Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2018 Oct 1;2018(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1862-0

Blending type approximation by GBS operators of bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich type

Qing-Bo Cai 1,, Guorong Zhou 2
PMCID: PMC6182413  PMID: 30363771

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a family of GBS operators of bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich type. We estimate the rate of convergence of such operators for B-continuous and B-differentiable functions by using the mixed modulus of smoothness, establish the Voronovskaja type asymptotic formula for the bivariate λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators, as well as give some examples and their graphs to show the effect of convergence.

Keywords: B-continuous functions, B-differentiable functions, GBS operators, Bernstein–Kantorovich operators, Mixed modulus of smoothness

Introduction

In 1912, Bernstein [1] constructed a sequence of polynomials to prove the Weierstrass approximation theorem as follows:

Bn(f;x)=k=0nf(kn)bn,k(x), 1

for any continuous function fC[0,1], where x[0,1], n=1,2,, and Bernstein basis functions bn,k(x) are defined by

bn,k(x)=(nk)xk(1x)nk. 2

The polynomials in (1), called Bernstein polynomials, possess many remarkable properties.

Recently, Cai et al. [2] proposed a new type λ-Bernstein operators with parameter λ[1,1], they obtained some approximation properties and gave some graphs and numerical examples to show that these operators converge to continuous functions f. These operators, which they called λ-Bernstein operators, are defined as follows:

Bn,λ(f;x)=k=0nb˜n,k(λ;x)f(kn), 3

where

{b˜n,0(λ;x)=bn,0(x)λn+1bn+1,1(x),b˜n,i(λ;x)=bn,i(x)+λ(n2i+1n21bn+1,i(x)n2i1n21bn+1,i+1(x)),b˜n,n(λ;x)=bn,n(x)λn+1bn+1,n(x), 4

1in1, bn,k(x) (k=0,1,,n) are defined in (2) and λ[1,1].

In [3], Cai introduced the λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators as

Kn,λ(f;x)=(n+1)k=0nb˜n,k(λ;x)kn+1k+1n+1f(t)dt, 5

where b˜n,k(λ,x) (k=0,1,,n) are defined in (2) and λ[1,1]. He established a global approximation theorem in terms of second order modulus of continuity, obtained a direct approximation theorem by means of the Ditzian–Totik modulus of smoothness and derived an asymptotically estimate on the rate of convergence for certain absolutely continuous functions. Very recently, Acu et al. provided a quantitative Voronovskaja type theorem, a Grüss–Voronovskaja type theorem, and also gave some numerical examples of the operators defined in (5) in [4].

As we know, the generalized Boolean sum operators (abbreviated by GBS operators) were first studied by Dobrescu and Matei in [5]. The Korovkin theorem for B-continuous functions was established by Badea et al. in [6, 7]. In 2013, Miclăuş [8] studied the approximation by the GBS operators of Bernstein–Stancu type. In 2016, Agrawal et al. [9] considered the bivariate generalization of Lupaş–Durrmeyer type operators based on Pólya distribution and studied the degree of approximation for the associated GBS operators. In 2017, Bărbosu et al. [10] introduced the GBS operators of Durrmeyer type based on q-integers, studied the uniform convergence theorem and the degree of approximation of these operators. Very recently, Kajla and Miclăuş [11] introduced the GBS operators of generalized Bernstein–Durrmeyer type and estimated the degree of approximation in terms of the mixed modulus of smoothness.

Motivated by the above research, the aims of this paper are to propose the bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators and the GBS operators of bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich type. We use the mixed modulus of smoothness to estimate the rate of convergence of GBS operators of bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich type for B-continuous and B-differentiable functions, and establish a Voronovskaja type asymptotic formula for the bivariate λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators. In order to show the effect of convergence, we also give some examples and graphs.

This paper is mainly organized as follows: In Sect. 2, we introduce the bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators Km,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y) and the GBS operators UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y). In Sect. 3, some lemmas are given to prove the main results. In Sect. 4, the rate of convergence for B-continuous and B-differentiable functions of GBS operators UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y) is proved. In Sect. 5, we investigate the Voronovskaja type asymptotic formula for bivariate operators Km,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y).

Construction of operators

For fC(I2), I2=[0,1]×[0,1], λ1,λ2[1,1], we introduce the bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators as

Km,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)=(m+1)(n+1)i=0mj=0nb˜m,i(λ1;x)b˜n,j(λ2;y)im+1i+1m+1jn+1j+1n+1f(t,s)dtds, 6

where b˜m,i(λ1;x) (i=0,1,,n) and b˜n,j(λ2;y) (j=0,1,,n) are defined in (4), λ1,λ2[1,1]. Obviously, when λ1=λ2=0, Bm,n0,0(f;x,y) reduce to the bivariate tensor product of classical Bernstein–Kantorovich operators.

The GBS operators of the bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich type are defined as

UKm,nλ1,λ2(f(t,s);x,y)=Km,nλ1,λ2(f(x,s)+f(t,y)f(t,s);x,y)=(m+1)(n+1)i=0mj=0nb˜m,i(λ1;x)b˜n,j(λ2;y)im+1i+1m+1jn+1j+1n+1[f(x,s)+f(t,y)f(t,s)]dsdt, 7

for fCb(I2). Obviously, the operators UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y) are positive linear operators.

Auxiliary results

In order to obtain the main results, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 3.1

([4])

For λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators Kn,λ(f;x) and n>1, we have the following equalities:

Kn,λ(1;x)=1;Kn,λ(t;x)=x+12x2(n+1)+12x+xn+1(1x)n+1n21λ;Kn,λ(t2;x)=x29nx26nx+3x213(n+1)2+2(2x2n+xn+1n+xn+xn+1x)λ(n1)(n+1)2;Kn,λ(t3;x)=x324n2x318n2x2+4nx3+18nx2+4x314nx14(n+1)3Kn,λ(t3;x)=+λ2(n+1)3(n1)[12n2x3+6n2x2+12x3n+6xn+1n230x2nKn,λ(t3;x)=+12xn+1n+6xn+7xn+1(1x)n+18x+1];Kn,λ(t4;x)=15(n+1)4(5n5x430n3x4+40n3x3+55n2x4120n2x330nx4Kn,λ(t4;x)=+75n2x2+80nx375nx2+30nx+1)+2λ(n1)(n+1)4(4n3x4Kn,λ(t4;x)=+2n3x3+12n2x424n2x38x4n+2xn+1n3+6n2x2+22x3nKn,λ(t4;x)=+6xn+1n224x2n+3xn+3xn+13x).

Lemma 3.2

([4])

For λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators Kn,λ(f;x) and n>1, we have

Kn,λ(tx;x)=12x2(n+1)+12x+xn+1(1x)n+1n21λ;Kn,λ((tx)2;x)=x(1x)n+1+16x+6x23(n+1)2+2λ[xn+1(1x)+x(1x)n+1]n21Kn,λ((tx)2;x)=4x(1x)λ(n+1)2(n1).

Lemma 3.3

(See [4, Lemma 2.4])

We have

limnnKn,λ(tx;x)=12x;limnnKn,λ((tx)2;x)=x(1x),x(0,1),limnn2Kn,λ((tx)4;x)=O(1),x(0,1).

Lemma 3.4

For the bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators Km,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y), we have the following inequalities:

Km,nλ1,λ2((tx)2;x,y)2m+1;Km,nλ1,λ2((sy)2;x,y)2n+1;Km,nλ1,λ2((tx)2(sy)2;x,y)4(m+1)(n+1);Km,nλ1,λ2((tx)4(sy)2;x,y)C(m+1)2(n+1);Km,nλ1,λ2((tx)2(sy)4;x,y)C(m+1)(n+1)2,

where C is a positive constant.

Rate of convergence

We first introduce the definitions of B-continuity and B-differentiability, details can be found in [12] and [13]. Let X and Y be compact real intervals. A function f: X×YR is called a B-continuous function at (x0,y0)X×Y if

lim(x,y)(x0,y0)f((x,y),(x0,y0))=0,

where f((x,y),(x0,y0))=f(x,y)f(x0,y)f(x,y0)+f(x0,y0) denotes the mixed difference of f. A function f:X×YR is a B-differentiable function at (x0,y0)X×Y if the following limit exists and is finite:

lim(x,y)(x0,y0)f((x,y),(x0,y0))(xx0)(yy0).

The limit is named the B-differential of f at the point (x0,y0) and denoted by DBf(x0,y0).

The function f:X×YR is B-bounded on X×Y if there exists a k>0 such that |f((x,y),(t,s))|K for any (x,y),(t,s)X×Y.

Let B(X×Y), C(X×Y) denote the spaces of all bounded functions and of all continuous functions on X×Y endowed with the sup-norm , respectively. We also define the following function sets:

Bb(X×Y)={f:X×YR|f is B-bounded on X×Y}

with the norm fB=sup(x,y),(t,s)X×Y|f((x,y),(t,s))|,

Cb(X×Y)={f:X×YR|f is B-continuous on X×Y},

and Db(X×Y)={f:X×YR|f is B-differentiable on X×Y}. It is known that C(X×Y)Cb(X×Y).

Let fBb(X×Y). Then the mixed modulus of smoothness ωmixed(f;,) is defined by

ωmixed(f;δ1,δ2)=sup{|f((x,y),(t,s))|:|xt|δ1,|ys|δ2},

for any δ1,δ20.

Let L:Cb(X×Y)B(X×Y) be a linear positive operator. The operator UL:Cb(X×Y)B(X×Y) defined for any function fCb(X×Y) and any (x,y)X×Y by UL(f(t,s);x,y)=L(f(t,y)+f(x,s)f(t,s);x,y) is called the GBS operator associated to the operator L.

In the sequel, we will consider functions eij:X×YR, eij(x,y)=xiyj for any (x,y)X×Y, and i,jN. In order to estimate the rate of convergence of UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y), we need the following two theorems.

Theorem 4.1

([7])

Let L:Cb(X×Y)B(X×Y) be a linear positive operator and UL:Cb(X×Y)B(X×Y) the associated GBS operator. Then for any fCb(X×Y), any (x,y)(X×Y) and δ1,δ2>0, we have

|UL(f(t,s);x,y)f(x,y)||f(x,y)||1L(e00;x,y)|+[L(e00;x,y)+δ11L((tx)2;x,y)+δ21L((sy)2;x,y)+δ11δ21L((tx)2(sy)2;x,y)]ωmixed(f;δ1,δ2).

Theorem 4.2

([14])

Let L:Cb(X×Y)B(X×Y) be a linear positive operator and UL:Cb(X×Y)B(X×Y) the associated GBS operator. Then for any fDb(X×Y) with DBfB(X×Y), any (x,y)(X×Y) and δ1,δ2>0, we have

|UL(f(t,s);x,y)f(x,y)||f(x,y)||1L(e00;x,y)|+3DBfL((tx)2(sy)2;x,y)+[L((tx)2(sy)2;x,y)+δ11L((tx)4(sy)2;x,y)+δ21L((tx)2(sy)4;x,y)+δ11δ21L((tx)2(sy)2;x,y)]×ωmixed(DBf;δ1,δ2).

First, we will use B-continuous functions to estimate the rate of convergence of UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y) to fCb(I2) by using the mixed modulus of smoothness. We have

Theorem 4.3

For fCb(I2), (x,y)I2 and m,n>1, we have the following inequality:

|UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)f(x,y)|(3+22)ωmixed(f;1m+1,1n+1). 8

Proof

Applying Theorem 4.1 and using Lemma 3.4, we get

|UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)f(x,y)|[1+1δ12m+1+1δ22n+1+2δ1δ2(m+1)(n+1)]ωmixed(f;δ1,δ2).

Therefore, (8) can be obtained from the above inequality by choosing δ1=1m+1 and δ2=1n+1. □

Next, we will give the rate of convergence to the B-differentiable functions for UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y).

Theorem 4.4

Let fDb(I2), DBfB(I2), (x,y)I2 and m,n>1, we have the following inequality:

|UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)f(x,y)|M(m+1)(n+1)[DBf+ωmixed(DBf;1m+1,1n+1)], 9

where C and M are positive constants.

Proof

Using Theorem 4.2 and Lemma 3.4, we have

|UKm,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)f(x,y)|6DBf(m+1)(n+1)+[2(m+1)(n+1)+1δ1(m+1)Cn+1+1δ2(n+1)Cm+1+4δ1δ2(m+1)(n+1)]ωmixed(DBf;δ1,δ2).

Hence, taking δ1=1m+1, δ2=1n+1 and using the above inequality, we get the desired result (9). □

Example 4.5

Let f(x,y)=xy+x2, x,y[0,1], the graphs of f(x,y) and UK10,101,1(f(s,t);x,y) are shown in Fig. 1. Figure 2 shows the partially enlarged graphs of f(x,y) and UK10,101,1(f(s,t);x,y).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Graphs of UK10,101,1(f(s,t);x,y) and f(x,y)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Partially enlarged graphs of UK10,101,1(f(s,t);x,y) and f(x,y)

Voronovskaja type asymptotic formulas for Km,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)

In this section, we will give a Voronovskaja type asymptotic formula for Km,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y).

Theorem 5.1

Consider an fC(I2). Then for any x,y(0,1) and λ1,λ2[1,1], we have

limnn[Kn,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)f(x,y)]=fx(x,y)2(12x)+fy(x,y)2(12y)+12[fx2′′(x,y)x(1x)+fy2′′(x,y)y(1y)].

Proof

For (x,y),(t,s)I2, by Taylor’s expansion, we have

f(t,s)=f(x,y)+fx(x,y)(tx)+fy(x,y)(sy)+12[fx2′′(x,y)(tx)2+2fxy′′(x,y)×(tx)(sy)+fy2′′(x,y)(sy)2]+ρ(t,s;x,y)(tx)4+(sy)4, 10

where ρ(t,s;x,y)C(I2) and lim(t,s)(x,y)ρ(t,s;x,y)=0.

Applying Kn,nλ1,λ2(f;x) to (10), we obtain

Kn,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)=f(x,y)+fx(x,y)Kn,λ1(tx;x)+fy(x,y)Kn,λ2(sy;y)+12[fx2′′(x,y)Kn,λ1((tx)2;x)+fy2′′(x,y)Kn,λ2((sy)2;y)+2fxy′′(x,y)Kn,nλ1,λ2((tx)(sy);x,y)]+Kn,nλ1,λ2(ρ(t,s;x,y)(tx)4+(sy)4;x,y).

Taking the limit on both sides of the above equality, we have

limnn[Kn,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)f(x,y)]=fx(x,y)limnnKn,λ1(tx;x)+fy(x,y)limnnKn,λ2(sy;y)+12[fx2′′(x,y)limnnKn,λ1((tx)2;x)+fy2′′(x,y)limnnKn,λ2((sy)2;y)+2fxy′′(x,y)limnnKn,nλ1,λ2((tx)(sy);x,y)]+limnnKn,nλ1,λ2(ρ(t,s;x,y)(tx)4+(sy)4;x,y). 11

Using Lemma 3.2, we have

limnnKn,nλ1,λ2((tx)(sy);x,y)=limnn[Kn,λ1(tx;x)Kn,λ2(sy;y)]=0. 12

By Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, we have

nKn,nλ1,λ2(ρ(t,s;x,y)(tx)4+(sy)4;x,y)Kn,nλ1,λ2(ρ2(t,s;x,y);x,y)n2Kn,nλ1,λ2((tx)4+(sy)4;x,y)Kn,nλ1,λ2(ρ2(t,s;x,y);x,y)×n2Kn,λ1((tx)4;x)+n2Kn,λ2((sy)4;y).

Since lim(t,s)(x,y)ρ(t,s;x,y)=0, using Lemma 3.3, we obtain

limnnKn,nλ1,λ2(ρ(t,s;x,y)(tx)4+(sy)4;x,y)=0. 13

Therefore, by (11), (12), (13) and Lemma 3.3, we have

limnn[Kn,nλ1,λ2(f;x,y)f(x,y)]=fx(x,y)2(12x)+fy(x,y)2(12y)+12[fx2′′(x,y)x(1x)+fy2′′(x,y)y(1y)].

Thus we have obtained the desired result. □

Example 5.2

Consider the function f(x,y)=xy+x2, x,y[0,1]. The graphs of f(x,y) and K20,201,1(f;x,y) are shown in Fig. 3. We also give the graphs of K10,101,1(f;x,y) and UK10,101,1(f(s,t);x,y) in Fig. 4 to compare the bivariate λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators with GBS operators.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Graphs of K20,201,1(f;x,y) and f(x,y)

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Graphs of K10,101,1(f;x,y) and UK10,101,1(f(s,t);x,y)

Conclusion

In this paper, we deduce the rate of convergence of GBS operators of bivariate tensor product of λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich type for B-continuous and B-differentiable functions by using the mixed modulus of smoothness, as well as obtain the Voronovskaja type asymptotic formula for bivariate λ-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

We thank Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Data Intensive Computing and Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Information Processing of Fujian Province University.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

The authors wrote the whole manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11601266), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (Grant No. 2016J05017) and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Qing-Bo Cai, Email: qbcai@126.com.

Guorong Zhou, Email: goonchow@xmut.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Bernstein S.N. Démonstration du théorème de Weierstrass fondée sur la calcul des probabilités. Comm. Soc. Math. Charkow Sér. 1912;13:1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cai Q.B., Lian B.Y., Zhou G. Approximation properties of λ-Bernstein operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018;2018:61. doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1653-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cai Q.B. The Bézier variant of Kantorovich type λ-Bernstein operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018;2018:90. doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1688-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Acu A.M., Manav N., Sofonea D.F. Approximation properties of λ-Kantorovich operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018;2018:202. doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1795-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dobrescu E., Matei I. The approximation by Bernstein type polynomials of bidimensional continuous functions. An. Univ. Timişoara Ser. Şti. Mat.-Fiz. 1966;4:85–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Badea C., Badea I., Gonska H.H. A test function theorem and approximation by pseudopolynomials. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 1986;34:53–64. doi: 10.1017/S0004972700004494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Badea C., Cottin C. Korovkin-type theorems for generalized Boolean sum operators. Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai. 1990;58:51–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miclăuş D. On the GBS Bernstein–Stancu’s type operators. Creative Math. Inform. 2013;22:73–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Agrawal P.N., Ispir N., Kajla A. GBS operators of Lupaş–Durrmeyer type based on Pólya distribution. Results Math. 2016;69:397–418. doi: 10.1007/s00025-015-0507-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bărbosu D., Acu A.M., Muraru C.V. On certain GBS-Durrmeyer operators based on q-integers. Turk. J. Math. 2017;41(2):368–380. doi: 10.3906/mat-1601-34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kajla A., Miclăuş D. Blending type approximation by GBS operators of generalized Bernstein–Durrmeyer type. Results Math. 2018;73(1):1–21. doi: 10.1007/s00025-018-0773-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bögel K. Mehrdimensionale differentiation von funktionen mehrerer veränderlicher. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1934;170:197–217. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bögel K. Über die mehrdimensionale differentiation. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1935;173:5–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pop O.T. Approximation of B-differentiable functions by GBS operators. An. Univ. Oradea, Fasc. Mat. 2007;14:15–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gonska, H.H.: Quantitative approximation in C(X), Habilitationsschrift, Universität Duisburg (1985)

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Journal of Inequalities and Applications are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES