Zambia has experienced recurrent cholera outbreaks since the late 1970s, primarily during the rainy season. The 2017–2018 cholera outbreak started on October 6, 2017, initially localized to 2 peri-urban areas of Lusaka, the capital, and was linked to contaminated water consumption. From mid-December 2017 to early February 2018 cases spread city-wide, with 3938 cases and 82 deaths (case fatality rate, 2.1%) by February 17, 2018 (Figure 1).
Previous studies in Lusaka documented high levels of contamination of groundwater sources [1, 2] and implicated certain foods in cholera transmission [3, 4]. Inadequate drainage networks have also been associated with cholera incidence in Lusaka [5]. Initial investigations in this outbreak found widespread fecal contamination of water sources (piped water, private boreholes, and shallow wells), household stored water, and market food. Municipal piped water, 60% of which comes from groundwater sources, is intermittently available across Lusaka.
Emergency Response Activation, Coordination, and Communication
The Ministry of Health (MoH), through the Zambia National Public Health Institute, implemented a multisectoral approach to fighting this epidemic including the Health, Local Government, Education, Water Development, Sanitation, and Environmental Protection sectors with additional support through the National Disaster Management and Mitigation Unit and the national defense wings to support emergency public health interventions.
Interventions
Communication
Communication and temporary policy changes played an important role in the cholera response. The dramatic rise in cases occurred during the school holiday when many students temporarily visit Lusaka. To try to limit the geographic expansion of the outbreak beyond Lusaka through travel, the reopening of schools was delayed. A number of markets were closed throughout the city, and street vending of food was prohibited. These closures along with a mass media campaign were meant to increase cholera prevention awareness, to encourage rapid healthcare seeking and to reduce transmission.
Water Monitoring, Chlorination, and Tank Provision
To ensure adequate supply and access to safe water, 280 new water tanks and 69 extra tap stands were strategically placed in affected areas, serving free disinfected water to approximately 1.2 million people. To improve water safety at the household level, more than 1 million bottles of chlorine and health promotional materials were distributed door to door in high-risk areas. In addition, more than 1500 shallow wells, deemed unsafe, were buried.
A water source-monitoring program to test for residual chlorine levels and Escherichia coli in randomly selected households’ water sources was implemented. Of 220 water sources tested during January 2018, 73% had inadequate residual free chlorine (<0.2 mg/L) and 31% were E coli positive; boreholes (34%) and shallow wells (91%) were the most contaminated. Daily reports were provided to the water utility company for immediate corrective action.
Case Management
With the rise in cases, MoH mobilized healthcare professionals to reinforce case management in cholera treatment centers (CTCs) aiming to reduce the case fatality rate to <1%. The CTC assessments and healthcare worker knowledge surveys guided focus areas for mentorship and training. The establishment of a centralized CTC at Heroes National Stadium consolidated case management resources and expertise, which was especially useful for complicated cases.
Oral Cholera Vaccination Campaign
The Oral Cholera Vaccination (OCV) campaign has been effective in the control of cholera outbreaks in various settings [6]. The MoH targeted 1.2 million people in high-incidence neighborhoods of Lusaka with OCV (Euvichol-Plus) from the global OCV stockpile. The new plastic presentation, in addition to the large number of personnel with experience from the previous year’s OCV campaign and other logistic resources, allowed for a large number of vaccines to be easily transported and stored; in contrast to experience with OCV from a previous outbreak [7], this new presentation allowed for all 1.2 million doses to be delivered within 10 days in the first round. In addition, this new plastic presentation can be taken out of the cold chain on day of administration, which simplifies campaign logistics.
The outbreak presented a number of challenges including inadequate laboratory capacity for culture confirmation, the rapid spread of the outbreak across Lusaka, and the need to quickly train and equip a cholera response workforce. Stigma associated with cholera was also thought to contribute to a delay in seeking healthcare and a high percentage of community deaths.
In response to a rapidly accelerating outbreak, where cases surged from several hundred to several thousand in less than 1 month, the government of Zambia mounted a rapid and robust public health response that included provision of emergency water supplies, water source monitoring and chlorination, enhanced surveillance and epidemiologic investigations, case management training, mass vaccination with significant uptake, community sensitization, and activated a well coordinated emergency response.
CONCLUSIONS
Cholera outbreaks do not have to occur in Zambia. To achieve a cholera-free Zambia, both short-term and long-term solutions are needed. Zambia recently developed a national multisectoral cholera elimination plan, which encompasses provision of clean water supply, sanitation, community engagement, and health education, in addition to vaccination of more than 2 million people in key cholera hotspots, which is expected to reduce cholera risk immediately; in addition, there are plans for revaccination of hotspots every 3 years. Ultimately, cholera prevention efforts should focus on improving access to safe water through increasing the capacity of the water utility company to meet the needs of all populations, improving sanitation facilities and solid waste management by the Municipal Council, and promoting hygiene behavior change. Finally, enhanced surveillance through Zambia’s Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response will allow outbreaks to be detected early and rapidly contained.
Notes
Supplement sponsorship. This work is part of a supplement sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
- 1. Sorensen JP, Lapworth DJ, Nkhuwa DC, et al. . Emerging contaminants in urban groundwater sources in Africa. Water Res 2015; 72:51–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sorensen JP, Lapworth DJ, Read DS, et al. . Tracing enteric pathogen contamination in sub-Saharan African groundwater. Sci Total Environ 2015; 538:888–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cholera epidemic associated with raw vegetables--Lusaka, Zambia, 2003–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53:783–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. DuBois AE, Sinkala M, Kalluri P, Makasa-Chikoya M, Quick RE. Epidemic cholera in urban Zambia: hand soap and dried fish as protective factors. Epidemiol Infect 2006; 134:1226–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sasaki S, Suzuki H, Fujino Y, Kimura Y, Cheelo M. Impact of drainage networks on cholera outbreaks in Lusaka, Zambia. Am J Public Health 2009; 99:1982–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bi Q, Ferreras E, Pezzoli L, et al. . Protection against cholera from killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17:1080–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ferreras E, Chizema-Kawesha E, Blake A, et al. . Single-dose cholera vaccine in response to an outbreak in Zambia. N Engl J Med 2018; 378:577–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]