Effect of Endurance and Strength Training on the Slow Component of O₂ Kinetics in Elderly Humans

Abstract

We compared the effects of 8 weeks of high intensity, aerobic interval training (HIT) and isoinertial resistance training (IRT) on: (i) O₂ kinetics during heavy (HiEx) intensity exercise and; (ii) work economy during moderate (ModEx) intensity exercise in 12 healthy elderly men (69.3 ± 4.2 years). Breath-by-breath O₂ and muscle deoxygenation ([HHb] by means of NIRS) were measured in HiEx and ModEx at identical workloads before and after trainings. In HiEx, O₂ and HHb responses were modeled as tri-exponential and mono-exponential increasing functions, respectively. A two-way ANOVA for repeated measures analysis was made; Effect size (η²) was also evaluated. After HIT the amplitude and the time delay of the slow component of O₂ uptake (O_2sc) during HiEx were smaller (−32%; P = 0.045) and longer (+19.5%; P = 0.001), respectively. At Post IRT: (i) during ModEx, gain was lower (−5%; P = 0.050); (ii) during HiEx, τ₂ (+14.4%; P = 0.050), d₃ (+8.6%; P = 0.050), and τ₃ (+17.2%; P = 0.050) were longer than at Pre IRT. After HIT, the decrease of the O_2sc amplitude was likely induced by the beneficial effects of training on a more responsive O₂ delivery and consumption cascade leading to a better muscle metabolic stability. IRT training was able to increase exercise economy during ModEx and to reduce the amplitude and delay the onset of O_2sc during HiEx. These effects should be due to the reduction and the delayed recruitment of Type II muscle fibers. The better exercise economy and the delayed appearance of O_2sc induced by IRT suggests that strength training might be included in endurance training programs to improve exercise economy and resistance to fatigue in this population of old subjects.

Introduction

The kinetics of alveolar O₂ uptake (O_2A) upon the onset of constant work rate (CWR) exercise of moderate intensity (ModEx) is usually described by a double exponential model (Poole and Jones, 2012). The first, rapid component – phase I – is characterized by a short time constant and it is caused by the prompt increase of cardiac output at the beginning of exercise. The second component – phase II – is considered to be a reliable proxy of muscular O₂ uptake and is characterized by a time constant of about 20 s in young, healthy, and trained subjects (Poole and Jones, 2012).

During heavy intensity exercise (HiEx), i.e., above the lactic threshold (LT), the attainment of the steady state oxygen consumption (O_2ss) is delayed due to the presence of a slow increase of O₂(O_2sc) that starts about 150–200 s after the onset of exercise (Jones et al., 2011). Furthermore, if the exercise is performed in the very heavy domain (VHiEx), e.g., above the so called critical power, O_2ss cannot even be attained, since O₂ keeps increasing up to O_2max, a condition that heralds the interruption of exercise (Poole and Jones, 2012).

From the performance standpoint, O_2sc is important, as it is related to increased susceptibility to fatigue: O_2sc amplitude, e.g., is linearly related to the time to fatigue in obese adolescents (Salvadego et al., 2010).

There is compelling evidence that muscular mechanisms are largely responsible for O_2sc (Poole et al., 1991) and several data support the notion that the progressive recruitment of Type II muscle fibers during HiEx/VHiEx exercise is the main determinant of O_2sc (Poole and Jones, 2012). Type II fibers are characterized by a higher ATP cost of force production (Stienen et al., 1996) and by higher O₂ consumption for ATP synthesis (Willis and Jackman, 1994) than Type I fibers and it has been also demonstrated that O_2sc is more evident in humans with a higher percentage of Type II fibers (Barstow et al., 1996). Recent findings, however, have somehow challenged this view suggesting that the progressive recruitment of the less economic Type II fibers is not strictly necessary to induce O_2sc. Conversely, O_2sc may be caused by events occurring inside the recruited fibers (Zoladz et al., 2008).

In addition, it has been shown that O_2sc can be modulated by manipulations of O₂ delivery (Poole and Jones, 2012). Therefore, decreased O₂ availability may affect the O_2sc of individuals in whom local O₂ delivery during exercise is impaired (e.g., healthy aging) and a clear mismatch between O₂ delivery and consumption is present (Murias et al., 2010a,b).

The effects of physical training have been explored to disclose the mechanisms underpinning O_2sc (Jones et al., 2007). Endurance training improves the so-called metabolic stability, leading to a lower decrease in phosphocreatine concentration [PCr] and a diminished intramuscular acidosis during HiEx in connection with a less evident O_2sc (Poole and Jones, 2012). Since low levels of intramuscular [PCr] and of pH characterize HiEx/VHEx exercise (Jones et al., 2008, 2011), these results seem to suggest that the slow decrease in [PCr] and increase of [H⁺] occurring at these exercise intensities (Jones et al., 2008) are the main mechanistic determinants of O_2sc. In addition, endurance training improves metabolic hyperemic response and optimizes the matching between local O₂ delivery and utilization, especially in individuals with suboptimal vascular response, such as elderly subjects (Murias et al., 2010a,b). Therefore, the correlation between the indexes that describe amelioration of local peripheral perfusion and the attenuation of the amplitude of O_2sc might suggest a potential mechanistic link between O₂ delivery and O_2sc.

Also, strength training, by decreasing the number of motor units (MUs) recruited at the same work rate (WR), may theoretically attenuate O_2sc, as a smaller number of less economic Type II fibers would be recruited at the same WR. However, this hypothesis has been somehow disproved in young adults in whom isometric strength training failed to abate the amplitude of O_2sc (Zoladz et al., 2012). Yet, more effective strength training modalities applied to subjects with large muscular strength deficits may potentially elicit more evident and beneficial effects on O_2sc via this mechanism.

Finally, it has also been suggested that strength training may improve mechanical efficiency during ModEx (Beattie et al., 2014). From the practical standpoint, a greater exercise economy associated with the attenuation of O_2sc induced by strength training may ameliorate exercise capability in subjects characterized by a low exercise capacity.

Therefore, we studied in a group of healthy, moderately active elderly men the effect of high intensity interval training (HIT) and isoinertial strength training (IRT) on: (1) O₂ kinetics and muscular oxygenation of the exercising muscle by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) during cycling HiEx performed at the same absolute WR before and after training; (2) work economy during ModEx at the same absolute WR. In addition, (3) Muscle cross sectional area (CSA) and muscle volume (Vol) of the quadriceps; and (4) muscular strength were assessed. We analyzed these data to determine the effects and relative mechanisms induced by HIT and IRT on the entity of O_2sc.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Twelve moderately active Caucasian men (mean ± SD; 69.3 ± 4.2 years, range, 65–75; 77.8 ± 10.4 kg; height 1.72 ± 0.05 m) volunteered to participate in the study. A medical examination, to determine exclusion criteria, and a cycle-ergometer stress test, to exclude abnormal responses to intense exercise, were preliminarily performed. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (approval on June 18th, 2013) and designed in accordance with ethical standards, the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and national and international guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject before the study.

Experimental Design

A two-factor within-subject design (A × B × S) (Keppel and Wickens, 2004) was used in which each subject (factor, S) received all the combinations that originated by crossing the two factors A and B. One fixed factor (A) was training modality (levels: HIT and IRT); the second fixed factor (B) was time (levels: Pre and Post training). The subjects were evaluated immediately before (Pre HIT) and immediately after 8 weeks of HIT (Post HIT). Then, after 4 months of recovery during which the subjects were asked to keep the same habitual lifestyle (Figure 1), the subjects were evaluated again before (Pre IRT) and immediately after 8 weeks of IRT (Post IRT). Before the first data collections, a familiarization session was conducted.

FIGURE 1.

Schematic representation of the experimental design.

MRI scans for measuring muscle CSA and Vol were obtained before and after HIT and IRT.

Tests were performed in the morning on four consecutive days: the main anthropometrical data and O_{2 max} were measured on day 1; CWR ModEx and HiEx exercise tests were performed on days 2 and 3; MRI scans were obtained on day 4.

Training Protocols

• simple •

  High intensity interval training (HIT). The subjects trained three times a week for 8 weeks. Training consisted of seven 2-min bouts of cycling (915 E, Monark, Varberg, Sweden) at about 85–95% of individual O_{2 max} interspersed by 2 min of recovery at about 40% of O_{2 max}. Each series was preceded by 10 min of active warm-up.

• simple •

  Isoinertial resistance training (IRT). Resistance exercise was performed on a seated knee extension flywheel (4.2 kg) ergometer (YoYo Technology AB, Stockholm, Sweden) three times a week for 8 weeks. Each session consisted of four sets of seven maximal, coupled concentric extensions and eccentric flexions of the knee. The sets were interspersed by 3-min of rest and initiated immediately after performing two submaximal actions. Each exercise session was preceded by 10 min of active warm-up.

Anthropometry

Body weight (BW) and stature were measured with a Tanita electronic scale BWB-800 MA (Tanita, Arlington Heights, IL, United States) and a stadiometer (Holtain Ltd., Crymych, Pembs. United Kingdom).

Maximal Oxygen Uptake, Ventilatory Thresholds

All cycling tests were performed on an electromechanically braked cycle ergometer (Excalibur Sport, Lode, Netherlands) operated by a personal computer connected to a metabolic cart. Breath-by-breath gas exchanges were measured continuously at the mouth with a metabolic cart (Quark b², Cosmed, Rome, Italy) that was calibrated following the manufacturer’s instructions before each experiment.

O_{2 max} and ventilatory thresholds were measured during a ramp test (Poole et al., 2008) and a supra maximal CWR test following the procedure illustrated by Bruseghini et al. (2015).

Responses to Moderate Intensity and Heavy-Intensity Exercise

Responses to ModEx and HiEx exercise were evaluated at a WR corresponding to 90% of individual gas exchange threshold (GET) and to about 50% of the difference between GET and respiratory compensation point (RCP) determined at Pre HIT. The WR was calculated using the linear regression of O₂ vs. WR considering the lag of the O₂ increase with respect to that of the workload determined at the ramp test and it was maintained constant in all the sessions. After instrumentation and preparation, the subjects rested on the cycle ergometer for 3 min before starting to pedal for 3 min at 30 W; then, WR was increased to the preselected WR and maintained for 6 min. The procedure was repeated three times (twice for ModEx and once for HiEx) with 10 min of recovery between each test. The entire procedure was repeated the following day. Pedaling frequency was strictly maintained between 70 and 80 revolutions per minute by the aid of a visual pacemaker.

Muscle Oxygenation

Vastus lateralis muscle oxygenation during HiEx was evaluated by means of a frequency-domain-multidistance NIRS system (OxiplexTS, ISS, Champaign, IL, United States) that provided continuous measurement of absolute concentrations (μM) of oxyhemoglobin ([O₂Hb]) and deoxyhemoglobin ([HHb]) (De Roia et al., 2012). The thickness of the skin and of the subcutaneous fat layer of the explored area was assessed by ultrasound (ACUSON P50 ultrasound system, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and it ranged from 6.4 to 11.8 mm, 8.1 mm ± 1.5. In addition, cutaneous landmarks were pen-marked on a transparent acetate sheet placed on the area of the probe so that it could be applied on the same site in the subsequent experimental sessions.

Muscular Strength and Morphology

Knee extension torque (T_k) of the dominant limb was evaluated with an isokinetic dynamometer (CMSi Cybex Humac Norm Dynamometer, Stoughton, MA, United States) during concentric contractions at 60° s⁻¹ and 120° s⁻¹ angular speeds. The subjects went through several practice trials and performed contractions while seated on the reclining chair of the dynamometer. The lower part of the leg was strapped to the end of the lever arm and the center of rotation of the knee was aligned with the axis of the dynamometer. Before the test, the subjects completed 10-min of warm-up exercise on a stationary bike. Three maximal trials were performed for each condition with 3 min of recovery between each trial. The highest T_k values (as peak values) were recorded for further analysis.

MRI scans were obtained after 1 h of supine rest to avoid the influence of posture-related fluid shifts on muscle size following the procedure illustrated by Bruseghini et al. (2015).

Data Analysis

Breath-by-breath O₂ values were interpolated to 1 s intervals, time aligned with the onset of exercise transition, and treated by subtracting the O₂ steady state value (average values of the last 30 s of trial) at 30 W. The data from the trials were then combined to obtain a single data file for each subject and condition.

O₂ kinetics during HiEx exercise was modeled as a sum of three exponential increasing functions:

$$\begin{array}{l}\dot{V}{O}_2=U(t-d_1)\times (A_1\times (1-e^{-(t-d_1/{\tau }_1)}))+\hfill \\ U(t-d_2)\times (A_2\times (1-e^{-(t-d_2/{\tau }_2)}))+\hfill \\ U(t-d_3)\times (A_3\times (1-e^{-(t-d_3/{\tau }_3)}))\hfill \end{array}$$ (1)

where τ₁, τ₂, and τ₃ are the time constants of the exponential increases during phase I, phase II, and phase III (the slow component), d₁, d₂, and d₃ are the time delays and A₁, A₂, and A₃ are the asymptotic amplitudes of the corresponding phases. U (t − d) is the unit step function defined as:

$$U(t-d)\{\frac{0\mathit{if}t<d}{1\mathit{if}t\ge d}$$ (2)

The value of the amplitude at the end of phase I, (A′₁), which terminated at the start of phase II, was calculated as (2):

$${A^{\prime }}_1=A_1\times \left(1-e^{-(d_2/{\tau }_1)}\right)$$ (3)

Note that the first addend of Eq. (1) is truncated as it reaches A′₁ at t = d₂, and doesn’t continue to rise toward its asymptotic value A₁. The physiologically significant amplitude of the primary exponential (A′₂) was defined as the sum of A′₁ + A₂ (Barstow et al., 1996). Because of the uncertain validity of the asymptotic value of A₃, we used the value of the amplitude of the slow component at the end of the exercise (A′₃) (Barstow et al., 1996). The change of O₂ uptake from the O₂ steady state value at 30 W and the values of O₂ at A′₃ (ΔO₂EE) was given by A′₂ + A′₃. To compare the subjects working at different absolute workloads, the gain in the primary response (G_Prim = A′₂/ΔWR) and the gain in the total response at the end of HiEx exercise [G_Tot = (A′₂ + A′₃)/ΔWR] were calculated. The relative contribution of the slow component to the overall O₂ response was calculated as A′₃/(A′₂ + A′₃).

The gain (G) during ModEx exercise was calculated as the ratio between net steady state O₂ and the corresponding net increase of WR (G = A′₂/ΔWR).

NIRS derived [HHb] response during HiEx was first interpolated to 1-s intervals, then time aligned with the onset of exercise transition and finally treated by subtracting the steady state value at 30 W. Then, the fitting window was constrained from the start of exercise to the onset of the slow component of [HHb] (Breese et al., 2013). Mean response time (MRT) was calculated as the sum of τ₁ and d₁. The primary [HHb] amplitude was divided by the phase II asymptotic amplitude A₂ to yield the Δ[HHb]/ΔO₂: it was considered as an index of the increase in fractional muscle O₂ extraction required to sustain a given net increment in O₂ during the primary phase (Murias et al., 2014). The net increase from the baseline of the values of [HHb] and of [O₂Hb] after 120 s of exercise and at the end of the exercise were calculated over 30 s time windows, the first interval of time being centered on the 120th-second and second interval including the last 30 s of exercise.

The net increases in [HHb] and in [O₂Hb] were then added to obtain the net increase in total hemoglobin concentration ([Hb_tot]) in the volume of tissue explored by the probe. [Hb_tot] was only calculated at 120 s of exercise and at the end of exercise.

The parameters of the O₂ models were estimated by means of an iterative, weighted non-linear least-squares procedure (Marquardt, 1963) that was developed in G-Language (Lab-VIEW 7.0, National Instruments, Austin, TX, United States). Initial guesses of the parameters of the model were entered after visual inspection of the data. The 95% confidence intervals of the τ₂ and τ₃ of O₂ kinetics and of τ₁ of HHb kinetics were generated by means of Monte Carlo simulation (Motulsky and Christopoulos, 2004) using commercial software for data analysis (GraphPad Prism version 6.00 for Macintosh, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States). Amplitudes and time delays were constrained to the best-fit values and the time constants were allowed to vary.

MRI scans were transferred electronically from the scanner to a personal computer (Macintosh mac Book Pro, Apple, Cupertino, CA, United States) and analyzed with OsiriX (version 3.7.1 32 bit) by using manual planimetry to calculate CSA and Vol of the quadriceps of the dominant leg (Bruseghini et al., 2015). The same investigator carried out all measurements. The reliability of this measurement was assessed over five separate measurements of the CSA of three heads of the quadriceps muscle taken distally at 50% of the femur bone length; the average coefficient of variation of measuring the same image was 0.92% for total quadriceps femoris.

Statistical Analysis

All values in the text and the tables are presented as mean ± SD. Two-factor within-subject ANOVA analysis for repeated measures was carried out according to Keppel and Wickens (2004): (i) F values were calculated taking into account the possible violation of sphericity as suggested by Geisser and Greenhouse; (ii) single contrasts within subjects (time, Pre vs. Post) and between subjects (Training, HIT vs. IRT and interactions were computed; (iii) effect size was evaluated with partial squared correlation factor or η², (${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{w}}^2$, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{b}}^2$, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{inte}}^2$, suffix are related to within, between, and interactions analysis) which expresses the ratio between explained variability and total variability in the population, but compensates for the size of the other treatment effect (either time or training); (iv) effect size (d) of the differences between the contrasted values was calculated. Calculations were carried out using an Excel spreadsheet (MO 2010, Microsoft Corp., Seattle, WA, United States) prepared for this purpose. Model 2 linear regressions between bivariate data were calculated according to the method of Deming (Motulsky and Christopoulos, 2004). Correlation between variables was computed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient.

Statistical analysis was made by a two-way ANOVA for repeated measures; Effect size was evaluated with partial squared correlation factor or η². P was always set <0.05.

Results

The data concerning O_{2 max}, ventilatory threshold and muscular strength and mass have been already published in a paper that described the effects of HIT and IRT on several risk factors of cardiometabolic diseases and on the exercise capability in healthy elderly subjects (Bruseghini et al., 2015). The readers are kindly asked to refer to the indicated paper for further details. Here, only the essential results useful for supporting and discussing the hypothesis related to the present investigation will be summarized.

Briefly, absolute O_{2 max} increased only after HIT (Pre HIT 2.34 ± 0.35 Post HIT 2.48 ± 0.38 L min⁻¹ P = 0.015; d = 0.83; 95% CI_Diff: 0.04 L min⁻¹/0.22 L min⁻¹), with no differences after IRT (Pre IRT 2.43 ± 0.43 Post IRT 2.44 ± 0.42 L min⁻¹). O_2RCP, expressed as percent of O_{2 max}, was greater at Post HIT (P = 0.014; d = 0.85; 95% CI_Diff: 2.1%/11.1%) and at Pre IRT (P = 0.007; d = 0.96; 95% CI_Diff: 3.9%/16.2%) than at Pre HIT and it was greater at Post IRT than at Post HIT (P = 0.001; d = 1.24; 95% CI_Diff: 1.4%/3.8%). Post hoc contrast analysis showed that CSA and Vol were increased after HIT: Vol, Pre HIT: 820 ± 199 cm³, post HIT: 866 ± 199 cm²; P = 0.002; d = 1.17; 95% CI_Diff: 22.9 cm³/67.9 cm³) and after IRT Vol, Pre IRT: 813 ± 184 cm³, post IRT: 852 ± 188 cm²; P = 0.01; d = 0.90; 95% CI_Diff: 13.9 cm³/64.6 cm³). Finally, maximal isokinetic torque was increased only after IRT: T_k 60° s⁻¹, Pre HIT: 159.8 ± 24.5 N m, post HIT: 163.3 ± 22.2 N m; P = 0.360; d = 0.27; 95% CI_Diff: −3.9 N m/10.9 N m; T_k 60° s⁻¹, Pre IRT: 162.4 ± 25.8 N m, post IRT: 179.0 ± 31.1 N m; P = 0.001; d = 1.27; 95% CI_Diff: 9.0 N m/24.1 N m.

Response to ModEx

The average CWR was 72.5 ± 16.3 W in the ModEx condition, corresponding to 35–40% of O_{2 max}, i.e., <GET. G at Pre HIT and at Post HIT was not significantly different (12.1 mL min⁻¹ W⁻¹± 1.5 vs. 12.4 mL min⁻¹ W⁻¹± 1.0). Conversely, at Post IRT (12.0 mL min⁻¹ W⁻¹± 1.0) G turned out to be significantly smaller (P = 0.049; d = 0.63; 95% CI_Diff: −0.05 mL min⁻¹ W⁻¹/−1.1 mL min⁻¹ W⁻¹) than at Pre IRT (12.6 mL min⁻¹ W⁻¹± 0.9).

Response to HiEx

The average CWR was 144.3 ± 26.6 W in the HiEx condition and it corresponded approximately to 67–71% of O_{2 max}, i.e., >GET, but <RCP. The parameters describing the kinetics of O₂ and the NIRS signals obtained in the HiEx condition before and after HIT and IRT are presented in Tables 1, 2, respectively; Figures 2A–D demonstrates the kinetics of O₂ at the onset of HiEx after HIT and IRT in a typical subject, respectively. Figures 2E–H shows the kinetics of [HHb] after HIT and IRT, respectively.

Table 1.

Mean values (SD) of the parameters describing O₂ kinetics at the onset of CWR exercise of heavy (HiEx) intensity.

Parameter				Training
				HIT		IRT
	Pb; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{b}}^2$	Pw; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{w}}^2$	Pint; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{inter}}^2$	Pre	Post	Pre	Post
A’1 (L min−1)	0.061; 0.271	0.098; 0.233	0.248; 0.123	0.37 (0.15)	0.37 (0.20)	0.23∗ (0.18)	0.35‡ (0.10)
τ1 (s)	0.006; 0.508	0.051; 0.305	0.535; 0.036	2.1 (1.5)	3.9 (3.2)	1.0∗ (0.7)	2.0 (1.9)
d1 (s)	0.024; 0.341	0.213; 0.136	0.264; 0.112	1.3 (1.5)	2.3 (2.7)	0.5 (1.1)	0.5† (0.5)
A’2 (L min−1)	0.101; 0.227	0.025; 0.381	0.751; 0.009	1.45 (0.27)	1.53 (0.22)	1.51 (0.22)	1.58‡,(0.34)
τ2 (s)	0.227; 0.131	0.410; 0.063	0.013; 0.444	27.7 (7.0)	24.9 (4.3)	25.7 (3.7)	30.0‡,† (5.1)
95% IC τ2 (s)				26.1–29.4	23.9–25.9	24.2–27.1	27.9–30.9
d2 (s)	0.006; 0.508	0.249; 0.119	0.687; 0.015	17.7 (3.1)	19.3 (8.7)	12.1∗ (5.0)	14.9 (3.8)
A’3 (L min−1)	0.328; 0.088	0.019; 0.407	0.844; 0.004	0.19 (0.10)	0.13∗ (0.07)	0.21 (0.12)	0.16 (0.10)
τ3 (s)	0.003; 0.570	0.411; 0.062	0.127; 0.199	71.0 (8.5)	69.6 (18.4)	81.5 (16.7)	92.0† (15.6)
95% IC τ3 (s)				70.3–71.8	69.4–71.2	78.6–81.7	90.0–94.7
d3 (s)	0.851; 0.003	0.000; 0.742	0.047; 0.313	165.8 (10.1)	197.1∗ (13.6)	172.2 (43.2)	185.8‡ (42.6)
ΔO2EE (L min−1)	0.015; 0.433	0.398; 0.07	0.665; 0.018	1.62 (0.30)	1.67 (0.27)	1.72 (0.27)	1.74 (0.34)
A’3/(A’2 + A’3) (%)	0.329; 0.067	0.010; 0.471	0.706; 0.013	13.8 (7.5)	8.5∗ (3.8)	14.8 (9.5)	10.8 (6.6)
GPrim (mL min−1ΔW)	0.081; 0.251	0.040; 0.317	0.626; 0.012	10.1 (1.3)	10.7 (0.5)	10.5 (0.9)	10.9 (0.8)
GTot (mL min−1/W)	0.061; 0.292	0.637; 0.024	0.954; 0.000	11.5 (1.5)	11.6 (0.6)	12.3 (1.5)	12.4 (1.5)

The table reports also the mean of the 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles of the 95% confidence interval for τ₂ and the P-values of the ANOVA analysis together with the values of the corresponding partial squared correlation factors. For the meaning of the symbols, please refer to the text. ^∗Significantly different from Pre HIT; ^†significantly different from Post HIT; ^‡significantly different from Pre IRT.

Table 2.

Mean values (SD) of the parameters describing [HHb] kinetics at the onset of CWR exercise of heavy intensity (HiEx) together with the values of [HHb] and [Hb_tot] after 120 s of exercise and at the end of exercise.

Parameter				Training
				HIT		IRT
	Pb; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{b}}^2$	Pw; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{w}}^2$	Pint;${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{inter}}^2$	Pre	Post	Pre	Post
[Hbtot]120 (μM)	0.052; 0.300	0.814; 0.005	0.772; 0.008	4.5 (3.4)	3.8 (5.6)	6.8 (6.3)	7.0 (6.0)
[Hbtot]end (μM)	0.016; 0.425	0.888; 0.002	0.917; 0.504	4.3 (2.3)	4.3 (6.0)	9.5∗ (7.5)	9.1 (6.5)
[HHb]A1 (s)	0.051; 0.307	0.246; 0.122	0.995; 0.000	8.3 (4.9)	9.8 (6.8)	12.2 (8.0)	13.7 (9.9)
[HHb]d1 (s)	0.572; 0.029	0.966; 0.000	0.199; 0.144	5.9 (1.0)	6.7 (3.2)	6.4 (1.4)	5.7 (2.6)
[HHb]τ 1 (s)	0.132; 0.188	0.731; 0.011	0.324; 0.091	4.5 (1.1)	4.4 (0.9)	3.9 (1.2)	4.3 (1.0)
95% IC [HHb]τ 1 (s)				3.1–5.6	3.2–5.8	2.2–6.0	3.6–5.1
[HHb]MRT (s)	0.135; 0.191	0.821; 0.005	0.439; 0.055	10.4 (1.3)	11.1 (3.2)	10.3 (1.9)	10.0 (3.3)
[HHb]120 (μM)	0.091; 0.237	0.208; 0.140	0.627; 0.22	5.4 (3.2)	7.3 (6.3)	7.5 (4.6)	8.5 (5.9)
[HHb]end (μM)	0.042; 0.324	0.121; 0.204	0.590; 0.027	5.4 (3.0)	6.4 (4.9)	6.9 (4.1)	9.0 (6.1)
Δ[HHb]/ΔO2 (μM L−1 min−1)	0.078; 0.255	0.425; 0.060	0.922; 0.001	5.6 (3.1)	6.2 (3.7)	8.0 (5.3)	8.5 (6.2)

Δ[HHb]/ΔO₂ ratio is also reported. The table reports also the mean of the 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles of the 95% confidence interval for τ₁ and the P-values of the ANOVA analysis together with the values of the corresponding partial squared correlation factors. For the meaning of the symbols, please refer to the text. ^∗Significantly different from Pre HIT.

FIGURE 2.

Pulmonary O₂ and muscle HHb kinetics of typical subjects at the onset of constant work rate exercise of heavy intensity are represented. The first four panels show the following O₂ kinetics: Pre HIT (A), Post HIT (B), Pre IRT (C) and Post IRT (D). The last four panels show the muscle HHb kinetics: Pre HIT (E), Post HIT (F), Pre IRT (G) and Post IRT (H). Data are displayed on 1 s base and the residual plot is shown on x-axis.

The amplitude A′₁ of phase I at Post IRT was significantly larger than at Pre IRT (P = 0.018; d = 0.81; 95% CI_Diff: 0.03 L min⁻¹/0.20 L min⁻¹); the latter value was also significantly smaller than at Pre HIT (P = 0.029; d = 0.72; 95% CI_Diff: 0.03 L min⁻¹/0.24 L min⁻¹). The time delay in phase I at Post IRT was significantly shorter than at Post HIT (P = 0.036; d = 0.69; 95% CI_Diff: −0.3 s/−2.3 s) (Table 1).

A′₂ was greater at Post IRT than at Pre IRT (P = 0.028; d = 0.73; 95% CI_Diff: 0.01 L min⁻¹/0.12 L min⁻¹). The time constant of the primary phase of O₂ kinetics (τ₂) during HiEx was significantly longer at Post IRT than before strength training (P = 0.010; d = 0.90; 95% CI_Diff: 1.5 s/6.9 s) and after HIT (P = 0.010; d = 1.02; 95% CI_Diff: 2.2 s/7.9 s). In addition, a significant interaction between training types and time at τ₂ was noted (P = 0.010; d = 0.94; 95% CI_Diff: 2.6 s/13.2 s). This further suggests that IRT was specifically able to induce the deceleration of the primary phase of O₂ kinetics during HiEx. Finally, d₂ at Pre IRT was shorter than before HIT (P = 0.004; d = 1.04; 95% CI_Diff: −2.5 s/−8.8 s) (Table 1).

After HIT A′₃ was significantly smaller (P = 0.045; d = 0.65; 95% CI_Diff: −0.01 L min⁻¹/−0.11 L min⁻¹) and d₃ was larger (P = 0.001; d = 1.55; 95% CI_Diff: 19.6 s/43.1 s) than at Pre HIT (Table 1 and Figures 3A,B). The relative contribution of the slow component to the overall O₂ response [A′₃/(A′₂ + A′₃)] (Figure 3D) was significantly smaller at Post HIT than at Pre HIT (P = 0.018; d = 0.80; 95% CI_Diff: −1.4%/−9.2%). Also, IRT affected d₃ (Figure 3B), as it was longer at Post IRT than at Pre IRT (P = 0.039; d = 0.67; 95% CI_Diff: 2.0 s/25.3 s). In addition, a significant interaction between training types and time on d₃ was observed (P = 0.022; d = 0.87; 95% CI_Diff: 6.1 s/39.5 s), indicating that HIT induced a more marked effect than IRT on d₃ (Figure 3B). Finally, τ₃ was significantly greater at Post IRT than at Post HIT (P = 0.003; d = 1.107; 95% CI_Diff: 10.7 s/34.1 s) (Figure 3C).

FIGURE 3.

Box-whiskers graphs of the amplitude (A′₃) of the O₂ uptake at the end of exercise (A), time delay (B) and slow phase time constant (C) of the O_2sc and relative contribution of A′₃ to the overall O₂ response (D) at Pre HIT, Post HIT, Pre IRT, and Post IRT. Horizontal line marks the median of the data distribution, box extends from the 25th to the 75th percentiles; whiskers extend down to the 5th percentile and up to the 95th percentile; the cross represents the average. ^∗P < 0.05; ^∗∗P < 0.01.

Training did not affect the parameters describing the increase in HHb at the onset of HiEx exercise (Table 2): no changes in A₁, d₁, τ₁, and MRT were observed after either HIT or IRT as compared with the pre-training conditions.

Discussion

We investigated the effects of HIT and IRT on O₂ kinetics during CWR HiEx exercise performed at the same absolute WR before and after training in a group of healthy, moderately active elderly men.

Post-intervention assessment after 8 weeks of HIT mainly showed:

• simple (i)

  an increase in O_{2 max} and an improvement of RCP;

• simple (ii)

  an increase in Vol and CSA of the quadriceps without a parallel increment of muscular strength;

• simple (iii)

  a decrease in the amplitude A′₃ of the slow component of O₂ kinetics assessed during HiEx together with a prolonged d₃;

Post-intervention assessment after 8 weeks of IRT showed:

• simple (i)

  a decrease in the functional gain of the primary phase of O₂ kinetics during ModEx;

• simple (ii)

  an increase in muscular Vol and CSA in parallel with a significant increment in muscular strength;

• simple (iii)

  a deceleration in the primary component of O₂ kinetics with an increased τ₂ during HiEx;

• simple (iv)

  a significant increase of d₃ of O_2sc In addition, the longer τ₃ after IRT made the kinetics of O_2sc significantly slower than the one after HIT.

Maximal Oxygen Uptake and Gas Exchange Thresholds

Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of HIT in increasing O_{2 max} in different populations (Kohrt et al., 1991; Bruseghini et al., 2015). Our results are in line with the findings that 8–12 weeks of interval training can induce a significant increase in O_{2 max} in elderly subjects (Lepretre et al., 2009). HIT induced also a significant improvement in RCP. A comparable trend of the positive effects of HIT was found at intensities corresponding to the ventilatory threshold in elderly subjects (Pogliaghi et al., 2006).

Muscle Morphology and Strength

The increases of CSA (plus 4.3% ± 3.6) and Vol (plus 5.6% ± 3.6) found after HIT are in agreement with previous findings (Sillanpää et al., 2008; Harber et al., 2012) that showed a significant increase (+6%) of the quadriceps muscle volume in elderly men after 12 weeks of aerobic training paralleled by the increase of CSA of myosin heavy chain type I (MHCI) fibers and a higher muscular thickness of vastus lateralis and intermedius after endurance training in older adults. IRT was followed by significant increases of CSA and Vol (plus 4.2% ± 4.4 and plus 4.9% ± 7.0). This confirms the results obtained in untrained elderly subjects in other occasions (Lee et al., 2008; Shunkert et al., 2008).

IRT was paralleled by a significant increase in the torque produced by the limb extensors. Therefore, we may also reasonably assume that, at Post IRT, our subjects were able to pedal at the same WR recruiting a smaller number of MUs. Indeed, from the individual WR and the isokinetic torque values we can calculate that the average torque maintained by the subject during HiEx exercise, when expressed as a percent of T_k, significantly decreased from Pre IRT to Post IRT: P = 0.008, CI of the difference 1.3/−0.5 N m for T_k 60° s⁻¹; P = 0.012, CI of the difference 1.3/−0.25 N m for T_k 120° s⁻¹.

Response to CWR of Moderate Intensity Exercise

The significant decrease in G after IRT reflected a decrease in the O₂ cost of exercise and translated into a small, albeit significant, increase of 5% in work efficiency, η (Pre IRT η 22.9% vs. Post IRT η 24.0%; P = 0.041; 95% CI_Diff: 0.1%/2.0%). This is consistent with previous findings of a significant decrease in the amplitude of the primary phase in cycling (Zoladz et al., 2012) after strength training. Accordingly, strength training results in an improved delta η (Bastiaans et al., 2001) and work η (Sunde et al., 2010) in cycling. The improvement in η found after IRT remains difficult to explain, though. One may surmise that, by increasing the absolute strength of the muscles involved in cycling, the subjects were pedaling against the same workload recruiting a smaller number of less efficient Type II fibers, wherefrom a smaller G and a larger η derived.

Response to CWR During Heavy-Intensity Exercise

Endurance training is followed by a substantial reduction of O_2sc (Casaburi et al., 1987; Womack et al., 1995). In addition, the contribution of O_2sc to the overall O₂ response has been related to the % of Type I fibers, which have been described to have a greater metabolic stability (Hochacka and McClelland, 1997). Therefore, an increase of the % of Type I fibers at Post HIT may have led to improved metabolic stability (Zoladz et al., 2006), attenuated the drop in intramuscular pH and [PCr] and decreased O_2sc (Jones et al., 2007).

In addition to these mechanisms directly linked to the plausible phenotypical shift in muscle fiber populations, also mechanisms intrinsic to each single fiber may be responsible for the observed decrease of O_2sc after HIT. A recent study (Zoladz et al., 2016) showed that endurance training in rats induced a temperature dependent enhancement of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and a significant drop of mitochondrial uncoupling. Therefore, the decrease of O₂ cost for oxidative ATP production in each recruited muscle fiber may have substantially potentiated the effect of endurance training on O_2sc.

It has been also shown that O_2sc is modulated by manipulations of O₂ delivery (Poole and Jones, 2012). HIT may improve O₂ availability and induce a better matching between O₂ delivery and utilization (Murias et al., 2010a,b). This may have a positive impact on O_2sc in the elderly in whom metabolic vasodilatation is impaired (Poole et al., 2003) and a mismatch of local O₂ delivery to O₂ muscular consumption is present (Murias et al., 2010a,b). However, the obtained results do not support this conclusion, as training did not modify any of the indexes that characterize HHb response during HiEx exercise. In particular, the primary time constant [HHb]_τ1 was not affected: a constant τ₁ would suggest a proportionally similar increase of the speeds of adjustment of local O₂ delivery and muscular O₂ uptake in the primary phase of O₂ kinetics during HiEx. This conclusion is somehow strengthened by the observation that [HHb]_end was not modified in presence of a lower A′₃ of O₂ uptake response.

The primary phase of τ₂ of O₂ kinetics during HiEx was decelerated after IRT. In analogy with ModEx, the primary component in HiEx exercise is thought to increase exponentially without other changes (Poole and Jones, 2012). However, because the statistical estimate of τ₂ during HiEx is often based on a limited number of data, this unavoidable drawback may produce uncertain and unreliable values of τ₂. Besides these methodological problems, specific physiological adaptations induced by IRT may have contributed to the increase of τ₂. A constant [HHb]_τ helps us infer that local O₂ delivery response and muscular O₂ utilization changed proportionally after training. Therefore, a substantial defect in O₂ availability may be still present after IRT.

The changes induced by IRT on O_2sc are somehow ambiguous: the amplitude of O_2sc, either in absolute or relative terms, turned out to be unaffected by IRT, but O_2sc appeared later and developed more slowly than at Post HIT.

The mechanism underpinning the delay in the appearance of O_2sc after HIT and IRT are of different origin. We first underline that IRT training was effective in increasing the strength of muscles involved in pedaling (see the section “Results”). Therefore, we can suggest that the pedaling subjects after IRT were utilizing a lower percentage of their maximal voluntary force at the same WR and that they were recruiting a smaller number of Type II MUs. Should this be true, the diminished recruitment of these MUs would result in a slower development of O_2sc, as the utilized Type I muscle fibers are less liable to develop fatigue and their metabolic features make them less prone to cause O_2sc. However, this explanation does not clarify whether the main cause of O_2sc resides in intensive mechanisms, i.e., the progressive decay of the efficiency of the already recruited MUs, or, rather, it may be ascribed to an extensive process, i.e., the progressive recruitment of less efficient Type II fibers. It is worth noting, however, that the net decrease of d₃ observed after IRT was positively correlated with the net increase of knee torque (P = 0.046, r = 0.60). Conversely, the two variables were not correlated in the case of HIT (P = 0.316, r = −0.32).

Also, after IRT, we were not able to find any significant changes of muscular oxygenation and of the indexes that describe amelioration of local peripheral perfusion. This might suggest that the impairment of local O₂ delivery was not the main cause of O_2sc, at least in this specific population of subjects.

Points of Strength and Weakness of the Study

We compared for the first time the effects of HIT and of IRT on the dynamic response of pulmonary O₂ and muscular oxygenation during HiEx exercise in healthy, untrained elderly men.

However, a few methodological limitations should be mentioned. The experimental design was not counterbalanced for reasons of feasibility.

We did not evaluate the changes in muscle fiber expression during the two training interventions. Since the size of O_2sc has been positively related to the percentage of Type II fibers (Poole and Jones, 2012), a strong correlation between the observed changes in the slow component and the changes in the phenotypical expression of the trained muscles would have strengthened the hypothesis of a muscular origin of the slow component.

We did not evaluate the possible changes in neuromuscular activation induced by the two training modalities during ModEx and HiEx. Comparison of the differences in recruitment patterns would have helped to strengthen or reject our working hypothesis on the role of Type II motor units involvement in the genesis of O_2sc after IRT.

HHb signal mainly reflects the fractional O₂ extraction of the interrogated zone of the muscle resulting from the dynamic balance between muscular O₂ uptake and local O₂ delivery and HHb signal reflects changes in oxygenation mainly in the capillaries of the explored muscle volume (Grassi and Quaresima, 2016). However, the assessment of HHb obtained only from the surface of the vastus lateralis may be a substantial limitation to our analysis, since some spatial heterogeneity in terms of muscle oxygenation in an exercising muscle seems to exist (Koga et al., 2007). Nonetheless, using skin landmarks to accurately place the NIRS probe in the same site before all experiments minimized possible problems due to spatial inhomogeneity.

Finally, the study aimed to investigate the effects of training in a particular population of subjects, i.e., elderly healthy volunteers who may have larger strength deficits than young, active adults. Therefore, the meaning and the applicability of the results obtained in this study may be extended with some caution to other classes of subjects.

Conclusion

The amplitude of O_2sc during HiEx was substantially smaller after HIT than before, but its decrease was not correlated with an improvement in the O₂ delivery-to-utilization ratio of the exercising muscles. This suggests that suboptimal local O₂ delivery was not a possible factor contributing to O_2sc in the elderly, whereas the improved metabolic stability induced by HIT was likely able to induce beneficial effect on O_2sc.

IRT, by increasing muscle strength, resulted in a delayed appearance of O_2sc during HiEx because of a possible larger contribution of Type I fibers to a motor task of identical absolute intensity.

Perspectives

The results obtained in the present investigation may have practical applications. First, the association between a larger exercise economy and the delayed appearance of O_2sc found after IRT may be of interest, as it suggests that strength training should be included in the usual training programs of elderly people to improve exercise economy and resistance to fatigue (Beattie et al., 2014). Second, they prompt the investigators to better characterize the changes in neuromuscular activation and MUs recruitment induced by the two training modalities during HiEx performed at the same WR. This should be done in parallel with the invasive evaluation of the changes in muscle fiber expression induced by training interventions.

Author Contributions

CC, PB, ET, FS, and EC planned the study. CC, ET, PB, EO, AP, RPM, SP, and EC collected and analyzed the data. CC, PB, and ET wrote the manuscript. CC, PB, ET, EC, and RPM revised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.