Abstract
Background and Purpose:
We aimed to determine whether subjects aged ≤70 years who were treated with intravenous glyburide (RP-1127; BIIB093; glibenclamide) would have better long-term outcomes than those who received placebo.
Methods:
Glyburide Advantage in Malignant Edema and Stroke-Remedy Pharmaceuticals was a prospective double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. There were 86 participants, aged 18-80 years, who presented to 18 centers with large hemispheric infarction (baseline diffusion weighted imaging volumes, 82-300 cm3) randomized within 10 hours of symptom onset were enrolled. In the current exploratory analysis, we included participants aged ≤70 years treated with intravenous glyburide (n=35) or placebo (n=30) who met per-protocol criteria. Intravenous glyburide or placebo was administered in a 1:1 ratio. We analyzed 90-day and 12-month mortality, functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale; Barthel Index) and quality of life (EuroQol Group 5-Dimension). Additional outcomes assessed included blood-brain barrier injury (matrix metalloproteinase-9) and cerebral edema (brain midline shift).
Results:
Participants ≤70 years old treated with intravenous glyburide had lower mortality at all time points (log rank for survival hazards ratio 0.34; P=.04). After adjustment for age, the difference in functional outcome (mRS) demonstrated a trend towards benefit for intravenous glyburide-treated subjects at 90 days (odds ratio 2.31; P=.07)). Repeated measures analysis at 90 days, 6 months and 12 months using generalized estimating equations showed a significant treatment effect of intravenous glyburide on the Barthel Index (P=.03) and EuroQol Group 5-Dimension (P=.05). Participants treated with intravenous glyburide had lower plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (189 vs. 376 ng/ml; P<0.001) and decreased midline shift (4.7 vs. 9 mm; P<.001) compared to participants who received placebo.
Conclusions:
In this exploratory analysis, participants ≤70 years with large hemispheric infarction have improved survival following acute therapy with intravenous glyburide.
Keywords: Malignant stroke, ischemic stroke, brain edema, glyburide, acute treatment, acute stroke, large hemispheric infarction
Introduction
Large hemispheric infarction (LHI) is a distinct form of arterial ischemic stroke characterized by marked tissue swelling that is often associated with herniation, death, or poor neurological outcome.1,2 Cerebral edema that occurs within the rigid cranial vault increases intracranial pressure, causing additional brain damage, and in many instances, herniation and death. Current medical therapies for acute stroke and edema include head-of-bed elevation, osmotic therapy, sedation, and supportive care, but clinical trial evidence for these strategies is limited.2–4 In LHI, outcomes in patients ≤60 years may be improved with decompressive craniectomy,1,2 an invasive procedure with nontrivial complications.5
Emerging studies have implicated the SUR1-TRPM4 channel as a mediator of edema formation and as a potential therapeutic target.6 Channel blockade in multiple preclinical models of stroke has demonstrated edema reduction and improved survival and neurological outcome.7 Ongoing efforts are evaluating whether this pathway may be a suitable therapeutic target in human stroke.8
Brain atrophy increases with age, particularly in individuals over 70 years of age.9 Age-related cerebral atrophy in older patients may protect against space-occupying brain edema by providing room to compensate for the increase in volume.10 Several prior studies of LHI in adults have identified decreased age as a predictor of poor outcome.11–13 In addition, observational evidence suggests that patients over 70 years of age have an increased frequency of withdrawal of care, especially in brain injuries where the initial insult is a major predictor of outcome.14,15 Therefore, subjects ≤ 70 years may be the most appropriate target population to test an intervention that reduces cerebral edema.
GAMES-RP was a randomized trial of IV glyburide versus placebo in patients aged 18-80 years at high risk for malignant cerebral edema which found no difference in the primary outcome (composite outcome of decompressive craniectomy and functional outcome). However, there was decreased midline shift in IV glyburide treated subjects, and the results suggested a potential survival benefit for patients treated with glyburide.8 Here, we report an exploratory analysis of GAMES-RP in subjects ≤70 years age, in which we evaluated whether treatment with IV glyburide would reduce midline shift and decrease mortality. In addition to assessing 90-day outcomes in these subjects, we also evaluated their mortality, functional outcomes, disability and quality of life at one year.
Methods
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Study design and subjects
GAMES-RP was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of IV glyburide in subjects with anterior circulation LHI (baseline diffusion-weighted imaging volume of 82-300 cm3). The study enrolled patients aged 18-80 years from 18 centers in the United States who received study drug or placebo within 10 hours of symptom onset.8 The study methods and patient eligibility criteria have been reported.16 The study was approved by the institutional review boards at all participating centers. All participants or their legally authorized representatives provided written informed consent at enrollment. In this subgroup analysis, we included only subjects who were ≤70 years of age and who met per-protocol criteria. Key per-protocol criteria included administration of study drug or placebo and core lab verification of baseline infarction volume within the pre-specified range (82-300 cm3).
Outcome measurements
In the current subgroup analysis, we evaluated (1) functional outcome, measured with the mRS including mortality,11–13,17,18 (2) activities of daily living, measured by the Barthel index, 19,20 and (3) health-related quality of life (HRQOL), evaluated with the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension (EQ-5D).21,22 Outcomes were assessed at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months. The EQ-5D utility score measures five domains of general health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and integrates the ratings into a single score, calculated using population-based preference weights for each subscale. In the present analysis, we used the weights obtained from the US population.23,24 Utility scores express HRQOL quantitatively as a fraction of perfect health, with a score of 1 representing perfect health and a score of 0 representing death. Outcomes were assessed either in person or by telephone by qualified raters blinded to treatment allocation. Additional outcomes included midline shift (MLS) and plasma concentration of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9). MLS was measured by the blinded central imaging core on the day-4 MRI. The midline was defined as the anatomical line anchored by the falx cerebri to the skull. MLS was drawn perpendicular at the point of maximum distention, at the level of the septum pellucidum.8 Total MMP-9 plasma concentration during study drug infusion at 24–72 hours (mean level of three daily samples) was measured with a commercially available assay (Human MMP-9 Quantikine ELISA, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Statistical Analyses
All analyses were performed on the per-protocol sample, which included participants who had a centrally read DWI baseline lesion volume between 82 and 300 cm3 and who received any amount of the study drug or placebo. R (version 3.1.2) was used for all statistical analyses. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Normally distributed continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations and were compared with t-tests and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the mean. Non-normally distributed variables were summarized with medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs), and distributions were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Shift analysis of the raw mRS scores at 90 days and 12 months were compared using the Mann Whitney U test; effect sizes of the shift (common odds ratio and its 95% CI) were estimated using ordinal logistic regression. Multivariable analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with unstructured correlation matrix and robust jackknife variance estimate was used to evaluate the effect of IV glyburide on longitudinal clinical outcomes (Barthel index, EQ5D) at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months.25 Missing values due to death on the Barthel index were imputed using the worst score for each group. For subjects lost to follow-up or missing a 12 month mRS, the last observed mRS value (90 days or 6 months) was carried forward. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival. A Cox proportional hazards model compared survival between those who received study drug versus placebo. The ordinal logistic regression, GEE, and Cox regression were adjusted for age (60 years or under vs. 61-70 years) to account for any potential imbalance in this major prognostic variable. All p-values are reported as two-sided. Because of the exploratory nature of this analysis, statistical significance was set at 0.05, unadjusted for multiple comparisons. A statistical trend was noted if the p-value was between 0.05 and 0.10.
Results
Subject characteristics
Of the 86 subjects randomized in GAMES-RP, 77 were included in the per-protocol analysis.8 Of these, 65 subjects were 70 years or younger; 35 of these subjects were randomly allocated to IV glyburide and 30 to placebo. For this subgroup, the mean age was lower in the IV glyburide group when compared to placebo (55 ± 9 years vs. 60 ± 7 years; P=.02, t-test). We performed an age-by-treatment interaction analysis for functional outcome (p=0.19), and indeed, in the age 71-80 group, the the common odds ratio (COR) pointe estimate was 0.67 (favoring placebo), but was 2.49 in the under 70 group. None of the other baseline characteristics differed significantly between the two treatment groups (Table 1). Two subjects were lost to follow-up after 90 days. There was no significant difference in the use of decompressive craniectomy between the two groups (37% in IV glyburide group vs. 27% in placebo group; P=.43).
Table 1:
Demographics and baseline characteristics in GAMES-RP subjects aged 70 years or under. Data are mean (SD), mean (range), n (%), and median (IQR). SD= standard deviation; IQR = interquartile range; NIHSS= National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; DWI= diffusion weighted imaging; rtPA= alteplase
| IV glyburide (n=35) | Placebo (n=30) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Age, years (SD) | 55 (9) | 60 (7) | 0.017 |
| Ethnicity | |||
| Hispanic | 2 (6%) | 3 (10%) | 0.65 |
| Non-Hispanic | 33 (94%) | 27 (90%) | |
| Race | |||
| White | 30 (86%) | 26 (87%) | 1 |
| Black | 3 (9%) | 2 (7%) | |
| Asian | 2 (6%) | 2 (7%) | |
| Stroke characteristics | |||
| Cause of stroke | 0.11 | ||
| Large artery atherosclerosis | 10 (29%) | 7 (23%) | |
| Cardio-aortic embolism | 11 (31%) | 16 (53%) | |
| Other | 3 (9%) | 4 (13%) | |
| Unknown | 11 (31%) | 3 (10%) | |
| Internal carotid artery occlusion | 12 (34%) | 11 (37%) | 1 |
| Left sided infarction | 18 (51%) | 17 (57%) | 0.80 |
| Baseline NIHSS score | 19 (16 - 22) | 21 (16 - 23) | 0.24 |
| Baseline DWI, cm3 | 164 (52) | 167 (50) | 0.83 |
| Baseline blood glucose, mg/dL | 120 (104 - 156) | 123 (108 - 139) | 1 |
| Treatment | |||
| Intravenous rtPA | 21 (60%) | 19 (63%) | 0.80 |
| Time intervals | |||
| Time to rtPA, hours | 2.1 (1.0) | 2.3 (1.1) | 0.63 |
| Time to MRI, hours | 6.0 (1.7) | 5.8 (1.7) | 0.72 |
| Time to study drug, hours | 8.7 (1.3) | 9.0 (1.3) | 0.35 |
Mortality, midline shift and MMP-9 levels
All-cause mortality at one year was 5/35 (14%) in the IV glyburide group and 12/30 (40%) in the placebo group. The Kaplan-Meier curve presented in Figure 1 demonstrates that more deaths occurred in the placebo group within 30 days and that this group difference was sustained throughout the 12-month follow-up period. After adjusting for age, the hazard ratio was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.96; P= .04; Figure 1). The median midline shift at the level of the septum pellucidum at 72–96 hours was 4.7 mm in the IV glyburide group vs. 9.0 mm in the placebo group (P=.001, t-test). Patients treated with IV glyburide had significantly lower concentrations of total MMP-9 compared to those treated with placebo (mean 189 ng/mL vs. 367 ng/mL; P=.001; t-test)
Figure 1:
Kaplan-Meier survival curve for each treatment group.
Functional Outcomes
In an unadjusted analysis, functional outcome at 90 days was better among subjects who received intravenous glyburide compared to those who received placebo (common OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.02-6; P=.05; Figure 2). There was a slight reduction in the effect size over 12 months (common OR 2.24; 95% CI, 0.92-5.46; P=.08). Although not statistically significant after adjusting for age group, the shift in the modified Rankin scale still favored IV glyburide at 90 days (adjusted common OR 2.31; 95% CI, 0.93 to 5.72; P=.07) and 12 months (adjusted common OR 2.11; 95% CI, 0.86 to 5.18; P=.10).
Figure 2:
Functional outcomes on Modified Rankin Scale at 90 days (A) and 12 months (B) in subjects aged 70 years or under.
An additional analysis among participants who did not undergo DC showed a point estimate of the common odds ratio was 2.84 (p-value of 0.063).
Subjects treated with IV glyburide had higher scores on the Barthel index and EQ-5D at all time points when compared to patients who received placebo (Table 2). Repeated measures analysis at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months showed a significant treatment effect of IV glyburide on Barthel index (95% CI 2.1 - 37; P=.03) and EQ-5D (95% CI 0.001 – 0.249; P=.05) after adjusting for age. Because of the possibility that long-term outcomes were driven by an early difference in mortality between groups, we performed an additional analysis on survivors which did not show a difference between groups (Table 3). Figure 3 illustrates the time trend in treatment effect for both outcome variables (Barthel index and EQ-5D).
Table 2:
Patient outcomes. Data are n (%) and mean (SD). EQ-5D= EuroQol Group 5-Dimension.
| Outcome | Placebo n=30 | IV glyburide n=35 | Effect size (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality (%) | ||||
| 90 days | 10 (33%) | 4 (11%) | ||
| 6 months | 11 (37%) | 5 (14%) | ||
| 12 months | 12 (40%) | 5 (14%) | HR 0.34 (0.12 – 0.96) | 0.042* |
|
Barthel Index mean (SD) |
||||
| 90 days | 34.5 (36.5) | 50.7 (36.4) | ||
| 6 months | 39.5 (39.3) | 54.4 (37.3) | ||
| 12 months | 39.5 (40.1) | 60.1(37.9) | 20 (2.1 – 37) | 0.029† |
|
EQ-5D mean (SD) |
||||
| 90 days | 0.29 (0.30) | 0.43 (0.32) | ||
| 6 months | 0.33 (0.34) | 0.49 (0.32) | ||
| 12 months | 0.33 (0.32) | 0.49 (0.31) | 0.154 (0.001 – 0.249) | 0.048† |
denotes p-value is from a log-rank test;
p-value is from a linear, repeated measures GEE model for longitudinal outcomes.
Table 3.
Barthel Index for survivors (after exclusion of subjects who had died). Imputation with 0 for death has not been applied. SD = standard deviation.
| BARTHEL INDEX | |||||
| Interval | Placebo | Intravenous Glyburide | P | ||
| N | Mean (SD) | N | Mean (SD) | ||
| 90 days | 20 | 52 (33) | 31 | 57 (33) | .57* |
| 6 months | 18 | 66 (29) | 30 | 64 (32) | .82* |
| 12 months | 17 | 69 (27) | 29 | 71 (31) | .87* |
| Longitudinal GEE | Effect size (95% CI): IV Glyburide - Placebo | ||||
| 4.1 (−13 to 22) | .64 | ||||
| EQ5D | |||||
| Interval | Placebo | IV Glyburide | P | ||
| N | Mean (SD) | N | Mean (SD) | ||
| 90 days | 19 | 0.44 (0.26) | 30 | 0.49 (0.29) | .54* |
| 6 months | 18 | 0.54 (0.29) | 29 | 0.58 (0.26) | .66* |
| 12 months | 17 | 0.57 (0.22) | 29 | 0.57 (0.26) | .92* |
| Longitudinal GEE | Effect size (95% CI): IV Glyburide - Placebo | ||||
| 0.024 (−0.12 to 0.16) | .74† | ||||
denotes p-value from a t-test for each interval;
p-value is from Wald test for GEE with adjustment for age. EQ5D for survivors (after exclusion of subjects who had died). Imputation with 0 for death has not been applied. SD = standard deviation.
Figure 3:
Barthel index (A) and EQ-5D (B) at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months. Vertical bars represent mean +/− standard error.
Discussion
We present the results of an exploratory analysis of 12-month outcomes in subjects from the GAMES-RP study who were aged ≤ 70 years. Though the age-treatment interaction did not reach significance (p=0.19), participants in the subgroup who received IV glyburide had improved survival compared to those who received placebo. While the primary efficacy analysis from GAMES-RP8 did not meet the pre-specified efficacy endpoint, these data suggest that patients ≤ 70 years, who may be at higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes from cerebral edema, may benefit from therapy that inhibits edema formation.
The basis for the selection of age 70 as the cut point for this analysis rests on a biological and clinical premise directly relevant to edema prevention trials. In large prospective, population-based cohorts, brain atrophy is known to increase above the age of 70.9 Moreover, longitudinal studies using high-resolution MRI have demonstrated an age-related decrease in total brain volume that appears to accelerate after age 70.26–28 In patients with LHI, decreasing age is also a known predictor of the inability to tolerate the consequences of swelling.29 Furthermore, Lee at al. demonstrated that cerebral atrophy above a certain threshold [inter-caudate distance (ICD) >20mm] had an independent protective effect against brain herniation and the need for decompressive craniectomy, while simultaneously predicting poor functional outcome.10,30 In addition, a recent study by Goto et al. showed that elderly subjects with LHI required significantly larger infarct volumes to develop malignant edema and decreased level of consciousness when compared to subjects with lower age.31 Inclusion of brain atrophy as a marker of protective effect, in addition to the use of lesion volume as a prognostic factor, has led to more accurate prediction of a malignant course after LHI.30 We measured baseline hemisphere volume in GAMES-RP, and the median hemisphere volume in subjects above age 70 was lower compared to subjects ≤ age 70 (492 cm3 vs 546 cm3, p=.003).
Clinically, withdrawal of care is often the predominant mechanism of death in patients above age 70 with acute brain injury.14 In patients with severe brain injury (e.g. cardiac arrest or LHI), in which the severity of the initial insult is a strong predictor of outcome, withdrawal of care is especially common above age 70.15 Withdrawal of care is often due to disability related to the initial infarction or potentially undesirable procedures such as placement of feeding tube or tracheostomy. Given the more prominent effects of cerebral edema in subjects ≤70 years, future investigations of efficacy of IV glyburide should focus on this population.
In GAMES-RP, we included established instruments to evaluate multiple dimensions of outcome after LHI. Large hemispheric infarction is amongst the most devastating forms of arterial ischemic stroke with mortality rates as high as 50%.32 Although decompressive craniectomy has been shown to reduce death and, in selected subjects, improve outcomes, survivors often have severe disability and functional dependence.32–34 In addition to impaired motor function, these patients frequently suffer from injury to other domains including cognition, language, and visual function, all of which significantly contribute to their overall outcomes.35–37 Many physicians therefore have concerns about the long-term quality of life among survivors of LHI.38 Conversely, patients frequently achieve a satisfying level of psychological well-being despite their severe physical deficits.36 Furthermore, van Middelaar at al. showed that patients who underwent surgical decompression for space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarction have a good mental quality of life that is comparable to the general population, and the majority of patients and caregivers would, in retrospect, again opt for surgery.39 We applied the EQ-5D and Barthel index to assess 12-month quality of life and to explore whether or not patients with moderately severe disability have acceptable outcomes. The significant difference in the EQ-5D and Barthel index observed in the present analysis suggests that these instruments provide additional important insights into overall quality of life after LHI, which is particularly important in the subgroup of patients with moderate-to-severe disability. However, after excluding patients who died, the treatment effect was no longer significant (Table 3), a finding that suggests that the difference in BI and EQ-5D in this analysis was mainly determined by increased early mortality in the placebo group. The study was not powered for a quality of life endpoint, and it is possible that the sample size was too small to show a difference quality of life among survivors of LHI. A multi-dimensional assessment of outcome should therefore be included in future investigations of efficacy to assess whether treatment with intravenous glyburide can, in addition to reducing mortality, lead to meaningful improvements in quality of life.
Following the initial 90 days, we observed continued improvement up to six months, with moderate relative gains in recovery in both groups. Subsequently, outcomes remained stable to 12 months (Figure 3). These findings suggest that outcome at 90 days may inform longer term outcome and likely constitutes a meaningful endpoint for future studies of IV glyburide.
In this subgroup of patients ≤70 years, treatment with IV glyburide led to a 51% reduction in plasma MMP-9 levels, which is greater than the 39% reduction seen in the overall GAMES-RP cohort. MMP-9 is a marker of blood-brain-barrier disruption and has been associated with cerebral edema after stroke.40 Midline shift is another marker for cerebral edema after LHI. The extent of lateral displacement of midline structures has been correlated with decreased level of consciousness,41 a finding that was also seen in GAMES-RP.8 The significant reduction in midline shift in patients treated with IV glyburide further supports the potential positive effect of this therapy on cerebral edema in patients ≤ 70 years.
A notable strength of our study is prospective data collection using standardized methods that address multiple domains, all at multiple time points. However, our study has important limitations. First, this study was an exploratory, post-hoc subgroup analysis of the GAMES-RP trial. A significant imbalance in age could have favored the IV glyburide group. The small sample that results from any age cut point limits the power of an exploratory analysis. These results are hypothesis generating. Also, while there was no significant difference in the rate of decompressive craniectomy between treatment groups, there was a 10% increase in the glyburide group. Alternatively, as a post-randomization practice variable, it is also possible that decompressive craniectomy was performed in an inconsistent manner, favoring those patients most likely to benefit. Whereas decompressive craniectomy may improve outcome, craniectomy plus subsequent cranioplasty necessitates recovery from two surgeries, both of which expose patients to complications that can negatively impact outcome.
Clinical studies designed to detect an effect of a treatment that inhibits edema formation may consider enriching the population with patients ≤70 years. While the present analyses are exploratory, the 12-month effects of glyburide on mortality provide evidence for a potential role in improving outcomes in patients with large hemispheric stroke. The results support additional study and prospective trials designed to assess the role of IV glyburide, or BIIB093, for improving outcomes for patients with large hemispheric infarction.
Acknowledgments
Sources of Funding
Remedy Pharmaceuticals provided funding for GAMES-RP. JMS is supported by grants from NIH (R01 HL082517) and NIH (R01 NS060801).
Footnotes
Disclosures
JMS has a patent related to the study and has shares in Remedy Pharmaceuticals. WTK, KNS, JJE, GKS, and LAB received grants from Remedy Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of this study. KNS AND WTK also receive research grants from the American Heart Association. BJM and HH received grants from Remedy Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work. JJE received personal fees from Remedy. NHP declares no competing interests. KC received fees from Remedy. Biogen was provided the ability to review this manuscript. The authors maintained full control of all content.
Clinical Trial Registration (www.clinicaltrials.gov): NCT01794182
References
- 1.Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Neurology. 2007;6:215–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wijdicks EFM, Sheth KN, Carter BS, Greer DM, Kasner SE, Kimberly WT, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council. Recommendations for the management of cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swelling: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:1222–1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hofmeijer J, van der Worp HB, Kappelle LJ. Treatment of space-occupying cerebral infarction. Critical Care Medicine. 2003;31:617–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huttner HB, Schwab S. Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:949–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kurland DB, Khaladj-Ghom A, Stokum JA, Carusillo B, Karimy JK, Gerzanich V, et al. Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23:292–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Simard JM, Woo SK, Schwartzbauer GT, Gerzanich V. Sulfonylurea receptor 1 in central nervous system injury: a focused review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1699–1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Simard JM, Sheth KN, Kimberly WT, Stern BJ, del Zoppo GJ, Jacobson S, et al. Glibenclamide in cerebral ischemia and stroke. Neurocrit Care. 2014;20:319–333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sheth KN, Elm JJ, Molyneaux BJ, Hinson H, Beslow LA, Sze GK, et al. Safety and efficacy of intravenous glyburide on brain swelling after large hemispheric infarction (GAMES-RP): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:1160–1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.DeCarli C, Massaro J, Harvey D, Hald J, Tullberg M, Au R, et al. Measures of brain morphology and infarction in the framingham heart study: establishing what is normal. Neurobiol. Aging. 2005;26:491–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee SH, Oh CW, Han JH, Kim C-Y, Kwon O-K, Son Y-J, et al. The effect of brain atrophy on outcome after a large cerebral infarction. Journal of Neurology , Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2010;81:1316–1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Krieger DW, Demchuk AM, Kasner SE, Jauss M, Hantson L. Early clinical and radiological predictors of fatal brain swelling in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:287–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jaramillo A, Góngora-Rivera F, Labreuche J, Hauw J-J, Amarenco P. Predictors for malignant middle cerebral artery infarctions: a postmortem analysis. Neurology. 2006;66:815–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oppenheim C, Samson Y, Manaï R, Lalam T, Vandamme X, Crozier S, et al. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2000;31:2175–2181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Holloway RG, Arnold RM, Creutzfeldt CJ, Lewis EF, Lutz BJ, McCann RM, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:1887–1916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Albaeni A, Chandra-Strobos N, Vaidya D, Eid SM. Predictors of early care withdrawal following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1455–1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sheth KN, Elm JJ, Beslow LA, Sze GK, Kimberly WT. Glyburide Advantage in Malignant Edema and Stroke (GAMES-RP) Trial: Rationale and Design. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24:132–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser Jacques. Use of the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in Acute Stroke Trials. Stroke. 1999;30:1538–1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. The Lancet Neurology. 2006;5:603–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke. 1997;28:1876–1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine. 2009;33:337–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Luo N, Johnson JA, Shaw JW, Feeny D, Coons SJ. Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Med Care. 2005;43:1078–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005;43:203–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yan J, Fine J. Estimating equations for association structures. Stat Med. 2004;23:859–74–discussion 875–7–879–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fox NC, Schott JM. Imaging cerebral atrophy: normal ageing to Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2004;363:392–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Scahill RI, Frost C, Jenkins R, Whitwell JL, Rossor MN, Fox NC. A longitudinal study of brain volume changes in normal aging using serial registered magnetic resonance imaging. Arch. Neurol. 2003;60:989–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Resnick SM, Pham DL, Kraut MA, Zonderman AB, Davatzikos C. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: a shrinking brain. Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;23:3295–3301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thomalla G, Hartmann F, Juettler E, Singer OC, Lehnhardt F-G, Köhrmann M, et al. , for the Clinical Trial Net of the German Competence Network Stroke. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours of symptom onset: A prospective multicenter observational study. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:435–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Beck C, Kruetzelmann A, Forkert ND, Juettler E, Singer OC, Köhrmann M, Kersten JF, et al. A simple brain atrophy measure improves the prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by acute DWI lesion volume. J. Neurol. 2014;261:1097–1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goto Y, Kumura E, Watabe T, Nakamura H, Nishino A, Koyama T, et al. Prediction of Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction in Elderly Patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:1389–1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alexander P, Heels-Ansdell D, Siemieniuk R, Bhatnagar N, Chang Y, Fei Y, et al. Hemicraniectomy versus medical treatment with large MCA infarct: a review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e014390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Neurology. 2007;6:215–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rahme R, Zuccarello M, Kleindorfer D, Adeoye OM, Ringer AJ. Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery territory infarction: is life worth living? J. Neurosurg. 2012;117:749–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Geurts M, van der Worp HB, Kappelle LJ, Amelink GJ, Algra A, Hofmeijer J. Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction: outcomes at 3 years in the randomized HAMLET trial. Stroke. 2013;44:2506–2508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sarnowski von B, Kleist-Welch Guerra W, Kohlmann T, Moock J, Khaw AV, Kessler C, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life after decompressive hemicraniectomy in stroke patients with life-threatening space-occupying brain edema. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:627–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hofmeijer J, van der Worp HB, Kappelle LJ, Amelink GJ, Algra A, van Zandvoort MJE. Cognitive outcome of survivors of space-occupying hemispheric infarction. J. Neurol. 2013;260:1396–1403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schwarz S, Kühner C. [Prognosis and quality of life after decompressive hemicraniectomy: a nationwide survey in Germany on the attitudes held by doctors and nurses]. Nervenarzt. 2012;83:731–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.van Middelaar T, Richard E, van der Worp HB, van den Munckhof P, Nieuwkerk PT, Visser MC, et al. Quality of life after surgical decompression for a space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarct: A cohort study. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:156–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Serena J, Blanco M, Castellanos M, Silva Y, Vivancos J, Moro MA, et al. The prediction of malignant cerebral infarction by molecular brain barrier disruption markers. Stroke. 2005;36:1921–1926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ropper AH. Lateral displacement of the brain and level of consciousness in patients with an acute hemispheral mass. N. Engl. J. Med . 1986;314:953–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



