Skip to main content
Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM logoLink to Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM
. 2018 Sep 30;2018:9569685. doi: 10.1155/2018/9569685

Acupuncture and Related Therapies for Obesity: A Network Meta-Analysis

Yanji Zhang 1, Jia Li 1,2,3, Guoyan Mo 4, Jing Liu 1, Huisheng Yang 5, Xianglin Chen 1, Hui Liu 1, Teng Cai 1, Xian Zhang 1, Xiangmin Tian 1, Zhongyu Zhou 2,3,, Wei Huang 2,3,
PMCID: PMC6186334  PMID: 30363899

Abstract

Obesity is a worldwide public health problem. Currently, increasing evidence suggests acupuncture and related therapies are effective for obesity. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to compare the effectiveness of different acupuncture and related therapies. We searched potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in three international databases. Thirty-four trials involving 2283 participants were included. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that acupuncture and related therapies were superior to lifestyle modification and placebo in reducing weight and body mass index (BMI). Based on decreases in body weight, results from NMA showed that acupoint catgut embedding (standard mean difference [SMD]: 1.26; 95% credible interval [95% CI], 0.46–2.06), acupuncture (SMD: 2.72; 95% CrI, 0.06–5.29), and combination of acupuncture and related theories (SMD: 3.65; 95% CrI, 0.96–6.94) were more effective than placebo. Another NMA result indicated that acupoint catgut embedding (SMD: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.25–1.11), acupuncture (SMD: 1.28; 95% CrI, 0.43–2.06), combination of acupuncture and related therapies (SMD: 1.44; 95% CrI, 0.64–2.38), and electroacupuncture (SMD: 0.60; 95% CrI, 0.03–1.22) were superior to lifestyle modification in decreasing BMI. Combination of acupuncture and related therapies was ranked the optimal method for both reducing weight and BMI. Further studies will clarify which combination of acupuncture and related therapies is better.

1. Introduction

Obesity, a worldwide public health problem, is described as an adiposity-based chronic disease [1]. Currently, guidelines recommended using body mass index (BMI) to classify individuals as having obesity (BMI 30 kg/m2) [2]. Based on the survey conducted previously, the standardized prevalence rates for obesity in adult were 34.9% in United States and 17.7% in China [3, 4]. Moreover, it is associated with other health concerns, such as insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, which increased individuals and societies' medical burden [5].

Lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery are considered the mainstay of therapy for obesity [2]. Although diet and exercise play an essential role in the weight management, their precise mode of action remains controversial [6]. Five long-term medicines (naltrexone-bupropion, phentermine-topiramate orlistat, lorcaserin, and liraglutide) have been approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of obesity [7]. The latest research suggested that phentermine-topiramate was associated with the highest possibility of achieving at least 5% weight loss [7]. However, little is known about the long-term safety profile of pharmacotherapy for weight loss. The effectiveness of bariatric procedures for treating obesity has been reported in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [810]. Nevertheless, the evidence on cardiovascular disease and mortality remains to be validated [11]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore other forms of alternative therapies which are both safe and effective in preventing gaining weight.

In reviewing the literature, it became evident that acupuncture and related therapies have been wildly used for obesity treatment. As mentioned in the meta-analysis, combination of acupuncture and lifestyle modification is more effective compared with lifestyle modification alone [12]. Results of Yeh's research suggested that ear acupoint stimulation had remarkable improvements in the anthropometric parameters of Body Weight (BW), BMI, and so on [13]. In addition, another systematic review performed in 2015 has also shown that clinical efficacy of acupoint catgut embedding therapy was better than that of the control group for simple obesity [14]. However, a major problem is that whether acupuncture or acupuncture-related therapies alone or combined therapy is more effective than lifestyle modification management remains disputable.

By using the technique of network meta-analysis (NMA), both direct and indirect randomized data can be analyzed, and recommended rankings of different treatments can be provided [15, 16]. Therefore, we conducted this Bayesian network meta-analysis to analyse both direct and indirect comparisons of acupuncture and related methods for treating obesity. In this paper, changes in BW, BMI, and the rates of complications of included studies were analyzed.

2. Methods

Our research was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Network Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-NMA) checklist [17] (see Appendix 1).

2.1. Data Sources and Search Strategy

Three electronic international databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for potential RCTs (randomized controlled trials). We identified articles published from initiation to December 2017 with a limit to studies of RCT and without limitations on language or the form they are published in. The complete search strategies are shown in Appendix 2.

2.2. Study Selection

Two researchers (XC and HL) independently identified irrelevant research based on titles and abstracts. Additionally, full-text articles were scanned by these two researchers to identify eligible studies. All disagreements were resolved by consensus and adjudged by a third reviewer (TC) if necessary. In case of duplicate citations, the most updated studies were selected for data extraction.

2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The studies included in the NMA met the following criteria: (1) the study design must be a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT); (2) patients diagnosed with simple obesity irrespective of ages and sex as study subjects; diagnostic criteria must be clear and inclusion and exclusion criteria were explicit; (3) at least one of the following efficacy outcomes or safety endpoints was included: BW, BMI, and adverse events; (4) participants in the experimental group have received acupuncture and related treatments (specifically, classical body acupuncture; electroacupuncture auricular acupoint stimulation; acupoint catgut embedding and warming acupuncture) alone or in combination; (5) English or Chinese language studies.

The following were excluded: (1) self-control and non-RCTs; (2) preclinical studies, systematic reviews, case reports, and meta-analyses; (3) reports without sufficient and clear original data; (4) participants having received other forms of acupuncture such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or laser acupuncture; (5) duplicate studies and studies reporting the same results.

2.4. Data Collection and Quality Assessment

According to a standard data collection sheet, two investigators (TC and XZ) independently extracted the following data: (1) main characteristics of included randomized controlled trials (i.e., year of publication, type of intervention, patients characteristics, types of outcome, and reported adverse events); (2) details of acupuncture and related interventions (i.e., frequency and duration of acupuncture sessions, names of acupuncture points used, and retention time); (3) clinical outcome (i.e., summaries of mean, standard difference, and sample size between treatment groups). In some trials, the change between baseline and after treatment was failed to present. Using the methods recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1) [18], the missing data was estimated using the following formula:

Xchange=XposttreatmentXbaseline (1)
SDchange=SDbaseline2+SDposttreatment22×r×SDbaseline×SDposttreatment (2)

where r is a correlation coefficient with a value of 0.5 [19]. For each included RCT, two researches (XT and XC) independently assessed their risk of bias by the Cochrane Collaboration tool [20]. Bias risks of each study were assessed from six aspects: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and investigators, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data addressed, and selective outcome reporting, while ranked in high risk, low risk, and unclear risk.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Firstly, standard pairwise meta-analysis was initially performed using the Review Manager (Version 5.3, Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). We calculated I-square (I2) test to assess heterogeneity among RCTs [21]. To be specific, when there was I2 > 50%, they were analysed using a random effects model; otherwise, a fixed effect model was chosen. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the type of acupuncture treatment and the treatment of control group. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to analyze continuous data. We generated forest plots to illustrate the relative strength of curative effects.

Second, to indirectly compare the effectiveness among treatments of acupuncture and related therapies, we did a random effects model NMA within a Bayesian framework, by using WinBUGS (Version 1.4.3, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK) [22, 23]. Models were computed with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation methods, using four chains with overdispersed initial values. We utilized the Markov chains for 50,000 simultaneous iterations after the first 20000 iterations were discarded because they may have an influence on the arbitrary value. In this process, the convergence of the model was assessed by the Brooks-Gelman-Rubin (BGR) method; a value of potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) close to 1 indicated the better convergence [24]. The continuous outcome was measured by a standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% credible intervals (CrI) for indirect comparisons.

Finally, plot of surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated using the STATA software (Version 13.0; Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA), which indicated the probability of each intervention of being ranked best [25]. In our study, higher SUCRA scores mean the higher rank of the treatment [15]. A Z value and its corresponding p-value were calculated, and an R value less than 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Study Search

We performed this research on Dec 26 2017. As shown in Figure 1, a total of 1050 records were initially identified from the databases. 675 studies left after duplicates were removed. 577 records were excluded after carefully scanning titles and abstracts. Finally, 34 trials with 2283 participants were included in our NMA [2659], covering 8 groups, manual acupuncture; electroacupuncture; auricular acupoint stimulation; acupoint catgut embedding; pharmacotherapy; warming acupuncture; lifestyle modification; placebo.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA flow chart.

3.2. Study Description

Main characteristics of included RCTs were shown in Table 1. The participants were from Australia [28], the United States [26], Turkey [46], Korea [51], Iran [36], Egypt [48], and China. Age of participants ranged from 15 to 70 years, while the sample size of the studies ranged from 12 to 86. Among the included RCTs, there were one four-arm trials, 5 three-arm trials, and 28 two-arm trials. Fourteen studies compared acupuncture to placebo. Ten studies compared acupuncture to lifestyle intervention. Six studies compared combined therapies to acupuncture alone. Details about acupuncture points used, retention time, frequency, and duration of acupuncture sessions were shown in Table 2. In these research, 30 articles [2630, 32, 3438, 4159] reported the weight loss, while 25 articles reported the change in BMI. The details of mean, standard difference (SD), and sample size between different groups for eligible studies are summarized in Appendix 3. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment was presented in Table 3. Furthermore, the network plot of included comparisons was shown in Figure 2.

Table 1.

Main characteristics of included randomized controlled trials.

Study ID and Country Sample size R/A Age: mean (SD) or range
R/A
Intervention Control Adverse events reported
R/A
Type of outcomes
Allison et al. [17] 1995, USA 35/34 19 - 70 AAS Placebo Redness, pain, bleeding BW,

Hsu et al. [18] 2005, Taiwan 24/22 41.5(11.2)/41.0 (10.0) EA LM Ecchymosis(2), abdominal discomfort(1)/None BW, BMI

Richards et al. [19] 1998, Australia 28/32 44.1 (11.7)/43.0 (13.6) AAS Placebo intercurrent illness and discontinued(1)/None BW

He et al. [20] 2008, China 40/40 18 - 50 Combined therapies# Pharmacotherapy NR BW, BMI

Li et al. [21] 2006, China 26/30 16.00(1.38)/16.00(1.95) EA LM NR BMI
29/30 15.00(2. 04)/16.00(1.95) AAS

Tong et al. [22] 2011, China 76/42 35.08(9.31)/34.60(8. 55) Acupuncture Placebo Adverse events VAS BMI

Hsu et al. [23] 2009, Taiwan 23/22 40.0 (10.5)/39.4 (13.6) AAS Placebo Minor-inflammation(1), mild tenderness (7)/mild tenderness (2) BW, BMI

Hsieh et al. [24] 2010, Taiwan 26/26 18 - 20 AAS Placebo NR BMI

Hsieh et al. [25] 2011, Taiwan 27/28 18 - 20 AAS Placebo NR BW

Abdi et al. [26] 2012, Iran 86/83 37.29(1.0)/38.73 (1.1) AAS Placebo None BW, BMI

Darbandi et al. [27] 2012, Iran 43/43 37.57(9.26)/37.65(9.71) AR+ LM Placebo None BW, BMI,

He et al. [28] 2012, China 30/30 18-54 AR+ LM LM NR BW, BMI

Lien et al. [29] 2012, Taiwan 24/23 39.2(11.6)/40.7 (9.7) AAS Placebo Dizziness (1)/None BW, BMI

Darbandi et al. [30] 2014, Iran 20/20 38.0(0.9)/38.0(1.3) EA Placebo(EA) None BW, BMI
20/20 39.0(1.8)/37.9(1.5) AAS Placebo(AAS)

Yeh et al. [31] 2015, Taiwan 36/34 29.9 (7.7)/32.8 (9.5) EA Placebo NR BMI

Chen et al. [32] 2007, China 40/40 43.1(13.6)/44.6(10.3) ACE Acupuncture NR BW, BMI

Huang et al. [33] 2011, China 30/30 NR ACE EA NR BW, BMI

Tang et al. [34] 2009, China 33/32 21-54/22-55 Combined therapies EA NR BW, BMI

Shi et al, [35] 2006, China 40/42 17-49/18-51 Combined therapies EA NR BW, BMI

Hsu et al. [36] 2005, Taiwan 22/20 40.0 (11.5)/41.3 (9.9) EA LM mild Ecchymosis(3), abdominal discomfort(1)/None BW, BMI

Güçel et al. [37] 2012, Turkey 20/20 34.6±6.3/36.8±7.8 Acupuncture Placebo NR BW, BMI

Deng et al. [38] 2014, China 30/30 32(7)/33(7) Combined therapies Acupuncture NR BW
30/30 32(7)/33(8) ACE

Hassan et al. [39] 2014, Egypt 21/30 45.00 (9.32)/43.47 (9.59) AR+ LM LM NR BW, BMI

He et al. [40] 2014, China 28/28 NR Combined therapies Acupuncture NR BW, BMI

Wang et al. [41] 2013, China 45/45 31(10)/32(12) EA Acupuncture NR BMI

Sujung et al. [42] 2014, South Korea 22/15 34.7(11.9)/42.7(10.2) AAS Placebo NR BW, BMI

Bu et al. [43] 2007, China 32/23 32.1(1.1)/33.4(1.3) Combined therapies Acupuncture NR BW, BMI

Shi et al. [44] 2005, China 36/32 19~58/18~56 WA EA NR BW

Yang et al. [45] 2010, China 31/30 18~42/18~48 AR+ LM LM NR BW

Cabioglu et al. [46] 2005, Turkey 22/12 39.8(5.3)/43.3(4.3) EA Placebo NR BW
22/21 39.8(5.3)/42.7(3.9) LM

Cabioglu et al. [47] 2006, Turkey 20/15 42.1(4.4)/41.8(4.6) EA Placebo NR BW
20/15 42.1(4.4)/42.9 (4.3) LM

Cabioglu et al. [48] 2008, Turkey 20/15 40.55 (5.30)/41.47 (4.61) EA Placebo NR BW
20/23 40.55 (5.30)/42.91(4.02) LM

Darbandi et al. [49] 2013, Iran 42/44 36.50 (9.26)/36.48 (8.69) AR+ LM Placebo NR BW, BMI

Fogarty et al. [50] 2015, Australia 19/16 >18 AR+ LM Placebo NR BMI

BW: body weight; BMI: body mass index; LM: lifestyle modification; AAS: auricular acupoint stimulation; EA: electroacupuncture; ACE: acupoint catgut embedding; WA: warming acupuncture; AR: acupuncture and related therapies; #combination of acupuncture and related therapies.

Table 2.

Descriptions of the included acupuncture and related therapies.

Study ID (Country) Style of acupuncture Names of acupuncture points used Retention time Frequency & duration of Acupuncture sessions
Allison et al. 1995, USA AAS NR 2-3 min 3 sessions daily for 12 weeks

Hsu et al. 2005, Taiwan EA Qiai(REN9), Shuifen(REN9)
Shuidao(ST28), Siman(K14)
Zusanli(ST26), Fenglong(ST40) Sanginjao(SP6)
40 min 2 sessions weekly for 6 weeks

Richards et al. 1998, Australia AAS Shenmen(TF4), Stomach(CO4) 15-20 min 2 sessions daily for 4 weeks

He et al. 2008, China Combined therapies# Ear acupressure:
Shenmen(TF4), Neifenmi(CO18),
Pi(CO13), Wei(CO14),
Sanjiao(CO17), Dachang(CO7),
Naodian
Body acupuncture:
Tianshu(ST25), Guanyuan(RN4) Sanyinjiso(SP9), Fenglong(ST40) Zusanli(ST36)
Ear acupressure:3 days Body acupuncture:30 min Ear acupressure:1 session every 3 days with a total of 10 sessions
Body acupuncture: The first 5 days of treatment 1 time, 5 days after treatment 1, 1 month, for a course of treatment.

Li et al. 2006, China EA Sanginjao(SP6), Tianshu(ST25) Zusanli(ST36), Quchi(LI11)
Fenglong(ST40), Neiting(ST44)
Zhongwan(CV12), Pishu(BL20) Shenshu(BL23), Qihai(CV6) Yinlingquan(SP9), Shangjuxu(ST37) Taichong( LR3)
10 min 1 session daily with a total of 60 sessions, 2 days rest in-between 10 sessions
AAS Hunger point Pizhixia(AT4) Shenmen(TF4), Shenshangxian(TG2P) Sanjiao(CO17), Pi(CO13) Wei(CO14), Fei(CO14)
Kou(CO1), Dachang(CO7) Zhichangxiduan(HX2)
15-20 min 1 session daily with a total of 10 sessions for 10 weeks, 2 day rest in-between 10 sessions

Tong et al. 2011, China Acupuncture Zhongwan(CV12), Zhongji(CV3) Daheng(SP15), Xiawan(CV10) Shimen(CV5), Tianshu(ST25)
Liangqiu(ST34), Zusanli(ST36) Yinlingquan(SP9)
30 min 1 session every other day for a total of 5 weeks with 12 sessions

Hsu et al. 2009, Taiwan AAS Hunger point, Shenmen point(TF4) Stomach point(CO4),
Endocrine point(CO18)
3 days 2 sessions weekly for a total of 6 weeks with 12 sessions

Hsieh et al. 2010, Taiwan AAS NR 2/3 days 1 session weekly for 10 sessions

Hsieh et al. 2011, Taiwan AAS NR NR 1 session weekly for a total of eight weeks

Abdi et al. 2012, Iran AAS Shenmen(TF4), Stomach(CO4)
Hunger point Mouth(CO1)
Centre of ear(HX1), Sanjiao(CO17)
3 days Twice a week for a total of 6 weeks

Darbandi et al. 2012, Iran AAS Shenmen(TF4), Stomach(CO4) Hunger point Mouth(CO1) Centreof ear(HX1), Sanjiao(CO17) 3 days Twice a week for a total of 6 weeks

He et al. 2012, China AAS Hunger point Stomach(CO4)
Spleen(CO14), LargeIntestine(CO7)
Endocrine(CO18), Shenmen(TF4)
3 days 3 times a day for 4 weeks

Lien et al. 2012, Taiwan AAS Shenmen point(TF4), Stomach point(CO4)
Hunger point, Endocrine point(CO18)
NR 3 session weekly with a total of 12 sessions for 4 weeks
Placebo Shenmen point(TF4), Stomach point(CO4)
Hunger point, Endocrine point(CO18)
NR 3 sessions weekly with a total of 12 sessions for 4 weeks

Darbandi et al. 2014, Iran EA Tianshu (ST-25), Weidao(GB28)
Zhongwan(REN12), Shuifen(REN9) Guanyuan(REN4), Sanyinjiao(SP6) Quchi(LI11), Fenlong(ST40) Qihai(REN6), Yinlingquan (SP9)
20 min 2 sessions weekly for a total of 6 weeks
AAS Shenmen (TF4), Stomach (CO4)
Hunger point, Mouth (CO1)
Center of ear (HX1), Sanjiao (CO17)
3 days 2 sessions weekly for a total of 6 weeks

Yeh et al. 2015, Taiwan EA Shenmen (TF4), Stomach CO4) Endocrine (CO18)
Hunger point
20 min NR

Chen et al. 2007, China ACE Liangqiu(ST34), Zhongwan(CV12) Tianshu(ST25), Shuifen(CV9) Fenglong(ST40) A week 1 session weekly with a total of 30 sessions for 4 weeks
Acupuncture Liangqiu(ST34), Zhongwan(CV12) Tianshu(ST25), Shuifen(CV9) Fenglong(ST40) 45 min The first 5 days are 1 times a day, and 1 time after 5 days, 1 month is 1 course of treatment.

Huang et al. 2011, China ACE One set is Tianshu(ST25)
Zhongwan(CV12), Guanyuan(CV4)
Zusanli(ST36), Weishu(BL21)
Ashixue
24 hour 1 session weekly with a total of 7 sessions for 60 days
EA Zhongwan(CV12), Tianshu(ST25)
Daheng(SP15), Shuifen(CV9)
QIhai(CV6), Guanyuan(CV4)
Zusanli(ST36), Ashixue
30 min 3 sessions weekly with a total of 12 sessions for 60 days

Tang et al. 2009, China Combined therapies EA:
Zhongwan(CV12), Xiawan(CV10)
Guanyuan(CV4), Tianshu(ST25)
Shuifen(CV9), Sanyinjiao(SP6)
Zusanli(ST36), Xuehai(SP10)
Xinshu(BL15), Geshu(BL17) Pishu(BL20)
ACE:
Zhongwan(CV12), Tianshu(ST25)
Qihai(CV6), Tianshu(ST25)
Liangqiu(ST34), Zusanli(ST36)
Gongsun(SP4), Xinshu(BL15)
Pishu(BL20)
EA:30 min EA:The first 3 days are 1 times a day, and 1 time after 3 days, 15 days is 1 course of treatment.
ACE:After the first acupoint catgut embedding for 3 consecutive times, the interval is buried for the second time after 15 days, and the acupuncture is performed for the third time after the end of the treatment period.
EA Zhongwan(CV12), Xiawan(CV10)
Guanyuan(CV4), Tianshu(ST25)
Shuifen(CV9), Sanyinjiao(SP6)
Zusanli(ST36), Xuehai(SP10)
Xinshu(BL15), Geshu(BL17)
Pishu(BL20)
30 min The first 3 days are 1 times a day, and 1 time after 3 days, 15 days is 1 course of treatment.

Shi et al. 2006, China Combined therapies Zhongwan(CV12), Xiawan(CV10)
Qihai(CV6), Zhongji(CV3)
Tianshu(ST25), Daheng(SP15)
Liangmen(ST21), Huaroumen(ST24)
Shuidao(ST28), Quchi(CV6)
Zhigou(TE6), Hegu(LI4)
Liangqiu(ST34), Zusanlli(ST36)
Shangjuxu(ST37), Fenglong(ST40)
Sanyinjiao(SP6), Gongsun(SP4)
Neiting((ST44)
30 min EA:The first 3 days are 1 times a day, and 1 time after 3 days, 15 days is 1 course of treatment.
ACE: After the first acupoint catgut embedding for 3 consecutive times, the interval is buried for the second time after 15 days, and the acupuncture is performed for the third time after the end of the treatment period.
EA Zhongwan(CV12), Xiawan(CV10)
Qihai(CV6), Zhongji(CV3)
Tianshu(ST25), Daheng(SP15) Liangmen(ST21), Huaroumen(ST24) Shuidao(ST28), Quchi(CV6) Zhigou(TE6), Hegu(LI4)
Liangqiu(ST34), Zusanlli(ST36) Shangjuxu(ST37), Fenglong(ST40) Sanyinjiao(SP6), Gongsun(SP4) Neiting((ST44)
30 min The first 3 days are 1 times a day, and 1 time after 3 days, 15 days is 1 course of treatment.

Hsu et al. 2005, Taiwan EA Qihai (REN-6), Shuifen (REN-9) Shuidao (ST-28), Siman (K-14)
Zusanli (ST-26), Fenglong(ST-40)
Sanginjao (SP-6)
40 min 2 sessions weekly with a total of 12 sessions for 6 weeks

Güçel et al. 2012, Turkey Acupuncture Hegu(LI4), Shenmen(HT7)
Zusanli(ST36), Neiting(ST44) Sanyinjiao(SP6)
20 min 2 sessions weekly with a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks

Deng et al. 2014, China Combined therapies Zhongwan (CV 12), Xiawan(CV 10)
Qihai(CV 6), Guanyuan( CV4) Huaroumen (ST 24), Wailing ( ST 26)
Daheng (SP 15), Tianshu (ST 25)
Yinjiao (CV 7), Zhigou (TE 6)
Zusanll (ST 36)
NR Acupuncture:1 session every 3 days with a total of 21 sessions for 4 weeks, 3 days rest between every session
Acupoint catgut
Embedding:1 session weekly with a total of 3 sessions for 3 weeks
Acupuncture Zhongwan (CV 12), Xiawan(CV 10)
Qihai(CV 6), Guanyuan( CV4) Huaroumen (ST 24), Wailing ( ST 26)
Daheng (SP 15), Tianshu (ST 25)
30 min 1 session every 3 days with a total of 21 sessions for 4 weeks, 3 days rest between every session
Acupoint catgut embedding Zhongwan (CV 12), Tianshu (ST 25) Yinjiao (CV 7), Zhigou (TE 6) Guanyuan( CV4), Zusanli (ST 36) NR 1 session weekly with a total of 3 sessions for 3 weeks

Hassan et al. 2014, Egypt AR NR NR NR

He et al. 2014, China AR NR NR NR
acupuncture Tianshu (ST25), Liangmen(ST21) Daheng (SP15), Zusanli (ST36) Sanyinjiao(SP6), Quchi (LI11)
Zhigou (SJ6), Zhongwan(RN12)
Qihai (RN06)
30 min 1 session daily with a total of 21 sessions for 3 weeks

Wang et al. 2013, China EA Neiting(ST44), Shangjuxu(ST37)
Xiajuxu(ST39), Fenglong(ST40)
Tianshu(ST25), Zusanli(ST36)
Quchi(LI11)
30 min 1 session every 2 days with a total of 12 sessions for 3 weeks
Acupuncture Neiting(ST44), Shangjuxu(ST37)
Xiajuxu(ST39), Fenglong(ST40)
Tianshu(ST25), Zusanli(ST36)
Quchi(LI11)
30 min 1 session every 2 days with a total of 12 sessions for 3 weeks

Sujung et al. 2014, South Korea AAS Shen-men(TF4), Stomach(CO4) Spleen(CO13), Hunger point Endocrine(C018) NR 1 session weekly with a total of 8 sessions for 8 weeks

Bu et al. 2007, China Combined therapies Acupuncture:
Tianshu(ST25), Guanyuan(CV4) Zusanli(ST36), Fenglong(ST40) Sanyinjiao(SP6)
AAS:
Shenmen(TF4), Endocrine(C018) Spleen(CO13), Stomach(CO4) Dachang(CO7), Sanjiao(CO17 )
Naodian
Acupuncture:30 min
ear acupressure:1 day
1 session every day with a total of 10 sessions for 6 weeks, 1 week rest in-between 10 sessions.
Acupuncture Tianshu(ST25), Guanyuan(CV4) Zusanli(ST36), Fenglong(ST40) Sanyinjiao(SP6) 30 min 1 session every day with a total of 10 sessions for 6 weeks, 1 week rest in-between 10 sessions.

Shi et al. 2005, China Warming acupuncture Zhongwan(CV12), Shuifen(CV9) Qihai(CV6), Zhongji(CV3)
Tianshu(ST25), Shuidao(ST28) Neiguan(PC6), Hegu(LI4) Xuehai(SP10), Zusanli(ST36) Fenglong(ST40), Sanyinjiao(SP6)
40 min 1 session every day with a total of 15 sessions for 4 weeks
EA Zhongwan(CV12), Shuifen(CV9) Qihai(CV6), Zhongji(CV3)
Tianshu(ST25), Shuidao(ST28) Neiguan(PC6), Hegu(LI4) Xuehai(SP10), Zusanli(ST36) Fenglong(ST40), Sanyinjiao(SP6)
40 min 1 session every day with a total of 15 sessions for 4 weeks

Yang et al. 2010, China AR Zhongwan(CV12), Tianshu(ST25) Guanyuan(CV4), Zusanli(ST36) Fenglong(ST40), Yinlingquan(SP9) Sanyinjiao(SP6), Pishu(BL20) Weishu(BL21), Ashixue 30 min 1 session daily with a total of 15 sessions for 7 weeks, 3 days rest between every session

Cabioglu et al. 2005, Turkey EA Body points:
Hegu(LI 4), Tianshu(ST 25)
Quchi(LI 11), Zusanli(ST 36)
Neiting(ST 44
30 min Body EA was performed everyday, and EA was performed every other day

Cabioglu et al. 2006, Turkey EA Body points:
Quchi(LI 11), Zusanli(ST 36)
Neiting(ST 44)
30 min Body EA application was performed daily for 20 days, and EA was applied to each ear on alternating days

Cabioglu et al. 2008, Turkey EA Body points:
Hegu(LI 4), Quchi(LI 11)
Tianshu(ST 25)Zusanli(ST 36)
Taitong(Liv 3), Neiting(ST 44)
30 min Body EA application was performed daily for 20 days, and EA was applied to each ear on alternating days

Darbandi et al. 2013, Iran AR Inrervention group:
Tianshu(ST 25), Weidao(GB 28)
Zhongwan(RN 12), Shuifen(RN 9)
Guanyuan(RN 4), Sanyinjiao(SP 6)
Excess group:
Quchi(LI 11), Fenglong(ST 40)
Deficiency group:
Qihai(RN6), Yinlingquan(SP9)
20 min Two treatmennt per week for a total of 6 weeks(12 treatments)

Fogarty et al. 2015, Australia AR Hegu(LI 4), Quchi(LI 11)
Zusanli(ST 36), Neiting(ST 44)
Taichong(LR 3)
Auricular acupuncture:
Shenmen(TF4)
NR NR

LM: lifestyle modification; AAS: auricular acupoint stimulation; EA: electroacupuncture; ACE: acupoint catgut embedding; WA: warming acupuncture; AR: acupuncture and related therapies; #combination of acupuncture and related therapies.

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment.

Study Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding of participants and investigators Blinding of outcome assessment Incomplete outcome data addressed Selective outcome reporting
Allison et al. 1995, USA Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Hsu et al. 2005, Taiwan Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Richards et al. 1998, Australia Unclear risk Low risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
He et al. 2008, China Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Li et al. 2006, China Low risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Tong et al. 2011, China Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Hsu et al. 2009, Taiwan Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Hsieh et al. 2010, Taiwan Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk High risk Unclear risk
Hsieh et al. 2011, Taiwan Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Abdi et al 2012, Iran Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk High risk Unclear risk
Darbandi et al 2012, Iran Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
He et al 2012, China Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Unclear risk Unclear risk
Lien et al 2012, Taiwan Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk High risk Unclear risk
Darbandi et al 2014, Iran Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Yeh et al. 2015, Taiwan Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk High risk Unclear risk
Chen et al. 2007, China Low risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Huang et al. 2011, China Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Tang et al. 2009, China High risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Shi et al, 2006, China Low risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Unclear risk Unclear risk
Hsu et al. 2005, Taiwan Low risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Güçel et al. 2012, Turkey Low risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Deng et al. 2014, China Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Hassan et al. 2014, Egypt Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
He et al. 2014, China Low risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Wang et al. 2013, China High risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Sujung et al. 2014, South Korea Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Bu et al. 2007, China Low risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Shi et al. 2005, China Low risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Yang et al. 2010, China High risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Cabioglu et al. 2005, Turkey Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Cabioglu et al. 2006, Turkey Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Cabioglu et al. 2008, Turkey Unclear risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Darbandi et al. 2013, Iran Low risk Unclear risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk
Fogarty et al. 2015, Australia Unclear risk Low risk High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear risk

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Network plot. BMI: body mass index; LM: lifestyle modification; AAS: auricular acupoint stimulation; EA: electroacupuncture; ACE: acupoint catgut embedding; WA: warming acupuncture; AR: acupuncture and related therapies; combined therapies: combination of acupuncture and related therapies.

3.3. Pairwise Meta-Analyses

3.3.1. Body Weight

A direct pairwise meta-analysis showed that acupuncture and related therapies showed a greater BW reduction than lifestyle modification (MD: 1.66; 95% Confidence interval, 0.63to2.70) and placebo (MD: 1.15; 95% CI, 0.67to1.63). When compared to acupuncture, combination of acupuncture and related theories showed a marginally stronger effect in weight loss (MD: 1.56; 95% CI, 0.07to3.05). There was no statistically significant difference between combination of acupuncture and related theories and pharmacotherapy in their effectiveness in BW (MD: 2.44; 95% CI, -1.98to6.86). (Table 4)

Table 4.

Pairwise meta-analyses.

Comparison Pairwise OR (95% CI) Number of patients Number of studies Heterogeneity test
I2 (%) p value
Body weight
 AR vs. LM 1.66(0.63 to 2.70) 496 10 55 0.02
 AR vs. placebo 1.15(0.67 to 1.63) 833 14 65 0.0004
 Combines therapies vs. PHA 2.44(-1.98 to 6.86) 80 1 - -
 Acupuncture vs. related therapies 0.25(0.00 to 0.49) 413 6 0 0.73
 Combines therapies vs. acupuncture 1.56(0.07 to 3.05) 378 6 99 <0.00001
BMI
 AR vs. LM 1.17(0.09 to 2.26) 314 6 74 0.002
 AR vs. placebo 0.57(0.40 to 0.74) 830 12 63 0.002
 Combines therapies vs. PHA 0.48(-0.90 to 1.86) 80 1 - -
 Acupuncture vs. related therapies 0.13(-0.06 to 0.32) 325 5 0 0.8
 Combines therapies vs. acupuncture 0.77(-0.37 to 1.92) 158 4 88 <0.00001

BMI: body mass index; LM: lifestyle modification; PHA: pharmacotherapy; AR: acupuncture and related therapies.

BMI. As for the comparison in reducing BMI, acupuncture and related therapies were found to be marginally superior to lifestyle modification (MD: 1.17; 95% CI, 0.09to2.26) and placebo (MD: 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40to0.74). The remaining direct comparisons did not show significant differences (Table 4).

3.4. Network Meta-Analysis

3.4.1. Body Weight

The NMA showed that all treatments other than acupuncture combined lifestyle modification were more efficacious than lifestyle modification. Three treatments were significantly more effective than placebo. Specifically, acupoint catgut embedding (SMD: 1.26; 95% credible interval, 0.46to2.06), acupuncture (SMD: 2.72; 95% CrI, 0.06to5.29), and combination of acupuncture and related therapies (SMD: 3.65; 95% CrI, 0.96to6.94). Furthermore, moxibustion with warming needle was associated with a significantly improvement than lifestyle modification (SMD: -5.24; 95% CrI, -10.15to-0.55) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Results of network meta-analyses.

Body weight
AAS
-1.11 (-4.01, 1.71) ACE
0.72 (-0.93, 2.37) 1.82 (-1.08, 4.84) AR+LM
-1.45 (-4.11, 1.28) -0.36 (-1.82, 1.31) -2.16 (-4.94, 0.61) Acupuncture
-2.40 (-5.16, 0.35) -1.28 (-2.96, 0.39) -3.09 (-5.97, -0.33) -0.92 (-2.34, 0.30) Combined theories
-0.07 (-1.85, 1.74) 1.05 (-1.35, 3.48) -0.77 (-2.61, 1.03) 1.38 (-0.77, 3.57) 2.33 (0.17, 4.56) EA
1.80 (0.21, 3.41) 2.90 (0.16, 5.72) 1.09 (-0.27, 2.39) 3.26 (0.65, 5.88) 4.18 (1.62, 6.83) 1.85 (0.37, 3.37) LM
0.06 (-5.43, 5.46) 1.11 (-3.79, 6.23) -0.67 (-6.27, 4.70) 1.47 (-3.37, 6.35) 2.39 (-2.25, 7.16) 0.11 (-5.02, 5.13) -1.76 (-7.18, 3.51) Pharmacotherapy
1.26 (0.46, 2.06) 2.37 (-0.43, 5.18) 0.54 (-0.93, 2.03) 2.72 (0.06, 5.29) 3.65 (0.96, 6.34) 1.33 (-0.36, 2.96) -0.55 (-2.02, 0.90) 1.20 (-4.13, 6.63) Placebo
-3.47 (-8.46, 1.35) -2.31 (-7.69, 2.72) -4.18 (-9.22, 0.67) -1.99 (-7.32, 2.93) -1.04 (-6.34, 3.96) -3.40 (-8.10, 1.06) -5.24 (-10.15, -0.55) -3.50 (-10.48, 3.39) -4.72 (-9.77, 0.07) WA

BMI

AAS
-0.08 (-1.54, 1.42) ACE
0.96 (-0.08, 2.00) 1.03 (-0.58, 2.66) AR+LM
-0.64 (-1.48, 0.35) -0.54 (-1.88, 0.84) -1.59 (-2.71, -0.34) Acupuncture
-0.81 (-1.77, 0.12) -0.71 (-2.20, 0.70) -1.76 (-2.95, -0.62) -0.16 (-1.01, 0.43) Combined theories
0.04 (-0.68, 0.78) 0.12 (-1.20, 1.45) -0.92 (-1.88, 0.08) 0.67 (-0.11, 1.34) 0.84 (0.19, 1.58) EA
1.31 (0.36, 2.30) 1.40 (-0.18, 2.96) 0.34 (-0.36, 1.15) 1.94 (0.83, 3.00) 2.12 (1.07, 3.23) 1.28 (0.43, 2.11) LM
-0.31 (-2.14, 1.55) -0.21 (-2.34, 1.87) -1.26 (-3.21, 0.79) 0.33 (-1.46, 2.01) 0.51 (-1.06, 2.09) -0.35 (-2.10, 1.39) -1.62 (-3.54, 0.31) Pharmacotherapy
0.63 (0.25, 1.11) 0.72 (-0.71, 2.15) -0.32 (-1.28, 0.69) 1.28 (0.43, 2.05) 1.44 (0.64, 2.38) 0.60 (0.03, 1.22) -0.66 (-1.58, 0.26) 0.95 (-0.85, 2.78) Placebo

BMI: body mass index; LM: lifestyle modification; AAS: auricular acupoint stimulation; EA: electroacupuncture; ACE: acupoint catgut embedding; WA: warming acupuncture; AR: acupuncture and related therapies; combined therapies: combination of acupuncture and related therapies.

3.4.2. BMI

Four treatments showed superiority over placebo, including acupoint catgut embedding (SMD: 1.31; 95% CrI, 0.36to2.06), acupuncture (SMD: 1.94; 95% CrI, 0.83to3.00), combination of acupuncture and related theories (SMD: 3.65; 95% CrI, 0.96to6.94), and electroacupuncture (SMD: 1.28; 95% CrI, 0.43to2.11). Four treatments were significantly more effective than lifestyle modification, including acupoint catgut embedding (SMD: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.25to1.11), acupuncture (SMD: 1.28; 95% CrI, 0.43to2.06), combination of acupuncture and related theories (SMD: 1.44; 95% CrI, 0.64to2.38), and electroacupuncture (SMD: 0.60; 95% CrI, 0.03to1.22). Also, the combination of acupuncture and related theories and acupuncture alone were both superior to the acupuncture combined lifestyle modification in their ability to reduce body mass index (SMD = -1.76, 95% CrI =−2.96 to −0.62; SMD = −1.59, 95% CrI = −2.71to −0.34) (Table 5).

3.5. Ranking

3.5.1. Body Weight

Ranking of the different treatment methods was displayed Figure 3. The results suggested that, on the aspect of weight loss, combination of acupuncture and related therapies was ranked the optimal method, the best, (88.7%), followed by moxibustion with warming needle (87.8%), manual acupuncture (70.5%), acupoint catgut embedding (ACE,62.1%), auricular acupoint stimulation (AAS,48.3%), electro acupuncture (EA,46.3%), pharmacotherapy (41.9%), acupuncture combined lifestyle modification (AR+LM,31.2%), placebo acupuncture/sham acupuncture (16.8%), and lifestyle modification (LM,6.4%) which was ranked as the worst.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Surface under the cumulative ranking curves. LM: lifestyle modification; AAS: auricular acupoint stimulation; EA: electroacupuncture; ACE: acupoint catgut embedding; WA: warming acupuncture; AR: acupuncture and related therapies; combined therapies: combination of acupuncture and related therapies; PLA: placebo; PHA: pharmacotherapy.

3.5.2. BMI

The results suggested that, on the aspect of BMI, combination of acupuncture and related therapies was ranked the optimal method, the best, (90.2%), followed by manual acupuncture (83.3%), pharmacotherapy (64.7%), acupoint catgut embedding (58.6%), auricular acupoint stimulation (55.7%), electroacupuncture (52.1%), placebo acupuncture/sham acupuncture (25.1%), acupuncture combined lifestyle modification (16.9%), and lifestyle modification (3.4%) which was ranked as the worst.

3.6. Inconsistency Assessment

3.6.1. Body Weight

The Z test illustrates the inconsistency of the NMA specifically (Appendix 4). For the inconsistency test outcome of BW, 95% CI of 8 loops was included 0, which reflected that no significant inconsistency was found. However, another 2 loops (ACE-Acupuncture-Combined therapies; ACE-Combined theories-EA) were found statistical inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons.

3.6.2. BMI

For the inconsistency test outcome of body mass index, 95% CI of all loops (acupuncture -combined theories-EA; acupuncture-EA-placebo; AR+LM -EA- LM-placebo; ACE-acupuncture-EA; AAS-EA-LM; AAS-AR+LM-LM-placebo; AAS-EA-placebo) were included 0, which reflected that no significant inconsistency was found.

3.7. Safety

Ten RCTs [2628, 31, 32, 35, 36, 38, 39, 45] reported adverse events, while no major complications were noticed in all included studies. Three included studies [35, 36, 39] reported that no adverse effects were noted in both experimental group and placebo group. In one included RCT, there were two patients reporting mild ecchymosis and one abdominal discomfort case reported as adverse events after electroacupuncture treatment; no case was reported in the lifestyle modification group [27]. In another study, there were seven subjects in group auricular acupoint stimulation and two subjects in group placebo had mild tenderness [32].

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to identify the efficacy and safety of acupoint stimulation therapy for obesity. In this NMA, the association of each acupuncture and related therapies with relative weight loss was compared by the combination of direct and indirect evidence from 34 RCTs in 2283 obese patients.

This study has three key findings. First, ranking graphs of the primary outcome suggested that the combination of acupuncture and related therapies was the most effective in losing weight and improving BMI. Second, compared with placebo or sham acupuncture, combination of acupuncture-related therapies, manual acupuncture, acupoint catgut embedding, auricular acupuncture therapy, and electroacupuncture are all associated with higher odds of achieving weight loss. Third, combination of acupuncture and related therapies, manual acupuncture, pharmacotherapy, acupoint catgut embedding, auricular acupoint stimulation, and electroacupuncture were superior to lifestyle intervention.

Lifestyle modification, like diet intervention and physical activity, is recommended as safe and effective way to lose weight [60]. Results of direct and indirect evidence suggest acupuncture and related theories had significant beneficial effects in dealing with obesity compared with lifestyle modification. Both experimental and clinical data prove the efficacy of acupuncture for obesity [61]. Experimental data suggests that acupuncture exerts beneficial effects on weight loss [62, 63]. The majority of clinical evidence suggests that acupuncture and related therapies reduced more weight than sham control group [26, 28, 31, 32], which are consistent with our results. Previous animal studies have observed that the expression of obesity-related peptides was upregulated in the hypothalamus after acupuncture treatment, which induced less food intake and weight loss [62, 64, 65]. Similarly, significant decreases in plasma leptin level were observed after EA treatment in obese patients [46]. With regard to insulin level, several experimental studies reported that EA can improve insulin sensitivity [66, 67]. However, results from clinical trials regarding insulin levels are controversial. Cabioğlu MT reported that EA increased insulin level compared with control group [56], but Gucel F indicated that acupuncture decreased insulin level [46]. As to effects on lipid metabolism, acupuncture was reported to be effective in decreasing total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG) and LDL-C concentrations [68, 69] of obese rat. Significant decreases in TC [55], TG [35], and LDL-C [55] were observed whereas no changes in HDL-C [55] levels were observed in clinical trials. Furthermore, experimental studies suggest that there was significant decrease in serum TNFα after EA [70]. Except for the noted mechanisms, EA can also induce white adipose tissue (WAT) browning via increasing uncoupling protein-1 (UCP1) gene expression [71].

This NMA has several attractive advantages. We focused on simple obesity patients without complication, which decreased the heterogeneity and improve the quality of this study. In addition, we compared acupuncture and acupuncture-related therapies with the first-line treatment for obesity-lifestyle modification with a Bayesian framework. The rank test of effectiveness provides data to favour acupuncture and acupuncture-related therapies. Lastly, we conducted a comprehensive search and included all eligible studies. We compared five different acupuncture treatments (manual acupuncture; electro acupuncture; auricular acupoint stimulation; acupoint catgut embedding; moxibustion with warming needle) in the clinical effectiveness in treating patients with obesity.

However, this study has several limitations. First, we failed to evaluate the safety of each acupoint stimulation therapy due to the limited data in primary studies. Future trials should report adverse events clearly to improve the quality of study design. Second, unaddressed concerns still exist regarding the long-term effects of using acupuncture and acupuncture-related therapies on weight management in a clinical setting. The duration of acupuncture sessions and follow-up duration of most included trials ranging from four weeks to twelve weeks. Further clinical evaluation of acupuncture for obesity with longer follow-up appears warranted. Third, blinding of patients and researches was not applied among included studies and the included trials were mainly conducted in China, which may lead to publication bias [72]. Fourth, included study in our NMA lack of research compares the effectiveness between acupuncture, pharmacotherapy, and different types of combination of acupuncture. Further confirmatory comparative effectiveness trials should compare different types of combination of acupuncture. Except one study compared acupuncture and pharmacotherapy [29], additional research is needed to further explore. Finally, we use R-value to estimate the changes in standard deviations (SD), which might enlarge the SD compared with the originals values.

Overall, our results indicate that combination of acupuncture and related therapies ranks as the optimal method for reducing both weight and BMI. Further studies will clarify which combination of acupuncture and related therapies is better.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (nos. 81674081 and 81804165), 2015 Special Project in the TCM State Industry Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People's Republic of China (no. 201507003), Young Elite Scientist Sponsors Hip Program by CAST (no. 2017QNRC001), Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion Research Team Project (no. 2017ZXZ004), and Science and Technology Program of Hubei, China (no. 2016CFB221).

Contributor Information

Zhongyu Zhou, Email: 2209447940@qq.com.

Wei Huang, Email: huangwei@hbhtcm.com.

Data Availability

All data used to support the findings of this study are included within the supplementary information files.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

Authors' Contributions

Yanji Zhang, Jia Li, and Guoyan Mo contributed equally to this work. Wei Huang, Zhongyu Zhou, and Yanji Zhang contributed to study design. Xianglin Chen, Hui Liu, and Teng Cai contributed to study selection. Xiangmin Tian, Teng Cai, Xian Zhang, and Xianglin Chen contributed to data collection and quality assessment. Figures 13 were prepared by Jia Li and Jing Liu. Tables 15 were prepared by Guoyan Mo. Appendices 14 were prepared by Jia Li. Huisheng Yang and Teng Cai were responsible for technical and language support. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 1: the PRISMA-NMA checklist treatment groups for included studies in a network meta-analysis. Appendix 2: search strategies for RCTs on acupuncture for obesity. Appendix 3: summaries of mean, standard difference, and sample size between treatment groups for included studies in a network meta-analysis. Appendix 4: inconsistency test.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Fact Sheet Obesity and Over-weight 2013. [WWW document], http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/#, (accessed August 2014)
  • 2.Garvey W. T., Mechanick J. I., Brett E. M., et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity. Endocrine Practice. 2016;22:1–203. doi: 10.4158/EP161365.GL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ogden C. L., Carroll M. D., Kit B. K., Flegal K. M. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;311(8):806–814. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xu W., Zhang H., Paillard-Borg S., Zhu H., Qi X., Rizzuto D. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among Chinese adults: Role of adiposity indicators and age. Obesity Facts. 2016;9(1):17–28. doi: 10.1159/000443003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cawley J., Meyerhoefer C. The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. Journal of Health Economics. 2012;31(1):219–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dalle Grave R., Calugi S., El Ghoch M. Lifestyle modification in the management of obesity: Achievements and challenges. Eating and Weight Disorders. 2013;18(4):339–349. doi: 10.1007/s40519-013-0049-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khera R., Murad M. H., Chandar A. K., et al. Association of pharmacological treatments for obesity withweight loss and adverse events a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2016;315(22):2424–2434. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schauer P. R., Kashyap S. R., Wolski K., et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366(17):1567–1576. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ikramuddin S., Korner J., Lee W.-J., et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs intensive medical management for the control of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia: the diabetes surgery study randomized clinical trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2013;309(21):2240–2249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reis L. O., Favaro W. J., Barreiro G. C., et al. Erectile dysfunction and hormonal imbalance in morbidly obese male is reversed after gastric bypass surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Andrology. 2010;33(5):736–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01017.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gloy V. L., Briel M., Bhatt D. L., et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal. 2013;347(5) doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fang S., Wang M., Zheng Y., Zhou S., Ji G. Acupuncture and lifestyle modification treatment for obesity: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2017;45(02):1–16. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X1750015X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yeh T.-L., Chen H.-H., Pai T.-P., et al. The effect of auricular acupoint stimulation in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2017;2017:16. doi: 10.1155/2017/3080547.3080547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guo T., Ren Y., Kou J., Shi J., Tianxiao S., Liang F. Acupoint catgut embedding for obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2015;2015:20. doi: 10.1155/2015/401914.401914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chaimani A., Higgins J. P. T., Mavridis D., Spyridonos P., Salanti G. Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salanti G., Del Giovane C., Chaimani A., Caldwell D. M., Higgins J. P., Tu Y. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hutton B., Salanti G., Caldwell D. M., et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: Checklist and explanations. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015;162(11):777–784. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2011, http://www.cochrane.org/training/cochrane-handbook. [DOI]
  • 19.Abrams K. R., Gillies C. L., Lambert P. C. Meta-analysis of heterogeneously reported trials assessing change from baseline. Statistics in Medicine. 2005;24(24):3823–3844. doi: 10.1002/sim.2423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Higgins J. P. T., Altman D. G., Gøtzsche P. C., et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. British Medical Journal. 2011;343(24) doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Higgins J. P. T., Thompson S. G., Deeks J. J., Altman D. G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal. 2003;327(7414):557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ades A. E., Sculpher M., Sutton A., et al. Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis. PharmacoEconomics. 2006;24(1):1–19. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624010-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lu G., Ades A. E. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine. 2004;23(20):3105–3124. doi: 10.1002/sim.1875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.van Valkenhoef G., Lu G., de Brock B., Hillege H., Ades A. E., Welton N. J. Automating network meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. 2012;3(4):285–299. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Salanti G., Ades A. E., Ioannidis J. P. A. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011;64(2):163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Allison D. B., Kreibich K., Heshka S. A randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial of an acupressure device for weight loss. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 1995;19(9):653–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hsu C.-H., Hwang K.-C., Chao C.-L., Lin J.-G., Kao S.-T., Chou P. Effects of electroacupuncture in reducing weight and waist circumference in obese women: a randomized crossover trial. International Journal of Obesity. 2005;29(11):1379–1384. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Richards D., Marley J. Stimulation of auricular acupuncture points in weight loss. Australian Family Physician. 1998;2(27):S73–S77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.He L., Gao X.-L., Deng H.-X., Zhao Y.-X. Effects of acupuncture on body mass index and waist-hip ratio in the patient of simple obesity. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2008;28(2):95–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li L., Wang Z.-Y. Clinical therapeutic effects of body acupuncture and ear acupuncture on juvenile simple obesity and effects on metabolism of blood lipids. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2006;26(3):173–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tong J., Chen J. X., Zhang Z. Q., et al. Clinical observation on simple obesity treated by acupuncture. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2011;31(8):679–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hsu C.-H., Wang C.-J., Hwang K.-C., Lee T.-Y., Chou P., Chang H.-H. The effect of auricular acupuncture in obese women: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Women's Health. 2009;18(6):813–818. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hsieh C. H. The effects of auricular acupressure on weight loss and serum lipid levels in overweight adolescents. American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2010;38(4):675–682. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X10008147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hsieh C. H., Su T.-J., Fang Y.-W., Chou P.-H. Effects of auricular acupressure on weight reduction and abdominal obesity in asian young adults: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2011;39(3):433–440. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X11008932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Abdi H., Abbasi-Parizad P., Zhao B., et al. Effects of auricular acupuncture on anthropometric, lipid profile, inflammatory, and immunologic markers: a randomized controlled trial study. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2012;18(7):668–677. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Darbandi M., Darbandi S., Mobarhan M. G., et al. Effects of auricular acupressure combined with low-Calorie diet on the leptin hormone in obese and overweight iranian individuals. Acupuncture in Medicine. 2012;30(3):208–213. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2011-010121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.He W., Zhou Z., Li J., Wang L., Zhu B., Litscher G. Auricular acupressure plus exercise for treating primary obese women: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Medical Acupuncture. 2012;24(4):227–232. doi: 10.1089/acu.2012.0881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lien C. Y., Liao L. L., Chou P., Hsu C. H. Effects of auricular stimulation on obese women: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. European Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2012;4(1):e45–e53. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2011.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Darbandi M., Darbandi S., Owji A. A., et al. Auricular or body acupuncture: Which one is more effective in reducing abdominal fat mass in Iranian men with obesity: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders. 2014;13(1) doi: 10.1186/s40200-014-0092-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yeh M.-L., Chu N.-F., Hsu M.-Y. F., Hsu C.-C., Chung Y.-C. Acupoint stimulation on weight reduction for obesity: a randomized sham-controlled study. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2015;37(12):1517–1530. doi: 10.1177/0193945914548707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen F., Wu S., Zhang Y. Effect of acupoint catgut embedding on TNF-alpha and insulin resistance in simple obesity patients. Acupuncture Research. 2007;32(1):49–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huang L.-C., Pan W.-Y. Comparation of effect and cost-benefit analysis between acupoint catgut-embedding and electroacupuncture on simple obesity. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2011;31(10):883–886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tang C.-L., Dai D.-C., Zhao G.-F., Zhu W.-F., Mei L.-F. Clinical observation on electroacupuncture combined with catgut implantation at acupoints for treatment of simple obesity of heart and spleen deficiency type. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2009;29(9):703–707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shi Y., Zhang L.-S., Zhao C., He C.-Q. Comparison of therapeutic effects of acupuncture-cupping plus acupoint catgut embedding and electroacupuncture on simple obesity of stomach and intestine excess-heat type. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2006;26(8):547–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hsu C.-H., Hwang K.-C., Chao C.-L., Chang H.-H., Chou P. Electroacupuncture in obese women: A randomized, controlled pilot study. Journal of Women's Health. 2005;14(5):434–440. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gucel F., Bahar B., Demirtas C., Mit S., Cevik C. Influence of acupuncture on leptin, ghrelin, insulin and cholecystokinin in obese women: a randomised, sham-controlled preliminary trial. Acupuncture in Medicine. 2012;30(3):203–207. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2012-010127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Deng L., Lun Z., Ma X., Zhou J. Clinical observation on regulating the three energizer by acupoint catgut embedding combined with abdominal acupuncture in treating abdominal obesity: a randomized controlled trial. World Journal of Acupuncture - Moxibustion. 2014;24(4):29–34. doi: 10.1016/S1003-5257(15)60025-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hassan N. E., El-Masry S. A., Elshebini S. M., et al. Comparison of three protocols: Dietary therapy and physical activity, acupuncture, or laser acupuncture in management of obese females. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014;7(2):191–197. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.He J., Zhang X., Qu Y., et al. Effect of combined manual acupuncture and massage on body weight and body mass index reduction in obese and overweight women: a randomized, short-term clinical trial. Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies. 2015;8(2):61–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2014.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang Y. L., Cao X., Liu Z. C., Xu B. Observation on the therapeutic effect of electroacupuncture on simple obesity of gastrointestinal heat pattern/syndrome. World Journal of Acupuncture - Moxibustion. 2013;23(2):1–5. doi: 10.1016/S1003-5257(13)60035-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yeo S., Kim K. S., Lim S. Randomised clinical trial of five ear acupuncture points for the treatment of overweight people. Acupuncture in Medicine. 2014;32(2):132–138. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2013-010435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bu T. W., Tian X. L., Wang S. J., et al. Comparison and analysis of therapeutic effects of different therapies on simple obesity. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2007;27(5):337–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shi Y., Zhang L.-S., Zhao C., Zuo X.-Y. Controlled study of needle warming therapy and electroacupuncture on simple obesity of spleen deficiency type. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2005;25(7):465–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yang J.-J., Xing H.-J., Xiao H.-L., Li Q., Li M., Wang S.-J. Effects of acupuncture combined with diet adjustment and aerobic exercise on weight and waist-hip ratio in simple obesity patients. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2010;30(7):555–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cabıoğlu M. T., Ergene N. Electroacupuncture therapy for weight loss reduces serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol levels in obese women. American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2005;33(4):525–533. doi: 10.1142/s0192415x05003132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cabioglu M. T., Ergene N. Changes in levels of serum insulin, C-peptide and glucose after electroacupuncture and diet therapy in obese women. American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2006;34(3):367–376. doi: 10.1142/s0192415x06003904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cabioglu M. T., Gündoğan N., Ergene N. The efficacy of electroacupuncture therapy for weight loss changes plasma lipoprotein A, Apolipoprotein A and Apolipoprotein B levels in obese women. American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2008;36(6):1029–1039. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X08006430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Darbandi S., Darbandi M., Mokarram P. Effects of body electroacupuncture on plasma leptin concentrations in obese and overweight people in Iran: a randomized controlled trial. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. 2013;19(2):24–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fogarty S., Stojanovska L., Harris D., Zaslawski C., Mathai M. L., McAinch A. J. A randomised cross-over pilot study investigating the use of acupuncture to promote weight loss and mental health in overweight and obese individuals participating in a weight loss program. Eating and Weight Disorders. 2015;20(3):379–387. doi: 10.1007/s40519-014-0175-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Garvey W. T., Mechanick J. I., Brett E. M., et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity: Executive summary. Endocrine Practice. 2016;22(7):842–884. doi: 10.4158/EP161356.ESGL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Belivani M., Dimitroula C., Katsiki N., Apostolopoulou M., Cummings M., Hatzitolios A. I. Acupuncture in the treatment of obesity: a narrative review of the literature. Acupuncture in Medicine. 2013;31(1):88–97. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2012-010247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tian D.-R., Li X.-D., Wang F., et al. Up-regulation of the expression of cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide by electroacupuncture in the arcuate nucleus of diet-induced obese rats. Neuroscience Letters. 2005;383(1-2):17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tian N., Wang F., Tian D.-R., et al. Electroacupuncture suppresses expression of gastric ghrelin and hypothalamic NPY in chronic food restricted rats. Peptides. 2006;27(9):2313–2320. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang F., Tian D. R., Tso P., Han J. S. Arcuate nucleus of hypothalamus is involved in mediating the satiety effect of electroacupuncture in obese rats. Peptides. 2011;32(12):2394–2399. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liu Z., Sun F., Su J., et al. Study on action of acupuncture on ventromedial nucleus of hypothalamus in obese rats. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2001;21(3):220–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lin J.-G., Chen W.-C., Hsieh C.-L., et al. Multiple sources of endogenous opioid peptide involved in the hypoglycemic response to 15 Hz electroacupuncture at the Zhongwan acupoint in rats. Neuroscience Letters. 2004;366(1):39–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Higashimura Y., Shimoju R., Maruyama H., Kurosawa M. Electro-acupuncture improves responsiveness to insulin via excitation of somatic afferent fibers in diabetic rats. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical. 2009;150(1-2):100–103. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wang S., Li Q., She Y., et al. Effect of electroacupuncture on metabolism of lipids in rats of obesity induced by sodium glutamate. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2005;25(4):269–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang S. J., Xu H. Z., Xiao H. L. Effect of high-frequency electroacupuncture on lipid metabolism in obesity rats. Acupuncture Research. 2008;33(3):154–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yang H., Li Y., Cheng L., He J.-S. Effect of electroacupuncture and diet adjusting on insulin resistance in rats with nutrition obesity. Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine. 2007;5(5):546–549. doi: 10.3736/jcim20070514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shen W., Wang Y., Lu S.-F., et al. Acupuncture promotes white adipose tissue browning by inducing UCP1 expression on DIO mice. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2014;14(1):54–59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Page M. J., Higgins J. P., Clayton G., et al. Empirical evidence of study design biases in randomized trials: systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):5–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 1: the PRISMA-NMA checklist treatment groups for included studies in a network meta-analysis. Appendix 2: search strategies for RCTs on acupuncture for obesity. Appendix 3: summaries of mean, standard difference, and sample size between treatment groups for included studies in a network meta-analysis. Appendix 4: inconsistency test.

Data Availability Statement

All data used to support the findings of this study are included within the supplementary information files.


Articles from Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES