Skip to main content
Journal of Thoracic Disease logoLink to Journal of Thoracic Disease
editorial
. 2018 Sep;10(Suppl 26):S3100–S3102. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.83

A novel desmin mutation causing severe left ventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

George Bazoukis 1, Konstantinos P Letsas 1, Yunlong Xia 2, Gary Tse 3,4,5,✉, Ka Hou Christien Li 3,4,6,✉
PMCID: PMC6186622  PMID: 30370089

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (AC) is a hereditary disorder characterized by degeneration of cardiomyocytes and their subsequent replacement by fat and fibrous tissue mainly, but not exclusively, in the right ventricle (RV) (1-3). Such changes lead to conduction abnormalities that provide the substrate for arrhythmogenesis (4,5). It is most frequently inherited in an autosomal dominant manner and is usually associated with mutations in genes encoding for desmosomal proteins (6,7), although non-desmosomal and ion channels gene mutations have also been described (8-10). Diagnosis is made according to the 2010 modified Task Force Criteria (11) and the average risk of ventricular arrhythmia can be very high, ranging from 3.7% to 10.6% per year depending on the specific AC population (12). The initial reported cases of AC affected exclusively the RV (13). However, over the recent years, cases of AC involving both ventricles or indeed only the left ventricle (LV) have been reported (14-17). Risk stratification of asymptomatic patients, however, remains a significant unresolved clinical problem. Consequently, the specific population who is at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and therefore will be benefit from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation is not well determined. A recent meta-analysis concluded that male gender, unexplained syncope, the extent of T-wave inversion, right ventricular dysfunction and previously documented VT/VF were significantly associated with higher risks of ventricular arrhythmias in AC patients (12). In addition to these established risk factors, strenuous exercise and inducibility of arrhythmia at electrophysiological studies also confer a higher arrhythmic risk even in borderline AC patients. Moreover, the presence of symptoms was linked to adverse outcomes in mutation carriers (12). However, reduced LV ejection fraction was not apparently associated with increased arrhythmic risk in definite and borderline AC patients (12).

Regarding the genetic basis of AC, an increasing number of AC-associated genes have been discovered with the expanding use of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques in cardiovascular genetics. However, the molecular pathogenic mechanisms causing the AC-related desmin (DES) mutation phenotype remain unknown. The existing data shows an association of DES mutations with restrictive or dilated cardiomyopathy with conduction abnormalities or skeletal muscle disorders (18,19).

In a recent article published in the journal Circulation, Bermúdez-Jiménez et al. demonstrated the pathogenicity of the novel DES mutation p.Glu401Asp in a large family with an inherited LV-dominant AC and a high incidence of adverse clinical events (20). This study evaluated 66 family members of Spanish origins across six generation and identified a new variant not previously described in the existing public databases. Genetically sequencing for DES-p.Glu401Asp revealed 23 members with the mutation. There were 8 additional non-tested individuals; 6 who died before sequencing and considered obligate carriers and 2 with a history of SCD, giving a total of 31 affected individuals. Furthermore, the genotype correlated well with phenotype after performing co-segregation analysis. An interesting finding was that primary myocardial disease was present in 100% of carriers while non-carriers did not show traces of cardiomyopathy. The mutation carriers were mainly asymptomatic (65.2%) at presentation while four patients presented with palpitations, three with heart failure symptoms and one with syncope. Bermúdez-Jiménez et al. showed that abnormal electrocardiographic findings were common in 97% of the mutation carriers (negative T-waves in inferior and antero-lateral leads (V2–V6), wider QRS complex, longer S wave duration, generalized low voltage and presence of Q wave), whilst in Holter recordings, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia was found in 32% of carriers and high density ventricular ectopy in 23% of the cases. There were no statistical significant differences in PR duration or frequency of epsilon wave or sinus rhythm between carriers and cases. Another interesting finding was that the missense DES-p.Glu401Asp mutation was not correlated with skeletal myopathy or abnormal creatine kinase levels. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance studies showed a near-exclusive LV affection, with hypokinesia localized on the mid-apical inferolateral wall of the LV, mildly depressed LV ejection fraction and no ventricular dilation while RV involvement was demonstrated only in 5 cases who presented concomitant moderate/severe LV ejection fraction impairment. During follow-up, a high incidence of cardiac events (39%) was noticed (4 SCD, 2 heart transplantations, 2 heart failure deaths and 1 atrioventricular block). This study also confirmed a higher prevalence of cardiac events in males, a finding that is also observed in other DES mutations.

DES mutations are known to influence the alpha-helical structures with deleterious consequences as the conformation of these helices is critical for desmin filament assembly and stability (21). The authors showed that the p.Glu401Asp mutation influences segment 2B of the central rod domain of desmin. However, it was not associated with conduction abnormalities or skeletal muscle disturbances, highlighting the role of aspartic acid in position 401 that gives rise to the specific phenotype. However, cell cultures showed that p.Glu401Asp mutation disrupted the intermediate filament structure in the transiently transfected cells in a manner similar to the p.Glu401Lys mutation (20). Another unique and important aspect of this study was the correlation of the p.Glu401Asp mutation with histological findings. Specifically, degenerative changes in the subepicardial myocardium, increased deposition of disorganized collagen fibers, the presence of infiltrating adipose tissue and groups of cardiomyocytes showing degenerative changes without inflammatory reaction. In the rest of the myocardium, the tissue organization was preserved but irregular cell thickness, increased perinuclear space, less density and less prominent intercalary discs of sarcoplasm, fewer and poorly organized contractile myofibrils were observed. Important functional proteins of cell-cell junctional complexes were preserved in mutation carriers but desmoplakin and plakoglobin were weakly stained as compared to controls. Cell cultures isolated from patients with the DES mutation and mild symptomatology showed similar cell morphology, but a slower growth and proliferation. Moreover, cell cultures from the index patient showed a typical mesenchymal morphology but a slower and different growth pattern. Furthermore, cells carrying the DES-p.Glu401Asp did not reveal higher DES expression after cardiomyogenic differentiation while over 30 genes encoding for a variety of potassium and sodium channels were found to be down- or up-regulated compared to healthy control samples.

In conclusion, the authors described for the first time a DES mutation in an LV dominant AC presenting without the specific conduction abnormalities known to occur in other DES mutations, or skeletal muscle disturbance that is associated with high incidence of arrhythmic events particularly in males. Detection of this specific mutation can help risk-stratify patients more precisely than with symptomatology and imaging alone. However, further research is needed for more accurate risk stratification strategies in this specific patient population to elucidate the group at high risk of malignant arrhythmias that will benefit from an ICD for primary prevention of SCD.

Acknowledgements

G Tse thanks the Croucher Foundation of Hong Kong for his Clinical Assistant Professorship Award.

Provenance: This is an invited Editorial commissioned by the Section Editor Fang-Zhou Liu (Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, China).

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Mallat Z, Tedgui A, Fontaliran F, et al. Evidence of apoptosis in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1190-6. 10.1056/NEJM199610173351604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Angelini A, Basso C, Nava A, et al. Endomyocardial biopsy in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 1996;132:203-6. 10.1016/S0002-8703(96)90416-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li KHC, Bazoukis G, Liu T, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) in clinical practice. J Arrhythm 2017;34:11-22. 10.1002/joa3.12021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Choy L, Yeo JM, Tse V, et al. Cardiac disease and arrhythmogenesis: Mechanistic insights from mouse models. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2016;12:1-10. 10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tse G, Yeo JM. Conduction abnormalities and ventricular arrhythmogenesis: The roles of sodium channels and gap junctions. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2015;9:75-82. 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.10.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Haugaa KH, Haland TF, Leren IS, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis. Europace 2016;18:965-72. 10.1093/europace/euv340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ohno S. The genetic background of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J Arrhythm 2016;32:398-403. 10.1016/j.joa.2016.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ortiz-Genga MF, Cuenca S, Dal Ferro M, et al. Truncating FLNC Mutations Are Associated With High-Risk Dilated and Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2440-51. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Milting H, Klauke B, Christensen AH, et al. The TMEM43 Newfoundland mutation p.S358L causing ARVC-5 was imported from Europe and increases the stiffness of the cell nucleus. Eur Heart J 2015;36:872-81. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Merner ND, Hodgkinson KA, Haywood AF, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy type 5 is a fully penetrant, lethal arrhythmic disorder caused by a missense mutation in the TMEM43 gene. Am J Hum Genet 2008;82:809-21. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the Task Force Criteria. Eur Heart J 2010;31:806-14. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bosman LP, Sammani A, James CA, et al. Predicting arrhythmic risk in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm 2018. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.01.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Burke AP, Farb A, Tashko G, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and fatty replacement of the right ventricular myocardium: are they different diseases? Circulation 1998;97:1571-80. 10.1161/01.CIR.97.16.1571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lindstrom L, Nylander E, Larsson H, et al. Left ventricular involvement in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy - a scintigraphic and echocardiographic study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2005;25:171-7. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2005.00607.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.El Ghannudi S, Nghiem A, Germain P, et al. Left ventricular involvement in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy - a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. Clin Med Insights Cardiol 2015;8:27-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sen-Chowdhry S, Syrris P, Prasad SK, et al. Left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: an under-recognized clinical entity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2175-87. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tse G, Ali A, Prasad SK, et al. Atypical case of post-partum cardiomyopathy: an overlap syndrome with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy? BJR Case Rep 2015;1:20150182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Taylor MR, Slavov D, Ku L, et al. Prevalence of desmin mutations in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2007;115:1244-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Arbustini E, Pasotti M, Pilotto A, et al. Desmin accumulation restrictive cardiomyopathy and atrioventricular block associated with desmin gene defects. Eur J Heart Fail 2006;8:477-83. 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bermúdez-Jiménez FJ, Carriel V, Brodehl A, et al. Novel Desmin Mutation p.Glu401Asp Impairs Filament Formation, Disrupts Cell Membrane Integrity, and Causes Severe Arrhythmogenic Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia. Circulation 2018;137:1595-610. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goudeau B, Rodrigues-Lima F, Fischer D, et al. Variable pathogenic potentials of mutations located in the desmin alpha-helical domain. Hum Mutat 2006;27:906-13. 10.1002/humu.20351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Thoracic Disease are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

RESOURCES