC-ATs were examined8,10,11. Banas et al. showed that hMSC-AT secreted interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), IL-6, IL-8, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), nerve growth factor (NGF), and HGF using a protein-array analysis8. The authors explained that these factors were effective in improving the mouse liver function. Poll et al. showed that the analysis of the serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which are known to be upregulated during liver injury, revealed a nonsignificant decrease in the levels of IL-1 and significantly lower levels of TNF-α and IL-6 after MSC-CM treatment. On the other hand, the levels of IL-10 (an anti-inflammatory cytokine) were increased four-fold in MSC-CM–treated animals. These data suggest that the infusion of MSC-CM alters the systemic cytokine profile associated with acute liver failure to a more anti-inflammatory state11. Yukawa et al. reported that the administration of mouse MSC-ATs into the blood resulted in an improvement of the liver function and a reduction in the blood concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in mice37. The authors cited a paper that reported that IL-6 is effective for improving the liver function of mice among these factors and explained the improvement of the liver function of MSC-CM38. Parekkadan et al. reported that the majority (69/174 [30%]) of proteins contained in MSC-BM-CM (according to a protein array) are chemokines and are widely involved in immune regulation and liver regeneration11. Similarly to the abovementioned studies, hMSC-AT-CM was also shown to improve mouse liver function (Fig. 3(a) and (b)). This study showed that hMSC-AT-CM was administered to mice to ameliorate the symptoms of acute liver failure induced by the administration of CCL4. Our findings indicate that hMSC-AT-CM is likely to have the effect of ameliorating symptoms of human liver disease. Therefore, the MSCGM-CD mesenchymal stem cell BulletKit (Lonza) was used to create hMSC-AT-CM. This medium was a clinical grade medium approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare for use in human clinical treatment research. However, we must bear in mind that the components and amounts of hMSC-AT-CM secreted by hMSC-ATs will likely change depending on the composition of the culture medium.

Since the data in the present study were obtained from the hMSC-AT-CM from one donor, we must consider the reliability of the data. In addition, the proteins were detected by a label-free method. Protein quantification was determined from the peptide ion data obtained by mass spectrometry using the number of peptide fragments identified by the database analysis as an index. This principle is based on the PAI39 method, which states that, “quantitatively more proteins can detect more peptide fragments in the same protein.” This method was used to determine the emPAI40, which estimates the protein abundance based on the peptides calculated and theoretically observed tryptic peptides for each protein using the Scaffold software program. This program identifies and quantitatively displays proteins using proprietary algorithms (Peptide/Protein Prophet, Protein grouping). Thus, the quantification of the amount of protein in this paper is a theoretical value estimated based on the emPAI40 function of the Scaffold software program. The ratio of the number of measured peptides to the number of theoretical peptides is linearly related to the logarithm of the protein concentration, and the number obtained by subtracting 1 from the index of the peptide number ratio was defined as the emPAI40. The larger the emPAI40 value, the greater the amount of protein. Proteins quantified using emPAI were listed from the top in the tables showing the GO analysis results (Tables 1, 3, and 4) in descending order of concentration.

Conclusions

In this study, which used an LC-MS/MS measuring system, we focused on the quantified amount of protein and components contained in hMSC-AT-CM that improve the liver function, with a focus on the function of proteins classified by a GO analysis. These analyses revealed a number of new candidates associated with growth (SAP, SEM7A, PTK7); the immune system processes (CO1A2, CO1A1, CATB, TSP1, GAS6, PTX3, C1 S, SEM7A, G3P, PXDN, SRCRL, CD248, SPON2, ENPP2, CD109, CFAB, CATL1, MFAP5, MIF, CXCL5, ADAM9, CATK); and reproduction (MMP2, CATB, FBLN1, SAP, MFGM, GDN, CYTC). MSC-CM contains proteins secreted by MSCs and the proteins that were initially added to the culture medium. In Table 6, the proteins identified in hMSC-AT-CM are listed in the far-left column, with the medium component proteins using culture medium for hMSC-ATs listed in the next column. Proteins secreted by hMSC are predicted by the following formula: hMSC-AT-CM containing protein – medium containing protein = hMSC-AT secreted protein. Table 6 also lists eight articles that can be searched using the keywords MSC, ADSC, mesenchymal stem cell, LC/MS/MS, CM, conditional medium, protein, and secretion on the PubMed database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/). Secreted proteins of MSCs are listed in Table 6. This research method differs from a protein array and enables a comprehensive analysis of the protein expression. We succeeded in identifying 106 types of novel proteins contained in MSC-CM. The newly identified protein components contained in hMSC-AT-CM provide valuable information to support the clinical application of hMSC-AT-CM.

Table 6.

Previous Reports; hMSC Secreted Protein Identified.

hMSC-ATa-CMd Proteins excluded from protein list of hMSC-AT-CM
(overlapped with basal medium)
PLoS ONE 2007;Issue 9:e94111
hMSC-BMb-CM
PLoS ONE 2008;3:e1886
hMSC-BM-CM41
The Journal of Neuroscience
2015;11:2452–2464
hMSC-BM & hMSC-DPc-CM42
Exp Cell Res 2010;16: 1271–1281
hMSC-BM-CM25
STEM CELLS 2008;26:2705–27128 TISSUE ENGINEERING 2012;Part A 18:1479–14899 Molecular Therapy
2015;23: 549–560
hMSC-BM-CM43
Scientific Reports
2013;4:3652
hMSC-BM-CM44
hMSC- BM-CM hMSC- AT-CM hMSC-BM-CM
FINC PROF1 ALBU IBP1 CXCL5 CXCL1 COL1A1 IL1RA IL1RA IGF-1 STC1 SCRG1
BGH3 IBP7 TRFE LEP CSF3 MMP10 COL1A2 IL6 IL6 VEGF
CO6A1 PGS1 HPT CCL2 GROA FST COL5A2 IL7 IL7
CO6A3 NUCB1 A1BG IL8 CCL1 LYVE1 COL6A1 IL8 IL8
CO1A2 CD44 HEMO BMP4 IL1A ADA17 COL11A1 IL15 IL15
PAI1 AGRIN FETUA TNFL6 IL1B NRG1 FINC CSF3 CSF3
FSTL1 MFGM HPTR FGF6 IL2 MMP7 FND3A CSF2 CSF2
POSTN RCN1 PGRP2 TNFB IL3 FURIN SPRC X3CL1 X3CL1
MMP2 FAM3C ITIH4 CNTF IL4 ANGI IBP7 CCL11 CCL11
CO1A1 CATZ AFAM IL9 IL6 TNR11 CCL2 CCL2
FBN1 PDIA1 TTHY IBP4 IL8 LEG7 VEGF VEGF
FBN2 IBP2 APOH TGFA IL10 NRCAM HGF HGF
CATB TPP1 VTDB SCF IL12 UFO NGF NGF
LAMB1 GDN ZA2G CCL22 CCL2 MMP3 IL12 CXL10
PGS2 CD248 A2GL TGFB3 CSF1 TSLP CCL3 IL12
CO6A2 SPON2 IGKC CXCL9 CCL22 FRIL/H EGF CCL3
LTBP1 MARCS IGLC2 CCL27 CCL4 TNR27 CCL4
TSP1 LAMA1 C1R IBP2 CCL5 FSTL EGF
TIMP1 SERPH IGLL5 CXL11 SCF TNR5 IL10
AMPN PLOD1 CERU CXCL6 SDF1 DKK3 IL17
CO3A1 CO4A1 RET4 MCP4 TNFA RETN
CFAH GOLM1 A1AG2 TNFA TNFB TNNT1
LTBP2 ENPP2 ATRN CCL20 EGF NID1
CO5A1 LAMA4 IGHG1 GDNF IGF1 TR10B
LG3BP TARSH CPN2 BMP6 ANGI IL22
LAMC1 PTK7 HBB TGFB2 ONCM MMP2
MFAP2 SAP3 HBA BDNF TPO PRS27
VIME CD109 AMBP SDF1 VEGF NCAM1
PCOC1 PAMR1 APOD CXL13 PDGFB MICA
COBA1 KPYM A1AG1 CXL16 LEP FCG2B
PEDF PTGDS DYH5 IL6 BDNF INS
SPRC IBP6 CFAI TIMP2 FGF4 SCF
GAS6 IC1 FGF2 FGF7 OSTP
LEG1 C1RL CCL15 FGF9 TGFB1
OLFL3 THBG FGF9 FLT3L PLF4
PTX3 AGRF4 CSF3 X3CL1 IBP6
LAMA2 KNG1 IL7 GDNF SOMA
ITGBL FETUB TGFB1 HGF D3DMB4
AEBP1 MYO5B CCL8 IBP1 ELAF
CO5A2 CF163 CSF1 IBP3 GDF15
FBLN1 5NT3B ANGI IBP4 IL19
ENOA FA11 EGF CXCL10 BGH3
FBLN5 KLKB1 CCL16 LIF IL5RA
LUM LCAT AMPL1 TNF14 SIGL9
DKK3 CCL5 CCL20 BCAM
CO4A2 ANGP CXCL7 HGF
CSPG2 GROA NTF3 XCL1
SRPX TIMP4 NTF4 VEGFC
C1S IBP6 CCL18 TR11B
ECM1 TIMP1 PLGF TIMP2
NID1 INHBA TGFB2 MIF
SAP LIF TGFB3 CD166
SEM7A CCL11 TIMP1 HAVR1
CLUS HGF TIMP2 CCL28
LYOX CXL10 TNR8
QSOX1 CCL26 CCL2
G3P PDGFA TPO
TICN1 BMP7 IL6RA
EMIL1 MMP9 SAA
WISP2 PDGFB SCRB2
TFPI1 IGF1 MMP8
PXDN MMP1 EPOR
PGBM BMP5 PIGF
IBP4 ADIPO IL6RA/B
VASN IL1RA TIMP1
GPNMB CXCL5 VEGFA
SRCRL CCL1 IFNL2
FBLN3 VEGFA TR10C
PLTP FGF7

a human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from adipose tissue;b human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone marrow; c human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from dental pulp; d conditional medium.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material, Nakashima(SupFig1)2018-6-11(3) - A Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Analysis of the Proteins Secreted by Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Supplemental Material, Nakashima(SupFig1)2018-6-11(3) for A Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Analysis of the Proteins Secreted by Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Yoshiki Nakashima, Saifun Nahar, Chika Miyagi-Shiohira, Takao Kinjo, Zensei Toyoda, Naoya Kobayashi, Issei Saitoh, Masami Watanabe, Jiro Fujita, and Hirofumi Noguchi in Cell Transplantation

Acknowledgements

We thank Naomi Kakazu (University of the Ryukyus) for clerical assistance and Saki Uema, Yuka Onishi, Maki Higa, Youichi Toyokawa, Yuki Kawahira and Saori Adaniya (University of the Ryukyus) for providing technical support. We thank Masayoshi Tsukahara (Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.) for his expert technical advice on cell culture methods, which was provided under a cooperative research contract with Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.

Footnotes

Ethical Approval: Ethical Approval is not applicable for the article. (In this paper, we did not conduct clinical studies that required Institutional review).

Statement of Human and Animal Rights: All experimental protocols were performed according to the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals set by Research Laboratory Center, Faculty of Medicine, and the Institute of Animal Experiments, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus (Okinawa, Japan). The experimental protocol was approved by the Committee on Animal Experiments of University of the Ryukyus (permit number: A2017101).

Statement of Informed Consent: Statement of Informed Consent is not applicable for the article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS; KAKENHI Grant Number 16H07094), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, The Naito Foundation, and Okinawa Science and Technology Promotion Center (OSTC). This work was supported by the Research Laboratory Center, Faculty of Medicine, and the Institute for Animal Experiments, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus.

ORCID iD: Hirofumi Noguchi Inline graphic http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0880-6805

Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1. Thomas MB, Zhu AX. Hepatocellular carcinoma: The need for progress. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(13):2892–2899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411):143–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bieback K, Kern S, Kluter H, Eichler H. Critical parameters for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells. 2004;22(4):625–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. In’t Anker PS, Scherjon SA, Kleijburg-van der Keur C, de Groot-Swings GM, Claas FH, Fibbe WE, Kanhai HH. Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells of fetal or maternal origin from human placenta. Stem Cells. 2004;22(7):1338–1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ, Benhaim P, Lorenz HP, Hedrick MH. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: Implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng. 2001;7(2):211–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P, De Ugarte DA, Huang JI, Mizuno H, Alfonso ZC, Fraser JK, Benhaim P, Hedrick MH. Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(12):4279–4295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Schaffler A, Buchler C. Concise review: Adipose tissue-derived stromal cells – basic and clinical implications for novel cell-based therapies. Stem Cells. 2007;25(4):818–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Banas A, Teratani T, Yamamoto Y, Tokuhara M, Takeshita F, Osaki M, Kawamata M, Kato T, Okochi H, Ochiya T. Ifats collection: In vivo therapeutic potential of human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells after transplantation into mice with liver injury. Stem Cells. 2008;26(10):2705–2712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Osugi M, Katagiri W, Yoshimi R, Inukai T, Hibi H, Ueda M. Conditioned media from mesenchymal stem cells enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial bone defects. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18(13–14):1479–1489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. van Poll D, Parekkadan B, Cho CH, Berthiaume F, Nahmias Y, Tilles AW, Yarmush ML. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived molecules directly modulate hepatocellular death and regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Hepatology. 2008;47(5):1634–1643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Parekkadan B, van Poll D, Suganuma K, Carter EA, Berthiaume F, Tilles AW, Yarmush ML. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived molecules reverse fulminant hepatic failure. Plos One. 2007;2(9):e941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Nakashima Y, Miyagi-Shiohira C, Kobayashi N, Saitoh I, Watanabe M, Noguchi H. A proteome analysis of pig pancreatic islets and exocrine tissue by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Islets. 2017;9(6):159–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pocsfalvi G, Stanly C, Fiume I, Vekey K. Chromatography and its hyphenation to mass spectrometry for extracellular vesicle analysis. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1439:26–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Park JO, Choi DY, Choi DS, Kim HJ, Kang JW, Jung JH, Lee JH, Kim J, Freeman MR, Lee KY, Gho YS, Kim KP. Identification and characterization of proteins isolated from microvesicles derived from human lung cancer pleural effusions. Proteomics. 2013;13(14):2125–2134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Little KM, Smalley DM, Harthun NL, Ley K. The plasma microparticle proteome. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2010;36(8):845–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;6(5):359–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2003;75(17):4646–4658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wu TT, Wu SS, Ouyang GL. Periostin: A new extracellular regulator of obesity-induced hepatosteatosis. Cell Metabolism. 2014;20(4):562–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lu Y, Liu X, Jiao Y, Xiong X, Wang E, Wang X, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Pan L, Guan Y, Cai D, Ning G, Li X. Periostin promotes liver steatosis and hypertriglyceridemia through downregulation of pparalpha. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(8):3501–3513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhou Z, Xu MJ, Gao B. Hepatocytes: A key cell type for innate immunity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13(3):301–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. De Minicis S, Rychlicki C, Agostinelli L, Saccomanno S, Trozzi L, Candelaresi C, Bataller R, Millan C, Brenner DA, Vivarelli M, Mocchegiani F, Marzioni M, Benedetti A, Svegliati-Baroni G. Semaphorin 7a contributes to tgf-beta-mediated liver fibrogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2013;183(3):820–830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Soto-Gutierrez A, Navarro-Alvarez N, Caballero-Corbalan J, Tanaka N, Kobayashi N. Endoderm induction for hepatic and pancreatic differentiation of es cells. Acta Med Okayama. 2008;62(2):63–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lanzoni G, Oikawa T, Wang YF, Cui CB, Carpino G, Cardinale V, Gerber D, Gabriel M, Dominguez-Bendala J, Furth ME, Gaudio E, Alvaro D, Inverardi L, Reid LM. Concise review: Clinical programs of stem cell therapies for liver and pancreas. Stem Cells. 2013;31(10):2047–2060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. de Jong IEM, van Leeuwen OB, Lisman T, Gouw ASH, Porte RJ. Repopulating the biliary tree from the peribiliary glands. Bba-Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864(4):1524–1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Walter MN, Wright KT, Fuller HR, MacNeil S, Johnson WE. Mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium accelerates skin wound healing: An in vitro study of fibroblast and keratinocyte scratch assays. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(7):1271–1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mao Y, Schwarzbauer JE. Fibronectin fibrillogenesis, a cell-mediated matrix assembly process. Matrix Biol. 2005;24(6):389–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. To WS, Midwood KS. Plasma and cellular fibronectin: Distinct and independent functions during tissue repair. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2011;4:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Jang YJ, An SY, Kim JH. Identification of mfge8 in mesenchymal stem cell secretome as an anti-fibrotic factor in liver fibrosis. BMB Rep. 2017;50(2):58–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kim PH, Na SS, Lee B, Kim JH, Cho JY. Stanniocalcin 2 enhances mesenchymal stem cell survival by suppressing oxidative stress. BMB Rep. 2015;48(12):702–707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Heo SC, Lee KO, Shin SH, Kwon YW, Kim YM, Lee CH, Kim YD, Lee MK, Yoon MS, Kim JH. Periostin mediates human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell-stimulated tumor growth in a xenograft lung adenocarcinoma model. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813(12):2061–2070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Matsuzawa M, Arai C, Nomura Y, Murata T, Yamakoshi Y, Oida S, Hanada N, Nakamura Y. Periostin of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts promotes migration of human mesenchymal stem cell through the alphavbeta3 integrin/fak/pi3k/akt pathway. J Periodontal Res. 2015;50(6):855–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jang YO, Cho MY, Yun CO, Baik SK, Park KS, Cha SK, Chang SJ, Kim MY, Lim YL, Kwon SO. Effect of function-enhanced mesenchymal stem cells infected with decorin-expressing adenovirus on hepatic fibrosis. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;5(9):1247–1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Clarke MR, Imhoff FM, Baird SK. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit breast cancer cell migration and invasion through secretion of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and-2. Mol Carcinogen. 2015;54(10):1214–1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Liang HL, Hou HY, Yi W, Yang GD, Gu CH, Lau WB, Gao EH, Ma XL, Lu ZF, Wei XF, Pei JM, Yi DH. Increased expression of pigment epithelium-derived factor in aged mesenchymal stem cells impairs their therapeutic efficacy for attenuating myocardial infarction injury. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(22):1681–1690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Li F, Song N, Tombran-Tink J, Niyibizi C. Pigment epithelium-derived factor enhances differentiation and mineral deposition of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2013;31(12):2714–2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Liao Y, Lei J, Liu M, Lin W, Hong D, Tuo Y, Jiang MH, Xia H, Wang M, Huang W, Xiang AP. Mesenchymal stromal cells mitigate experimental colitis via insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7-mediated immunosuppression. Mol Ther. 2016;24(10):1860–1872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Yukawa H, Watanabe M, Kaji N, Okamoto Y, Tokeshi M, Miyamoto Y, Noguchi H, Baba Y, Hayashi S. Monitoring transplanted adipose tissue-derived stem cells combined with heparin in the liver by fluorescence imaging using quantum dots. Biomaterials. 2012;33(7):2177–2186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Hoek JB, Pastorino JG. Cellular signaling mechanisms in alcohol-induced liver damage. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24(3):257–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Rappsilber J, Ryder U, Lamond AI, Mann M. Large-scale proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome. Genome Res. 2002;12(8):1231–1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, Sato T, Nagasu T, Rappsilber J, Mann M. Exponentially modified protein abundance index (empai) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4(9):1265–1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Chen L, Tredget EE, Wu PY, Wu Y. Paracrine factors of mesenchymal stem cells recruit macrophages and endothelial lineage cells and enhance wound healing. PLoS One. 2008;3(4):e1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Matsubara K, Matsushita Y, Sakai K, Kano F, Kondo M, Noda M, Hashimoto N, Imagama S, Ishiguro N, Suzumura A, Ueda M, Furukawa K, Yamamoto A. Secreted ectodomain of sialic acid-binding ig-like lectin-9 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 promote recovery after rat spinal cord injury by altering macrophage polarity. J Neurosci. 2015;35(6):2452–2464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ono M, Ohkouchi S, Kanehira M, Tode N, Kobayashi M, Ebina M, Nukiwa T, Irokawa T, Ogawa H, Akaike T, Okada Y, Kurosawa H, Kikuchi T, Ichinose M. Mesenchymal stem cells correct inappropriate epithelial-mesenchyme relation in pulmonary fibrosis using stanniocalcin-1. Mol Ther. 2015;23(3):549–560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Aomatsu E, Takahashi N, Sawada S, Okubo N, Hasegawa T, Taira M, Miura H, Ishisaki A, Chosa N. Novel scrg1/bst1 axis regulates self-renewal, migration, and osteogenic differentiation potential in mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 2014;4:3652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material, Nakashima(SupFig1)2018-6-11(3) - A Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Analysis of the Proteins Secreted by Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Supplemental Material, Nakashima(SupFig1)2018-6-11(3) for A Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Analysis of the Proteins Secreted by Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Yoshiki Nakashima, Saifun Nahar, Chika Miyagi-Shiohira, Takao Kinjo, Zensei Toyoda, Naoya Kobayashi, Issei Saitoh, Masami Watanabe, Jiro Fujita, and Hirofumi Noguchi in Cell Transplantation


Articles from Cell Transplantation are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES