Skip to main content
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice logoLink to Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
. 2015 Mar 28;2(2):204. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12147

How Do I Examine Rigidity and Spasticity?

Conor Fearon 1,, Laura Doherty 1, Tim Lynch 1
PMCID: PMC6183506  PMID: 30363919

Abstract

Examination of tone (increased resistance to the passive movement of a joint) is a clinically useful and occasionally neglected part of the neurological examination. Rigidity and spasticity are two distinct types of hypertonia that arise from distinct anatomical pathways. The ability to differentiate between these two entities therefore gives important information regarding localization. Whereas spasticity arises as a result of damage to the corticoreticulospinal (pyramidal) tracts, rigidity is caused by dysfunction of extrapyramidal pathways, most commonly the basal ganglia, but also as a result of lesions of the mesencephalon and spinal cord. Spasticity is characterized by abnormally high muscle tone, which often asymmetrically affects antagonistic muscle groups. It is both amplitude and velocity dependent and is therefore best assessed using rapid movements of the relevant joint to effect abrupt stretching of the muscle group involved. When a threshold velocity, angle, or amplitude is reached, a sudden increase in tone can be detected as a characteristic “catch.” Rigidity differs from spasticity in that the increased tone remains constant throughout the range of movement of the joint. It is independent of velocity and should even be detectable with very slow movements. It is present in flexors and extensor muscle groups equally, giving rise to a uniform quality in all directions often described as “lead pipe” rigidity. Given that rigidity frequently arises in diseases of the basal ganglia, a tremor can coexist, giving rise to an interrupted “cogwheeling” effect. We herein describe an approach to the examination of patients with rigidity and spasticity.

Keywords: Rigidity, spasticity

Author Roles

(1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique.

C.F.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3A

L.D.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B

T.L.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B

Disclosures

Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no sources of funding and no conflicts of interest.

Financial Disclosures for previous 12 months: The authors declare that there are no disclosures to report.

Supporting information

A video accompanying this article is available in the supporting information here.

Video. This video describes an approach to the examination of patients with rigidity and spasticity.

Relevant disclosures and conflicts of interest are listed at the end of this article.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

A video accompanying this article is available in the supporting information here.

Video. This video describes an approach to the examination of patients with rigidity and spasticity.


Articles from Movement Disorders Clinical Practice are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES