Skip to main content
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 2018 Aug 30;37(20):e99084. doi: 10.15252/embj.201899084

Endolysosomal degradation of Tau and its role in glucocorticoid‐driven hippocampal malfunction

João Vaz‐Silva 1,2,3, Patrícia Gomes 1,2,, Qi Jin 3,, Mei Zhu 3,, Viktoriya Zhuravleva 3,4,, Sebastian Quintremil 3, Torcato Meira 1,2,5, Joana Silva 1,2, Chrysoula Dioli 1,2, Carina Soares‐Cunha 1,2, Nikolaos P Daskalakis 6, Nuno Sousa 1,2, Ioannis Sotiropoulos 1,2,, Clarissa L Waites 3,5,‡,
PMCID: PMC6187216  PMID: 30166454

Abstract

Emerging studies implicate Tau as an essential mediator of neuronal atrophy and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet the factors that precipitate Tau dysfunction in AD are poorly understood. Chronic environmental stress and elevated glucocorticoids (GC), the major stress hormones, are associated with increased risk of AD and have been shown to trigger intracellular Tau accumulation and downstream Tau‐dependent neuronal dysfunction. However, the mechanisms through which stress and GC disrupt Tau clearance and degradation in neurons remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that Tau undergoes degradation via endolysosomal sorting in a pathway requiring the small GTPase Rab35 and the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery. Furthermore, we find that GC impair Tau degradation by decreasing Rab35 levels, and that AAV‐mediated expression of Rab35 in the hippocampus rescues GC‐induced Tau accumulation and related neurostructural deficits. These studies indicate that the Rab35/ESCRT pathway is essential for Tau clearance and part of the mechanism through which GC precipitate brain pathology.

Keywords: endolysosomal, ESCRT, glucocorticoid, Rab35, Tau

Subject Categories: Membrane & Intracellular Transport, Neuroscience

Introduction

Intraneuronal accumulation of Tau protein represents a central pathogenic process in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is hypothesized to mediate the detrimental effects of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) on neuronal function and cognitive performance (Roberson et al, 2007; Ittner et al, 2010; Guo et al, 2017). Tau accumulation and hyperphosphorylation is linked to synaptic atrophy, neuronal dysfunction, and cognitive deficits (Kimura et al, 2007; Yin et al, 2016), and triggers these events by disrupting axonal trafficking (Vossel et al, 2010), promoting GluN2B‐related excitotoxicity (Ittner et al, 2010; Zempel et al, 2010), and suppressing nuclear CREB‐mediated synthesis of synapse‐ and memory‐related proteins (Yin et al, 2016), among other effects. Furthermore, emerging studies support a crucial role for Tau in diverse brain pathologies (for review, see Sotiropoulos et al, 2017) including prolonged exposure to stressful conditions, a known risk factor for AD and major depressive disorder (Vyas et al, 2016). In particular, recent studies demonstrate that exposure to chronic environmental stress or the major stress hormones, glucocorticoids (GC), triggers the accumulation of Tau and its synaptic missorting, precipitating dendritic atrophy and synaptic dysfunction in a Tau‐dependent manner (Pinheiro et al, 2015; Lopes et al, 2016a,b; Pallas‐Bazarra et al, 2016; Dioli et al, 2017). However, the cellular mechanisms responsible for stress/GC‐induced accumulation of Tau remain unclear.

A major cause of Tau accumulation is the dysfunction of its degradative pathways (Khanna et al, 2016). Tau degradation has been shown to occur through two distinct mechanisms, the ubiquitin–proteasome system and the autophagy–lysosome pathway (Lee et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2017a). Indeed, proteasome and lysosome inhibitors can delay Tau turnover and promote Tau‐driven neuropathology (Zhang et al, 2005; Hamano et al, 2008). However, dysfunction of a third degradative pathway, the endolysosomal system, is also linked to AD and other neurodegenerative conditions that exhibit Tau accumulation, including Parkinson's disease (Rivero‐Rios et al, 2015; Kett & Dauer, 2016; Small et al, 2017). Nevertheless, the role of the endolysosomal pathway in the clearance of Tau is almost completely unexplored.

Here, we report that the small GTPase Rab35 and the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery mediate the delivery of Tau to lysosomes via early endosomes and multivesicular bodies (MVBs). We further demonstrate that this pathway is negatively regulated by GC, which suppress Rab35 transcription, thereby inhibiting Tau degradation and promoting its accumulation. Finally, we show that in vitro and in vivo overexpression of Rab35 can rescue GC‐induced Tau accumulation and neurostructural deficits in hippocampal neurons. These findings demonstrate Rab35's critical role as a regulator of Tau clearance under physiological and pathological conditions.

Results

The ESCRT pathway is necessary and sufficient for Tau degradation

Despite its primarily axonal and microtubule‐related distribution, Tau is also found in the somatodendritic compartment and associated with lipid membranes (Pooler & Hanger, 2010; Georgieva et al, 2014). To determine whether Tau undergoes endosomal sorting, we looked for Tau immunoreactivity in multivesicular bodies (MVBs), late endosomal structures that deliver cargo to lysosomes. Immuno‐electron microscopy in rat hippocampal tissue revealed MVBs that contain Tau immunogold labeling (Figs 1A and EV1A), indicating that Tau is sorted into MVBs and can potentially undergo degradation via the endocytic pathway. MVB biogenesis is catalyzed by the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) system, a series of protein complexes that recruit ubiquitylated cargo destined for degradation and facilitate the formation of intraluminal vesicles (Raiborg & Stenmark, 2009). The initial component of the ESCRT‐0 complex, Hrs, is essential for binding and recruitment of ubiquitylated cargo into MVBs (Raiborg & Stenmark, 2009; Frankel & Audhya, 2017). To examine whether Hrs interacts with Tau, we performed the proximity ligation assay (PLA; see Fig 1B) in N2a cells overexpressing mCh‐tagged Hrs (Figs 1C and EV1B). Here, we detected fluorescent puncta, representing close (20–50 nm) proximity of Hrs and Tau, that were associated with Hrs‐positive early endosomes (Fig 1C) and increased upon overexpression of GFP‐tagged wild‐type Tau (GFP‐wtTau; 0N4R isoform; Hoover et al, 2010; Fig EV1C and D), demonstrating specificity of the PLA signal for the Hrs/Tau interaction. This interaction was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation (IP) experiments in N2a cells overexpressing FLAG‐Hrs and either GFP or GFP‐wtTau, wherein Hrs was specifically pulled down by GFP‐wtTau (Fig EV1E). Treatment with a deubiquitylating enzyme (DUB) inhibitor to increase ubiquitylated Tau species further increased the Hrs/Tau interaction as measured by both co‐IP and PLA (Fig EV1F–I), indicating that ubiquitylation promotes Tau's association with Hrs and subsequent entry into the ESCRT pathway. Using super‐resolution fluorescence microscopy, we also identified Tau in both membranes and lumen of Hrs‐, EEA1‐, and Rab5‐positive early endosomes in N2a cells (Fig 1D and E). These findings demonstrate the presence of Tau in endosomal compartments at both early and late stages of the endolysosomal pathway.

Figure 1. Tau protein localizes to early endosomes and MVBs.

Figure 1

  1. Electron micrographs of immunogold‐labeled Tau (arrows) in multivesicular bodies (yellow dashed lines) of rat hippocampus (scale bar: 250 nm).
  2. Schematic diagram of proximity ligation assay (PLA), wherein primary antibodies against Hrs or Tau are detected by secondary antibodies conjugated to DNA. Ligation and amplification of DNA, resulting in green signal, only occurs when proteins are in close (20–50 nm) proximity.
  3. PLA signal (green) for Hrs/Tau interaction (arrows) on an mCh‐Hrs‐labeled endosome (red) in N2a cells; scale bar: 5 μm (see also Fig EV1).
  4. Super‐resolution images of N2a cells transfected with constitutively active Rab5 (EGFP‐Rab5‐CA) and immunostained for Tau, revealing the presence of Tau in both membranes and lumen of early endosomes (scale bar: 5 μm).
  5. Super‐resolution images of N2a cells transfected with mCh‐Hrs and immunostained for Tau and EEA1. Higher‐magnification insets (A and B) show Hrs‐ and EEA1‐positive endosomes with juxtaposed Tau puncta present both in the membrane and lumen; scale bar: 5 μm.

Figure EV1. EM and PLA controls, and the impact of ubiquitylation on Hrs/Tau interaction.

Figure EV1

  • A
    EM negative controls for Tau immunogold labeling.
  • B
    As a technical control for specificity of the proximity ligation assay (PLA) to detect mCh‐Hrs/Tau interaction, mCh‐Hrs was expressed in N2a cells, but only primary antibody against Tau was used, preventing the PLA signal.
  • C, D
    For validation of PLA to detect FLAG‐Hrs/Tau interaction (arrows), FLAG‐Hrs was expressed in N2a cells alone (left), or together with EGFP‐Tau (middle). Higher Tau levels lead to significantly increased PLA signal, indicating specificity of the interaction (scale bar: 5 μm) (n = 23–28 cells per experiment; ****P < 0.0001; Mann‐Whitney test). Moreover, FLAG‐peptide incubation with anti‐FLAG antibody prior to the PLA protocol completely abolished PLA signal (right), thus serving as a negative control.
  • E
    Immunoblots of N2a cell lysates expressing FLAG‐Hrs and either EGFP‐Tau or soluble EGFP, immunoprecipitated with GFP antibodies and probed with FLAG or Tau antibodies. Note that Hrs is pulled down with EGFP‐Tau, but not with EGFP alone, demonstrating a specific interaction between Tau and Hrs.
  • F, G
    Immunoblots of N2a cell lysates expressing FLAG‐Hrs and either EGFP‐Tau or soluble EGFP, ±the deubiquitylating enzyme (DUB) inhibitor PR619, immunoprecipitated with GFP antibodies and probed with FLAG or Tau antibodies. Note that Hrs is pulled down with EGFP‐Tau but not EGFP alone, and that this pull down is enhanced in the presence of PR619, demonstrating specificity of the Hrs/Tau and its dependence on ubiquitylation (n = 3/condition; ***P = 0.0008; unpaired Student's t‐test).
  • H, I
    Incubation of N2a cells with DUB inhibitor PR619 also significantly increases the number of PLA puncta, demonstrating the dependence of Hrs/Tau interaction on ubiquitylation (n = 113–121/condition; **P = 0.0014; Mann‐Whitney test).

Source data are available online for this figure.

Rab35 promotes Tau degradation through the ESCRT pathway

To assess the role of the ESCRT pathway in Tau clearance (Fig 2A), we measured Tau degradation in primary hippocampal neurons lentivirally transduced with an shRNA against TSG101, an essential component of the ESCRT‐I complex. Depletion of TSG101 is a common mechanism for blocking degradation of ESCRT pathway cargo (Edgar et al, 2015; Maminska et al, 2016), and our shTSG101 hairpin reliably reduces TSG101 levels by ~60% (Fig EV2A and B). Using a previously described cycloheximide (CHX)‐chase assay to measure the fold change in Tau degradation (Sheehan et al, 2016), we found that shTSG101 decreased this value by 30% (Fig 2B and C), indicating its ability to inhibit Tau degradation. Conversely, activation of the ESCRT pathway by TSG101 overexpression increased Tau degradation by ~30% (Fig 2D and E). Together, these findings indicate that the ESCRT pathway is both necessary and sufficient for mediating Tau degradation.

Figure 2. Tau degradation occurs through the Rab35/ESCRT pathway.

Figure 2

  • A
    Schematic diagram of the Rab35/ESCRT pathway, indicating the manipulation of targets (Rab35 and TSG101) used in our studies, and the final readout of Tau degradation; green and red arrows represent overexpression and knockdown of the target proteins, respectively.
  • B, C
    Representative immunoblots (B) and quantification of Tau degradation (C) from 14 DIV primary neurons transduced with EGFP or shTSG101, treated for 24 h with either DMSO (CON) or cycloheximide (CHX), and probed for Tau and tubulin. shTSG101‐expressing neurons exhibit markedly decreased Tau degradation compared to EGFP‐expressing controls (n = 18–19 per condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, *P = 0.0108).
  • D, E
    Representative immunoblots (D) and quantification of Tau degradation (E) from 14 DIV neurons transduced with mCh or mCh‐TSG101, treated for 24 h with either DMSO (CON) or cycloheximide (CHX), and probed for Tau and tubulin. Overexpression of TSG101 increases Tau degradation (n = 17/condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, *P = 0.0115).
  • F, G
    Representative immunoblots (F) and quantification of Tau degradation (G) from 14 DIV neurons transduced with mCh or shRab35, treated for 24 h with either DMSO (CON) or cycloheximide (CHX), and probed for Tau and tubulin. shRab35‐expressing neurons exhibit markedly decreased Tau degradation compared to mCh‐expressing controls (n = 23–26 per condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, ***P = 0.0008).
  • H, I
    Representative immunoblots (H) and quantification of Tau degradation (I) from 14 DIV neurons transduced with mCh or mCh‐Rab35, treated for 24 h with either DMSO (CON) or cycloheximide (CHX), and probed for Tau or tubulin. Rab35 overexpression increases Tau degradation (n = 18 per condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, *P = 0.0126).
  • J
    Flow cytometry distribution of N2a cells co‐transfected with either HA vector (black) or HA‐Rab35 (green) and medium fluorescence timer‐tagged wild‐type Tau (FT‐Tau); blue fluorescence (y axis) indicates “younger” Tau protein, while red fluorescence (x axis) indicates “older” Tau.
  • K
    The ratio of cells expressing red to blue (older:younger) FT‐Tau is reduced in cells overexpressing Rab35, indicating faster Tau turnover (n = 9/condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, ****P < 0.0001).
  • L
    The ratio of cells expressing red to blue (older:younger) FT‐tagged phospho‐mimetic E14 Tau (FT‐TauE14) is also reduced in cells overexpressing Rab35, indicating that Rab35 also triggers degradation of phosphorylated Tau (n = 10/condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, *P = 0.0032).
Data information: All numeric data represent mean ± SEM.Source data are available online for this figure.

Figure EV2. ESCRT‐I component TSG101 mediates degradation of pSer396/404‐ and pSer262‐Tau.

Figure EV2

  • A, B
    Representative immunoblots (A) and quantification of TSG101 levels (B) from 14 DIV primary neurons transduced with EGFP or shTSG101, treated for 24 h with either DMSO (CON) or cycloheximide (CHX), and probed for TSG101 and tubulin. (B) shTSG101 significantly decreases TSG101 protein levels (n = 12–14/condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, ****P < 0.0001).
  • C, D
    Representative immunoblots (C) and quantification of Rab35 levels (D) from 14 DIV primary neurons transduced with mCherry or shRab35, treated for 24 h with either DMSO (CON) or cycloheximide (CHX), and probed for Rab35 and tubulin. (D) shRab35 significantly decreases Rab35 protein levels (n = 4/condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, ***P = 0.0004).
  • E
    Ratio of red:blue N2a cells co‐expressing medium FT together with HA vector or HA‐Rab35 and analyzed by flow cytometry, showing no effect of Rab35 on the turnover of FT tag alone. These data indicate that Rab35 specifically stimulates the degradation of Tau (n = 6/condition).
  • F, G
    Representative immunoblots (F) and quantification of Tau degradation (G) from 14 DIV primary neurons transduced with EGFP or shTSG101, treated for 24 h with either DMSO (CON) or cycloheximide (CHX), and probed for pSer396/404‐Tau (PHF1), pSer262‐Tau, or pSer202‐Tau (CP13) and tubulin. shTSG101‐expressing neurons exhibit markedly decreased pSer262‐Tau and pSer396/404‐Tau degradation compared to EGFP‐expressing controls, while pSer202‐Tau degradation is unaffected (n = 8/condition for pSer396/404‐Tau, n = 5/condition for pSer262‐Tau and pSer202‐Tau, *ppSer396/404‐Tau = 0.0462, ppSer262‐Tau = 0.0199).
Data information: All numeric data represent mean ± SEM.Source data are available online for this figure.

In recent work, we demonstrated that ESCRT‐0 protein Hrs is an effector of the small GTPase Rab35 and is recruited by active Rab35 to catalyze downstream ESCRT recruitment and MVB formation (Sheehan et al, 2016). Therefore, we investigated whether Rab35 is also a key regulator of Tau degradation. Again using the CHX‐chase assay, we measured Tau degradation in neurons transduced with a previously characterized shRNA to knockdown Rab35 (shRab35; Fig EV2C and D; Sheehan et al, 2016). We found that shRab35 decreased Tau degradation by ~30% (Fig 2F and G), indicative of Rab35's role in this process. Moreover, overexpression/gain‐of‐function of mCherry‐tagged Rab35 increased Tau degradation by nearly 50% compared to mCh control (Fig 2H and I), demonstrating that Rab35 is a potent regulator of Tau turnover.

We further confirmed the effect of Rab35 on Tau with a flow cytometry assay using N2a cells transfected with HA‐Rab35 and medium fluorescent timer (FT)‐tagged wtTau (FT‐Tau). The emission of medium FT changes from blue to red as it matures, with half‐maximal red fluorescence at 3.9 h (Fig 2J; Subach et al, 2009), and this fluorophore has previously been used to monitor protein degradation based on the intensities of red (“older”) vs. blue (“younger”) fluorescent protein in cells (Fernandes et al, 2014). We found that the ratio of red:blue (old:new) FT‐Tau was significantly lower in N2a cells co‐expressing HA‐Rab35 compared to HA vector control (Fig 2K), indicating faster Tau degradation. Rab35 overexpression did not alter the red:blue ratio when FT alone was expressed in N2a cells (Fig EV2E), confirming that Rab35 specifically stimulates Tau degradation. Given that Tau hyperphosphorylation is a key pathogenic event in AD and other tauopathies (Guo et al, 2017), we also evaluated whether Rab35 could stimulate the degradation of hyperphosphorylated Tau, using the phospho‐mimetic E14 Tau mutant, in which 14 serine and threonine residues are replaced with glutamic acid (Hoover et al, 2010). The ratio of red:blue FT‐TauE14 was again significantly lower in HA‐Rab35‐expressing N2a cells (Fig 2L), indicating Rab35's ability to mediate the degradation of phosphorylated Tau.

Since Tau is phosphorylated at multiple sites, we used antibodies against several phospho‐Tau epitopes related to pathogenic Tau activity, including Ser396/404, Ser262, and Ser202, to determine which Tau species were sensitive to Rab35/ESCRT‐mediated degradation. Interestingly, we found that degradation of both pSer396/404‐Tau and pSer262‐Tau (measured by CHX‐chase assay) was significantly slowed by knockdown of Rab35, while pSer202‐Tau was unaffected (Fig 3A and B). We saw similar results with knockdown of TSG101 (Fig EV2F and G). To further verify that Rab35 stimulates Tau degradation through the ESCRT pathway, we assessed the effect of Rab35 on Hrs/Tau interaction by PLA. Here, N2a cells were co‐transfected with FLAG‐Hrs and mCherry or mCh‐Rab35, and PLA performed with antibodies against FLAG and either total or phospho‐Tau epitopes. For total Tau, as well as pSer396/404‐Tau and pSer262‐Tau, Rab35 expression significantly increased the number of fluorescent puncta per cell (Fig 3C and D), representing increased interaction of these Tau species with Hrs and thus their subsequent sorting into the ESCRT pathway. In contrast, Rab35 had no effect on PLA puncta number for pSer202‐Tau (Fig 3C and D). Consistent with our CHX‐chase assay findings, these PLA data suggest that Rab35 promotes the degradation of Tau protein through the ESCRT pathway, with some preference for Tau phosphorylated at pSer262 and pSer396/404, but not pSer202.

Figure 3. Phospho‐dependent selectivity of Tau sorting into the Rab35/ESCRT pathway.

Figure 3

  • A, B
    Representative immunoblots (A) and quantification of Tau degradation (B) from 14 DIV primary neurons transduced with mCh or shRab35, treated for 24 h with either DMSO (CON) or cycloheximide (CHX), and probed for pSer396/404‐Tau (PHF1), pSer262‐Tau, or pSer202‐Tau (CP13) and tubulin. shRab35‐expressing neurons exhibit markedly decreased pSer262‐ and p396/404‐Tau degradation compared to mCh‐expressing controls, while pSer202‐Tau degradation is unaffected (n = 4 per condition for pSer396/404‐Tau and pSer202‐Tau, n = 3 for pSer262‐Tau, unpaired Student's t‐test, **P = 0.0027, *P = 0.0120).
  • C
    Images of PLA signal (green) for Hrs/Tau interaction in N2a cells co‐transfected with FLAG‐Hrs and either mCh or mCh‐Rab35 (red), and probed with antibodies against FLAG and total (DA9) or phospho‐Tau species (pSer396/404‐Tau, pSer262‐Tau, or pSer202‐Tau); scale bar: 5 μm.
  • D
    Rab35 overexpression significantly increases PLA puncta for total, pSer396/404‐Tau, pSer262‐Tau but not pSer202‐Tau (n = 121–132 cells for total Tau, 178–195 cells for pSer396/404‐Tau, 71–98 cells for pSer262‐Tau, 25–29 cells for pSer202‐Tau; Mann–Whitney U‐test, ****P < 0.0001).
Data information: All numeric data represent mean ± SEM.Source data are available online for this figure.

To verify that the Rab35/ESCRT pathway mediates Tau degradation through lysosomes, we next treated hippocampal neurons with bafilomycin (to block acidification and trap lysosome contents) in the presence of mCh‐tagged TSG101 or Rab35 to stimulate Tau sorting into this pathway (Fig 4A). We found that bafilomycin led to a significant accumulation of Tau in lysosomes of neurons expressing either TSG101 or Rab35 vs. mCh control, assessed by the fraction of Tau colocalization with LAMP1 (Fig 4A and B). Furthermore, through sucrose‐based fractionation of primary neurons, we found that Rab35 overexpression increased the fraction of Tau in endosomal/lysosomal (Rab35‐ and LAMP1‐enriched) fractions (Fig EV3), providing further support for the stimulating role of Rab35 on Tau sorting into the endolysosomal pathway. We also evaluated the effects of Rab35 gain‐of‐function on Tau stability in different neuronal compartments, using CHX treatment combined with immunofluorescence microscopy in hippocampal neurons expressing mCh or mCh‐Rab35, as previously described (Sheehan et al, 2016). Although both Rab35 and Tau are enriched in axons, Rab35 overexpression reduced Tau fluorescence in both axons and neuronal somata by between 25 and 50%, demonstrating the ability of Rab35 to stimulate Tau degradation in distinct neuronal compartments (Fig 4C and D).

Figure 4. Rab35/ESCRT pathway promotes Tau degradation via lysosomes.

Figure 4

  • A, B
    Representative images and quantification of 14 DIV neurons transduced with mCh, mCh‐TSG101, or mCh‐Rab35, treated for 5 h with either DMSO (CON) or bafilomycin (Baf) to block lysosomal degradation, and immunostained for Tau and LAMP1. Overexpression of Rab35 or TSG101 increases Tau accumulation in lysosomes of Baf‐treated neurons, indicating that Rab35/ESCRT pathway activation stimulates sorting of Tau into lysosomes (scale bar: 5 μm) (n = 25–27 cells/condition; for TSG101, two‐way ANOVA, Baf × TSG101 interaction F 1,99 = 4,075 P = 0.04, overall Baf effect F 1,99 = 10.30 P = 0.0018, Sidak post hoc analysis ***P = 0.0007; for Rab35, two‐way ANOVA, Baf × Ra35 interaction F 1,101 = 5.36 P = 0.02, overall Baf effect F 1,101 = 12.01 P = 0.0008, Sidak post hoc analysis ***P = 0.0001). All numeric data represent mean ± SEM.
  • C
    Images of 14 DIV neurons transduced with mCh or mCh‐Rab35, treated for 24 h with either DMSO (CON) or cycloheximide (CHX) and immunostained for Tau; scale bar: 10 μm.
  • D
    Tau fluorescence intensity is markedly reduced in both soma and axons of CHX‐treated neurons overexpressing Rab35 compared to mCh, indicating faster Tau degradation (n = 24/condition; for axons, n = 25–26/condition); for soma, two‐way ANOVA, overall CHX effect F 1,92 = 19.27 P < 0.0001, Sidak post hoc analysis ***P = 0.002; for axon, two‐way ANOVA, CHX × Rab35 interaction F 1,97 = 13.27 P = 0.0004, overall CHX effect F 1,97 = 14.34, P = 0.0003, Sidak post hoc analysis ****P < 0.0001).

Figure EV3. Rab35 overexpression increases Tau accumulation in neuronal endolysosomal fractions.

Figure EV3

  • A
    Immunoblots of Tau and tubulin in sucrose‐gradient‐based subcellular fractions of 14 DIV neurons transduced with mCh or mCh‐Rab35.
  • B, C
    Quantification of the enrichment per fraction (%) of Tau and tubulin. Rab35‐expressing neurons exhibit an increased relative distribution of Tau in fractions 3–6 (endosome/lysosome‐enriched fractions) compared to mCh‐expressing neurons, while tubulin distribution remained unchanged (*P = 0.0135; unpaired Student's t‐test; n = 1). LAMP1 was used as a marker of endosome/lysosome fractions.
Data information: All numeric data represent mean ± SEM.Source data are available online for this figure.

Glucocorticoids decrease Rab35 levels in vitro and in vivo

Clinical studies suggest that stressful life events and high GC levels are risk factors for AD (Johansson et al, 2010; Machado et al, 2014); and animal studies demonstrate that prolonged exposure to environmental stress and/or elevated GC levels trigger Tau accumulation (Lopes et al, 2016b,c; Vyas et al, 2016). Based on our findings identifying the Rab35/ESCRT pathway as a critical regulator of Tau degradation, we next examined whether GC treatment altered the levels of Rab35 or ESCRT pathway proteins. Primary neurons were treated with GC and the levels of ESCRT proteins (Hrs, TSG101, CHMP2b) and Rab35 measured. Interestingly, we found that GC treatment selectively reduced Rab35 protein levels without altering the levels of other ESCRT proteins (Fig 5A and B). GC are known to regulate gene transcription via activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which binds glucocorticoid response elements (GRE) within the promoter regions of genes (Vyas et al, 2016). We therefore used qPCR to measure Rab35 mRNA levels in hippocampal neurons and N2a cells, and found that GC treatment led to a significant reduction in Rab35 mRNA in both cell types (Fig 5C). Consistent with the concept that GC regulate Rab35 transcription, we found that the Rab35 gene contains 14 non‐redundant GREs (Table 1). We subsequently measured the levels of Rab35 and other endocytic Rab GTPases in the hippocampi of rats that received GC injections for 15 days (Fig 5D). The hippocampus displays overt lesions in both stress‐ and Tau‐related pathologies and is one of the earliest brain regions to show signs of neurodegeneration (Vyas et al, 2016). In line with our in vitro findings, Rab35 levels were significantly decreased in GC‐injected animals, whereas none of the other Rab GTPases analyzed had significantly altered levels as assessed by immunoblot analysis (Fig 5E and F). We observed a similar ~25% decrease in immunofluorescence staining of Rab35 in the dorsal CA1 area of hippocampus in GC‐treated vs. control animals (Figs 5G and H, and EV4A). Altogether, these in vitro and in vivo results suggest that GC specifically decrease Rab35 transcription, leading to reduced Rab35 mRNA and protein levels in hippocampal neurons.

Figure 5. Glucocorticoids decrease Rab35 levels in vitro and in vivo .

Figure 5

  • A, B
    Representative immunoblots (A) and quantification of Hrs, TSG101, CHMP2b, and Rab35 protein levels (B) from 14 DIV neurons treated with either DMSO (CON) or glucocorticoids (GC). GC treatment selectively decreases Rab35 protein levels without affecting levels of Hrs, TSG101, or CHMP2b (n = 9–10/condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, *P = 0.0221).
  • C
    Rab35 mRNA levels are decreased by GC in 14 DIV hippocampal neurons and N2a cells (for neurons, n = 9/condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, **P = 0.0036; for N2a cells, n = 6/condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, *P = 0.0138).
  • D
    Schematic diagram of GC and vehicle control (CON) treatment in rats for 15 days.
  • E, F
    Representative immunoblots (E) and quantification of levels of different Rab proteins (F) in hippocampus of GC‐treated and CON animals. Protein levels of Rab35, but not other Rabs, are decreased in GC‐treated animals compared to CON ones (n = 5 animals/condition, unpaired Student's t‐test, *P = 0.0257).
  • G, H
    Immunofluorescence staining of Rab35 (green) and DAPI (blue) (G) showing that Rab35 fluorescence intensity is reduced in hippocampal area (CA1) of GC‐treated animals (H) (n = 15 slices/condition; unpaired Student's t‐test, ***P = 0.0003).
Data information: All numeric data represent mean ± SEM.Source data are available online for this figure.

Table 1.

Chromosomal position of GR binding sites for Rab35 gene

Position Chromosome Start End
1 chr5 115630873 115630972
2 chr5 115631594 115631675
3 chr5 115631971 115632003
4 chr5 115632442 115632541
5 chr5 115632583 115632682
6 chr5 115633507 115633606
7 chr5 115633735 115633834
8 chr5 115635642 115635723
9 chr5 115635734 115635827
10 chr5 115637535 115637616
11 chr5 115640541 115640640
12 chr5 115645909 115646008
13 chr5 115646118 115646217
14 chr5 115647366 115647465

Our analysis identified 14 distinct glucocorticoid response elements associated with the Rab35 gene, indicating the relevance of glucocorticoids for regulating Rab35 transcription.

Figure EV4. Rab35 overexpression prevents GC‐induced accumulation of total and ubiquitylated Tau.

Figure EV4

  • A
    Rat hippocampal sections incubated with secondary antibody only (negative control) or Rab35 primary antibody, showing specificity for Rab35 immunofluorescence.
  • B, C
    Representative immunoblots and quantification of Tau levels from N2a cells transfected with HA vector or HA‐Rab35, treated with vehicle control (CON) or GC, and probed for Tau and tubulin. GC induces significant Tau accumulation in cells expressing the HA vector control, and this effect is completely blocked by Rab35 overexpression (n = 9/condition; 2‐way ANOVA, GC × Rab35 interaction F 1, 32 = 14.40 P = 0.0006, overall GC effect F 1, 32 = 4.537 P = 0.04, overall Rab35 effect F 1, 32 = 18.47 P = 0.002, Sidak post hoc analysis ***P = 0.0004).
  • D
    Representative blots of cell lysates (input; left) or anti‐GFP immunoprecipitates (IP; right) from N2a cells transfected with HA‐Ubiquitin, EGFP‐Tau, and either mCh or mCh‐Rab35 under control and GC conditions.
  • E
    GC induces significant accumulation of ubiquitylated Tau (IP panel from D), and this effect is attenuated by Rab35 overexpression (n = 4/condition; 2‐way ANOVA overall GC effect F 1, 12 = 10,99 P = 0.0062, overall Rab35 effect F 1, 12 = 5,673 P = 0.0346, Sidak post hoc analysis *P = 0.0161).
  • F
    Similarly, GC induces the accumulation of total ubiquitylated proteins (input panel from D), and this effect is attenuated by Rab35 expression (n = 4/condition; 2‐way ANOVA, GC × Rab35 interaction F 1,12 = 4.904 P = 0.0469, overall GC effect F 1, 12 = 67.25 P < 0.0001, overall Rab35 effect F 1, 12 = 10.27 P = 0.0076, Sidak post hoc analysis **P = 0.0023, ****P < 0.0001).
Data information: All numeric data represent mean ± SEM.Source data are available online for this figure.

Rab35 gain‐of‐function rescues GC‐induced Tau accumulation and neurostructural deficits

Based on our findings that Rab35 mediates Tau turnover, and that exposure to high GC levels downregulates Rab35, we hypothesized that Rab35 overexpression could attenuate GC‐induced Tau accumulation and related neuronal atrophy (Green et al, 2006; Sotiropoulos et al, 2011; Pinheiro et al, 2015). To test this hypothesis, we performed the CHX‐chase assay in hippocampal neurons transduced with either mCh or mCh‐Rab35, and treated with GC or vehicle control. As shown in Fig 6, GC treatment reduced Tau degradation in mCherry‐expressing neurons, but this effect was completely blocked by Rab35 overexpression (Fig 6A and B). Similar results were seen in N2a cells, where Rab35 overexpression prevented the GC‐driven increase in total Tau levels (Fig EV4B and C) and in ubiquitylated Tau species (Fig EV4D–F). Since ubiquitylation is the major signal for cargo sorting into the ESCRT pathway, these findings provide further evidence that Rab35 stimulates the endolysosomal sorting of ubiquitylated Tau.

Figure 6. AAV‐mediated Rab35 expression rescues glucocorticoid‐induced Tau accumulation and associated neuronal atrophy in rat hippocampus.

Figure 6

  • A, B
    Representative immunoblots (A) and quantification of Tau degradation (B) in 14 DIV neurons expressing mCh‐Rab35 or mCh, treated for 24 h with cycloheximide (CHX) or DMSO (CON) under GC conditions. GC significantly decreases Tau degradation, whereas Rab35 overexpression blocks this effect (n = 12–14/condition; one‐way ANOVA, Dunnet post hoc analysis, *P mCh vs. mCh GC = 0.0319, *P mCh vs. Rab35 GC = 0.047).
  • C
    Injection of AAV to express EGFP or EGFP‐Rab35, driven by the CaMKIIα promoter, in rat hippocampus prior to GC or vehicle (CON) treatment.
  • D, E
    Representative immunoblots (D) and quantification of Tau levels (E) in hippocampal synaptosomes reveal that GC increases total Tau levels in animals expressing EGFP, but not Rab35 (n = 5–6 animals/group, two replicates, two‐way ANOVA, GC × Rab35 interaction F 1,39 = 10.51 P = 0.002; Sidak post hoc analysis *P = 0.0168).
  • F
    Golgi‐based 3D neuronal reconstruction of hippocampal pyramidal neurons (CA1 area).
  • G
    GC treatment reduces the length of apical dendrites in animals expressing EGFP, but not EGFP‐Rab35 (n = 6–7 animals/group; 6–8 neurons/animal, 2‐way ANOVA, GC × Rab35 interaction F 1,155 = 3.969 P = 0.0481, overall GC effect F 1,155 = 8.998 P = 0.0031, Sidak post hoc analysis **P = 0.0021).
  • H
    GC treatment reduces mature spine density in animals expressing EGFP, but not EGFP‐Rab35 (two‐way ANOVA, GC × Rab35 interaction F 1,499 = 12.33 P = 0.0005, overall GC effect F 1,499 = 4.373 P = 0.0370, Sidak post hoc analysis ***P = 0.0003; n = 6–7 animals/group; 6–8 neurons per animal).
  • I, J
    Sholl analysis of apical dendrites in rat hippocampus shows reduced dendritic intersections after GC treatment in EGFP‐expressing animals; however, this effect is not seen in EGFP‐Rab35‐expressing animals (three‐way ANOVA, GC × Rab35 interaction F 1,4,212 = 14,926 P < 0.0001, simple effect analysis, Sidak test for multiple comparisons *P 120 = 0.012, **P 140 = 0.001, **P 220 = 0.002, ***P 240 < 0.001, ***P 260 < 0.001, **P 280 = 0.001, **P 300 = 0.001, *P 320 = 0.021, *P 340 = 0.047, n = 6–7 animals/group, 6–8 neurons per animal).
Data information: All numeric data represent mean ± SEM.Source data are available online for this figure.

Previous studies showed that exposure to stress or high GC levels induced Tau accumulation, dendritic atrophy, and synapse loss in animals (Pinheiro et al, 2015; Lopes et al, 2016b), and that these hippocampal deficits were Tau‐dependent (Lopes et al, 2016a,b). To test whether Rab35 could protect against these GC‐induced effects, we injected middle‐aged rats with adeno‐associated virus (AAV) to express EGFP or EGFP‐Rab35 in excitatory neurons of the hippocampus under control of the CaMKIIα promoter (Fig 6C). Animals were subsequently treated with GC or vehicle control. Both EGFP‐ and EGFP‐Rab35‐injected animals displayed similar body mass loss following GC administration, demonstrating a similar response to high GC levels in the presence or absence of overexpressed Rab35 (Fig EV5A–C). However, in contrast to EGFP animals that exhibited significant GC‐induced Tau accumulation in hippocampal synaptosomes, animals expressing EGFP‐Rab35 did not show any such accumulation (Fig 6D and E). Furthermore, using Golgi‐based 3D neuronal reconstruction of CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampus, we found that GC significantly decreased the length of apical dendrites in the EGFP control group, but not in animals expressing EGFP‐Rab35 (Fig 6F and G). Notably, EGFP‐Rab35 expression alone did not alter apical dendritic length (Fig 6G), and no difference in basal dendrite length was found between the groups (Fig EV5D), consistent with previous work showing selective vulnerability of apical dendrites to GC (Lopes et al, 2016b). We also found that GC treatment led to a significant loss of mature spines and concomitant increase in immature spines in EGFP‐expressing animals, but no change in mature or immature spine density in EGFP‐Rab35 animals (Figs 6H and EV5E). GC‐induced neuronal atrophy was further confirmed by Sholl analysis, which measures the number of dendritic intersections as a function of their distance from the soma. As shown in Fig 6I and J, GC reduced the number of distal dendritic intersections in neurons expressing EGFP but not EGFP‐Rab35. Altogether, these in vivo findings indicate that Rab35 overexpression prevents GC‐driven neurostructural deficits, implicating Rab35 as an essential regulator of GC‐induced neuronal dysfunction.

Figure EV5. Rab35 overexpression in vivo blocks GC‐driven neurostructural changes.

Figure EV5

  • A
    Body weight of rats injected with either EGFP or EGFP‐Rab35 and treated for 2 weeks with GC or vehicle control (CON). GC‐treated groups exhibited reduced body weight, demonstrating the similar systemic effect of GC treatment on both EGFP‐ and Rab35‐expressing animals (n = 6–8 animals; 2‐way ANOVA, overall GC effect F 1, 25 = 35,63 P < 0.0001, Sidak post hoc analysis **P = 0,0031, ****P < 0.0001).
  • B, C
    Blots and quantification of AAV‐EGFP‐Rab35 overexpression levels in the animals' brains, showing a 4:1 ratio of Rab35 levels in EGFP‐Rab35‐injected animals (expressing both exogenous and endogenous Rab35) vs. EGFP‐injected animals (expressing only endogenous Rab35).
  • D
    The average lengths of basal dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons are not altered following GC treatment in either EGFP‐ or Rab35‐expressing animals.
  • E
    Immature spine density increases following GC treatment in EGFP‐ but not Rab35‐expressing animals (n = 6–7 animals/group; 6–8 neurons per animal, 2‐way ANOVA, GC × Rab35 interaction F 1, 499 = 4.013 P = 0.045, overall GC effect F 1, 499 = 5.142 P = 0.0238, Sidak post hoc analysis **P = 0.0072).
Data information: All numeric data represent mean ± SEM.Source data are available online for this figure.

Discussion

Impairment of Tau proteostasis is linked to neuronal and synaptic dysfunction in AD animal models and patients (Roberson et al, 2007; Ittner et al, 2010; Guo et al, 2017). Given that Tau accumulation appears to drive neurodegenerative processes in AD and other neurological diseases (see also Introduction), there is growing interest in understanding the mechanisms that mediate Tau clearance, and their selectivity for different forms of Tau. Previous studies have shown that Tau degradation can occur through the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS), but that macroautophagy plays an important role in the catabolism of aggregated/insoluble Tau, which is not accessible to the UPS (for review, see Chesser et al, 2013). Recent work indicates that chaperone‐mediated autophagy and endosomal microautophagy also contribute differentially to the degradation of wild‐type vs. pathogenic mutants forms of Tau (Caballero et al, 2017), suggesting that Tau turnover is a complex process regulated by multiple factors and involving distinct degradative pathways.

The current study utilizes in vitro and in vivo approaches to demonstrate a critical role for the endocytic pathway, and in particular Rab35 and the ESCRT machinery, in the turnover of total Tau and specific phospho‐Tau species (see Fig 7). The ESCRT system mediates the degradation of membrane‐associated proteins such as epidermal growth factor receptor (Raiborg & Stenmark, 2009), but it has also been implicated in the degradation of cytosolic proteins GAPDH and aldolase (Sahu et al, 2011). These findings are of particular relevance for Tau, which has both cytosolic and membrane‐associated pools (Pooler & Hanger, 2010; Georgieva et al, 2014), and has been shown to localize to different neuronal subcompartments based on its phosphorylation state (Hoover et al, 2010; Pinheiro et al, 2015). The current study reveals that Tau appears in Hrs‐, EEA1‐, and Rab5‐positive early endosomes (on the membrane and in the lumen), intraluminal vesicles of MVBs, and LAMP1‐positive vesicles and membrane fractions, demonstrating its trafficking through the entire endolysosomal pathway. Moreover, we find that Tau interacts with the initial ESCRT protein Hrs, and that this interaction is strengthened by deubiquitylating enzyme inhibitors, indicating its dependence on Tau ubiquitylation. We also observe that the small GTPase Rab35 is a positive regulator of Tau sorting into the ESCRT pathway. Not only does overexpression of Rab35 stimulate Tau's interaction with Hrs and subsequent lysosomal degradation, but Rab35 knockdown significantly slows Tau degradation. Interestingly, while Rab35 stimulates the turnover of phospho‐mimetic E14 Tau, not all phosphorylated Tau species are equally susceptible to degradation in the Rab35/ESCRT pathway. In particular, we find that pSer396/404 and pSer262, but not pSer202, phospho‐Tau species undergo Rab35‐mediated degradation, indicative of preferential sorting of specific phospho‐Tau proteins into the Rab35/ESCRT pathway. Such differences might reflect changes in ubiquitylation and/or endosomal membrane association of the various phospho‐Tau species. Additional work is needed to clarify the relationship between Tau posttranslational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation and ubiquitylation) and the sorting and clearance of cytosolic vs. membrane‐associated pools of Tau, as well as the impact of stress/GC on these processes.

Figure 7. High glucocorticoid levels suppress Rab/ESCRT‐dependent Tau degradation, leading to Tau accumulation.

Figure 7

Working model of Tau degradation through the Rab35/ESCRT pathway, and its inhibition by glucocorticoids (GC). Rab35 mediates Tau clearance via the endolysosomal pathway by recruiting initial ESCRT component Hrs, which recognizes and sorts ubiquitylated Tau into early endosomes for packaging into MVBs. GC suppress transcription of Rab35, which in turn decreases Tau sorting into MVBs and its subsequent degradation by lysosomes, leading to Tau accumulation and related neuronal atrophy.

We recently showed that Rab35 and ESCRT proteins (e.g., Hrs, CHMP2b) localize to axons and presynaptic boutons, similar to Tau, and that Rab35 stimulates the degradation of synaptic vesicle proteins by mediating the recruitment of Hrs to SV pools in response to neuronal activity (Sheehan et al, 2016). In the current study, we show that Tau interacts with Hrs‐positive early endosomes in a Rab35‐dependent manner, and that Rab35 stimulates the degradation of both axonal and somatodendritic pools of Tau. Although Tau localizes primarily to axons, many studies (including our own) have shown that it also localizes to the somatodendritic compartment and to dendritic spines under both healthy and pathological conditions, suggesting a synaptic function for Tau (Ittner et al, 2010; Mondragon‐Rodriguez et al, 2012; Frandemiche et al, 2014; Pinheiro et al, 2015; Lopes et al, 2016c). Moreover, recent work demonstrates more complex intraneuronal trafficking of Tau than previously appreciated, including activity‐dependent translocation of Tau to excitatory synapses (Frandemiche et al, 2014) and AMPA/NMDA receptor‐dependent Tau hyperphosphorylation and dendritic Tau mRNA translation (Kobayashi et al, 2017). Interestingly, our current findings demonstrate the selective sorting of particular phospho‐Tau species into the Rab35/ESCRT pathway, which together with other studies (Pooler & Hanger, 2010; Mondragon‐Rodriguez et al, 2012; Frandemiche et al, 2014; Pinheiro et al, 2015) provides novel mechanistic insights into how epitope‐specific Tau phosphorylation regulates its trafficking, subcellular localization, and degradation. Our future studies will focus on understanding the role of the Rab35/ESCRT pathway on Tau degradation in different neuronal compartments under pathological conditions, including AD and other tauopathies, wherein Tau is hyperphosphorylated at multiple epitopes (Ittner et al, 2010; Zempel et al, 2010).

Recent evidence suggests that dysfunction of the ESCRT machinery itself is associated with profound cytopathology, as brain‐specific deletion of ESCRT components in mice leads to the accumulation of ubiquitylated proteins, impaired endosomal trafficking, and cell death (Watson et al, 2015; Oshima et al, 2016). Further, a truncating mutation in ESCRT‐III protein CHMP2b causes familial frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and at the cellular level induces endolysosomal pathway dysfunction and the accumulation of ubiquitylated proteins (Clayton et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2017b). Together with our findings, the above studies support the importance of the endolysosomal pathway, and specifically the ESCRT machinery, in clearance of ubiquitylated proteins such as Tau. Indeed, abnormalities of the endolysosomal pathway, including endosomal enlargement and high levels of lysosomal hydrolases, are reported as the earliest intracellular features of AD (Nixon & Yang, 2011). Intriguingly, these same features are present in Niemann‐Pick disease type C (NPC), an inherited lysosomal storage disorder also characterized by Tau pathology (Suzuki et al, 1995). These shared pathological features of AD and NPC indicate a strong connection between endolysosomal dysfunction and Tau accumulation, supporting the importance of this degradative pathway for Tau proteostasis and pathological accumulation.

Multiple cellular pathways are altered by chronic stress, increasing the vulnerability of affected individuals to psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases such as depression and AD (Sotiropoulos et al, 2008b; Ross et al, 2017). For example, prolonged exposure to stress or high levels of GC trigger Tau accumulation and hyperphosphorylation accompanied by synaptic missorting of Tau and neuronal atrophy (Green et al, 2006; Sotiropoulos et al, 2011; Pinheiro et al, 2015; Lopes et al, 2016c). Importantly, Tau is essential for this stress/GC‐driven damage, as Tau ablation was found to be neuroprotective (Lopes et al, 2016c; Pallas‐Bazarra et al, 2016; Dioli et al, 2017). While previous in vitro studies showed that GC reduce Tau turnover (Sotiropoulos et al, 2008a), the underlying molecular mechanisms were unclear. The current study demonstrates that GC impair Tau degradation by downregulating Rab35, thereby suppressing Tau sorting into the ESCRT pathway and leading to the accumulation of ubiquitylated Tau (Fig 7). These results support the concept that ubiquitylation, the major signal for cargo sorting into the ESCRT pathway, represents the first line of cellular defense against Tau accumulation and related neuronal malfunction (Chesser et al, 2013; Kontaxi et al, 2017). Importantly, we find that Rab35 overexpression blocks Tau accumulation and neuronal atrophy induced by high GC levels. Future studies will clarify the potential interplay between endolysosomal machinery and other degradative pathways such as autophagy under stressful/high GC conditions. Our current findings identify the Rab35/ESCRT pathway as a critical regulator of Tau proteostasis, supporting its involvement in the intraneuronal events through which the primary stress hormones, GC, impair neuronal morphology, and plasticity in the hippocampus (Sousa & Almeida, 2012). Based on the emerging significance of endosomal trafficking defects in AD brain pathology (Small et al, 2017), Rab35 and the endolysosomal pathway deserve further investigation for their therapeutic relevance against Tau‐dependent neuronal malfunction and pathology.

Materials and Methods

Primary neurons and cell lines

Primary neuronal cultures were prepared from E18 Sprague Dawley rat embryos and maintained for 14 DIV before use, as described previously (Sheehan et al, 2016). Neuro2a (N2a) neuroblastoma cells (ATCC CCL‐131) and HEK293T cells (Sigma) were grown in DMEM‐GlutaMAX (Invitrogen) with 10% FBS (Atlanta Biological) and Anti‐Anti (ThermoFisher) and kept at 37°C in 5% CO2. During dexamethasone treatment in N2a cells, FBS content in the growth media was reduced to 3%.

Pharmacological treatments

Pharmacological agents were used in the following concentrations and time courses: cycloheximide (Calbiochem, 0.2 μg/μl, 24 h or 0.1 μg/μl, 16 h), bicuculline (Sigma, 40 μM, 24 h), 4‐aminopyridine (Tocris Bioscience, 50 μM, 24 h), bafilomycin A1 (Millipore, 0.1 μM, 5 h), dexamethasone (Ratiopharm, 10 μM, 48 h), dexamethasone (InvivoGen, 20 μM, 72 h), epoxomicin (Sigma, 0.1 μM) PR‐619 (LifeSensors, 50 μM).

Lentivirus production, transduction, and DNA transfection

DNA constructs were described previously (Sheehan et al, 2016), with the exception of pRK5‐EGFP‐Tau (Addgene plasmid #46904), and pAAV‐CAMKIIa‐EGFP‐Rab35, which was created by subcloning EGFP‐Rab35 into the pAAV‐CAMKIIa‐EGFP vector (Addgene plasmid #50469). Both pAAV‐CAMKIIa‐EGFP‐Rab35 and pAAV‐CAMKIIa‐EGFP were then packaged into AAV8 serotype by the UNC Gene Therapy Center Vector Core (UNC Chapel Hill). Lentivirus was produced as previously described (Sheehan et al, 2016). Neurons were transduced with 50–150 μl of lentiviral supernatant per well (12‐well plates) or 10–40 μl per coverslip (24‐well plates) either at 3 DIV for shRNA transduction or 10 DIV in gain‐of‐function experiments. Respective controls were transduced on the same day for all experimental conditions. Neurons were collected for immunoblotting or immunocytochemistry at 14 DIV.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Immunofluorescence staining in neurons and N2a cells was performed as previously described (Sheehan et al, 2016). Briefly, cells were fixed with Lorene's Fix (60 mM PIPES, 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.12 M sucrose, 4% formaldehyde) for 15 min, and primary and secondary antibody incubations were performed in blocking buffer (2% glycine, 2% BSA, 0.2% gelatin, 50 mM NH4Cl in 1× PBS) overnight at 4°C or for 1 h at room temperature, respectively. For staining of brain slices, coronal vibratome sections (40 μm) of paraformaldehyde‐fixed brains were placed in heated citrate buffer for 15 min. Sections were then permeabilized using 0.5% Triton X‐100 for 30 min, followed by 5 min blocking with Ultravision Protein Block (Thermoscientific). Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in 0.5% Triton/0.2% BSA/0.5% FBS in 1× PBS, and incubation was performed overnight at 4°C or for 3 h at room temperature, respectively. Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope equipped with Airyscan module, using either a 63× objective (Plan‐Apochromat, NA 1.4), for neurons or N2a cell imaging, or a 40× objective (Neofluar, NA 1.4) for imaging of rat brain sections. Primary antibodies are listed in Table EV1.

Proximity ligation assay

Proximity ligation assay (PLA) was performed in N2a cells according to manufacturer's instructions (Duolink, Sigma). Until the PLA probe incubation step, all manipulations were performed as detailed above for the immunocytochemistry procedure. PLA probes were diluted in blocking solution. The primary antibody pairs used were anti‐FLAG (Rabbit; Abcam) and DA9 (anti‐Total Tau, Mouse, gift from Peter Davies), anti‐FLAG (Rabbit, Abcam) and PHF1 (Mouse), anti‐FLAG (Rabbit, Abcam) and CP13 (Mouse), anti‐FLAG (Mouse, Sigma) and pSer262 Tau (Rabbit, ThermoFisher Scientific), anti‐mCherry (Rabbit, Biovision), and DA9 (Mouse, Peter Davies). Additionally, a blocking FLAG peptide (Sigma), used at a 100 μg/ml concentration, was included to evaluate the specificity of the technique. All protocol steps were performed at 37°C in a humidity chamber, except for the washing steps. Coverslips were then mounted using Duolink In situ Mounting Media with DAPI.

Tau immunogold staining and electron microscopy

For electron microscope analysis, rat hippocampi were fixed at 4°C with 4% PFA, then transferred to 4% PFA/0.8% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M of phosphate buffer (PB) for 1 h and afterward, to 0.1 M PB. Vibratome‐cut axial sections of the dorsal hippocampus (300 μm thick) were collected, and CA1 hippocampal area was surgically removed. Tissue was then carefully oriented and embedded in Epon resin, and ultrathin sections (500 Å), encompassing the superficial‐to‐deep axis, were cut onto nickel grids. For Tau immunogold staining, sections were treated with heated citrate buffer (Thermo Scientific) for 30 min and then by 5% BSA. Grids were incubated overnight with Tau5 primary antibody diluted in 1% BSA in PB, followed by secondary gold antibody (Abcam). Grids were imaged on a JEOL JEM‐1400 transmission electron microscope equipped with a Orius Sc1000 digital camera.

Image analysis

Images were analyzed and processed using the Fiji software. PLA puncta were counted using the Multi‐point tool, and cell area was measured with Polygon selection tool. Fluorescence intensity was measured after performing a Z‐projection using the SUM function. For cell bodies, the corrected total cell fluorescence was calculated, by subtracting the average fluorescence of the background of the whole area to the Integrated fluorescence density. For Axons, a mask was created in the mCherry channel, representing the experimental condition, using the same threshold value, and the average fluorescence intensity of the axon was then measure in the other channel. Average fluorescence intensity per slice was measured in images acquired from immunofluorescence stained brain slices.

Coimmunoprecipitation

For coimmunoprecipitation, N2a cells were transfected with Lipofectamine 3000 according to the manufacturer's protocol (Life Technologies). Cell lysates were collected 48 h after transfection, after 3× washes with cold PBS, in Co‐IP lysis buffer (0.1% NP‐40, 1 mM EDTA in 1× PBS) with protease inhibitor (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails II and III (Sigma) and clarified by centrifugation at high speed (10 min, 20,000 g). Protein concentration was determined using the BCA protein assay kit (ThermoFisher Scientific), and the same amount of protein was used for each condition. Lysates were pre‐cleared using magnetic agarose beads (Chromotek) for 1 h at 4°C. For GFP pull down, lysates were incubated with GFP‐Trap Magnetic agarose beads (Chromotek) for 3 h at 4°C. Beads were washed three times with co‐IP lysis buffer and then eluted using 2× sample buffer (Bio‐Rad) and subject to SDS–PAGE immunoblotting as described below.

Western blotting

For Western blotting experiments, neurons were collected using 2× SDS sample buffer (Bio‐Rad). N2a cells were first collected in Lysis Buffer as described previously. Samples were subject to SDS–PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using wet or semi‐dry apparati (Mini Trans‐Blot Cell or Trans‐Blot Turbo Blotting System, respectively, Bio‐Rad), and probed with primary antibody (Table EV1) in 5% BSA/PBS + 0.1% Tween‐20, followed by DyLight 680 or 800 anti‐rabbit, anti‐mouse (Thermo Scientific) or by HRP‐conjugated secondaries (Bio‐Rad). Membranes were imaged using an Odyssey Infrared Imager (model 9120, LI‐COR Biosciences), and protein intensity was measured using the Image Studio Lite software (LI‐COR Biosciences).

Cycloheximide‐chase fold change calculation

In cycloheximide‐chase experiments, the amount of protein remaining after 24 h of cycloheximide treatment was calculated as a fraction of the amount of protein in the DMSO‐treated condition, as previously described (Sheehan et al, 2016). Both levels were previously normalized to the tubulin loading control. The fractional degradative amount of each condition was then normalized to the experimental control by dividing the perturbation condition by the control condition.

Subcellular fractionation with sucrose step gradient

For each gradient, two T75 culture flaks of primary cortical neurons (7,500,000 cells each) were used. All procedures were carried out at 4°C post‐collection and performed as described previously (de Araujo et al, 2008), with slight modifications. Briefly, neurons were detached from the flask with TrypLE Express (Life Technologies) and washed once with ice‐cold Neurobasal and twice with ice‐cold PBS. Neurons were then subject to hypotonic shock and allowed to swell on ice for 15 min. After cell resuspension in isotonic conditions, neurons were gently lysed with 3× freeze–thaw cycles. The lysates were centrifuged (2,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C), and the postnuclear supernatant (PNS) was brought to 40.6% sucrose and loaded in the bottom of a centrifugation tube, overlaid with 35% sucrose, followed by 25% sucrose and then 8% sucrose solution (in ddH2O, 3 mM imidazole, pH 7.4 with protease and phosphatase inhibitors). After centrifugation in a Beckman centrifuge (3 h, 210,000 × g, 4°C), thirteen 100 μl fractions were collected and equal volumes were used for Western blotting, as previously described. Relative protein distribution was calculated after determining the optical density of each fraction and further normalizing against the sum of all fractions. Fractions were divided into different groups according to their respective sucrose gradient.

Real‐time RT–PCR

RNA was extracted from either cortical neurons or N2a cells using TRIzol (Thermo Fischer) and purified using the Direct‐zol RNA MiniPrep Plus kit (Zymo Research). RT–PCR was performed in a StepOnePlus RealTime PCR instrument, with iTaq™ Universal Probes One‐Step Kit (Bio‐Rad), using pre‐designed TaqMan probes. Amplification conditions were the following: initial denaturing at 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s and extension at 60°C for 1 min. Rab35 levels were normalized to either β‐actin (actb) or TATA‐binding protein (tbp). Results presented are normalized to β‐actin.

Flow cytometry

N2a cells were detached using TrypLE Express (Life Technologies), for 5 min at 37°C. After washing, cells were resuspended in ice‐cold Flow Buffer (0.2% FBS, 0.5 mM EDTA in PBS) and strained through a 35‐μm nylon mesh to promote single cell suspensions and kept on ice. Cells were analyzed in a BD Fortessa (BD Biosciences). Unstained cells were used as a control for background fluorescence. Flow Cytometry data were analyzed using FCS Express 6 (DeNovo Software).

Ubiquitylation assay

N2a cells were transfected with vectors encoding GFP‐Tau and HA‐Ubiquitin with either mCherry or mCh‐Rab35. After 48 h, cells were treated with DMSO vehicle or Dexamethasone, and incubated for another 43 h. Cells were then incubated with chloroquine, leupeptin, and epoxomicin for 5 h. Cell lysates were collected, washed 3× with cold PBS in Lysis buffer (50 mm Tris‐Base, 150 mm NaCl, 1% Triton X‐100, 0.5% deoxycholic acid) with protease inhibitor (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails II and III (Sigma), and clarified by centrifugation at high speed (10 min, 20,000 g). Subsequent steps were performed as described in the coimmunoprecipitation section.

Animals and AAV injection

Eight‐ to 10‐month‐old male Wistar rats (Charles River Laboratories, Spain; N = 5 per group) were paired under standard laboratory conditions (8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M.; 22°C) with ad libitum access to food and drink. Animals received daily subcutaneous injections of the synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone (GC) (300 μg/kg; Sigma D1756; dissolved in sesame oil containing 0.01% ethanol; Sigma S3547) for 14 sequential days, while the other half received daily injections of the vehicle solution (sesame oil with 0.01% ethanol). All experimental procedures were approved by the local ethical committee of University of Minho and national authority for animal experimentation; all experiments were in accordance with the guidelines for the care and handling of laboratory animals, as described in the Directive 2010/63/EU. For AAV injection experiment (N = 6–8 per group), animals were anaesthetized with 75 mg/kg ketamine (Imalgene, Merial) plus 0.5 mg/kg medetomidine (Dorbene, Cymedica). Virus was bilaterally injected into the dorsal and ventral hippocampus (coordinates from bregma, according to Paxinos and Watson 50: −3.0  mm anteroposterior (AP), ±1.6  mm mediolateral (ML), and −3.3 mm dorsoventral (DV) and −6.2 mm AP, ±4.5 mm ML, and −6.0 mm DV, respectively). A total of 2 μl was injected at a rate of 200 nl/min, and the needle was kept in place for 7 min before retraction. Rats were removed from the stereotaxic frame, sutured, and allowed to recover for 3 weeks prior to vehicle or dexamethasone treatment.

Subcellular fractionation

To obtain the synaptosome membrane fraction, a previously described fractionation protocol was used (Lopes et al, 2016c). Briefly, hippocampal tissue was homogenized [10 × homogenization buffer (sucrose 9%; 5 mM DTT; 2 mM EDTA; 25 mM Tris, pH 7.4); Complete Protease Inhibitor (Roche), and Phosphatase Inhibitor Mixtures II and III (Sigma)] and centrifuged (1,000 × g). The postnuclear supernatant was subsequently centrifuged (12,500 × g) to yield crude synaptosomal and synaptosome‐depleted fractions. The latter was ultracentrifuged (176,000 × g) to yield a light membrane/Golgi fraction (P3) and a cytoplasmic fraction (S3). The crude synaptosomal fraction was lysed in a hypo‐osmotic solution and then centrifuged (25,000 × g) to obtain the synaptosomal fraction (LP1).

Neurostructural analysis

As previously described, half of each rat brain (N = 6–7 per group) was immersed in Golgi‐Cox solution for 7–10 days. After transfer to tissue protectant solution, vibratome‐cut coronal brain sections (200 μm thick) were used. After development, fixation, and dehydration, slides were used to perform three‐dimensional morphometric analysis. Dendritic arborization and spines were analyzed in dorsal hippocampus (CA1 area). All neuronal dendritic trees were reconstructed at ×600 (oil) magnification using a motorized microscope (Axioplan2, Zeiss) and Neurolucida software (MBF Bioscience). For spine analysis, proximal and distal apical dendritic segments (30 μm) were randomly selected and spines were counted and further classified in immature (thin) and complex/mature (mushroom, wide/thick, and ramified) categories as previously described (Pinheiro et al, 2015). Three different dendritic segments were selected per neuron.

Rab35 glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding

Binding sites were analyzed with the use of the GTRD database (http://gtrd.biouml.org/; Yevshin et al, 2017), which is the largest aggregation of ChIP‐seq experiment raw data for the human and mouse genome from publically available sources (including GEO, SRA, Encode) using a unified alignment and ChIP‐seq peak calling. Peaks were merged into clusters and unique metaclusters (~70 M to ensure that transcription factor binding sites are not non‐redundant). Our analysis focused on the mouse Rab35 gene since there is no such comprehensive Chip‐seq database for other rodents species. In the search for GR binding sites, we permitted a maximum distance of 1,000 nucleotides from Rab35.

Statistical analysis

Graphing and statistics analysis were performed using Prism (GraphPad). Shapiro–Wilk normality test was used to determine whether data sets were modeled by a normal distribution. Unpaired, two‐tailed t‐tests, one‐way ANOVA, or two‐way ANOVAs were used with values of P < 0.05 being considered as significantly different.

Author contributions

JV‐S, IS, and CLW designed the research; JV‐S, MZ, QJ, VZ, PG, SQ, TM, JS, CD, CS‐C, and NPD performed experiments and analyzed data; NS, IS, and CLW supervised experiments; JV‐S, IS, and CLW wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Expanded View Figures PDF

Table EV1

Source Data for Expanded View

Review Process File

Source Data for Figure 2

Source Data for Figure 3

Source Data for Figure 5

Source Data for Figure 6

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Peter Davies (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, USA) for the generous gift of Tau antibodies, Dr. Karen Ashe for pRK5‐EGFP‐Tau and pRK5‐EGFP‐Tau E14 (Addgene plasmids #46904 and #46907), and Dr. Ed Boyden for pAAV‐CAMKIIa‐EGFP vector (Addgene plasmid #50469). We also thank Dr. Mark Churchland (CUMC) and Fidel Martinez (Bronx FedEx station) for their help in recovering a valuable package. This work was supported by NIH grants R01NS080967 and R21MH104803 to C.L.W., Portuguese Foundation for Science & Technology (FCT) PhD fellowships to J. Vaz‐Silva and T. Meira (PD/BD/105938/2014; PD/BD/113700/2015, respectively), and the following grants to I.S.: FCT Investigator grant IF/01799/2013, the Portuguese North Regional Operational Program (ON.2) under the National Strategic Reference Framework (QREN), through the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), the Project Estratégico co‐funded by FCT (PEst‐C/SAU/LA0026/2013) and the European Regional Development Fund COMPETE (FCOMP‐01‐0124‐FEDER‐037298) as well as the project NORTE‐01‐0145‐FEDER‐000013, supported by the Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER).

The EMBO Journal (2018) 37: e99084

References

  1. de Araujo ME, Huber LA, Stasyk T (2008) Isolation of endocytic organelles by density gradient centrifugation. Methods Mol Biol 424: 317–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caballero B, Wang Y, Diaz A, Tasset I, Juste YR, Stiller B, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E, Cuervo AM (2017) Interplay of pathogenic forms of human tau with different autophagic pathways. Aging Cell 17: e12692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chesser AS, Pritchard SM, Johnson GV (2013) Tau clearance mechanisms and their possible role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. Front Neurol 4: 122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clayton EL, Mizielinska S, Edgar JR, Nielsen TT, Marshall S, Norona FE, Robbins M, Damirji H, Holm IE, Johannsen P, Nielsen JE, Asante EA, Collinge J, FReJA Consortium , Isaacs AM (2015) Frontotemporal dementia caused by CHMP2B mutation is characterised by neuronal lysosomal storage pathology. Acta Neuropathol 130: 511–523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dioli C, Patricio P, Trindade R, Pinto LG, Silva JM, Morais M, Ferreiro E, Borges S, Mateus‐Pinheiro A, Rodrigues AJ, Sousa N, Bessa JM, Pinto L, Sotiropoulos I (2017) Tau‐dependent suppression of adult neurogenesis in the stressed hippocampus. Mol Psychiatry 22: 1110–1118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edgar JR, Willen K, Gouras GK, Futter CE (2015) ESCRTs regulate amyloid precursor protein sorting in multivesicular bodies and intracellular amyloid‐beta accumulation. J Cell Sci 128: 2520–2528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fernandes AC, Uytterhoeven V, Kuenen S, Wang YC, Slabbaert JR, Swerts J, Kasprowicz J, Aerts S, Verstreken P (2014) Reduced synaptic vesicle protein degradation at lysosomes curbs TBC1D24/sky‐induced neurodegeneration. J Cell Biol 207: 453–462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frandemiche ML, De Seranno S, Rush T, Borel E, Elie A, Arnal I, Lante F, Buisson A (2014) Activity‐dependent tau protein translocation to excitatory synapse is disrupted by exposure to amyloid‐beta oligomers. J Neurosci 34: 6084–6097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frankel EB, Audhya A (2017) ESCRT‐dependent cargo sorting at multivesicular endosomes. Semin Cell Dev Biol 74: 4–10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Georgieva ER, Xiao S, Borbat PP, Freed JH, Eliezer D (2014) Tau binds to lipid membrane surfaces via short amphipathic helices located in its microtubule‐binding repeats. Biophys J 107: 1441–1452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Green KN, Billings LM, Roozendaal B, McGaugh JL, LaFerla FM (2006) Glucocorticoids increase amyloid‐beta and tau pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 26: 9047–9056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo T, Noble W, Hanger DP (2017) Roles of tau protein in health and disease. Acta Neuropathol 133: 665–704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hamano T, Gendron TF, Causevic E, Yen SH, Lin WL, Isidoro C, Deture M, Ko LW (2008) Autophagic‐lysosomal perturbation enhances tau aggregation in transfectants with induced wild‐type tau expression. Eur J Neurosci 27: 1119–1130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoover BR, Reed MN, Su J, Penrod RD, Kotilinek LA, Grant MK, Pitstick R, Carlson GA, Lanier LM, Yuan LL, Ashe KH, Liao D (2010) Tau mislocalization to dendritic spines mediates synaptic dysfunction independently of neurodegeneration. Neuron 68: 1067–1081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ittner LM, Ke YD, Delerue F, Bi M, Gladbach A, van Eersel J, Wolfing H, Chieng BC, Christie MJ, Napier IA, Eckert A, Staufenbiel M, Hardeman E, Gotz J (2010) Dendritic function of tau mediates amyloid‐beta toxicity in Alzheimer's disease mouse models. Cell 142: 387–397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johansson L, Guo X, Waern M, Ostling S, Gustafson D, Bengtsson C, Skoog I (2010) Midlife psychological stress and risk of dementia: a 35‐year longitudinal population study. Brain 133: 2217–2224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kett LR, Dauer WT (2016) Endolysosomal dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: recent developments and future challenges. Mov Disord 31: 1433–1443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Khanna MR, Kovalevich J, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Brunden KR (2016) Therapeutic strategies for the treatment of tauopathies: hopes and challenges. Alzheimers Dement 12: 1051–1065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kimura T, Yamashita S, Fukuda T, Park JM, Murayama M, Mizoroki T, Yoshiike Y, Sahara N, Takashima A (2007) Hyperphosphorylated tau in parahippocampal cortex impairs place learning in aged mice expressing wild‐type human tau. EMBO J 26: 5143–5152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kobayashi S, Tanaka T, Soeda Y, Almeida OFX, Takashima A (2017) Local somatodendritic translation and hyperphosphorylation of tau protein triggered by AMPA and NMDA receptor stimulation. EBioMedicine 20: 120–126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kontaxi C, Piccardo P, Gill AC (2017) Lysine‐directed post‐translational modifications of tau protein in Alzheimer's disease and related tauopathies. Front Mol Biosci 4: 56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee MJ, Lee JH, Rubinsztein DC (2013) Tau degradation: the ubiquitin‐proteasome system versus the autophagy‐lysosome system. Prog Neurobiol 105: 49–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lopes S, Lopes A, Pinto V, Guimaraes MR, Sardinha VM, Duarte‐Silva S, Pinheiro S, Pizarro J, Oliveira JF, Sousa N, Leite‐Almeida H, Sotiropoulos I (2016a) Absence of Tau triggers age‐dependent sciatic nerve morphofunctional deficits and motor impairment. Aging Cell 15: 208–216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lopes S, Teplytska L, Vaz‐Silva J, Dioli C, Trindade R, Morais M, Webhofer C, Maccarrone G, Almeida OF, Turck CW, Sousa N, Sotiropoulos I, Filiou MD (2016b) Tau deletion prevents stress‐induced dendritic atrophy in prefrontal cortex: role of synaptic mitochondria. Cereb Cortex 27: 2580–2591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lopes S, Vaz‐Silva J, Pinto V, Dalla C, Kokras N, Bedenk B, Mack N, Czisch M, Almeida OF, Sousa N, Sotiropoulos I (2016c) Tau protein is essential for stress‐induced brain pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: E3755–E3763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Machado A, Herrera AJ, de Pablos RM, Espinosa‐Oliva AM, Sarmiento M, Ayala A, Venero JL, Santiago M, Villaran RF, Delgado‐Cortes MJ, Arguelles S, Cano J (2014) Chronic stress as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. Rev Neurosci 25: 785–804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maminska A, Bartosik A, Banach‐Orlowska M, Pilecka I, Jastrzebski K, Zdzalik‐Bielecka D, Castanon I, Poulain M, Neyen C, Wolinska‐Niziol L, Torun A, Szymanska E, Kowalczyk A, Piwocka K, Simonsen A, Stenmark H, Furthauer M, Gonzalez‐Gaitan M, Miaczynska M (2016) ESCRT proteins restrict constitutive NF‐kappaB signaling by trafficking cytokine receptors. Sci Signal 9: ra8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mondragon‐Rodriguez S, Trillaud‐Doppia E, Dudilot A, Bourgeois C, Lauzon M, Leclerc N, Boehm J (2012) Interaction of endogenous tau protein with synaptic proteins is regulated by N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor‐dependent tau phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 287: 32040–32053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nixon RA, Yang DS (2011) Autophagy failure in Alzheimer's disease–locating the primary defect. Neurobiol Dis 43: 38–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Oshima R, Hasegawa T, Tamai K, Sugeno N, Yoshida S, Kobayashi J, Kikuchi A, Baba T, Futatsugi A, Sato I, Satoh K, Takeda A, Aoki M, Tanaka N (2016) ESCRT‐0 dysfunction compromises autophagic degradation of protein aggregates and facilitates ER stress‐mediated neurodegeneration via apoptotic and necroptotic pathways. Sci Rep 6: 24997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pallas‐Bazarra N, Jurado‐Arjona J, Navarrete M, Esteban JA, Hernandez F, Avila J, Llorens‐Martin M (2016) Novel function of Tau in regulating the effects of external stimuli on adult hippocampal neurogenesis. EMBO J 35: 1417–1436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pinheiro S, Silva J, Mota C, Vaz‐Silva J, Veloso A, Pinto V, Sousa N, Cerqueira J, Sotiropoulos I (2015) Tau mislocation in glucocorticoid‐triggered hippocampal pathology. Mol Neurobiol 53: 4745–4753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pooler AM, Hanger DP (2010) Functional implications of the association of tau with the plasma membrane. Biochem Soc Trans 38: 1012–1015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Raiborg C, Stenmark H (2009) The ESCRT machinery in endosomal sorting of ubiquitylated membrane proteins. Nature 458: 445–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rivero‐Rios P, Gomez‐Suaga P, Fernandez B, Madero‐Perez J, Schwab AJ, Ebert AD, Hilfiker S (2015) Alterations in late endocytic trafficking related to the pathobiology of LRRK2‐linked Parkinson's disease. Biochem Soc Trans 43: 390–395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Roberson ED, Scearce‐Levie K, Palop JJ, Yan F, Cheng IH, Wu T, Gerstein H, Yu GQ, Mucke L (2007) Reducing endogenous tau ameliorates amyloid beta‐induced deficits in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Science 316: 750–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ross JA, Gliebus G, Van Bockstaele EJ (2017) Stress induced neural reorganization: a conceptual framework linking depression and Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 85: 136–151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sahu R, Kaushik S, Clement CC, Cannizzo ES, Scharf B, Follenzi A, Potolicchio I, Nieves E, Cuervo AM, Santambrogio L (2011) Microautophagy of cytosolic proteins by late endosomes. Dev Cell 20: 131–139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sheehan P, Zhu M, Beskow A, Vollmer C, Waites CL (2016) Activity‐Dependent Degradation of Synaptic Vesicle Proteins Requires Rab35 and the ESCRT Pathway. J Neurosci 36: 8668–8686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Small SA, Simoes‐Spassov S, Mayeux R, Petsko GA (2017) Endosomal traffick jams represent a pathogenic hub and therapeutic target in Alzheimer's disease. Trends Neurosci 40: 592–602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sotiropoulos I, Catania C, Riedemann T, Fry JP, Breen KC, Michaelidis TM, Almeida OF (2008a) Glucocorticoids trigger Alzheimer disease‐like pathobiochemistry in rat neuronal cells expressing human tau. J Neurochem 107: 385–397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sotiropoulos I, Cerqueira JJ, Catania C, Takashima A, Sousa N, Almeida OF (2008b) Stress and glucocorticoid footprints in the brain‐the path from depression to Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32: 1161–1173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sotiropoulos I, Catania C, Pinto LG, Silva R, Pollerberg GE, Takashima A, Sousa N, Almeida OF (2011) Stress acts cumulatively to precipitate Alzheimer's disease‐like tau pathology and cognitive deficits. J Neurosci 31: 7840–7847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sotiropoulos I, Galas MC, Silva JM, Skoulakis E, Wegmann S, Maina MB, Blum D, Sayas CL, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E, Spillantini MG, Sousa N, Avila J, Medina M, Mudher A, Buee L (2017) Atypical, non‐standard functions of the microtubule associated Tau protein. Acta Neuropathol Commun 5: 91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sousa N, Almeida OF (2012) Disconnection and reconnection: the morphological basis of (mal)adaptation to stress. Trends Neurosci 35: 742–751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Subach FV, Subach OM, Gundorov IS, Morozova KS, Piatkevich KD, Cuervo AM, Verkhusha VV (2009) Monomeric fluorescent timers that change color from blue to red report on cellular trafficking. Nat Chem Biol 5: 118–126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Suzuki K, Parker CC, Pentchev PG, Katz D, Ghetti B, D'Agostino AN, Carstea ED (1995) Neurofibrillary tangles in Niemann‐Pick disease type C. Acta Neuropathol 89: 227–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vossel KA, Zhang K, Brodbeck J, Daub AC, Sharma P, Finkbeiner S, Cui B, Mucke L (2010) Tau reduction prevents Abeta‐induced defects in axonal transport. Science 330: 198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vyas S, Rodrigues AJ, Silva JM, Tronche F, Almeida OF, Sousa N, Sotiropoulos I (2016) Chronic stress and glucocorticoids: from neuronal plasticity to neurodegeneration. Neural Plast 2016: 6391686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Watson JA, Bhattacharyya BJ, Vaden JH, Wilson JA, Icyuz M, Howard AD, Phillips E, DeSilva TM, Siegal GP, Bean AJ, King GD, Phillips SE, Miller RJ, Wilson SM (2015) Motor and sensory deficits in the teetering mice result from mutation of the ESCRT component HGS. PLoS Genet 11: e1005290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yevshin I, Sharipov R, Valeev T, Kel A, Kolpakov F (2017) GTRD: a database of transcription factor binding sites identified by ChIP‐seq experiments. Nucleic Acids Res 45: D61–D67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yin Y, Gao D, Wang Y, Wang ZH, Wang X, Ye J, Wu D, Fang L, Pi G, Yang Y, Wang XC, Lu C, Ye K, Wang JZ (2016) Tau accumulation induces synaptic impairment and memory deficit by calcineurin‐mediated inactivation of nuclear CaMKIV/CREB signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: E3773–E3781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zempel H, Thies E, Mandelkow E, Mandelkow EM (2010) Abeta oligomers cause localized Ca(2+) elevation, missorting of endogenous Tau into dendrites, Tau phosphorylation, and destruction of microtubules and spines. J Neurosci 30: 11938–11950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang JY, Liu SJ, Li HL, Wang JZ (2005) Microtubule‐associated protein tau is a substrate of ATP/Mg(2+)‐dependent proteasome protease system. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 112: 547–555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhao Y, Ponnusamy M, Liu Y (2017a) The role of ubiquitin proteasomal system and autophagy‐lysosome pathway in Alzheimer's disease. Rev Neurosci 28: 861–868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang Y, Schmid B, Nikolaisen NK, Rasmussen MA, Aldana BI, Agger M, Calloe K, Stummann TC, Larsen HM, Nielsen TT, Huang J, Xu F, Liu X, Bolund L, Meyer M, Bak LK, Waagepetersen HS, Luo Y, Nielsen JE, FReJA Consortium et al (2017b) Patient iPSC‐derived neurons for disease modeling of frontotemporal dementia with mutation in CHMP2B. Stem Cell Reports 8: 648–658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Expanded View Figures PDF

Table EV1

Source Data for Expanded View

Review Process File

Source Data for Figure 2

Source Data for Figure 3

Source Data for Figure 5

Source Data for Figure 6


Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES