Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetologia. 2018 Aug 3;61(10):2164–2173. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4697-9

Table 2.

Associations between gluten intake and type 2 diabetes

Cohort/model Gluten (g/day)
ptrend
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

NHS
    Median intake, g/day (range) 2.61(0.01,
3.21)
3.67(3.22, 4.07) 4.47(4.08, 4.87) 5.34(4.88, 5.91) 6.80(5.92, 23.59)
    Cases/person-years 1619/330,21
1
1570/330,322 1394/330,222 1290/330,782 1215/330,914
    Model 1 1 0.98 (0.91, 1.05) 0.88 (0.82, 0.94) 0.81 (0.75, 0.87) 0.76 (0.70, 0.82) <0.001
    Model 2 1 0.95 (0.89, 1.02) 0.87 (0.81, 0.93) 0.83 (0.77, 0.89) 0.83 (0.76, 0.89) <0.001
    Model 3 1 0.95 (0.88, 1.02) 0.86 (0.80, 0.93) 0.83 (0.77, 0.89) 0.83 (0.77, 0.90) <0.001
     Model 4 1 0.97 (0.90, 1.05) 0.90 (0.83, 0.98) 0.87 (0.80, 0.95) 0.90 (0.81, 0.99) 0.008
NHSII
    Median intake, g/day (range) 3.62(0.01,
4.34)
4.89(4.35, 5.37) 5.87(5.38, 6.38) 6.97(6.39, 7.69) 8.83(7.70, 27.03)
    Cases/person-years 1679/357,12
5
1168/357,596 997/358,121 830/357,727 786/357,611
     Model 1 1 0.71 (0.66, 0.77) 0.62 (0.57, 0.67) 0.52 (0.47, 0.56) 0.49 (0.45, 0.53) <0.001
    Model 2 1 0.86 (0.80, 0.93) 0.82 (0.75, 0.89) 0.73 (0.67, 0.80) 0.74 (0.68, 0.81) <0.001
    Model 3 1 0.87 (0.81, 0.94) 0.84 (0.77, 0.91) 0.75 (0.69, 0.82) 0.77 (0.71, 0.84) <0.001
     Model 4 1 0.89 (0.82, 0.97) 0.88 (0.80, 0.96) 0.81 (0.73, 0.89) 0.84 (0.75, 0.94) <0.001
HPFS
    Median intake, g/day (range) 3.49(0.01,
4.30)
4.93(4.31, 5.48) 6.03(5.49, 6.60) 7.25(6.61, 8.05) 9.35(8.06, 33.46)
    Cases/person-years 904/159,813 730/160,276 668/160,392 575/160,293 522/160,334
    Model 1 1 0.82 (0.74, 0.90) 0.76 (0.69, 0.84) 0.65 (0.58, 0.72) 0.59 (0.53, 0.66) <0.001
    Model 2 1 0.86 (0.78, 0.95) 0.84 (0.75, 0.93) 0.76 (0.68, 0.84) 0.76 (0.68, 0.85) <0.001
    Model 3 1 0.86 (0.78, 0.95) 0.84 (0.76, 0.93) 0.77 (0.69, 0.85) 0.79 (0.71, 0.88) <0.001
    Model 4 1 0.87 (0.79, 0.97) 0.87 (0.78, 0.98) 0.82 (0.72, 0.93) 0.88 (0.76, 1.02) 0.05
Pooled
    Model 1 1 0.84 (0.80, 0.88) 0.75 (0.71, 0.78) 0.66 (0.62, 0.69) 0.62 (0.59, 0.65) <0.001
    Model 2 1 0.89 (0.85, 0.93) 0.83 (0.80, 0.88) 0.77 (0.73, 0.81) 0.78 (0.74, 0.82) <0.001
    Model 3 1 0.89 (0.85, 0.93) 0.84 (0.80, 0.88) 0.78 (0.74, 0.82) 0.80 (0.76, 0.84) <0.001
    Model 4 1 0.91 (0.87, 0.96) 0.88 (0.83, 0.93) 0.83 (0.78, 0.88) 0.87 (0.81, 0.93) <0.001

HRs and 95% CIs for the association between quintiles of gluten intake and type 2 diabetes were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models Model 1, adjusted for age

Model 2, further adjusted for ethnicity (white, African-American, Asian, and other ethnicity), family history of diabetes (yes/no), smoking status (never, former, current [1–14, 15–24, or ≥ 25 cigarettes/day], or missing), alcohol intake (g/day: 0, 0.1–4.9, 5.0–14.9, and ≥ 15.0 in women, 0, 0.1–4.9, 5.0–29.9, and ≥ 30.0 in men, or missing), physical activity (<3, 3.0–8.9, 9.0–17.9, 18.0–26.9, ≥ 27.0 METs, or missing), menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use (pre-menopause, postmenopause [never, former, or current hormone use], or missing, for women), oral contraceptive use (yes, no, or missing, for NHSII), multivitamin use (yes/no), BMI (<23.0, 23.0–24.9, 25.0–29.9, 30.0–34.9, ≥ 35.0 kg/m2, or missing), and total energy intake based on model 1

Model 3, further adjusted for AHEI (in quintiles), folic acid intake (in quintiles) and magnesium intake (in quintiles), based on model 2

Model 4, further adjusted for cereal fibre intake based on model 3