Abstract
Neutrophils are critical for the defense against pathogens, in part through the extrusion of extracellular DNA traps, phagocytosis, and the production of reactive oxygen species. Neutrophils may also play an important role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) through the activation of protein arginine deiminases (PADs) that citrullinate proteins that subsequently act as autoantigens. We report that PAD4 is physically associated with the cytosolic subunits of the oxidative burst machinery, p47phox (also known as neutrophil cytosol factor 1, NCF1) and p67phox (NCF2). Activation of PAD4 by membranolytic insults that result in high levels of intracellular calcium (higher than physiological neutrophil activation) leads to rapid citrullination of p47phox/NCF1 and p67phox/NCF2, as well as their dissociation from PAD4. This dissociation prevents the assembly of an active NADPH oxidase complex and an oxidative burst in neutrophils stimulated by phorbol-ester or immune complexes. In further support of a substrate-to-inactive enzyme interaction, small-molecule PAD inhibitors also disrupt the PAD4-NCF complex and reduce oxidase activation and phagocytic killing of Staphylococcus aureus. This novel role of PAD4 in the regulation of neutrophil physiology suggests that targeting PAD4 with active site inhibitors for the treatment of RA may have a broader impact on neutrophil biology than just inhibition of citrullination.
Introduction
Neutrophils are critically important for our defense against bacterial pathogens1,2. They are among the very first responders to sites of tissue injury and bacterial infection, where they use a large repertoire of receptors for bacterial and pro-inflammatory stimuli to trigger a range of responses that include the extrusion of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)3–7, phagocytosis1,8, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production9–11, and the secretion of numerous proteases and pro-inflammatory mediators12,13.
Neutrophils are also attracting increasing attention as likely culprits in human diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA)14–16 and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)17–20. In RA, neutrophils accumulate in the synovial fluid in the early stages of the disease21,22 and appear to be responsible for the increase in citrullination of numerous proteins observed in the synovial fluid of inflamed joints22–25. Approximately 70% of RA patients test positive for antibodies against citrullinated cyclic peptides (anti-CCPs)26,27, and have antibodies reactive with specific citrullinated epitopes in proteins such as filaggrin, fibrinogen, vimentin28, α-enolase, and histones14,15. Further support for an important role of protein citrullination in RA pathogenesis comes from genetic association studies, which implicated first PADI429–33 and later also PADI234 in the susceptibility to RA. These genes encode for the Ca2+-dependent protein arginine deiminases (PAD) 4 and 2, respectively, which catalyze the conversion of arginine to citrulline in protein substrates35–38.
Neutrophils express both PAD2 and PAD439,40. The former is found in many cell types, while the latter is more restricted to hematopoietic cells with highest levels in neutrophils. PAD4 contains a putative nuclear localization sequence41, but resides mostly in cytosolic structures in resting neutrophils40. PAD4 can also enter the nucleus to citrullinate histones42 and transcription factors43, and thereby participate in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression44 and stem cell differentiation43. Histone citrullination has also been implicated in the formation of NETs45–48, a complex process driven by multiple signaling pathways and that depends on ROS production (at least for some stimuli such as phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)) and involves a large transcriptional program49. Extruded NETs serve to trap bacteria3 and aid in the subsequent phagocytosis and killing process. NET formation can be induced by many stimuli48, including PMA, immune complexes, and live bacteria. Dysregulation of NET extrusion has been proposed to play a role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune conditions7,14,16–19,50, although it remains unclear if extracellular DNA and histones found in kidneys of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis17, or in the circulation of patients with SLE18,19, originate only from NETs or also from other forms of tissue damage and cell death. In addition, a recent paper has shown that PAD4 can citrullinate NF-κB p65 to promote its nuclear translocation51.
We have found that two cytosolic subunits of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, p47phox (also known as neutrophil cytosol factor 1, NCF1) and p67phox (neutrophil cytosol factor 2, NCF2) are citrullinated in primary human neutrophils upon activation of PADs by membranolytic stimuli. Furthermore, NCF1 has been found to be citrullinated in synovial fluid from RA patients24,25. NADPH oxidase is the main ROS machinery in neutrophils, and its activation is key in bacterial killing8–11. We provide evidence that PAD4 in neutrophils associates with NCF1 and NCF2, translocates with them during NADPH oxidase activation, and is important in ROS production and bacterial killing. This association requires PAD4 to remain inactive (i.e., a non-enzymatic function); conversely PAD4-mediated citrullination of NCF proteins dissociates the complexes and impairs ROS generation. Disruption of the NADPH oxidase-PAD4 complex by other means also inhibits ROS production, leading to reduced killing of bacteria.
Results
Citrullination of cytosolic subunits of NADPH oxidase
Neutrophils subjected to membranolytic agents that cause a rapid and lethal influx of calcium undergo a rapid citrullination of multiple cellular proteins23,52,53. This response was termed ‘lethal hypercitrullination’ by Konig and Andrade53 and results in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations that exceed the physiological receptor-triggered Ca2+ mobilization response by 2–3 orders of magnitude. We used LC-MS/MS to identify a set of proteins that became citrullinated after treatment of human neutrophils with 1 µM ionomycin (in medium with 2 mM Ca2+) or perforin (data not shown). Several of these proteins, including the cytosolic subunits p47phox (NCF1) and p67phox (NCF2), were also reported to be citrullinated in the synovial fluid of a RA patient in a recent paper24. We found p47phox/NCF1 to be citrullinated at 6 arginine residues (R7, R70, R85, R90, R335, R336) and p67phox/NCF2 at 4 (R184, R188, R238, R328) (Table 1, Fig. S1). None of these sites were detected in untreated neutrophils. These results suggest that NADPH oxidase subunits are citrullinated during calcium influx driven PAD activation. Interestingly, the citrullinated residues are located in the PX domain and in the middle of the phosphorylated tail of NCF1 and on either side of the N-terminal SH3 domain of NCF2. The locations are in regions known to be involved in protein-protein interactions. In addition, R90 in NCF1 is also the site of a polymorphism, R90H, associated with systemic lupus erythematosus54–57.
Table 1.
Annotated Peptide Sequence | Modifications | Donors (Total =4) | Protein |
---|---|---|---|
WFDGQr(cit)AAENR | R85(Citrulline) | 4 | NCF1 |
WFDGQr(cit)AAENr(cit)QGTLTEYcSTLMSLPTK | R85(Citrulline) R90(Citrulline); | 1 | NCF1 |
EMFPIEAGAINPENr(cit)IIPHLPAPK | R70(Citrulline | 1 | NCF1 |
FLQqr(cit)r(cit)RqARPGPQSPGSPLEEER | Q334(Deamidated) R335(Citrulline) R336(Citrulline) Q338(Deamidated) | 1 | NCF1 |
GDTFIr(cit)HIALLGFEK | R7(Citrulline); | 1 | NCF1 |
APGr(cit)PQLSPGQK | R328(Citrulline) | 2 | NCF2 |
LFr(cit)PNEr(cit)QVAQLAK | R184(Citrulline); R188(Citrulline) | 1 | NCF2 |
TPEIFr(cit)ALEGEAHR | R238(Citrulline) | 2 | NCF2 |
Co-immunoprecipitation of PAD4 with cytosolic subunits of NADPH oxidase
As binding between an enzyme and its substrate is sometimes more stable, we tested if PAD4 and p47phox/NCF1 or p67phox/NCF2 could be co-immunoprecipitated. PAD4 or PAD2 were immunoprecipitated from untreated neutrophils from healthy donors and immunoblotted with specific antibodies to the NCF proteins. As shown in Fig. 1, p47phox/NCF1 and p67phox/NCF2 were both readily detected in anti-PAD4, but not in anti-PAD2, immunoprecipitates. The reverse experiment was also true: immunoprecipitates obtained with antibodies to NCF1 and NCF2 contained immunoreactive PAD4 (Fig. 1).
Co-localization of PAD4 with NCF1 in intact neutrophils
Activation of the oxidative burst machinery is known to involve the translocation of the cytosolic subunits p47phox/NCF1 and p67phox/NCF2 to the phagosome or plasma membrane where the NADPH oxidase gp91 and p22 reside8–11. To visualize these events and to determine how PAD4 behaves during PMA-induced activation of the oxidase, we stained NADPH oxidase in freshly isolated neutrophils. As we reported recently40, PAD4 was found in resting neutrophils in a set of cytoplasmic granular structures with some nuclear localization in ~1% of the cells (Fig. 2a, first panel). In the same cells, gp91 was also found in scattered structures (second panel), which overlapped only to a low extent with PAD4 (third and fourth panels). However, upon treatment of the cells with PMA, both proteins became much more prominently co-localized in larger vesicular structures (Fig. 2a, second row). Very similar results were observed with PAD4 and NCF1: some co-localization in resting neutrophils and a pronounced co-localization in cells treated with phorbol ester (Fig. 2b). In agreement with this, we found that co-immunoprecipitation also improved after PMA treatment (see Fig. 3).
PAD4 activation by calcium influx disrupts NCF1-PAD4 interaction
To examine whether ionomycin-induced citrullination of NCF1 and 2 affects their association with PAD4, freshly isolated neutrophils were treated with ionomycin, phorbol ester (which activates NADPH oxidase) alone or together with diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) which blocks NADPH oxidase. Figure 3a shows the citrullination of cellular proteins after these stimuli. When anti-PAD4 immunoprecipitates from these cells were immunoblotted with anti-NCF1 antibodies, it was clear that ionomycin-treatment abolished any detectable association, while PMA treatment increased it (Fig. 3b). Consistent with these results, analysis of anti-PAD4 immunoprecipitates by mass spectrometry detected unmodified (i.e. not citrullinated) peptides of NCF1 in samples from resting or PMA-treated cells, but not from ionomycin-treated cells (Table S1). The presence of unmodified peptides from NCF1 and 2, but a complete absence of citrullinated peptides, in anti-PAD4 immunoprecipitates from neutrophils supports the notion that citrullination disrupts the association with PAD4.
By immunofluorescence, we also note that PAD4 and NCF1 are poorly co-localized in ionomycin pretreated cells after PMA stimulation (Fig. 3c). There also was no detectable relocation to the plasma membrane or larger cytosolic vesicles.
Calcium influx-driven citrullination also blocks ROS generation
As a first test of a possible functional importance of PAD4-NCF association and/or NCF citrullination, we measured the PMA-induced oxidative burst of neutrophils pretreated with ionomycin or medium alone. When stimulated with PMA, NADPH oxidase activation greatly increased neutrophil consumption of oxygen (Fig. 3d). However, when the neutrophils were first treated with ionomycin, PMA-induced ROS generation was completely inhibited (Fig. 3d). These results suggest that dissociation from PAD4, NCF citrullination, or unrelated ionomycin-induced events impair the oxidative burst in neutrophils.
Small-molecule inhibitors of PAD4 disrupt NCF association and inhibit ROS generation
Since the PAD4-NCF interaction occurred in the absence of citrullination, and appears to be disrupted by citrullination of NCF, we hypothesized that this interaction may involve the substrate-binding catalytic site of PAD4. Using two commercially available small-molecule PAD4 inhibitors, BB-Cl-amidine and GSK484 that bind to the active site of PAD446,58, we found that NCF proteins can no longer be co-immunoprecipitated with PAD4 after a brief treatment of neutrophils with these drugs (Fig. 4a–d). The two inhibitors also reduced the co-immunoprecipitation of gp91 with anti-NCF1 antibodies from PMA-treated neutrophils (Fig. S2). By immunofluorescence, we also note that PAD4 and NCF1 are poorly co-localized in BB-Cl-amidine pretreated cells after PMA stimulation (Fig. 4e). There also was no detectable relocation to the plasma membrane or larger cytosolic vesicles. Furthermore, both drugs blocked PMA-stimulated ROS generation in neutrophils similarly to NADPH oxidase inhibitor DPI (Fig. 4f). Taken together, these data suggest that PAD4 association is important for NADPH oxidase activation in neutrophils.
PAD4 knockdown reduces and PAD4 overexpression increases ROS in HL60 cells
Since small-molecule inhibitors may also have unintended (unknown) effects, we examined the role of PAD4 in NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS generation by shRNA-mediated knock-down of PAD4 protein in the promyelocytic cell line HL60, which can be differentiated to a neutrophil-like phenotype with 0.85% N,N-dimethylformamide. During this differentiation, PAD4 expression increases to a level comparable to that in human neutrophils. Two independent shRNAs resulted in approximately 95 and 80% knock-down of PAD4 proteins, whereas PAD2 and NCFs protein expression were unaffected (Fig. 5a–e). ROS generation was also reduced by approximately 50% in the PAD4-knockdown cells compared to control cells (Fig. 5f). In contrast, PMA-induced ROS generation was increased when PAD4 was overexpressed in HL60 cells (Fig. S3). Like neutrophils, differentiated HL60 produced high levels of ROS after PMA stimulation, and ROS generation was inhibited by BB-Cl-amidine, GSK484, and ionomycin/calcium treatment (Fig. 5g). These results further indicate PAD4 protein plays a permissive role in NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS generation.
Killing of phagocytosed Staphylococci is reduced by PAD4 inhibitors
To place our findings in a more physiologically relevant context, we tested whether disruption of the association of PAD4 with the oxidative burst machinery would affect phagocytosis and killing of live Staphylococcus aureus. We found that neutrophils treated with BB-Cl-amidine, GSK484, or ionomycin/calcium for 15 min significantly reduced the killing of live S. aureus measured at 1 h after addition of the bacteria (Fig. 6a), but had no effects at all on the uptake of bacteria by phagocytosis measured at 30 min (Fig. 6b). These data support the notion that PAD4 association with NCF proteins is important for effective killing of bacteria by human neutrophils.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated how PAD4 impacts ROS generation and bacterial killing. Our data show that PAD4 is physically associated with the cytosolic subunits of NADPH oxidase in resting neutrophils. This association increases and is essential for the assembly of active NADPH oxidase and ROS production following stimulation. The association does not require citrullination, rather citrullination leads to dissociation of the complexes (Fig. 7), suppression of NADPH oxidase assembly, ROS production, and impaired killing of phagocytized bacteria.
Our finding is the first evidence of a direct interaction between two central neutrophil enzymes in innate immunity and human disease: PAD4 and NADPH oxidase. Citrullination by PAD4 in neutrophils has gained recent attention because it appears to be responsible for the generation of modified autoantigens that drive autoimmunity in RA16,17,22,23. There is also a lot of interest in the role of citrullination in NET formation, which may play a role in the initiation of multiple diseases associated with extracellular DNA. However, the physiological functions of PADs remain largely unclear. Our discovery of a PAD4 - NADPH oxidase association links PAD4 to ROS production, which is critical for neutrophil function. ROS is indispensable for phagocytosis killing. With fewer mitochondria than other leukocytes59, NADPH oxidase is the critical source of ROS production in neutrophils.
Dysregulation of NADPH oxidase activity has been associated with autoimmunity54–57,60. Recently, a missense SNP variation in NCF1 was found to be associated with several autoimmune conditions. Interestingly, this SNP converts R90 to histidine and reduces ROS production56. It is therefore very interesting that R90 is one of the residues we find to be citrullinated in NCF1 after ionomycin treatment (Table 1). Elevated levels of NCF1 citrullination were also observed in synovial fluid from RA patients24,25. Since disruption of PAD4 - NADPH oxidase association by citrullination abolishes ROS production, this raises the possibility that NCF1 SNP variants may also impact PAD4 interaction, reduce NADPH oxidase activity and influence autoimmunity.
We recently reported that a portion of neutrophil PAD4 is accessible to extracellular anti-PAD4 antibodies, particularly after activation of neutrophils by a number of stimuli40. These exposed PAD4 molecules are catalytically active and able to citrullinate extracellular substrates40. By immunofluorescence staining, exposed PAD4 resides in concentrated spots on the surface, perhaps representing vesicles opening to the extracellular milieu. This is compatible with sites of PAD4-NADPH oxidase associations and the production of ROS into the lumen of such vesicles or extracellularly in open vesicles.
A novel aspect of our findings is that strong PAD4 activation through a lethal influx of calcium, termed ‘lethal hypercitrullination’ by Konig and Andrade53, has a negative influence on pro-inflammatory and anti-bacterial functions. This may partly explain the use of pore-forming toxins by pathogens skilled in immune evasion, such as Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) of Staphylococcus aureus61. In fact, we have observed an intracellular citrullination response similar to that in Fig. 3 after treatment of neutrophils with Staphylococcus aureus (unpublished observation). Lethal hypercitrullination has also been suggested as a mechanism for induction of excessive citrullination in RA patients by the pore-forming activities of perforin or the membrane-attack complex of complement produced during natural killer cell- or cytotoxic T cell-mediated killing of neutrophils23. The relevance of this mechanism as a source of modified autoantigens in RA is supported by the detection of many of the same proteins in ionomycin- or perforin-treated neutrophils as in the synovial fluid of RA patients, exemplified by NCF1 and vimentin.
A conundrum in PAD biology is how an enzyme that requires millimolar levels of Ca2+ can be enzymatically active in intact cells, where resting Ca2+ concentrations are less than 150 nM and even the strongest receptor-mediated signaling events raise intracellular Ca2+ concentrations to no more than 500 nM. One possibility is that an associated protein lowers the requirement for Ca2+ and/or induces some of the same conformational adjustments to the active site as Ca2+ binding. However, it does not appear that NCF binding results in such activation. Rather, association appears to be stable only in the absence of PAD4 activity. The dissociation induced by selective small-molecule inhibitors suggests that the catalytic pocket of PAD4 is directly involved in NCF binding. As a result, these small-molecule inhibitors not only block the catalytic function of PAD4, but also disrupt binding of substrates, including proteins that utilize PAD4 as a scaffold rather than for its enzymatic activity. We therefore predict that such drugs will have a pharmacodynamic effect on processes, such as ROS production and bacterial killing even if these events may not require citrullination. In light of these data, the interpretation of the mode of action of PAD4 inhibitors in several experimental animal models may need to be reevaluated. The use of PAD4 inhibitors for the treatment of patients with RA62 may also need to consider such potentially suppressive effects on bacterial defense, which may also, conversely, contribute to therapeutic utility.
Methods
Isolation of human neutrophils
Study protocols involving human cells were approved by the MedImmune Institutional Review Board (protocol number: 2010-001 v6.0). Blood from healthy volunteers was obtained with informed consent under MedImmune’s blood donation program, and studies using human cells were performed in accordance with the Institutional Review Board guidelines. Neutrophils were isolated from heparin-anticoagulated blood on a discontinuous Ficoll gradient as previously described63.
HL60 PAD4 knockdown, over expression and differentiation
Two different lentiviral constructs containing shRNA to PAD4 were purchased from Sigma (TRCN0000437969 and TRCN0000051678). Virus was generated and concentrated using standard methods. HL60 cells were transduced with the lentivirus and selected in 1 µg/ml puromycin for 1 week.
The PAD4 open reading frame was cloned into the lentiviral backbone pCDH-EF1-T2aNeo (System Biosciences). Virus was generated and concentrated using standard methods. HL60 cells that contained the stably integrated PAD4 shRNA lentivirus TRCN0000437969 or TRCN0000051678, along with parental wildtype HL60 cells, were transduced with the lentivirus and selected in 1 mg/ml geneticin for 1 week.
HL60 cells were resuspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (w/L-glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum) at a density of 3 × 105 cells/ml. The differentiation agent used was 0.85% N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). Cells were allowed to grow and differentiate for 5 days before harvesting.
Reagents
Antibodies for detecting citrullinated histone H3 (R2 citrullination, Ab176843 and R2-8-17 citrullination, Ab5103), total histone H3 (Ab24834), NCF1, NCF2, and NCF4 were from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Antibodies for detecting PAD4 (MABE254) and citrullination (F95) were from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA). Antibodies for PAD IP were developed as previously described40. Recombinant human PAD2 and recombinant human PAD4 were generated in-house. Recombinant human histone H3, pan PAD inhibitor BB-Cl-amidine, and PAD4 inhibitor GSK484 were from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI). The cell fraction isolation kit was from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA). Protein G beads, DPI, ionomycin, PMA, Hoechst 33342, HRP-labeled anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG), and anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
Immunoprecipitation
Total neutrophil proteins were isolated with RIPA lysis buffer. The cytoplasmic fraction, and the cell membrane and membrane organelle fraction of neutrophils were isolated using a cell fraction isolation kit. IP was performed individually with PAD4, NCF1, NCF2, and NCF4 antibodies coupled to protein G beads according to manufacturer’s protocol. Tris-glycine buffer (pH 2.8) was used for elution.
Mass spectrometry analysis
Anti-PAD4 immunoprecipitate samples were incubated in 9 M urea, 40 mM ammonium bicarbonate and 5 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine for 1 hour followed by reduction at 45 °C for 15 min. Cooled samples were alkylated using 40 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 15 min. Subsequently samples were processed using 30 kDa Amicon filter (Millipore) according to “Filter Assisted Sample Preparation” (FASP) method64. Samples were digested using Promega 0.5 µg of lys-C/trypsin mixture at 37 °C for 12 hrs. Samples were then acidified using 0.1% TFA and desalted using Oasis HLB µElution Plate. Dried peptides were reconstituted in 100 µl of 100 mM triethyl ammonium bicarbonate and labeled using six-plex tandem mass tag (TMT) reagents according instructions provided in Thermo Scientific kit. Labeled peptides were combined and fractionated using Oasis HLB 10 mg elution Plate using 15, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 40 and 90 percent organic solution (acetonitrile in 10 mM triethyl ammonium bicarbonate). Dried labeled peptides were analyzed on a nanoflow electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometer (LC-MS analysis). LC-MS system comprised of an Orbitrap Fusion TribridTM mass spectrometer and Dionex Ultimate 3000 nanoRSLCTM. Nanoflow LC column was packed with ReproSil-PurTM 120 C18-AQ, 2.4 um particles. Solvent gradient consisted of 0.1% formic acid with increasing levels of acetonitrile concentration (up to 80% over a period of 120 minutes. The acquisition parameters used in data dependent acquisition (DDA) of the TMT labeled peptides include: MS resolution of 120 K, scan range of 400–1600, HCD MS/MS with collision energy 35, 30 K resolution. Precursor was isolated in 1.2 ± 0.345 m/z window with dynamic exclusion of 30 seconds intervals. Raw mass spectrometry data was processed using Proteome Discoverer 2.2 (PD) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) search engine Mascot (version 2.6) against recent Uniprot human protein database. Unfragmented precursor and TMT reporter ions were removed using PD nodes. Search parameters included 5 missed arginine or lysine sites, oxidation (M) and deamidation (N, Q and R) as variable modifications. Cysteine carbamidomethyl, peptide N-terminus and lysine residue modification with TMT tags were set as fixed modifications. The mass tolerances on precursor and fragment masses were set at 20 ppm and 0.06 Da, respectively. Peptides and proteins were filtered using False Discovery Rate (FDR, below 1%) of identification, which was calculated using Percolator node65 in PD. Peptide citrullination was manually confirmed by inspecting the MS/MS spectra for neutral loss of isocyanic acid (-43.0058 Da).
Neutrophil lysates from four different donors with and without ionomycin treatment were digested for mass spectrometry analysis using FASP protocol as explained above. Digested peptides were individually analyzed on Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer without labeling under same conditions except collision energy of 30 and m/z scan range 375–1575. Resulting raw data was searched using Maxquant software version 1.6.0.1666 with neutral loss annotation option enabled, especially to confirm the citrullination sites.
Western blot
Equivalent amounts of proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis on 4–12% sodium dodecyl sulfate gel and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. For immunoblots with the anti-citrullinated Histone H3 antibody (Ab5103), anti-citrullinated Histone H3 antibody (Ab176843), total Histone H3 (Ab24834), NCF1, NCF2, NCF4, anti-PAD2 (Ab16478), and anti-PAD4 (MABE254), the iBind (Invitrogen) system was used. F95 western blot detection of pan citrullination used methods described in an earlier paper52. HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and anti-rabbit IgG were used as secondary antibody before enhanced chemiluminescence detection. Gel quantification was performed with ImageJ.
Confocal microscopy
Neutrophils were plated in 96-well plates and incubated at 37 °C with media, BB-CL-amidine, GSK, or ionomycin/calcium for 15 min. PMA was then added and incubated for 15 min before the plate was moved onto ice. Cells were fixed and permeabilized using Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD BioSciences, San Jose, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. After washing, cells were incubated with anti-PAD4-AF488 and anti-gp91-phox-AF647 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX), or anti-PAD4-AF488 and anti-p47-phox-AF647 (Lifespan, Seattle, WA), or anti-gp91-phox-AF488 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX) and anti-p47-phox-AF647 APC for 30 min on ice in the dark. Cells were washed and seeded onto a slide using a cytospin centrifuge. ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was then applied to the seeded cells and mounted with a coverslip. Images were acquired on a Leica SP5 broadband confocal microscope using a 63 × x oil objective and analyzed with Imaris imaging software (Bitplane, Belfast, UK).
ROS production measurement
ROS production by NADPH oxidase was measured by cell oxygen consumption with Seahorse XF analyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) as previously described67. In brief, 96,000 cells were seeded in each well of the XF96 well plate in 160 µL of RPMI with glucose and 2 mM calcium. Cells were spun down at 200 × g for 1 min without a break, then equilibrated in a 37 °C incubator for 30 min. After equilibrium, the plate was loaded into an XF analyzer. Injection of buffer, ionomycin, BB-Cl-amidine, GSK484, DPI, and PMA was completed by XF analyzer. Real-time oxygen consumption rate was measured and recorded. All OCR traces were analyzed for each representative donor with 6–8 replicate wells. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Bacterial phagocytosis and killing assays
Human peripheral blood neutrophils were plated (200,000 cells/96 wells). Neutrophils were incubated with GSK484 (25 µM), BB-Cl-amidine (10 µM), ionomycin/calcium (1 µM/2 mM), DPI (10 µM) for 15 min before adding bacteria. S. aureus (SF8300, USA300 clinical isolate) was opsonized with 10% human serum for 30 min before the experiment. Cells were washed with antibiotic-free media and incubated with S. aureus (MOI-0.1). Bacterial killing was determined by enumerating bacterial colony-forming units (CFU) 1 h after starting the experiment by serial dilution of the entire contents of the well (cells and media). Percent killed was calculated by subtracting the number of recovered bacteria from the inocula and dividing that number by the inocula. To monitor phagocytosis, 30 min after addition of bacteria to the neutrophil plate, the media was replaced with RPMI containing gentamycin (300 µg/ml) and the plates were placed on ice to slow the killing of internalized bacteria. The plates were incubated for an additional 30 min, at which point the cells were washed in PBS, lysed with Triton X-100, and internalized bacterial CFU were enumerated by serial dilution.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). Paired t-test was used in statistical analysis.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank Martin Strain, Choon Pei Low, Denice Chan, Frances Neal, Caroline Colley, Lisa Vinall, and Katherine A. Vousden for antibody screening. Editorial support was provided by Jacquelyn K. Beals (funded by MedImmune).
Author Contributions
T.M., G.P.S. and Y.Z. generated ideas for this study and wrote the manuscript. Y.Z., L.A., N.M., L.C., T.S.C. and B.C. performed experiments and analyzed data. R.C. and S.H. were responsible for the generation, analysis and interpretation of mass spectrometry data. All authors reviewed the manuscript for content, provided suggestions, and approved the final manuscript.
Competing Interests
All authors are employees of MedImmune, AstraZeneca, except Y.Z., who is currently employed by AbbVie, and T.M., who was an employee of MedImmune before July 2016, but is now an academic researcher at the University of Washington. This study was sponsored by MedImmune, part of AstraZeneca.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Gary P. Sims and Tomas Mustelin contributed equally.
Contributor Information
Gary P. Sims, Email: simsg@medimmune.com
Tomas Mustelin, Email: tomas2@medicine.washington.edu.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-33385-z.
References
- 1.Amulic B, Cazalet C, Hayes GL, Metzler KD, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil function: from mechanisms to disease. Annu Rev. Immunol. 2012;30:459–489. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leiding, J. W. Neutrophil evolution and their diseases in humans. Front. Immunol. 28, 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01009 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Brinkmann V, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303:1532–1535. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fuchs TA, et al. Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Cell Biol. 2007;176:231–241. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200606027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sorensen OE, Borregaard N. Neutrophil extracellular traps - the dark side of neutrophils. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:1612–1620. doi: 10.1172/JCI84538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McDonald B, Urrutia R, Yipp BG, Jenne CN, Kubes P. Intravascular neutrophil extracellular traps capture bacteria from the bloodstream during sepsis. Cell. Host Microbe. 2012;12:324–333. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Papayannopoulos Venizelos. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2017;18(2):134–147. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Babior BM. NADPH oxidase: an update. Blood. 1999;93:1464–1476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Winterbourn CC, Kettle AJ, Hampton MB. Reactive Oxygen Species and Neutrophil Function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2016;85:765–792. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dupre-Crochet S, Erard M, Nubetae O. ROS production in phagocytes: why, when, and where? J. Leuk. Biol. 2013;94:657–670. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1012544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thomas DC. The phagocyte respiratory burst: historical perspectives and recent advances. Immunol. Letters. 2017;192:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yin C, Heit B. Armed for destruction: formation, function and trafficking of neutrophil granules. Cell. Tissue Res. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2731-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cowland JB, Borregaard N. Granulopoiesis and granules of human neutrophils. Immunol. Rev. 2016;273:11–28. doi: 10.1111/imr.12440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khandpur R, et al. NETs are a source of citrullinated autoantigens and stimulate inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5:178ra140. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Spengler J, et al. Release of active peptidyl arginine deiminases by neutrophils can explain production of extracellular citrullinated autoantigens in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:3135–3145. doi: 10.1002/art.39313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Corsiero E, Pratesi F, Prediletto E, Bombardieri M, Migliorini P. NETosis as source of autoantigens in rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2016;7:485. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kessenbrock K, et al. Netting neutrophils in autoimmune small-vessel vasculitis. Nat. Med. 2009;15:623–625. doi: 10.1038/nm.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Knight JS, Kaplan MJ. Lupus neutrophils: ‘NET’ gain in understanding lupus pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2012;24:441–450. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283546703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gupta S, Kaplan MJ. The role of neutrophils and NETosis in autoimmune and renal diseases. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2016;12:402–413. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thieblemont N, Wright HL, Edwards SW, Witko-Sarsat V. Human neutrophils in auto-immunity. Semin. Immunology. 2016;28:159–173. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hollingsworth JW, Siegel ER, Creasey WA. Granulocyte survival in synovial exudate of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory joint diseases. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1967;39:289–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Darrah E, Andrade F. Rheumatoid arthritis and citrullination. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2018;30:72–78. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Romero V, et al. Immune-mediated pore-forming pathways induce cellular hypercitrullination and generate citrullinated autoantigens in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5:209ra150. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tutturen AE, Fleckenstein B, de Souza GA. Assessing the citrullinome in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid with and without enrichment of citrullinated peptides. J. Proteome Res. 2014;13:2867–2873. doi: 10.1021/pr500030x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang F, et al. Identification of citrullinated peptides in the synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis using LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF. Clin. Rheumatol. 2016;35:2185–2194. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3247-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schellekens GA, de Jong BA, van den Hoogen FH, van de Putte LB, van Venrooij WJ. Citrulline is an essential constituent of antigenic determinants recognized by rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies. J. Clin. Invest. 1998;101:273–281. doi: 10.1172/JCI1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Levesque MC, Zhou Z, Moreland LW. Anti-CCP testing for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and the quest for improved sensitivity and predictive value. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2009;60:2211–2215. doi: 10.1002/art.24720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Vossenaar ER, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis specific anti-Sa antibodies target citrullinated vimentin. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2004;6:R142–150. doi: 10.1186/ar1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Suzuki A, et al. Functional haplotypes of PADI4, encoding citrullinating enzyme peptidylarginine deiminase 4, are associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 2003;34:395–402. doi: 10.1038/ng1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yamada R, Suzuki A, Chang X, Yamamoto K. Peptidylarginine deiminase type 4:identification of a rheumatoid arthritis-susceptible gene. Trends Mol. Med. 2003;9:503–508. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2003.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee YH, Bae SC. Association between susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis and PADI4 polymorphisms: a meta-analysis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2016;35:961–971. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-3098-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Takata Y, et al. Replication of reported genetic associations of PADI4, FCRL3, SLC22A4 and RUNX1 genes with rheumatoid arthritis: results of an independent Japanese population and evidence from meta-analysis of East Asian studies. J. Hum. Genet. 2008;53:163–173. doi: 10.1007/s10038-007-0232-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Plenge RM, et al. Replication of putative candidate-gene associations with rheumatoid arthritis in >4,000 samples from North America and Sweden: association of susceptibility with PTPN22, CTLA4, and PADI4. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005;77:1044–1060. doi: 10.1086/498651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chang X, et al. PADI2 is significantly associated with rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e81259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bicker KL, Thompson PR. The protein arginine deiminases: Structure, function, inhibition, and disease. Biopolymers. 2013;99:155–163. doi: 10.1002/bip.22127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vossenaar ER, Zendman AJ, van Venrooij WJ, Pruijn GJ. PAD, a growing family of citrullinating enzymes: genes, features and involvement in disease. Bio Essays. 2003;25:1106–1118. doi: 10.1002/bies.10357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Anzilotti C, Pratesi F, Tommasi C, Migliorini P. Peptidylarginine deiminase 4 and citrullination in health and disease. Autoimmunity reviews. 2010;9:158–160. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jones JE, Causey CP, Knuckley B, Slack-Noyes JL, Thompson PR. Protein arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4): Current understanding and future therapeutic potential. Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Dev. 2009;12:616–627. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Foulquier C, et al. Peptidyl arginine deiminase type 2 (PAD-2) and PAD-4 but not PAD-1, PAD-3, and PAD-6 are expressed in rheumatoid arthritis synovium in close association with tissue inflammation. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3541–3553. doi: 10.1002/art.22983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhou Y, et al. Spontaneous Secretion of the Citrullination Enzyme PAD2 and Cell Surface Exposure of PAD4 by Neutrophils. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1200. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nakashima K, Hagiwara T, Yamada M. Nuclear localization of peptidylarginine deiminase V and histone deimination in granulocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:49562–49568. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208795200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Neeli I, Khan SN, Radic M. Histone deimination as a response to inflammatory stimuli in neutrophils. J. Immunol. 2008;180:1895–1902. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Christophorou MA, et al. Citrullination regulates pluripotency and histone H1 binding to chromatin. Nature. 2014;507:104–108. doi: 10.1038/nature12942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang Y, et al. Human PAD4 regulates histone arginine methylation levels via demethylimination. Science. 2004;306:279–283. doi: 10.1126/science.1101400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang Y, et al. Histone hypercitrullination mediates chromatin decondensation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J. Cell Biol. 2009;184:205–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200806072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lewis HD, et al. Inhibition of PAD4 activity is sufficient to disrupt mouse and human NET formation. Nat. Chem. Bio.l. 2015;11:189–191. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yipp BG, et al. Infection-induced NETosis is a dynamic process involving neutrophil multitasking in vivo. Nat. Med. 2012;18:1386–1393. doi: 10.1038/nm.2847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kenny EF, et al. Diverse stimuli engage different neutrophil extracellular trap pathways. Elife. 2017;6:e24437. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Khan MA, Palaniyar N. Transcriptional firing helps to drive NETosis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41749. doi: 10.1038/srep41749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lee KH, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in autoimmune diseases: a comprehensive review. Autoimmun. Rev. 2017;16:1160–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sun B, et al. Citrullination of NF-κB p65 promotes its nuclear localization and TLR-induced expression of IL-1β and TNFα. Sci. Immunol. 2017;2:eaa|3062. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aal3062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhou Y, Di Pucchio T, Sims GP, Mittereder N, Mustelin T. Characterization of the Hypercitrullination Reaction in Human Neutrophils and Other Leukocytes. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:236451. doi: 10.1155/2015/236451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Konig MF, Andrade FA. Critical reappraisal of neutrophil extracellular traps and NETosis mimics based on differential requirements for protein citrullination. Front. Immunol. 2016;7:461. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Holmdahl R, Sareila O, Olsson LM, Backdahl L, Wing K. Ncf1 polymorphism reveals oxidative regulation of autoimmune chronic inflammation. Immunol. Rev. 2016;269:228–247. doi: 10.1111/imr.12378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhao J, et al. A missense variant in NCF1 is associated with susceptibility to multiple autoimmune diseases. Nat. Genet. 2017;49:433–437. doi: 10.1038/ng.3782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Olsson LM, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the NCF1 gene leading to reduced oxidative burst is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:1607–1613. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Campbell AM, Kashgarian M, Shlomchik MJ. NADPH oxidase inhibits the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4:157ra141. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jones JE, et al. Synthesis and screening of a haloacetamidine containing library to identify PAD4 selective inhibitors. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012;7:160–165. doi: 10.1021/cb200258q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kramer PA, Ravi S, Chacko B, Johnson MS, Darley-Usmar VM. A review of the mitochondrial and glycolytic metabolism in human platelets and leukocytes: implications for their use as bioenergetic biomarkers. Redox Biol. 2014;2:206–210. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hultqvist M, Olsson LM, Gelderman KA, Holmdahl R. The protective role of ROS in autoimmune disease. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Seilie ES, Bubeck Wardenburg J. Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxins: the interface of pathogen and host complexity. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2017;72:101–116. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lewis HD, Nacht M. iPAD or PADi-‘tablets’ with therapeutic disease potential? Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2016;33:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhou Y, et al. Multiple lupus-associated ITGAM variants alter Mac-1 functions on neutrophils. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:2907–2916. doi: 10.1002/art.38117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods. 2009;6:359–362. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Brosch M, Yu L, Hubbard T, Choudhary J. Accurate and sensitive peptide identification with Mascot Percolator. J. Proteome Res. 2009;8:3176–3181. doi: 10.1021/pr800982s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chacko BK, et al. Methods for defining distinct bioenergetic profiles in platelets, lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils, and the oxidative burst from human blood. Lab. Invest. 2013;93:690–700. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2013.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.